Recurring concern

Inadequate management of pressure ulcers

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 20 Aug 2013•Latest report 12 Mar 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of controls specifically dedicated to pressure-ulcer prevention and management, including risk assessment, prevention measures, clinical assessment, treatment, monitoring, specialist referral, equipment, repositioning and escalation across community and inpatient care.

Not included

  • Excludes generic wound-care deficiencies where pressure ulcers are not materially identified.
  • Excludes generic staffing, training, documentation or communication failures unless they directly impair pressure-ulcer prevention or management.
  • Excludes management of wounds caused by other mechanisms, including impact injuries, unless the report explicitly connects them to pressure-ulcer care.
  • Excludes unrelated delays, discharge or treatment failures where pressure-ulcer management is not the shared unsafe condition.
Reports
51

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
106

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
135

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Care Quality Commission7
Department of Health and Social Care4
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board3
East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust2
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust2
Aneurin Bevan University LHB1
Angel Solutions (UK) Ltd1
Barchester Healthcare Limited1
Bargoed Care Home1
Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust1
Beech Dene Residential Care Home1
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust1
Brunswick Ward at Lindridge1
Bryntirion Surgery1
Care First Homes1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Maureen Edna Dick · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Maureen Edna Dick was admitted to hospital with likely sepsis and was at high risk of developing a pressure ulcer. A pressure ulcer developed and deteriorated, with concerns including inadequate risk assessment, repositioning, assessment and investigation, and failure to diagnose osteomyelitis before transfer. She died at Broomfield Hospital from her infected hospital-acquired pressure ulcer; the inquest concluded that her death was contributed to by neglect.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a system for mandatory pressure ulcer training

    Wider context from the report

    “4. There is no system for mandatory training for clinical staff in relation to pressure ulcers. ”

    Source location

    Maureen Edna Dick · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to adequately assess sacral pressure ulcers

    Wider context from the report

    “2. There was a failure by the medical staff to adequately assess the sacral pressure ulcer between the 24th October to 29th October 2021, particularly in light of the increasing white cell count and severe pain complained of by Mrs Dick. ”

    Source location

    Maureen Edna Dick · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Richard Thomas SHANNON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Richard Thomas Shannon was discharged from hospital on 5 January 2022 with an almost completely healed sacral pressure ulcer and was readmitted on 13 January with a severe, necrotic ulcer. The report states that inadequate monitoring of his skin integrity and failures in discharge planning and coordination among hospital, nursing, social care and care-provider services were substantive concerns. He died as a consequence of the severe pressure ulcer, with the medical cause of death including infected sacral pressure ulcer and coccyx osteomyelitis.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to consider documented pressure-ulcer risk when issuing care instructions

    Wider context from the report

    “5. The City of Westminster social worker considering the Discharge to Assess form did not consider any part of the form other than the specific instructions. She did not include in her thinking the record a little further down the same page that Professor Shannon had a grade 2 pressure ulcer and was at high risk of developing pressure ulcers. She told me that she was a social worker and not medically trained to read the Discharge to Assess form. However, she accepted that the form clearly stated that Professor Shannon had a grade 2 pressure ulcer and was at high risk of pressure ulcers. She said that she did not issue a specific instruction to Kapital to check skin integrity every day. ”

    Source location

    Richard Thomas SHANNON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to arrange pressure-relieving bed and mattress replacement before discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The discharge team at University College Hospital (UCH) did not seek a pressure relieving bed and mattress to replace Professor Shannon’s own before he was discharged on 5 January. This was because his sacral pressure ulcer was almost fully healed and so they did not consider it necessary. However, he was at risk of further pressure ulcers and so it was a measure that should have been sought. The changing of a bed is more difficult to organise once the patient is home and sleeping in it. If the Central London Community Healthcare district nursing team at Soho Centre for Health and Care (the district nurses) had been invited and had attended the UCH discharge planning meeting, it is much more likely that this measure would have been considered. ”

    Source location

    Richard Thomas SHANNON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update home-held care-plan templates with clear carer instructions, escalation criteria and community nurse contact details.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• We have updated the care plans template for care plans that are held in the patients’ home to ensure that they contain clear instructions for the carers where required. This documentation now also includes clear escalation criteria and contact details for the community nurses.”

    Source location

    Response from Central London Community Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Improve discharge information for carers, including holistic care instructions and equipment needed to reduce pressure damage.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust District Nursing Team has worked with University College Hospital NHS Trust and The City of Westminster to review and improve the quality of information we share with carers, prior to a vulnerable adult being discharged from hospital. This includes giving clear instructions regarding holistic care requirements and the equipment needed to reduce the risk of pressure damage.”

    Source location

    Response from Central London Community Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share discharge communications and care plans with all providers involved in patients’ care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• All communications including care plans are now being shared with all providers involved in care at discharge to ensure consistency in care provision.”

    Source location

    Response from Central London Community Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update home-held care-plan templates with clear carer instructions, escalation criteria and community-nurse contact details.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• We have updated the care plans template for care plans that are held in the patients’ home to ensure that they contain clear instructions for the carers where required. This documentation now also includes clear escalation criteria and contact details for the community nurses.”

