Recurring concern

Unreliable recording and confirmation of specialist clinical advice

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 21 Aug 2014•Latest report 21 Apr 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in the dedicated process for documenting, communicating, confirming or making available specialist clinical advice or treatment instructions to the clinicians or staff responsible for care.

Not included

  • Excludes generic clinical documentation or communication failures where specialist advice or instructions are not the material concern.
  • Excludes failures to seek or obtain specialist advice when the advice-recording, communication or confirmation process is not deficient.
  • Excludes failures involving patient-facing advice, routine handover or non-specialist instructions unless they are explicitly part of communicating or confirming specialist clinical advice.
  • Excludes failures to follow specialist advice after it was reliably recorded and communicated, where the advice-transfer process itself was not unsafe.
Reports
11

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
12

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
19

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Care Quality Commission2
Department of Health and Social Care2
East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust2
General Medical Council2
NHS England2
Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust1
Kent and Medway Mental Health NHS Trust1
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust1
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board1
Parents of Kinga Cieciorska1
Recipient name withheld1
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists1
Royal College of Physicians1
Royal College of Surgeons of England1
Springfield Home Care Services Limited1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Gateshead and South Tyneside

    AI-generated summary

    Theresa Lydon · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Theresa Lydon had severe ulcerative colitis and was admitted to hospital on four occasions before her death following complications of surgery, including an intra-abdominal haemorrhage. The report identifies concerns about delayed prescribing, unclear communication of treatment plans, inadequate access to medical records between NHS Trusts, and the absence of repeated blood tests that contributed to her death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to clearly communicate treatment plans and required actions in consultant correspondence

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) During the course of the inquest it was established Mrs Lydon was diagnosed with a condition and treatment was prescribed in the form of a repeat prescription drug in May 2021. The diagnosing consultant set out the treatment plan in a letter to her GP and the format of the letter was such it was difficult for the receiving GP to see what actions were required by him. This is compounded when paper correspondence is routinely scanned and emailed by administrators and the GP is 'drawn' to certain sections of the document by the administrators. It was remarked in evidence by the GP that all consultants seem to format their correspondence differently and there is no uniform format so a GP can see clearly at the outset what the treatment plan is and what action needs to be taken. Evidence from the Hospital Trust in question stated they had changed the format of this type of correspondence to make it easier to identify the actions to be taken. In Mrs Lydon's case, the drug she was prescribed in May 2021 was not identified from the correspondence and was supplied to her in June 2022 when the situation was discovered. Whilst a remedy has been implemented locally I have a concern that nationally there is a risk of future deaths if important correspondence contained treatment plans is not clearly communicated to those responsible for implementing them. ”

    Source location

    Theresa Lydon · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Produce national guidance on clear, concise, structured outpatient clinic letters and required primary-care actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As that is not yet universal, nationally, the Getting it Right First Time (GIRFT) Team produced a Clinically Led Speciality Outpatient Guide document in July 2023 highlighting the importance of clear, concise clinic letters and offering guidance on the best ways to do this. This states that outpatient clinic letters have at least three different audiences, each of which will have different requirements for what they need to be able to take from the contents. In view of this, clinic letters must be clear, concise,”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 June 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop the Red Tape Challenge to improve primary-secondary care communication, interface working, prescribing, records access, interoperability, and process standardisation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “An initiative called the ‘Red Tape Challenge’ was developed to improve the interface between primary and secondary care, such as how referrals are made and managed, patient discharge and how different parts of the health service communicate with each other. The Red Tape Challenge led to 10 recommendations, which were cascaded through Regional Medical Directors. The focus of the Red Tape Challenge is on reducing unnecessary bureaucracy, improving communication and understanding, strengthening culture and interface working between primary and secondary care, improving digital and estates infrastructure, streamlining healthcare delivery, enhancing patient experience, and freeing up clinical time. Those especially relating to this case include:”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 6 · response
    Published 19 June 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implementation of measures improving primary-secondary care communication and prescribing is driven by integrated care boards, with national oversight.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “An initiative called the ‘Red Tape Challenge’ was developed to improve the interface between primary and secondary care, such as how referrals are made and managed, patient discharge and how different parts of the health service communicate with each other. The Red Tape Challenge led to 10 recommendations, which were cascaded through Regional Medical Directors. The focus of the Red Tape Challenge is on reducing unnecessary bureaucracy, improving communication and understanding, strengthening culture and interface working between primary and secondary care, improving digital and estates infrastructure, streamlining healthcare delivery, enhancing patient experience, and freeing up clinical time. Those especially relating to this case include:”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 6 · response
    Published 19 June 2026

