Recurring concern

Inadequate management of pressure ulcers

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 20 Aug 2013•Latest report 12 Mar 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of controls specifically dedicated to pressure-ulcer prevention and management, including risk assessment, prevention measures, clinical assessment, treatment, monitoring, specialist referral, equipment, repositioning and escalation across community and inpatient care.

Not included

  • Excludes generic wound-care deficiencies where pressure ulcers are not materially identified.
  • Excludes generic staffing, training, documentation or communication failures unless they directly impair pressure-ulcer prevention or management.
  • Excludes management of wounds caused by other mechanisms, including impact injuries, unless the report explicitly connects them to pressure-ulcer care.
  • Excludes unrelated delays, discharge or treatment failures where pressure-ulcer management is not the shared unsafe condition.
Reports
51

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
106

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
135

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Care Quality Commission7
Department of Health and Social Care4
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board3
East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust2
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust2
Aneurin Bevan University LHB1
Angel Solutions (UK) Ltd1
Barchester Healthcare Limited1
Bargoed Care Home1
Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust1
Beech Dene Residential Care Home1
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust1
Brunswick Ward at Lindridge1
Bryntirion Surgery1
Care First Homes1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. North London

    AI-generated summary

    Albert Thomas Bellingham · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Albert Thomas Bellingham died in hospital on 10 November 2024 from bacteraemia associated with an infected sacral pressure sore that developed after his admission following a fall. The principal concern was inadequate preventative nursing care, with the inquest concluding that neglect in treating the sacral sore contributed to his death; the report also raises consideration of guidance and training for doctors working in care homes.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of appropriate training for doctors working in care homes when dealing with pressure sores

    Wider context from the report

    “Consideration of guidance to support interventionalist, supervisory role with appropriate training for doctors working in care homes when dealing with pressure sore. ”

    Source location

    Albert Thomas Bellingham · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of guidance supporting an interventionalist supervisory role when dealing with pressure sores

    Wider context from the report

    “Consideration of guidance to support interventionalist, supervisory role with appropriate training for doctors working in care homes when dealing with pressure sore. ”

    Source location

    Albert Thomas Bellingham · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NHS England is responsible for addressing concerns about pressure sore guidance and training for doctors working in care homes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In considering your report, officials within the Department of Health and Social Care have made enquiries with NHS England and concluded that these concerns are more appropriately addressed by NHS England directly. I am advised that NHS England will therefore provide you with a full and comprehensive response on the concerns you have raised.”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 April 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Routine pressure-ulcer assessment, treatment and dressing care ordinarily fall to appropriately trained nursing staff and other relevant clinicians, not GPs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The direct assessment and treatment of pressure ulcers, including routine wound care and dressing management, would ordinarily fall within the professional responsibilities of appropriately trained nursing staff and other relevant clinicians. GPs are not generally responsible for the delivery or supervision of routine dressing care; however, they remain responsible for providing medical care to their patients and may contribute to the assessment, management and escalation of the resident's underlying clinical condition where clinically appropriate.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 April 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing NICE guidance applies to doctors in care homes and provides the primary national framework for pressure-ulcer prevention and management.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There is currently no single, unified, accessible guidance document specifically addressed to doctors working in care home settings, that sets out the expected supervisory and interventionist role in relation to pressure ulcers. However, NICE Clinical Guideline CG179 ‘Pressure ulcers: prevention and management’ (2014, last updated in 2024) provides the primary national clinical framework for the prevention and management of pressure ulcers across all healthcare and social care settings, including care homes. The guideline applies to all registered professionals involved in patient care, including doctors, and covers:”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 April 2026

    Open published response
  2. East Sussex

    AI-generated summary

    David Joseph DUGDALE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    David Joseph Dugdale was admitted to hospital in January 2024, sustained bilateral hip fractures and developed a pressure sore, before undergoing surgery and dying on 19 May 2024. Concerns included inadequate pain management, insufficient nutritional support, deterioration of the pressure sore to grade 4, and poor nursing care, including soiled dressings and the sore being left exposed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide adequate pressure sore care

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The pressure sore deteriorated to grade 4 during his admission which was a direct cause of his death. He was often found lying in soiled dressings with his pressure sore exposed and in pain by his visiting carers. ”

    Source location

    David Joseph DUGDALE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use the electronic pressure-ulcer audit tool for monthly ward audits and monitor compliance against prevention and management criteria.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As such there have been several actions that have since been undertaken since April 2024 to achieve and maintain long term effectiveness with our improvements. These have been led by the Pressure Ulcer Steering Group (PUSG) and the Tissue Viability Specialist Nurses. We have identified areas for improvement including maternity, elective care, and gateway areas. A new electronic audit tool was designed and implemented in August 2025 after a pilot, whereby audits are now undertaken monthly by each ward auditing a minimum of 20 patients.”

    Source location

    Response from East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 9 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver mandatory and essential wound-care training, including pressure-ulcer prevention, human factors, and simulated patient-safety scenarios for relevant clinical staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We also worked in partnership with NHS Sussex and other health care providers in Sussex to agree a mandatory framework for education and training related to wound care for clinical staff including pressure ulcers in line with the National Wound Care Strategy Programme (NWCSP). This includes eLearning and face to face taught elements and different tiers or levels of training are required for staff in different roles (attachment D). The Tissue Viability Nurses also provide face to face training as part of the mandatory induction and preceptorship training for newly qualified or new to Trust nurses. In addition to the mandatory training, the Trust has also introduced essential training days for clinical staff which provides training in human factors and simulated scenarios related to patient safety, for a blended and interactive approach to learning.”

