Recurring concern

Failure to implement identified safety actions

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 17 Dec 2013•Latest report 24 Apr 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures to implement, complete or deliver actions arising from incident investigations, root-cause analyses, Trust action plans or other explicit safety action plans, including avoidable delays in completing their outstanding steps.

Not included

  • Excludes failures to create or sufficiently specify an action plan where no implementation failure is identified.
  • Excludes delays concerning ordinary clinical, infrastructure or administrative tasks that are not identified safety-plan actions.
  • Excludes generic organisational, staffing, training, audit or governance deficiencies unless they are explicitly presented as failures to implement identified safety actions.
Reports
45

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
48

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
80

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB9
Department of Health and Social Care3
British Transport Police2
Care Quality Commission2
Devon Partnership NHS Trust2
First MTR South Western Trains Limited2
NHS England2
North London NHS Foundation Trust2
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust2
United Lincolnshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust2
Woodhill Prison2
Avenue House Nursing and Care Home1
Axminster Medical Practice1
Barnet Assist1
Barts Health NHS Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Thomas Peter LOXTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Thomas Peter LOXTON was found unresponsive at home on 21 September 2023 and was subsequently declared deceased. The post-mortem examination determined that his death was due to an overdose of multiple prescription medications, and the inquest concluded suicide. Concerns included administrative errors that led to clinicians sending contact letters to his family after his death, insufficient collaborative working between two mental health trusts, and outstanding actions intended to reduce the risk of future deaths.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete BCH Root Cause Analysis recommendations within their target timeframes

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The evidence on behalf of Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (BCH) was that there are numerous recommendations as detailed in its Root Cause Analysis (RCA) report that remain outstanding that have target completion dates that arise after the conclusion of this inquest. These dates have been pushed back once already. I am concerned that if these targets are pushed back further and/or are not met, for whatever reason, there is a risk that future deaths will occur. Upon conclusion of the inquest, I am Functus Officio, with no power to request updates from the Trust to check and ensure that the targets have been met and changes have been made. Whilst I am grateful for the efforts of reassurance provided by representatives of the Trust at the inquest, I am reluctant to dismiss my concerns, particularly where actions remain outstanding, and I have opportunity to take action now to ensure that the risk of future deaths is reduced. ”

    Source location

    Thomas Peter LOXTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete the patient-death notification process action within its target timeframe

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Secondly, the evidence on behalf of DIH was that the above action to be taken remains outstanding and has a target completion date that arises after the conclusion of this inquest. I am concerned that if this target is pushed back and/or is not not met, for whatever reason, there is a risk that future deaths will occur. Upon conclusion of the inquest, I am Functus Officio, with no power to request updates from the Trust to check and ensure that the targets have been met and changes have been made. Whilst I am grateful for the efforts of reassurance provided by representatives of the Trust at the inquest, I am reluctant to dismiss my concerns, particularly where actions remain outstanding, and I have opportunity to take action now to ensure that the risk of future deaths is reduced. ”

    Source location

    Thomas Peter LOXTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue working with community services to embed action-plan changes and monitor their impact.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have enclosed alongside this letter a copy of the action plan presented to you during inquest on the 15th February 2024. This update provides further insight into the completion of all areas of learning identified as a result of our investigation. Where applicable we have referenced the assurance processes”

    Source location

    Response from Black Country Healthcare
    Page 1 · response
    Published 22 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Routinely contact BCH after an unexpected adult patient death to check whether BCH knew of the death and had patient involvement.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Building on the collaborative working arrangements we already have in place between DIH & BCH, with immediate effect, we have implemented a more enhanced process in both organisations to try to minimise any opportunities for delay and the impact this might have on families, as well as identified some broader actions to help develop further improvements:”

    Source location

    Response from Dudley Integrated Health and Care NHS Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 22 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Raise death-notification coordination with the Black Country ICB to explore improved management with primary care colleagues.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• In addition, we recognise that a patient’s GP will often be best placed to receive death notifications, reflective of their role as being at the heart of individual patient care. However, it is not always possible for each GP to be able to easily recognise all of the relevant organisations which would require being informed. Both DIH & BCH have therefore raised this issue with our local Black Country ICB to explore how we might be able to better manage this with our primary care colleagues. Within DIH, we have also engaged with our own GPs – we manage two GP practices in Dudley – to help identify any further opportunities for improvement.”

