Recurring concern

Inadequate safeguards against misuse of medicines with abuse potential

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 8 May 2018•Latest report 4 Dec 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes prescribing, repeat-prescribing, replacement-prescription, monitoring, review or escalation controls specifically intended to identify and manage misuse or abuse risks for medicines with abuse potential, including where a patient's substance-use history is relevant.

Not included

  • Excludes ordinary prescribing errors, dose or formulation mistakes and drug interactions where misuse or abuse risk is not the identified unsafe condition.
  • Excludes excessive medication quantities unless the report specifically links them to controlling misuse or abuse risk rather than quantity governance alone.
  • Excludes physical medication-security failures involving storage or unauthorised access where prescribing or clinical misuse-risk controls are not deficient.
  • Excludes generic incident investigation, documentation or governance failures unless they directly concern management of misuse or abuse risk for a medicine.
Reports
14

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
17

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2018–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
44

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board2
Addison House Surgery1
Alvaston Medical Centre1
Brinnington Surgery1
Department of Health and Social Care1
Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1
Limehouse Practice1
NHS Brighton and Hove Clinical Commissioning Group1
NHS South Yorkshire Integrated Care Board1
NHS Surrey and Sussex Integrated Care Board1
North Laine Medical Centre1
Petroc Group Practice1
Royal College of General Practitioners1
The Village Medical Centre1
Tredegar Practice1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. South Yorkshire (Eastern)

    AI-generated summary

    Samuel Martin BROWN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Samuel Martin BROWN, a 29-year-old male, was found deceased at Elliott Court, Rotherham, on 30 March 2025; the inquest conclusion was drug-related death due to drug intoxication. The principal concern was that primary care prescribing did not identify potential addiction and drug-seeking behaviour or adequately review whether medications were still required.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of the primary care prescribing regime to identify potential addiction and drug-seeking behaviour

    Wider context from the report

    “As the commissioners for primary care services I am concerned that the prescribing regime in primary care did not identify potential addiction and drug seeking behaviour or review medications with a view to checking they are actually required. ”

    Source location

    Samuel Martin BROWN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review existing guidance on recording drug-seeking behaviour in clinical records and sharing flags through the Summary Care Record.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS SY ICB have previously collaborated with NHSE to develop guidance for practices on how to record on their clinical system records, when a patient has been identified as having drug seeking behaviour. This is then visible to other healthcare services via the Summary Care Record (SCR) and can be used as a flag to healthcare professionals such as Out of Hours services and community pharmacies who may receive requests from patients and”

    Source location

    Response from NHS South Yorkshire Integrated Care Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Circulate the reviewed drug-seeking-behaviour guidance to practices through bulletins and the website.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “prevent inappropriate prescribing / supply of medicines. We are undertaking a review of the previous guidance and will then circulate to practices, include in bulletins / website.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS South Yorkshire Integrated Care Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 8 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review of 2022–2025 prescribing data found no outlying opioid-prescribing concerns at the relevant practices.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The ICB must assist NHS England’s (NHSE) controlled drug accountable officer (CDAO) to carry out its functions under the Controlled Drugs (Supervision of Management and Use) Regulations 2013. We have undertaken a further review of the prescribing data provided by NHSE for the practices where the patient was registered covering 2022-2025 which has not identified any outlying concerns for opioid medicines. No incidents relating to controlled drugs have been reported to NHS SY ICB or NHSE”

    Source location

    Response from NHS South Yorkshire Integrated Care Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 December 2025

    Open published response
  2. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Mark Alan Smith · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mark Alan Smith was found deceased at home on 5 March 2024 after ingesting large quantities of prescription medication, including Mirtazapine and Pregabalin, together with a significant quantity of alcohol. The report identified a lack of GP policies or procedures for reviewing medication quantities prescribed to vulnerable patients with histories of addiction, self-harm, suicidal ideation or prescription medication overdose, and stated that this failure probably contributed more than minimally to the death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of medication review controls for repeat prescriptions to vulnerable patients with histories of addiction, self-harm, suicidal ideation or prescription medication overdose

