Recurring concern

Unreliable post-fall assessment and clinical response

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 3 Dec 2013•Latest report 30 Mar 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of controls specifically dedicated to post-fall care, including immediate assessment, medication review, neurological observations, clinical direction, medical review, injury escalation, monitoring and handover following a patient fall.

Not included

  • Excludes pre-fall falls-risk assessment and prevention measures unless the report also identifies a post-fall assessment or response failure.
  • Excludes generic clinical review, escalation or documentation deficiencies not specifically connected to care after a patient fall.
  • Excludes delays in ambulance attendance or hospital admission where no post-fall clinical assessment or response deficiency is identified.
  • Excludes unrelated medication-review failures outside the post-fall care process.
Reports
44

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
57

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
76

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Care Quality Commission4
Barts Health NHS Trust2
Royal London Hospital2
Whittington Health NHS Trust2
Alexandra Rose Residential Care Home1
Barchester Healthcare Limited1
Blenheim House1
Bourne House, Old Sarum1
Bupa Care Homes1
Bupa UK Provision1
Care4u Health Care Limited1
Care First Class (UK) Limited1
Charing Healthcare Ltd1
City of Doncaster Council1
County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Berkshire

    AI-generated summary

    John Albert TARRANT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Albert Tarrant, aged 84, died at Wexham Park Hospital after an unwitnessed fall while an inpatient on 29 April 2025, sustaining a brain bleed that later became unsurvivable. The principal concerns were inaccurate falls risk assessments and insufficient awareness or prompting regarding the urgency of anticoagulation reversal after a fall.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of the post-falls proforma to prompt consideration of anticoagulation reversal and urgency

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Anti coagulation risk awareness The doctor who reviewed the CT results and neurosurgery advice after Mr Tarrant fell did not appreciate the urgency of the situation. I found in this inquest that due to timing issues this was not likely to have affected the outcome for Mr Tarrant. I heard from the consultant witness that the risks of anticoagulation are poorly understood. The post falls proforma was reviewed in court and, whilst it asked whether the patient was on anticoagulation medication, it did not provide a prompt about this during the post fall medical planning section. This led to a concern that the importance of considering and administering an anticoagulation reversal medication and the urgency of such a need may be underappreciated. ”

    Source location

    John Albert TARRANT · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Urmila Patel · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Urmila Patel, aged 78, was admitted to hospital with suspected sepsis and later fell in a ward toilet on 29 June 2025. She subsequently deteriorated and died in hospital on 7 July 2025 after a CT scan identified a significant subdural haematoma. The concerns included inadequate falls-risk assessment, mobility care planning, supervision, assessment for intracranial bleeding, timely CT referral, and review of her warfarin after the fall.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to reassess falls risk after a fall

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The failure of nurses on the ward to instigate an adequate falls risk assessment of Mrs Patel. 2. The failure of nursing staff on the ward to produce a meaningful care-plan for Mrs Patel’s mobility. 3. The failure of Trust staff to note a fall on 23rd June 2025 and reassess risk of falls. 4. The failure of nursing staff on the ward to monitor and supervise Mrs Patel on the afternoon of 29th June 2025. 5. The failure of Trust staff to adequately assess the likelihood of a traumatic intra-cranial bleed following the fall on 29th June 2025. 6. The failure of the duty doctor to act decisively and refer Mrs Patel for an urgent CT Head scan on 29th June 2025. 7. The failure of the duty doctor to review Mrs Patel’s warfarin prescription after the fall. 8. The failure of ward staff on the ward round on 30th June 2025 to read the clinical records from the previous day to alert them to Mrs Patel’s fall on 29th June 2025. ”

    Source location

    Urmila Patel · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to review warfarin prescriptions after a fall

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The failure of nurses on the ward to instigate an adequate falls risk assessment of Mrs Patel. 2. The failure of nursing staff on the ward to produce a meaningful care-plan for Mrs Patel’s mobility. 3. The failure of Trust staff to note a fall on 23rd June 2025 and reassess risk of falls. 4. The failure of nursing staff on the ward to monitor and supervise Mrs Patel on the afternoon of 29th June 2025. 5. The failure of Trust staff to adequately assess the likelihood of a traumatic intra-cranial bleed following the fall on 29th June 2025. 6. The failure of the duty doctor to act decisively and refer Mrs Patel for an urgent CT Head scan on 29th June 2025. 7. The failure of the duty doctor to review Mrs Patel’s warfarin prescription after the fall. 8. The failure of ward staff on the ward round on 30th June 2025 to read the clinical records from the previous day to alert them to Mrs Patel’s fall on 29th June 2025. ”