    Source location

    Response from Dudley Integrated Health and Care NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Engage DIH-managed GP practices to identify further opportunities to improve death-notification processes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• In addition, we recognise that a patient’s GP will often be best placed to receive death notifications, reflective of their role as being at the heart of individual patient care. However, it is not always possible for each GP to be able to easily recognise all of the relevant organisations which would require being informed. Both DIH & BCH have therefore raised this issue with our local Black Country ICB to explore how we might be able to better manage this with our primary care colleagues. Within DIH, we have also engaged with our own GPs – we manage two GP practices in Dudley – to help identify any further opportunities for improvement.”

    Source location

    Response from Dudley Integrated Health and Care NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Explore with relevant colleagues how full implementation of local medical examiner services could improve death-notification processes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• We have also identified that the full implementation of local medical examiner services also provides an excellent opportunity to improve the death notification process for all organisations and so are also exploring this with the relevant colleagues.”

    Source location

    Response from Dudley Integrated Health and Care NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ensure the immediate death-notification changes are reflected in DIH’s relevant procedural documents.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, we are both ensuring that these immediate changes are now being appropriately reflected in the relevant procedural documents within each organisation.”

    Source location

    Response from Dudley Integrated Health and Care NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the implemented changes at regular intervals to ensure they remain embedded.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I hope this provides you with assurance that the Trust has taken the concerns raised in your regulation 28 response very seriously and will continue to take action to reduce the likelihood of a similar incident from reoccurring. We hope that the actions highlighted above will make a difference and we will review changes made at regular intervals to ensure that they are embedded whilst sharing the outcome and lessons learnt with all affected staff.”

    Source location

    Response from Dudley Integrated Health and Care NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 22 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement an enhanced cross-organisation process for confirming patient deaths and preventing inappropriate post-death correspondence.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Building on the collaborative working arrangements we already have in place between Dudley Integrated Healthcare and Black Country Healthcare, we have implemented a more enhanced process across both organisations to try to minimise any opportunities for delay and to expand this might have on families, as well as identified some broader actions to help develop further improvements:”

    Source location

    Response from Black Country Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with the local ICB and primary care colleagues to explore improved management of death notifications.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, we recognise that a patient’s GP will often be best placed to receive death notifications, reflective of their role as being at the heart of individual patient care. However, it is not always possible for each GP to be able to easily recognise all of the relevant organisations which would require being informed. Both DIHC & BCH have therefore raised this issue with our local Black Country ICB to explore how we might be able to better manage this with our primary care colleagues.”

    Source location

    Response from Black Country Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Explore opportunities to improve death notification through full implementation of local medical examiner services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have also identified that the full implementation of local medical examiner services also provides an excellent opportunity to improve the death notification process for all organisations and so are also exploring this with the relevant colleagues.”

    Source location

    Response from Black Country Healthcare
    Page 3 · response
    Published 22 February 2024

    Open published response
  2. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Glenn Anthony LOCKWOOD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Glenn Anthony Lockwood, a known drug user receiving opiate replacement treatment, was found unresponsive after a suspected overdose on 14 April 2023 and later suffered a cardiac arrest. Despite hospital treatment, he died on 2 June 2023; the inquest concluded that his death was drug related, with mixed drug toxicity recorded as the medical cause. Concerns included whether Pregabalin abuse risks were sufficiently monitored and whether prescribing and record-keeping issues had been fully investigated and addressed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to take required actions following risk analysis

