Recurring concern

Unreliable prison roll-check procedures

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 30 Oct 2013•Latest report 18 Jul 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in prison roll-check processes, including alignment of local policy with officer training, clear procedural requirements, officer understanding, correct performance of roll counts, and dedicated assurance that required roll-check steps are completed.

Not included

  • Excludes general prison observation, welfare-check, staffing or training deficiencies unless they directly concern the prison roll-check process.
  • Excludes ACCT observations, medical assessments and other prisoner-monitoring processes that are not roll checks or roll counts.
  • Excludes failures to record compliance with roll checks where no broader roll-check process failure is supported.
  • Excludes generic policy or training inconsistencies unrelated to prison roll checks.
Reports
7

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
8

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
14

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

HM Prison and Probation Service4
Belmarsh Prison1
Department of Health and Social Care1
Government Legal Department1
HM Prison Service1
Ministry of Justice1
National Offender Management Service Equality, Rights and Decency Group1
Northumberland Prison1
Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust1
Swaleside Prison1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Inner West London

    AI-generated summary

    Patryk Gladysz · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Patryk Gladysz, who had schizophrenia and was detained at HMP Wandsworth, was found in his cell with a ligature around his neck on 5 January 2024 and died at St George’s Hospital. The inquest concluded that he had hung himself with a ligature, with his intentions unknown. Concerns included delays and staffing pressures affecting mental health assessments, inadequate communication between prison and healthcare staff, gaps in knowledge of his history and risks, and shortcomings in prison monitoring and training.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ongoing challenges in prison officer checks of roll calls and ACCT observations

    Wider context from the report

    “(5) Prison officer checks of roll calls/ACCT observations - recent audit by HMP Wandsworth suggests on-going challenges. ”

    Source location

    Patryk Gladysz · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Brief prison staff on roll-check responsibilities, including timely completion and obtaining a wellbeing response from each prisoner.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Prison staff have received briefings with regards to their responsibilities during roll checks, including the need for timely completion and the requirement for a response to be gained from the prisoner to ensure their wellbeing. This has resulted in an improvement in documented roll check timings. The Governor of HMP Wandsworth has now also implemented a monthly assurance check, which cross references documented ACCT observations against CCTV footage. Appropriate action is taken against any member of staff who does not complete these checks in line with national policy.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement monthly assurance checks comparing documented ACCT observations with CCTV footage and take action on non-compliance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Prison staff have received briefings with regards to their responsibilities during roll checks, including the need for timely completion and the requirement for a response to be gained from the prisoner to ensure their wellbeing. This has resulted in an improvement in documented roll check timings. The Governor of HMP Wandsworth has now also implemented a monthly assurance check, which cross references documented ACCT observations against CCTV footage. Appropriate action is taken against any member of staff who does not complete these checks in line with national policy.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    HM Prison and Probation Service or the Ministry of Justice is responsible for addressing concerns about prison staff knowledge, checks and suicide prevention observations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I would expect your concerns around poor knowledge among prison staff, prison officer checks during roll calls and suicide prevention observations to be addressed by HM Prison and Probation Service and/or the Ministry of Justice in their responses to you.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 July 2025

    Open published response
  2. East Sussex

    AI-generated summary

    Giuseppe TABONE and Andrew EVANS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Giuseppe Tabone and Andrew Evans died at HMP Lewes after intentionally inhaling isotonitazene, a synthetic opioid. Prison staff failed to carry out required roll checks at 7.30pm and 8.45pm on 27 June 2022, and the report raises concerns about staff compliance with, understanding of, and monitoring of required prisoner checks.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Confusion about when full prisoner roll checks are required

    Wider context from the report

    “At the inquest, two prison staff admitted that they had independently failed to carry out the required roll checks on L wing at 7.30pm and 8.45pm on the evening of 27 June 2022. One officer recorded on the wing log book that he had carried out the 7.30pm check, even though he did not do so. The other gave evidence that he did not carry out the 8.45pm check because he was distracted by the day shift officers, who were watching videos in the control room and were not responding to prisoner's cell bell calls. The staff members concerned have been subject to disciplinary proceedings, but continue to work at the prison. It was not possible to say on the evidence whether Andrew or Giuseppe’s lives could have been saved had the required roll checks been carried out. Evidence was given that, since this incident, staff have been provided with ‘bite size’ training on roll checks, although neither of the staff members concerned had received this training. I remain concerned that there is a risk of future deaths caused by prison staff at HMP Lewes failing to carry out the required checks on prisoners, particularly during the night state. The purpose of roll checks is to ensure that each prisoner is present and alive and well. If a roll check is not carried out, there is a risk that a prisoner in need of medical attention and unable to ring the cell bell could remain undiscovered until the morning. There was confusion from staff at the prison as to when full roll checks are required. Further, I am concerned that staff may know when roll checks are required but not fully understand the importance of carrying out every required check. Both staff members concerned were aware that the roll check was required, but did not carry it out because they thought that checks had been carried out by other staff members. I am also concerned that there are insufficient measures in place to monitor staff to ensure that all required checks are being carried out. There may be lessons that can be learnt from other prisons as to how to ensure checks are always carried out. ”

