Recurring concern

Failure to provide required medication promptly when clinically needed

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 4 Sep 2013•Latest report 17 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in the medication-provision process that delay or prevent clinically required medication from being prescribed, processed, dispensed or administered when needed, including delayed usual medication after admission and delayed urgent therapeutic medication.

Not included

  • Excludes long-term medication review, medication reconciliation, dosage verification and medication administration concerns when timely provision of required medication is not the shared unsafe condition.
  • Excludes failures limited to medication continuity across care transitions where the issue is maintaining uninterrupted access rather than promptly initiating or providing medication when clinically needed.
  • Excludes medication shortages, prescribing inappropriateness or monitoring failures that do not directly cause delayed or absent provision of clinically required medication.
  • Excludes generic staffing, communication, documentation or electronic-system deficiencies unless they directly result in delayed or absent provision of the required medication.
Reports
32

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
34

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
51

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust3
Department of Health and Social Care2
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust2
Royal Cornwall Hospital2
Royal Free Hospital2
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust2
Aneurin Bevan University LHB1
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB1
Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1
Coastal Homecare – Hove Branch1
Community Disability Nurse1
Droylsden Road Family Practice1
Dr Simon Chapple1
General Pharmaceutical Council1
Hc-One Limited1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin

    AI-generated summary

    Patricia Violet PALIN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Patricia Violet PALIN died on 2 October 2017 after presenting to hospital with sepsis and kidney damage. The report describes delayed recognition and treatment, including delayed antibiotics, absence of oxygen administration, failure to remove leg dressings for examination, and failure to follow sepsis guidelines. Concerns also included limited access to GP records, insufficient A&E doctor cover, and an unavailable prescribed antibiotic.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of prescribed drugs in the A&E department

    Wider context from the report

    “3. I heard evidence that a prescribed drug Ertapenem was not in stock within the A&E department and that led to a delay of some two hours and twenty five minutes until administration. Other suitable alternative drugs were available but not considered. ”

    Source location

    Patricia Violet PALIN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Stock ertapenem in the Emergency Department to prevent treatment delays.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Doctor prescribing the Ertapenem was not made aware that it was not available in the department, so was unable to consider an alternative. The outcomes of the Root Cause Investigation were discussed with the team for learning to ensure communication is improved in the future. Furthermore, the drug is now stocked in the Emergency Department, to avoid recurrence in the future.”

    Source location

    2018-0183-Response-by-Shrewsbury-and-Telford-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 July 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review Emergency Department trolleys and assess a trial trolley containing equipment, antibiotics and fluids for immediate sepsis care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Alongside this we are reviewing the trolleys in the department, with the possibility of trialling a trolley that will allow for us to put everything into the trolley for immediate care of the septic patient, this includes antibiotics and fluids. The existing trolley in place does not carry everything required for immediate care.”

    Source location

    2018-0183-Response-by-Shrewsbury-and-Telford-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 July 2018

    Open published response
  2. Staffordshire South

    AI-generated summary

    John Keith Edwards · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Keith Edwards, aged 64, was admitted to a care home for respite and subsequently suffered falls, seizures, reduced mobility, pressure sores and a rapid decline before dying in a nursing home on 19 December 2016. Concerns included inadequate care-home policies and care, failures to seek medical assistance and recognise deterioration, poor record-keeping, and inappropriate placement for his complex needs.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure availability and administration of prescribed medication

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Southwinds Care home did not appear to be able to cope with Mr Edwards complex care needs. Consequently the original placement appeared to be inappropriate (2) The Care Home had an inadequate policy to deal with falls and no policy for pressure sore prevention and care (3) Care Home staff applied a seizure policy which was not specific to the resident. (4) Care Home staff failed to seek medical assistance following seizures. (5) Care Home staff failed to deal with significant bruising which developed 8 days after admission to the Care Home. (6) Care records were retrospectively filled in. (7) Staff and management failed to recognise and seek help for the residents deteriorating condition other than by way of an out of hours attendance when the GP was given minimal information and the urgent follow up request was not done. (8) Staff were unaware that medication brought in by the family was available to Mr Edwards, therefore it was not given. None was sought from the GP. (9) Non patient specific dressings were used on pressure sores. (10) A non-patient specific mattress was used on his bed. (11) Visits by the placement officer and disability nurse failed to identify Mr Edward’s deteriorating condition. ”

