Recurring concern

Unsafe coordination of shared care

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 1 May 2015•Latest report 15 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of the explicitly shared-care process, including unclear arrangements for documenting discussions, ineffective coordination between organisations or teams, and failures to communicate decisions or responsibilities across shared-care providers.

Not included

  • Excludes generic record-keeping failures not tied to an explicitly shared-care arrangement.
  • Excludes generic communication or multidisciplinary-discussion failures where shared care is not the named process.
  • Excludes failures confined to a single provider's assessment, treatment, staffing or resources without a shared-care coordination link.
Reports
29

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
33

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2015–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
106

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care10
NHS England6
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust2
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board2
NHS Northamptonshire Integrated Care Board2
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust2
Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust2
ADS (Addiction Dependency Solutions)1
Aneurin Bevan University LHB1
Ashfield House Surgery1
Bamford Grange Care Home1
Bolton Borough Council1
Brighton and Hove City Council1
Care Quality Commission1
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent

    AI-generated summary

    Anne Patricia Leake · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Anne Patricia Leake suffered cardiac arrest and arrhythmia, underwent heart valve surgery, and was released from hospital without the planned ICD being fitted. Three days later, she suffered a cardiac arrhythmia and died. The report identified concerns about hospital teams using inaccessible ward-based notes, the absence of a shared electronic records system, and continued reliance on manual transcription of treatment decisions.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of shared accessible medical notes across hospital teams

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Mrs Leake received treatment from three hospital teams: cardiology, cardiothoracic surgery and coronary intensive care. Each team uses their own ward-based medical notes which are not accessible by the other teams. Whilst each team has access to the iPortal system on which Mrs Leake’s MDT decision was stored, it was apparent that this was not accessed and acted upon. As a result, the MDT decision regarding Mrs Leake’s ICD was overlooked. (2) Plans to introduce electronic patient records to which all medical teams have access are still at an early stage and no date has been identified for moving over to a single electronic notes system. (3) The steps which the Trust has taken as a result of Mrs Leake’s death to address the risk of MDT decisions being missed in the future still rely upon the manual transcription of decisions from one set of medical notes to another, with the continuing potential for human error and important decisions about treatment being overlooked. ”

    Source location

    Anne Patricia Leake · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reliance on manual transcription of treatment decisions between medical notes

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Mrs Leake received treatment from three hospital teams: cardiology, cardiothoracic surgery and coronary intensive care. Each team uses their own ward-based medical notes which are not accessible by the other teams. Whilst each team has access to the iPortal system on which Mrs Leake’s MDT decision was stored, it was apparent that this was not accessed and acted upon. As a result, the MDT decision regarding Mrs Leake’s ICD was overlooked. (2) Plans to introduce electronic patient records to which all medical teams have access are still at an early stage and no date has been identified for moving over to a single electronic notes system. (3) The steps which the Trust has taken as a result of Mrs Leake’s death to address the risk of MDT decisions being missed in the future still rely upon the manual transcription of decisions from one set of medical notes to another, with the continuing potential for human error and important decisions about treatment being overlooked. ”

    Source location

    Anne Patricia Leake · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a digital vision and strategy including a goal for a new electronic patient record across the Integrated Care System.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst the Trust aspires to acquire a new, highly sophisticated, purpose-built single EPR system, this will necessitate securing significant capital investment, development and time to ensure safe deployment. To support this ambition, the trust is currently engaged in setting out a new digital vision and strategy, which includes the goal for a new EPR across the whole Integrated Care System (ICS).”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 27 December 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Draft a business case with the Integrated Care System to apply for NHS funding for an interoperable electronic patient record.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The UНNM digital team together with the ICS, are drafting a business case to apply for NHS funding for an EPR that will meet our growing needs and provide the functionality and interoperability required to prevent the events that contributed to Mrs Leake’s death.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 27 December 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    A single Trust-wide EPR cannot currently be implemented because it requires substantial investment, development and deployment time, and existing infrastructure is limited.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst the Trust aspires to acquire a new, highly sophisticated, purpose-built single EPR system, this will necessitate securing significant capital investment, development and time to ensure safe deployment. To support this ambition, the trust is currently engaged in setting out a new digital vision and strategy, which includes the goal for a new EPR across the whole Integrated Care System (ICS).”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 27 December 2024

    Open published response
  2. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Kelly Marie STEVENS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kelly Stevens, who had profound learning and physical disabilities and received nutrition, hydration and medication via a PEG tube, was admitted to hospital on 28 December 2023. She suffered a seizure on 3 January 2024 caused by an excessively low, unrecognised sodium level, aspirated vomit, developed aspiration pneumonia and died in hospital later that night. Concerns included the absence of clear overall consultant responsibility, failure to monitor electrolytes and record fluid intake and output properly, and the copying of outdated care plans in her notes.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure overall consultant responsibility for patients receiving care from multiple teams

    Wider context from the report

    “1) Despite being under the care of the medical team, Ms. Stevens did also receive input from the surgical team. Her situation was further complicated by the fact that for most of her admission she was placed as a medical outlier on a surgical ward. In the event, no one consultant was in overall charge of her care, which meant that the issues identified in this case were not picked up on. I heard evidence that there was no policy in place at the Trust to give guidance as to how this sort of situation should be resolved, but instead that it was expected that consultants would liaise with each other in order to do so. That did not happen in this case; ”

    Source location

    Kelly Marie STEVENS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share, approve and implement the agreed policy for managing medical outliers and assigning overall responsibility for their care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1) At the time of the incident, there was no policy in place for the management of medical outliers. In the action plan of the report the Chief Medical Officer (CMO) has an action relating to the review of a patient outlier policy and to taking over patient care. These actions are almost completed. Meetings were held between the senior clinical leaders and the Chief Medical Officer on 11th October 2024 and the 4th November to review the policy. The policy has been agreed and will be shared through the Improving Safety Actions Group (ISAG) on 14th November 2024 and approved through Trust Management Board on 20th November 2024 with immediate implementation thereafter.”

