18 Dec 2014 Mr Kevin Lawrenson · Prevention of Future Deaths report Oxfordshire
View report summary
Concerns raised 1
Inadequate visibility of signage for slow-moving vehicles View source
This report raised 1 other concern. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised. 1
National Highways
Instruct UK Highways M40 Limited to initiate work improving signing on the southbound approach to Stokenchurch Cutting.
View source
×
AI-generated summary
Mr Kevin Lawrenson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.
Report summary
Mr Kevin Lawrenson died after his works van collided with the rear of a slow-moving lorry on the M40 southbound near Junction 6 in Oxfordshire. The concerns related to slow-moving vehicles, signage and possible measures to reduce the likelihood of similar collisions, noting that there had been several similar accidents and three fatalities at or near the location since 2008.
Read the report on judiciary.uk
× Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Inadequate visibility of signage for slow-moving vehicles
Wider context from the report “The MATTERS OF CONCERN are in relation to slow moving vehicles at the location, signage and steps that may be possible to reduce the likelihood of a similar accident occurring in future.
It will be seen from paragraph 2.3 of ████████ report that there have been a large number of similar accidents at or near this location, including 3 fatalities since 2008. It will also be seen from paragraph 3.1.1 of ████████ report there is a photograph of the first of the 2 signs. It does not appear to be a very large sign; it is sited quite low down.
I heard oral evidence from Mr ████████ about the system of monitoring and reporting in place and that, as recommended in the 2013 Safety Monitoring Report prepared on behalf of UK Highways Limited, a further study between junction 5 to 6 has been undertaken and a report is due to be completed very shortly. It is understood that the report is likely to outline possible improvements to signage and other steps. For example, there is the potential of increasing signage and/ or making the additional signs more visible . I was told there was insufficient room in the central reservation to place a sign. I understand chevrons for lane separation is a possibility, as is an electronic sign which detects slow moving vehicles and warns other motorists. I appreciate of course that there will be considerations around the issue of funding if improvements are to be implemented.
” Source location Mr Kevin Lawrenson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
Open source report
×
Source evidence
How this respondent action was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Instruct UK Highways M40 Limited to initiate work improving signing on the southbound approach to Stokenchurch Cutting.
Verbatim wording from the response “We have carefully considered the recommendations in this report and we have now instructed UK Highways M40 Limited to initiate work to improve signing on the southbound approach to the Stokenchurch Cutting.” Source location 2014-0577-Response-by-Highways-Agency
Open published response
16 Oct 2014 Roger William Maurice De Klerk · Prevention of Future Deaths report South London
View report summary
Concerns raised 1
Confusing signage misrepresenting the tram route as a cycle route View source
This report raised 6 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
×
AI-generated summary
Roger William Maurice De Klerk · Prevention of Future Deaths report
This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.
Report summary
On 12 November 2013, Roger William Maurice De Klerk was cycling along Addiscombe Road when his bicycle wheels contacted tramlines, causing him to fall into the path of a bus. The bus collided with him and his bicycle. Concerns included the danger posed by tramlines to cyclists, confusing cycle-lane design and signage, and the intended route across tactile paving and pedestrian areas.
Read the report on judiciary.uk
× Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Confusing signage misrepresenting the tram route as a cycle route
Wider context from the report “(4) The signage at the junction is confusing and appears to suggest that the tram route is a cycle route , yet the lines are frequently close to pavement at the junction and at other areas further along Addiscombe Road
” Source location Roger William Maurice De Klerk · Prevention of Future Deaths report
Open source report
×
Source evidence
How this respondent action was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Review signing and markings at Croydon sites where cyclists cross tram tracks and rectify confusing arrangements.
Verbatim wording from the response “The council also appreciates that the issues for cyclists when crossing the tram tracks may exist at other locations along the tram network. For this reason the Council has discussed with TfL Tramlink the possible application of proprietary products which fill the gap in but to date have not found anything that is suitable for in street application and that do not have a significant risk to the operation. However Tramlink are committed to researching other solutions and have meetings set up in the New Year with railway suppliers and plastic suppliers. We will review signing and markings at all other sites in Croydon where cyclists cross the tram tracks to check for and rectify any other potentially confusing signing and marking.” Source location 2014-0448-Response-De-Klerk
Open published response
×
Source evidence
How this respondent position was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation No suitable proprietary product has been found to fill tram-track gaps without creating a significant operational risk.
