Recurring concern

Failure to reliably conduct clinically required medication reviews

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 16 Apr 2014•Latest report 8 Feb 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of the medication-review process, including identifying when a review is required, arranging or completing the review, obtaining relevant pharmacy or clinical input, reviewing medication-related discrepancies and maintaining required review frequency where the review is needed to support safe prescribing and treatment.

Not included

  • Excludes medication prescribing, administration, dispensing, supply or monitoring failures where a medication review is not itself the deficient control.
  • Excludes generic clinical review, diagnosis or treatment-review failures that do not materially concern review of medication or medication-related decisions.
  • Excludes long-term medication review where the assertion is specifically bounded to a dedicated long-term-review programme and does not support the broader clinically required medication-review condition.
  • Excludes generic documentation, staffing, communication or electronic-alert deficiencies unless they directly cause a clinically required medication review to be missed or left incomplete.
Reports
31

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
37

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
84

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB3
Department of Health and Social Care3
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board3
Care Quality Commission2
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust2
North East London NHS Foundation Trust2
Alexander Court Care Centre1
Alvaston Medical Centre1
Ashlea Medical Practice1
Berrywood Hospital1
Bow School1
Brighton and Hove City Council1
Bromley by Bow Health Centre1
Cardiff & Vale University LHB1
Care Inspectorate Wales1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. North Wales (East and Central)

    AI-generated summary

    Nora Jane Foulkes · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Nora Jane Foulkes, an 87-year-old resident of a residential home, was admitted to hospital on 11 April 2021 and died on 16 April 2021. Her untreated hypothyroidism was contributory to her death, which was due to cardiorespiratory failure resulting from bronchopneumonia and an existing cardiac condition. Concerns included the failure to restart and subsequently monitor her hypothyroidism treatment, and the lack of routine medication review during ANP visits because of time constraints.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Absence of proper medication scrutiny or review during each care home visit

    Wider context from the report

    “3. I am concerned that the absence of proper scrutiny or review of the medication of elderly patients in care homes during each visit presents a risk to life as it can lead to the type of error which occurred in this case not being identified. ”

    Source location

    Nora Jane Foulkes · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct a formal internal investigation to identify root causes and lessons learned.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Due to the incident not being reported at the time, a formal review was not undertaken or reviewed by the Health Board’s Incident Learning Panel. We will conduct a formal internal investigation to identify root causes and lessons learned. Which will be disseminated to all district nursing teams. This will be completed by 30 June 2022.”

    Source location

    Response from BCUHB
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disseminate the internal investigation’s lessons to all district nursing teams.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Due to the incident not being reported at the time, a formal review was not undertaken or reviewed by the Health Board’s Incident Learning Panel. We will conduct a formal internal investigation to identify root causes and lessons learned. Which will be disseminated to all district nursing teams. This will be completed by 30 June 2022.”

    Source location

    Response from BCUHB
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct and document medication reviews at every local district nursing visit using a checklist countersigned by the care home.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Concern was also noted that whilst ANPs could access medication charts if required, this was not being done routinely. I can advise changes have been made to the way the local District Nursing team in the Ruthin and Conwy locality work, which incorporates a documented medication review at each visit. A check list has been developed to prompt clinical staff to review key criteria at each visit, including medication changes/administration. The checklist is initiated by both the visiting nurse and the home manager/deputy. The checklist forms part of the patient’s individual nursing record for review and auditing.”

    Source location

    Response from BCUHB
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Survey all district nursing teams to assess compliance with consistent medication-review practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The learning from this matter, including the medication review issues identified above, will be checked across all district nursing teams to ensure consistent practice across the Health Board. We will survey all teams to assess their level of compliance. This will be completed by 30 June 2022.”

    Source location

    Response from BCUHB
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop or adapt district nursing standard operating procedures and checklists to assure medication reviews.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following this survey, all district nursing teams will develop (or review and adapt) a Standard Operating Procedure/checklist to meet the needs of their own services that provides assurance of medication reviews. This will be completed by 31 December 2022. We will discuss with our Clinical Effectiveness Team how this can be audited over a longer period of time, to ensure that we have ongoing assurance that the changes have been embedded and sustained.”