    Wider context from the report

    “Evidence was received from two GP Partners at Mr Smith’s GP Practice. Both GPs confirmed that at the time of Mr Smith’s involvement with the Practice continuing up to and including the date of the inquest, there continued to be no system, policy or process in place, to ensure that vulnerable patients with a history of addiction and/or self-harm and/or suicidal ideation and/or prescription medication overdose received or receive appropriate medication reviews to consider the frequency and volume of repeat prescribed medication. It was conceded, accordingly, that there was - and remained - no policy or procedure in place to mitigate the clear risk involved in GPs prescribing unnecessarily excessive quantities of (potentially dangerous) prescription medication (at inappropriate frequency) to a clearly vulnerable cohort of patients, and therefore no policy or procedure is in place to minimise the danger of stockpiling of such medications and the concomitant risk of potentially fatal, (advertent or inadvertent), misuse of such medication. ”

    Source location

    Mark Alan Smith · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit all registered patients coded at risk of self-harm or suicide and receiving repeat medication, complete medication and risk reviews, and restrict repeats to seven-day supplies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Immediate High-Risk Patient Review: A full audit of all patients registered at Addison House Surgery, coded at risk of self-harm/suicide and on repeat medications. Identified patients have had medication/risk reviews by the pharmacists with restriction of repeat medications to seven-day periods.”

    Source location

    Response from Addison House Health Centre
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 September 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the Polypharmacy and High-Risk Prescribing Policy to require pharmacist review of relevant correspondence, seven-day high-risk medication supplies, and three-monthly or earlier reviews for high-risk patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Practice has updated and strengthened the risk assessment provisions of repeat prescribing for identified patients with self-harm or suicide risk as well as monitoring of same with enhanced medication reviews/risk assessments.”

    Source location

    Response from Addison House Health Centre
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 September 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The practice disputes that no safety controls existed, stating its repeat prescribing policy already contained restrictions for inappropriate high-risk medication requests.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There were safety provisions within the Practice’s repeat prescribing policy at the time of late Mark Smith’s death with multiple documented restrictions of inappropriate high risk medication requests by Mr Smith.”

    Source location

    Response from Addison House Health Centre
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 September 2025

    Open published response
  3. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Mr. Kurnathy · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr. Kurnathy was found unresponsive at home on 9 May 2024 and was pronounced dead; autopsy confirmed acute left ventricular failure, with fentanyl and morphine toxicity contributing to the death. Four fentanyl patches were found on his back, exceeding the prescribed amount. The principal concern was that correspondence reporting excessive fentanyl use was not identified by the surgery and did not trigger a medication review, and that the surgery had no specific procedures for flagging or reviewing concerns about fentanyl abuse.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of specific policies or procedures to flag or review fentanyl abuse

    Wider context from the report

    “This report of excessive fentanyl use outside of the prescribed regime was not identified by the Surgery upon receipt of the letter and did not trigger a medication review for Mr Chetty. I am concerned that the correspondence triage did not identify this excessive use of a controlled drug which is known to cause fatalities if abused. I am further concerned that there are no specific policies or procedures within the Surgery to flag up or review concerns around fentanyl abuse. As a known recipient of this and other strong opiate medication, all correspondence received by the surgery relating to Mr. Chetty’s treatment and care had the potential to reveal important information about his ability to self-manage his medication. ”

    Source location

    Mr. Kurnathy · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Amend incoming-correspondence handling so administrative staff identify controlled-drug prescriptions and ensure prompt GP review without routing letters to absent GPs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Practice has amended its process in relation to incoming letters. Every letter that is received is reviewed by the administrative staff. They now check EMIS (the electronic records system) to check whether there is flag indicating if the patient is prescribed a controlled drug (CD). If a patient is prescribed a CD, then the letter is now reviewed by a GP the same day or the following working day at the latest. The duty GP or another GP working that day will review any letter relating to a patient that is taking a CD even if the content of the letter does not relate to the CD. Furthermore, the system is such that the incoming correspondence is not sent to a GP if they are on annual leave or they are not in the Practice for a few days.”

    Source location

    Response from The Brinnington Surgery
    Page 1 · response
    Published 15 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create and implement a workflow map linking incoming correspondence types to relevant protocols and controlled-drug GP-review requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Practice has created a workflow process map (enclosed) which now links to the individual protocol for each type of letter. This map shows what the incoming correspondence process is for each type of letter which now includes the requirement for a GP to review all incoming letters if a patient is prescribed a CD.”

    Source location

    Response from The Brinnington Surgery
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a prescribing protocol containing a specific policy on controlled-drug misuse.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Steps have been taken to address the issues raised above. This was discussed at the SEA meeting on 15 November 2024 and will be incorporated into future meetings. The importance of accurate prescribing is now included during inductions with junior doctors. Representatives from the practice pharmacy team were present at this meeting and were involved in the discussions. Prescribing will also be discussed at subsequent meetings. The GPs have undertaken training provided by EMIS in relation to repeat prescriptions. Further discussions took place on 17 January 2025. A new prescribing protocol is in development which was discussed at this meeting. This will include a specific policy on CD misuse. The Practice is also developing an alert within EMIS to ensure all prescribers adhere to the new system.”