    Source location

    Response from Central London Community Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and improve information shared with carers before vulnerable adults are discharged, including holistic-care instructions and pressure-damage prevention equipment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust District Nursing Team has worked with University College Hospital NHS Trust and The City of Westminster to review and improve the quality of information we share with carers, prior to a vulnerable adult being discharged from hospital. This includes giving clear instructions regarding holistic care requirements and the equipment needed to reduce the risk of pressure damage.”

    Source location

    Response from Central London Community Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Document tissue viability reviews in Epic’s discharge-planning section to communicate skin risks and equipment, dressing, and skin-check requirements before discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The Tissue Viability (TV) team at UCLH now document their reviews on the discharge planning section of the patient’s electronic health record system (Epic). This was previously completed under another section of the patient notes. This change ensures that the discharge team has a holistic view of the patient’s need, including skin concerns / risks and requests for equipment/dressings/skin checks, prior to discharge. This in turn ensures improved communication of risk, from UCLH discharge team to our community and social care partners.”

    Source location

    Response from University College London Hospitals
    Page 4 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train registered nurses to add discharge-relevant nursing notes to Epic discharge summaries; training is complete for senior ward nurses.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Registered nurses will be trained to add nursing notes (pertinent to discharge and continuity of care), on the discharge summaries on Epic . This has been completed for the senior staff nurses working in the ward (care of older people), where Professor Shannon was a patient. This training has been evaluated and will now be rolled out to specific wards across all hospital sites that link with community and social care partners. This will be review quarterly and reported quarterly through the Harm-free Care Committee and the Nursing and Midwifery Board (chaired by the Chief Nurse). The Trust Patient Safety Committee (PSC) will also be updated on a quarterly basis.”

    Source location

    Response from University College London Hospitals
    Page 4 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Contribute to developing the NCL tissue viability passport for consistent pressure-ulcer information at discharge and in community care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• North Central London (NCL) Integrated Care Board (ICB) has developed a NCL tissue viability passport which is designed to be a consistent tool for recording and communicating information about pressure ulcers at the point of discharge and within the community. UCLH discharge and tissue viability teams have contributed to the development of the tool. The tissue viability passport form will be used across NCL hospitals, when signed off by the NCL ICB senior management team. Once finalised, this form will be embedded into the UCLH’s Epic system for hospital use.”

    Source location

    Response from University College London Hospitals
    Page 4 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver pressure-ulcer training to therapists on causes, risk factors, and clear skin-care instructions in discharge-to-assess forms, completing Trust-wide training by June 2023.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Pressure ulcer training for therapists has commenced in the ward where Professor Shannon was a patient. This includes understanding of the causes and risk factors for pressure ulcers to ensure information/instructions in relation to skin care and risk is communicated clearly on the discharge to assess forms. Regular drop-in teaching sessions continue, as well as planned sessions to ensure all therapists in the trust have had this training by the end of June 2023. This training will be evaluated and reported via the Harm-free Care Committee and the Nursing and Midwifery Board (chaired by the Chief Nurse).”

    Source location

    Response from University College London Hospitals
    Page 5 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Communicate referral-screening requirements to staff so therapists and referrers complete skin and nursing sections before referrals reach community partners.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Following discussion with the Islington Transfer of Care Hub Clinical Screener, all referrals should be screened to ensure that the skin section and all nursing sections are completed by the therapist/referrer, prior to them being sent to the community partners. This is the expected process which will be further communicated to staff to ensure clinical information is highlighted and an appropriate care plan identified.”

    Source location

    Response from University College London Hospitals
    Page 5 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Contact district nurses whenever they are involved in an adult’s care to incorporate pressure-ulcer and other relevant needs into care plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Kapital Care coordinators will contact district nurses in all cases when it is identified they are involved in the adult’s care arrangements. This will ensure any care and support needs relating to pressure ulcer management and other relevant care needs can be implemented as part of our care plans.”

    Source location

    Response from Kapital Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review hospital discharge information and discharge letters to identify care needs relevant to care delivery.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• All relevant information including hospital discharge notes for the client is reviewed to ensure a better understanding of a person’s care needs.”

    Source location

    Response from Kapital Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Contact adult social care to request care-plan updates when additional needs are identified during initial visits or risk assessments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Kapital care will immediately contact adult social care to request any care plans are updated, whereby additional care needs are identified as part of the initial visit/risk assessment.”

    Source location

    Response from Kapital Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the Hospital Discharge Reablement Assessment Form with mandatory prompts for pressure care, manual handling and medication, and share it across agencies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The local authority has introduced a new Hospital Discharge Reablement Assessment Form. Implementation has begun and will be fully embedded by 6th February 2023. The new form includes prompts and mandatory fields in medical areas such as pressure care, manual handling, and medication. This information is transferred to the care plan sent to care agencies delivering social care. This tool is in operational use locally and is required to be shared across agencies.”

    Source location

    Response from City of Westminster
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update standard operating procedures with social-worker training, a discharge checklist, and escalation links with community providers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Standard operating procedures are being updated to reflect the outcomes of the workshops. This includes: ◦ a training package for newly qualified social workers entering the service and for experienced social workers as part of their yearly appraisal and continuous professional development. The training package focuses on identifying care needs associated with pressure care, manual handling and equipment, medication, risk management plans and the co-ordination role of a social worker. ◦ an improved tool for discharge including a template checklist to ensure all key areas are addressed. ◦ key escalation points and links with community providers including District Nurses.”