    Source location

    Urmila Patel · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a multidisciplinary falls quality-improvement programme covering footwear, medication review and post-fall multidisciplinary review.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Falls prevention has also been strengthened through a multidisciplinary quality improvement programme, recognising the contribution of nursing, medical, therapy, and pharmacy teams. This includes initiatives focused on appropriate footwear, structured medication review (including medicines associated with increased falls risk), and consistent post-fall multidisciplinary review. To support assurance, a ward-level falls audit programme commenced on 2 February 2026, with the most recent audit completed on 14 April 2026. Early findings demonstrate high compliance with falls risk assessment (97.2%), improved initiation of falls care plans (83.3%), improved completion of lying and standing blood pressure (78%), and timely medical review following falls. These findings are reviewed through ward and divisional governance processes to support sustained improvement.”

    Source location

    Response from Barts Health NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce a mandatory post-fall care bundle and checklist requiring structured assessment, neurological observations, escalation triggers and clinical documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A mandatory post-fall care bundle and checklist has been introduced for all inpatient falls. This ensures that each fall is managed as a clinical event requiring structured assessment and response, aligned to the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework.”

    Source location

    Response from Barts Health NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce an out-of-hours falls review protocol requiring the Duty Matron or Site Manager to review inpatient falls within two hours.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Senior oversight has been enhanced through the introduction of an out-of-hours falls review protocol, requiring the Duty Matron or Site Manager to review all inpatient falls within two hours, providing assurance that appropriate actions and escalation have occurred.”

    Source location

    Response from Barts Health NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit post-fall neurological observations through divisional governance and provide multidisciplinary simulation training on recognition, escalation and immediate management.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Monitoring reliability has been strengthened through regular audit of post-fall neurological observations, with findings reviewed through divisional governance structures. In addition, multidisciplinary simulation training has been introduced, using scenarios such as anticoagulated patients and neurological deterioration, to reinforce recognition of risk, escalation, and immediate management.”

    Source location

    Response from Barts Health NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a mandatory post-inpatient-fall medical review bundle and standardised proforma covering neurological assessment, imaging, anticoagulation, medication review and senior escalation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A mandatory post-inpatient fall medical review care bundle has been implemented, supported by a standardised proforma. This provides a structured framework for clinical assessment and decision-making following a fall.”

    Source location

    Response from Barts Health NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share case learning through medical and nursing governance forums and reinforce it through simulation training on deterioration, imaging and anticoagulation safety.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Learning from this case has been shared through medical and nursing governance forums and reinforced through simulation-based training focusing on deterioration, imaging decisions, and anticoagulation safety.”

    Source location

    Response from Barts Health NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NHS England, which oversees the issues raised, is responsible for responding directly to the Prevention of Future Deaths report.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Given the concerns you have raised I feel it is important that you receive a response directly from NHS England as it has oversight for the issues you raise. Therefore, my officials have contacted NHS England who have agreed to respond to you directly about the Prevention of Future Death report concerning Mrs Patel.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 March 2026

    Open published response
  3. South Yorkshire (Eastern)

    AI-generated summary

    Dennis Keith Price · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Dennis Keith Price, a 71-year-old man, died on 28 October 2024 after falling while making his way unescorted to the toilet during a hospital admission. He suffered a subdural haemorrhage after the fall, and concerns included incomplete post-fall review, unclear neurological-observation instructions, and delays or failures in responding to Nerve Centre alerts.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clear direction from the attending doctor following a fall

    Wider context from the report

    “2. No clear plan for frequency of neurological observations and duration of the same and associated lack of clear direction from the attending Doctor following a fall. ”

    Source location

    Dennis Keith Price · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a clear plan for the frequency and duration of neurological observations following a fall

    Wider context from the report

    “2. No clear plan for frequency of neurological observations and duration of the same and associated lack of clear direction from the attending Doctor following a fall. ”

    Source location

    Dennis Keith Price · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete inpatient post-fall reviews