    Source location

    Response from The Brinnington Surgery
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop an EMIS alert to support prescriber adherence to the new prescribing system.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Steps have been taken to address the issues raised above. This was discussed at the SEA meeting on 15 November 2024 and will be incorporated into future meetings. The importance of accurate prescribing is now included during inductions with junior doctors. Representatives from the practice pharmacy team were present at this meeting and were involved in the discussions. Prescribing will also be discussed at subsequent meetings. The GPs have undertaken training provided by EMIS in relation to repeat prescriptions. Further discussions took place on 17 January 2025. A new prescribing protocol is in development which was discussed at this meeting. This will include a specific policy on CD misuse. The Practice is also developing an alert within EMIS to ensure all prescribers adhere to the new system.”

    Source location

    Response from The Brinnington Surgery
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 November 2024

    Open published response
  4. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Paul Michael Clark · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Paul Michael Clark was found unresponsive at home on 12 May 2024 and died from drug toxicity; the inquest concluded that the death was accidental. The principal concern was that opioid painkillers were prescribed despite his documented previous heroin addiction, without evidence that the risks of reintroducing opioids were considered or monitored, and he subsequently became addicted and took increasing amounts, including non-prescribed opioids.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to monitor patients with former opioid addiction prescribed opioid painkillers

    Wider context from the report

    “The inquest heard evidence that Paul Clark had previously been addicted to heroin. He had been successful in treating his opioid addiction and had remained opioid free for many years. His previous problems with opioids and the risks of opioids for him were well documented within his medical notes. However despite the risks opioid painkillers presented to him he had been started in primary care on opioid based painkillers for reported pain. He had become addicted to them and took them at increasing levels topping them up with non-prescribed opioids. There was no evidence before the inquest that the inherent risks of reintroducing opioids to someone who had previously been addicted to them were considered or monitored. It was accepted in evidence that whilst opioid painkillers can be helpful for treating some patients the risks of treating a patient with a former opioid addiction with opioids were significant and that there needed to be a very well thought out rationale with careful monitoring to avoid increasing the chances of a patient relapsing into addiction through GP prescribed medication and that it was essential that GPs considered this when prescribing. ”

    Source location

    Paul Michael Clark · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to consider the risks of prescribing opioids to patients with former opioid addiction

    Wider context from the report

    “The inquest heard evidence that Paul Clark had previously been addicted to heroin. He had been successful in treating his opioid addiction and had remained opioid free for many years. His previous problems with opioids and the risks of opioids for him were well documented within his medical notes. However despite the risks opioid painkillers presented to him he had been started in primary care on opioid based painkillers for reported pain. He had become addicted to them and took them at increasing levels topping them up with non-prescribed opioids. There was no evidence before the inquest that the inherent risks of reintroducing opioids to someone who had previously been addicted to them were considered or monitored. It was accepted in evidence that whilst opioid painkillers can be helpful for treating some patients the risks of treating a patient with a former opioid addiction with opioids were significant and that there needed to be a very well thought out rationale with careful monitoring to avoid increasing the chances of a patient relapsing into addiction through GP prescribed medication and that it was essential that GPs considered this when prescribing. ”

    Source location

    Paul Michael Clark · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create, disseminate and use a seven-minute briefing based on learning from the Regulation 28 report.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Regulation 28 report and our response will also be shared, in January 2025, for system learning with the GM cross-sector medicines safety group - the IPMO Medicines Safety Group. This group reports to the Greater Manchester Medicines Management Group (GMMG) and is co-chaired by NHS GM and Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (MFT). The intention is to reflect on any learning from the Regulation 28 report and create a 7-minute briefing to be produced, disseminated to clinical staff and used for shared learning.”

    Source location

    Response from GMIC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver opioid-prescribing masterclass training to Stockport GPs and clinicians.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to support our wider GP population, a Masterclass presentation on the subject of opioid prescribing was delivered to Stockport GPs and clinicians on 12 September 2024. The session title was ‘Pain Transformation, IMPS and Opioid Stewardship’. A total of 62 clinicians attended the session which was delivered by Dr Thomas Walton, Consultant in Anaesthesia and Pain Management.”