    Source location

    Response from BCUHB
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss with the Clinical Effectiveness Team how to audit medication-review changes over the longer term.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following this survey, all district nursing teams will develop (or review and adapt) a Standard Operating Procedure/checklist to meet the needs of their own services that provides assurance of medication reviews. This will be completed by 31 December 2022. We will discuss with our Clinical Effectiveness Team how this can be audited over a longer period of time, to ensure that we have ongoing assurance that the changes have been embedded and sustained.”

    Source location

    Response from BCUHB
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review a proposal for structured medication-review collaboration between Central Community Pharmacy and the Central Community Resource Team.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A proposal has been developed (currently under review) for the Central Community Pharmacy team to work more collaboratively with the Central (Area) Community Resource Team (CRT) which will include regular structured medication reviews for nursing and residential home patients.”

    Source location

    Response from BCUHB
    Page 3 · response
    Published 27 April 2022

    Open published response
  2. Derby and Derbyshire

    AI-generated summary

    Maria Susan McGAURAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Maria Susan McGAURAN had been prescribed codeine and citalopram and died at home on 28 November 2018 due to the combined toxicity of those medications. Concerns were raised that she had hoarded and taken medication erratically, but the Surgery did not undertake a requested medication review or consider alternative pain management earlier.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to undertake a medication review in response to known excessive, hoarded and erratic medication use

    Wider context from the report

    “Ms McGauran had over several years been known to take excessive amounts of her codeine prescription medication. She had a history of hoarding medication and taking her medication erratically. Her family raised concerns with the Surgery as to her reliance on several differing medications. They requested that a review of her medications be undertaken. No such review was undertaken. The Surgery could have considered alternative pain management aids at an earlier stage (such as the Fentanyl patches considered only 1 month before death i.e. in October 2018) so as to prevent the risks of overdose. ”

    Source location

    Maria Susan McGAURAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Recruit two clinical pharmacists to support patient medication reviews.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. Taking advantage of the expanding job roles within primary care, over the period January to February 2021, Alvaston Medical Centre recruited two clinical pharmacists to undergo patient medication reviews. The clinical pharmacist's area of professional expertise means they are ideally suited to conducting structured medication reviews of patients – including extensive knowledge of controlled drugs. As part of the medication review, they explore the patient’s compliance and understanding of their medication, along with addressing other concerns within their remit.”

    Source location

    2022-0098-Response-from-Alvaston-Medical-Centre_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct structured, holistic medication reviews covering compliance, understanding, social history, lifestyle and medication changes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. Taking advantage of the expanding job roles within primary care, over the period January to February 2021, Alvaston Medical Centre recruited two clinical pharmacists to undergo patient medication reviews. The clinical pharmacist's area of professional expertise means they are ideally suited to conducting structured medication reviews of patients – including extensive knowledge of controlled drugs. As part of the medication review, they explore the patient’s compliance and understanding of their medication, along with addressing other concerns within their remit.”

    Source location

    2022-0098-Response-from-Alvaston-Medical-Centre_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Prevent high-risk scheduled drugs from forming part of repeat prescriptions wherever possible.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. Alvaston has also made it good practice, to ensure wherever possible, any high risk scheduled drugs do not form part of the repeat prescription. Furthermore, we have a robust system in place to ensure the prescribing of medications is not automatically ordered too far in advance of their due date. This reduces the risk of any patient's 'stock-piling' medication. This is an ongoing project that is constantly being reviewed and refined, and we continue to further assess which areas or medications would benefit from additional surveillance during the prescribing and issuing of the prescription.”

    Source location

    2022-0098-Response-from-Alvaston-Medical-Centre_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Prevent prescriptions from being ordered automatically too far in advance of their due dates.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. Alvaston has also made it good practice, to ensure wherever possible, any high risk scheduled drugs do not form part of the repeat prescription. Furthermore, we have a robust system in place to ensure the prescribing of medications is not automatically ordered too far in advance of their due date. This reduces the risk of any patient's 'stock-piling' medication. This is an ongoing project that is constantly being reviewed and refined, and we continue to further assess which areas or medications would benefit from additional surveillance during the prescribing and issuing of the prescription.”

