Recurring concern

Unreliable escalation by care staff for required medical attention

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 5 Sep 2013•Latest report 30 Jan 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes inadequate or unembedded escalation procedures and failures by care staff to obtain medical assessment or advice when deterioration, pain or a recognised condition requires it.

Not included

  • Quality of treatment after medical input was obtained
  • Routine healthcare access delays outside the care-staff escalation process
  • Generic care staffing or training concerns that do not impair clinical escalation
Reports
48

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
53

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
75

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Care Quality Commission7
Recipient name withheld4
Care UK2
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence2
Nursing and Midwifery Council2
Royal Sussex County Hospital2
Abbey Care Village1
Adbolton Hall1
Angel Solutions (UK) Ltd1
Belle Green Court1
Belong Limited1
Bolton Borough Council1
Bury Borough Council1
Calderdale Royal Hospital1
Cann House Care Home1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    George Goldby · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    George Goldby choked on a sandwich on 20 March 2017, was taken to hospital, and died on 24 March 2017. The principal concerns were that staff did not follow his speech and language therapy recommendations, including one-to-one supervision and dietary requirements; choking risk assessments and care plans were inadequately managed; and choking incidents were not properly reported or followed by appropriate referrals and reviews.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to re-refer residents to SALT when indicated

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) There were three missed opportunities to re-refer Mr Goldby to SALT and to review his care plan and dietary requirements. ”

    Source location

    George Goldby · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Refer residents meeting the threshold to Speech and Language Therapy and schedule required follow-up reviews.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. All Residents whose assessment indicated having reached the appropriate threshold of need have been referred to the Speech and Language team (SALT) service via the GP for review- New referrals have also been actioned and follow-ups reviews have been planned by SALT- 2 existing Residents are due a review, which have been scheduled.”

    Source location

    2018-0104-Response-by-HC-One
    Page 1 · response
    Published 17 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Assign the Care Manager oversight of communication and escalation between Speech and Language Therapy and home staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. The Care Manager has taken responsibility for oversight of communication between SALT and colleagues at the home to ensure optimum communication and appropriate escalation for support. This has been reported by all parties as very much improved, with greater clarity and swifter partnership working.”

    Source location

    2018-0104-Response-by-HC-One
    Page 1 · response
    Published 17 June 2018

    Open published response
  2. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Joan Osborne · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Joan Osborne, who had diabetes and advanced dementia, died on 25 August 2017 after repeated difficulties obtaining her blood glucose levels and administering her insulin. The concerns included failures by nursing home staff to seek medical assistance or escalate her missed insulin, inadequate records, failure to recognise her deteriorating condition, and inaccurate blood glucose measurement and treatment on 22 August 2017.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to seek medical assistance when insulin is refused over an extended period

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) The nursing home staff did not seek medical assistance for Mrs Osborne when she refused to have her insulin prescription over an extended period, on two separate occasions, leading to her hospitalisation on 12.08.2017 and 22.08.2017. ”

    Source location

    Joan Osborne · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to seek urgent GP attention during attendance at the home

    Wider context from the report

    “(6) The nursing home staff did not recognise the need, nor seek help, for Mrs Osborne’s deteriorating condition on 22.08.2017 and did not seek the urgent attention of her GP upon his usual attendance at the home on that date. ”

    Source location

    Joan Osborne · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to recognise and seek help for a deteriorating condition

    Wider context from the report

    “(6) The nursing home staff did not recognise the need, nor seek help, for Mrs Osborne’s deteriorating condition on 22.08.2017 and did not seek the urgent attention of her GP upon his usual attendance at the home on that date. ”

    Source location

    Joan Osborne · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Prioritise diabetes care planning, including instructions for seeking medical assistance when insulin or medication is refused.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Care planning with regards to diabetes management has been prioritised, as part of the lessons learned, and where required care plans include details with regards to when and how to seek medical assistance if insulin/medication is refused by a resident.”

