Recurring concern

Unreliable post-fall assessment and clinical response

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 3 Dec 2013•Latest report 30 Mar 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of controls specifically dedicated to post-fall care, including immediate assessment, medication review, neurological observations, clinical direction, medical review, injury escalation, monitoring and handover following a patient fall.

Not included

  • Excludes pre-fall falls-risk assessment and prevention measures unless the report also identifies a post-fall assessment or response failure.
  • Excludes generic clinical review, escalation or documentation deficiencies not specifically connected to care after a patient fall.
  • Excludes delays in ambulance attendance or hospital admission where no post-fall clinical assessment or response deficiency is identified.
  • Excludes unrelated medication-review failures outside the post-fall care process.
Reports
44

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
57

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
76

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Care Quality Commission4
Barts Health NHS Trust2
Royal London Hospital2
Whittington Health NHS Trust2
Alexandra Rose Residential Care Home1
Barchester Healthcare Limited1
Blenheim House1
Bourne House, Old Sarum1
Bupa Care Homes1
Bupa UK Provision1
Care4u Health Care Limited1
Care First Class (UK) Limited1
Charing Healthcare Ltd1
City of Doncaster Council1
County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Mid Kent and Medway

    AI-generated summary

    Lilian Hursell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lilian Hursell died at Pembury Hospital on 6 July 2015 from pneumonia contracted following reduced mobility associated with unstable fractured cervical vertebrae after a fall from bed at Maidstone Care Centre. The concerns included bedrails not being securely engaged and the handling of Lilian Hursell after a significant uncontrolled fall before the extent of her injuries had been assessed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to assess injuries after a significant uncontrolled fall before repositioning the patient

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Nursing and healthcare staff moved a patient onto her back and placed a pillow under her head when the patient had suffered a significant uncontrolled fall onto her face and the extent of her injuries had not been assessed. It was known at the time that this happened that she had suffered a head trauma as she had a bleeding injury to her forehead, she had however additionally suffered a subdural haematoma and had fractures to her cervical vertebra ”

    Source location

    Lilian Hursell · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Instruct all staff not to move a person after a fall until a suitably trained person completes a full assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• All staff have been advised that following a fall no person should be moved until a full assessment by a suitably trained person has been carried out.”

    Source location

    Hursell-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 1 April 2016

    Open published response
  2. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Thomas Anthony Collins · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Thomas Anthony Collins lived in a care home and fell on 22 June 2015, sustaining chest injuries. He was not admitted to hospital at that time, was later admitted on 25 June, and died on 15 July 2015 after treatment for complications including sepsis, pneumonia and respiratory distress. The report raised concerns about paramedic decision-making and the GP’s assessment, including failures to recognise the seriousness of the injury and signs of a flail chest.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to establish whether a patient fall was unwitnessed and its force and details

    Wider context from the report

    “3. On the attendance on the 24th, the doctor noted that the patient had had a fall, but she did not realise it was an unwitnessed fall, so the force and detail thereof was not known by anyone. She noted that the patient found it “was too painful for him to move or to sleep”, and she said it was “evident that he was in agony with pain for him to turn in bed” (sic). She did not ascertain from the care staff that the patient’s chest was “pulsating when breathing”, a classic sign of a flail chest. She conceded that facing the same situation now, she would have admitted him to hospital. This is clearly an area where further training is required.(Haughton Thornley Medical Centres) ”

    Source location

    Thomas Anthony Collins · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Record clear findings, admission or transfer rationale, fall circumstances, and responsibility for complete clinical notes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• When accidents happen in homes and care homes, we will ensure we record very clearly the findings and our rationale for not admitting the patient to hospital or transferring them to hospital. We will obtain more information surrounding the circumstances of a fall. The clinician who makes this decision will take responsibility for ensuring that the notes are complete and clear. We will ask for a detailed account from care home staff of witnessed falls and will obtain information from relatives where appropriate.”

    Source location

    2015-0469-Response-by-Haughton-Thornley-Medical-Centres
    Page 2 · response
    Published 25 November 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Undertake personal reading and clinical updates on assessing and managing falls.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Personal reading and updates on the assessment and management of falls (NICE CG 161: Guidance on the assessment and management of falls (2013)). There are no current local or national published guidelines on the management of falls at home or in care homes. This meeting may highlight further learning or educational needs with the GPs within the practice.”