    Source location

    Response from GMIC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish and maintain continuing professional development updates on opioid use disorder, medicine dependence, withdrawal symptoms and opioid reduction.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Continuing Professional Development”

    Source location

    Response from RCGP
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop, launch and widely circulate a repeat-prescribing toolkit supporting safer, collaborative prescribing processes and addressing opioid-prescribing safety concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Clinical Policy”

    Source location

    Response from RCGP
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 October 2024

    Open published response
  5. Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

    AI-generated summary

    Louise Helen Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Louise Helen Jones was found deceased at home on 1 October 2023. The inquest recorded respiratory depression and opiate drug use, following an unintentional overdose involving morphine and bromazalam alongside other central nervous system depressant drugs. Concerns included the absence of an agreed opioid treatment and end-of-treatment plan, practice policies for long-term opioid prescribing and opioid–benzodiazepine co-prescribing, and warning flags after three months of morphine prescription.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of practice warning flags at the three-month stage of morphine prescribing

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) There were no warning flags in place at the practice at the 3-month stage of morphine prescription, to reflect the MHRA/CHM advice referred to in NICE guidance, regarding the increased risk of addiction beyond this period. ”

    Source location

    Louise Helen Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Tracy Frances MCCARTHY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Tracy McCarthy was found deceased at home on 17 July 2023 and died from long-term misuse of amitriptyline; the inquest conclusion was a drug-related death, with amitriptyline toxicity and coronary artery disease recorded. The concerns included prescribing amitriptyline above the maximum suggested dose, failure to flag the overdose risk and stop or appropriately manage the prescription, and changing from daily to monthly prescriptions despite recognised risks.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Prescribing of amitriptyline above the maximum suggested dose for a patient known to be dependent on it

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Although Amitriptyline is not generally regarded as a drug of abuse, Ms McCarthy was known to be dependent on it. She had been prescribed Amitriptyline for many years, and at one stage in or about 2022, she was regularly prescribed ████████ mg per day, which is over the maximum suggested dose in the BNF (150mg per day). In addition, the BNF provides a clear warning (as did the prescribing/records software in use at The Tredegar Practice) that Amitriptyline prescribed for depression (which it was in this case), is “not recommended – increased risk of fatality in overdose”. A GP from The Tredegar Practice told me that ████████ mg was an “unacceptable dose”. The concern being that guidelines were not followed, particularly in relation to a patient known to be dependent and where use of Amitriptyline was not recommended for the presenting condition in any event. ”

    Source location

    Tracy Frances MCCARTHY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Glenn Anthony LOCKWOOD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Glenn Anthony Lockwood, a known drug user receiving opiate replacement treatment, was found unresponsive after a suspected overdose on 14 April 2023 and later suffered a cardiac arrest. Despite hospital treatment, he died on 2 June 2023; the inquest concluded that his death was drug related, with mixed drug toxicity recorded as the medical cause. Concerns included whether Pregabalin abuse risks were sufficiently monitored and whether prescribing and record-keeping issues had been fully investigated and addressed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to monitor Pregabalin for signs of abuse

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Mr Lockwood’s drug treatment provider wrote to his GP in August 2021 to advise caution “with regard to other medicines with potential for abuse.” According to the British National Formulary, Pregabalin should be monitored for “signs of abuse”. The evidence I received did not reassure me that sufficient steps were taken to monitor for signs of Pregabalin abuse, particularly in a patient with known history of drug abuse. (2) The statement received from Mr Lockwood’s GP alluded to the fact that there were possible record keeping and prescribing issues surrounding Mr Lockwood’s prescriptions for Pregabalin. As a result, a Serious Event Analysis was conducted. In response to written queries from me, The Limehouse Practice responded by email on 14 November 2023. That email alluded to potential errors within the Serious Event Analysis and stated that the Serious Event Analysis would be re-opened and revisited. As such, I am not reassured that relevant risks have fully explored and/or any required action(s) taken. ”

    Source location

    Glenn Anthony LOCKWOOD · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce three-monthly face-to-face reviews for patients prescribed dependence-inducing medicines, including Pregabalin, gabapentin, benzodiazepines and oxycodone.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. We will ensure 3 monthly face to face reviews for patients on Pregabalin, gabapentin, benzodiazepines, oxycodone and other dependence inducing medications.”