    Source location

    Response from East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 9 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue targeted face-to-face pressure-ulcer training, circulate wound-care learning newsletters and webinars, and provide recurring ward study sessions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Tissue Viability Nurses regularly provide targeted face to face training in wards and departments where requested. These can be ad hoc in response to incidents or identified knowledge gaps by department leads or on pre-planned routine ward study days with several topics covered, similar to BETU ward. Wards such as Cuckmere ward have received face to face training sessions, with some receiving ongoing 1-hour sessions monthly and pressure ulcer training every 2 months. BETU ward have introduced PFD focused study days in 2025/26 which include 2-hour face to face pressure ulcers sessions. The training being provided also incorporates the Pressure Ulcer Prevention Policy update, dated 15/10/2025 (attachment E), the review of Nevercentre pressure ulcer documentation and the importance of medical photography in supporting pressure ulcer management and surveillance.”

    Source location

    Response from East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 9 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Undertake a formal evaluation of the Trust mandatory training framework during 2026–27 and seek approval for resulting training changes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of the QI project commissioned by the Pressure Ulcer Steering Group (PUSG) on Benson and Egerton Trauma Unit (BETU), additional bitesize face to face training has been piloted on the ward and on bespoke study days. The feedback and evaluation have been positive and reported back to the PUSG with a strong preference for face-to-face learning compared to mandatory eLearning. In turn PUSG requested the NHS Sussex Wound Care Group undertake an evaluation of the mandatory training framework, however the group disbanded in early 2026. As a result, the PUSG is planning to undertake a formal evaluation”

    Source location

    Response from East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 9 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue Trust-wide pressure-ulcer prevention work through category monitoring, monthly audits, CQUIN compliance oversight, and Pressure Ulcer Steering Group governance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Alongside the above, the PUSG plans several educational and promotional events for staff and patients during national ‘Stop the Pressure Week’ in November. These events rotate between hospital sites and community locations to encourage a range of attendees from all settings. The programme of events for these days is planned and coordinated by the tissue viability team and are designed to meet the most recent priorities or areas for improvement identified by learning from incidents and Inquests (attachments F&G). A programme of work/activity is developed annually by the Trust Pressure Ulcer Steering Group (PUSG) to reduce risk of pressure damage based on learning from previous incidents, Inquests, audit findings and national guidance and recommendations.”

    Source location

    Response from East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 9 January 2026

    Open published response
  3. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Ramona Doreen Harbott · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ramona Doreen Harbott was admitted to Windmill Manor Care Home with very limited mobility and a high risk of pressure sores. She developed serious sacral and heel pressure sores, and later died in hospital from sepsis having contracted pneumonia. Concerns included inadequate repositioning, skin monitoring, pressure sore treatment and record keeping, with improvements still ongoing and not yet completed and audited.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete and audit improvements to pressure sore prevention and management

    Wider context from the report

    “a. The evidence heard by the court indicated that though the care home had policies and guidance for the prevention and management of bed sores that was not followed by on-site care or nursing staff. Although at high risk of pressure sores Mrs Harbott was not regularly repositioned until she had developed a sacral sore. Her skin condition was not monitored and recorded to the extent that though the sore was apparently being treated, it had become an unstageable necrotic wound by the time she was taken to hospital. The serious pressure sore on the right heel was not documented until it was seen on 23 January 2025 although it was likely well established for at least a week. b. The coroner acknowledges that Barchester Health Care have since this death and the inquest hearing in November 2025 commenced an action plan of improvements including greater regional management oversight however the coroner remains concerned that the matters identified at the inquest regarding issues surrounding early and appropriate assessment of risk, use of preventative measures, skin monitoring, pressure sore treatment and record keeping are the subject of ongoing improvement which has yet to be completed and audited. ”

    Source location

    Ramona Doreen Harbott · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete early and appropriate pressure sore risk assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “a. The evidence heard by the court indicated that though the care home had policies and guidance for the prevention and management of bed sores that was not followed by on-site care or nursing staff. Although at high risk of pressure sores Mrs Harbott was not regularly repositioned until she had developed a sacral sore. Her skin condition was not monitored and recorded to the extent that though the sore was apparently being treated, it had become an unstageable necrotic wound by the time she was taken to hospital. The serious pressure sore on the right heel was not documented until it was seen on 23 January 2025 although it was likely well established for at least a week. b. The coroner acknowledges that Barchester Health Care have since this death and the inquest hearing in November 2025 commenced an action plan of improvements including greater regional management oversight however the coroner remains concerned that the matters identified at the inquest regarding issues surrounding early and appropriate assessment of risk, use of preventative measures, skin monitoring, pressure sore treatment and record keeping are the subject of ongoing improvement which has yet to be completed and audited. ”

    Source location

    Ramona Doreen Harbott · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide appropriate pressure sore treatment

