Recurring concern

Unsafe management of inpatient leave and absence

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 14 Oct 2013•Latest report 1 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes planned or unescorted leave, return from leave, failure to return and absence without leave when a dedicated leave or absence control is deficient.

Not included

  • Excludes discharge and ordinary movement within a ward.
  • Excludes generic risk assessment, communication or police escalation not directly tied to inpatient leave or absence.
Reports
55

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
119

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
134

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care8
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust6
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust5
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust4
NHS England4
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust4
Lancashire & South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust3
Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust3
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust2
Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust2
East London NHS Foundation Trust2
Metropolitan Police Service2
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust2
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust2
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust2

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Katharine Emma Corrigan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Katharine Emma Corrigan, a patient detained under the Mental Health Act, died by suicide after failing to return from unescorted leave on 22 July 2023. The report identifies concerns about failures in the management and recording of Section 17 leave, inadequate risk assessments and care planning, staffing and oversight, and failures concerning access to recognised treatment for a pre-existing hormonal imbalance.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to prevent and scrutinise access to unauthorised or rescinded Section 17 Leave

    Wider context from the report

    “5. Ms Corrigan was absent without leave on multiple occasions and this had been facilitated by staff. There was a lack of scrutiny as to how and why Ms Corrigan was able to access leave that had not been authorised under section 17 Mental Health Act and/or had been rescinded by the Responsible Clinician due to risks of self-harm. On one occasion the Family went and searched for Ms Corrigan and returned her to the ward with reported risks that she was found near to train tracks and where her mother was buried. ”

    Source location

    Katharine Emma Corrigan · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Electronic Section 17 Leave recording failing to preserve leave timings, conditions and return visibility

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Section 17 Leave forms and the process of recording of the required components for timings and conditions of such leave had been changed by the Trust in May 2023 from a paper system to electronic recording. The new system: a. omitted previously detailed information on the timings and conditions of the leave that included required scrutiny by a qualified mental health nurse. b. Staff then recorded some information on the Bed State document and evidence was this was not the purpose of this document and led to lack of visibility of any patient who had not returned at the specified time. This was not questioned or queried by senior staff. c. Senior management staff gave evidence that they were unaware of the lack of visibility of the conditions for Section 17 leave under the new electronic system of recording and had not been consulted when the changes were being made. This was still the system in place. ”

    Source location

    Katharine Emma Corrigan · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Kristian Edward Allen · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kristian Edward Allen, who had complex mental health issues and a history of drug and alcohol abuse, died at Millview Hospital on 16 February 2025 after taking heroin, cocaine and alcohol. The report identifies concerns about inappropriate authorisation of leave, inadequate searches and observations, poor communication, and a delayed and ineffective response to his cardiac arrest. The concerns also include staff being insufficiently trained to manage cardiac arrests and drug overdoses in acute mental health wards.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of nursing staff to know leave conditions

    Wider context from the report

    “I am concerned that s17 leave is being authorised by staff in ignorance of the leave conditions. In this particular case, the responsible clinician granted leave on the 13th of February 2025, a condition being that Kristian had to test negative for drug use before leave was allowed. On the 15th of February 2025, the nurse in charge granted escorted leave despite Kristian having tested positive for cocaine use. He was unaware of the restrictions on Kristian’s leave. Evidence was heard during the Inquest that this was a frequent problem and I am concerned that nursing staff are unaware of leave conditions and this is not being properly monitored. This runs a risk of future fatalities if leave is being granted inappropriately. ”

    Source location

    Kristian Edward Allen · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to properly monitor leave conditions

    Wider context from the report

    “I am concerned that s17 leave is being authorised by staff in ignorance of the leave conditions. In this particular case, the responsible clinician granted leave on the 13th of February 2025, a condition being that Kristian had to test negative for drug use before leave was allowed. On the 15th of February 2025, the nurse in charge granted escorted leave despite Kristian having tested positive for cocaine use. He was unaware of the restrictions on Kristian’s leave. Evidence was heard during the Inquest that this was a frequent problem and I am concerned that nursing staff are unaware of leave conditions and this is not being properly monitored. This runs a risk of future fatalities if leave is being granted inappropriately. ”

    Source location

    Kristian Edward Allen · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Test and retest nursing staff competency in understanding and complying with section 17 leave conditions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Authorisation of s17 leave As you heard during the Inquest, the conditions of s.17 leave are documented in a patient's electronic clinical record on the specific s.17 leave form and I understand that that was done for Kristian. However, I know that the nursing staff did not comply with the conditions despite them being clearly on Kristian's electronic record. This non-compliance was highlighted within the Trust's PSII report. I confirm, as you heard in evidence, that the Trust has already taken action to address this. Specifically, nursing staff's understanding of s.17 leave and the requirement to comply with conditions is tested though the use of competency tests. I am informed that ████████ (Clinical Director) gave evidence at the Inquest to explain that a staff member's competency is re-tested until they can satisfactorily show their depth of understanding.”