    Source location

    Response from City of Westminster
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Document tissue viability reviews in Epic’s discharge-planning section to capture skin risks and equipment, dressing and skin-check requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The Tissue Viability (TV) team at UCLH now document their reviews on the discharge planning section of the patient’s electronic health record system (Epic). This was previously completed under another section of the patient’s notes. This change ensures that the discharge team has a holistic view of the patient’s need, including skin concerns / risks and requests for equipment/dressings/skin checks, prior to discharge. This in turn ensures improved communication of risk, from UCLH discharge team to our community and social care partners.”

    Source location

    Response from University College London Hospital
    Page 4 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Contribute to development of the North Central London tissue viability passport for consistent pressure-ulcer information at discharge and in community care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• North Central London (NCL) Integrated Care Board (ICB) has developed a NCL tissue viability passport which is designed to be a consistent tool for recording and communicating information about pressure ulcers at the point of discharge and within the community. UCLH discharge and tissue viability teams have contributed to the development of the tool. The tissue viability passport form will be used across NCL hospitals, when signed off by the NCL ICB senior management team. Once finalised, this form will be embedded into the UCLH’s Epic system for hospital use.”

    Source location

    Response from University College London Hospital
    Page 4 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Communicate to staff the referral-screening process requiring completion of skin and nursing sections before referrals reach community partners.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Following discussion with the Islington Transfer of Care Hub Clinical Screener, all referrals should be screened to ensure that the skin section and all nursing sections are completed by the therapist/referrer, prior to them being sent to the community partners. This is the expected process which will further be communicated to staff to ensure clinical information is highlighted and an appropriate care plan identified.”

    Source location

    Response from University College London Hospital
    Page 5 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver pressure-ulcer training to therapists, including risk factors and clear communication of skin-care instructions on discharge-to-assess forms.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Pressure ulcer training for therapists has commenced in the ward where Professor Shannon was a patient. This includes understanding of the causes and risk factors for pressure ulcers to ensure information/instructions in relation to skin care and risk is communicated clearly on the discharge to assess forms. Regular drop-in teaching sessions continue, as well as planned sessions to ensure all therapists in the trust have had this training by the end of June 2023. This training will be evaluated and reported via the Harm-free Care Committee and the Nursing and Midwifery Board (chaired by the Chief Nurse).”

    Source location

    Response from University College London Hospital
    Page 5 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Contact district nurses whenever they are involved in an adult’s care arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Kapital care coordinators will contact district nurses in all cases when it is identified they are involved in the adult’s care arrangements. This will ensure any care and support needs relating to pressure ulcer management and other relevant care needs can be implemented as part of our care plans.”

    Source location

    Response from Kapital Care (UK) Limited
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Request relevant assessments, care information and emergency contact details from involved professionals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Kapital care requests all relevant assessments & information regarding the adult from relevant professionals involved in the care, including Physio, OT, DN’s and GP. This includes telephone numbers of who to contact in an emergency.”

    Source location

    Response from Kapital Care (UK) Limited
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review hospital discharge information and discharge letters to identify care-delivery needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• All relevant information including hospital discharge notes for the client is reviewed to ensure a better understanding of a person’s care needs.”

    Source location

    Response from Kapital Care (UK) Limited
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Contact adult social care to request care-plan updates when additional needs are identified.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Kapital care will immediately contact adult social care to request any care plans are updated, whereby additional care needs are identified as part of the initial visit/risk assessment.”

    Source location

    Response from Kapital Care (UK) Limited
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete manual-handling, mobility-equipment and environmental assessments before or during the initial visit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Kapital care will complete a robust manual handling assessment, including mobility equipment and environmental assessment are completed by the care coordinator prior/during the initial visit. This will ensure appropriate equipment, including items used to maintain the adults personal care is available within the property.”

    Source location

    Response from Kapital Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Escalate equipment-related barriers to essential personal care and resolve them before staff leave the property.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• All care staff will escalate their concerns to the care coordinator whilst at the adult’s home if they are unable to complete or deliver essential personal care tasks due to the lack of equipment in place. Kapital care will ensure the issue is resolved before the care staff leave the property and ensure the adults hygiene and dignity is always maintained. This action will prevent a reoccurrence of the identified concern.”

    Source location

    Response from Kapital Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use a discharge checklist to verify equipment, district nurse involvement and care-agency briefing before discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• To support an all-agency approach to discharge planning, social workers now use a checklist to ensure that all aspects of the care plan have been actioned prior to discharge, e.g., equipment delivery, district nurse involvement, care agency fully briefed. This is to minimise the risk of there being any gaps in the discharge process across all agencies.”

    Source location

    Response from City of Westminster
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete manual-handling, mobility-equipment and environmental assessments during initial visits.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Kapital care will complete a robust manual handling assessment, including mobility equipment and environmental assessment are completed by the care coordinator prior/during the initial visit. This will ensure appropriate equipment, including items used to maintain the adults personal care is available within the property.”