    Source location

    Response from The Limehouse Practice
    Page 3 · response
    Published 6 December 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review identified patients’ medication and discuss with RESET whether it should prescribe their opiate substitute and other dependence-potential medicines.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. We are carrying out a search to identify all patients on Pregabalin/diazepam or similar medications who are also prescribed opiate substitute treatment, either at RESET or in shared care. We will carry out a medication review for those patients and discuss with RESET and”

    Source location

    Response from The Limehouse Practice
    Page 3 · response
    Published 6 December 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    There had been no previous early requests or concerns about Pregabalin misuse before the mistaken early-request concern arose.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Until December 2022, Mr Lockwood continued to receive prescriptions for Pregabalin at four weekly intervals when the duration was changed to two weekly. There had been no previous incidences of early requesting of Pregabalin, or concerns that the patient was misusing or over-using this medication.”

    Source location

    Response from The Limehouse Practice
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 December 2023

    Open published response
  8. Derby and Derbyshire

    AI-generated summary

    Maria Susan McGAURAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Maria Susan McGAURAN had been prescribed codeine and citalopram and died at home on 28 November 2018 due to the combined toxicity of those medications. Concerns were raised that she had hoarded and taken medication erratically, but the Surgery did not undertake a requested medication review or consider alternative pain management earlier.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to undertake a medication review in response to known excessive, hoarded and erratic medication use

    Wider context from the report

    “Ms McGauran had over several years been known to take excessive amounts of her codeine prescription medication. She had a history of hoarding medication and taking her medication erratically. Her family raised concerns with the Surgery as to her reliance on several differing medications. They requested that a review of her medications be undertaken. No such review was undertaken. The Surgery could have considered alternative pain management aids at an earlier stage (such as the Fentanyl patches considered only 1 month before death i.e. in October 2018) so as to prevent the risks of overdose. ”

    Source location

    Maria Susan McGAURAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Recruit two clinical pharmacists to support patient medication reviews.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. Taking advantage of the expanding job roles within primary care, over the period January to February 2021, Alvaston Medical Centre recruited two clinical pharmacists to undergo patient medication reviews. The clinical pharmacist's area of professional expertise means they are ideally suited to conducting structured medication reviews of patients – including extensive knowledge of controlled drugs. As part of the medication review, they explore the patient’s compliance and understanding of their medication, along with addressing other concerns within their remit.”

    Source location

    2022-0098-Response-from-Alvaston-Medical-Centre_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct structured, holistic medication reviews covering compliance, understanding, social history, lifestyle and medication changes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. Taking advantage of the expanding job roles within primary care, over the period January to February 2021, Alvaston Medical Centre recruited two clinical pharmacists to undergo patient medication reviews. The clinical pharmacist's area of professional expertise means they are ideally suited to conducting structured medication reviews of patients – including extensive knowledge of controlled drugs. As part of the medication review, they explore the patient’s compliance and understanding of their medication, along with addressing other concerns within their remit.”

    Source location

    2022-0098-Response-from-Alvaston-Medical-Centre_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Prevent high-risk scheduled drugs from forming part of repeat prescriptions wherever possible.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. Alvaston has also made it good practice, to ensure wherever possible, any high risk scheduled drugs do not form part of the repeat prescription. Furthermore, we have a robust system in place to ensure the prescribing of medications is not automatically ordered too far in advance of their due date. This reduces the risk of any patient's 'stock-piling' medication. This is an ongoing project that is constantly being reviewed and refined, and we continue to further assess which areas or medications would benefit from additional surveillance during the prescribing and issuing of the prescription.”

    Source location

    2022-0098-Response-from-Alvaston-Medical-Centre_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Prevent prescriptions from being ordered automatically too far in advance of their due dates.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. Alvaston has also made it good practice, to ensure wherever possible, any high risk scheduled drugs do not form part of the repeat prescription. Furthermore, we have a robust system in place to ensure the prescribing of medications is not automatically ordered too far in advance of their due date. This reduces the risk of any patient's 'stock-piling' medication. This is an ongoing project that is constantly being reviewed and refined, and we continue to further assess which areas or medications would benefit from additional surveillance during the prescribing and issuing of the prescription.”

    Source location

    2022-0098-Response-from-Alvaston-Medical-Centre_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue assessing medications and prescribing areas that would benefit from additional surveillance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. Alvaston has also made it good practice, to ensure wherever possible, any high risk scheduled drugs do not form part of the repeat prescription. Furthermore, we have a robust system in place to ensure the prescribing of medications is not automatically ordered too far in advance of their due date. This reduces the risk of any patient's 'stock-piling' medication. This is an ongoing project that is constantly being reviewed and refined, and we continue to further assess which areas or medications would benefit from additional surveillance during the prescribing and issuing of the prescription.”