    Source location

    John Keith Edwards · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  3. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Lita SERKES · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lita Serkes underwent surgery at Whipps Cross Hospital on 22 July 2016, suffered a stroke the following morning, was transferred to the Royal London Hospital later that day, and died on 24 July. The concerns included discrepancies in observations and clinical records, delay in transfer for specialist stroke care, undelivered pain relief, and delayed recognition and assessment of a significant bleed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure functioning delivery of patient-controlled analgesia

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Patient controlled administration of pain relief was arranged for Mrs Serkes, but she remained in pain. It was quite some time before it was recognised that the device was not connected and so was not delivering any analgesia. ”

    Source location

    Lita SERKES · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide ongoing training to all nursing staff on using patient-controlled analgesia machines.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. To ensure that this doesn’t happen again, the pain team is giving on-going training to all nursing staff in the use of PCA machines.”

    Source location

    2016-0458-Response-by-Barts-Health-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 February 2017

    Open published response
  4. Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Leslie Isaac LERNER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Leslie Isaac Lerner died on 3 June 2016 after treatment for a fractured shoulder, including application of an incorrect sling that caused a deep pressure sore and additional pain. The report identified concerns about inadequate senior review, analgesia, communication, handover, continuity of care, recognition of pneumonia and deterioration, and delay in initiating end-of-life care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in providing pain relief after hospital arrival

    Wider context from the report

    “15th May 2016 (1) Mr Lerner was back at the RSCH, by ambulance at 1006 hrs in considerable pain and discomfort. He was seen by the Consultant in Elderly Medicine at 1645 and was given analgesia at 1700 hrs – ie almost 7 hours after he arrived at the hospital. This is completely unacceptable, this man was in pain from the fracture and he should have been given pain relief. At that stage he should also have been reviewed by the Orthopaedic Team, no such review was organised. ”

    Source location

    Leslie Isaac LERNER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide analgesia at discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “14th May 2016 (1) Mr Lerner was kept in the Royal Sussex County Hospital overnight and towards the middle of the day he was discharged without a Senior Review. I was told that before he was discharged he should have been seen by a Senior Doctor and it may well have been that the inappropriately applied sling would have been recognised. He was sent home with no analgesia. He should have been given analgesia. It became clear from the evidence that the pain that he suffered was very much part of his overall deterioration and an exacerbating factor with his dementia. The Hospital’s own Discharge Protocol was not followed, it should have been. ”

    Source location

    Leslie Isaac LERNER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. North Wales (East and Central)

    AI-generated summary

    Pamela June Conway · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Pamela June Conway developed an infected knee and experienced cumulative delays, including around 21 hours before receiving antibiotics, during which she went into irrevocable septic shock. The concerns included the absence of a finalised care pathway for patients with an infected prosthesis and an almost two-hour delay between knee aspiration and antibiotic administration. The inquest recorded that her death was due to natural causes exacerbated by delayed medical treatment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in administering antibiotics after knee aspiration

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Furthermore evidence indicated that although it was always intended that antibiotics would be administered once the patient's knee had been aspirated, there was a delay of almost two hours between this procedure and the administration of antibiotics (a delay which was explained by being due to “normal hospital procedures”). ”

    Source location

    Pamela June Conway · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Freda Weston · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Freda Weston was treated for septic arthritis in a replacement knee and died in hospital on 29 April 2015. The report states that Septrin led to disseminated intravascular coagulation and identifies concerns including delays in antibiotics, insufficient time to assess whether the new drug suited her, inadequate staffing, and failures in communication and escalation procedures.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in administering prescribed antibiotics

    Wider context from the report

    “2. She was advised for teicoplanin on the 8th April at 17.10 hours yet she had not even been given the first dose thereof by 15.56 hours on the 9th April. 3. There was a 48 hour delay in her being given any antibiotics. ”

    Source location

    Freda Weston · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The patient did not receive Teicoplanin during this admission; oral Doxycycline followed the subsequent knee washout.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “On 8th April our Microbiology department contacted the Trauma and Orthopaedic registrar to advise that the aspirate taken from the knee was growing an organism, although they were unclear as to what the organism was. They therefore recommended to the registrar that the patient be given intravenous Teicoplanin (as they normally would for an infected joint).”