    Source location

    Response from Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 June 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor and audit compliance with section 17 leave conditions through matrons, ward managers and governance processes, with resulting actions overseen.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Additionally, compliance is now consistently monitored via matrons, ward managers and governance processes to ensure high quality s.17 leave understanding is maintained. Furthermore, as you heard, the Trust has a programme of audits which specifically include checking legal compliance with s.17 leave conditions. The audits give rise to actions which are then overseen. Also, at ward-level re-enforcement of expected standards is now done routinely through team meetings, safety discussions and MDT processes. Further, as you heard from ████████, bespoke training is being provided to staff on s.17 leave and, notably, the outcome from Kristian's Inquest will be specifically included in that training session which is schedule for next week.”

    Source location

    Response from Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 June 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce section 17 leave standards through team meetings, safety discussions and multidisciplinary team processes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Additionally, compliance is now consistently monitored via matrons, ward managers and governance processes to ensure high quality s.17 leave understanding is maintained. Furthermore, as you heard, the Trust has a programme of audits which specifically include checking legal compliance with s.17 leave conditions. The audits give rise to actions which are then overseen. Also, at ward-level re-enforcement of expected standards is now done routinely through team meetings, safety discussions and MDT processes. Further, as you heard from ████████, bespoke training is being provided to staff on s.17 leave and, notably, the outcome from Kristian's Inquest will be specifically included in that training session which is schedule for next week.”

    Source location

    Response from Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 June 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide bespoke section 17 leave training, including learning from Kristian Allen’s inquest.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Additionally, compliance is now consistently monitored via matrons, ward managers and governance processes to ensure high quality s.17 leave understanding is maintained. Furthermore, as you heard, the Trust has a programme of audits which specifically include checking legal compliance with s.17 leave conditions. The audits give rise to actions which are then overseen. Also, at ward-level re-enforcement of expected standards is now done routinely through team meetings, safety discussions and MDT processes. Further, as you heard from ████████, bespoke training is being provided to staff on s.17 leave and, notably, the outcome from Kristian's Inquest will be specifically included in that training session which is schedule for next week.”

    Source location

    Response from Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 June 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing Trust actions embedded in policy, training, governance and ward-level processes are considered sufficient; no further new actions are needed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In summary, given the comprehensive range of actions already taken by the Trust there are no further new actions that I consider the Trust needs to take. That said, as I recognised above, all improvement requires sustained, committed focus. So, whilst I can already say that the actions described above are now embedded within policy, training, governance and ward-level quality improvement processes, which are subject to ongoing monitoring to ensure improvements continue, I would like to assure you that the oversight and focus on”

    Source location

    Response from Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 22 June 2026

    Open published response
  3. Kent and Medway

    AI-generated summary

    Catherine Mary MORGAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Catherine Mary Morgan, who was receiving mental health care, left hospital on unescorted leave and was later located near Dover Castle. She jumped to her death at 20.16 on 4 September 2024. Concerns included delays in the police response to reports that she was missing, and inadequate systems for assessing, authorising, communicating and monitoring voluntary patients’ leave.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate monitoring and escalation of patients on leave who do not return

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The system for monitoring leave was inadequate, reliance being placed on hourly checks. The nurse conducting the hourly check at 12.00 when Catherine was due to return was not aware that she was on unescorted leave and did not escalate the matter to the nurse in charge with the result that the ward only became aware that she had not returned when her mother arrived at 12.50. Consideration was not given to the appropriate amount of leeway to be given to the patient before escalating the fact of them not having returned, with patients being given 30 minutes or more; ”

    Source location

    Catherine Mary MORGAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 5 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to conduct leave risk assessments consistently with NICE Guidelines

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Evidence was given at the inquest that although dynamic risk assessments were undertaken in advance of leave being authorised, risk assessments were not consistent with NICE Guidelines; ”

    Source location

    Catherine Mary MORGAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 5 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate communication and recording of leave decisions

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The systems in place for safeguarding voluntary patients in respect of leave and recording the decisions was inadequate and decisions were largely communicated by word of mouth which led to differences of understanding what had been agreed, the basis on which it had been agreed and by whom it was agreed. Documentation in respect of leave was incomplete and did not comply with policy. The nurse in charge was not informed of the decision for leave or the circumstances in which leave was granted; ”

    Source location

    Catherine Mary MORGAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 5 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inconsistent approach to leave and return for detained and voluntary patients

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Ward staff appeared to take a different approach to leave and return depending upon the status of the patient as a detained or voluntary patient; ”

    Source location

    Catherine Mary MORGAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 5 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a replacement electronic patient record system incorporating redesigned risk assessment, safety planning, leave documentation and monitoring capabilities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has recently completed a procurement in relation to a new Electronic Patient Record (“EPR”) system and work is underway with the appointed provider to develop a new EPR system with a plan for this to be in place by 2028.”

