Recurring concern

Unsafe medication administration

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 19 Sep 2013•Latest report 19 Mar 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of controls dedicated to the end-to-end administration of prescribed medicines, including staff competence and supervision, administration accuracy and timing, monitoring, verification of ingestion, access and stock control, documentation, and follow-up of missed or incorrect doses.

Not included

  • Excludes prescribing-only, medication-selection or clinical-review deficiencies where the concern is not tied to administration.
  • Excludes hazards involving counterfeit or unlawfully supplied medicines outside the administering organisation's medication-administration system.
  • Excludes generic record-keeping, staffing or training deficiencies that are not specifically dedicated to safe medication administration.
  • Excludes failures concerning unrelated information-sharing, assessment or care processes merely occurring in the same case.
Reports
115

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
147

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
192

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Care Quality Commission7
Stockport NHS Foundation Trust7
Department of Health and Social Care6
Ministry of Justice4
NHS England4
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust4
HM Prison and Probation Service3
Nursing and Midwifery Council3
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust3
Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust2
Care UK2
Hc-One Limited2
Leeds Prison2
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust2
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust2

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. County Durham and Darlington

    AI-generated summary

    Anthony Paul Nixon · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Anthony Paul Nixon, aged 45, was found deceased at his home on 12 June 2023 after a drug overdose involving a combination of substances. The report identified concerns that a pharmacy supplied additional doses of a controlled drug in advance and contrary to the supervised-consumption prescription, leaving him in possession of multiple doses without notifying his drug treatment provider. The inquest concluded that the death was drug related and that the pharmacy’s actions contributed more than minimally by supplying the additional doses.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide supervised doses of a controlled drug in accordance with the prescription's specified days and doses

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The Pharmacist in this case gave evidence that he believed that he had a discretion to provide ████████ in advance, and not in accordance with the prescription for supervised provision of ████████ on specific days, and maintained this was a “standard practice” when the Pharmacy was open for half a day on Saturdays. He interpreted the wording on the prescription namely “please dispense instalments due on a Pharmacy closed days on a prior suitable date” to include Saturdays when the Pharmacy was open for half a day, despite the prescriptions stipulating the specific days that the ████████ was to be provided, including specification of the dose each Saturday. (2) This led to a situation where the deceased was in possession of multiple doses of a controlled drug, namely ████████, on a regular basis in the period leading up to his death, which was not in accordance with the prescription, which had been carefully considered to attempt to manage the obvious risks of such. (3) The Pharmacy had been specifically chosen by the deceased’s drug treatment provider because it was able to provide supervised administration of ████████ on a 6 day per week basis and because in their assessment this was required to attempt to manage the risks inherent in the deceased having access to multiple doses. (4) The treatment provider were not alerted to the fact that the deceased was regularly receiving additional doses of ████████ not in accordance with the prescription they had issued, and so was unable to risk manage the suitability of the prescribing arrangements. (5) I was not reassured that the Pharmacist fully appreciates the gravity of this situation, and that in evidence he continued to maintain that he could exercise a discretion in relation to the provision of ████████, a controlled drug, and provide this not in accordance with specific prescription instructions on the days specified when the Pharmacy was open, and further that was described as a standard practice. (6) For the avoidance of doubt, the circumstances of this case have been alerted to the General Pharmaceutical Council, as the appropriate regulator, but there has been no update received as to whether an investigation has been undertaken or any action recommended. ”

    Source location

    Anthony Paul Nixon · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inspect the pharmacy’s governance and methadone dispensing arrangements against the Standards for Registered Pharmacies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of this, the pharmacy has recently been inspected by one of our inspectors, who looked for evidence that the pharmacy is meeting our Standards for Registered Pharmacies. The purpose of these standards is to create and maintain the right environment in pharmacies to protect and improve people’s health and wellbeing. The inspection included looking for evidence about the governance arrangements and the way the service for people taking methadone was being delivered. This was to ensure practices in the pharmacy, including supply of daily doses of methadone on days prior to the pharmacy being closed met the requirements of the prescriptions being dispensed. The Inspection report will be published in due course, showing some minor non-compliance and advice being given. Evidence collected during the visit to the pharmacy has been shared with our FtP colleagues.”