    Source location

    2022-0098-Response-from-Alvaston-Medical-Centre_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue assessing medications and prescribing areas that would benefit from additional surveillance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. Alvaston has also made it good practice, to ensure wherever possible, any high risk scheduled drugs do not form part of the repeat prescription. Furthermore, we have a robust system in place to ensure the prescribing of medications is not automatically ordered too far in advance of their due date. This reduces the risk of any patient's 'stock-piling' medication. This is an ongoing project that is constantly being reviewed and refined, and we continue to further assess which areas or medications would benefit from additional surveillance during the prescribing and issuing of the prescription.”

    Source location

    2022-0098-Response-from-Alvaston-Medical-Centre_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 April 2022

    Open published response
  3. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Bruce Lee Houghton · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Bruce Lee Houghton died at home on 16 April 2020 from combined drug toxicity, with excess paracetamol likely causing liver damage and accumulation of his other medications. The report states that he had not had his annual medication review, and that these reviews did not ask patients about over-the-counter medicines they purchased in addition to prescribed medication.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete annual medication reviews

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The Court heard the deceased had not had his annual medication review. The court heard evidence that at these reviews the patients are not asked about any over the counter medication they may purchase in addition to their prescribed medication. ”

    Source location

    Bruce Lee Houghton · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ask patients about over-the-counter medication during medication reviews

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The Court heard the deceased had not had his annual medication review. The court heard evidence that at these reviews the patients are not asked about any over the counter medication they may purchase in addition to their prescribed medication. ”

    Source location

    Bruce Lee Houghton · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Participate in monthly multidisciplinary meetings with mental health, social care and other providers, including network pharmacist medication reviews for people of concern.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. Ms Kearsley specified in the Regulation 28 report that her concern related to the fact that the Court heard that the deceased had not had his annual medication review and that the Court heard evidence that at these reviews the patients were not asked about any over the counter medication they may purchase in addition to their prescribed medication.”

    Source location

    2021-0160-Response-from-Uplands-Medical-Practice_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 24 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create a standardised medication-review questionnaire prompting enquiries about over-the-counter medicines and supplements at prescribing and annual reviews.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “6. The Practice is in the process of creating a standardised medication review template based on good medical practice which will include a prompt to routinely trigger an enquiry as to if the patient is taking any over the counter medication, or supplements at the point of prescribing and at annual reviews. The clinical staff at the practice will all be made aware that they are to complete this questionnaire when prescribing new medication to a patient or when they are conducting a medication review.”

    Source location

    2021-0160-Response-from-Uplands-Medical-Practice_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Move to a clinical IT system with integrated prescribing-safety prompts, medication-review prompts and visual reminders.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “8. The Practice along with all the practices in Bury is in the process of moving to a new clinical IT system and it is our understanding that this has integrated prompts to improve the prescribing safety. This should assist staff who are prescribing in when it is appropriate to conduct a medication review and provide visual reminders. The Practice is due to have the new system in place by March 2022.”

    Source location

    2021-0160-Response-from-Uplands-Medical-Practice_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Recruit three additional permanent salaried GPs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “10. The medication review questionnaire and when it should be used will be included in the Practice’s prescribing policy and in-house Practice training on conducting a good medication review will be set up which I will lead. I will be assisted by the Practice manager. The first training on this will occur once the new GPs are in post. The training will also be provided for all new staff as part of their induction, and they will be asked to review the Practice’s prescribing policy. The practice aims to share this fully for feedback at the next practice meeting in August 2021 (17th August 2021) with a view to implementing it thereafter.”

    Source location

    2021-0160-Response-from-Uplands-Medical-Practice_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Include the medication-review questionnaire in the prescribing policy and provide medication-review training for clinical and new staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “10. The medication review questionnaire and when it should be used will be included in the Practice’s prescribing policy and in-house Practice training on conducting a good medication review will be set up which I will lead. I will be assisted by the Practice manager. The first training on this will occur once the new GPs are in post. The training will also be provided for all new staff as part of their induction, and they will be asked to review the Practice’s prescribing policy. The practice aims to share this fully for feedback at the next practice meeting in August 2021 (17th August 2021) with a view to implementing it thereafter.”