    Source location

    Response from Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 25 September 2024

    Open published response
  3. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Richard Thomas SHANNON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Richard Thomas Shannon was discharged from hospital on 5 January 2022 with an almost completely healed sacral pressure ulcer and was readmitted on 13 January with a severe, necrotic ulcer. The report states that inadequate monitoring of his skin integrity and failures in discharge planning and coordination among hospital, nursing, social care and care-provider services were substantive concerns. He died as a consequence of the severe pressure ulcer, with the medical cause of death including infected sacral pressure ulcer and coccyx osteomyelitis.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to establish daily skin-integrity monitoring responsibility

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Upon discharge, UCH sent a referral to the district nurses. This included notification of a grade 2 pressure ulcer and a high risk of pressure ulcers in the future. Professor Shannon had three significant risk factors. He was immobile, he had diabetes, and he had already suffered a pressure ulcer. The UCH nurses expected the district nurses to check the skin integrity every day. The district nurses did not intend to include this in their daily tasks when they attended the home to assist with insulin administration for diabetic control and with catheter care. If the district nurses had been invited and had attended the UCH discharge planning meeting, this misunderstanding could easily have been identified and the true position understood by all. ”

    Source location

    Richard Thomas SHANNON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish a dedicated telephone number and contact time for discussing hospital discharges.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• We have enhanced lines of communication between our teams, by setting up a specific phone number and time when the nurses will be able to discuss hospital discharges.”

    Source location

    Response from Central London Community Healthcare
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Invite District Nurses to University College Hospital NHS Trust meetings for complex discharges.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The District Nurses are now invited to meetings with University College Hospital NHS Trust for any complex discharges.”

    Source location

    Response from Central London Community Healthcare
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Set up a dedicated telephone line and contact time for nurses to discuss hospital discharges.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• We have enhanced lines of communication between our teams, by setting up a specific phone number and time when the nurses will be able to discuss hospital discharges.”

    Source location

    Response from Central London Community Healthcare
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Invite district nurses to University College Hospital NHS Trust meetings for complex discharges.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The District Nurses are now invited to meetings with University College Hospital NHS Trust for any complex discharges.”

    Source location

    Response from Central London Community Healthcare
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share discharge communications and care plans with all providers involved in patients’ care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• All communications including care plans are now being shared with all providers involved in care at discharge to ensure consistency in care provision.”

    Source location

    Response from Central London Community Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and improve information shared with carers before vulnerable adults are discharged, including holistic-care instructions and pressure-damage prevention equipment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The Central London Community Healthcare NHS Trust District Nursing Team has worked with University College Hospital NHS Trust and The City of Westminster to review and improve the quality of information we share with carers, prior to a vulnerable adult being discharged from hospital. This includes giving clear instructions regarding holistic care requirements and the equipment needed to reduce the risk of pressure damage.”

    Source location

    Response from Central London Community Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide the UCLH discharge team with district-nursing contact details and weekday availability for discussing discharges.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• UCLH has liaised with Central London Community Health (CLCH) to improve links with district nurses. The UCLH discharge team now has the phone number of the district nurses and know that between 2-4pm Monday-Friday, the team will be available to discuss any discharges.”

    Source location

    Response from University College London Hospitals
    Page 4 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold monthly partnership meetings with CLCH and partners to review progress, share learning, develop joint working, and collaborate on discharge-care improvements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• We have set up monthly review meetings with CLCH to ensure the partnership working continues to develop and improve including, enhancing UCLH’s understanding of the district nurse role. This will also include joint education and training, to better understand roles and responsibilities and reduce silo working and gaps in care.”

    Source location

    Response from University College London Hospitals
    Page 4 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Contact district nurses whenever they are involved in an adult’s care to incorporate pressure-ulcer and other relevant needs into care plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Kapital Care coordinators will contact district nurses in all cases when it is identified they are involved in the adult’s care arrangements. This will ensure any care and support needs relating to pressure ulcer management and other relevant care needs can be implemented as part of our care plans.”

    Source location

    Response from Kapital Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ensure robust and timely communication with all agencies involved in care arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Kapital care is ensuring robust and timely communication is undertaken with all agencies.”

    Source location

    Response from Kapital Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish direct communication links between the hospital discharge team and district nurses for discharge discussions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• UCLH has liaised with Central London Community Health (CLCH) to improve links with district nurses. The UCLH discharge team now has the phone number of the district nurses and know that between 2-4pm Monday-Friday, the team will be available to discuss any discharges.”

    Source location

    Response from University College London Hospital
    Page 4 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold monthly partnership meetings with community health services to develop joint working and improve understanding of district-nurse roles.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• We have set up monthly review meetings with CLCH to ensure the partnership working continues to develop and improve including, enhancing UCLH’s understanding of the district nurse role. This will also include joint education and training, to better understand roles and responsibilities and reduce silo working and gaps in care.”