    Source location

    Response from Kapital Care (UK) Limited
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Escalate equipment-related barriers to care coordinators and resolve them before staff leave the property.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• All care staff will escalate their concerns to the care coordinator whilst at the adult’s home if they are unable to complete or deliver essential personal care tasks due to the lack of equipment in place. Kapital care will ensure the issue is resolved before the care staff leave the property and ensure the adults hygiene and dignity is always maintained. This action will prevent a reoccurrence of the identified concern.”

    Source location

    Response from Kapital Care (UK) Limited
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Improved local processes, staff education and monthly partnership reviews are considered sufficient to address discharge and post-discharge safety concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have reviewed and improved our local processes and education for staff to prevent further poor outcomes for patients. This is significantly strengthened by working collaboratively with our partners in the community and social care. We are confident this improved approach will enhance the quality and safety of the hospital discharge process and care outside of hospital. We are confident that we have addressed the concerns raised to ensure the care we provide to patients is safe and holistic. To assure ourselves and others, we have agreed to meet monthly as a newly formed partnership to review progress against these actions, share learning and collaborate on improvements.”

    Source location

    Response from University College London Hospitals
    Page 6 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response
  3. Sefton St Helens & Knowsley

    AI-generated summary

    Joan RICHARDSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Joan RICHARDSON, a frail 98-year-old woman living in supported accommodation, became increasingly unwell at home and was admitted to hospital on 4 May 2020. She had pneumonia, a fractured neck of femur and grade 4 sacral pressure wounds, and died in hospital on 18 May 2020. Concerns included failures to escalate her deterioration and pain, incomplete care planning and risk assessments, inadequate pressure-area care and documentation, and inadequate staff training and escalation procedures.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to document, assess and manage pressure sores or tissue injuries

    Wider context from the report

    “(brief summary of matters of concern) Joan had only started to receive care at home four times per day from lunch time of 29/04/2020, however when Joan failed to get up from her bed, refused food and fluids, complained of pain and generally started to deteriorate;- 1. The matter of Joan’s general deterioration was not escalated as it should have been to her GP/District Nurse/Commissioning Social Services etc. 2. When Joan complained of pain -the matter was not escalated as it should have been. 3. There was no comprehensive plan of care, risk assessment, pressure area care plan/risk assessment, falls assessment and care plan put in place following assessment by Litch care services. The manager/proprietor ████████ Registered manager informed the court they were still in the process of doing risk assessment/s etc because Joan was only receiving their care for 4.5 days before she was admitted to hospital. 4. Joan was admitted to hospital with Grade 4 pressure ulcers/tissue injuries to her sacrum, but because Joan had refused much of the personal care offered to her and she had remained largely immobile in bed the pressure sores/tissue injuries were not documented, assessed or managed as they should have been nor was the tissue viability nurse, GP, District nurse or social care team informed to enable them to commence/prescribe appropriate treatment. 5. There were no records/daily log making any mention of skin integrity/breakdown even though Joan was in bed, frail, immobile and incontinent in addition to which because Joan was refusing care her incontinence pad were not being changed regularly. 6. Training/education, support & supervision of care staff including the provision of clear escalation procedures was inadequate. Noting care staff attended upon Joan regularly as required. ”

    Source location

    Joan RICHARDSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Murray Hyslop · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Murray Hyslop developed Covid-19, reduced fluid intake and appetite, and became dehydrated, malnourished and affected by acute kidney injury. He was admitted to hospital on 24 December 2020 but did not recover and died from natural disease on 16 January 2021. Concerns included inadequate prevention of pressure damage, failure to identify when he needed medical attention, and a lack of openness about learning from adverse events.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide sufficiently responsive review of pressure-damage prevention needs

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Prevention of pressure damage – there was a lack of appreciation of the need to consider Mr Hyslop’s extreme vulnerability to pressure damage when he was very unwell, dehydrated, malnourished and largely immobile. Policies and practices supported only monthly review of his needs and that is insufficiently responsive in order to appropriately prevent damage from occurring; ”

    Source location

    Mr Murray Hyslop · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Cecilia EDWARDS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Cecilia Edwards was admitted to Whittington Hospital on 26 September 2020 with a severe right elbow infection and died there two weeks later. The report identified concerns that a category 3 pressure ulcer was not referred promptly to a tissue viability nurse, that many visiting nurses were agency staff without clear protocols, and that nursing visits were not routinely coordinated with carers, resulting in incomplete care on some occasions.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to make immediate tissue viability referrals for category 3 pressure ulcers

    Wider context from the report

    “1. On 12 February 2020, a district nurse assessed Ms Edwards’ elbow as a category 3 pressure ulcer, which should have prompted an immediate referral to the tissue viability nurse. However, no such referral was made, either by the attending nurse; the district nurses who visited twice a week over the next seven months; the frequent care plan reviewers; or the shift co-ordinator until 22 September 2020. ”

    Source location

    Cecilia EDWARDS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the referral process for Tissue Viability Nursing referrals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whittington Health has reviewed the process for referral to the Tissue Viability Nursing service (TVN) and is formally revising the ‘Referral to TVN guidance’ to ensure timely referrals are made based on clinical need and categorisation, and not purely based on categorisation alone. The new guidance will undertake regular audit practice to monitor compliance. The guidance will be formally ratified in August 2021, following consultation with staff.”