    Source location

    Response from General Pharmaceutical Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the Drug and Alcohol Service guidance, including checking supervised-consumption days on agreements and notifying the service of changes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have found the Durham County Council Drug and Alcohol Service Briefing Note: October 2024 helpful in this regard. This briefing describes the flexibility provided by the standard Home Office wording on FP10(MDA) prescriptions, describes changes to the Pharmacy Treatment Agreement and provides an update on how pharmacies can contact the service.”

    Source location

    Response from York Road Pharmacy
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ensure all pharmacy staff understand the guidance and required procedures through internal discussion and consideration.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have discussed these requirements internally and all staff are aware of the actions required and have considered the guidance fully. I have ensured that staff have fully understood the guidance and the steps we must take. The details of the”

    Source location

    Response from York Road Pharmacy
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 August 2024

    Open published response
  2. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Norman Leadbeater · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Norman Leadbeater, who had advanced Parkinson’s disease, vascular dementia and presumed liver cancer, developed aspiration pneumonia after being advised to have thickened fluids and died on 14 January 2024. Concerns were identified that his prescribed thickener was not listed on the Medication Administration Record and that his care plan lacked sufficient detail for staff to administer thickened fluids safely and correctly. A recommended audit of medication records had still not been completed four and a half months later, and no completion timescale was provided at the inquest.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record prescribed thickeners on Medication Administration Records

    Wider context from the report

    “Mr Leadbeater had been in receipt of domiciliary care from Evolve Services since October 2023. The care included the administration of medication. When a concern was raised that the carers had not been thickening fluids appropriately, the Community Commissioning Team at Bury Council undertook an investigation and found that the prescribed thickener was not listed on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and that the care plan in place for Mr Leadbeater did not contain sufficient detail for care staff to safely and correctly administer thickened fluids. In February 2024 and following its investigation into the concerns regarding Mr Leadbeater’s care, Bury Council Community Commissioning Team recommended that Evolve Services undertake a number of remedial actions. This included an immediate management audit of MAR for those service-users in receipt of medication support and liaison with GPs and Pharmacists to ensure that the medication listed for each service-user is up to date and accurate. The concern had that four and half months since the recommendation was made, Evolve Services have not yet completed the management audit of MAR for those service users in receipt of medication support. The representative from Evolve Services who attended the inquest was unable to provide the Court with a timescale for completion of this work or the number of service users this affects. ”

    Source location

    Norman Leadbeater · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit all service-user MAR sheets and continue regular audits after their return to the office.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since the Section 28 was issued to Evolve, the company have taken many remedial steps to address the content of your letter. The current RM has completed an audit of all MAR sheets for all the service users and the report is attached for your attention. Attachment 1”

    Source location

    Response from Evolve
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use printed MAR sheets supplied by the office or pharmacies to reduce medication errors.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Further to regular meetings with our Care Officer from Bury Adult services, ████████, and after meeting with the Medication Optimisation Team, ████████, as directed by ████████, all client MAR sheets are printed now, the introduction of printed MAR sheets, which will be from either the office or the chemist, this will reduce medication errors and ultimately provide better outcomes for service users. Refer to attachment 6”

    Source location

    Response from Evolve
    Page 5 · response
    Published 28 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inform staff about the inquest outcome, Section 28 requirements and resulting improvements to training, communication and MAR recording.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Staff were informed of the outcome of the Inquest, in particular, the Section 28 applicable and the changes that were required to improve our practices and they were kept aware of the need to improve training, communication and their recording on the MAR sheets. The above was discussed with the individual staff that attended to NL as well as in other staff meetings, where other matters were raised like accuracy of log”