    Source location

    2022-0098-Response-from-Alvaston-Medical-Centre_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 April 2022

    Open published response
  9. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Steven Terence Allen · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Steven Terence Allen was found unresponsive at home on 25 October 2020, and toxicology found a fatal level of prescribed medication; the medical cause of death was recorded as combined drug toxicity. Concerns included prescribing oxycodone and other medications despite a history of addiction, self-harm and poor use of substances, with telephone consultations during Covid-19 and additional replacement prescriptions sometimes issued with little challenge.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to adequately challenge additional replacement prescriptions

    Wider context from the report

    “The inquest heard that he had a chaotic lifestyle and a history of drug addiction. He was in significant pain and was prescribed medication to manage his pain including oxycodone. He was prescribed this and additional medications although there was a history of addiction, self-harm and poor use of prescribed and illicit substances. Prescribing of these medications was done through telephone consultations due to Covid 19 and on occasion additional replacement prescriptions were given with little challenge. ”

    Source location

    Steven Terence Allen · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to account for addiction, self-harm and poor substance use when prescribing medication

    Wider context from the report

    “The inquest heard that he had a chaotic lifestyle and a history of drug addiction. He was in significant pain and was prescribed medication to manage his pain including oxycodone. He was prescribed this and additional medications although there was a history of addiction, self-harm and poor use of prescribed and illicit substances. Prescribing of these medications was done through telephone consultations due to Covid 19 and on occasion additional replacement prescriptions were given with little challenge. ”

    Source location

    Steven Terence Allen · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue discussions with Primary Care Network leads to explore Stockport Integrated Pharmacy Service support for optimising medication reviews.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The Medicines Management Team is currently in discussion with the Primary Care Network (PCN) Leads to explore how the Stockport Integrated Pharmacy Service (SIPS) can support GP Practices in optimising medication reviews for this patient cohort.”

    Source location

    2021-0190-Response-from-Stockport-Clinical-Commissioning-Group-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 June 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind Stockport GPs about available opioid-prescribing resources and how to seek support through the next pharmacy newsletter.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Greater Manchester Medicines Management Group (GMMMG) Opioid Prescribing for Chronic Pain: Resource Pack”

    Source location

    2021-0190-Response-from-Stockport-Clinical-Commissioning-Group-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 June 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing prescribing guidance and clinician adherence are considered sufficient because the incident is regarded as isolated.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Practice take on board the comments included within the Regulation 28 Report and have undertaken a review of this case and looked at their processes for the management of prescribing for patients in this vulnerable cohort. The practice are satisfied that this was an isolated case and that all clinicians do adhere to guidance in relation to informed prescribing and support of this patient group.”

    Source location

    2021-0190-Response-from-Stockport-Clinical-Commissioning-Group-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 June 2021

    Open published response
  10. County Durham and Darlington

    AI-generated summary

    Laura Eve PARSONS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Laura Eve Parsons was found dead at home on 5 November 2019, after consuming a fatal amount of liquid morphine prescribed for breakthrough cancer pain. She had previously been admitted to hospital following an accidental morphine overdose, but a repeat prescription was later issued without the electronic prescribing system directing the prescriber to review the prominent medical-record information about that overdose.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to scrutinise repeat prescription requests

    Wider context from the report

    “Ms Parsons was prescribed liquid morphine to treat ‘break through’ pain for cancer. It was first prescribed on 9th August 2019. Ms Parsons was admitted to hospital on 10th August 2019 with an accidental overdose of morphine. It appears 180mls were consumed in a 12 hour period. She recovered and was discharged from hospital. The remainder of the prescribed morphine was discarded. On 31st October 2019 Ms Parsons requested a repeat prescription of liquid morphine from her GP surgery. This was authorised and a 500ml bottle of liquid morphine was dispensed to Ms Parsons. On 5th November 2019 Ms Parsons was found dead due to ingesting a fatal amount of morphine. At inquest evidence was given that information such as recent overdose would be added to the ‘Active Problems’ section on a person’s medical records and would be prominent when any clinician accessed that person’s records. It was explained at inquest that when a patient applies for a repeat prescription so far as the request is within the permitted timescale to issue a repeat of the prescribed item, then the prescription would be issued without any further scrutiny and the electronic systems would not take a prescriber to the patient’s medical records and in particular the ‘Active Problems’ section. ”

    Source location

    Laura Eve PARSONS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026