    Wider context from the report

    “a. The evidence heard by the court indicated that though the care home had policies and guidance for the prevention and management of bed sores that was not followed by on-site care or nursing staff. Although at high risk of pressure sores Mrs Harbott was not regularly repositioned until she had developed a sacral sore. Her skin condition was not monitored and recorded to the extent that though the sore was apparently being treated, it had become an unstageable necrotic wound by the time she was taken to hospital. The serious pressure sore on the right heel was not documented until it was seen on 23 January 2025 although it was likely well established for at least a week. b. The coroner acknowledges that Barchester Health Care have since this death and the inquest hearing in November 2025 commenced an action plan of improvements including greater regional management oversight however the coroner remains concerned that the matters identified at the inquest regarding issues surrounding early and appropriate assessment of risk, use of preventative measures, skin monitoring, pressure sore treatment and record keeping are the subject of ongoing improvement which has yet to be completed and audited. ”

    Source location

    Ramona Doreen Harbott · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to use pressure sore preventative measures

    Wider context from the report

    “a. The evidence heard by the court indicated that though the care home had policies and guidance for the prevention and management of bed sores that was not followed by on-site care or nursing staff. Although at high risk of pressure sores Mrs Harbott was not regularly repositioned until she had developed a sacral sore. Her skin condition was not monitored and recorded to the extent that though the sore was apparently being treated, it had become an unstageable necrotic wound by the time she was taken to hospital. The serious pressure sore on the right heel was not documented until it was seen on 23 January 2025 although it was likely well established for at least a week. b. The coroner acknowledges that Barchester Health Care have since this death and the inquest hearing in November 2025 commenced an action plan of improvements including greater regional management oversight however the coroner remains concerned that the matters identified at the inquest regarding issues surrounding early and appropriate assessment of risk, use of preventative measures, skin monitoring, pressure sore treatment and record keeping are the subject of ongoing improvement which has yet to be completed and audited. ”

    Source location

    Ramona Doreen Harbott · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to monitor residents' skin condition for pressure sores

    Wider context from the report

    “a. The evidence heard by the court indicated that though the care home had policies and guidance for the prevention and management of bed sores that was not followed by on-site care or nursing staff. Although at high risk of pressure sores Mrs Harbott was not regularly repositioned until she had developed a sacral sore. Her skin condition was not monitored and recorded to the extent that though the sore was apparently being treated, it had become an unstageable necrotic wound by the time she was taken to hospital. The serious pressure sore on the right heel was not documented until it was seen on 23 January 2025 although it was likely well established for at least a week. b. The coroner acknowledges that Barchester Health Care have since this death and the inquest hearing in November 2025 commenced an action plan of improvements including greater regional management oversight however the coroner remains concerned that the matters identified at the inquest regarding issues surrounding early and appropriate assessment of risk, use of preventative measures, skin monitoring, pressure sore treatment and record keeping are the subject of ongoing improvement which has yet to be completed and audited. ”

    Source location

    Ramona Doreen Harbott · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record pressure sore risk, skin monitoring and treatment information

    Wider context from the report

    “a. The evidence heard by the court indicated that though the care home had policies and guidance for the prevention and management of bed sores that was not followed by on-site care or nursing staff. Although at high risk of pressure sores Mrs Harbott was not regularly repositioned until she had developed a sacral sore. Her skin condition was not monitored and recorded to the extent that though the sore was apparently being treated, it had become an unstageable necrotic wound by the time she was taken to hospital. The serious pressure sore on the right heel was not documented until it was seen on 23 January 2025 although it was likely well established for at least a week. b. The coroner acknowledges that Barchester Health Care have since this death and the inquest hearing in November 2025 commenced an action plan of improvements including greater regional management oversight however the coroner remains concerned that the matters identified at the inquest regarding issues surrounding early and appropriate assessment of risk, use of preventative measures, skin monitoring, pressure sore treatment and record keeping are the subject of ongoing improvement which has yet to be completed and audited. ”

    Source location

    Ramona Doreen Harbott · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Appoint a Regional Manager to provide increased management oversight.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst some of the actions are completed such as replacement of the General Manager, appointment of a Regional Manager and dismissal of the Deputy Manager, other actions are necessarily part of day-to-day documentation and process which will remain embedded and ongoing to ensure a robust approach to the planning and management of the needs of our residents.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate daily, monthly and bi-monthly audits of care documentation, skin integrity, risk assessments, equipment, interventions and follow-up actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “iii. The General Manager daily walk around of the Home includes ad hoc sampling of resident care records and supporting documentation. This audit tool also directs the General Manager to approach and question both residents, families and staff to identify any concerns. Any actions identified are discussed at the daily stand-up meeting and then carried forward to the next meeting, to ensure review of completion.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue monitoring the safety and quality of care at Windmill Manor.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst we have received assurances about the steps taken to address the concerns, we will continue to monitor the safety and quality of care at Windmill Manor and we are considering any criminal enforcement that may be appropriate in this case. If we identify safety concerns in relation to pressure wound care, we will consider whether an unannounced inspection and/or further regulatory action is required.”

    Source location

    2025-0637 - Response from Quality Care Commission
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Consider whether criminal enforcement is appropriate in this case.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst we have received assurances about the steps taken to address the concerns, we will continue to monitor the safety and quality of care at Windmill Manor and we are considering any criminal enforcement that may be appropriate in this case. If we identify safety concerns in relation to pressure wound care, we will consider whether an unannounced inspection and/or further regulatory action is required.”