    Source location

    Response from University College London Hospital
    Page 4 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide joint education and training with community health services to clarify roles and responsibilities and reduce care gaps.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• We have set up monthly review meetings with CLCH to ensure the partnership working continues to develop and improve including, enhancing UCLH’s understanding of the district nurse role. This will also include joint education and training, to better understand roles and responsibilities and reduce silo working and gaps in care.”

    Source location

    Response from University College London Hospital
    Page 4 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Contact district nurses whenever they are involved in an adult’s care arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Kapital care coordinators will contact district nurses in all cases when it is identified they are involved in the adult’s care arrangements. This will ensure any care and support needs relating to pressure ulcer management and other relevant care needs can be implemented as part of our care plans.”

    Source location

    Response from Kapital Care (UK) Limited
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Improved local processes, staff education and monthly partnership reviews are considered sufficient to address discharge and post-discharge safety concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have reviewed and improved our local processes and education for staff to prevent further poor outcomes for patients. This is significantly strengthened by working collaboratively with our partners in the community and social care. We are confident this improved approach will enhance the quality and safety of the hospital discharge process and care outside of hospital. We are confident that we have addressed the concerns raised to ensure the care we provide to patients is safe and holistic. To assure ourselves and others, we have agreed to meet monthly as a newly formed partnership to review progress against these actions, share learning and collaborate on improvements.”

    Source location

    Response from University College London Hospitals
    Page 6 · response
    Published 8 December 2022

    Open published response
  4. North Yorkshire and York including North Yorkshire Western District

    AI-generated summary

    Zoe Emma ZAREMBA · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Zoe Emma ZAREMBA, who had a history of repeated self-harm and suicide attempts, ingested an unknown quantity of a substance after going missing from home and was found unresponsive on 21 June 2020; her death was established as resulting from the ingestion. The report identified concerns about clinicians’ failure to understand and adapt care to her autism, the unsubstantiated attribution of Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder, inadequate coordinated mental health support, and the absence of effective care planning and risk assessment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of communication and shared information across autism and mental health teams

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence indicated: 1 Zoe was diagnosed at age 16 years as being autistic by CAMHS with a designation of Asperger’s Syndrome. Her medical records recorded that. 2 In or about 2016 she was wrongly attributed by the Mental Health Service, TEWV, clinicians - who knew of her autism -as undergoing Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder (“EUPD”). 3 That attribution was not formally diagnosed, and not discussed with Zoe who found out by chance when looking at her records. She continued to be regarded and treated as if she was experiencing that condition and clinicians would not adapt to her distress caused by that attribution. There was inertia and excessive delay (to May 2020) in removing reference to EUPD which had been discounted in October 2018 all of which added to her distress. These actions and inactions destroyed her relationship with community mental health clinicians and she did not trust them enough to try to restore any effective care relationship. 4 She suffered repeated trauma derived from her autistic condition revisiting the causes of her distress which she re-experienced time and again with ‘film reel’ recollection. That trauma was again not understood. 5 In short, her autism (and thus risk assessment) was misunderstood by the clinicians tasked to keep her safe. 6 TEWV’s provision for cares of autistic conditions were underdeveloped, reflecting national want of provision, to include:- A no multidisciplinary clinical assessment and formulation addressed her autism; B no reasonable adjustments were then made in terms of her sensory and environmental needs in any timely fashion, or at all; C no person centred (thus autism centred) holistic plan was developed to work in partnership with Zoe that took account of her autism, and her gender. As the evidence revealed one “cannot uncouple autism and other psychological/psychiatric experiences”. Instead, she withdrew from engagement with TEWV community health clinicians. D there was no local provision within TEWV for specialist autism assessment and adapted psychological therapy. Commissioned providers of these essential cares were outwith TEWV, requiring specific Funding Request (which was granted) for a course of assessment and therapy. Those providers did not offer statutory acute mental health services support, including out of hours/crisis support. TEWV did not provide what the commissioning providers were supplying. There was a want of effective communications between these ‘teams’ not least as patient data was not accessible by one to the others electronic records (patient consent permitting) and the fact of disengagement. There was a sense of ‘silo’ working, militating against partnership working, that encouraged unfavourably the undesirable “uncoupling” of experiences; E statistical evidence indicated that autistic individuals are more at risk of suicide than those with no neurodevelopmental condition, and females at greater risk than their male counterparts; F there was a clinical (but not measured) experience that more patients were presenting to the statutory service with autistic conditions and, it follows, more patients would be at risk of suicide; G from 2016 to her death, Zoe was detained under ss 2/3 MHA 1983 17 times and presented to A and E around 37 times with evident self harm and apparent attempts on her life. She repeated high risk behaviours. She had no Care Co-ordinator nor effective Care Plan (which ought to have been in place) because she had not engaged with TEWV community services; H Zoe lurched from crisis to crisis remaining at high risk to her own safety; she died because she could no longer cope with the sense of injustice caused by others that overwhelmed her thinking. She felt she was not being listened to by community mental health services. Her therapy from outside providers - which was proving helpful to her - was disrupted by COVID-19 limitations on face to face consultations; Both locally, including regional, but also nationally the evidence revealed a number of serious issues that require urgent and immediate action to support autistic people well, not just from a sensory and environmental basis (which TEWV have started to improve albeit from a low baseline according to the evidence received). Urgent solutions are required to prevent future deaths of autistic patients especially with mental health needs. ”

    Source location

    Zoe Emma ZAREMBA · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with TEWV to resolve internal and external communication issues affecting patient care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The CCG/ICB are aware; from reviewing the evidence from the inquest and from discussions with TEWV that there are communication issues internally and externally which need to be resolved for the benefit of the patient. This appears to go beyond incompatibility of IT systems (for example within the inquest there is reference to the autism service provided to other geographical parts of TEWV but not being available within the North Yorkshire part of the organisation). Both TEWV and the ICB are committed to working closely to resolve this. It is anticipated that ultimately the establishment and development of Provider Collaboratives within the ICB will support with these type of issues in the future.”