    Source location

    2021-0049-Response-from-Whittington-Hospital-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 February 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise and formally ratify Tissue Viability Nursing referral guidance, following staff consultation, with regular compliance audits.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whittington Health has reviewed the process for referral to the Tissue Viability Nursing service (TVN) and is formally revising the ‘Referral to TVN guidance’ to ensure timely referrals are made based on clinical need and categorisation, and not purely based on categorisation alone. The new guidance will undertake regular audit practice to monitor compliance. The guidance will be formally ratified in August 2021, following consultation with staff.”

    Source location

    2021-0049-Response-from-Whittington-Hospital-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 February 2021

    Open published response
  6. West Yorkshire Eastern

    AI-generated summary

    Mrs Ruby Baggaley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mrs Ruby Baggaley, aged 90, sustained a right distal femur fracture in a fall and died in hospital on the night of 24 January 2020 after complex surgery. Her blood pressure remained abnormally low after surgery, but escalation to senior clinicians was delayed until she was critically ill. Concerns included inadequate monitoring and failure to escalate her deteriorating condition, as well as uncertainty about whether clear escalation instructions and additional staff training had been implemented.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in providing a Nimbus Mattress

    Wider context from the report

    “6) Although it is accepted the following factors did not contribute to Mrs Baggaley’s death, they served to undermine the trust and confidence of her family in relation to the quality of care provided (particularly when contrasted with that at Leeds General Infirmary). • A delay in providing pain relief when she arrived at Chapel Allerton Hospital on the evening of 20 January 2020. • The delay in providing a Nimbus Mattress. • The delay in arranging traction at Chapel Allerton Hospital, despite this having been written in her Care Plan and being in place when she was in Leeds General Infirmary. The evidence given by a family member was that she was told no-one with the requisite skill was available at the hospital. • The cancellation of the surgery arranged for 23 January 2020 on the day it was to take place. This was lamentable not only for a frail 90 year old patient who was in pain, but was also a calamity for the efficient use of NHS resources: a theatre unused for a day; two surgeons each with a day wasted; an anaesthetist’s time wasted and one less patient treated overall. ”

    Source location

    Mrs Ruby Baggaley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Assess patients’ skin within four hours of transfer and order appropriate pressure-relieving equipment, including specialist mattresses when already required.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All patients will have a skin assessment within 4 hours of transfer and appropriate pressure relieving equipment will be ordered (this will be ordered at time of agreement to transfer if the patient is already requiring a specialist mattress).”

    Source location

    2021-0044-Response-from-St-Jamess-University-Hospital-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 February 2021

    Open published response
  7. Stoke-on-Trent and North Staffordshire

    AI-generated summary

    Mavis May Lawrence · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mavis May Lawrence, who had severe dementia and required full nursing care, was admitted to hospital with dehydration, deep ungradable pressure sores and a buttock abscess, and later died on 28 February 2019. The inquest concluded that she died from natural causes exacerbated by infected pressure sores. Concerns included gaps in pressure-area checks and care documentation, a pressure mattress being turned off, lack of escalation and pain-relief evidence, insufficient GP involvement, and district nurses not involving tissue viability nurses.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of district nurses to involve Tissue Viability Nurses

    Wider context from the report

    “(8) District nurses had not involved Tissue Viability Nurses. ”

    Source location

    Mavis May Lawrence · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to keep the pressure mattress switched on

    Wider context from the report

    “(4)The pressure mattress had been turned off on the 22.1.19 ”

    Source location

    Mavis May Lawrence · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to check pressure areas

    Wider context from the report

    “(1)Nursing notes evidence that pressure areas (sacrum/ buttock/hips) were not checked between 3.12.18 and 11.12.18. Wounds to the sacrum and left hip were documented on the 16.12.18 in nursing notes. ”

    Source location

    Mavis May Lawrence · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide additional wound-care documentation training and verify staff completion through training-register checks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “(1) Nursing notes evidence that pressure areas (sacrum/buttock/hips) were not checked between 3.12.18 and 11.12.18. Wounds to the sacrum and left hip were documented on the 16.12.18 in nursing notes. We have identified a number of actions aimed at improving completeness of our documentation; including the provision of additional training and a programme of audits, to ensure improvements are made. (Please see action plan below actions 1 & 2 & 4c).”

    Source location

    2020-0191-Response-from-Midlands-Partnership-NHS-Foundation-Trust.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 November 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit nursing documentation and pressure-ulcer management, using a developed audit tool and reporting findings to senior management.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “(1) Nursing notes evidence that pressure areas (sacrum/buttock/hips) were not checked between 3.12.18 and 11.12.18. Wounds to the sacrum and left hip were documented on the 16.12.18 in nursing notes. We have identified a number of actions aimed at improving completeness of our documentation; including the provision of additional training and a programme of audits, to ensure improvements are made. (Please see action plan below actions 1 & 2 & 4c).”

    Source location

    2020-0191-Response-from-Midlands-Partnership-NHS-Foundation-Trust.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 November 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    District nurses are skilled in wound management and refer to tissue viability specialists when wounds deteriorate, consistent with Trust policy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “(8) District nurses had not involved Tissue Viability Nurses. The district nurses and assistant practitioner band 4 assistant practitioners are skilled in managing wounds; including pressure ulcers.”

