Recurring concern
Inadequate safety guidance for CT scanning and reporting
- Reports that mention this concern
- 11
- Times this concern has been raised
- 12
- Stated actions linked to this concern
- 21
What this concern includes
Includes failures of guidance, protocols, pathways or related staff understanding specifically governing CT indications, contraindications, safe scanning arrangements, treatment-related CT decisions and reporting requirements.
What is not included
- Excludes general CT access, scanner capacity, scheduling or completion delays when no CT safety-guidance deficiency is identified.
- Excludes failures limited to interpretation, follow-up or clinical action after a CT result when the CT guidance itself was adequate.
- Excludes generic clinical training, documentation or governance deficiencies not specifically tied to safe CT scanning or reporting.
- Excludes guidance for a separately bounded condition or pathway, such as aortic dissection, unless the assertion also supports the wider CT-scanning safety-guidance concern.
Trends
Reports over time
Reports mentioning this concern, over time
Reports about this concern issued each year.
* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.
Most frequent recipients
Most frequent recipients
Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.
Reports and published responses 11 reports
See individual reports that have raised this concern, and the actions taken in response
-
Concerns raised1
Failure to account for contraindications to CT scanning in seriously injured trauma patients
This report raised 2 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
No linked response statementsNo respondent-stated action or position is linked to these concerns in the published data.
Actions and positions describe what organisations say in published responses. Implementation is not independently verified.
Data last updated 7 September 2026