    Source location

    2018-0091-Response-by-Adbolton-Hall-Ltd
    Page 3 · response
    Published 16 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Meet with the visiting GP to provide oversight of improvements and establish direct notification of future concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Additionally, on the 20 March 2018 the Home Manager met with the GP who visits Adbolton Hall to outline those many improvements that have been made as detailed above. This has provided valuable oversight and input from the GP and the Home Manager has also asked that he make her directly aware of any issues or concerns that he may have in the future.”

    Source location

    2018-0091-Response-by-Adbolton-Hall-Ltd
    Page 4 · response
    Published 16 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver Nutrition and Diabetes Management Training to nursing home staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “(3) The nursing home staff have received Nutrition and Diabetes Management Training. There were three separate sessions of this training, delivered at ‘Adbolton Hall’, on the 30/10/2017, 07/11/2017 and 30/11/2017. This training was delivered by ████████ a Community Dietician from the Clinical Commissioning Group. This training included Management of Type 2 Diabetes, Treatments of Hypoglycaemia and Dietary Needs.”

    Source location

    2018-0091-Response-by-Adbolton-Hall-Ltd
    Page 3 · response
    Published 16 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Diabetes care is considered adequately assessed and provided because relevant authorities were satisfied the home’s complex-needs admissions were safe.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “their pre-admission assessments were sent to ████████, Management Officer for the Quality and Market Management Team within Nottinghamshire County Council, and ████████, Care Home Quality Lead Nottingham North and East, Nottingham West and Rushcliffe Clinical Commissioning Group, to ensure that they were confident that the home could meet each individual’s needs. On 26 March 2018, ████████ advised the home that they were not required to continue to send these to them, as they were satisfied that all the home’s admissions, including those with individuals with complex needs, were safe. We are confident therefore that diabetes care is adequately assessed and provided for.”

    Source location

    2018-0091-Response-by-Adbolton-Hall-Ltd
    Page 4 · response
    Published 16 June 2018

    Open published response
  3. Staffordshire South

    AI-generated summary

    John Keith Edwards · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Keith Edwards, aged 64, was admitted to a care home for respite and subsequently suffered falls, seizures, reduced mobility, pressure sores and a rapid decline before dying in a nursing home on 19 December 2016. Concerns included inadequate care-home policies and care, failures to seek medical assistance and recognise deterioration, poor record-keeping, and inappropriate placement for his complex needs.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to seek medical assistance following seizures

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Southwinds Care home did not appear to be able to cope with Mr Edwards complex care needs. Consequently the original placement appeared to be inappropriate (2) The Care Home had an inadequate policy to deal with falls and no policy for pressure sore prevention and care (3) Care Home staff applied a seizure policy which was not specific to the resident. (4) Care Home staff failed to seek medical assistance following seizures. (5) Care Home staff failed to deal with significant bruising which developed 8 days after admission to the Care Home. (6) Care records were retrospectively filled in. (7) Staff and management failed to recognise and seek help for the residents deteriorating condition other than by way of an out of hours attendance when the GP was given minimal information and the urgent follow up request was not done. (8) Staff were unaware that medication brought in by the family was available to Mr Edwards, therefore it was not given. None was sought from the GP. (9) Non patient specific dressings were used on pressure sores. (10) A non-patient specific mattress was used on his bed. (11) Visits by the placement officer and disability nurse failed to identify Mr Edward’s deteriorating condition. ”

    Source location

    John Keith Edwards · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to seek and communicate appropriate medical follow-up for deteriorating residents

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Southwinds Care home did not appear to be able to cope with Mr Edwards complex care needs. Consequently the original placement appeared to be inappropriate (2) The Care Home had an inadequate policy to deal with falls and no policy for pressure sore prevention and care (3) Care Home staff applied a seizure policy which was not specific to the resident. (4) Care Home staff failed to seek medical assistance following seizures. (5) Care Home staff failed to deal with significant bruising which developed 8 days after admission to the Care Home. (6) Care records were retrospectively filled in. (7) Staff and management failed to recognise and seek help for the residents deteriorating condition other than by way of an out of hours attendance when the GP was given minimal information and the urgent follow up request was not done. (8) Staff were unaware that medication brought in by the family was available to Mr Edwards, therefore it was not given. None was sought from the GP. (9) Non patient specific dressings were used on pressure sores. (10) A non-patient specific mattress was used on his bed. (11) Visits by the placement officer and disability nurse failed to identify Mr Edward’s deteriorating condition. ”

