Recurring concern
Inadequate control and visibility of hazardous kerb edges
- Reports that mention this concern
- 4
- Times this concern has been raised
- 4
- Stated actions linked to this concern
- 2
What this concern includes
Includes physical defects, unclear transitions and inadequate visibility or warning measures at kerb edges where the condition can affect road users, including cyclists, pedestrians or approaching motorists.
What is not included
- Excludes general road-design, road-surface, junction, signage or visibility deficiencies where a hazardous kerb edge is not the material unsafe condition.
- Excludes ordinary kerb maintenance or accessibility issues without a supported road-user safety consequence.
- Excludes generic pedestrian, cyclist or vehicle-control concerns that do not identify a deficient or hazardous kerb edge.
- Excludes hazards at platform, building or other non-road edges unless the assertion concerns the same road-user kerb-edge safety condition.
Trends
Reports over time
Reports mentioning this concern, over time
Reports about this concern issued each year.
* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.
Most frequent recipients
Most frequent recipients
Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.
Reports and published responses 4 reports
See individual reports that have raised this concern, and the actions taken in response
-
Concerns raised1
Failure to prevent vehicles from entering the canal at the end of the road
Linked response
- West Sussex County Council
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.1
-
West Sussex County Council
Install reflective bollards along the canal bank to provide a clearer visual indication of the road end.
Respondent positions A position is what a respondent says about the concern when they do not describe a specific action.1
-
West Sussex County Council
Existing kerb height provides sufficient physical and audible warning; raising it is not considered necessary and would cause visual intrusion.
-
Concerns raised1
Inadequate measures highlighting the commencement of the kerb to oncoming motorists
This report raised 1 other concern. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked response
- Kirklees Borough Council
Respondent positions A position is what a respondent says about the concern when they do not describe a specific action.1
-
Kirklees Borough Council
Existing edge and centre-line markings comply with applicable requirements and direct drivers away from the kerb transition.
-
Concerns raised1
Dip in the kerb edge
This report raised 2 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked response
- Mike Suarez
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.1
-
Mike Suarez
Re-kerb the affected length to provide a consistently higher kerb edge.
-
Concerns raised1
Use of chamfered kerb stones on the carriageway
This report raised 1 other concern. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked response
- Stockport Borough Council
Respondent positions A position is what a respondent says about the concern when they do not describe a specific action.1
-
Stockport Borough Council
The existing splayed kerb is appropriate for a dual carriageway because it allows vehicles to leave the carriageway during emergencies.
Actions and positions describe what organisations say in published responses. Implementation is not independently verified.
Data last updated 7 September 2026