    Source location

    Response from Humber and North Yorkshire Health Care Partnership
    Page 4 · response
    Published 27 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Examine patients with autism and EUPD/BPD diagnoses to assess diagnostic validity, communication, withdrawal, reasonable adjustments and tailored therapeutic options.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Within the Trust we have identified 134 patients that have both an Autism marker and a documented diagnosis of Emotionally Unstable Personality disorder (EUPD) which includes Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD).”

    Source location

    Response from TEWV
    Page 3 · response
    Published 27 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Examine records for diagnostic validity, communication, withdrawal, reasonable adjustments and tailored therapeutic options for patients with autism and EUPD diagnoses.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Within the Trust we have identified 134 patients that have both an Autism marker and a documented diagnosis of Emotionally Unstable Personality disorder (EUPD) which includes Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD).”

    Source location

    Reponse from Tees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (17 June)
    Page 3 · response
    Published 27 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce the CITO recording system across all services to clarify diagnoses and support patient record access.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our new patient recording information system (CITO) will not only allow a greater clarity around active and discounted diagnoses but will importantly also support patient access to their own records improving mutual understanding and effective”

    Source location

    Response from Tees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (21 June)
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share learning with clinical teams and work with external partners to improve timely, constructive communication and cohesive patient care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have learned from Zoe’s sad death and shared with our clinical teams the importance of communication with our partners, to ensure that patients’ needs are addressed in a more cohesive and person-centred manner.”

    Source location

    Response from Tees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust (21 June)
    Page 6 · response
    Published 27 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    TEWV is responsible for delivering core mental health care and making reasonable adjustments for patients with autism.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This is therapy which is beyond that which TEWV can provide as the primary mental health provider. That does not change the expectation that TEWV be in a position to make appropriate adjustments to their mental health support for those with any neuro development diagnosis. By this we mean that we would expect TEWV to be in a position to support those with a mental health condition even where they have a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder however it is recognised by the CCG/ICB that there may be cases where there is additional specialist input required. This is when IFR requests are made. The CCG/ICB accepts that this is becoming more frequent and the reasons for this are not clear but are sufficient for the CCG/ICB to be considering the commissioning pathway for this type of therapy.”

    Source location

    Response from Humber and North Yorkshire Health Care Partnership
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 April 2022

    Open published response
  5. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Sheldon Marshall · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sheldon Marshall became seriously ill during a trek to Mount Everest Base Camp after sustaining a fractured left rib, later developing high-altitude pulmonary oedema, bronchopneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome and pneumothoraces. He died in intensive care on 17 December 2017 after cardiac arrests and a pleural injury associated with a right chest drain. The concerns identified were insufficient senior clinical input at Mayday Assistance Limited and unclear responsibility between Mayday Assistance Limited and air ambulance providers for patients’ overall medical management, presenting risks of future deaths.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clarity about relative responsibility for patients’ overall medical management between Mayday Assistance Limited and air ambulance providers

    Wider context from the report

    “The medical management of patients once Mayday Assistance Limited has instructed an Air Ambulance provider During the course of the inquest the court heard evidence that on 24 November 2017 Mayday Assistance Limited instructed Tyrol Air Ambulance (TAA) to repatriate Mr Marshall from Nepal to the UK. The court heard that the repatriation to the UK did not ultimately go ahead as Mr Marshall was not considered fit enough to undergo the flight on the dates that TAA had an available aircraft. The court found that during the period from 24 November to 4 December 2017 there was a lack of clarity as between Mayday Assistance Limited and TAA with regards to who was responsible for Mr Marshall’s overall medical management, and as a result neither Mayday Assistance Limited nor TAA were monitoring Mr Marshall’s ongoing condition with a view to reviewing and advising on (i) whether the UK was the appropriate destination for Mr Marshall and identifying potential regional alternatives and (ii) the overall risk/benefits of him remaining in Nepal versus being transferred to another country in the region. Whilst the court was not persuaded that this omission caused or contributed to the particular facts of Mr Marshall’s death, the Coroner is concerned that this lack of clarity remains today, not only as between Mayday Assistance Limited and TAA but potentially as between Mayday Assistance Limited and other air ambulance providers, which presents a risk of future death. ”

    Source location

    Sheldon Marshall · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 6 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish Air Ambulance Support Agreements with providers to clarify responsibilities and promote close working relationships on all cases.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “An Air Ambulance Support Agreement is now in place with Mayday's Air Ambulance providers, as attached, to ensure that both parties are clear regarding their responsibilities and to ensure that there is a close working relationship on all cases. If a company declines to sign our agreement and cannot provide one with similar protocols they will be removed from Mayday's provider list.”