    Source location

    Response from South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 28 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and update the leave, informal-patient leave, and absent-or-missing-person policies to align practice, NICE guidance and legal requirements, including photographs and voluntary-patient checklists.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust continues to evaluate its transition towards a personalised approach to risk assessment and suicide prevention. In respect of the Inquest process, it was identified there is still some work to be done with respect to aligning all other policies with the transformed Clinical Risk Assessment and Management of Harm policy. In particular, there are aspects within the AWOL, Absent and Missing Persons policy which retain “old” low/medium/high classifications, i.e. the checklist used to guide decision making where a patient is identified as AWOL. This policy has now been marked as under review as was previously indicated in the Trust’s evidence in this case.”

    Source location

    Response from South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 28 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Replace paper hourly observation checks with electronic well-being checks linked to leave monitoring and audit processes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since the incident, the hourly observation checks (which were completed incorrectly for Catherine at 12pm on 4 September 2024) have also been made electronic as part of the Trust’s work in respect of its new Enhanced Care policy. The introduction of the checks (now known as ‘well-being checks’) in an electronic form (Appendix C) will make it easier for them to be cross referenced with the Leave Log to assist with monitoring patients on leave. It will also make it easier to audit the checks to ensure they have been correctly completed by staff.”

    Source location

    Response from South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 28 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Investigate and explore producing the leave form electronically, including with the new EPR provider, to improve access, recording and monitoring.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The Trust is currently investigating options for producing the Leave Form electronically potentially within the Trust’s “Enhanced Care on E-Obs” system, which is an electronic platform integrated with ePJS to enable recording wellbeing checks. Enhanced Care on eObs is a secure digital system that helps hospital staff record wellbeing checks and engagement during periods of enhanced care.”

    Source location

    Response from South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 28 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce and maintain a ward whiteboard recording patient leave and expected return times.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the meantime, additional measures are in place on the ward to which Ms Morgan was admitted where they have now introduced a whiteboard in the main nursing office with leave and return times written on it. This means that it is now much easier for nursing staff to keep track of whether a patient has returned from leave at the expected time. The board is updated when a patient is signed out and then on their return. This aspect of learning from the incident was part of the presentation at the Patient Safety Committee so that other wards within the Trust can consider implementing the same system.”

    Source location

    Response from South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 28 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue and disseminate a Blue Light Bulletin reinforcing prompt checks and escalation when patients fail to return from leave.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The aforementioned Patient Safety article circulated to staff on 5 March 2026 reinforced the following:”

    Source location

    Response from South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 28 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Adopt a personalised, NICE- and NHSE-aligned approach to risk formulation, management planning and safety planning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “However, the Trust has now fully adopted NICE and NHSE guidance on individualised risk formulation and management planning. The Trust’s move to a personalised approach to risk has been launched in four phases:”

    Source location

    Response from South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update mandatory clinical risk training to reflect the revised risk assessment and harm management policy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has mandatory training for all clinicians on the management of Clinical Risk, which must be completed every 3 years. As part of Phase 2, this internal training was updated to include the revised Clinical Risk Assessment and Management of Harm Policy.”

    Source location

    Response from South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement electronic ward-round templates for documenting leave discussions, risk considerations, plans and actions and sharing them across multidisciplinary teams and shifts.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since Ms Morgan’s death, the Trust has made significant changes to the way in which discussion and plans from ward rounds, including in relation to patient leave, are noted within EPJS and how these are shared through EPJS template documents to assist with robust handover throughout the MDT and between shifts. There is a Ward Round template (Appendix A) which guides clinicians in noting the discussion and outcomes from ward round meetings. Of note, there is a specifically a space under the “Safety” tab for clinicians to record agreement and discussions around leave, however it is also anticipated that discussion and planning of leave will feature prominently in ward round discussions and to this extent they should also be reflected within the recorded considerations around risk as well as plans and actions for the patient arising from the ward round review.”

    Source location

    Response from South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 28 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish and disseminate patient-safety learning on informal leave management, documentation and failure to return to relevant staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “On the 5 March 2026 this matter, along with broader considerations regarding management of informal leave and failure to return from planned leave were addressed within a Patient Safety learning article which has been published centrally and has been disseminated by Directorate governance teams to all relevant staff. A copy of this has previously been shared with the Coroner. As a point of clarity, it is not Trust policy (and it would also be contrary to the legal framework) to mandate time limits for informal leave given the legal right of informal patients to take time off the ward as they choose.”