    Source location

    2025-0637 - Response from Quality Care Commission
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Carry out daily care-record sampling and monthly documentation audits, with management follow-up of identified actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “iii. The General Manager daily walk around of the Home includes ad hoc sampling of resident care records and supporting documentation. This audit tool also directs the General Manager to approach and question both residents, families and staff to identify any concerns. Any actions identified are discussed at the daily stand-up meeting and then carried forward to the next meeting, to ensure review of completion.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Carry out monthly skin-integrity audits and additional Regional Manager reviews of high-risk residents’ interventions, equipment, care plans and Waterlow scores.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “v. A monthly skin integrity audit is completed by the General Manager which reviews all residents deemed as ‘high’ or ‘very high’ risk of pressure damage. This looks at care interventions and equipment in place, including mattresses and chair cushions. The audit also reviews the care plans and the completion of Waterlow scores in line with the Resident of the Day process. The Regional Manager completes this audit bi-monthly to add increased oversight and safety netting and to identify any further interventions required for residents.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold bi-weekly clinical governance meetings to review high-risk residents, tissue-viability issues, referrals and clinical deterioration.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “vi. In accordance with Barchester procedures the Home holds a monthly clinical governance meeting. Following the appointment of a new General Manager at the”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce and embed the Enable electronic records and case-management system for care documentation and oversight.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Introduction and embedding of electronic records and case management system ‘Enable’.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver reflective sessions and disseminate inquest learning to Home staff on pressure-injury risk, prevention, treatment and documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Post inquest reflective sessions with staff carried out by Regional Manager with focus on the matters of concern raised by you during the inquest and in your findings and conclusion delivered on 8 December 2025.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver staff training, supervision, knowledge checks and refresher sessions on pressure-area care, tissue-viability policy, risk assessment, prevention, skin monitoring, wound treatment and record keeping.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Training and Supervision sessions took place with all staff at the Home on 22nd October 2025, and 18th December 2025 led by the Regional Operational Trainer and Clinical Development Nurse. As previously advised, the training focussed on pressure area care and management of pressure ulcer/wounds. During the training there were refresher sessions on the Barchester Tissue Viability and Skin Tear Policy and specific focus on early and appropriate management of risk, use of preventative measures, skin monitoring, pressure ulcer treatment and record keeping. The Clinical Development Nurse assigned to the Home uses the SSKIN bundle framework approach to promote comprehensive risk assessment, monitoring and care as a tool in pressure ulcer prevention. Early identification of skin compromise through regular checks is reinforced as part of daily care.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide weekly Clinical Development Nurse reviews of skin-integrity risks, care plans, wound assessments, categorisation, referrals and clinical concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The Clinical Development Nurse now visits the Home on a weekly basis to review the approach to the management of risk to skin integrity and care and treatment plans in place where skin damage has been identified for any resident. She checks that wound assessment and categorisation is being completed correctly with review of wounds by staff in person supported by photographs. She attends the daily stand-up meeting during her visit to follow up on assessments and referrals and any clinical concerns. She is also available for advice and assistance to all staff outside these visits and can review concerns on an ‘as needed’ basis. She has reported an improvement overall in the approach of staff and their recognition of the importance of early interventions and comprehensive treatment plans.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide dedicated management and clinical support, daily meetings and escalation of changes in residents’ clinical status through electronic notifications.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “(iii) The General Manager at Windmill Manor Care Home has been provided with dedicated support from the Managing and Regional Directors and the Clinical Development Nurse during the recent period of change at the home. When changes to a resident’s clinical status are identified, including deterioration to skin integrity, these are added to the online systems which immediately notifies the Clinical”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 4 · response
    Published 23 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver pressure-area, wound-management, tissue-viability, risk-assessment, prevention, skin-monitoring and record-keeping training with supervision and knowledge checks for staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Training and Supervision sessions took place with all staff at the Home on 22nd October 2025, and 18th December 2025 led by the Regional Operational Trainer and Clinical Development Nurse. As previously advised, the training focussed on pressure area care and management of pressure ulcer/wounds. During the training there were refresher sessions on the Barchester Tissue Viability and Skin Tear Policy and specific focus on early and appropriate management of risk, use of preventative measures, skin monitoring, pressure ulcer treatment and record keeping. The Clinical Development Nurse assigned to the Home uses the SSKIN bundle framework approach to promote comprehensive risk assessment, monitoring and care as a tool in pressure ulcer prevention. Early identification of skin compromise through regular checks is reinforced as part of daily care.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide ongoing weekly Clinical Development Nurse reviews of skin-integrity risks, wound assessments, categorisation and care plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The Clinical Development Nurse now visits the Home on a weekly basis to review the approach to the management of risk to skin integrity and care and treatment plans in place where skin damage has been identified for any resident. She checks that wound assessment and categorisation is being completed correctly with review of wounds by staff in person supported by photographs. She attends the daily stand-up meeting during her visit to follow up on assessments and referrals and any clinical concerns. She is also available for advice and assistance to all staff outside these visits and can review concerns on an ‘as needed’ basis. She has reported an improvement overall in the approach of staff and their recognition of the importance of early interventions and comprehensive treatment plans.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and update residents’ assessments, risk assessments and care plans monthly through the Resident of the Day process.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “ii. All residents are part of the Resident of the Day process. As part of Resident of the Day process, all assessments, risk assessments and care plans are reviewed monthly and updated as required if needs change. This is completed by the Nurse leading the shift.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain electronic notifications and management oversight of clinical-status changes, wound categorisation, care planning and treatment regimes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “(iii) The General Manager at Windmill Manor Care Home has been provided with dedicated support from the Managing and Regional Directors and the Clinical Development Nurse during the recent period of change at the home. When changes to a resident’s clinical status are identified, including deterioration to skin integrity, these are added to the online systems which immediately notifies the Clinical”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare
    Page 4 · response
    Published 23 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct operational observations, monitoring visits and staff supervisions addressing equipment, moving and handling, and regular repositioning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The Regional Operational Trainer and Clinical Development Nurse have attended the Home on several occasions to carry out observations and monitoring and to identify any further areas for improvement for the clinical team. Visits took place on 7, 10, 15 and 22 October. On 15 October 2025 the Clinical Development Nurse attended the Home to review equipment used by staff to support resident care needs. A group session with staff was held to discuss availability of equipment, appropriate use and processes and procedures to assess need and request equipment including pressure relieving mattresses. During an observation visit on 22 October 2025 there was a focus on Moving and Handling techniques used by staff at the Home. No concerns”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train staff on dynamic-air-mattress settings, regular equipment checks and obtaining replacement mattresses outside hours.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Advice has been provided by the Regional Operational Trainer and Clinical Development Nurse in respect of the use of beds and mattresses as vital equipment for the management of skin integrity and as an aid to prevention of damage to skin. Full staff training has been carried out with the Head of Maintenance at the Home in respect of the use of dynamic air mattress settings and how to use these appropriately and the importance of regular checks. Refresher training has also been provided to the Home team in respect of how to access mattress replacements in the event of a mattress failure occurring out of hours.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct observations, staff supervisions and equipment-use support covering repositioning, moving and handling, mattresses and pressure-relieving equipment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The Regional Operational Trainer and Clinical Development Nurse have attended the Home on several occasions to carry out observations and monitoring and to identify any further areas for improvement for the clinical team. Visits took place on 7, 10, 15 and 22 October. On 15 October 2025 the Clinical Development Nurse attended the Home to review equipment used by staff to support resident care needs. A group session with staff was held to discuss availability of equipment, appropriate use and processes and procedures to assess need and request equipment including pressure relieving mattresses. During an observation visit on 22 October 2025 there was a focus on Moving and Handling techniques used by staff at the Home. No concerns”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train staff and maintenance personnel to set, check and replace dynamic air mattresses appropriately, including accessing out-of-hours replacements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Advice has been provided by the Regional Operational Trainer and Clinical Development Nurse in respect of the use of beds and mattresses as vital equipment for the management of skin integrity and as an aid to prevention of damage to skin. Full staff training has been carried out with the Head of Maintenance at the Home in respect of the use of dynamic air mattress settings and how to use these appropriately and the importance of regular checks. Refresher training has also been provided to the Home team in respect of how to access mattress replacements in the event of a mattress failure occurring out of hours.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement and embed the Enable electronic records and case-management system.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Introduction and embedding of electronic records and case management system ‘Enable’.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The registered provider is legally responsible for ensuring service users receive safe care and treatment, including pressure wound care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Barchester Healthcare Homes Limited have advised us the above actions are now in place at Windmill Manor. As a CQC registered provider Barchester Healthcare Homes Limited is legally responsible for ensuring that all service users receive safe care and treatment.”