Verbatim wording from the response “The council also appreciates that the issues for cyclists when crossing the tram tracks may exist at other locations along the tram network. For this reason the Council has discussed with TfL Tramlink the possible application of proprietary products which fill the gap in but to date have not found anything that is suitable for in street application and that do not have a significant risk to the operation. However Tramlink are committed to researching other solutions and have meetings set up in the New Year with railway suppliers and plastic suppliers. We will review signing and markings at all other sites in Croydon where cyclists cross the tram tracks to check for and rectify any other potentially confusing signing and marking.” Source location 2014-0448-Response-De-Klerk
Open published response
9 Oct 2014 Tracy Michelle ROOKE · Prevention of Future Deaths report Wiltshire and Swindon
View report summary
Concerns raised 2
Deficiencies in road signage, including its location and condition View source Inadequate signage near the start of the muddied section of highway View source
This report raised 2 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
No linked response statements No respondent-stated action or position is linked to these concerns in the published data.
×
AI-generated summary
Tracy Michelle ROOKE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.
Report summary
Tracy Michelle Rooke died after losing control of her vehicle on the A3102 at Mile Elm, crossing the centre of the road and colliding with an oncoming van. The report identified thick fog and her unfamiliarity with the road as factors that more likely than not contributed to the incident and her death. A concern was raised about mud on the highway and the quality of nearby signage as potential hazards, although the report states that the mud played no part in Ms Rooke’s death.
Read the report on judiciary.uk
× Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Deficiencies in road signage, including its location and condition
Wider context from the report “During the course of the Inquest I heard evidence from ████████ whose role is the Force’s Traffic Management and Road Safety Assessment Officer. He is a former Collision Investigator. As part of his evidence he produced a copy of his report dated 26 June 2014 in respect of which I believe you received a copy back in June.
In that report and specifically at pages 10 & 11 of the report, a copy of which I have attached to this Regulation 28 report, he sets out a number of recommendations. I share the concerns that are raised by ████████ in his report which focuses on identified issues concerning road signage, the location of road signage and the current state of road signage in this particular area .
I am concerned that if these are not addressed that they potentially could contribute to future road traffic incidents that may result in injury or even death.
I am additionally concerned having regard to the evidence that ████████ gave in respect of which he indicated that whilst you have been given a copy of his report including recommendations that no action would be taken until I make a report with a view to the prevention of future deaths. That concerns me as Highways Authority you believe there is merit in relation to the recommendations then it should not have to wait until a Coroner makes a report some months after the Traffic Management and Road Safety Assessment Report is submitted before action is taken.
” Source location Tracy Michelle ROOKE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Inadequate signage near the start of the muddied section of highway
Wider context from the report “The above having been said if evidence is presented to a Coroner as part of an Inquest process irrespective of it being unconnected with the circumstances of that person’s death, a Coroner can make a Regulation 28 report if he or she has concerns with a view to prevention of future deaths. I am concerned in relation to the quantity of mud visible in the photographs and also as regards the quality of signage located in such close proximity to the start of the muddied section of highway . I have dealt with deaths on Wiltshire roads that have involved farm mud on the highway and I am aware of the hazard it creates. I fully accept farmers have a livelihood to make however I would ask that you review and inform me of your practice and procedures to deal with mud on the highway and as to whether or not in the light of the photographs your practices could be improved and if so how. You may also like to consider seeking advice from either the National Farmers Union or Wiltshire Council as Highways Authority.
” Source location Tracy Michelle ROOKE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
Open source report
22 Sep 2014 Jerome Antoine Marie GONNET · Prevention of Future Deaths report Teesside
View report summary
Concerns raised 2
Failure of temporary no-entry signs to remain noticeable at the slip road exit View source Lack of advance road-sign information identifying the slip road as no entry View source
This report raised 1 other concern. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
×
AI-generated summary
Jerome Antoine Marie GONNET · Prevention of Future Deaths report
This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.