    Open published response
  2. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Nisren Abdul-Karim · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Nisren Abdul-Karim had underlying health conditions and developed hallucinations before being admitted to Wythenshawe Hospital, where she sustained a fractured hip in an unsupervised fall. She was transferred to Trafford General Hospital for rehabilitation, continued to deteriorate, and died there on 5 January 2024. The principal concern was that neurology notes recorded on patient pass were difficult to access and contained limited detail, resulting in disjointed neurology care and an unclear overview, particularly at sites without face-to-face neurology services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient detail in neurology notes to communicate advice and clinical contact

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence before the inquest was that the neurology service based at Salford Royal Hospital provided a service across Greater Manchester. However the notes kept by the neurology team were not stored on the patient’s notes but recorded on patient pass. This meant accessing the notes required recognising that patient pass needed to be accessed. In addition the evidence was that the detail within the neurology notes on patient pass was very limited and meant that it was difficult to fully understand the neurology advice given or the contact that there had been with neurology. As a consequence delivery of neurology care was disjointed and meant there was no clear neurology overview held by neurology. This impacted on the care that could be provided to patients and the provision of advice to other clinicians. Illustrative of this one neurologist was unaware that it was one of their neurology colleagues had diagnosed a neuro degenerative disease. This is exacerbated in relation to sites such as Trafford Hospital where all contact with neurology is telephone or patient pass as there is no face to face neurology service. ”

    Source location

    Nisren Abdul-Karim · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  3. Mid Kent and Medway

    AI-generated summary

    Sarah Rhiannon Keen · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sarah Keen, who had a history of mental health difficulties and required support with daily activities, died after being discharged from hospital to supported accommodation. A post-mortem examination determined the medical cause of death to be multi-drug toxicity involving fluoxetine and dihydrocodeine in the presence of cocaine. The principal concerns were inadequate communication to carers about her risks and medication, insufficient guidance about discharge medication, and use of an abbreviation that was not universally understood.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to document and communicate discharge medication recommendations

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The note left by the psychiatrist on the medical records did not contain any recommendations as to medication. The psychiatrist was aware that Sarah’s medication was being held by her support workers as a result of the risk of mismanagement by overdosing. He was also aware that it was policy for the hospital to dispense 14 days of medication on discharge. He did not consider asking the discharging doctor to not provide Sarah with any medication on the basis that there was already a prescription in the community and although he considered that it was appropriate for the quantity of discharge medication to be reduced to seven days to reduce the risk of overdose, he did not communicate this to the medical team within the note. ”

    Source location

    Sarah Rhiannon Keen · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Record when a reduced medication quantity should be prescribed because of self-harm or overdose risk.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The discharging clinician (both or either DGT and KMPT) should record if a reduced amount of medication should be prescribed because of risk of self-harm or overdose.”

    Source location

    Response from Darent Valley Trust and Kent & Medway NHS and Social Partnership
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    State in discharge notifications when medication has been reduced and record the reason.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The discharge notification should indicate that a reduced amount of medication has been prescribed and the reason for this recorded.”

    Source location

    Response from Darent Valley Trust and Kent & Medway NHS and Social Partnership
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 March 2024

    Open published response
  4. Newcastle upon Tyne and North Tyneside

    AI-generated summary

    David Michael O’Brien · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    David Michael O’Brien died at North Tyneside General Hospital after falling from his wheelchair, sustaining a hip fracture, and developing bronchopneumonia. Concerns included excessive wheelchair use despite advice that it was for mobility only, inadequate communication and record keeping between care providers, failure to undertake a risk assessment, and advice about the wheelchair not being followed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate specialist wheelchair assessment and advice to care staff

    Wider context from the report

    “6. Springfield Health Care state that they were not aware of the assessment on 20.12.19 by Wheelchair Services or the advice given, despite one of their carers being present during the assessment. On 1.1.2020 Mr O’Brien fell from his wheelchair sustaining injuries which ultimately led to his death. ”

    Source location

    David Michael O’Brien · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    There were no reasonable grounds to suspect an offence under Regulations 12 and 22, so formal criminal investigation was not undertaken.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The second took place after the inquest and took account of the evidence gathered during the coronial investigation and specifically the concerns raised at points 1-8 of your Regulation 28 report. In both cases the CQC concluded there were no reasonable grounds to suspect an offence under Regulations 12 and 22 RAR 2014 and no formal criminal investigation was undertaken.”