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Failure to properly complete the inpatient post fall review. ”

    Source location

    Dennis Keith Price · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Embed requirements for attending doctors to document individualised post-fall neurological observation plans covering frequency, duration, review and escalation criteria.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust acknowledges the concern regarding the absence of consistently documented medical direction for the frequency and duration of neurological observations following Mr Price’s fall. While the Patient Falls Prevention and Management Policy (PAT/PS 11) provides guidance on post-fall management, learning has identified the need for clearer, explicit documentation by the attending doctor to ensure that neurological observation requirements, review arrangements and escalation plans are clearly defined and understood by the multidisciplinary team. As part of ongoing improvement, the Trust is reinforcing the expectation that a clear, individualised post-fall monitoring plan is documented following every fall, supported through strengthened documentation standards, targeted multidisciplinary training and continued emphasis on completion of the Inpatient Post-Fall Review.”

    Source location

    2026-0037 - Response from Doncaster Royal Infirmary
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver and reinforce multidisciplinary training on complete, contemporaneous clinical documentation, including post-fall records and neurological observations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust recognises that training is fundamental in reinforcing the importance of complete, accurate and contemporaneous clinical documentation, and this remains a core component of all education delivered by the Patient Safety Team. In addition, targeted documentation training has been delivered by the Trust’s Solicitor/Legal Manager to Foundation Year 1 doctors on 11 September 2025, and to Preceptorship Nurses on 11 and 25 November 2025. This programme of education forms part of an ongoing initiative, with further lectures and seminars planned to ensure continued reinforcement of documentation standards across the organisation.”

    Source location

    2026-0037 - Response from Doncaster Royal Infirmary
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 January 2026

    Open published response
  4. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Stephen LAWRENCE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Stephen Lawrence, a resident at Eastcroft Nursing Home, sustained an unwitnessed fall on 21 December 2022 and multiple rib fractures, which led to a haemopneumothorax and pneumonia. He died in hospital on 5 January 2023; concerns included unexplained injuries, deficient nursing home records, delayed medical advice, and conflicting evidence from the nursing home manager, with an ongoing risk to current residents.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in seeking medical advice following unwitnessed falls

    Wider context from the report

    “- Mr Lawrence sustained significant unexplained injuries whilst he was a resident at Eastcroft Nursing Home; - Nursing Home records were deficient in their recording of key events following his unwitnessed fall on 21 December 2022; - There was a delay in seeking medical advice following the unwitnessed fall on 21 December 2022; - The Nursing Home Manager providing conflicting evidence about efforts to obtain medical advice and did not accept that the acute fractures leading to Mr Lawrence’s death occurred whilst he was at the nursing home. - In view of all of the above, the Coroner is concerned that there is an ongoing risk to current residents. ”

    Source location

    Stephen LAWRENCE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Vera Fortey · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Vera Fortey suffered an unwitnessed fall at her care home, after which her mobility and condition deteriorated. Her fractured hip was not medically identified for approximately two and a half days, and she later underwent surgery, declined despite treatment, and died in hospital. The principal concerns were inadequate recording of the fall, missed opportunities to obtain medical assessment, insufficient auditing of residents’ records, and inadequate staff familiarity with the care home’s records system.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to recognise post-fall deterioration and seek timely medical assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “3) Before the fall in the early hours of 25.9.24 Mrs. Fortey was able to mobilise independently. After the fall, a number of entries were made in Mrs. Fortey’s Daily Notes, which referred to her: - Being unable to support herself, having bad mobility and requiring a wheelchair ( 1626hrs 25.9.24 ); - Having very bad mobility and requiring a wheelchair ( 1848hrs 26.9.24 ); - Being very confused and agitated, with very bad mobility ( 0713hrs 27.9.24 ); Despite these obvious changes in her condition, no member of staff identified that these changes might have been due to the fall on 25.9.24. Therefore in the 2½ days after the fall, several opportunities were missed to have Mrs. Fortey medically examined, and for her fractured hip to have been identified and treated sooner. A significant reason for these opportunities being missed was the fact that the original fall was not documented in Mrs. Fortey’s file. ”

    Source location

    Vera Fortey · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Developed an action plan addressing unwitnessed falls, medical attention, record keeping, auditing and staff training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To address the specific items raised in the Regulation 28 Report we drew up an action plan that covered:”

    Source location

    Response from The Willows Care Home
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provided fall prevention and management training to staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of the action plan, fall prevention and management training was provided by Acute Training Solutions Limited on 24 July 2025. A copy of the training certificates is contained at Appendix 2. Page 17 of the appendices outlines the learning objectives for the course.”