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Mr Lockwood’s drug treatment provider wrote to his GP in August 2021 to advise caution “with regard to other medicines with potential for abuse.” According to the British National Formulary, Pregabalin should be monitored for “signs of abuse”. The evidence I received did not reassure me that sufficient steps were taken to monitor for signs of Pregabalin abuse, particularly in a patient with known history of drug abuse. (2) The statement received from Mr Lockwood’s GP alluded to the fact that there were possible record keeping and prescribing issues surrounding Mr Lockwood’s prescriptions for Pregabalin. As a result, a Serious Event Analysis was conducted. In response to written queries from me, The Limehouse Practice responded by email on 14 November 2023. That email alluded to potential errors within the Serious Event Analysis and stated that the Serious Event Analysis would be re-opened and revisited. As such, I am not reassured that relevant risks have fully explored and/or any required action(s) taken. ”

    Source location

    Glenn Anthony LOCKWOOD · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  3. North West Wales

    AI-generated summary

    Lynsey Sarah Smalley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lynsey Sarah Smalley, aged 42, set fire to her bed at home during an acute psychotic episode on 8 April 2021. She suffered inhalation injuries, was admitted to intensive care, and died at Ysbyty Gwynedd, Bangor on 16 May 2021. The substantive concerns were conflicting investigation reports, disjointed patient-safety and governance processes, delays in completing actions, and risks arising from paper-based medical records that may impede continuity of care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in identifying and completing proposed actions

    Wider context from the report

    “a. The Health Board provided 3 investigation reports into the death, two of which contained conflicting evidence. One responded to Lynsey’s brother’s complaint. It is clear that there was no strategic plan or collaboration in governance processes. Furthermore, there were a number of proposed actions which took nearly two years to identify and complete. The time it took to identify and complete actions, together with governance processes are matters which I have raised previously with the Health Board in previous Prevention of future Death Reports. If there are such disjointed patient safety and governance processes learning will not be effective and deaths will continue to occur or will occur into the future. ”

    Source location

    Lynsey Sarah Smalley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise and co-design a new incident investigation and action-planning process, including governance review, staff training and planned implementation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Health Board is now fully reviewing the incident process to identify where it can be improved and strengthened. A workshop was held on the 23rd October 2023 to identify current issues and to begin the work of revising our process. The concerns you have identified in this notice, and in other notices, are being directly fed into this work. We are working in co-designing the process with staff and patient representatives, such as the independent Llais organisation, to implement a completely new and improved approach where the focus is on learning and improvement. During November 2023 we are meeting with the IHCs and Divisions for their collaboration and engagement in developing the process.”

    Source location

    Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 September 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor evidence supporting completion of investigation and complaint actions through the divisional governance forum.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “which is chaired by the deputy director of nursing, and any delays or breaches in timescales are highlighted. In June 2023, the Quality Governance team also began monitoring the receipt of evidence for completed actions via this forum. The Divisional PTR meeting reports to the Divisional SLT on a weekly basis and into the Divisional Quality Delivery Group on a monthly basis escalating any delays in the progress of reviews or actions. The expectation is that all complaints and incidents will be reviewed in line with the timescales set out by The National Health Service (Concerns, Complaints and Redress Arrangements) (Wales) Regulations 2011 and any delays are escalated each week to the Divisional SLT.”

    Source location

    Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 September 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold weekly coordination meetings between divisional nursing, governance and Healthcare Law leads to strengthen timely submission of reports and action evidence.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The MHLD Division has a close working relationship with the Healthcare Law Team who coordinate inquest activity for the Health Board. The Divisional Heads of Nursing meet each week with the Healthcare Law Team and the Head of Governance. This has further strengthened the timely submission of reports and evidence of completed actions.”

    Source location

    Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 September 2023

    Open published response
  4. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Christine Margaret Cumbers · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Christine Margaret Cumbers was admitted to hospital after developing a skin eruption following treatment with Carbimazole for hyperthyroidism. She developed sepsis during the admission, which was belatedly diagnosed and treated due to a lack of continuity of care caused by multiple ward moves, and this more than minimally contributed to her death. The GP practice also identified shortcomings in earlier care but had not implemented the learning from its review by the date of the inquest.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to implement learning from Significant Event Analysis

    Wider context from the report

    “The Practice, despite identifying shortcomings in their practice, took no action to implement the learnings identified in the Significant Event Analysis report and, as at the date of the inquest, no details of plans or timescales for implementation were available. ”

    Source location

    Christine Margaret Cumbers · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disseminate anonymised learning from the consultation concern at a practice meeting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As there was no identified systemic failure, the Practice addressed the concern identified in the SEA as described above (with the individual clinician involved) as well as disseminating learning at a practice meeting on 9/8/22 in an anonymous manner, to promote reporting. This said, the Practice also strives to go beyond what is common practice and this is the reason why we decided to audit consultations retrospectively to essentially promote reflection and improve patient care.”