    Source location

    Giuseppe TABONE and Andrew EVANS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure by staff to understand the importance of completing every required roll check

    Wider context from the report

    “At the inquest, two prison staff admitted that they had independently failed to carry out the required roll checks on L wing at 7.30pm and 8.45pm on the evening of 27 June 2022. One officer recorded on the wing log book that he had carried out the 7.30pm check, even though he did not do so. The other gave evidence that he did not carry out the 8.45pm check because he was distracted by the day shift officers, who were watching videos in the control room and were not responding to prisoner's cell bell calls. The staff members concerned have been subject to disciplinary proceedings, but continue to work at the prison. It was not possible to say on the evidence whether Andrew or Giuseppe’s lives could have been saved had the required roll checks been carried out. Evidence was given that, since this incident, staff have been provided with ‘bite size’ training on roll checks, although neither of the staff members concerned had received this training. I remain concerned that there is a risk of future deaths caused by prison staff at HMP Lewes failing to carry out the required checks on prisoners, particularly during the night state. The purpose of roll checks is to ensure that each prisoner is present and alive and well. If a roll check is not carried out, there is a risk that a prisoner in need of medical attention and unable to ring the cell bell could remain undiscovered until the morning. There was confusion from staff at the prison as to when full roll checks are required. Further, I am concerned that staff may know when roll checks are required but not fully understand the importance of carrying out every required check. Both staff members concerned were aware that the roll check was required, but did not carry it out because they thought that checks had been carried out by other staff members. I am also concerned that there are insufficient measures in place to monitor staff to ensure that all required checks are being carried out. There may be lessons that can be learnt from other prisons as to how to ensure checks are always carried out. ”

    Source location

    Giuseppe TABONE and Andrew EVANS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the roll-check process against new staffing profiles and regime planning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following the inquest into the deaths of Mr Tabone and Mr Evans, the prison is reviewing roll checks to ensure that processes are in line with new staffing profiles and regime planning which is currently being reviewed and updated. Once this work is complete, a new notice to staff will be issued setting out learning from the inquest around roll checks.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue a staff notice communicating learning from the inquest about roll checks after the review is complete.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following the inquest into the deaths of Mr Tabone and Mr Evans, the prison is reviewing roll checks to ensure that processes are in line with new staffing profiles and regime planning which is currently being reviewed and updated. Once this work is complete, a new notice to staff will be issued setting out learning from the inquest around roll checks.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and clarify the roll-check local operating procedure, including required times and recording arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Governor of HMP Lewes has informed me that the prison’s LOP on roll checks was reviewed in August 2023 and clearly sets out the times that roll checks are required to be carried out and where staff must sign to confirm that the checks have been completed. The LOP provides guidance on checks during the week, on weekends and during the night state so that staff understand what their duties are at all times.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish staff notices reinforcing the importance of completing roll checks and prompting key safety observations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am also informed that the prison has published notices to staff highlighting the importance of carrying out roll checks in line with expectations. A notice to staff was issued in August 2023 which prompts staff to consider three points when carrying out roll checks:”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue taking appropriate action, including disciplinary action where necessary, when staff fail to meet roll-check expectations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Staff are aware that CCTV is in use around the establishment and that their actions may be scrutinised following an incident such as a death in custody. If staff are found to have failed to carry out the required tasks or when there is a question over their performance and ability there will be a thorough investigation to determine what has happened and to ensure that staff who fail to uphold the values of HMPPS by putting prisoner’s safety at risk are held to account through disciplinary procedures. Staff are aware that failure to carry out the duties entrusted to them will result in disciplinary action, and that, depending on the circumstances, the outcome may range from advice and guidance in order to support them to perform better, to dismissal from the service.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver further bite-size roll-check training sessions, prioritising staff who previously lacked the training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I can confirm that HMP Lewes has planned further sessions of ‘bite size’ training on roll checks. The two members of staff who gave evidence that they had not received the training will be required to attend as a priority. Additionally, the prison has received support from the standards coaching team, a national resource, which consisted of a team of experienced prison staff shadowing officers at HMP Lewes to provide support and on-the-job training. The team covered roll checks as part of the support.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide on-the-job roll-check support and training through standards coaching team staff shadowing officers at HMP Lewes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I can confirm that HMP Lewes has planned further sessions of ‘bite size’ training on roll checks. The two members of staff who gave evidence that they had not received the training will be required to attend as a priority. Additionally, the prison has received support from the standards coaching team, a national resource, which consisted of a team of experienced prison staff shadowing officers at HMP Lewes to provide support and on-the-job training. The team covered roll checks as part of the support.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing roll-check assurance measures and staff accountability are considered sufficient; staff must be trusted to perform required duties.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I understand that evidence was given at the inquest on the assurance measures in place for roll checks at the prison but that you remain concerned that the measures are insufficient. Whilst I am also concerned to learn of instances where staff have not carried out their duties in line with clear expectations, we must be able to trust staff to carry out the required tasks that are fundamental to their role. HMP Lewes also holds a daily briefing which provides an opportunity to update and remind staff of the duties to be carried out as well as to convey any other important information.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 March 2024