    Source location

    2015-0469-Response-by-Haughton-Thornley-Medical-Centres
    Page 2 · response
    Published 25 November 2015

    Open published response
  3. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Allan Richard Beasley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Allan Richard Beasley, who had vascular dementia, was admitted to a care home after he could no longer manage at home and experienced multiple falls. Following a further fall, he was diagnosed with cervical spine fractures, developed a chest infection, deteriorated and died. Concerns included inadequate falls-risk assessment, failures to record and escalate falls, inaccurate observation records, and incomplete monitoring and review.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Policy of treating a resident’s first fall as isolated without further action

    Wider context from the report

    “(5) The home has a policy that the first fall of a resident is treated as an isolated incident and no further action is taken. ”

    Source location

    Allan Richard Beasley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    May Hall · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    May Hall fell twice during the night of 11/12 April 2015, banging her head on both occasions, and later died from a subdural haematoma. Staff at Bourne House indicated that they were not aware of a policy for reporting falls or calling an ambulance or emergency doctor, and the report identified a need for clear, regularly reviewed staff training on responding to falls.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to regularly review fall-response training

    Wider context from the report

    “The Bourne House staff indicated that they were not aware of a policy for reporting falls and for calling the ambulance or emergency doctor. There should be clear training as to how any fall should be addressed by the staff and they should sign to confirm that they have received such training which should be regularly reviewed. ”

    Source location

    May Hall · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Black Country

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Ward · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Ward, an 85-year-old care home resident taking warfarin, suffered an unwitnessed fall and head injury on 29 November 2014. He was found unresponsive the following morning and died on 11 December 2014 after a CT confirmed a subdural haematoma. Concerns included staff awareness of the increased bleeding risk associated with head injury while taking warfarin, and the lack of clear policy, training, and escalation procedures for such falls.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a clear procedure for escalation and referral after a patient fall

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Mr Ward was an elderly patient who was at risk of falling and who was on long term warfarin. There is an increased risk of bleeding to elderly patients on warfarin who sustain a head injury. The care staff who attended to Mr Ward appeared to be unaware of the increased risk of bleeding even though there weren’t visible injuries. (2) During the inquest evidence was given in relation to the fall risk assessment and the policy adopted. However, there was no clear policy or training highlighted in dealing with patients who are on anti-coagulant therapy. In addition, it wasn’t clear the procedure for the escalation and referral of patients to qualified medical staff in the event of a fall. ”

    Source location

    Mr Ward · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. Exeter and Greater Devon

    AI-generated summary

    Robert Alan JONES · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Robert Alan JONES suffered multiple falls following a stroke and later deteriorated, dying at South Molton Community Hospital on 1 April 2014. The inquest recorded accidental death, with acute on chronic subdural haematoma and multiple falls due to cerebrovascular accidents. Concerns included inadequate communication about the total number of falls, use of an out-of-date post-falls checklist, and incomplete or incorrectly recorded neurological observations.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use of an out-of-date post-falls checklist lacking required neurological observation details

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) There was no evidence of communication to ensure that all staff including the different GPs visiting, were aware of the total number of falls the patient has sustained. An out of date post falls checklist was used which does not include specific details of the frequency in duration of neurological observations as recommended by NICE, where head injury has occurred and can or cannot be ruled out and the patient did not always have his neurological observations recorded as per the minimum recommended. They were not always recorded correctly on the observation charts. ”

    Source location

    Robert Alan JONES · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise and publish the falls policy and post-falls checklist to specify NICE-based neurological observation frequency and duration after suspected or confirmed head injury.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “(1) Revise the Trust’s falls policy to include the recommended frequency and duration of neurological observations based on NICE guidance for patients where head injury has occurred or cannot be ruled out, and inclusion of relevant history of falls in handovers of care.”