    Source location

    2025-0637 - Response from Quality Care Commission
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 December 2025

    Open published response
  4. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Celia Marion PHILLIPS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Celia Marion PHILLIPS had a complex medical history and was bed bound, receiving care at home four times a day. She was admitted to hospital on 27 April 2025 with a probable chest infection, acute kidney injury and dehydration; a fractured ventriculo-peritoneal shunt had eroded through the skin and was protruding. She died on 1 May 2025 from multiple organ failure and sepsis of unknown origin, with the malfunctioning shunt contributing to her neurological decline and predisposing her to infection and dehydration. Concerns included a lack of evidence that she was repositioned or that carers had received training on pressure sores, skin assessment and repositioning, and she was found to have a deep tissue injury and a grade 1 pressure sore on admission.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of carer understanding of the need for repositioning to mitigate pressure sores

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The deceased was bed bound. 2. On the 12th March the deceased's GP documented that she had pressure sores and stressed the importance of frequent repositioning, noting that she had carers who attended four times a day. 3. In both written, oral and documentary evidence provided by the carers there was no indication that repositioning had been undertaken; that there was any understanding of the need for repositioning to mitigate against the development of pressure sores; or that there had been training on pressure scores, skin assessment or re-positioning. 4. Whilst not causative of or contributory to death when admitted to hospital on the 27th April 2025 it was noted that the deceased had a DTI and a grade 1 pressure sore. ”

    Source location

    Celia Marion PHILLIPS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of carer training on pressure sores, skin assessment or repositioning