    Open published response
  3. Mid Kent and Medway

    AI-generated summary

    Idris HABIB · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Idris Habib was found suspended in his cell at HMP Swaleside after incidents involving self-harm, a cell fire and statements that he was being bullied and wanted to kill himself. The inquest concluded that he took his own life by hanging, although his intention was unclear. Concerns included medication from a previous occupant being found in the cell, a disconnect between local policy and training on roll checks, and the need to ensure welfare checks were conducted and documented.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to align local roll-check policy with entry-level officer training

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) There was a disconnect between HMP Swaleside's local policy and the Prison Officer Entry Level Training in respect of roll checks ”

    Source location

    Idris HABIB · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. Inner South London

    AI-generated summary

    Jason O’Rourke · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jason O’Rourke died by suicide in his cell at HMP Belmarsh after hanging himself with a bedsheet ligature between 7.28 pm on 1 April 2019 and 9.33 am on 2 April 2019. The jury identified possible contributing factors including inadequate follow-up of his mental health, insufficient sharing and understanding of information about his mental health and self-harm history, and inadequate safety intervention meetings. The report also raised concerns about unclear self-harm and suicide risk assessments on arrival and the lack of robust auditing of nightly roll checks.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of robust management audit of nightly roll checks

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The nightly roll checks at HMP Belmarsh are due to be carried out by a single member of Operational Support Grade (OSG) staff at 9.00 pm and 6.00 am. Their stated purpose is to check for escape or death among the prisoners. On handing over to the morning staff, the OSG signs paperwork indicating that the roll checks have been completed. There is no robust system by which the prison management audit this process. This means that the prison management can be under the impression that the checks have been carried out, when they have not been, as occurred here. ”

    Source location

    Jason O’Rourke · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require a discipline officer to remain on the wing until each night OSG roll check is completed, recorded, signed and reported, with spot checks of compliance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the light of the concerns that you have expressed, the Governor of HMP Belmarsh is working with the Long Term and High Security Estate (LTHSE) safety team to review the quality assurance processes in place for roll checks. As a first step, a system has been implemented whereby when a night OSG arrives a discipline officer remains on the wing until a full roll check has been completed, recorded and signed for on the wing and reported to the Orderly Officer. Spot checks are in place to ensure that the process is being followed. The LTHSE safety team will be visiting Belmarsh to identify further opportunities for improvement and to test compliance with this new process, and the LSS more generally.”

    Source location

    2021-0032-Response-from-HMPPS-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 February 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the quality-assurance processes for roll checks with the LTHSE safety team.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the light of the concerns that you have expressed, the Governor of HMP Belmarsh is working with the Long Term and High Security Estate (LTHSE) safety team to review the quality assurance processes in place for roll checks. As a first step, a system has been implemented whereby when a night OSG arrives a discipline officer remains on the wing until a full roll check has been completed, recorded and signed for on the wing and reported to the Orderly Officer. Spot checks are in place to ensure that the process is being followed. The LTHSE safety team will be visiting Belmarsh to identify further opportunities for improvement and to test compliance with this new process, and the LSS more generally.”

    Source location

    2021-0032-Response-from-HMPPS-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 February 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Visit Belmarsh to identify further roll-check improvements and test compliance with the new process and Local Security Strategy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the light of the concerns that you have expressed, the Governor of HMP Belmarsh is working with the Long Term and High Security Estate (LTHSE) safety team to review the quality assurance processes in place for roll checks. As a first step, a system has been implemented whereby when a night OSG arrives a discipline officer remains on the wing until a full roll check has been completed, recorded and signed for on the wing and reported to the Orderly Officer. Spot checks are in place to ensure that the process is being followed. The LTHSE safety team will be visiting Belmarsh to identify further opportunities for improvement and to test compliance with this new process, and the LSS more generally.”