    Source location

    2021-0276-Response-from-Mayday-Group-Ltd_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 August 2021

    Open published response
  6. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Martin Gibbons · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Martin Gibbons attempted to take his own life on 19 March 2020 and was taken to hospital, where he was assessed as needing admission to a psychiatric ward. While waiting for a bed, he left the hospital unobserved and was found dead on 24 March 2020; the inquest concluded suicide. Concerns included differing assessments of risk between acute and mental health trusts, the absence of shared risk assessments and care plans, and delays in obtaining a mental health bed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide detailed and documented shared risk assessments and care plans in acute settings

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The inquest heard evidence that since Mr Gibbon’s death both trusts had recognised that to reduce risk there needed to be detailed and documented shared risk assessments and care plans for patients such as him in an acute setting. The inquest heard that there was no national or regional guidance in place in relation to this shared care plan approach. ”

    Source location

    Martin Gibbons · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Design and implement integrated care pathways linking liaison psychiatry teams with community mental-health services, including timely information sharing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All acute hospitals now have an adult liaison service in place, with 78 per cent of these services operating 24 hours a day, 7 days-a-week, which is an increase from 39 per cent in 2017, and this expansion is continuing through the NHS Long Term Plan. NHSE/I is working with local areas to design and implement care pathways that are integrated with the wider health and social care system, including timely sharing of information between liaison psychiatry teams and community mental health services.”

    Source location

    2021-0166-Response-from-Department-of-Health-Social-Care_Published.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use joint assessment, handover and working-plan documentation to record risk, observation levels, clinical plans and handovers between liaison and emergency-department teams.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• On assessment by the LMHT, the risk assessment is reviewed alongside a suicide risk screen being completed. The practitioner is then asked to rate the level of risk again using the same levels described above and agree an observation level for the patient. This joint working document then details the outcome of the assessment and the plan for the patient (inclusive of plan should they be waiting for a bed in the ED) which is agreed and signed by the LMHT practitioner and the ED team leader. This evidences the handover and working plan for the patient. Additionally, both teams have a handover sheet in use. PCFT’s handover sheet requests the name of the ED practitioner that a handover has been given to.”

    Source location

    2021-0166-Response-from-GMCA_Published.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Embed a standard operating procedure across both organisations reflecting shared-care principles.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As an outcome of the investigation both trusts recognised the need to develop shared care principles and an agreed risk stratification/triage tool, including actions required should a person present to the emergency department (ED) who is considered a high risk to themselves. This document also needed to specify who is responsible for caring for the patient at given times when in the ED and include”

    Source location

    2021-0166-Response-from-GMCA_Published.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 24 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Local clinicians and operational managers are responsible for the safety of handover and patient management between acute and mental health services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Recently, (and in part due to concerns raised by your report) NHS England has asked all parts of the country to ensure that they have in place clear written protocols for escalation and actions to be taken when patients are waiting long periods, or a bed cannot be identified. The handover and management of a patient between services (in this case, acute and mental health services) is a local operational matter and the safety of these processes is the responsibility of the clinicians and operational managers involved in the direct care of the patient. There is a significant body of guidance that emphasises the importance of sharing patient information (which includes assessments and care plans) between clinical teams for the purposes of direct clinical care. National guidance³ on care for people with mental health needs in emergency departments has been published by NHS England.”

    Source location

    2021-0166-Response-from-Department-of-Health-Social-Care_Published.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 May 2021

    Open published response
  7. Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Elena WELLS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Elena Wells, who had a history of mental health issues, died after placing a ligature around her neck while alone at home awaiting an urgent mental health admission. The report identified unclear responsibility and communication between the Local Authority and Mental Health Trust, and insufficient out-of-hours support and supervision while she waited for a bed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clear allocation of overall responsibility for care

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Both the Local Authority and the Trust were involved in the care of Miss Wells for the last 24 hours of her life. Evidence showed that there was a grey area in respect of responsibility for her care, at this time. There was no clear guidance as to who held overall responsibility for her care and there was no clear policy of how the two organisations should work together in these kinds of situations. It is requested that the Local Authority and the Trust consider how to improve communication and clearly define responsibility between the two organisations which could improve the safety of patients with serious mental health difficulties who were waiting for urgent admission to a mental health unit. ”

    Source location

    Elena WELLS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a clear inter-organisational working policy

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Both the Local Authority and the Trust were involved in the care of Miss Wells for the last 24 hours of her life. Evidence showed that there was a grey area in respect of responsibility for her care, at this time. There was no clear guidance as to who held overall responsibility for her care and there was no clear policy of how the two organisations should work together in these kinds of situations. It is requested that the Local Authority and the Trust consider how to improve communication and clearly define responsibility between the two organisations which could improve the safety of patients with serious mental health difficulties who were waiting for urgent admission to a mental health unit. ”

    Source location

    Elena WELLS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Finalise the Trust-wide CRHT operational policy, including referral pathways and defined responsibilities for services supporting patients awaiting admission.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response, the Trust is in the process of developing a new Crisis Resolution Home Treatment Team (CRHT) Operational Policy. An interim policy was presented to the Operational Management Board in December 2020 and it was agreed the CRHT teams would work to this whilst the policy is further developed by the newly appointed Trust wide Urgent Care Pathway Lead.”

    Source location

    2020-0248-Responses-from-Sussex-Partnership-Foundation-NHS-Trust-and-Brighton-Hove-City-Council-Redacted..pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 December 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Run a daily Urgent Demand Oversight meeting to review admission demand, available resources and support packages for patients awaiting hospital care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Locally, the Care Delivery Services [CDS] in Brighton has established an Urgent Demand Oversight meeting that enables the CDS Leads to have daily oversight of our patients requiring admission to hospital. This meeting is informed by the various Operational meetings that take place daily in our Community, Urgent and Acute Care Services and is described in the enclosed Terms of Reference (appendix 1).”