    Source location

    2022-0068-Response-from-CQC_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 March 2022

    Open published response
  5. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Peter James Michael Unsworth · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Peter James Michael Unsworth had a history of deep vein thromboses and was taking long-term anticoagulant medication before a right hip replacement. After developing an infected hip and undergoing surgery, his anticoagulant dose was reduced following haematological advice that was not recorded in writing; he subsequently developed pulmonary emboli and died at home on 29 July 2018. The principal concern was that the lack of written records may have led to a misunderstanding of the advice given and its significance.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to document received specialist advice and confirm understanding

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence showed that: 1. The advice provided by the Consultant Haematologist related to a very complex medical situation. It was not recorded in writing. The Consultant Orthopaedic surgeon did not record it in the patient’s records nor email his understanding of the advice to the Consultant Haematologist for confirmation of what he understood the advice to be. 2. The Consultant Haematologist did not confirm her advice in writing or make any record of the advice given. 3. As a consequence, there may have been a misunderstanding of the basis on which the advice was sought and/or given, and of the import of the advice. ”

    Source location

    Peter James Michael Unsworth · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to confirm and record specialist advice

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence showed that: 1. The advice provided by the Consultant Haematologist related to a very complex medical situation. It was not recorded in writing. The Consultant Orthopaedic surgeon did not record it in the patient’s records nor email his understanding of the advice to the Consultant Haematologist for confirmation of what he understood the advice to be. 2. The Consultant Haematologist did not confirm her advice in writing or make any record of the advice given. 3. As a consequence, there may have been a misunderstanding of the basis on which the advice was sought and/or given, and of the import of the advice. ”

    Source location

    Peter James Michael Unsworth · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain guidance requiring accurate records, detailed follow-up notes, discharge summaries, and prompt sharing of relevant postoperative information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Royal College of Surgeons (England) is clear that information sharing is an essential part of the provision of safe and effective care. The need for effective and appropriate information sharing is a key part of our core guidance document for surgeons, Good Surgical Practice, and underpins our series of associated resources, and specifically our Good Practice Guides.”

    Source location

    Response-from-RCS-England-2020-0267-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 January 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Endorse and support the Professional Record Standards Body’s standards for the structure and content of health and care records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The RCS also has engaged with the development of – and endorses – the detailed advice published by the Professional Record Standards Body and specifically their Standards for the Structure and Content of Health and Care Records.”

    Source location

    Response-from-RCS-England-2020-0267-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 January 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Highlight the absence of standards verifying verbally provided clinical advice accuracy to the Professional Record Standards Board.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As members of the Professional Record Standards Board (PRSB) we advise on elements of record standards. Following a review with PRSB the recording of advice is covered by GMC guidance, however standards to confirm the accuracy of that advice if it is given verbally is not currently covered in any standard. We have highlighted this as a member of PRSB. In response to learning from the CoViD 19 pandemic and the increase in the use of remote advice have proposed that standards are developed with respect to what elements of remote advice should be documented to ensure effectiveness and prevent harm. Where electronic records exist then this becomes much easier to implement as it is visible to both parties. We continue to advocate for the introduction of integrated electronic record systems within the NHS to enable this.”

    Source location

    2020-0267-Response-from-Royal-College-of-Physicians-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 January 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Propose developing standards specifying which elements of remote clinical advice should be documented to ensure effectiveness and prevent harm.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As members of the Professional Record Standards Board (PRSB) we advise on elements of record standards. Following a review with PRSB the recording of advice is covered by GMC guidance, however standards to confirm the accuracy of that advice if it is given verbally is not currently covered in any standard. We have highlighted this as a member of PRSB. In response to learning from the CoViD 19 pandemic and the increase in the use of remote advice have proposed that standards are developed with respect to what elements of remote advice should be documented to ensure effectiveness and prevent harm. Where electronic records exist then this becomes much easier to implement as it is visible to both parties. We continue to advocate for the introduction of integrated electronic record systems within the NHS to enable this.”