    Source location

    2021-0160-Response-from-Uplands-Medical-Practice_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Employ a permanent pharmacist with medication-review competency and responsibility for improving the prescribing policy and questionnaire.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “11. The Practice has employed a permanent pharmacist who is set to join in October 2021, after a thorough competency-based interview which specifically included questions about competency in conducting medication reviews and if they were routinely enquiring about over the counter medications as part of these. This was important to the Practice to ensure the pharmacist understands the goals of the Practice. The permanent pharmacist will then have an influence on the prescribing policy and the medication”

    Source location

    2021-0160-Response-from-Uplands-Medical-Practice_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Recall patients with serious mental health conditions for detailed structured medication reviews, with Mental Health Lead oversight and dedicated administrative support.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “13. As part of the Covid recovery the Practice is in the process of sending out invites as part of the recall system. The Practice will prioritise the completion of a detailed structured medication review for all patients with serious mental health conditions as defined in the Quality Outcomes Framework (QOF). Mr. Houghton would have been included in this group of patients. As the Mental Health Lead for the Practice, I will have oversight of this process. A dedicated member of staff will manage this, and the Practice is looking to train up a mental health champion to support this. We expect to have this in place by the end of August 2021.”

    Source location

    2021-0160-Response-from-Uplands-Medical-Practice_Published
    Page 3 · response
    Published 24 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create and monthly review an electronic, traffic-light safety net to prioritise health checks and medication reviews for higher-risk mental health patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “14. The higher risk mental health patients will be invited for a health check first and then subsequently all patients with known mental health conditions will be invited for a medication review. The Practice will aim to complete medication reviews of the higher risk patients with serious mental health conditions by the end of December 2021 with all patients having completed this by March 2022. An electronic document will be created as a safety net to prioritise these patients and reviewed monthly with the support of a mental health champion to ensure the patient has a health check followed by a medication review with a GP or pharmacist. This document will be completed by the end of August 2021, and a traffic light system will be used to identify patients needing urgent, medium, and less urgent reviews in order of priority.”

    Source location

    2021-0160-Response-from-Uplands-Medical-Practice_Published
    Page 3 · response
    Published 24 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Engage Royal College of General Practitioners practice-development support to review Practice processes and planned safety measures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “15. The Practice is engaging the practice development support of the Royal College of GPs to review the Practice processes currently in place and the plans shared above, for feedback and review. I would be happy to provide a further update to the coroner regarding the progress in November 2021 if that is acceptable.”

    Source location

    2021-0160-Response-from-Uplands-Medical-Practice_Published
    Page 3 · response
    Published 24 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide local teams with advice and guidance supporting shared decision-making and appropriately timed medication reviews.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• GM Medicines Management Group (GMMMG) to provide advice and guidance for local teams to implement, including support to ensure shared decision making with patients and medication reviews occurring on an ideally annual (or sooner if required) basis.”

    Source location

    2021-0160-Response-from-GMCA_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share the medication-review questionnaire with partner practices and Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership for feedback and good-practice dissemination.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “7. This questionnaire will be shared with the 3 other GP practices that are involved in the multidisciplinary team and will also be shared with Manchester Health and Social care Partnership for their views to see if it can be improved in any way and to promote good practice. I have already liaised with Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership to ask for their support and ████████, Senior Primary care Manager for Quality Improvement across Greater Manchester has informed me she will investigate how they can assist. Once this feedback has been received the Practice will look to embed the questionnaire within the current clinical system (Vision) although due to its limitations this may not be possible until the Practice moves to a new clinical system.”

    Source location

    2021-0160-Response-from-Uplands-Medical-Practice_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Local teams are responsible for implementing Greater Manchester medicines advice and guidance, while GMMMG provides supporting advice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• GM Medicines Management Group (GMMMG) to provide advice and guidance for local teams to implement, including support to ensure shared decision making with patients and medication reviews occurring on an ideally annual (or sooner if required) basis.”

    Source location

    2021-0160-Response-from-GMCA_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing GP medication reviews and PCN Structured Medication Reviews are considered sufficient to address medication-review concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am advised that GP practices are expected to review patient medication on a regular basis as part of the primary medical services provided under the GP contract.”

    Source location

    2021-0160-Response-from-Department-of-Health-Social-Care_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 24 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The questionnaire may not be embeddable in the current clinical system because of its limitations, until the Practice moves to a new system.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “7. This questionnaire will be shared with the 3 other GP practices that are involved in the multidisciplinary team and will also be shared with Manchester Health and Social care Partnership for their views to see if it can be improved in any way and to promote good practice. I have already liaised with Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership to ask for their support and ████████, Senior Primary care Manager for Quality Improvement across Greater Manchester has informed me she will investigate how they can assist. Once this feedback has been received the Practice will look to embed the questionnaire within the current clinical system (Vision) although due to its limitations this may not be possible until the Practice moves to a new clinical system.”