Report summary
On 2 May 2012, Jerome Antoine Marie GONNET was a passenger in a car involved in a head-on collision after a female driver travelled the wrong way along the A66 eastbound carriageway. Concerns included unclear advance signage for the no-entry slip road and temporary no-entry signs that could be knocked over and become unnoticeable; two further drivers reportedly later used the exit slip road in the same way.
Read the report on judiciary.uk
× Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Failure of temporary no-entry signs to remain noticeable at the slip road exit
Wider context from the report “(2) At present there are temporary large ‘no entry’ signs at the exit of the slip road junction which have, on occasions, been knocked over and subsequently rendered unnoticeable .
” Source location Jerome Antoine Marie GONNET · Prevention of Future Deaths report
Open source report × Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Lack of advance road-sign information identifying the slip road as no entry
Wider context from the report “(1) It is unclear in advance of approaching the junction that the slip road upon which the female drove is ‘no entry’ slip road. There is no information in this regard on the road signs surrounding the junction.
” Source location Jerome Antoine Marie GONNET · Prevention of Future Deaths report
Open source report
×
Source evidence
How this respondent action was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Maintain supplementary illuminated “No entry” signs through regular inspection and prompt damage rectification.
Verbatim wording from the response “In response to the road traffic collision of 2 May 2012, and at Cleveland Police’s request, supplementary ‘No entry’ signs, which are in addition to those mandated under statutory requirements, have been installed. However, one of these signs has been placed in a block paved area of carriageway and this sign is at times knocked over by passing vehicles, as indicated by the Report.” Source location 2014-0415-Response-by-A-one.pdf
Open published response
×
Source evidence
How this respondent action was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Investigate options for safety improvements at the interchange following reported wrong-way driving incidents.
Verbatim wording from the response “3. Two other incidents have been reported involving drivers travelling in the wrong direction on this exit slip road.” Source location 2014-0415-Response-by-A-one.pdf
Open published response
×
Source evidence
How this respondent action was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Submit a proposal for interchange safety improvement works during the next improvement-scheme funding round.
Verbatim wording from the response “Both A-one+ and the Highways Agency have been made aware of one of these incidents by Cleveland Police. I can advise that an investigation has been undertaken to identify options for improvement at this interchange. The improvements which are being considered include installing demountable bollards or marker posts in the block paved area and installing additional road markings.” Source location 2014-0415-Response-by-A-one.pdf
Open published response
×
Source evidence
How this respondent position was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Permanent signs cannot be installed in the block-paved area because escorted abnormal loads must pass through it.
Verbatim wording from the response “The block paved area at this location was installed to address problems associated with the lower than normal bridge deck level at Elton Interchange when the interchange was originally constructed. When abnormally tall and wide or long loads are being moved along the A66 eastbound carriageway, these vehicles are required to divert from the main carriageway of the A66 over the extents of this interchange. Some of these vehicles, under escort, need to pass through the block paved area and travel in an anticlockwise direction around the roundabout’s circulatory carriageway, in order to rejoin the A66.” Source location 2014-0415-Response-by-A-one.pdf
Open published response
×
Source evidence
How this respondent position was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Proposed interchange improvements depend on securing funding through the Highways Agency's prioritised improvement-scheme bidding process.
Verbatim wording from the response “Both A-one+ and the Highways Agency have been made aware of one of these incidents by Cleveland Police. I can advise that an investigation has been undertaken to identify options for improvement at this interchange. The improvements which are being considered include installing demountable bollards or marker posts in the block paved area and installing additional road markings.” Source location 2014-0415-Response-by-A-one.pdf
Open published response
×
Source evidence
How this respondent position was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Responsibility for advance signs on local roads and roundabouts rests with Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council, not the Highways Agency or A-one+.
Verbatim wording from the response “Local highway authorities are responsible for the management of maintenance of local roads, which are outside of the Highways Agency’s remit.” Source location 2014-0415-Response-by-A-one.pdf
Open published response
19 Jun 2014 Names not published · Prevention of Future Deaths report West Somerset
View report summary
Concerns raised 1
Insufficient use of overhead gantries displaying reduced-visibility warnings View source
This report raised 8 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
No linked response statements No respondent-stated action or position is linked to these concerns in the published data.
×
AI-generated summary
Names not published · Prevention of Future Deaths report
This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.
