Recurring concern

Failure to reliably assure compliance with care plans

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 18 Feb 2020•Latest report 30 Aug 2024

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes dedicated processes for checking whether care plans are followed in practice, including monitoring care provision against the plan, auditing compliance, investigating whether non-compliance is isolated or common practice, and escalating or addressing identified non-compliance.

Not included

  • Excludes failures to create, review, update or coordinate a care plan where compliance with an existing plan is not the unsafe condition.
  • Excludes generic care-record, staffing, training or management deficiencies unless they directly concern assurance of compliance with a care plan.
  • Excludes the quality or appropriateness of the care plan itself where the reported failure is not whether it was followed.
  • Excludes isolated care omissions where no continuing or systemic failure to assure care-plan compliance is asserted.
Reports
7

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
7

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2020–2024

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
13

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Aden Court Care Home1
Belle Green Court1
Care Quality Commission1
Happy at Home Community Care Services Ltd.1
Heathcotes Care Limited1
Priory Group1
The New Lodge Nursing Care1
TLC Nursing and Care1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Berkshire

    AI-generated summary

    Wendy Ann AFFORD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Wendy Ann Afford was bedbound and living alone with a package of care before developing worsening pressure damage and an infected pressure ulcer. After hospital treatment and discharge to a care home, her health declined and she died on 15 November 2023. Concerns included inadequate skin-integrity risk assessment and monitoring, incomplete repositioning records, unclear compliance with care plans, insufficient management oversight, and possible inadequate staff training.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to audit records and compliance with care plans

    Wider context from the report

    “4. The management of the care company did not appear to carry out audits of records and compliance with care plans nor have any other effective means of oversight. ”

    Source location

    Wendy Ann AFFORD · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. South Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    June Peel · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    June Peel, a resident at Belle Green Court Care Home, sustained a displaced distal femur fracture that was not identified or medically assessed promptly. She underwent surgery after admission to hospital and did not recover, dying on a palliative care pathway. The principal concerns were failures to follow her care plan, record and hand over information about her knee injury, and seek timely medical attention.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of investigation into whether care-plan non-compliance is condoned or common practice

    Wider context from the report

    “3. There was a failure to follow the care plan by the healthcare assistants. There has been no investigation done to identify whether this is a condoned or common practice within the home. ”

    Source location

    June Peel · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Commence an accident and incident tracker requiring high-level analysis to identify patterns or concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. The Manager has commenced a tracker of all accidents and incidents which requires a high-level analysis to assist identifying any patterns or concerns.”

    Source location

    Response from Belle Green Court Care Home
    Page 12 · response
    Published 4 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require service-wide practice review after incidents indicating poor staff practice, with follow-up actions determined by the assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. Any incident/accident that identifies poor staff practice will lead to a review/assessment of practice across the staff group. The outcome of this assessment will determine the further action that is required; for example – refresher training, review of policies, supervisions, competency assessments.”

    Source location

    Response from Belle Green Court Care Home
    Page 12 · response
    Published 4 August 2025

    Open published response
  3. North Wales (East and Central)

    AI-generated summary

    Ann Daghlin · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ann Daghlin died in hospital on 13 February 2021 from sepsis resulting from a sacral pressure sore, with metastatic breast cancer contributing. The report states that her refusal of showering and full-body washing meant the pressure sore went unnoticed until it was identified by a carer. Concerns were raised that TLC nursing and home care lacked a formal review system and mechanisms to monitor whether care plans were being met.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of mechanisms to monitor whether care plans are being met

    Wider context from the report

    “I heard evidence that despite it being recorded and noted by carers that (notwithstanding their efforts to persuade) that there was clear deterioration in terms of the deceased refusing to shower and/or receive full body washing, that there was no formal review system in place at TLC nursing and care which would trigger a request to the local authority (or other appropriate authorities) to request a formal review of those concerns. A formal review request would then have involved a multi disciplinary meeting of various other professionals to consider risk, whether or not the care user had capacity. TLC nursing and home care have no mechanisms in place currently (or planned in the future) which properly monitor care provision to ensure that their care plan is infact being met or if it is not being met. ”

    Source location

    Ann Daghlin · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement an automated system to continuously monitor client care and wellbeing and trigger documented reviews of risk, capacity or care-plan changes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “TLC has also invested in an automated system (Bridie App) to assist with quickly triggering a review into a client’s risk and capacity or changes required in their care plan. This system is designed to identify any potential concerns about a client’s care or well-being and automatically initiate a review system.”