    Source location

    2020-0248-Responses-from-Sussex-Partnership-Foundation-NHS-Trust-and-Brighton-Hove-City-Council-Redacted..pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 December 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Finalise a Brighton and Hove flowchart and local protocol clarifying how AMHPs secure care or treatment while patients await admission.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Productive discussions have taken place between the local authority and SPFT staff to identify what policies, practice guidance and communications need to be produced or amended to clarify professional roles within the mental health legal framework. It is agreed that a simple Brighton and Hove flowchart describing how an AMHP can ensure a patient post-assessment receives necessary care or treatment without delay regardless of bed availability is essential. A draft flowchart has already been produced. There is also a need for AMHPs to be accepted as Trusted Assessors which would enable more efficient and faster referrals into SPFT services.”

    Source location

    2020-0248-Responses-from-Sussex-Partnership-Foundation-NHS-Trust-and-Brighton-Hove-City-Council-Redacted..pdf
    Page 10 · response
    Published 29 December 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing urgent demand meetings, Haven availability and agreed AMHP operational arrangements are considered sufficient to prevent the identified confusion recurring meanwhile.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Based on the positive working relationship that exists between the local authority and the SPFT, I am confident that we can achieve the clarity needed for our respective staff to be able to operate in an appropriate manner to ensure patient safety. This task is being prioritised within the local authority and we have agreed with the SPFT that the flowchart should be finalised by the end of March 2021 confirming a local protocol between our organisations. In the interim the measures that have been put in place already by SPFT eg. the introduction of a daily Urgent Demand and Capacity meeting conducted by the Care Delivery Service, the availability of the local Haven@Millview hospital and the agreement of operational management of the role of an AMHP, assure me that this confusion that was evident with some professionals involved in Miss Wells care in March 2020 should not arise again.”

    Source location

    2020-0248-Responses-from-Sussex-Partnership-Foundation-NHS-Trust-and-Brighton-Hove-City-Council-Redacted..pdf
    Page 10 · response
    Published 29 December 2020

    Open published response
  8. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Barry Wayne Preston · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Barry Wayne Preston, who lacked capacity and lived in supported accommodation, suffered a series of falls and traumatic brain injuries before developing urosepsis associated with a catheter that was not replaced within the guidance period, followed by bronchopneumonia. The report identified concerns about inaccurate documentation, unsuitable placement and wards, inadequate coordination and ownership of care, failures to hold best interests meetings, and insufficient understanding of his lack of capacity.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of care coordinators to lead support and best-interests processes in acute settings

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The inquest heard that he had a care coordinator in the community. However the care coordinator did not take a lead in ensuring he was being supported in the acute settings or that best interests meetings were taking place. There was a lack of understanding between agencies of roles and responsibilities under the integrated care model. ”