    Source location

    2020-0191-Response-from-Midlands-Partnership-NHS-Foundation-Trust.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 November 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The residential home is responsible for ensuring the pressure mattress is used appropriately.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “(4) The pressure mattress had been turned off on the 22.1.19 The Residential Home is responsible for ensuring appropriate use of the equipment. Our records show that during a routine visit on 22.1.19 the district nurse noticed that the pressure mattress had been turned off, and took immediate action and turned it back on.”

    Source location

    2020-0191-Response-from-Midlands-Partnership-NHS-Foundation-Trust.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 November 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Residential home carers are expected to conduct regular skin checks and contact district nurses when concerns arise.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “(5) No record of last visit by district nurses on the 27.1.19 When the patient is cared for in a residential home, the carers are expected to carry out regular skin checks as they are tending to the patient, on a regular basis. The process in place requires that the care staff raise concerns to the district nurses as and when required. There is evidence in the care records that MPFT staff did request the Residential Home staff contact MPFT district nursing staff if they had any concerns. There is evidence of a wound assessment table having been completed by the assistant practitioner (band 4 nurse from the district nursing team) on 27.1.19, in the My Care File when the assistant practitioner (band 4 nurse from the district nursing team) was requested by the Residential home care staff to complete an assessment.”

    Source location

    2020-0191-Response-from-Midlands-Partnership-NHS-Foundation-Trust.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 November 2020

    Open published response
  8. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Beryl Holland · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Beryl Holland sustained a fractured neck of femur after a fall at the care home where she resided, underwent surgery at Stepping Hill Hospital, continued to decline post-operatively, and died there on 7 July 2019. The concerns related to her prolonged stay in the Emergency Department while awaiting a ward bed, her vulnerability to pressure ulcers, and the absence of national guidance for managing pressure-ulcer risks in Emergency Department settings.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of national guidance on managing and reducing pressure-ulcer risks in Emergency Departments

    Wider context from the report

    “The inquest heard that Beryl Holland was in the Emergency Department of the Acute Hospital for a significant period of time before ultimately been transferred to a ward. This was due to awaiting a suitable bed. She was vulnerable and at high risk of developing pressure ulcers. The trust in question had identified gaps in its processes and taken steps to reduce the risk of pressure ulcers developing/worsening in the Emergency Department. The inquest was told that there is no national guidance relating to the management of/reducing the risks of pressure ulcers developing in an Emergency Department setting. As a result, Trusts will develop their own policies, which may not always recognise and react appropriately to the level of risk faced by those at risk of pressure ulcers particularly where there are prolonged periods of time in the Emergency Department. ”

    Source location

    Beryl Holland · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of Trust policies to recognise and respond appropriately to pressure-ulcer risk during prolonged Emergency Department stays

    Wider context from the report

    “The inquest heard that Beryl Holland was in the Emergency Department of the Acute Hospital for a significant period of time before ultimately been transferred to a ward. This was due to awaiting a suitable bed. She was vulnerable and at high risk of developing pressure ulcers. The trust in question had identified gaps in its processes and taken steps to reduce the risk of pressure ulcers developing/worsening in the Emergency Department. The inquest was told that there is no national guidance relating to the management of/reducing the risks of pressure ulcers developing in an Emergency Department setting. As a result, Trusts will develop their own policies, which may not always recognise and react appropriately to the level of risk faced by those at risk of pressure ulcers particularly where there are prolonged periods of time in the Emergency Department. ”

    Source location

    Beryl Holland · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing NICE guidance addresses pressure-ulcer risk assessment in emergency departments, so no further action is required at this time.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The NICE guideline on the prevention and management of pressure sores (CG179) specifically provides advice to clinicians regarding patients receiving care in emergency department settings.”

    Source location

    2020-0037-Response-from-NICE
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 February 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing NICE guidance, local NHS policies and the emergency department safety checklist provide relevant arrangements for preventing and managing pressure ulcers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am aware that the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has advised you in its response that a clinical guideline is available on the Prevention and Management of Pressure Sores (CG179)¹ and that this guideline provides specific recommendations to clinicians in relation to patients receiving care in emergency department settings if they have a risk factor. It is the view of NICE that this guideline provides relevant guidance.”

    Source location

    2020-0037-Response-from-the-Department-for-Health-and-Social-Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 February 2020

    Open published response
  9. Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin

    AI-generated summary

    Peter SUDLOW · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Peter SUDLOW developed a sacral pressure sore during a hospital admission following ischaemic myelopathy and paraplegia. The sore deteriorated, became infected, and he later died in a hospice on 8 April 2019. Concerns included failures to refer to the Tissue Viability Nurse at relevant stages and a lack of clear guidance on referrals, pressure sore prevention, and the relationship with Waterlow scores, particularly for patients with paraplegia or neurological deficits.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to refer patients to the Tissue Viability Nurse at indicated pressure-ulcer risk or severity points