    Source location

    2020-0267-Response-from-Royal-College-of-Physicians-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 January 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue advocating for integrated electronic record systems within the NHS to support safer recording and verification of clinical advice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As members of the Professional Record Standards Board (PRSB) we advise on elements of record standards. Following a review with PRSB the recording of advice is covered by GMC guidance, however standards to confirm the accuracy of that advice if it is given verbally is not currently covered in any standard. We have highlighted this as a member of PRSB. In response to learning from the CoViD 19 pandemic and the increase in the use of remote advice have proposed that standards are developed with respect to what elements of remote advice should be documented to ensure effectiveness and prevent harm. Where electronic records exist then this becomes much easier to implement as it is visible to both parties. We continue to advocate for the introduction of integrated electronic record systems within the NHS to enable this.”

    Source location

    2020-0267-Response-from-Royal-College-of-Physicians-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 January 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Embed documentation of specialist advice in the Junior Doctors’ curriculum.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As an organisation, the documentation of specialist advice had been embedded in the curriculum for Junior Doctors and is emphasised at regular Trust events. The Trust takes the Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation (SBAR) approach to communication which is a structured framework for communication that enables information to be transferred accurately between individuals. In addition, Human Factors training events are held regularly as part of the postgraduate education programme. These events focus on improving documentation and communication between team members.”

    Source location

    2020-0267-Response-from-Ashford-and-St.-Peters-Hospitals-REDACTED
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 January 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce Electronic Patient Records to strengthen real-time documentation of specialist advice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Going forward the documenting of specialist advice will be further strengthened by the introduction of Electronic Patient Records which will allow clinicians to input information into health records in real time. It is anticipated that this system will go live in December 2021.”

    Source location

    2020-0267-Response-from-Ashford-and-St.-Peters-Hospitals-REDACTED
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 January 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce contemporaneous documentation of verbal clinical advice in patient records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “For your second concern, the Trust has reiterated to all staff and clinicians the need to document verbal advice or information contemporaneously within the patient’s notes in line with GMC Good Medical Practice 19, 21 and continues to audit medical records to monitor this and other aspects of record keeping to reinforce good practice. As an organisation, the documentation of specialist advice had been embedded in the curriculum for Junior Doctors and is emphasised at regular Trust events.”

    Source location

    2020-0267-Response-from-NHS-England-and-NHS-Improvement-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 January 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce electronic patient records to enable real-time documentation of specialist advice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Going forward the documenting of specialist advice will be further strengthened by the introduction of Electronic Patient Records which will allow clinicians to input information into health records in real time. It is anticipated that this system will go live within the Trust in December 2021.”

    Source location

    2020-0267-Response-from-NHS-England-and-NHS-Improvement-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 January 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Specific advice to physicians on recording and verifying clinical advice falls outside the organisation’s role and is covered by GMC guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The matter of concern in your notice is of the recording and verifying of clinical advice given between clinicians. Whilst the Royal College of Physicians does not give specific advice to Physicians on this matter this is covered under GMC Good Medical Practice Duties of a Doctor which states Clinical records should include: the decisions made and actions agreed, and who is making the decisions and agreeing the actions.”

    Source location

    2020-0267-Response-from-Royal-College-of-Physicians-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 January 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Responsibility for recording telephone advice was considered to rest with the recipient, not the doctor providing the advice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Furthermore, the information we received indicated that it would normally be for the recipient of the advice to record it in the medical notes, and where a doctor is giving advice over the phone, the person giving the advice would not always be expected to record it.”

    Source location

    2020-0267-Further-response-from-GMC-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 January 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The completed hospital Significant Incident investigation was considered to have addressed the issues, so no further regulatory action was required.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Taking this information into consider, it appears that the responsibility of ensuring a written record was made, did not lie with Dr ████████. We can see that there has been a full SI investigation which has addressed these issues, as such we don’t consider any further action is required by the GMC regarding Dr ████████.””