    Source location

    2021-0160-Response-from-Uplands-Medical-Practice_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 May 2021

    Open published response
  4. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Wendy Margaret Wilkes · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Wendy Margaret Wilkes was found at her home on 6 August 2019, with toxicology showing a fatal level of ethanol and concomitant use of gabapentin, zopiclone, diazepam and amitriptyline. Concerns were raised about the absence of a clear system for alert notes and follow-up reviews, and about whether prescribers were aware of her high alcohol use and assessed the risks of mixing alcohol with her medication.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of follow-up review appointments for prescribed medication

    Wider context from the report

    “The inquest heard that there was no clear system of alert notes/follow up review appointments at her GP practice despite the extent of the prescribed medication; ”

    Source location

    Wendy Margaret Wilkes · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Flag patients at risk from neuropathic medication and alcohol dependence, conduct medication reviews, and contact them about medication and alcohol consumption.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Alert Note/Review System effective from 25 February 2020 The practice has identified relevant existing patients by running reports for patients coded on the practice’s clinical system as using neuropathic medication, cross referenced with patients coded with alcohol dependency who have had an intentional or accidental overdose. A “flag” is now placed on these patients’ medical records and a medication review is undertaken. The patients are then contacted to discuss their medication and their alcohol consumption.”

    Source location

    2020-0095-Response-from-Tameside-Glossop_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 May 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue an alert to all GP practices about alert notes, follow-up reviews and considering systems to identify high alcohol use during prescribing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. An alert will be issued to all GP practices to ensure that they have clear systems of alert notes/follow up review appointments for individuals with extensive prescribed medications. The alert also requests GP practices consider how their systems can alert prescribers to patients with high alcohol usage when prescribing medications to ensure effective risk assessments can be carried out.”

    Source location

    2020-0095-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 May 2020

    Open published response
  5. Inner West London

    AI-generated summary

    Theresa Margaret Feehan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Theresa Margaret Feehan, who had severe oxygen- and steroid-dependent allergic asthma, was found deceased at home on 12 March 2018. The court recorded aspiration pneumonia and ingestion of amitriptyline and dihydrocodeine as the medical cause of death, with natural causes combined with side effects of prescribed medication. Concerns included inadequate medication review, incomplete medical-history recording, poor correlation between medication and problem lists, insufficient systems for identifying harmful medication interactions, and inadequate supervision of administrative work.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate medication review systems

    Wider context from the report

    “1. That the system of medication review within the practice is inadequate putting patients at risk. ”

    Source location

    Theresa Margaret Feehan · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inspections ultimately found no concerns in the areas identified, so there was no basis for enforcement action.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The provider made significant challenges to the findings we made. We accepted those challenges and decided there was no basis for us to take enforcement action. We also carried out a full and comprehensive rated inspection in June 2019. I attach copies of the reports of both of these inspections. They are also available on our website under the “All reports” link at https://www.cqc.org.uk/location/1-549237033.”

    Source location

    2019-0070-Amended-Response-from-Care-Quality-Commission-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 9 June 2019

    Open published response
  6. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Malcolm John Rathmell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Malcolm Rathmell was admitted after a fall and his pelvic fracture was not diagnosed until several days later. He was incorrectly given warfarin intended for another patient, subsequently suffered retroperitoneal bleeding, and died after developing bronchopneumonia. Concerns included failures to identify the incorrect prescription, the absence of a ward-based pharmacy review, and insufficient implemented action to address the risk of future deaths.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of ward-based pharmacy review

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) There was no ward based pharmacy review between 15.03.18 and 22.03.18. ”

    Source location

    Malcolm John Rathmell · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Mrs Ruth Ellen Edwards · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mrs Ruth Ellen Edwards died at home on 31 August 2018 after hanging herself from an attic ladder, following a long history of mental health problems and previous suicide attempts. Concerns included her discharge after a drug overdose without psychiatric liaison assessment, inadequate risk assessment and inaccurate communication about the overdose, and potentially insufficient medication reviews despite access to many medications at home.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to perform suitably frequent medication reviews