    Source location

    Response from TLC Homecare and Nursing Plus
    Page 2 · response
    Published 1 December 2022

    Open published response
  4. West Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    Dilys Greta Etchells · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Dilys Greta Etchells was found after an unwitnessed fall at her nursing home, later diagnosed with fractures of the left tibia and fibula, and subsequently developed pressure ulcers before dying in hospital on 2 July 2021. The report identified concerns about the absence or documentation of fall-prevention measures, delayed medical referral, inadequate care documentation, handover communications, and wound-management procedures.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of protocols to ensure compliance with care plans

    Wider context from the report

    “• To review existing practices with regard to the adequacy of note taking and to consider protocols to ensure compliance with care plans. ”

    Source location

    Dilys Greta Etchells · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train nurses and shift leaders on documentation, care plans, wound management, assessments, body maps, consent forms and hospital-return documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, I provided a training session to all the Registered General Nurses and Shift Leaders at Aden Court on 2 July 2021 (see also below). Part of the session covered expectations around documentation and specifically how staff should complete Hill Care’s standard proforma documentation including; admission documentation, care plans, initial wound assessment, body maps, consent to medical treatment form and return from hospital form. Following the session, all attendees confirmed that they were aware of and understood Hill Care’s policies and procedures in relation to documentation and that they had received training on how documentation must be completed.”

    Source location

    2021-0428-Response-from-HIll-Care-Group_Published
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 December 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit care plans and documentation regularly, provide feedback, and arrange additional training where non-compliance is identified.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Registered Manager of Aden Court undertakes regular care plan audits. If any non-compliance is highlighted as part of the audit process, feedback will be provided to staff within the flash meetings. All staff at Aden Court also have regular 1:1s with the management”

    Source location

    2021-0428-Response-from-HIll-Care-Group_Published
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 December 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement electronic care plans with review prompts and improved documentation auditing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Hill Care will be implementing e-care plans by Summer 2022. It had been planned that the move to electronic care plans would be sooner, but unfortunately this development was delayed because it was necessary to focus on the management of our response to the Covid-19 pandemic. The move towards electronic care plans will mean that there will no longer be any issues with regards to the legibility of entries. The new electronic system will also make it quicker to audit documentation, enabling any necessary action to be taken swiftly to rectify any identified non-compliance. The system will also provide staff with prompts to complete relevant care plans and in circumstances where a care plan requires review, it will not allow the user to move onto the next page unless and until that care plan has been reviewed and updated.”

    Source location

    2021-0428-Response-from-HIll-Care-Group_Published
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 December 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing protocols for wound management and required care documentation are considered sufficient, with compliance monitored through regular audits.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There are clear protocols in place within Aden Court in relation to wound management, admission documentation, care plans, initial wound assessment, body maps, consent to medical treatment form and the return from hospital form. As outlined above, I provided a training session for all the Registered General Nurses and Shift Leaders on 2 July 2021. The session covered wound management, completion of admission documentation, care plans, initial wound assessment, body maps, consent to medical treatment form and the return from hospital form to ensure that they were aware of the protocols in place within Aden Court. Compliance is monitored through an ongoing, regular and thorough audit process. I have provided more detail below.”