    Source location

    Response from South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 28 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a standardised leave log suitable for detained and informal patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The Ward Risk Assessment for Section 17/Informal Leave form that was in use when Ms Morgan was a patient on the ward was not included in any Trust policy but was produced by the ward by combining the Section 17 leave risk assessment checklist and the Daily Leave Log to produce a new form. Because of the reference to section 17 leave it was not felt that this was appropriate to both detained and informal patients and thus a new standardised Leave Log has been developed that is appropriate to both detained and informal patients (Appendix D). With respect to the Section 17 leave risk assessment checklist, it has been identified that this is not in accordance with NICE guidance 2022 which does not recommend the use of risk assessment tools to predict the risk of suicide or to decide which patients receive treatment or are discharged.”

    Source location

    Response from South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 28 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust cannot mandate time limits for informal leave because doing so would be contrary to the legal framework governing informal patients’ leave.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “On the 5 March 2026 this matter, along with broader considerations regarding management of informal leave and failure to return from planned leave were addressed within a Patient Safety learning article which has been published centrally and has been disseminated by Directorate governance teams to all relevant staff. A copy of this has previously been shared with the Coroner. As a point of clarity, it is not Trust policy (and it would also be contrary to the legal framework) to mandate time limits for informal leave given the legal right of informal patients to take time off the ward as they choose.”

    Source location

    Response from South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 28 July 2026

    Open published response
  4. South Yorkshire (Eastern)

    AI-generated summary

    Delwyn PREECE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Delwyn Preece, a 64-year-old man, died at Rotherham Hospital on 19 August 2025 from a hypoxic brain injury following deliberate self-suspension by ligature while he was an informal patient at an acute mental health hospital. The principal concerns were repeated granting of leave without documented mental state examinations or risk assessments, poor and retrospective record-keeping, and shortcomings in the patient safety investigation arising from unfamiliarity with the medical records system.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to undertake and document mental state examinations and risk assessments before granting ward leave

    Wider context from the report

    “1. There were consistent and repeated incidents (13 incidents in 6 days) where leave from the ward was granted without any documented mental state examination or risk assessment being undertaken prior to the patient being permitted to leave the ward. ”

    Source location

    Delwyn PREECE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Cheshire

    AI-generated summary

    Ruariri Thomas STEWART · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ruariri Thomas Stewart, aged 29, died from fatal cocaine toxicity at Weaver Lodge Independent Hospital on 31 July 2025 after a period of unescorted leave during which he probably obtained cocaine. The report identifies concerns about failures in documentation, communication, information sharing, leave decision-making, substance-misuse management, record keeping, and the quality of post-incident investigation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to fully consider recent substance misuse history in unescorted-leave decisions

    Wider context from the report

    “7. Decisions were made to grant unescorted leave to a patient with a known and recent history of cocaine use whilst on unescorted leave, without a full appreciation of their recent substance misuse history ”

    Source location

    Ruariri Thomas STEWART · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to document and formalise leave reinstatement decisions

    Wider context from the report

    “4. When the responsible clinician was away for an extended period, leave was managed by a non s12 doctor. There is no contemporaneous documentary evidence of the decision making process by that doctor to reinstate leave as decisions were made outside the formal s17 MHA framework. ”

    Source location

    Ruariri Thomas STEWART · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Leave management by a non-s12 doctor during responsible-clinician absence

    Wider context from the report

    “4. When the responsible clinician was away for an extended period, leave was managed by a non s12 doctor. There is no contemporaneous documentary evidence of the decision making process by that doctor to reinstate leave as decisions were made outside the formal s17 MHA framework. ”

    Source location

    Ruariri Thomas STEWART · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reissue section 17 guidance and use separate escorted/emergency and unescorted leave forms for each patient.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Specifically in respect of s.17 MHA decision-making, AFG has updated and reissued to staff guidance as to the process to be followed. In addition, AFG has moved to a system of two leave forms for each patient: one that covers all escorted and emergency arrangements; and a second which covers unescorted leave, to minimise the impact to restriction and recovery.”

    Source location

    Response from Alternative Futures Group
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise MDT documentation to include a current risk summary and the patient’s perspective, informed by review of patient documentation and interactions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• MDT documentation has been revised and updated to require inclusion of a clear and current risk summary, and staff have been reminded to consider all the patient’s documentation including interactions with the patient. The patient’s perspective is included as part of the MDT preparation documents.”