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) The GP practice may not have performed suitably frequent medication reviews with Mrs Edwards. Many boxes of different tablets were found at the family home, many on repeat prescription, posing an overdose risk. ”

    Source location

    Mrs Ruth Ellen Edwards · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Employ a full-time clinical pharmacist to oversee and improve prescribing governance and patient monitoring.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Specifically with relation to the comments regarding medication reviews with ourselves as General Practitioners, we would recognise that this presents a particular challenge to us and safe prescribing of medicine requires a great deal of resource. In the last 12 months we have taken on a Clinical Pharmacist within the Practice Team on a full time basis whose responsibility it has been to oversee and improve the governance regarding repeat prescribing and acute prescribing of medications plus patient monitoring. We have in fact achieved an NHS award for quality improvement in this area and although this may have come too late for Mrs Edwards in order to reduce her risk, I would be confident that we have made great strides over and above that we would expect to meet standards of our General Practice.”

    Source location

    2018-0395-Response-by-West-Quay-Centre
    Page 1 · response
    Published 17 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss the report’s medication-review and high-risk-patient learning at the monthly significant-events meeting with clinical staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “That said, we would also bring these comments to our monthly significant events meeting to highlight the importance of medication reviews and high risk patients to all of our clinical staff.”

    Source location

    2018-0395-Response-by-West-Quay-Centre
    Page 1 · response
    Published 17 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Raise medication-review frequency as a practice issue with the Primary, Community and Intermediate Care Clinical Board for consideration.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The GP practice may not have performed suitable frequent medication reviews with Mrs Edwards. Many boxes of different tablets were found at the family home. Many on repeat prescription posing an overdose risk.”

    Source location

    2018-0395-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Medication review for patients managed in primary care is a matter for the GP practice and Primary, Community and Intermediate Care Clinical Board.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The GP practice may not have performed suitable frequent medication reviews with Mrs Edwards. Many boxes of different tablets were found at the family home. Many on repeat prescription posing an overdose risk.”

    Source location

    2018-0395-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 May 2019

    Open published response
  8. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Russell Charles ROBB · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Russell Charles ROBB died at Manchester Royal Infirmary on 9 April 2016 after taking a fatal combination of prescribed and non-prescribed drugs with alcohol. The report identified inadequate monitoring and lack of regular medication reviews, no apparent guidelines to limit the quantity of drugs available, and limited information sharing between agencies involved in adult safeguarding.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of regular medication reviews

    Wider context from the report

    “which ultimately led to his death. There was no evidence of regular reviews of his medication. There appeared to be no guidelines in place to reduce the quantity of drugs available to Mr Robb at any one time. (CCG; Secretary of State for Health) 2. There was limited evidence of information sharing between the members of the Trafford Adult Safeguarding Board. This meant that the Local Authority were unaware of volume of interaction between the Police and Mr Robb.(Adult Safeguarding Board).As a result only 1 strategic meeting took place over a 6 year period ”

    Source location

    Russell Charles ROBB · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Percy Jacks · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Percy Jacks died from a pulmonary embolus after being found unresponsive the morning following treatment for chest pain. The report identified failings in the management of his anticoagulation medication, including poor communication between the hospital, GP surgery and care home, and inadequate systems for ensuring the medication continued for the intended period.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of medication review for correct Rivaroxaban dosage and duration

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The system within the GP surgery for prescribing Rivaroxaban was poor and relied solely on receiving the notification of the results of the scan from the hospital. There was no facility to review the medication to ensure that the correct dosage for the correct period of time continued to be prescribed. ”

    Source location

    Percy Jacks · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. South Yorkshire (Eastern)

    AI-generated summary

    Craig Stuart Hamilton · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Craig Stuart Hamilton died on 8 December 2016 from acute tramadol toxicity after taking excess Tramadol to relieve chronic pain and sleep before working the next day. The principal concerns were the absence of clear procedures for managing patients who obtain or take more medication than prescribed, and insufficient exploration of medication regimes, alternative pain management, and discussions about exceeding prescribed dosages.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of procedures to fully explore drug regimens and alternative pain management at annual medication reviews

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) Absence of clear procedures to fully explore drug regimes and alternative forms of pain management at annual medication reviews. ”

    Source location

    Craig Stuart Hamilton · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026