    Source location

    2020-0267-Further-response-from-GMC-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 January 2021

    Open published response
  6. North East Kent

    AI-generated summary

    HARRY RICHFORD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Harry Richford was born at QEQM on 2 November 2017 and died at William Harvey Hospital on 9 November 2017 after being transferred there. The report describes delays in delivery, shortcomings in the caesarean delivery and neonatal resuscitation, and subsequent hypoxia and brain injury. Substantive concerns included locum recruitment, assessment and supervision; clarity about escalation to consultants; neonatal resuscitation training; record keeping and adherence to guidelines; and inaccurate death notifications and reporting.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record consultant telephone advice

    Wider context from the report

    “Concern 14 There are no current records kept by consultants who are telephoned at home for advice. In this case there was a dispute about the number of calls made to ████████ and as to the content of these calls. The advice given and the actions taken as a result are important for the preservation of life. ”

    Source location

    HARRY RICHFORD · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 17 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust is responsible for setting out and implementing actions to address the identified maternity-service safety risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am advised that the Trust Board is taking these matters very seriously and has welcomed the national support being provided. I expect the Trust to set out in its response to your report the actions it is taking to address the important safety risks you have outlined.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 October 2022

    Open published response
  7. West Yorkshire Eastern

    AI-generated summary

    Michael John Drewell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Michael John Drewell fell from his bike while travelling to work on 16 November 2017, sustained a hip fracture, and underwent surgery. He later suffered a cardiac arrest at home and died on 22 December 2017 from a pulmonary thromboembolism, likely a complication of the hip surgery. The concerns were that a Senior Clinician’s advice for six weeks of Tinzaparin was not followed and was not recorded in the electronic notes, resulting in a four-week prescription that ended two days before his death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record senior clinician advice in electronic notes

    Wider context from the report

    “The treating Consultant advised that Mr Drewell, because of his height and weight, be given anti-coagulant Tinzaparin for six weeks rather than four weeks as was usual. He recorded his advice on the handwritten records at hospital following a ward round the day after surgery. When the Junior Doctor came to prescribe Tinzaparin several days later he likely did not consult the handwritten notes and only prescribed four weeks Tinzaparin immediately before Mr Drewell’s discharge from hospital. Evidence was heard that Junior Doctors would not be expected to consult the handwritten notes when prescribing drugs in accordance with NICE Guidelines. It is of concern that the advice of a Senior Clinician was not followed and, further, that his advice was not placed upon the electronic notes. ”

    Source location

    Michael John Drewell · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Record post-discharge Tinzaparin instructions on electronic drug charts and transfer them automatically to electronic discharge advice notes for eligible patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I can reassure you that good practice is already embedded within many clinical areas throughout the Trust. For example, Elderly Medicine patients with pelvic fractures who are being discharged to care in the community (CIC) beds have Tinzaparin continued until they are weight bearing after discharge. An instruction to this effect is added to the electronic drug chart and this information is then pulled through automatically to the EDAN. In addition, our pharmacists will also add electronic notes regarding discharge medication advice following multi-disciplinary team meetings with treating clinicians.”

    Source location

    2018-0259-Response-by-Leeds-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 September 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add electronic notes recording discharge medication advice after multidisciplinary team meetings with treating clinicians.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I can reassure you that good practice is already embedded within many clinical areas throughout the Trust. For example, Elderly Medicine patients with pelvic fractures who are being discharged to care in the community (CIC) beds have Tinzaparin continued until they are weight bearing after discharge. An instruction to this effect is added to the electronic drug chart and this information is then pulled through automatically to the EDAN. In addition, our pharmacists will also add electronic notes regarding discharge medication advice following multi-disciplinary team meetings with treating clinicians.”

    Source location

    2018-0259-Response-by-Leeds-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 September 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Comprehensively reviewing the entire medical record before electronic discharge prescribing is considered impractical for junior doctors.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In your Regulation 28 Report you highlight the fact that the junior doctor did not consult the hand-written medical records before prescribing the anticoagulant medication. I am sure that you will agree that it is impractical for junior doctors to comprehensively review the medical record in its entirety when completing the electronic discharge advice note (EDAN) and prescription. It is therefore imperative that if individual clinicians decide to prescribe ‘off protocol’ they either action this themselves personally, or leave clear unambiguous instructions within the electronic record. This can be done in two ways; either the eMeds electronic prescribing chart can be annotated or the EDAN can be pre-populated with specific discharge advice.”

