Recurring concern

Failure to reliably communicate with and listen to families of mental health patients

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 11 Jul 2017•Latest report 12 Jan 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures by mental-health assessment, treatment or related care services to contact, receive, listen to, understand or meaningfully consider safety-relevant information and concerns from a patient's family or friends, including failures to provide an accessible route for families to communicate concerns.

Not included

  • Excludes family or carer involvement in care planning, discharge or treatment decisions when the specific concern is participation in the decision process rather than communication and listening about the patient's safety; that narrower concern has its own parent.
  • Excludes generic patient, family or inter-agency communication failures without a mental-health-care context.
  • Excludes failures to act on family information after it was reliably received and understood when the communication and listening process itself was adequate.
  • Excludes ordinary complaints or dissatisfaction without safety-relevant information about the patient's mental health, risks, deterioration or care.
  • Excludes communication with patients, professionals or agencies where family or friends are not the relevant source or recipient.
Reports
11

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
11

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2017–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
27

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust3
Department of Health and Social Care2
NHS England2
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust1
HCRG Care Services Ltd1
HM Prison and Probation Service1
Legal Services Lincolnshire1
Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust1
Livewell Southwest1
LPFT Legal Services1
Ministry of Justice1
NHS Hampshire and Isle of Wight Integrated Care Board1
NHS South Yorkshire Integrated Care Board1
North East London NHS Foundation Trust1
Recipient name withheld1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Leicester City and South Leicestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Margery Annie Astill · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Margery Annie Astill was admitted to the Evington Centre under Section 2 of the Mental Health Act. On 2 September 2016, she collided with another agitated patient, fell, and was diagnosed with unsurvivable head injuries; she died three days later. Concerns included ineffective referral and incident-reporting systems, inadequate communication with family members, and delays in providing first aid after falls. The inquest also found that there was no care plan, the ward was understaffed, and not all patient observations were completed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate and inaccurate communication with families of patients with mental health issues

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Communication with family members was inadequate and inaccurate, the “named nurse” system was ineffective and therefore opportunities were lost to share information and to keep the family informed and involved. The failure of the Trust to engage with family members of patients with mental health issues have been raised in the past as a concern, and contrary to NICE Guidelines. ”

    Source location

    Margery Annie Astill · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver bespoke communication-skills training to nurses involved in the incidents.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust acknowledges that the communication shared with the family following both the incidents was not an accurate description of the events which was later revealed in the CCTV footage. When the staff involved in the incidents provided Mrs Astill’s family with information regarding her falls, their form of communication did not convey the accuracy of the situation. In order to enhance the nursing staff with their communication skills, the nurses involved have subsequently attended a bespoke training course delivered by LOROS (Leicester Hospice Charity). This training course supports enhanced communication skills needed to support patients and relatives.”

    Source location

    2017-0440-Leicestershire-Partnership-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 July 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish the updated named-nurse information leaflet and checklist supporting accountability and timely communication with relatives and carers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The service has approved the updated named nurse role and responsibility patient and carer information leaflet. Posters will be displayed on each ward defining the role of the named nurse to ensure that both patients and carers are clear about what to expect. A named nurse checklist has also been established to support Registered Nurses to carry out this role. This provides a clear accountability and audit trail whilst setting standards around timely communication with relatives and carers.”

    Source location

    2017-0440-Leicestershire-Partnership-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 July 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Display posters on each ward defining the named nurse’s role for patients and carers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The service has approved the updated named nurse role and responsibility patient and carer information leaflet. Posters will be displayed on each ward defining the role of the named nurse to ensure that both patients and carers are clear about what to expect. A named nurse checklist has also been established to support Registered Nurses to carry out this role. This provides a clear accountability and audit trail whilst setting standards around timely communication with relatives and carers.”

    Source location

    2017-0440-Leicestershire-Partnership-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 July 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Undertake a spot-check audit against NICE quality standards for hospital care involving older-person mental-health inpatient admissions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust further acknowledges the Coroner’s concern that it has not engaged with family members of patients with mental health issues which is contrary to Nice Guideline 136¹. With particular reference to mental health services for older people and inpatient admissions the service will be undertaking a spot check audit against the quality standard’s as set out for hospital care.”

    Source location

    2017-0440-Leicestershire-Partnership-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 July 2017

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026