    Source location

    2021-0428-Response-from-HIll-Care-Group_Published
    Page 7 · response
    Published 29 December 2021

    Open published response
  5. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Rebecca Begg · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Rebecca Begg died at Heathcotes, Moorgreen, in the early hours of 15 September 2020 after a self-harm incident, and was found unresponsive despite resuscitation. The report identified concerns about monitoring compliance with care plans, the lack of robust incident reviews, untested observation-level support plans, staff involvement in care planning, and communication and escalation arrangements with the NHS trust.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to monitor compliance with care plans

    Wider context from the report

    “Failure to monitor compliance with care plans, and a lack of robust incident reviews – whilst welcome changes are planned with improved audit and monitoring, this is not yet fully implemented ”

    Source location

    Rebecca Begg · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review governance and quality-assurance procedures to audit incident reporting, review quality, care plans, and resulting changes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Full incident reviews are implemented, the Registered Manager reviews and follows up each incident and formally documents whether any action is required post incident. The Clinical team (which is made up of a Clinical Director, Head of Therapy, Mental Health Nurse and Assistant Psychologists), also have involvement in incident reviews now, and either have sessions with those involved (staff and people we support) to ensure the root cause is understood and different methods of support are offered or implemented to address any issues identified. Our internal governance and quality assurance procedures have been reviewed since the incident and the Quality Audit and the Monthly Provider visit both cover incident reporting. They also include reviewing and checking the quality of the reviews. In addition, they also check care plans and look for any changes made as a result of the incident.”

    Source location

    2021-0416-Response-from-Heathcotes-Group_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 16 December 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement individualised observation care plans defining observation levels, responsibilities, methods, escalation, reduction decisions, and supporting documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Several changes have been made in regards to compliance with care plans. An observation care plan has been formulated for each individual which includes information about that person, levels of observations they may require and why, when and who can implement the observations, how to undertake the observations and what process is followed to increase or decrease the observations. The decision to decrease observations is made by at least three members of the MDT (comprising of members of the Clinical team, Senior Operations team, the Registered Manager, Senior Compliance Managers. At least one person involved in the decision making is from the Clinical team and the”

    Source location

    2021-0416-Response-from-Heathcotes-Group_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 16 December 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss care plans through staff supervision, staff meetings, and protected care-plan workshops for necessary amendments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Care plans are discussed within staff supervisions and staff meetings, we also hold care plan workshops. These workshops give the Registered Manager and staff members protected time to review care plans and make any amendments relevant or necessary. Any new staff member that begins employment now has an extended induction period of 6 full days. New staff are not signed off as competent to support people alone until the Manager has done a complete knowledge check specifically concerning people’s care plans, needs and high risk areas. Knowledge checks around care planning and risk areas are undertaken every 8 weeks at random to ensure that staff have a good knowledge of what people’s needs are and how to support them. Observations are also undertaken to ensure that staff are supporting people the way their care plans prescribe them to.”

    Source location

    2021-0416-Response-from-Heathcotes-Group_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 December 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce extended induction, competency sign-off, recurring knowledge checks, and practice observations covering care plans, needs, and high-risk areas.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Care plans are discussed within staff supervisions and staff meetings, we also hold care plan workshops. These workshops give the Registered Manager and staff members protected time to review care plans and make any amendments relevant or necessary. Any new staff member that begins employment now has an extended induction period of 6 full days. New staff are not signed off as competent to support people alone until the Manager has done a complete knowledge check specifically concerning people’s care plans, needs and high risk areas. Knowledge checks around care planning and risk areas are undertaken every 8 weeks at random to ensure that staff have a good knowledge of what people’s needs are and how to support them. Observations are also undertaken to ensure that staff are supporting people the way their care plans prescribe them to.”

    Source location

    2021-0416-Response-from-Heathcotes-Group_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 December 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide designated handover periods for staff to read or reread care plans and address identified knowledge gaps.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Dedicated time for staff to be able to take time out to read or re-read care plans is highlighted on the handover sheet. Several periods of time are identified so that if one slot is missed the staff can pick the other ones. Care Plan Knowledge Checks are conducted frequently, and if gaps in knowledge are identified we ensure that people re-read care plans and have an understanding that we are satisfied with. Senior Management consider the outcomes of the Care Plan Knowledge Checks during quality checks to ensure that staff are implementing the appropriate care. People are discussed during staff members supervisions which enables us to further ensure that staff are supporting people correctly in accordance to their needs and the guidance provided.”