    Source location

    2018-0259-Response-by-Leeds-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 September 2018

    Open published response
  8. Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Leslie Isaac LERNER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Leslie Isaac Lerner died on 3 June 2016 after treatment for a fractured shoulder, including application of an incorrect sling that caused a deep pressure sore and additional pain. The report identified concerns about inadequate senior review, analgesia, communication, handover, continuity of care, recognition of pneumonia and deterioration, and delay in initiating end-of-life care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate and document specialist treatment instructions

    Wider context from the report

    “16th May 2016 (1) Having been admitted to a renal ward, because of lack of beds elsewhere, a member of the medical staff had a telephone discussion with a member of the Orthopaedic Team and a collar and cuff sling was recommended. This information was not passed onto the Nursing Staff, not properly documented nor was the Patient actually seen by a member of Orthopaedic Team. He should have been seen and a note should have been made. (2) He then was moved to another ward, again not an Orthopaedic Ward, where any chance of correct hand over seems to have been lost because he was transferred to Baily Ward in the middle of the night. No proper handover. There was no referral to physiotherapists and yet the Trusts own paperwork says that exercises should be given by a Physiotherapist and commenced by the patient after seventy two hours of the fracture occurring. No speedy referral to physiotherapists. Within his notes was an utterly inadequate document explaining what the Patient needs to do with a fractured shoulder, however, as the Ward Manager pointed out it does not say what type of sling should be applied for this particular Patient and so she apparently had no idea anything was amiss. This document was not fit for purpose either for the patient or the ward. ”

    Source location

    Leslie Isaac LERNER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Black Country

    AI-generated summary

    Kinga Cieciorska · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kinga Cieciorska, a 16-year-old girl with complex medical needs, was taken to hospital with abdominal pain and distension. She was diagnosed with constipation and discharged, but deteriorated overnight and died after being returned to hospital on 11 March 2016; the stated cause of death was peritonitis from a perforated gastric ulcer. Concerns included failure to investigate tachycardia and an abnormal ECG, failures in recording and transmitting clinical information, and failure to consider the significance of her medication.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record the identity of the specialist clinician giving advice

    Wider context from the report

    “2. During the inquest it emerged there was evidence of systemic failings in recording of and transmission of information. The Junior Doctor failed to record the name of the Specialist Paediatric Registrar giving advice. More worryingly the Paediatric Registrar at inquest could not recollect giving any advice in relation to the patient. It also emerged during the inquest that medical notes provided by the GP were given to reception staff by the parents on admission. Unfortunately these documents were not forwarded or seen by the Junior Doctor on examination of the patient. ”

    Source location

    Kinga Cieciorska · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. North and West Cumbria

    AI-generated summary

    William Walter Jackson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    William Walter Jackson was diagnosed with severe aortic disease and underwent aortic valve and ascending-aorta replacement surgery in June 2013. After becoming unwell in August, a CT scan showed haemorrhage in the descending aorta, but the report did not identify features of a contained rupture; he died on 4 September 2013. The concerns included the lack of a formal record of advice from the Freeman Hospital, uncertainty about whether the CT images were reviewed, and the potential risk to patients from how such advice was given.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of formal recording of sudden clinical interactions

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The CIC records showed that an A&E doctor had spoken to a Specialist Cardio Thoracic Registrar at the Freeman Hospital. Inquiries of the Freeman showed that there was no record/ recollection of this contact. (2) I understand there is no system at the Freeman to formally record sudden interactions. This means no traceable record and no means by which the Freeman doctor could be identified let alone recall the advice given. (3) The advice appears to have been given without the Freeman doctor actually seeing the CT scan. Has the images been reviewed it is possible that the true state of the deceased’s health would have been ascertained. (4) Independent of the issue of an enquiry being able to establish what advice was given at the time; there is a risk that the way such advice appears to have been given could place patients lives at risk. ”

    Source location

    William Walter Jackson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement an electronic system to record details of advice provided to healthcare professionals at other hospitals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “(i) Actions already taken:”

    Source location

    2014-0509-Response-by-Newcastle-upon-Tyne-Hospital-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 November 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ensure the Cardiothoracic Surgical Team consistently uses the electronic system for external requests for medical opinions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• An electronic system is now in place within Cardiothoracic Surgery to record details of advice given when medical opinion is sought by a healthcare professional in another hospital.”

    Source location

    2014-0509-Response-by-Newcastle-upon-Tyne-Hospital-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 November 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Include electronic-system recording requirements in the induction programme for newly recruited and rotating staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “(ii) Further planned actions:”

    Source location

    2014-0509-Response-by-Newcastle-upon-Tyne-Hospital-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 November 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Further develop the recording system to prompt documentation of key items, including radiological images viewed when providing an opinion.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “(ii) Further planned actions:”

    Source location

    2014-0509-Response-by-Newcastle-upon-Tyne-Hospital-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 November 2014

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026