    Source location

    Weston-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 February 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Intravenous antibiotics were not indicated during the 48-hour period because the patient was clinically well and revision surgery was not planned.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In Mrs Weston’s case she was clinically well, showing no signs of generalised sepsis and therefore giving intravenous antibiotics would have had no clear benefit for her at that time. ████████ had already ruled out the option of revision surgery and therefore the Trauma and Orthopaedic registrar made the decision to withhold intravenous antibiotic treatment until a definitive long term plan had been discussed with ████████ the outcome of which was likely to involve a joint washout to reduce the microbial load followed by long term oral antibiotics. ████████ Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, confirmed this plan with ████████ the following day and clearly documented that IV antibiotics were not indicated, as the plan was for washout followed by long term infection suppression with oral antibiotics and that IV antibiotics would only be indicated if Mrs Weston became clinically unwell.”

    Source location

    Weston-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 February 2016

    Open published response
  7. Manchester West

    AI-generated summary

    Eric Albert Gaskell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Eric Albert Gaskell attended Royal Bolton Hospital with chest pain on 6 November 2015 and was discharged with a presumed diagnosis of stable angina. He collapsed while working on 8 November 2015 and died at Salford Royal Hospital; the medical cause of death was ischaemic heart disease, coronary artery thrombus and coronary artery atheroma. The report raised concerns that Royal Bolton Hospital’s prescribing policy and pharmacy opening hours could prevent patients from obtaining medication, including potentially lifesaving medication, outside pharmacy opening times.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide patients with 24-hour access to required medication

    Wider context from the report

    “i. Due to the current policy adopted by the Royal Bolton Hospital regarding the prescribing of medication, a future death could occur if a person is not given 24 hour access to medication that they require and I therefore request that a review be conducted by the Royal Bolton Hospital of their policies and procedures in respect of the prescribing at the Hospital. ”

    Source location

    Eric Albert Gaskell · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the existing Accident and Emergency stock list of over-labelled and pre-packed medicines.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Action | Target Date | To be actioned by Review the existing stock list of over-labelled and pre-packed medicines with Accident and Emergency Department. | 31 May 2016 | Steve Simpson, Chief Pharmacist Advertise the opening hours and the process for obtaining medicines out of hours with Accident and Emergency Department. | April 2016 | Steve Simpson, Chief Pharmacist Memorandum to all Wards and Departments regarding the supply of medicines out of hours. | Completed 25 February 2016 | Steve Simpson”

    Source location

    Eric-Gaskell-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 February 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Advertise Pharmacy opening hours and the process for obtaining medicines outside normal hours to Accident and Emergency staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Action | Target Date | To be actioned by Review the existing stock list of over-labelled and pre-packed medicines with Accident and Emergency Department. | 31 May 2016 | Steve Simpson, Chief Pharmacist Advertise the opening hours and the process for obtaining medicines out of hours with Accident and Emergency Department. | April 2016 | Steve Simpson, Chief Pharmacist Memorandum to all Wards and Departments regarding the supply of medicines out of hours. | Completed 25 February 2016 | Steve Simpson”

    Source location

    Eric-Gaskell-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 February 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue a memorandum to all wards and departments about supplying medicines outside normal hours.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Action | Target Date | To be actioned by Review the existing stock list of over-labelled and pre-packed medicines with Accident and Emergency Department. | 31 May 2016 | Steve Simpson, Chief Pharmacist Advertise the opening hours and the process for obtaining medicines out of hours with Accident and Emergency Department. | April 2016 | Steve Simpson, Chief Pharmacist Memorandum to all Wards and Departments regarding the supply of medicines out of hours. | Completed 25 February 2016 | Steve Simpson”

    Source location

    Eric-Gaskell-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 February 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust disputes that patients lack 24-hour access to required medicines.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am sorry to learn that during the course of establishing how Mr Gaskell came about his death you heard evidence which appeared to indicate that hospital does not have 24 hour access to medication that may be required by a patient. I wish to assure you that this is not the case and on receipt of the Regulation 28, I requested that the Chief Pharmacist and Medicines Safety Group review the matters detailed in your Report.”

    Source location

    Eric-Gaskell-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 February 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing medicines policies, stocks, emergency supplies and on-call pharmacist arrangements ensure medication is available at all times.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In relation to 24 hour access to medicines, the Trust’s Medicines Policy (attached) outlines in Section 18 the process for the supply of medicines to patients at Bolton NHS Foundation Trust. In Section 18.2.4.1 and Appendix 15 of the Medicines Policy, the process for supply of medicines outside of normal Pharmacy working hours is described in detail. In addition there is Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) to be used in conjunction with the Policy.”