    Source location

    2015-0018-Response-by-Northern-Devon-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 January 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue and disseminate a Trust-wide Patient Safety Alert covering neurological observations, post-falls checklist completion and filing, and inclusion of falls information in briefings and handovers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To support the actions detailed above, the Trust will issue a Patient Safety Alert, which will communicate the need for neurological observations when a head injury has occurred or cannot be ruled out, completion of the post falls checklist, to include the frequency and duration of observations, to ensure the post falls checklist is filed with the patient’s observation chart for ease of access for all Multi-Disciplinary Team members, and to ensure that information relating to falls risk or actual falls is included in safety briefings and bedside handover. Patient Safety Alerts are disseminated across the whole Trust to clinical and managerial leads.”

    Source location

    2015-0018-Response-by-Northern-Devon-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 January 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The recommended safety actions are primarily the responsibility of the hospital trust.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The recommended actions are primarily the responsibility of the hospital trust: I enclose a copy of their Action Plan which I have just received from ████████, Matron of South Molton Community Hospital and which I believe satisfactorily addresses all your concerns and recommended actions.”

    Source location

    2015-0068-Response-by-The-Health-Centre
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 January 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The hospital trust’s action plan is considered to satisfactorily address all concerns and recommended actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The recommended actions are primarily the responsibility of the hospital trust: I enclose a copy of their Action Plan which I have just received from ████████, Matron of South Molton Community Hospital and which I believe satisfactorily addresses all your concerns and recommended actions.”

    Source location

    2015-0068-Response-by-The-Health-Centre
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 January 2015

    Open published response
  7. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Mary Hallworth · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mary Hallworth was a frail, elderly woman living at home who fell from her bed on 18 March 2014 and was found in pain. The principal concern was that no medical attention was sought or considered for 24 hours after the fall and pain; the recorded medical cause of death included a fractured left hip and bronchopneumonia.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to seek or consider medical attention following pain or a fall

    Wider context from the report

    “Despite the deceased being in pain and having fallen, no medical attention was sought or considered for a period of 24 hours. ”

    Source location

    Mary Hallworth · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Irshad ALI · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Irshad Ali was admitted to hospital for drainage of ascites, fell unwitnessed on the ward on 25 March 2014, and later returned with a massive head injury. He died six weeks later following a consequent chest infection. Concerns included missing records of intentional rounding and neurological observations, required pre-discharge checks not being completed, and communication problems around his discharge.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record post-fall neurological observations

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Though the senior sister looking after Mr Ali on the morning of 25 March assured me that neurological observations were carried out hourly after his fall, there was no record of this. Again, the chart appears to have gone missing. ”

    Source location

    Irshad ALI · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Include documentation and falls management in induction for new medical trainees.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Senior medical staff have confirmed that the induction for new medical trainees now includes a section on documentation and management of falls, emphasising the requirement to document actions in the medical records.”

    Source location

    2014-0387-Response-by-Barts-Health-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 August 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold twice-daily safety briefings highlighting the Trust falls protocol.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To ensure that the Trust falls protocol is being complied with, twice daily safety briefings will be held to highlight the falls protocol. Nursing staff have been reminded that the nurse in charge of shift has responsibility for ensuring the correct procedure is followed and documented in the medical notes. Training for nurses in neurological observations is being provided by the Critical Care Outreach Team. Effectiveness will be measured by audit of nurses’ understanding of the falls policy and documentation in the care plan, their understanding of neurological observations, and competence in the performance of neurological observations.”

    Source location

    2014-0387-Response-by-Barts-Health-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 August 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind nursing staff that the nurse in charge is responsible for following and documenting the correct falls procedure.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To ensure that the Trust falls protocol is being complied with, twice daily safety briefings will be held to highlight the falls protocol. Nursing staff have been reminded that the nurse in charge of shift has responsibility for ensuring the correct procedure is followed and documented in the medical notes. Training for nurses in neurological observations is being provided by the Critical Care Outreach Team. Effectiveness will be measured by audit of nurses’ understanding of the falls policy and documentation in the care plan, their understanding of neurological observations, and competence in the performance of neurological observations.”