    Source location

    Response from Alternative Futures Group
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Document all clinical and Mental Health Act decisions in patient files, the DSR system and relevant meeting minutes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• All clinical decision-making, including that relating to MHA matters, is now documented within each patients’ file, both within the DSR system as well as additionally in any relevant minutes – for example within MDT meeting minutes, where a clinical decision has been taken during the course of that meeting.”

    Source location

    Response from Alternative Futures Group
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 March 2026

    Open published response
  6. County Durham and Darlington

    AI-generated summary

    Hilary Jane CHAPMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Hilary Jane Chapman, who was detained under section 3 at Lanchester Road Hospital, left on unescorted leave and was later found unconscious in her car after a suspected overdose. She suffered cardiac arrest and hypoxic brain injury, received palliative care, and died at St Cuthbert’s Hospice on 11 March 2025. The principal concern was that the Trust’s updated section 17 leave processes were not reflected in its overarching policy, including issues concerning communication of leave arrangements to relevant people.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of the section 17 leave policy to reference the new leave processes

    Wider context from the report

    “Tees, Esk and Wear Valley NHS Foundation Trust ("the Trust") gave evidence of policy changes to the way in which section 17 leave was prescribed and also how families were informed and updated of such prescribed leave. The Trust explained the new processes as involving the discussion and agreement of a "Leave Plan" based on the completion of a "Leave Discussion Form" which documents the discussions which have taken place and the terms and conditions of any prescribe leave, with the "Leave Plan" being shared with any person involved in the patient's supervision whilst on leave. Whilst improvements by the Trust to the way in which section 17 leave is discussed, prescribed and agreed are acknowledged and welcomed and whilst I acknowledge what I was told about staff training having been undertaken in respect of the new processes, I was concerned that the overarching and updated section 17 leave policy makes no reference to these new processes. I was told that a review of the policy was contemplated although not likely before September 2026. I am concerned at this evidenced gap in Trust policy. ”

    Source location

    Hilary Jane CHAPMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Amend the Section 17 leave policy to direct staff to PIPA procedures, leave-risk documentation and electronic-care-record leave-plan procedures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to address these identified changes, as of April 3rd 2026 we have amended the Section 17 policy to direct staff to PIPA (Purposeful In - Patient Admission) procedures and standard processes. This directs adult acute admission ward staff to the relevant documentation required to ensure the above. This includes the,”

    Source location

    2026-0111 - Response from Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct a full stakeholder review of the Section 17 Leave Policy, including people with lived experience and carers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “On receipt of the PFD, the Trust's Chief Nurse and Medical Director commissioned a working group consisting of; the Trust's Care Group Director of Nursing, Deputy Care Group Director of Nursing, Associate Medical Director, Associate Director of Nursing for Urgent Care and the Deputy Head of Mental Health Legislation, to review the current Section17 Leave Policy in relation to the specific concerns that were raised. A full review of the Section17 Leave Policy is planned for early June 2026 which will involve all stakeholders, including those with lived experience of receiving services and of caring for those who receive services.”

    Source location

    2026-0111 - Response from Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 March 2026

    Open published response
  7. Inner West London

    AI-generated summary

    Gareth Ian JACKSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Gareth Ian JACKSON, who was at high risk of suicide and a voluntary patient in an acute psychiatric ward, was permitted unescorted leave despite a plan requiring escorted leave. He left the hospital and was struck by a train, dying from multiple traumatic injuries on 22 June 2022. The principal concerns were failures to communicate, document and follow his leave-safety plan, inadequate risk assessment, unaligned policies, and insufficient controls over access to the route out of the hospital.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to align acute ward operational, leave and risk management policies

    Wider context from the report

    “I heard evidence that there had been changes to the policies and templates aimed at addressing risk around leave and safety off ward. This was still ongoing. It was accepted in evidence that the acute ward operational policy and leave policy needed to be reviewed again to make sure the various policies including risk management policies were aligned. For example on the Day 2 checklist for review there was no placeholder for leave/off ward safety management. I was told that there was a positive move to review thinking around risk more as safety rather than simply as risk management, but this was a new concept. I noted that in the templates now used to consider nursing reviews and handovers, there was no specific place to consider leave management and safety around this, expecting it instead to be addressed in the plan – albeit there was a reminder to consider this on the template. To that extent it appeared little substantial had changed from the process before, and the policies remained unaligned. I am concerned that safety planning around leave/going off ward/unit as a voluntary patient has not been given the prominence it requires, as was required in the case of Gareth where the plan for his safety off ward had not been identified by staff on Ward 2 effectively. As such my concern as to future death if this were not to be unaddressed comprehensively, continues. ”