    Source location

    2021-0416-Response-from-Heathcotes-Group_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 December 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide night-shift oversight through Registered Manager practice checks and Team Leaders present on every night shift.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “consistent and safe working. The Registered Manager has spent time on night shifts with staff ensuring that they read and understand the support plans and people’s needs in the same way the day staff do. She has also worked shifts with them to observe practice and assure ourselves that they are following the guidance put into place. As previously confirmed, Team Leaders are also on every night shift to ensure further oversight.”

    Source location

    2021-0416-Response-from-Heathcotes-Group_Published
    Page 3 · response
    Published 16 December 2021

    Open published response
  6. Derby and Derbyshire

    AI-generated summary

    Shirley FROGGTT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Shirley Froggtt died on 8 November 2018 after falling from a wheelchair at a nursing home, sustaining a fractured femur followed by bronchopneumonia. The report identified that her care plan required a lap-strap, but it was not applied because a buckle was missing, and raised concerns about the nursing home’s systems for ensuring compliance with care plans, policies and protocols.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of robust systems ensuring compliance with care plans, policies and protocols

    Wider context from the report

    “On the evidence heard at inquest I was not satisfied that New Lodge Nursing Home had any robust systems in place to ensure compliance with care plans, policies and protocols. ”

    Source location

    Shirley FROGGTT · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Wayne Lee Millett · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Wayne Lee Millett, a detained patient at The Priory Hospital, Cheadle, had treatment-resistant schizophrenia treated with Clozapine and died there on 13 February 2019 after escalating abdominal symptoms, collapse and complications including pseudo-obstruction of the small bowel. The report raised concerns that the Care Plan was not followed, that the Priory’s investigation and quality-assurance processes were inadequate, and that care-plan compliance and Clozapine-related monitoring had not been sufficiently reviewed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to audit compliance with care plans

    Wider context from the report

    “3) The court heard differing evidence from staff working at The Priory Hospital, Cheadle and from the Peripatetic Director of Clinical Services as to what the organisation’s expectations were in respect of care plans, and specifically the degree of adherence which were required to them. In the light of this significant divergence of opinion, it is a matter of concern that the Priory Group has not undertaken any audit of compliance with care plans (either at The Priory Hospital, Cheadle or more generally within the organisation) as a result of Mr Millett’s death. ”

    Source location

    Wayne Lee Millett · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete the 2020 formal audit of patient care plans and analyse its results.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Please note there are systems in place which ensure that patient care plans are regularly audited. These systems include Ward Managers and the Director of Compliance at each hospital having a responsibility for undertaking regular “spot-checks” by way of completing the monthly Quality Walk Rounds during which the care records of patients are reviewed and evaluated. Our Healthcare Division Quality Team also undertakes a formal annual audit of care plans. The 2020 audit was unfortunately delayed due to the Covid-19 pandemic but was completed last month with the audit results currently being analysed.”

    Source location

    2020-0031-Response-from-Priory_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 February 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing monthly quality walk rounds and annual audits provide regular auditing of patient care plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Please note there are systems in place which ensure that patient care plans are regularly audited. These systems include Ward Managers and the Director of Compliance at each hospital having a responsibility for undertaking regular “spot-checks” by way of completing the monthly Quality Walk Rounds during which the care records of patients are reviewed and evaluated. Our Healthcare Division Quality Team also undertakes a formal annual audit of care plans. The 2020 audit was unfortunately delayed due to the Covid-19 pandemic but was completed last month with the audit results currently being analysed.”

    Source location

    2020-0031-Response-from-Priory_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 February 2020

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026