    Source location

    John Keith Edwards · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Medical advice was sought appropriately, and no urgent referral was recommended or documented by the out-of-hours doctor.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “7. Medical advice for Mr Edwards was sought at the appropriate time. The Doctor was provided with full information and all questions raised by him were answered. There is no recollection as to the out of hours Doctor suggesting any urgent referral and no documentation (other than a prescription – which was obtained straight away) was left by the Doctor.”

    Source location

    2018-0015-Response-Southwinds-Limited
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 March 2018

    Open published response
  4. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    David Michael Lee · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    David Michael Lee was found unresponsive at home on 18 February 2017 after taking a considerable quantity of diphenhydramine and telling the emergency call handler about this during a 999 call. The call was terminated approximately 30 minutes in, and the report identified a missed opportunity to escalate the response before he became unconscious and died prior to the ambulance’s arrival.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to escalate the urgency of requirements for medical assistance

    Wider context from the report

    “That the call was inappropriately terminated and that this may continue in the future. That there was a missed opportunity to escalate the urgency of the requirement for medical assistance due to the call being terminated. Since the call guidance has not been circulated to members of call handling staff regarding in what circumstances it is appropriate to terminate call and when a call handler should, as a matter of best practice, remain on the line with the patient. Such guidance was circulated twice prior to the deceased’s death but was not adhered to on this occasion. That there has been no training given to staff since the deceased’s death to address when it is appropriate to terminate calls with patients. ”

    Source location

    David Michael Lee · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise the call-termination guidance and circulate it to all EOC supervisors.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following the inquest the Trust have revised the relevant guidance in respect of incidents where call takers should remain on the line and have circulated this to all EOC Supervisors, with the following key points emphasized as direct learning from this case:”

    Source location

    2017-0432
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 June 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Brief all call takers individually on the revised guidance and obtain signed confirmation that they understand it.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “EOC Supervisors have subsequently conducted one to one briefings with all call takers in all three EOCs to discuss the guidance and ensure that the practice of terminating calls is fully understood. All call takers are required to provide their signature to confirm that they have read and understood the guidance and its use.”

    Source location

    2017-0432
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 June 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish a reminder system to prompt periodic recirculation of call-termination guidance to call takers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To ensure that the guidance is re-circulated to all call takers at appropriate periodic intervals, the Trust’s Operations Director has also put in place a system whereby he will be periodically reminded to request that the EOC Management team complete the above recirculation process, thus ensuring all call takers are regularly reminded of the practices regarding call termination.”

    Source location

    2017-0432
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 June 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Produce an incident-based case study and use it in scheduled training and workshops for new and existing call takers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To ensure further Trust wide learning, the Trust’s Legal Department are to produce a case study based on this incident and the appropriate use of call terminations, which will be used in scheduled training sessions/workshops across all EOC’s for new and existing call takers; again to reinforce the practices that should be followed in situations such as this.”

    Source location

    2017-0432
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 June 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The emergency call was processed correctly and received the correct response code based on the information provided.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am advised that at the inquest, EOC Deputy Sector Manager Angela Lee gave evidence to the Coroner that the emergency call had been audited and it had been established that it had been processed correctly based on the information given to the call taker and the correct response code was obtained. The call taker stayed on the line with Mr Lee for 30 minutes, however due to Mr Lee telling the call taker that he was starting to feel drowsy, the call taker should have stayed on the line with him until the emergency ambulance arrived. Ms Lee confirmed in evidence that this was an individual error and that the call taker has undertaken a reflective learning exercise in order to identify the error made and reflect on her practice for the future.”