    Source location

    Gareth Ian JACKSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to give leave and off-ward safety planning sufficient prominence in review, handover and planning templates

    Wider context from the report

    “I heard evidence that there had been changes to the policies and templates aimed at addressing risk around leave and safety off ward. This was still ongoing. It was accepted in evidence that the acute ward operational policy and leave policy needed to be reviewed again to make sure the various policies including risk management policies were aligned. For example on the Day 2 checklist for review there was no placeholder for leave/off ward safety management. I was told that there was a positive move to review thinking around risk more as safety rather than simply as risk management, but this was a new concept. I noted that in the templates now used to consider nursing reviews and handovers, there was no specific place to consider leave management and safety around this, expecting it instead to be addressed in the plan – albeit there was a reminder to consider this on the template. To that extent it appeared little substantial had changed from the process before, and the policies remained unaligned. I am concerned that safety planning around leave/going off ward/unit as a voluntary patient has not been given the prominence it requires, as was required in the case of Gareth where the plan for his safety off ward had not been identified by staff on Ward 2 effectively. As such my concern as to future death if this were not to be unaddressed comprehensively, continues. ”

    Source location

    Gareth Ian JACKSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise the Trust Leave Policy to strengthen leave risk assessment, multidisciplinary collaboration, safety planning and holding-power guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Revised Trust Leave Policy – Strengthened requirements for risk assessment, MDT collaboration, safety planning, and explicit guidance on holding powers for informal patients. This revision was approved by our Mental Health Law Group on 23 September 2025.”

    Source location

    Response from South West London and St Georges Mental Health NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add leave procedures, safety-planning, escalation and documentation requirements to the Adult Inpatient Operational Policy and admission checklist, aligned with related policies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Enhanced Adult Inpatient Operational Policy – A new dedicated section on Leave has been added to provide clarity for our staff, covering:”

    Source location

    Response from South West London and St Georges Mental Health NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce risk-assessment processes for informal patient leave.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At the request, our Clinical Director for Acute and Urgent Care, Dr Razvan Gutu, described a number of immediate improvements that had already been made in response to this case. These included:”

    Source location

    Response from South West London and St Georges Mental Health NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish an inpatient-rotation induction programme covering risk assessment and documentation for junior doctors.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “▪ Established a new inpatient-rotation induction programme for junior doctors covering requirements for risk assessment and documentation, especially for informal patients granted leave.”

    Source location

    Response from South West London and St Georges Mental Health NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update multidisciplinary, nursing handover and care-plan review templates with dedicated leave safety-plan sections.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Updated Handover and Review Templates – The MDT and Nursing Handover templates, as well as the Care Plan Review Meeting (CPRM) template, have been updated to include a dedicated section for reviewing safety plans linked to leave. A new heading, “Safety Plan for Using Leave,” has been added to all of the above templates.”

    Source location

    Response from South West London and St Georges Mental Health NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update Collaborative Clinical Safety Training to cover leave safety planning, risk assessment and the legal framework for informal patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Training – The Collaborative Clinical Safety Training (CCST) has been updated to incorporate learning and reflections from this case, with emphasis on leave safety planning, risk assessment and the legal framework around informal patients.”

    Source location

    Response from South West London and St Georges Mental Health NHS Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 13 August 2025

    Open published response
  8. South London

    AI-generated summary

    Christopher McDonald · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Christopher McDonald, who had been detained under section 3 of the Mental Health Act and was receiving care at Bethlem Royal Hospital, died by strangulation by a ligature he had applied around his neck. Concerns included shortcomings in the individualised assessment and management of his leave after he went AWOL, failure to follow the AWOL policy, inadequate review of observation levels, and avoidable delay in identifying the ligature and communicating his relevant medical history to ambulance staff.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to individually assess whether to suspend section 17 leave when a patient goes AWOL

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence heard at the inquest demonstrated that staff working on the NPU did not have knowledge or a clear understanding of the “AWOL - Missing & Absent Persons Policy” of South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (“SLAM”) Specifically: (1) Whilst there should be an individualised assessment of whether it is appropriate to suspend section 17 when a patient goes AWOL: (a) one member of staff at the inquest gave evidence that it was “standard practice” and “protocol” that leave would be suspended; and (b) there was no evidence of any individualised assessment in Mr McDonald’s case. (2) The policy provides that SLAM staff should always accompany the police if the patient is to be returned from their home. This was not done in this case, and there was no evidence that any member of NPU staff considered this once Mr McDonald was located at his mother’s address on 24 February 2023. (3) The policy provides that if the police are likely to be involved in returning the patient to hospital then an action plan – jointly drafted between the police and Trust staff - needs to be drawn up. This was not done in this case, and there was no evidence that this was considered or completed by SLAM staff. ”