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The deceased was bed bound. 2. On the 12th March the deceased's GP documented that she had pressure sores and stressed the importance of frequent repositioning, noting that she had carers who attended four times a day. 3. In both written, oral and documentary evidence provided by the carers there was no indication that repositioning had been undertaken; that there was any understanding of the need for repositioning to mitigate against the development of pressure sores; or that there had been training on pressure scores, skin assessment or re-positioning. 4. Whilst not causative of or contributory to death when admitted to hospital on the 27th April 2025 it was noted that the deceased had a DTI and a grade 1 pressure sore. ”

    Source location

    Celia Marion PHILLIPS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide further training in wound prevention.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “– Team managers will meet with all staff individually in their supervision and discuss the importance of detailed and accurate daily recording. – Staff will undergo refresher training on Record Keeping and Communication. – Staff will also undertake further training in Wound Prevention. – These trainings will be completed within a four-week (19th January 2026 – 15th February 2026) timeframe and then care coordinators will carry out competency spot checks on the staff members. – Management team will also look into working with digital recording provider (Access Group) and set up options of skin check / repositioning for clients where needed as a check in item on the daily recording element.”

    Source location

    Response from Inspire You Care Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct competency spot checks of staff after the training period.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “– Team managers will meet with all staff individually in their supervision and discuss the importance of detailed and accurate daily recording. – Staff will undergo refresher training on Record Keeping and Communication. – Staff will also undertake further training in Wound Prevention. – These trainings will be completed within a four-week (19th January 2026 – 15th February 2026) timeframe and then care coordinators will carry out competency spot checks on the staff members. – Management team will also look into working with digital recording provider (Access Group) and set up options of skin check / repositioning for clients where needed as a check in item on the daily recording element.”

    Source location

    Response from Inspire You Care Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Staff state that they understood the importance of repositioning bed-bound service users and had appropriate skills or training to support Celia.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “– Carers informed the management team that they were aware Celia was bed bound as they read her care plan. Carers said they had the appropriate skills/training to support her whilst she was in bed. This includes the importance of repositioning her at an appropriate interval when they attended their care calls. They also understood that if there were any concerns around Celia skin then this should be immediately informed to the district nurses. – When staff were asked that it was not reported in the daily logs that Celia was repositioned, staff admitted that this was their failing part due to poor record keeping and not mentioning this important information in the daily notes.”

    Source location

    Response from Inspire You Care Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 December 2025

    Open published response
  5. Gateshead and South Tyneside

    AI-generated summary

    Pauline Stirling · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Pauline Stirling, who had Alzheimer’s disease and Lewy Body Dementia, deteriorated with immobility, reduced nutritional intake and increased frailty before developing worsening pressure damage. She died on 7 March 2024 at Covent House Care Home in Gateshead; the inquest recorded chronic infection due to pressure damage on a background of natural disease. Concerns included inadequate wound monitoring and documentation, inconsistent positional changes and wound care, gaps in staff training, and ongoing record-keeping problems.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of positional-change documentation to record positional tilt relevant to pressure-damage prevention

    Wider context from the report

    “1. To date, the documentation for recording positional changes only requires care staff to input the position right, left, back, in chair with no reference to positional tilt to avoid pressure damage. ”

    Source location

    Pauline Stirling · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add a 30-degree hip-tilt option to Nourish positional-change records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As referenced during the Inquest, the Home transitioned to an electronic care recording system, Nourish, in May 2024. We acknowledge that this is a fairly new system, and that prior to the Inquest, there was no ability to input a positional tilt in the positional changes screen of Nourish. Immediately following the Inquest, we added a 30-degree tilt interaction, named a ‘hip tilt’, which is evidenced in our supporting documentation bundle (Exhibit 1).”

    Source location

    Response from Malhotra Group
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 October 2025

    Open published response
  6. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Edward John FUNNELL · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Edward John Funnell died on 29 April 2023 at Ystradgynlais Community Hospital after developing a worsening pressure ulcer and an ischaemic left leg during hospital care, for which he received palliative care. The principal concerns were that a podiatry referral was not followed up, nursing staff lacked knowledge about podiatric interventions for pressure wounds and circulatory problems, and recommended wound dressings were not followed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to follow Tissue Viability Nurse dressing recommendations

    Wider context from the report

    “c. There was an identifiable lack of knowledge on the importance of following the recommendations of the Tissue Viability Nurse in respect of the type of dressings to be administered and the importance of ensuring such steps were followed as opposed to using an alternative and, on the evidence, an inappropriate dressing. ”

    Source location

    Edward John FUNNELL · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of nursing staff knowledge about podiatry referral rationale and possible interventions

    Wider context from the report

    “b. There was an identifiable lack of knowledge on the part of the nursing staff to understand the reason for referral to a podiatrist and the possible interventions a podiatrist could undertake in respect of pressure wound damage, particularly in patients with circulatory problems. ”

    Source location

    Edward John FUNNELL · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide additional Tissue Viability Nurse training on assessment, escalation, dressing management, and access to appropriate dressings, with attendance monitored through quality meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Tissue Viability Specialist Nurse (TVN) to provide additional training to ward teams regarding the use and access to dressings.”

    Source location

    Response from Powys Teaching Health Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 8 September 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide ward-based and ward-leader education on the podiatrist’s role, scope, and service provision.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Lead podiatrist to attend all wards to ensure the teams are aware of the scope and breadth of the role of the podiatrist.”