    Source location

    Response from The Willows Care Home
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 July 2025

    Open published response
  6. South Yorkshire (Eastern)

    AI-generated summary

    Hazel Gambles · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Hazel Gambles was admitted to hospital after a fall at home and was later found to have sustained a brain bleed in an unwitnessed in-patient fall. She died on 27 January 2025, and the report states that the head injury more than minimally contributed to her death. The principal concerns were failures to complete and implement falls assessments and prevention measures, delay in medical review, inadequate communication with her family, failure to report and investigate the fall, and omission of the fall from the discharge letter.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in medical review following an inpatient fall

    Wider context from the report

    “There are several areas of concern around failures in documentation and failures to follow Trust policy, namely: 1. Lying and standing Blood Pressure was not recorded on admission. 2. There was no documentation of any falls prevention measures at the time of the first falls assessment. 3. There is no evidence of falls prevention measures being put in place following the first falls assessment. 4. There was no falls assessment done at the time of transfer to ward B4. There should have been a falls assessment within six hours of transfer but that did not happen. The assessment took place some 23 hours after admission to the ward, by which time Mrs Gambles had already fallen. 5. Following the in-patient fall there was a delay of over 5 hours before a medical review took place. The note recording the request for medical review is not timed. 6. There was no discussion with Mrs Gambles' family explaining the findings of the CT scan and they were not told about the bleed on the brain. 7. No Datix report was done following the in-patient fall leading to a delay in investigation. 8. The in-patient fall is not mentioned on the Discharge letter. I am concerned that these failures suggest a lack of awareness of, and lack of compliance with, the Trust’s processes on falls assessment and record keeping. ”

    Source location

    Hazel Gambles · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Expand resident-doctor induction content on responding to deteriorating patients and prioritise overnight reviews for clinically deteriorating patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The induction of resident doctors includes sessions on resuscitation and more details are now included on the response to a deteriorating patient. The clinical teams (resident doctors and the acute response team) will prioritise deteriorating patients who need to be reviewed overnight (elevated NEWS2 scores or abnormal neurological signs). The Trust is moving towards employing two medical registrars on call overnight.”

    Source location

    Response from Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 30 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Move towards employing two medical registrars on call overnight.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The induction of resident doctors includes sessions on resuscitation and more details are now included on the response to a deteriorating patient. The clinical teams (resident doctors and the acute response team) will prioritise deteriorating patients who need to be reviewed overnight (elevated NEWS2 scores or abnormal neurological signs). The Trust is moving towards employing two medical registrars on call overnight.”

    Source location

    Response from Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 30 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review national inpatient-falls audit data and share findings and improvement actions for qualifying injured inpatients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have reviewed the national audit of inpatient falls (NAIF) data which demonstrates that the Trust is routinely completing accurate assessments for patients who fell in hospital and sustained an injury. The data confirm that the medical review for these patients is now taking place within 30 minutes.”

    Source location

    Response from Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 30 June 2025

    Open published response
  7. Blackpool and the Fylde

    AI-generated summary

    Keith Ineson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Keith Ineson, a resident at Glenroyd Care Home, suffered an unwitnessed fall on 26 April 2024 and was subsequently treated for a fractured hip. Following surgery, he suffered a choking episode, developed aspiration pneumonia and died at Blackpool Victoria Hospital on 6 May 2024. The principal concern was that observation scores taken after the fall were not all recorded, leaving gaps in the information available to assess whether escalation to medical services was needed and creating a risk of further death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to conduct an appropriate post-fall injury assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “Following the fall on 26 April 2024, I found that the senior carer who checked Mr Ineson for signs of injury had conducted an inappropriate assessment. ”

    Source location

    Keith Ineson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record all post-fall observation scores