    Source location

    Christopher McDonald · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Mandate MDT risk assessment after every AWOL incident and prompt Responsible Clinician review of leave status.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Action:”

    Source location

    Response from South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 11 April 2025

    Open published response
  9. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Warren James Green · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Warren James Green, who was receiving care in an acute hospital following a serious attempt on his life, died on 20 August 2024 after jumping through a gap in a four-storey stairwell and sustaining a skull fracture and traumatic subdural haemorrhage. The concerns identified included delays in securing a psychiatric bed, inadequate supervision and safeguarding for a patient at high risk of self-harm, patients being able to leave the acute ward without appropriate assessment or staff awareness, and unclear escalation to consultant psychiatric oversight.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete appropriate risk assessments before high-risk patients leave the acute ward

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The evidence identified a risk of patients at high risk of self-harm being able to leave the acute ward without appropriate risk assessment (2) The evidence identified a risk of patients at high risk of self-harm being able to leave the acute ward without the knowledge of the hospital staff The above shows a lacuna in terms of patients’ safety and safeguarding. (3) The evidence showed that the Mental Health Liaison Service relies on nurses to conduct initial assessments and follow up reviews of patients suffering with mental health issues and the mechanism by which escalation to a Consultants Psychiatric is decided and the factors to be taken into account for escalation are not at all clear. This leads to lack of Consultants oversight for these vulnerable patients. ”

    Source location

    Mr Warren James Green · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure hospital staff know when high-risk patients leave the acute ward

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The evidence identified a risk of patients at high risk of self-harm being able to leave the acute ward without appropriate risk assessment (2) The evidence identified a risk of patients at high risk of self-harm being able to leave the acute ward without the knowledge of the hospital staff The above shows a lacuna in terms of patients’ safety and safeguarding. (3) The evidence showed that the Mental Health Liaison Service relies on nurses to conduct initial assessments and follow up reviews of patients suffering with mental health issues and the mechanism by which escalation to a Consultants Psychiatric is decided and the factors to be taken into account for escalation are not at all clear. This leads to lack of Consultants oversight for these vulnerable patients. ”

    Source location

    Mr Warren James Green · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and update policies and flowcharts guiding risk assessment and supervision of inpatients at high risk of self-harm.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Response: The Trust has reviewed an updated relevant policies and flowcharts to assist clinical staff with guidance and processes when managing high risk of self-harm patients in an inpatient setting, to ensure the appropriate risk assessments and supervision are put in place to maintain their safety and minimise their ability to leave a ward without staff knowledge or appropriate supervision.”

    Source location

    Response from Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Include Section 5(2) Mental Health Act guidance in the Trust’s Mental Health policy for high-risk patients attempting or intending to leave the ward.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Mental Health Policy I am also including a copy of the staff guidance regarding Section 5(2) Mental Health Act which has now been included in the Trust’s Mental Health policy. This legal framework is an option for ward clinicians to use in situations where a patient has been assessed as high risk and attempts to leave the ward, or voices intent to leave the ward.”

    Source location

    Response from Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Raise awareness of the updated Section 5(2) guidance through the Nurses’ Grand Rounds programme.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I can confirm the Trust’s Mental Health Lead and Prevent Lead Nurse is undertaking a programme to raise awareness of this updated staff guidance at the Nurses' Grand Rounds. A training session is also delivered every 6 months to the FY2 doctors as part of their induction, in which this topic around Section 5(2) assessment of the Mental Health Act is covered. In addition, this has now been added into the Trust’s Mental Health Act training that is delivered each month online.”

    Source location

    Response from Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver Section 5(2) Mental Health Act training to FY2 doctors every six months during induction.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I can confirm the Trust’s Mental Health Lead and Prevent Lead Nurse is undertaking a programme to raise awareness of this updated staff guidance at the Nurses' Grand Rounds. A training session is also delivered every 6 months to the FY2 doctors as part of their induction, in which this topic around Section 5(2) assessment of the Mental Health Act is covered. In addition, this has now been added into the Trust’s Mental Health Act training that is delivered each month online.”

    Source location

    Response from Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add Section 5(2) Mental Health Act assessment to the Trust’s monthly online Mental Health Act training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I can confirm the Trust’s Mental Health Lead and Prevent Lead Nurse is undertaking a programme to raise awareness of this updated staff guidance at the Nurses' Grand Rounds. A training session is also delivered every 6 months to the FY2 doctors as part of their induction, in which this topic around Section 5(2) assessment of the Mental Health Act is covered. In addition, this has now been added into the Trust’s Mental Health Act training that is delivered each month online.”