    Source location

    Response from Ranworth Medical Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete a retrospective audit of consultations to promote clinician reflection and improve patient care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As there was no identified systemic failure, the Practice addressed the concern identified in the SEA as described above (with the individual clinician involved) as well as disseminating learning at a practice meeting on 9/8/22 in an anonymous manner, to promote reporting. This said, the Practice also strives to go beyond what is common practice and this is the reason why we decided to audit consultations retrospectively to essentially promote reflection and improve patient care.”

    Source location

    Response from Ranworth Medical Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit at least one consultation for every clinician annually against recognised criteria and send results for discussion with appraisers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We can confirm this was completed ahead of schedule on 31/7/23. As detailed in the SEA, it was agreed that every clinician would have at the very least one consultation audited against a known criteria (NHSE audit XL template) once a year and their result sent to them to be discussed with their appraiser. Appraisals are held yearly and are a means to help clinicians reflect on their practice to assure they continue to meet GMC standards. Hence this kind of sporadic monitoring (not mandated anywhere in the country) can never be a valid substitute nor give assurance on overall performance of a given clinician but is rather a quality improving exercise.”

    Source location

    Response from Ranworth Medical Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Risk-assessed signposting and safety-netting by trained non-clinical staff under clinician supervision is considered safe, so no further action is necessary.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is customary for the CCP to contact patients with failed visits within 24 hours. This happened in the case of Mrs Cumbers, as a doctor contacted her on two separate occasions on 25 March 2022. We note that Mrs Cumbers did contact the surgery on 24 March, a few hours after the failed pre-arranged visit. We consider that, whilst it would have been the gold standard for a health care professional (HCP) to be able to speak to Mrs Cumbers directly when she rang to explain why the doctor had failed to gain entry, it was entirely reasonable for Mrs Cumbers to be advised by a non-clinical member of staff at that time, following a clinician’s risk assessment. Such risk assessments are always HCP dependent and include factors such as: · reason for visit · living arrangements i.e. does the patient live alone · past medical history · carer support etc.”

    Source location

    Response from Ranworth Medical Group
    Page 1 · response
    Published 22 June 2023

    Open published response
  5. North West Wales

    AI-generated summary

    Eifion Wyn Huws · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Eifion Wyn Huws, aged 63, died by suicide at his daughter’s home on 10 June 2022 after being found suspended by a ligature. Concerns included the Emergency Department not having access to a very urgent mental-health referral held in hard-copy notes, and delays in completing and sharing the Health Board’s investigation and implementing resulting actions.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in acting on actions arising from death investigations

    Wider context from the report

    “2. An investigation was commenced by the Health Board into Eifion’s death which appears to have been concluded in July 2022 but did not appear to be finalised and ready for sharing / disseminating until March 2023. I have previously issued Prevention of Future Death Reports to the Health Board pertaining to the lack of timeliness of their investigations, specifically in relation to investigations from deaths in 2020 and 2021. Whilst I have previously been advised of improvements into investigation processes in respect of more recent deaths the issue of timeliness remain. Eifion died in 2022 and yet the time it took for the investigation to be completed and shared, with actions undertaken has been too long. I am concerned that deaths will occur when the actions arising are not acted upon in a timely manner. ”

    Source location

    Eifion Wyn Huws · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Prioritise overdue investigations and action plans, meeting weekly to resolve remaining work and monitor actions through completion.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In my previous letter to you on 09 May 2023, I was able to inform you of the changes that have taken place within the Health Board; these included a review of the incident process, and the quality control process delivered by the quality governance teams. The Health Board have also implemented rapid learning panels and incident learning panels. The MHLD Division have prioritised the completion of overdue investigations and action plans and there has been a significant reduction in the number overdue. The Division continues to meet weekly to address any remaining overdue investigation reports and to ensure that actions are monitored for completion. I recognise the importance of ensuring this improvement is maintained and I am assured that we have the mechanisms in place to monitor this and to take further action as required.”