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) During the period of time the deceased spent in hospital between 23/1/19 and 23/2/19 there was no referral to the Tissue Viability Nurse (TVN) at any time. (2) There was no referral to the TVN when the sore was categorised as a grade 2. (3) There was no referral to the TVN when the Waterlow score of the deceased increased to 17. (4) There was no referral to the TVN when the deceased was readmitted to hospital on 16/3/19 and the pressure sore determined to be Grade 4 until 22/3/19. (5) There was no clear guidance as to when and in what circumstances a referral to the TVN should be made. (6) The deceased presented with additional risks as determined by the Waterlow score with paraplegia and there was no clear guidance as to when a TVN referral should be made for those patients with additional risks such as paraplegia or neurological deficit for the purpose of seeking advice as to the prevention of pressure sores. (7) There was no clear guidance as to the involvement of the TVN in developing a plan to prevent pressure sores in those patients presenting with additional risks such as paraplegia or a neurological deficit. (8) There was no clear guidance as to the relationship between the determination of the Waterlow score and referral to the TVN to assist nursing staff. (9) The new Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Treatment 2 week booklet (PUPT) makes no reference to a TVN referral until a pressure ulcer has reached Category or Grade 3. ”

    Source location

    Peter SUDLOW · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of guidance on Tissue Viability Nurse referrals for patients with paraplegia or neurological deficit

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) During the period of time the deceased spent in hospital between 23/1/19 and 23/2/19 there was no referral to the Tissue Viability Nurse (TVN) at any time. (2) There was no referral to the TVN when the sore was categorised as a grade 2. (3) There was no referral to the TVN when the Waterlow score of the deceased increased to 17. (4) There was no referral to the TVN when the deceased was readmitted to hospital on 16/3/19 and the pressure sore determined to be Grade 4 until 22/3/19. (5) There was no clear guidance as to when and in what circumstances a referral to the TVN should be made. (6) The deceased presented with additional risks as determined by the Waterlow score with paraplegia and there was no clear guidance as to when a TVN referral should be made for those patients with additional risks such as paraplegia or neurological deficit for the purpose of seeking advice as to the prevention of pressure sores. (7) There was no clear guidance as to the involvement of the TVN in developing a plan to prevent pressure sores in those patients presenting with additional risks such as paraplegia or a neurological deficit. (8) There was no clear guidance as to the relationship between the determination of the Waterlow score and referral to the TVN to assist nursing staff. (9) The new Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Treatment 2 week booklet (PUPT) makes no reference to a TVN referral until a pressure ulcer has reached Category or Grade 3. ”

    Source location

    Peter SUDLOW · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clear guidance on when and in what circumstances to refer patients to the Tissue Viability Nurse

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) During the period of time the deceased spent in hospital between 23/1/19 and 23/2/19 there was no referral to the Tissue Viability Nurse (TVN) at any time. (2) There was no referral to the TVN when the sore was categorised as a grade 2. (3) There was no referral to the TVN when the Waterlow score of the deceased increased to 17. (4) There was no referral to the TVN when the deceased was readmitted to hospital on 16/3/19 and the pressure sore determined to be Grade 4 until 22/3/19. (5) There was no clear guidance as to when and in what circumstances a referral to the TVN should be made. (6) The deceased presented with additional risks as determined by the Waterlow score with paraplegia and there was no clear guidance as to when a TVN referral should be made for those patients with additional risks such as paraplegia or neurological deficit for the purpose of seeking advice as to the prevention of pressure sores. (7) There was no clear guidance as to the involvement of the TVN in developing a plan to prevent pressure sores in those patients presenting with additional risks such as paraplegia or a neurological deficit. (8) There was no clear guidance as to the relationship between the determination of the Waterlow score and referral to the TVN to assist nursing staff. (9) The new Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Treatment 2 week booklet (PUPT) makes no reference to a TVN referral until a pressure ulcer has reached Category or Grade 3. ”

    Source location

    Peter SUDLOW · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of guidance linking Waterlow score determination to Tissue Viability Nurse referral

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) During the period of time the deceased spent in hospital between 23/1/19 and 23/2/19 there was no referral to the Tissue Viability Nurse (TVN) at any time. (2) There was no referral to the TVN when the sore was categorised as a grade 2. (3) There was no referral to the TVN when the Waterlow score of the deceased increased to 17. (4) There was no referral to the TVN when the deceased was readmitted to hospital on 16/3/19 and the pressure sore determined to be Grade 4 until 22/3/19. (5) There was no clear guidance as to when and in what circumstances a referral to the TVN should be made. (6) The deceased presented with additional risks as determined by the Waterlow score with paraplegia and there was no clear guidance as to when a TVN referral should be made for those patients with additional risks such as paraplegia or neurological deficit for the purpose of seeking advice as to the prevention of pressure sores. (7) There was no clear guidance as to the involvement of the TVN in developing a plan to prevent pressure sores in those patients presenting with additional risks such as paraplegia or a neurological deficit. (8) There was no clear guidance as to the relationship between the determination of the Waterlow score and referral to the TVN to assist nursing staff. (9) The new Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Treatment 2 week booklet (PUPT) makes no reference to a TVN referral until a pressure ulcer has reached Category or Grade 3. ”

    Source location

    Peter SUDLOW · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of guidance on Tissue Viability Nurse involvement in pressure-sore prevention plans for patients with additional risks