    Source location

    Response from Powys Teaching Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 September 2025

    Open published response
  7. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Maureen POWELL · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Maureen Powell died from severe frailty after a prolonged period of ill health, hospitalisation and transfer to a nursing home. A serious pressure ulcer developed and worsened in the nursing home and contributed to her death. Concerns included inadequate recording and implementation of repositioning, failure to record skin inspections, delayed equipment and specialist referral, poor record-keeping, inaccurate reporting, and insufficient communication with her family.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Incorrect adjustment of airflow mattresses

    Wider context from the report

    “5. On at least one occasion the airflow mattress was incorrectly adjusted, reducing its efficacy; ”

    Source location

    Maureen POWELL · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clear guidance to staff when pressure damage is identified

    Wider context from the report

    “11. There was an apparent lack of clear guidance to staff as to what to do if or when pressure damage was identified. ”

    Source location

    Maureen POWELL · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Check airflow mattresses daily for correct type, function and resident-weight setting, recording checks electronically.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The mattress type to be supplied to a resident is determined following the consideration of a number of factors including an assessment of the resident’s weight, diet and fluid intake, mobility, skin integrity and capacity. Airflow mattresses are checked on a daily basis by the housekeeper to monitor that the correct mattress is in place, that it is functional and that it is set to the correct resident weight. These checks are again recorded on the care system to enable oversight of compliance against the procedure.”

    Source location

    Response from Red Oaks Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use a documented Skin Integrity Protocol covering pressure escalation, family updates and duty-of-candour requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Following further reflection at the Inquest, a documented Skin Integrity Protocol has now been introduced, formalising the instructions which the nursing team and carers have received through their respective training and providing a single point of reference for them when escalating pressure concerns. The Protocol encompasses guidance on the importance of ensuring that next of kin are kept informed of developments, the requirements of the duty of candour and guidance on the delivery of this, amongst other relevant matters.”

    Source location

    Response from Red Oaks Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The strengthened systems and procedures for monitoring residents’ care arrangements are considered appropriate in all the circumstances.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Accordingly, significant steps have been taken by the Home to strengthen the systems and procedures in place to monitor the correct implementation of care arrangements for residents, which are considered to be appropriate in all the circumstances.”

    Source location

    Response from Red Oaks Care Home
    Page 4 · response
    Published 19 June 2025

    Open published response
  8. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Iris Joan CARTER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Iris Joan CARTER had a fall at home on 1 October 2024 and sustained a left distal femur fracture, which was surgically stabilised. After rehabilitation treatment, including treatment for a Grade 4 pressure sore on her left heel, she developed pneumonia and died in hospital on 8 November 2024. The principal concern was that the pressure sore may not have been properly inspected or that inspections were not adequately recorded during her admission at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to properly inspect the skin of patients’ heels for pressure sores

    Wider context from the report

    “2. I heard evidence during the inquest that Iris was at heightened risk of developing pressure sores given her co-morbidities and reduced mobility post her operation and that a Grade 4 pressure sore is the most serious type of pressure sore where bone is exposed and can therefore be at risk of infection. 3. However, apart from one entry on 13th October 2024 in the QEH electronic in patient noting records when it was recorded that Iris was complaining of pain on palpation of her left heel and a pillow was placed under her heel, there is no reference in the noting to it having been observed at any point that Iris had developed a pressure sore to her left heel during her admission at the QEH. 4. This leads to a concern that either the skin to her left heel was not being properly inspected or if it was that such inspections were not adequately noted in the electronic in-patient noting. ”

    Source location

    Iris Joan CARTER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reviews found no pressure damage before 15 October, when a blister was identified, documented, escalated and assessed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our review of the documentation outlined in the medical noting documents there was no pressure damage noted on 09.10.24 at 14:18 by the Ortho geriatrician team, who noted review of the lower limb and noted oedema present to Mrs Carter’s leg.”

    Source location

    Response from UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS BIRMINGHAM NHS FOUNDATION TRUST
    Page 3 · response
    Published 24 April 2025

    Open published response
  9. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Katrina Veronica Francesca Insley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Katrina Insley died on 1 January 2024 at Alexandra Hospital, Redditch, from sepsis due to an infected pressure sore and pneumonia. The report identified concerns about the absence of a formal, documented handover system between hospital and the Neighbourhood Team, limited access to hospital records, and the resulting risk of delayed recognition and treatment of pressure sores, infection and sepsis.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide the Neighbourhood Team with direct access to hospital records for patients with pressure sores

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The absence of a formal, documented handover system between hospital and Neighbourhood Team and the fact that the NT cannot simply check hospital records of patients with pressure sores to verify their condition without specifically requesting records creates the potential for the NT to fail to appreciate the true condition of a patient’s pressure sores when they are discharged from hospital and follow up to be delayed. This increases the risk of wound infection and consequent sepsis. (2) I am informed (letter received from HWHT on 31.1.25) that there are established handover procedures and that a statement of practice is being drafted to “formalise” the referral requirements between hospital and NT. I am informed also that an App is being developed which can be used to record and check the condition of pressure sores and that it has the potential to be used across acute and community services. I do not consider that these proposals are sufficiently detailed, precise and concluded to address the concerns that I have expressed. ”

    Source location

    Katrina Veronica Francesca Insley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Obtain electronic patient-record access for two staff members per Neighbourhood Team, including evening and night community nursing teams.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trusts have further considered the impact of not having a shared records system, and the Health and Care Trust are in the process of obtaining access for 2 members of staff per Neighbourhood team (including Evening and Nights community nursing team) to the Acute Trusts Electronic Patient Record – ‘Sunrise’. The access will be given to staff who sit within Triage hubs in the Neighbourhood Teams and triage new referrals. This will enable them to gain detailed patient information, for example, regarding wounds.”