    Source location

    Response from Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    MSE is responsible for responding to the risk of high-risk self-harm patients leaving the acute ward without appropriate risk assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Concern 1) The evidence identified a risk of patients at high risk of self-harm being able to leave the acute ward without appropriate risk assessment”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    MSE is responsible for responding to the risk of high-risk self-harm patients leaving the acute ward without hospital staff knowing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Concern 2) The evidence identified a risk of patients at high risk of self-harm being able to leave the acute ward without the knowledge of the hospital staff”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response
  10. Gwent

    AI-generated summary

    Huw Irwin ERASMUS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Huw Irwin Erasmus died at Aderyn Unit in Pontypool after consuming a large quantity of Yew leaves while detained under Section 3 of the Mental Health Act. Concerns were raised about the absence of documentary evidence of post-leave assessments, confusion among staff about assessment and documentation requirements, and the failure to identify and manage risks associated with ingesting Yew leaves.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to conduct and understand the requirements of post-leave assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “The expectation according to the policy and from staff who gave evidence was that Huw would be assessed following a period of leave. It was also anticipated that this assessment would on occasion include a review of whether Huw had ingested vegetation. There was no documentary evidence in the clinical records that Huw had been so assessed after a period of unescorted leave. There was also confusion amongst staff about the nature of the assessment and the level of documentation required. Ultimately, the issue was whether in fact these assessments had taken place at all. Although in the circumstances this was not a finding made by the jury, it raises the concern that a failure to understand the requirements of a post-leave assessment and suitably document the findings could result in future deaths. ”

    Source location

    Huw Irwin ERASMUS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to suitably document post-leave assessment findings

    Wider context from the report

    “The expectation according to the policy and from staff who gave evidence was that Huw would be assessed following a period of leave. It was also anticipated that this assessment would on occasion include a review of whether Huw had ingested vegetation. There was no documentary evidence in the clinical records that Huw had been so assessed after a period of unescorted leave. There was also confusion amongst staff about the nature of the assessment and the level of documentation required. Ultimately, the issue was whether in fact these assessments had taken place at all. Although in the circumstances this was not a finding made by the jury, it raises the concern that a failure to understand the requirements of a post-leave assessment and suitably document the findings could result in future deaths. ”

    Source location

    Huw Irwin ERASMUS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a revised leave policy addressing risk assessment, documentation, post-leave feedback, and distinct Ground Leave and Section 17 processes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Elysium Healthcare’s Leave (including Section 17) Policy, to which reference was made at the inquest, is that which was current in November 2022. Even before the inquest, Elysium Healthcare had been reviewing this policy and I would like to reassure you that the issues you have raised will be incorporated into this review. The new policy will meet the operational needs of all our units (currently we have over 90). We are looking at a range of issues around leave generally, including issues of risk assessment, documentation and post-leave feedback. The new policy will be adopted and rolled out across all our units.”

    Source location

    Response from Elysium Healthcare
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Adopt and roll out the revised leave policy across all units.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Elysium Healthcare’s Leave (including Section 17) Policy, to which reference was made at the inquest, is that which was current in November 2022. Even before the inquest, Elysium Healthcare had been reviewing this policy and I would like to reassure you that the issues you have raised will be incorporated into this review. The new policy will meet the operational needs of all our units (currently we have over 90). We are looking at a range of issues around leave generally, including issues of risk assessment, documentation and post-leave feedback. The new policy will be adopted and rolled out across all our units.”

    Source location

    Response from Elysium Healthcare
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit a weekly sample of patient records to verify that Ground Leave records are completed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the interim, whilst the new policy is being developed, we have implemented the following changes in respect of Ground Leave at Aderyn:”

    Source location

    Response from Elysium Healthcare
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind ward staff to document Ground Leave issues and feedback on specific leave conditions in patient records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the interim, whilst the new policy is being developed, we have implemented the following changes in respect of Ground Leave at Aderyn:”

    Source location

    Response from Elysium Healthcare
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The patient’s leave assessments had taken place, including assessment in multidisciplinary and other staff meetings and documented Ground Leave episodes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Finally, you have raised the issue as to “whether in fact these assessments had taken place at all”. As others may have sight of this response, it is therefore right that I cite the oral evidence that I understand was given at the inquest both by the patient’s Responsible Clinician, Dr Jones, and the Ward Manager, which confirmed that the patient’s Leave was indeed assessed in MDT and other staff meetings. As a result, the patient had had some 84 episodes of Leave at Aderyn without any issues arising in relation to the ingestion of vegetation. This included five episodes of unescorted Ground Leave, which were all the subject of an entry in carenotes providing a comment on the utilisation of that Leave.”

    Source location

    Response from Elysium Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 February 2025

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026