    Source location

    Barry Wayne Preston · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide assessment wards and the Emergency Department with a full Integrated Discharge Team service and assign a lead care coordinator for each patient's discharge planning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At the time of this incident the IDT did not provide a comprehensive service to inpatient assessment areas such as ward D2, operating an in-reach model which was reliant on other professionals to identify those patients who had existing social care needs prior to admission to hospital. The team has been reconfigured to ensure that patients with complex health and social needs are identified through the same multi-disciplinary team process that has been in place on base ward areas. Since May 2020, all assessment wards, as well as the Emergency Department are provided a full service and a lead care coordinator is assigned to oversee the coordination of the discharge planning process from admission to discharge.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Bolton-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide a single hospital-based care coordinator for each patient and record coordination input in electronic and social services records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The IDT has identified that the role of a seconded mental health post within the team was a key omission in the management of Mr Preston’s journey. The use of different organisation’s case recording systems also resulted in the failure to identify that the patient already had a care coordinator in the community and the needs to identify an IMCA to represent the patient’s best interest. Since this incident the IDT has in conjunction with GMMHFT, removed this role from the service in order to provide a single care coordinator (this will either be a social worker or discharge nurse) for each patient who is hospital based and will liaise with other organisations where needed. All input will be recorded in the patient’s electronic patient record and social services case recording systems.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Bolton-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use the care coordinator as the single mental health contact for hospital admissions and require re-entry into hospital care to maintain communication and consistency.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A review of the mental health practitioner role within the Integrated Discharge Team had commenced prior to the death of Mr Preston, however following a subsequent review with the Local Authority and Bolton Foundation Trust, taking into consideration the concerns noted within the inquest, the decision has been taken to end the secondment of the mental health social worker and return the practitioner to their substantive post within Greater Manchester Mental Health. Going forward there is now one point of contact with mental health services, the care coordinator, who will on re-arch into the hospital when any service user they are involved with is admitted, to provide consistency and ensure hospital staff are aware of any input from mental health services.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Mental-Health-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Advise care coordinators to proactively contact acute trusts and coordinate care when service users move between wards, hospitals or care settings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Care coordinators have been advised that as part of their role, they are expected to proactively in-reach into acute trusts, to ensure effective communication is facilitated, to mitigate risks of individuals being moved between wards / hospitals / other care settings without the care coordinator being informed; this will enable to care coordinator to appropriately coordinate care, taking into account an individual's holistic needs. (This is outlined with the Older Adult Service Operational Procedure and the Policy for the Transfer of Service Users to Acute Care).”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Mental-Health-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Communicate expectations to staff that significant changes require consideration and recording of capacity assessments and Best Interest meetings, with care-plan liaison monitored through supervision.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Team Managers have discussed the expectations with all staff, that every time there is a significant change in an individual's circumstance, that capacity assessments & Best Interest Meetings are considered and clearly recorded, and that care coordinators ensure they proactively liaise with other care providers to ensure any changes to the care plan can be reviewed and updated appropriately, and this is being monitored via supervision.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Mental-Health-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Have Team Managers proactively review cases involving admission to other care settings during supervision to check care coordination and consideration of capacity and Best Interest meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Through supervision and team meetings, all staff have been informed of the expectations of a care coordinator when patients are admitted to alternative care settings, such as acute trusts, and informed that they must consider support from advocacy / IMCA. Team Managers will proactively review cases where individuals have been admitted to other care settings in supervision to ensure that care coordinator are proactively coordinating the individuals care, and consideration has been given to Capacity and Best Interest meetings, where appropriate.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Mental-Health-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish a single care-coordinator point of contact, with care coordinators providing hospital in-reach for involved service users.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A review of the mental health practitioner role within the IDT had commenced prior to the death of Mr Preston, however following a subsequent review with the Local Authority and BNFT, taking into consideration the concerns noted within the inquest, the decision has been taken to end the secondment of the mental health social worker and return the postholder to Greater Manchester Mental Health. There is now one point of contact, which is the care coordinator, who will in-reach into the hospital when any service user they are involved with is admitted.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Bolton-Council_Redacted-1.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide the Integrated Discharge Team across all assessment wards and the Emergency Department, assigning a lead care coordinator from admission through discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At the time of this incident the IDT did not provide a comprehensive service to inpatient assessment areas such as ward D2, operating an in-reach model which was reliant on other professionals identify those patients who had existing social care needs prior to admission to hospital. The team has been reconfigured to ensure that patients with complex health and social needs are identified through the same multi-disciplinary team process that has been in place on base ward areas. Since May 2020, all assessment wards as well as the Emergency Department are provided a full service and a lead care coordinator is assigned to oversee the coordination of the discharge planning process from admission to discharge.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Bolton-Council_Redacted-1.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Bolton Council and GMMHFT will provide the full response to concerns about community care coordination and agency roles.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Section 5 (3) The inquest heard that he had a care coordinator in the community. However, the care coordinator did not take a lead in ensuring he was being supported in the acute settings or that best interest meetings were taking place. There was a lack of understanding between agencies of role and responsibilities under the integrated care model.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Bolton-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Greater Manchester Mental Health Foundation Trust addresses care coordinator responsibilities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The point regarding care coordinator responsibilities is addressed in point (4) by GMMH. However, with regard to the lack of understanding of roles and responsibilities under the integrated care model, we have made some changes following the inquest which should provide assurance.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Bolton-Council_Redacted-1.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Bolton NHS Foundation Trust, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust and Bolton Council are responsible for responding to the report’s specific concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I expect the Bolton NHS Foundation Trust, the Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust and Bolton Council to carefully consider and respond to the specific concerns highlighted by your report. I am advised that Bolton NHS Foundation Trust and Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust have apologised for the lack of co-ordination in Mr Preston’s care while he was in hospital and the failure to conduct a formal assessment of Mr Preston’s mental capacity. You will know from the responses of the NHS trusts and Bolton Council to your report that they have worked together to resolve the matters of concern highlighted, with several actions taken to improve the co-ordination and quality of care for people with physical and mental health problems. I am pleased to see that learnings are being taken from the circumstances around Mr Preston’s care.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Local authorities, service providers and the Care Quality Commission are responsible for acting on allegations of poor care, neglect or abuse.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Government is committed to preventing and reducing the risk of harm to adults in vulnerable situations. Under the Care Act 2014, we expect local authorities to ensure that the services they commission are safe, effective and of high quality. We also expect those providing the service, local authorities and the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to take swift action where anyone alleges poor care, neglect or abuse.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response
  9. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Gordon Fenton · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Gordon Fenton, a 70-year-old man detained under the Mental Health Act, developed a urinary tract infection and related complications during periods of care between psychiatric and medical services, and died in hospital on 29 June 2019 after a seizure and cardiac arrest. The principal concerns were inadequate information sharing and the lack of a formal joint decision-making process between the two NHS Trusts, with the inquest finding that this prolonged and contributed to ineffective management of his infection.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a formalised joint process for reviewing treatment plans and determining optimum medical and psychiatric care

    Wider context from the report

    “3. There does not appear to be a formalised decision-making process in place involving both Trusts to review the treatment plan to determine the optimum medical and psychiatric care to suit the particular patient’s needs. ”

    Source location

    Gordon Fenton · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of effective coordination of shared psychiatric and acute medical care

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The inquest heard that there was a particular tension in relation to shared care between Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust and Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Trust for patients who are subject to psychiatric care, who have acute medical problems. ”

    Source location

    Gordon Fenton · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate joint mental health inpatient transfer and return-transfer pathways covering physical deterioration, chronic conditions and required clinical information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A number of joint pathways have also been created with regards to Mental Health Inpatient Transfers of Care and Return Inpatient Transfers of Care. In terms of transfers of care, the process will be split into three categories;”

    Source location

    2020-0102-Response-from-Tameside-and-Glossop-Integrated-Care_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 May 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and trial a joint standard operating procedure for older mental health inpatients requiring medical input.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of our investigation into your concerns, extensive discussions have taken place between the Associate Director and Mental Health Quality Lead at PCFT, Head of Assurance & Governance for TGICFT and Lead Nurse for Mental Health & Learning Disabilities at TGICFT in relation to ongoing improvements in shared service, specifically in relation to creating a formal standard operating procedure and enhancing services we offer.”