    Source location

    2014-0387-Response-by-Barts-Health-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 August 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide nurses with neurological-observation training through the Critical Care Outreach Team.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To ensure that the Trust falls protocol is being complied with, twice daily safety briefings will be held to highlight the falls protocol. Nursing staff have been reminded that the nurse in charge of shift has responsibility for ensuring the correct procedure is followed and documented in the medical notes. Training for nurses in neurological observations is being provided by the Critical Care Outreach Team. Effectiveness will be measured by audit of nurses’ understanding of the falls policy and documentation in the care plan, their understanding of neurological observations, and competence in the performance of neurological observations.”

    Source location

    2014-0387-Response-by-Barts-Health-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 August 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit nurses’ falls-policy understanding, care-plan documentation, neurological-observation understanding, and competence in performing neurological observations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To ensure that the Trust falls protocol is being complied with, twice daily safety briefings will be held to highlight the falls protocol. Nursing staff have been reminded that the nurse in charge of shift has responsibility for ensuring the correct procedure is followed and documented in the medical notes. Training for nurses in neurological observations is being provided by the Critical Care Outreach Team. Effectiveness will be measured by audit of nurses’ understanding of the falls policy and documentation in the care plan, their understanding of neurological observations, and competence in the performance of neurological observations.”

    Source location

    2014-0387-Response-by-Barts-Health-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 August 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Appropriate neurological observations were carried out after the fall; the missing chart was inadvertently misfiled.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The missing neurological observation chart has been located and it confirms that appropriate neurological observations were carried out after Mr Ali’s fall. This chart had been inadvertently misfiled.”

    Source location

    2014-0387-Response-by-Barts-Health-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 August 2014

    Open published response
  9. Powys, Bridgend and Glamorgan Valleys

    AI-generated summary

    Vivian Herbert HUNT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Vivian Herbert HUNT, an 84-year-old patient on the Mental Health ward, fell in his hospital room on 3 April 2014 after a similar fall the previous day, sustained a facial injury, deteriorated, and later died from a brain bleed. The report raised concern that no neurological observations were made during specified periods after the falls and facial injury.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to make neurological observations after falls and facial injury

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Despite the fall he suffered on 2nd April and despite suffering a clear injury to his face in the fall on 3rd April 2014, no neurological observations were made of him between 5am on 3rd April and between 12:30 and 13:15pm that day. ”

    Source location

    Vivian Herbert HUNT · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement compliance with neurological investigations following head injury.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. Actions implemented”

    Source location

    2014-0363-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 1 · response
    Published 6 August 2014

    Open published response
  10. Portsmouth and South East Hampshire

    AI-generated summary

    Charles Cecil Lawrence · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Charles Cecil Lawrence fell twice at the residential home where he lived on 2 April 2013, later deteriorated, and was diagnosed with an untreatable spinal injury before dying in hospital on 23 May 2013. The concern identified was that Alexandra Rose Care Home did not have a protocol requiring a doctor to examine a resident who suffered more than one fall within 24 hours.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a protocol for doctor examination of residents after more than one fall in a 24-hour period

    Wider context from the report

    “Alexandra Rose Care Home does not have a protocol of calling out a doctor to examine a resident who suffers more than one fall in a 24 hour period. ”

    Source location

    Charles Cecil Lawrence · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a falls-alert process notifying residents’ surgeries after repeated falls, using fax notification for the agreed practice and direct calls for other surgeries.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The home has devised a ‘falls alert’ notification that will be faxed to the residents doctors surgery should they fall more than once over a 24 hour period. This has been agreed by the Drayton Medical Practice, although I have not as yet received any further response from the two other surgeries that the home uses. In this case the home will call these surgeries direct should a second fall arise within that period. We currently have over 25 residents registered at Drayton Medical Practice which is a substantial amount so I hope that you agree that this is the most important surgery to support us with this protocol.”

    Source location

    2014-0342-Response-by-Alexandra-Rose-Residential-Care-Home
    Page 1 · response
    Published 25 July 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add the falls-alert protocol to every resident’s care plan under mobility and falls-risk assessments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Further to this document, each resident now has this Protocol in their care plans under there mobility and falls risk assessments.”

    Source location

    2014-0342-Response-by-Alexandra-Rose-Residential-Care-Home
    Page 1 · response
    Published 25 July 2014

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026