Report summary
Seven people died when 34 vehicles collided in thick fog on the M5 motorway near Taunton on 4 November 2011; 51 others were injured. The concerns related to preventing vehicles entering areas of severely reduced visibility, detecting and warning of fog, and managing risks from firework displays that may increase fog or smoke near highways.
Read the report on judiciary.uk
× Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Insufficient use of overhead gantries displaying reduced-visibility warnings
Wider context from the report ““A”
I am concerned that the Highway Agency's proposals whilst possibly preventing further vehicles entering an accident scene or a large area of reduced visibility would not prevent the initial incident and that this can only be achieved by the erection of fog detection devises and greater use of overhead gantries displaying signs warning of events that may cause reduced visibility .
AND as the criterion for deploying road safety equipment is six personal injury collisions in three years the present incident would not qualify for special consideration.
” Source location Names not published · Prevention of Future Deaths report
Open source report
28 Apr 2014 Miss Yasmin Mary Richards · Prevention of Future Deaths report Avon
View report summary
Concerns raised 1
Inadequate road signs and carriageway markings warning drivers about the severity of approaching bends View source
This report raised 2 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised. 1
National Highways
Install vehicle-activated signs on both approaches to Hartley Bends.
View source
×
AI-generated summary
Miss Yasmin Mary Richards · Prevention of Future Deaths report
This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.
Report summary
Miss Yasmin Mary Richards died at the scene after her Ford Ka crossed into the opposing carriageway and collided with a Range Rover on the A46 on 2 November 2013. The inquest heard that worn and under-inflated tyres contributed to the collision, alongside the vehicle’s speed and the driver’s inexperience. Concerns were raised about repeated collisions on the same section of road and the adequacy of the speed limit, signs, carriageway markings and other measures at the bends.
Read the report on judiciary.uk
× Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Inadequate road signs and carriageway markings warning drivers about the severity of approaching bends
Wider context from the report “(1) Notwithstanding the contribution made to this collision by the condition of the tyres of Ford Ka this is the second Inquest I have conducted within the past 12 months into the death of a driver who lost control of their vehicle on the same section of the A46.
(2)The speed limit in the section of the A46 known as the 'Hartley Bends' should be reviewed and reduced so as to improve the safety of drivers as they approach these bends.
(3) The road signs including carriageway markings should be reviewed and improved so as to provide greater warning to drivers as to the severity of the approaching bends .
(4) Consideration be given to the provision of ‘rumble strips’ in advance of the bends so as to further encourage the reduction in the speed of vehicles as they approach the bends.
” Source location Miss Yasmin Mary Richards · Prevention of Future Deaths report
Open source report
×
Source evidence
How this respondent action was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Install vehicle-activated signs on both approaches to Hartley Bends.
Verbatim wording from the response “• Interactive vehicle activated signs (VAS) to be installed on the north and southbound approaches to Hartley Bends. These signs visually are activated by high speed and advise drivers to slow down and of the geometric hazards ahead;” Source location 2014-0193-Response-by-Highway-Agency
Open published response
×
Source evidence
How this respondent position was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Rumble strips are unsuitable on single-carriageway bends because they may reduce traction, create hazards for oncoming vehicles and increase noise.
Verbatim wording from the response “In section 5(3) of your report you make reference to ‘rumble strips’. I believe you are referring to yellow bar markings as used on the approaches to roundabouts. These are not considered suitable for use on single carriageway roads as they need to be laid verge to verge in order for their extremities not to cause a hazard to oncoming vehicles and if used on bends such as the A46 can reduce traction for vehicles. There are also adverse environmental effects such as increased noise.” Source location 2014-0193-Response-by-Highway-Agency
Open published response
24 Mar 2014 Sean Andrew Morley · Prevention of Future Deaths report Warwickshire
View report summary
Concerns raised 1
Lack of warning signs for pedestrians and cyclists using the road View source
This report raised 3 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
×
AI-generated summary
Sean Andrew Morley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.
Report summary
Sean Andrew Morley was struck and killed by a motor vehicle while crossing the A444 Bedworth By-pass on foot between 3am and 4am on 2 September 2012. The report raised concerns that the road was regularly used by pedestrians and cyclists despite having no warning signs, street lighting, barriers, or other protective features, and that these conditions created a risk of further fatal collisions.