    Source location

    2020-0102-Response-from-Tameside-and-Glossop-Integrated-Care_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 May 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide documented self-directed training on the approved joint standard operating procedure to all relevant staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Once the new SOP is approved by both Trusts, self-directed training will be carried out by all staff to which the SOP is relevant and this training documented in their training record. I understand that in the meantime PCFT are using our Digital Health Team for advice and guidance with regards to mental health patients requiring medical input.”

    Source location

    2020-0102-Response-from-Tameside-and-Glossop-Integrated-Care_Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 27 May 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the joint Standard Operating Procedure for shared physical and mental healthcare of older inpatients requiring medical input.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of our investigation into your concerns, extensive discussions have taken place between Tameside’s Associate Director and Mental Health Quality Lead at PCFT and the Head of Assurance and Governance and Lead Nurse for Mental Health and Learning Disabilities at TGICFT in relation to ongoing improvements in shared service, specifically in relation to creating a formal standard operating ████████ and enhancing services offered by TGICFT.”

    Source location

    2020-0102-Response-from-Pennine-Care-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 May 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create and apply structured pathways for acute deterioration, chronic-condition advice, information gathering, and transfers of care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A number of pathways have also been created with regards to mental health in-patient transfers of care and return in-patient transfers of care. In terms of transfers of care, the process will be split into three categories;”

    Source location

    2020-0102-Response-from-Pennine-Care-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 May 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish working parameters and pilot Digital Health Team support for physical health needs on Summers and Hague wards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This SOP will apply to all patients within PCFT’s Tameside older peoples’ mental health in-patient wards. Both organisations will continue to work in partnership to identify, agree and establish working parameters for the Digital Health Team at TGH to support the physical health needs of older people receiving mental health care and treatment on Summers and Hague wards, of which Mr Fenton was a patient. The offering of Digital Health services will be conducted as a pilot, in the first instance for eight weeks, which will then be reviewed by both organisations to establish a more formal offer and outcomes. It is hoped that, if this procedure is successful, that similar processes will be developed for all of our patients requiring shared input.”

    Source location

    2020-0102-Response-from-Pennine-Care-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 May 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish working parameters for Digital Health Team support to older mental health inpatients on Summers and Hague wards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The joint SOP which is scheduled to be trialled in August 2020 will apply to all patients within PCFT’s older peoples’ mental health inpatient wards. Both organisations will continue to work in partnership to identify, agree and establish working parameters for the Digital Health Team at TGH to support the physical health needs of older people receiving mental health care and treatment on Summers & Hague wards, of which Mr Fenton was a patient. The offering of Digital Health services will be conducted as a pilot in the first instance for 8 weeks, which will then be reviewed to establish a more formal offer and outcomes. It is hoped that if this procedure is successful that similar processes will be developed for all of our patients requiring shared input.”

    Source location

    2020-0102-Response-from-Tameside-and-Glossop-Integrated-Care_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 May 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct an eight-week Digital Health services pilot and review it to determine a more formal service offer and outcomes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The joint SOP which is scheduled to be trialled in August 2020 will apply to all patients within PCFT’s older peoples’ mental health inpatient wards. Both organisations will continue to work in partnership to identify, agree and establish working parameters for the Digital Health Team at TGH to support the physical health needs of older people receiving mental health care and treatment on Summers & Hague wards, of which Mr Fenton was a patient. The offering of Digital Health services will be conducted as a pilot in the first instance for 8 weeks, which will then be reviewed to establish a more formal offer and outcomes. It is hoped that if this procedure is successful that similar processes will be developed for all of our patients requiring shared input.”

    Source location

    2020-0102-Response-from-Tameside-and-Glossop-Integrated-Care_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 May 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver and document self-directed training for staff covered by the approved joint SOP.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Please note that this SOP remains in its implementation stages as both Trusts are working to align their own pathways with the new arrangement. It is planned that his will go live at the end of August 2020. Once the new SOP is approved by both Trusts, self-directed training will be carried out by all staff to which the SOP is relevant and this training will be documented in their training record.”

    Source location

    2020-0102-Response-from-Pennine-Care-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 27 May 2020

    Open published response
  10. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Caspian Thorn · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Caspian Thorn was born with significant brain damage after chronic placental insufficiency and died in hospital on 29 September 2018 after developing a gram-negative hospital-acquired infection and sepsis. The concerns included failure to offer induction or follow up a missed growth scan, poor communication and support for a vulnerable family, undocumented triage calls, inadequate documentation of decision-making, delayed recognition of a pathological CTG, and delayed recognition of signs of sepsis.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of communication between midwifery and social work teams

    Wider context from the report

    “1. A feature of the evidence was a lack of communication between the teams of midwives and social worker. This meant that it was not picked up that his mother had missed a key fetal growth scan and that a small baby was not monitored for the period between 10th September until his birth on 24th September. The inquest heard that contributing to this was a shortage of midwives in the enhanced midwifery team and a shortage of experienced social workers in the Local Authority at the time; ”

    Source location

    Caspian Thorn · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026