    Source location

    Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Local Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response
  6. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Carl Garry Thompson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Carl Garry Thompson died from a drug overdose while on leave from Arden Ward, Stepping Hill Hospital, and was likely to have died on the night of 9 March 2022. Concerns included inadequate risk assessments and planning for his leave, insufficient response and escalation after family concerns about increased risk, and failure to provide a face-to-face Community Mental Health Team assessment or allocate a care coordinator before leave.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete identified action plan actions

    Wider context from the report

    “9. ████████ gave evidence that although the Trust Review had identified a number of missed opportunities, the Trust Action plan, which contained 6 Action points was still “In progress”. ████████ was not able to identify a single action point that had been completed to date. ”

    Source location

    Carl Garry Thompson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revisit local support for investigation authors and services to promote active review of action plans and prepare authors to evidence improvements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “IR authors required to give evidence will be supported and be prepared to give evidence against the action plan demonstrating improvements in service. To this end, local support has been revisited for Investigation authors, to support active review of action plans with the Investigation author and the services involved.”

    Source location

    Response from Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 17 May 2023

    Open published response
  7. North Wales (East and Central)

    AI-generated summary

    Nancy Carolyn Price · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Nancy Carolyn Price, aged 62, presented with sudden loss of movement and sensation in both lower limbs and was diagnosed with limb ischaemia. There were delays in assessing and transferring her for vascular surgery, after which she developed multi-organ failure and died on 1 January 2021. The principal concerns were the delayed Health Board investigation, delayed sharing of learning, and unrealistic or incomplete action plans, which limited the timely identification of learning and training needs.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete investigation actions within their required timescales

    Wider context from the report

    “An investigation was commenced by the Health Board into the death of Nancy Carolyn Price, a significant time after her death and was completed only on 9 June 2022, some 17 months after her death. At inquest it was identified that not all actions arising have been fully completed and the dates by when actions ought to have been completed (according to the investigation report) not adhered to. For example, the investigation report was due to be shared with vascular services to share learning by June 2022 (once approved) and yet the Report was only shared with vascular services in January 2023. The actions arising from the investigation report are not always realistic. For example, one action was to identify any gaps in knowledge with regards to assessment and management of vascular emergencies, including recording of limb colour, sensation and movement, by the end of June 2022, approximately 3-4 weeks after the final report. I have previously issued Prevention of Future Death Reports to the Health Board pertaining to the lack of timeliness of their investigations. I remain significantly concerned that the strategic management of internal Health Board investigations is lacking leading to investigations that are too slow, actions are not always realistic and, as a result, identification of areas for learning and training are not understood quickly enough, such that deaths will occur or will continue to occur into the future unless rapid action is taken. ”

    Source location

    Nancy Carolyn Price · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide local quality governance support to services for managing open and overdue investigations and evidencing completed actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Our divisionally-based Quality Governance Teams will support our services locally with understanding their open and overdue investigations and actions, and will support services to collate evidence of action completion. The Patient Safety Team have the role of monitoring performance and assuring the completion of actions.”

    Source location

    Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Local Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 May 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor performance and assure completion of investigation actions through the Patient Safety Team.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Our divisionally-based Quality Governance Teams will support our services locally with understanding their open and overdue investigations and actions, and will support services to collate evidence of action completion. The Patient Safety Team have the role of monitoring performance and assuring the completion of actions.”