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) During the period of time the deceased spent in hospital between 23/1/19 and 23/2/19 there was no referral to the Tissue Viability Nurse (TVN) at any time. (2) There was no referral to the TVN when the sore was categorised as a grade 2. (3) There was no referral to the TVN when the Waterlow score of the deceased increased to 17. (4) There was no referral to the TVN when the deceased was readmitted to hospital on 16/3/19 and the pressure sore determined to be Grade 4 until 22/3/19. (5) There was no clear guidance as to when and in what circumstances a referral to the TVN should be made. (6) The deceased presented with additional risks as determined by the Waterlow score with paraplegia and there was no clear guidance as to when a TVN referral should be made for those patients with additional risks such as paraplegia or neurological deficit for the purpose of seeking advice as to the prevention of pressure sores. (7) There was no clear guidance as to the involvement of the TVN in developing a plan to prevent pressure sores in those patients presenting with additional risks such as paraplegia or a neurological deficit. (8) There was no clear guidance as to the relationship between the determination of the Waterlow score and referral to the TVN to assist nursing staff. (9) The new Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Treatment 2 week booklet (PUPT) makes no reference to a TVN referral until a pressure ulcer has reached Category or Grade 3. ”

    Source location

    Peter SUDLOW · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of the Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Treatment booklet to reference Tissue Viability Nurse referral before Category or Grade 3 pressure ulcers

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) During the period of time the deceased spent in hospital between 23/1/19 and 23/2/19 there was no referral to the Tissue Viability Nurse (TVN) at any time. (2) There was no referral to the TVN when the sore was categorised as a grade 2. (3) There was no referral to the TVN when the Waterlow score of the deceased increased to 17. (4) There was no referral to the TVN when the deceased was readmitted to hospital on 16/3/19 and the pressure sore determined to be Grade 4 until 22/3/19. (5) There was no clear guidance as to when and in what circumstances a referral to the TVN should be made. (6) The deceased presented with additional risks as determined by the Waterlow score with paraplegia and there was no clear guidance as to when a TVN referral should be made for those patients with additional risks such as paraplegia or neurological deficit for the purpose of seeking advice as to the prevention of pressure sores. (7) There was no clear guidance as to the involvement of the TVN in developing a plan to prevent pressure sores in those patients presenting with additional risks such as paraplegia or a neurological deficit. (8) There was no clear guidance as to the relationship between the determination of the Waterlow score and referral to the TVN to assist nursing staff. (9) The new Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Treatment 2 week booklet (PUPT) makes no reference to a TVN referral until a pressure ulcer has reached Category or Grade 3. ”

    Source location

    Peter SUDLOW · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Arnold Fletcher Ward · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Arnold Fletcher Ward was a resident at Fernlea Nursing Home who developed a deteriorating grade 4 sacral pressure ulcer, later associated with osteomyelitis, and died in hospital on 21 January 2019 from a myocardial infarction. Concerns included inadequate monitoring and escalation of the pressure ulcer, failure to follow up a referral to the Tissue Viability Nursing Team, and the resulting lack of appropriate wound dressing.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of pressure-ulcer forms to capture deterioration and require detailed monitoring

    Wider context from the report

    “The inquest heard that within the home the forms used did not capture the deterioration of the pressure ulcer or require detailed monitoring/use of photographs to track its progress. This meant that the significant and steep deterioration was not recognised and escalated at an early opportunity to the Tissue Viability Nursing team for expert wound management input. As a result the type of wound dressing he required were not utilised/available. It had been captured in the notes that there had been a referral to the Tissue Viability Nursing team in October. There was no system in the home to chase up the team after a number of weeks had elapsed and there had been no response. The inquest heard that even in non-urgent cases the Tissue Viability Nursing team would contact a home requesting support in at least 10 days and more quickly in an urgent case. ”

    Source location

    Arnold Fletcher Ward · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Adopt the NHS wound-management document within the Quality Management System.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “After discussions with the NHS Tissue Viability Nurse (TVN) we have adopted the NHS wound management document within our Quality Management System to ensure continuity between ourselves and NHS professionals.”

    Source location

    2019-0433-Response-from-Fernlea-Care-Home-Redacted.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 31 December 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement an electronic care-planning system that uploads information and photographs in real time.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of our continual improvement strategy, the group has taken the decision to move forward with the implementation of an electronic care planning system that uploads information and photographs in real time. This will improve oversight and auditing and will further improve our wound management processes.”

    Source location

    2019-0433-Response-from-Fernlea-Care-Home-Redacted.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 31 December 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement electronic pressure-ulcer photography at identification and regular intervals to monitor deterioration.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Record Keeping Review in response to the issue that documentation in relation to the pressure ulcer failed to reflect the deterioration, and that photographs were not used to track the progress.”

    Source location

    2019-0433-Response-from-Stockport-NHS-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 December 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Adopt the Stockport pressure-ulcer monitoring form for consistent, regular monitoring.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am pleased to note that the nursing home has now adopted the Stockport NHS Foundation Trust pressure ulcer monitoring form to ensure consistent and regular monitoring of pressure ulcers.”

    Source location

    2019-0433-Response-from-Stockport-NHS-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 December 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete the extended comprehensive inspection of Fernlea Care Home, examining pressure-ulcer management and management oversight.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The matters of concerns which arose from the preventing future deaths report were reviewed by CQC and a decision was made to undertake an unannounced, focused inspection of the Fernlea Care Home. This was because the concerns indicated that the registered provider may have been/may still be in breach of the following fundamental standards:”

    Source location

    2019-0433-Response-from-the-Care-Quality-Commission-Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 December 2019

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026