    Wider context from the report

    “It was noted in the evidence, that the observation scores taken for Mr Ineson following his fall had not all been recorded in Mr Ineson’s care notes. This left a gap in the evidence as to reviewing the need for escalation to medical services after the fall. I received from witnesses who gave evidence before me, helpful assistance concerning several issues about learning and changes that had been made following Mr Ineson’s death. I could not identify changes to the record keeping system though, and as such found that the issue around the absence of recording observation scores following a fall gave rise to a risk of further death. This was because the record keeping was inaccurate, contained gaps in the information, and engaged my duty under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. ”

    Source location

    Keith Ineson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the EnabLE digital care-planning system for scheduled post-fall observations, alerts and point-of-care recording.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Learned Coroner will recall that in addition to the actions undertaken which were set out in the action plan submitted prior to the inquest, ████████, the Registered Manager of Glenroyd Care Home explained that Barchester has implemented a new digital care planning system called EnabLE which provides Barchester healthcare services with the ability to set up planned post fall interaction scheduled observations that can be recorded at the point of care to ensure accuracy and eliminate the risk of absent recordings. The system is relatively new, and we have completed some additional training with staff and themed supervisions, to ensure they know how to add to the scheduled observations. We are auditing the use of the systems – see below.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver targeted training and supervision on post-fall documentation, escalation, observation recording and lessons learned from the incident.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following the Inquest, Barchester revisited the issue of recording of all resident interactions and observations to ensure this is undertaken clearly, consistently and contemporaneously. We acknowledge that there was a need to improve the accuracy and regularity of record keeping. We have taken appropriate action in relation to training and technology to ensure that all interactions with patients are recorded.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete NEWS2, RESTORE and sepsis training and themed supervision for recognising deteriorating residents.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our new digital system limits any opportunities missing entries in relation to observations. Our observations are recorded on the digital system in a NEWS2 (National Early Warning Score) observation record, rather than manually written. The training for this has been completed in the home, and we also have oversight by the regional Clinical Development Nurse who supports all her homes monthly and looks at the system to make sure everything is recorded as it should be.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the falls policy with clinical staff and reinforce procedures for responding and escalating after falls.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Further, lessons learned as stated above, include correct moving & handling techniques. The falls policy has been reviewed by all clinical staff to ensure that everyone is aware of the policy and procedure following a fall (supported by the NEWS2 and RESTORE training above) therefore any need for escalation to medical services following a patient’s fall will be abundantly clear. The prompt sheets and guides created give an oversight of completion and can be checked by management, thereby mitigating the risk of the recording of inaccurate and irregular observations.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 5 · response
    Published 29 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver moving-and-handling refresher training covering post-fall procedures and techniques to mitigate falls.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, the members of staff involved in the incident attended a Moving & Handling refresher training day with an Operational Trainer on 3rd June 2024. The moving and”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide documentation prompt sheets to support completion of post-fall records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to the training programme and support staff are provided with an added prompt sheet to support them in the completion of documentation. This is part of a “belt and braces” approach to training.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue EnabLE drop-in support, documentation audits and remote monitoring for adherence and learning needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of the continuing programme of learning the region’s EnabLE champion who supports the home with EnabLE will continue with the provision of drop-in sessions, documentation audit and will continue to monitor remotely for any trends in learning needed around the digital system to ensure adherence to the actions triggered in the new system.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete induction, including NEWS2 training, for three new bank nurses.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The training statistics for the home are 100% for NEWS2 in the home which ensures the accuracy, frequency and consistency of recording observations. Every Nurse, Senior carer and Care Practitioner has completed NEWS2 training, and three new bank nurses are in the process of completing their induction of which NEWS2 is part of the process. All NEWS2 training is completed on induction into the home, we have checked the recorded dates of NEWS2 training, and the dates have been recorded in the Learning Management system.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 May 2025

    Open published response
  8. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Derrick Frederick Tully · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Derrick Frederick Tully was found deceased at home on 20 March 2024 after suffering a massive traumatic subdural haemorrhage, following months of falls and declining health. Concerns included unsuitable temporary accommodation, the absence of a key safe despite repeated concerns, an inappropriate reablement care package, failures to record or escalate injuries after a fall, and the discharge of Derrick from a community team without adequately factoring in his cognitive, mental health and safety difficulties.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record significant post-fall injuries in care notes