Read the report on judiciary.uk
× Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Lack of warning signs for pedestrians and cyclists using the road
Wider context from the report “(1) I heard evidence that the stretch of the A444 where Sean died is regularly used by pedestrians and cyclists, who walk or ride on the grass verge at the side of the carriageway or on the edge of the carriageway itself.
(2) Since Sean’s death, there has been a further incident on the same stretch of road where a pedestrian was struck by a car. Fortunately, the injuries were not fatal.
(3) There are no signs warning pedestrians or cyclists of the dangers of using the road . There are no street lights. The speed limit on the road is 70mph. There is no barrier or other protective features between the vehicular traffic and pedestrians.
(4) These factors strongly suggest that there is a risk of further fatal collisions between vehicles and other road users.
” Source location Sean Andrew Morley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
Open source report
×
Source evidence
How this respondent action was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Install barrier railings and introduce warning signs directing vulnerable road users to alternative routes and warning of dual-carriageway dangers.
Verbatim wording from the response “7. At the inquest, the lack of warning signs to deter pedestrians from using this route was discussed. The Traffic Signs, Regulations and General Directions 2002 which prescribe the types of sign permitted to be used on the highway, do not include signs for this purpose, that are approved for use on the highway. However, Warwickshire County Council has made a commitment to introduce barrier railings, to be positioned at locations where the footway around the roundabout at Walsingham Drive terminates; and warning signs that are designed to inform pedestrians and other vulnerable road users that alternative routes are available, and to advise them of the dangers posed by walking or cycling along a dual carriageway with a 70mph speed limit.” Source location Response from Warwickshire County Council
Open published response
14 Mar 2014 Gavin Anthony ROBERTS · Prevention of Future Deaths report Rotherham
View report summary
Concerns raised 1
Inadequate warning signs at the bend and bridge approach View source
This report raised 1 other concern. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
×
AI-generated summary
Gavin Anthony ROBERTS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.
Report summary
Gavin Anthony Roberts died in a fatal collision while riding his motorcycle on Hollings Lane on 24 October 2013. He lost control after overtaking on a bend and collided with an oncoming vehicle; significantly underinflated tyres were a major factor. The concerns related to the 60 mph speed restriction being higher than the safe speed for the bend, its increase from 40 mph on the approach, and the apparent inadequacy of warning signs given the number of incidents at the location.
Read the report on judiciary.uk
× Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Inadequate warning signs at the bend and bridge approach
Wider context from the report “(1) The current speed restriction of 60 mph is higher than the maximum speed at which
The bend can safely be negotiated.
(2) The speed restriction actually increases from 40 mph to 60 mph on the approach to the bridge.
(3) The warning signs appear to be inadequate in the presence
of (1) and (2) above given the number of recorded incidents at this location.
” Source location Gavin Anthony ROBERTS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
Open source report
×
Source evidence
How this respondent action was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Investigate collisions, traffic speeds, speed-limit suitability and warning-sign adequacy on Rollings Lane.
Verbatim wording from the response “We have noted your concerns about the speed limit and warning signs currently in place on the section of Rollings Lane where the fatal collision took place. As a result we have carried out an investigation that has involved looking at the number and circumstances of collisions that have taken place, the speed of traffic, the suitability of the current speed limit and the adequacy of existing warning signs.” Source location Response from Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
Open published response
×
Source evidence
How this respondent action was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Install a new bend-warning sign, reflective verge marker posts and a repainted SLOW road marking near the railway bridge.
Verbatim wording from the response “In addition, it is planned to improve the warning of the bend near the railway bridge when travelling towards Thrybergh by providing a new bend warning sign, reflective verge marker posts around the bend and repainting an existing ‘SLOW’ marking. These proposals are also shown on the attached drawing.” Source location Response from Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
Open published response
26 Feb 2014 Samuel Eric Shaw · Prevention of Future Deaths report North Northumberland
View report summary
Concerns raised 1
Lack of warning signage for southbound motorists approaching the pedestrian crossing View source
This report raised 2 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
×
AI-generated summary
Samuel Eric Shaw · Prevention of Future Deaths report
This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.