    Source location

    2021-0032-Response-from-HMPPS-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 February 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Routine CCTV monitoring cannot be used to assure roll checks because CCTV is authorised only for specified safety, security or investigative circumstances.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I understand that the question of using CCTV for assurance was explored at the inquest. CCTV is deployed in prisons for reasons of safety and security and not for general surveillance or monitoring staff performance. Playback of CCTV coverage is only authorised in certain circumstances, such as where there is reason to believe that safety or security has been compromised, or to assist with a formal investigation. Where there is suspicion that roll checks are not being carried out, CCTV could be used as part of an investigation into those suspicions, but it cannot routinely be monitored as part of the assurance process. Staff are aware that CCTV is in use around the establishment and that their actions may be scrutinised following an incident such as a death in custody.”

    Source location

    2021-0032-Response-from-HMPPS-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 February 2021

    Open published response
  5. North Northumberland

    AI-generated summary

    Vincent Oliver · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Vincent Oliver was serving a prison sentence at HMP Northumberland when his lifeless body was discovered in his cell on 4 July 2013, shortly after the cells were unlocked. The principal concern was that the prison officer unlocking his cell did not obtain a response or check his physical well-being before moving on, and that cell-unlocking procedures had not been followed on other occasions. The inquest concluded that he died from natural causes, namely ischaemic heart disease and coronary artery atheroma.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to obtain a response from each prisoner during cell unlocking and roll checks

    Wider context from the report

    “The prison officer unlocking Mr Oliver’s cell on 4th July 2013 at approximately 5.40 p.m. for the evening meal did not check on his physical well-being by getting a response from him, before moving on to the next cell. This led to Mr Oliver, who had died some time earlier and was affected by rigor mortis, being found by another prisoner when he entered Mr Oliver’s cell. There has been a number of other occasions at the prison when appropriate cell unlocking procedures have not been followed and the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman has made recommendations about this previously. I understand that a Prison Director’s Order has been issued requiring that on roll check Prison Officers must obtain a response from each prisoner to ensure their physical presence and well-being. My understanding of the procedures is that there is no current requirement for the Officer completing the roll check to record on the roll check report that he or she has complied with the requirements of the above Order. ”

    Source location

    Vincent Oliver · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. West Yorkshire (East)

    AI-generated summary

    Ryan Patrick John Clark · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ryan Patrick John Clark, aged 17, died on 18 April 2011 after being discovered in his cell at HMYOI Wetherby with a ligature around his neck; his death was certified at Harrogate District Hospital. The concerns included ineffective implementation of the Personal Officer Scheme, failures in ACCT checks and trainee roll counts, and insufficient first-aid and CPR training for prison officers.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of Prison Officers to follow the correct procedure for roll counts of trainees

    Wider context from the report

    “At HMYOI Wetherby (1) The Personal Officer Scheme was not properly implemented and did not operate effectively vis a vis trainees; (2) ACCT checks of a trainee were not made and/or were not made in accordance with the times prescribed by the trainee's ACCT document; (3) The correct procedure when conducting a roll count of trainees was not adopted by Prison Officers; (4) Prison Officers were not fully conversant in the administration of first aid and CPR and had not received regular refresher training in relation thereto. ”

    Source location

    Ryan Patrick John Clark · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Brief all staff on the importance of conducting roll checks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Roll Checks The two failures to follow the procedure for roll checks identified in this case have been the subject of investigations, and disciplinary action has been taken against the staff involved. All staff have been briefed on the importance of roll checks, and these are now subject to covert checks by managers. If, following a cover check, there is any doubt as to whether or not a proper roll check was carried out, CCTV evidence is examined, and a disciplinary investigation is instigated where necessary.”

    Source location

    2014-0057-Response-by-NOMS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 February 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct covert managerial checks of roll checks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Roll Checks The two failures to follow the procedure for roll checks identified in this case have been the subject of investigations, and disciplinary action has been taken against the staff involved. All staff have been briefed on the importance of roll checks, and these are now subject to covert checks by managers. If, following a cover check, there is any doubt as to whether or not a proper roll check was carried out, CCTV evidence is examined, and a disciplinary investigation is instigated where necessary.”

    Source location

    2014-0057-Response-by-NOMS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 February 2014

    Open published response
  7. Liverpool

    AI-generated summary

    Damion Anthony Andre Martin · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Damion Anthony Andre Martin was remanded to HMP Liverpool on 6 December 2011 and was found hanging in the toilet area of his cell on 11 December 2011; attempts to resuscitate him were unsuccessful. The report raised concerns about the identification of domestic-abuse-related suicide risk during reception, basic life-support refresher training, the restricted view into the toilet area, and whether a prison officer completed a roll-check visit.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to visit the prisoner’s cell during a roll check

    Wider context from the report

    “Notwithstanding documentation to the contrary, a prison officer upon his roll check at approximately 5.15am did not visit Mr Martin’s cell. ”

    Source location

    Damion Anthony Andre Martin · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026