    Wider context from the report

    “On 20 February Derrick suffered a fall. Severe bruising and swelling developed on his face over the following days but this was not recorded in his care notes by his carers and not escalated until his daughter raised concerns on 24 February. “No concerns” was written in Derrick’s care record and no consideration given to whether he needed to be reviewed by a doctor. ”

    Source location

    Derrick Frederick Tully · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to escalate significant post-fall injuries for medical review

    Wider context from the report

    “On 20 February Derrick suffered a fall. Severe bruising and swelling developed on his face over the following days but this was not recorded in his care notes by his carers and not escalated until his daughter raised concerns on 24 February. “No concerns” was written in Derrick’s care record and no consideration given to whether he needed to be reviewed by a doctor. ”

    Source location

    Derrick Frederick Tully · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver mandatory refresher training on falls, head-injury recognition, recording, and escalation protocols to all care staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. Actions Taken and Proposed Further Action Daryel Care is committed to learning from this incident and has taken and proposes the following actions to mitigate the risk of future similar occurrences:”

    Source location

    Response from Daryel Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Enhance digital photographic injury-upload capability, obtaining explicit client consent in accordance with policy, to supplement written care-note descriptions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. Actions Taken and Proposed Further Action Daryel Care is committed to learning from this incident and has taken and proposes the following actions to mitigate the risk of future similar occurrences:”

    Source location

    Response from Daryel Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update care-documentation guidance and training with structured prompts for detailed injury descriptions and recording the rationale for non-escalation after initial reporting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. Actions Taken and Proposed Further Action Daryel Care is committed to learning from this incident and has taken and proposes the following actions to mitigate the risk of future similar occurrences:”

    Source location

    Response from Daryel Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The fall and developing injury were recorded in care notes, and the head injury was escalated promptly to the multi-disciplinary team.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “a. Recording of the Fall Incident (20 February 2024) The assertion that the fall incident was "not recorded" is factually incorrect based on Daryel Care's existing records. The electronic care note entry for the visit commencing at 19:00 hrs on 20 February 2024, logged at 19:04 hours, explicitly documents the following: “The carer observed Mr Tully upon arrival with a fresh plaster wrap and wound dressing on his scalp. Mr Tully informed the carer he had sustained an injury from a fall. The carer”

    Source location

    Response from Daryel Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 31 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    No inappropriate “No concerns” entry attributable to staff was found in the official electronic care records, so its origin and context cannot be confirmed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “d. Reference to "No Concerns" Entry The PFD report states, ““No concerns” was written in Derrick’s care record". Daryel Care utilises the CM2000 electronic care monitoring and recording system for all care work visit notes. A review of all CM2000 electronic care notes logged by Daryel Care staff for Mr Tully between 20 February 2024 and the final visit on 22 February 2024 has been conducted. This comprehensive review has not located any entry made by a Daryel Care staff member within the CM2000 system during this period that contains the phrase "No concerns" or substantively similar wording used in an inappropriate context (i.e., as an overall assessment negating the known head injury). All located notes contain specific details pertinent to the care provided and observations made, including the entries regarding the head injury referenced above.”

    Source location

    Response from Daryel Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Daryel Care reported the fall to Adult Social Care, while ambulance attendance and hospital treatment had already addressed the immediate response.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is ASC’s understanding that Daryel Care was not requested to provide evidence to the coroner's court of their recording and reporting of the fall on the 20 February 2024. As part of ASC’s response to the PFD Notice, we have engaged Daryel Care who have provided their records. These evidence that on the 20 February 2024 at 19:12 ‘Derek sustained an injury on his face. He said he had an accident when he went out. The injury was plastered. I prompted his medication from the medication box, and he asked me to leave’.”

    Source location

    Response from Islington Council
    Page 4 · response
    Published 31 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Clinical oversight, including decisions about post-discharge medical review, was understood to be led by the Rapid Response team within the multi-agency framework.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “e. Consideration of Medical Review The PFD report raises concern that "no consideration given to whether he needed to be reviewed by a doctor." Daryel Care staff were operating within a complex multi-agency framework where clinical oversight, particularly post-discharge and concerning medication, was understood to be led by the Whittington Health Rapid Response team. The decision-making process regarding further medical review by Daryel Care staff considered the following factors: Firstly, Mr Tully had been assessed and treated at the hospital A&E department immediately following his fall on 20 February and was discharged home. Additionally, Daryel Care had formally escalated the head injury to the MDT (including Rapid Response) on the evening of 20 February. Observations during visits on 21 and 22 February recorded pain (on the 21st) and a swollen eye (on the 22nd).”