    Source location

    2017-0432
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 June 2017

    Open published response
  5. Preston and West Lancashire

    AI-generated summary

    Michael John NEWELL · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Michael John Newell died following an admission involving haemorrhage, decompensated liver failure and associated coagulopathy. Concerns included a lack of awareness among emergency and surgical staff of the significance of his liver failure, inadequate recognition and treatment of hypovolaemia, lack of consultant ENT input, weaknesses in the mortality review process, and nursing documentation and management issues.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to seek medical direction on future management after a peri-arrest

    Wider context from the report

    “(5) the conduct of the Nurse in charge of the ward of making no notes after her presence at a peri-arrest, neither seeking or obtaining any direction from the medical team as to future management, not directing any further resuscitation in accordance with documented medical plans in the notes and lack of completion of the fluid balance chart would suggest that the Trust's procedures for determining which nurse clinicians may lead a nursing shift should be reviewed. ”

    Source location

    Michael John NEWELL · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. Gloucestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Daphne Cherry · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Daphne Cherry, an 83-year-old care home resident, became dehydrated after reduced fluid intake during an infection and was admitted to hospital with a severe kidney injury. She died on 22 February 2016; the principal concern was whether care home staff could identify when a medical concern required escalation and medical review.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of care home staff to identify when medical concerns require escalation and medical review

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Whether staff at the Care Home are able to identify when a medical concern should be escalated and a medical review sought. ”

    Source location

    Daphne Cherry · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train the home manager, deputy manager and unit leaders in early recognition of sick and deteriorating residents.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As a preliminary point, Sandfields employs a number of registered nurses and there is always at least one on duty at any given time. As the Coroner will be aware, nurses undergo extensive professional training which would cover recognition of the clinical symptoms exhibited by a deteriorating resident. Care UK has nonetheless taken further action both to supplement this professional knowledge of our nurses, and also to train the rest of the Sandfields staff (including those who are non-clinically trained) in recognising deteriorating residents.”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 1 · response
    Published 24 March 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Book all shift leaders onto forthcoming Care Home Support training in recognising sick and deteriorating residents.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are awaiting further dates for training sessions to be released by the Care Home Support team and, as soon as they have been made available then all shift leaders will be booked onto upcoming sessions. We expect the dates to be released in the next couple of weeks.”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 1 · response
    Published 24 March 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Cascade deterioration-recognition training to shift leaders and remaining care-home staff, reinforcing the principles through individual supervision.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Alongside this, and in order to augment the training, the unit leaders have been specifically tasked, in conjunction with the Care UK governance team, with cascading the principles of the”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 1 · response
    Published 24 March 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit staff responses to unwell residents through management discussions, walkarounds and out-of-hours escalation oversight.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We recognise that it is important to also monitor the efficacy of training and knowledge-building, and this is the responsibility of the home manager and deputy home manager. One of them will be on duty at any one time, including evenings and weekends. There is therefore 24/7 management coverage. As we mentioned above, there is also always a nurse on duty.”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 March 2017

    Open published response
  7. South Yorkshire (Eastern)

    AI-generated summary

    John Atkinson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Atkinson received psychiatric services after contacting the Mental Health Team in crisis in July 2014 and died by suicide by hanging. The report identified concerns about outdated risk assessments, failures to recognise changing presentation and risk, inadequate arrangements when staff left, poor communication, and difficulty accessing Home Treatment Team services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to seek doctors' input when presentation or level of risk changes

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Failure of the care co-ordinator to identify changes in presentation and level of risk and to seek a doctors input. ”

    Source location

    John Atkinson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. West Sussex

    AI-generated summary

    Jean Stockley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jean Stockley was admitted after an unwitnessed fall down 13 stairs that caused spinal fractures. Her respiratory condition later deteriorated, leading to respiratory failure, intensive care treatment and her death on 20 April 2015. Concerns included failure to review her after a significant NEWS score increase, uncertainty about which doctor should be contacted, reluctance to escalate concerns to senior doctors, and possible benefits of automated NEWS monitoring.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inconsistent policies governing NEWS observation escalation