    Source location

    Eric-Gaskell-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 February 2016

    Open published response
  8. Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Mrs. Evelyn KENNEDY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mrs. Evelyn KENNEDY was an 89-year-old woman who died in hospital on 29 October 2014 after admission following recurrent falls. The inquest concluded that she died of hospital-acquired pneumonia and that her death was probably accelerated by a short time because of the effects of her five-day admission to the Acute Medical Unit. Concerns included incomplete handover and poor personal care, missing identification and risk bands, inadequate monitoring and documentation, missed medication and nutritional support, and failures to escalate clinical deterioration.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to prescribe and administer prescribed Sertraline

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Once again my concerns involve the Acute Medical Unit (AMU). (2) Mrs. KENNEDY was transferred from AMU in a chair, not a trolley. (3) Handover was incomplete and unhelpful. (4) She arrived unkempt. (5) She had porridge leaking from her mouth; it took 20 mouth sponges to give her adequate mouth care. (6) She felt cold and said she was cold. (7) She had been incontinent of faeces and had not been cleaned for some time. (8) She had no name wrist band. (9) In spite of known allergies she had no allergy wrist band. (10) In spite of falling regularly she had no falls risk wrist band. (11) She still had an IV cannula in place; this should have been removed after 72 hours. (12) Her daily catheter care bundle had not been completed for 3 days. (13) She had no fluid charts for 16th, 17th, 18th, 19th or 20th. (14) Care plans were not completed for 17th, 18th, 19th or 20th. (15) Repositioning charts were incomplete or poor for 16th, 17th, 18th and 19th. (16) The handling assessment was not completed for 16th, 18th, 19th or 20th. (17) No food chart was completed for her entire time in AMU. (18) She had pressure damage to her hips and bottom. (19) No daily oral assessment was completed for her entire time on AMU. (20) She was not weighed. (21) The malnutrition tool was not completed. (22) Her bowel movements were not recorded. (24) NEWS scores of 4 to 9 had not been escalated to doctors nor filled in on her drug chart. PLUS (25) No personal care over the weekend of 18th and 19th. (26) No senior review over that weekend. (27) Not written up for her Sertraline, therefore not given (28) Not written up for any food supplements until 21st October. (29) She should have been specialled, but wasn’t. Once again AMU has been found to be chaotic and not fit for purpose. ”

    Source location

    Mrs. Evelyn KENNEDY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    James Paul COLTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    James Paul COLTON was a serving prisoner who became critically unwell on 29 August 2013 after a period of deteriorating health and died two days later in hospital. Concerns included failure to revisit his diagnosis or escalate treatment, inadequate analgesia, poor continuity and communication of care, and an extremely heavy workload affecting healthcare provision.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide prescribed analgesia when required

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The procedure and processes for providing Mr Colton with adequate analgesia were defective and there were occasions when Mr Colton did not receive Tramadol to control his pain. This meant that his last days in prison were distressing and increasingly painful for him to the extent that he was at times unable to get off his bed to receive medication. ”

    Source location

    James Paul COLTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    ALBERT FLYNN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Albert Flynn, a resident of Appleton Manor Residential Home, was taken to hospital with a suspected deep vein thrombosis and treated with the blood-thinning drug Enoxaparin. The following night he was left in a chair for approximately 10 hours without food, fluids or prescribed medication, while staff were unable to rouse him. He was suffering from a severe cerebral bleed, which was fatal; concerns included inadequate staff training and failure to recognise the significance of his condition and recent blood-thinning treatment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to administer prescribed medication

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Whilst the care staff members were apparently concerned as to the condition of Mr Flynn, none of them was sufficiently well trained or qualified to make an informed decision as to how he should be treated. 2. As a result of the above, he was left sitting in a chair, partially dressed, without food, fluid or medication for a period of approximately 10 hours. 3. None of the staff gave any indication of any, or any proper, training in the assessment of this type of event, nor did they attribute any or any sufficient weight to the fact that he had been administered blood thinning drugs the previous day. 4. The staff did not seem to appreciate the importance of administering prescribed medication. ”

    Source location

    ALBERT FLYNN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide additional training and competency assessment to the senior carer involved in the incident.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The importance of medication being provided at the appropriate time is something that is contained in the routine training and competency assessments undertaken by staff and repeated at annual intervals but conducted more frequently should individual concerns be raised. Senior carer staff involved in this incident will undergo additional training and competency assessment to support her awareness.”

    Source location

    2014-0308-Response-by-Lester-Aldridge-LLP
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 July 2014

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026