    Source location

    Response from Daryel Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Prior hospital assessment, existing MDT escalation, no acute red flags, and imminent care handover supported continued observation without separate immediate medical re-escalation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “e. Consideration of Medical Review The PFD report raises concern that "no consideration given to whether he needed to be reviewed by a doctor." Daryel Care staff were operating within a complex multi-agency framework where clinical oversight, particularly post-discharge and concerning medication, was understood to be led by the Whittington Health Rapid Response team. The decision-making process regarding further medical review by Daryel Care staff considered the following factors: Firstly, Mr Tully had been assessed and treated at the hospital A&E department immediately following his fall on 20 February and was discharged home. Additionally, Daryel Care had formally escalated the head injury to the MDT (including Rapid Response) on the evening of 20 February. Observations during visits on 21 and 22 February recorded pain (on the 21st) and a swollen eye (on the 22nd).”

    Source location

    Response from Daryel Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 March 2025

    Open published response
  9. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Carl Edmond EASTMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Carl Eastman was admitted to hospital after a fall at home and later suffered an unwitnessed fall on 28 July 2024 while in hospital. He sustained an irreversible brain bleed and died in hospital that evening as a direct result of the injury. Concerns included delays in CT scans after falls, widespread communication and record-keeping issues, failure to follow post-fall procedures, and possible wider skills or knowledge deficits among staff.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Wider staff skills and knowledge deficit affecting post-fall care

    Wider context from the report

    “3. As set out above, there was clear evidence that the Trust has put extensive measures in place to address the issue of staff having not followed the Trust’s own post-fall procedures and protocols. However, I am concerned that the issue may not be limited to just those particular protocols and may be indicative of a wider skills/knowledge deficit. ”

    Source location

    Carl Edmond EASTMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide falls-protocol and post-fall-management education through junior-doctor induction and ongoing nursing and medical team education.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of ongoing education for medical and ward nursing teams, emphasis will be placed on the importance of the Trust’s falls protocol at night, which will be included and provided to nursing and medical teams, in conjunction with the hospital at night Standard Operating Procedure (SOP).”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 20 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver regular falls-prevention simulation training, including protocol, post-fall management, documentation, escalation and prevention, to nursing and medical staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There is agreement that a robust and sustainable education plan for falls must be implemented. Following the death of Mr. Eastman, a post falls simulation programme was developed and is in the process of being delivered to all nursing staff. All Clinical Practice Educators have been trained as champions to deliver the falls simulation training to ward staff. Progress of the establishment of this body of work is currently being monitored through the Senior Nurse Matrons’ meeting which takes place weekly, and all areas involved are required to report progress of this implementation by early May 2025.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 20 February 2025

    Open published response
  10. County Durham and Darlington

    AI-generated summary

    Sylvia Margaret Louisa SAVAGE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sylvia Margaret Louisa Savage died on 25 April 2023 at the University Hospital of North Durham from bronchopneumonia, following a fall from her bed at Redwell Hills Care Home on 18 March 2023 and subsequent injuries and decline in health. The concerns included unclear fall-reporting arrangements, ineffective monitoring of her mobilisation, inadequate post-fall medical assessment, missing or insufficient care records, and failure to promptly reassess her care plan after falls.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to obtain timely medical advice after a resident fall

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Mrs Savage's fall in February 2023 was it appears reported to her GP by her daughter and that led to a nurse attending the home to examine her. Staff at the home do not appear to have done so themselves. It is of concern that after a fall the staff within the home should have a mechanism to ensure medical advice is obtained in a timely fashion and that it is documented clearly and not be reliant on family members summoning help for residents themselves when they have become aware of an incident. ”

    Source location

    Sylvia Margaret Louisa SAVAGE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Apply the Group Falls Policy and supporting flowcharts covering falls protocols, referrals, care planning, risk assessment and post-fall actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A Falls Process Flowchart has formed part of the new system in place after April 2021. Since April 2021, all care and clinical team members must complete falls awareness training, delivered by a learning management system complemented by on-site face to face training.”

    Source location

    Response from Four Seasons Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 January 2025

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026