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Further, although the nurse quite rightly telephoned a doctor it was far from clear whether the right doctor had been contacted. The national NEWS forms were in use at the time of Mrs Stockley's death to record observations but the policy that governed their use was the 2012 MEWS Escalation Policy and the two policies were different. From evidence heard from both doctors and nurses, it suggests the need to revisit how the NEWS policy is applied locally especially around which doctor should be contacted when there is an acute change. ”

    Source location

    Jean Stockley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce a revised NEWS policy allowing contact with the staff member best placed to provide timely assistance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. Since April 2015, there have been several changes at the Princess Royal Hospital. The Critical Care Outreach Team, to whom you refer, implemented a 24 hour service on the site from June 2015, so are readily available to support and advise on the care of any patient whose condition is deteriorating. A revised NEWS policy has been introduced but it is recognised that some flexibility is required to ensure that contact is made with the member of staff who is most likely to be able to offer timely assistance to the patient. At night, there is no orthopaedic registrar present on the Princess Royal Hospital site, and the critical care and medical registrars who are on site are often better placed to assess the immediate needs of a patient whose condition has unexpectedly changed.”

    Source location

    2016-0286-Response-by-Brighton-and-Sussex-University-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 August 2016

    Open published response
  9. Manchester West

    AI-generated summary

    Mary Walker · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mary Walker, who had dementia and had been admitted to hospital after a stroke before being discharged to a care setting, was found dead on 10 October after overnight checks. She had died of bronchopneumonia. Concerns were raised about the lack of detail recorded during night-time checks and unclear procedures for Care Assistants escalating health concerns.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clear procedures for Care Assistants escalating health concerns

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) During the inquest there was a lack of clarity in relation to the procedures to be followed by Care Assistants when they wanted to escalate health concerns. This system requires review. ”

    Source location

    Mary Walker · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Undertake a comprehensive ratings inspection of Belong Wigan Care Village, including review of the provider’s response to the report findings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following receipt of this Report we held a management review meeting to look at the information we held in relation to this case. At this meeting we took the decision to:”

    Source location

    2016-0150-Response-by-Care-Quality-Commission
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 April 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind Support Workers how to escalate health concerns and seek external professional advice through staff training, induction, supervision, reviews and audits.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• All Support Workers have been reminded of the correct procedures to follow and how to seek advice from outside professionals for non-nursing customers in their care, when they need to escalate health concerns. This is incorporated into the care practice training for all staff, to include staff induction, supervision, life plan review and audit.”

    Source location

    2016-0150-Response-by-Belong
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 April 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The provider’s response and inspection consideration were sufficient, so no written confirmation or further action evidence was requested.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We noted the response provided to you by the registered provider, CLS Care Services Limited known as Belong on 27 April 2016. In light of this response it was not felt necessary for CQC to contact the registered provider to request written confirmation and”

    Source location

    2016-0150-Response-by-Care-Quality-Commission
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 April 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Following inspection and document review, no further investigation into the death or regulated activities was considered necessary.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Thank you for providing us with disclosure during the Coronial investigation. We can confirm that following our inspection and a review of these documents we do not intend to undertake further investigations in relation to the death of Mary Walker or the provision of regulated activities by CLS Care Services Limited.”

    Source location

    2016-0150-Response-by-Care-Quality-Commission
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 April 2016

    Open published response
  10. West Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    June Elsie Parkes · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    June Elsie Parkes became unwell with symptoms of an upper gastrointestinal bleed and was admitted to hospital on 14 December 2014. She later deteriorated and died shortly after being transferred to Huddersfield Royal Infirmary on 17 December 2014. The concerns included delays and gaps in systems for urgent or emergency endoscopy and surgery, monitoring and escalation, record keeping, and the transfer of critically ill patients.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of nursing staff to recognise and implement recommended NEWS escalation measures

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) Nursing staff compliance with the news system both in respect of accurately scoring each of the various vital signs, and recognising and implementing any escalation measures that are recommended . ”

    Source location

    June Elsie Parkes · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026