Report summary
Samuel Eric Shaw, aged 70, died after being struck by a southbound ambulance while crossing the A1 at Haggerston on 29 October 2013. Concerns included the absence of warning signs and a central pedestrian refuge, poor lighting, and the need for pedestrians to cross both lanes of a 60 mph road from the bus stop to Haggerston.
Read the report on judiciary.uk
× Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Lack of warning signage for southbound motorists approaching the pedestrian crossing
Wider context from the report “At Haggerston Holiday Park, adjoining the east side of the A1 trunk road there are hundreds of caravans located and several hundreds of people come to stay and visit regularly. Access from public transport is by buses which also stop at various towns and villages along the A1 Trunk road. The road is the main strategic highway route between Scotland and England. The speed limit at Haggerston is 60 miles per hour and those travelling north on buses have to set down on the west side and cross both lanes of the A1 Trunk road traffic, through an unlit area to reach Haggerston. The visibility of pedestrians on the road for drivers travelling at up to 60 mph is restricted because of the need to use dipped headlights. There is no warning sign for motorists travelling south to alert drivers of pedestrians crossing the road . There is no central refuge for pedestrians crossing the road at the crossing point.
” Source location Samuel Eric Shaw · Prevention of Future Deaths report
Open source report
×
Source evidence
How this respondent position was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Warning signs and associated road markings have been in place on both approaches to the crossing since 2005.
Verbatim wording from the response “Your report indicates that there are no warning signs on the A1 southbound approach to Haggerston. I can, however, confirm that signs have been in place since 2005 comprising an ‘Accompanied Horses Crossing’ warning sign, an ‘Other Danger Ahead’ warning sign with ‘Pedestrians Crossing’ worded supplementary plate, on a bright yellow backing board. These signs exist on both the north and southbound approaches to the crossing location at appropriate distances from the hazard. These signs are associated with a SLOW road marking laid on a red coloured carriageway surface patch, to further highlight the hazard ahead. Please see Photograph 1 below.” Source location Response from Highways Agency
Open published response
×
Source evidence
How this respondent position was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Existing lighting and signing meet current standards, so no immediate action is required.
Verbatim wording from the response “I have concluded that the lighting and signing provision meets current standards and therefore no immediate action is required to address your concerns.” Source location Response from Highways Agency
Open published response
7 Feb 2014 John William GROOBY · Prevention of Future Deaths report Warwickshire
View report summary
Concerns raised 1
Lack of signage warning motorists of deer use of the area as a game track View source
×
AI-generated summary
John William GROOBY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.
Report summary
John William Grooby, a motorcyclist, died after being struck by a deer on the A3400 between Tredington and Shipston on Stour on 24 October 2013. The substantive concern was the lack of signage warning motorists that deer use the area as a “game track”.
Read the report on judiciary.uk
× Source evidence
How this individual concern was interpreted PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Lack of signage warning motorists of deer use of the area as a game track
Wider context from the report “(1) Lack of any signage to warn motorists that deer use this area as a “game track”.
” Source location John William GROOBY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
Open source report
×
Source evidence
How this respondent action was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Review evidence on deer collisions and assess the case for warning signs at the A3400 location.
Verbatim wording from the response “PC ████████ was notified by a colleague PC ████████ prior to the site visit, that there were records of non-injury related accidents along this stretch of road involving deer. PC ████████ had recorded 5 previous incidents since 2010. This information was new to the County Council, and informed officers of the tendency for deer to be present in the road at this location.” Source location 2014-0054-Response-by-Warwickshire-County-Council
Open published response
×
Source evidence
How this respondent action was interpreted
PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.
PFD Monitor interpretation Install two diagram 551 wild-animal warning signs on the A3400 section near the identified deer crossing location.
Verbatim wording from the response “Warwickshire County Council has reviewed the evidence supporting the Coroner’s view that action should be taken to prevent future similar deaths by introducing signs to warn motorists that deer use this area as a ‘game track’ and the decision has been taken to introduce signs on this section of the A3400. An instruction has been passed to the Council’s contractors to install two signs. These signs are in accordance with the Traffic Signs, Regulations and General Directions 2002, signs to diagram 551 “Wild animals likely to be in the road”.” Source location 2014-0054-Response-by-Warwickshire-County-Council
Open published response
Actions and positions describe what organisations say in published responses. Implementation is not independently verified.