    Source location

    Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Local Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 May 2023

    Open published response
  8. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Thomas Jayamaha · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Thomas Jayamaha died by suicide after taking Pentobarbital ordered from a website abroad. He had Autism Spectrum Disorder, longstanding mental health difficulties, suicidal ideation and previous self-harm or suicide attempts, alongside other reported vulnerabilities. The principal concerns were delayed progress on the Trust’s Autism Strategy, insufficient progress with complex case management, and the Serious Incident Investigation process.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to have necessary actions in place to address issues identified through the Serious Incident Investigation process

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The Serious Incident Investigation process I am not reassured that necessary actions to address these serious issues identified are in place. ”

    Source location

    Thomas Jayamaha · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Commission and deliver Serious Incident Quality Assurance training to strengthen critical appraisal of investigation reports and SMART, systems-based actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Quality Assurance of Investigation Reports: We also recognised that we needed to strengthen our overall review of our investigation reports and ensure those individuals who are approving/authorising the final report have the skills to critically appraise the report and ensure it is fit for purpose.”

    Source location

    Response from Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 6 · response
    Published 14 April 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and implement quality improvement plans based on discussion of investigation recommendations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Recommendations are also discussed and based on this, quality improvement plans are developed and implemented.”

    Source location

    Response from Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 6 · response
    Published 14 April 2023

    Open published response
  9. North Wales (East and Central)

    AI-generated summary

    Ben Christopher Harrison · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ben Christopher Harrison, aged 37, was found in cardiac arrest with a ligature around his neck while a voluntary inpatient and died three days later after being transferred to intensive care. During resuscitation, an oxygen cylinder valve was not opened, so he was ventilated only on room air. Concerns included delays in addressing investigation learning and actions, and an evident lack of overall strategic direction to investigations and learning.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in addressing learning and actions arising from investigations

    Wider context from the report

    “The Health Board undertook an investigation following Ben’s death. The investigation contains an Action Plan arising as a result of the learning. It has taken the Health Board a considerable amount of time to update and provide the Action Plan, the most recent version still containing outstanding actions and yet Ben died over 2 years ago. It is particularly concerning that learning and actions arising therefrom are not more quickly addressed. If the learning, actions and changes are taking so long then there is a risk that deaths will continue in the interim. Overall, there is an evident lack of overall strategic direction to investigations and learning. ”

    Source location

    Ben Christopher Harrison · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    John Abrahams (Jack) · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jack Abrahams was 20 years old when he took his own life by self-ligature. He had previously received a six-month course of isotretinoin for acne, but the available evidence did not meet the required standard to show a causative link between the treatment and his suicide. The principal concern was that, more than a year after the Isotretinoin Expert Working Group completed its report, its recommendations had still not been implemented, and a further working group to consider implementation had yet to meet.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to implement Isotretinoin prescribing recommendations

    Wider context from the report

    “The Commission for Human Medicine (CHM) established an Isotretinoin Expert Working Group (IEWG) in response to concerns about psychiatric events. The IEWG considered oral and written evidence over 2020 and 2021. The findings and recommendations of the IEWG were presented in a report to the CHM at the end of 2021 and include a recommendation which relates to prescribing for patients under the age of 18. It is now over a year since the IEWG report was completed and the recommendations have still not been implemented. In that time there have been 45 adverse Isotretinoin events reported to the Medicines Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) comprising of 81 psychiatric adverse events, one of which was an attempted suicide. The Court heard that a second working group is required to consider how to implement the IEWG recommendations and that this group has yet to meet. ”

    Source location

    John Abrahams (Jack) · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue the Implementation Working Group’s work to develop the practical arrangements for safely introducing the isotretinoin recommendations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The CHM further advised in August 2022 that, in order to ensure the safe and effective introduction of the recommendations, an Implementation Working Group should be established with representation from the wider healthcare system in addition to relevant”

    Source location

    Response from Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency 1
    Page 1 · response
    Published 24 February 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish and convene an Implementation Working Group to develop the practical implementation of isotretinoin safety recommendations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The CHM further advised that, in order to ensure the safe and effective introduction of the recommendations, an Implementation Working Group should be established with representation from the wider healthcare system in addition to relevant healthcare professionals. This was due to concerns raised around the logistical implementation of the recommendations which may delay treatment for those that need it.”

    Source location

    Response from Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 February 2023

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026