    Source location

    Response from Herefordshire and Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust and Worcestershire Acute Hospitals Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review access uptake after all identified staff receive access and determine whether additional electronic patient-record licences are required.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “So far, 18 out of the 26 people identified as needing access, have been granted access but are not yet in full operational use. Once all access has been obtained as planned, this will be reviewed quickly to establish whether more licenses are required.”

    Source location

    Response from Herefordshire and Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust and Worcestershire Acute Hospitals Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 February 2025

    Open published response
  10. Somerset

    AI-generated summary

    Cynthia Mary Gilbert · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Cynthia Mary Gilbert, who had cardiac and respiratory illness and reduced mobility, was admitted to hospital after being found unable to stand from the toilet. During her admission, pressure ulcers deteriorated and became infected, and she died from septicaemia on 20 December 2023. Concerns included repeated failures to follow her repositioning care plan despite her very high risk of pressure ulcers, and an unsatisfactory explanation for those failures in the Trust’s post-death investigation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to adhere to repositioning care plans for patients at very high risk of pressure ulcer development

    Wider context from the report

    “a) Mrs Gilbert was noted to have grade 2 tissue damage on admission to hospital. She was assessed as being at very high risk of pressure ulcer development. Her care plan included repositioning every 1 to 2 hours. The Intentional Rounding documents show that, during her time spent on the Old Acute Medical Unit and Coleridge Respiratory Unit (1/9/23 to 20/12/23), Mrs Gilbert remained in the same position in bed for periods of many hours on multiple days. b) Evidence given by the tissue viability nurse was that the tissue viability team emphasised the importance of repositioning on five separate occasions to the ward staff. The lack of adherence to the repositioning plan continued despite these communications. c) Mrs Gilbert’s grade 2 tissue damage deteriorated to a grade 4 pressure ulcer during her admission, leading to septicaemia. d) The lack of adherence to the repositioning care plan for a patient at very high risk of developing pressure ulcers raises a concern for future deaths. ”

    Source location

    Cynthia Mary Gilbert · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete the Intentional Rounding quality-improvement project and roll out the new tool and training package organisation-wide by June 2025.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to this, a Quality Improvement (QI) project was commenced in September 2024 with an aim to address these variances and improve the overall understanding, application and staff culture, leading to increased patient safety, a reduction in harm and ultimately better outcomes for patients. Since testing the specific role modelling approach for IR across 5 pilot wards, there has been an improved awareness and understanding from colleagues, a reduced number of reported incidences and / or concerns, with fewer patients suffering harm through the adverse effects of pressures leading to pressure damage. A new tool was developed which will capture more accurately the care delivery”

    Source location

    Response from Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain mandatory pressure-ulcer-prevention eLearning and associated aSSKINg-based education, including Waterlow assessment resources and eAssessment tools.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Introduction of a mandatory eLearning module for Pressure Ulcer Prevention – which notes the importance of repositioning patients and highlights immobility as a key risk factor for developing pressure ulcers. Most recent figures demonstrate 93% compliance with substantive staff mapped to the training.”

    Source location

    Response from Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use education, audits and further ward-based quality-improvement projects to improve pressure-ulcer prevention and management.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Education project 2023-24 – which saw 1251 education contacts, pre (1161) and post (481) knowledge questionnaires and audits that saw approximately 500 patient records reviewed within inpatient settings across the project. Further QI projects (with 6 ward areas with higher pressure ulcer rates) were commenced on the back of the results.”

    Source location

    Response from Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and align inpatient care-plan templates and documents using the aSSKINg framework.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Review and alignment of care plan templates/documents across the inpatient settings, which will incorporate the aSSKINg framework as a basis.”

    Source location

    Response from Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review lateral-turning devices, assess available options and risks, and develop a standard operating procedure to support equitable access and safe repositioning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• There is work, as a national safety alert (cot sides and bed accessories), to review the use of lateral turning devices (integral to mattress or separate support device to aid lateral turning/repositioning). This will include what devices are available to ensure equity of access, risk assessment tools for their use and developing a Standard Operational Procedure (SOP) document.”

    Source location

    Response from Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 4 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Have matrons work clinically on wards weekly to support training, identify high-risk patients, and lead ward rounds and safety huddles.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The ADPC is carrying out patient and relative engagement walk rounds across all of our wards, during visiting hours, this have been very positive and allows us to hear about areas of notable good practice and areas of concerns that need to be addressed. A plan has been put in place to carry out a 15 steps challenge on several wards across the trust. Night walk rounds are ongoing by the ADPC across both acute sites and have been well received by both staff and the wider MDT. The matrons are now working 20% clinical on our wards weekly supporting with training and education and supporting with the identification of our high-risk patients and are leading on ward rounds and safety huddles with the ward senior leadership team.”

    Source location

    Response from Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 4 February 2025

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026