    Source location

    Response from Evolve
    Page 5 · response
    Published 28 June 2024

    Open published response
  3. Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton

    AI-generated summary

    Shahida KHAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Shahida KHAN died on 17 December 2022 at Cloverdale Care Home after being given substantial quantities of prescribed medication, causing toxicity and respiratory depression. She had epilepsy and suffered three seizures immediately before her death. It could not be ascertained how she came to be given toxic and fatal quantities of medication, raising a concern about the risk of recurrence for other people in the care home.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Risk of administration of toxic and fatal quantities of medications to those in the care of staff

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The deceased was administered with toxic and fatal quantities of ████████, ████████ and ████████. It cannot be ascertained how this happened. 3. In the absence of an explanation there is a risk of a further recurrence where those in the care of the staff are administered toxic and fatal quantities of medications. ”

    Source location

    Shahida KHAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct a further investigation into medication storage, auditing and administration competencies at the care home.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to address your specific concerns and those matters which came to light at the inquest on 23 April 2024, specifically regarding medication levels found on postmortem, Voyage conducted a further investigation specifically focused on medication storage, medication audit and medication administering competencies at the care home where Ms Khan resided. This investigated confirmed:”

    Source location

    Response from Voyage Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review all residents’ care and care plans, including relevant rescue-medication administration protocols.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As previously stated, we have found no evidence of misadministration by our staff, having completed rigorous medication counts as part of our investigation. We have, however, taken a number of further steps to reduce the risk, insofar as is possible, of a Person We Support being administered toxic and fatal quantities of medications. These include:”

    Source location

    Response from Voyage Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Renew medication training for all staff at the care home.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “▪ We have reviewed the medication training in the home and are in the process of renewing medication training for all staff at the home.”

    Source location

    Response from Voyage Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Commission an independent pharmacist to review medication policies, procedures, training content and audits.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “▪ We have commissioned an independent pharmacist to review our policies, procedures, training content and audits. Whilst not as a direct result of this sad circumstance, it is relevant to our response as a reflective and responsible provider.”

    Source location

    Response from Voyage Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement an electronic Medication Administration System across the organisation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “▪ A further related action is the planned implementation of an electronic Medication Administration System across the organisation. This is part of a larger programme of work designed to provide more comprehensive oversight of the delivery of care to residents, including the administration of medication.”

    Source location

    Response from Voyage Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing medication storage, auditing, competency policies, procedures and staff training were considered robust and subject to audit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your concerns touch upon medication storage, medication audit and medication administering competencies. I can confirm that Voyage has established policies and procedures in place to deal with medication storage, medication audit and medication administering competencies, and these were in place at the time of Ms. Khan’s death. Extracts of these have already been provided to you. The policies and procedures are robust and are subject to audit. Staff are trained in all of the areas referred to both on induction and annually.”

    Source location

    Response from Voyage Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    No evidence was found that Voyage staff misadministered medication, following rigorous medication stock counts and investigation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As previously stated, we have found no evidence of misadministration by our staff, having completed rigorous medication counts as part of our investigation. We have, however, taken a number of further steps to reduce the risk, insofar as is possible, of a Person We Support being administered toxic and fatal quantities of medications. These include:”

    Source location

    Response from Voyage Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Further comment and decisions on steps addressing the concerns were constrained pending completion of the Police investigation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “is usually given to the People we Support by staff, the investigation by the Police will no doubt have to consider the possible involvement of third parties, for example other visitors to the service. We have confirmed to your office that the matter has been referred to the Police and, in those circumstances, I would respectfully request that this response should not be published until the Police have completed their investigation, to avoid any risk of compromising this. Until the Police complete their investigation it is difficult to comment further, and we will be advised by them as regards next steps including any steps which should be taken to address matters of concern at paragraph 5 of the PFD Report. In liaison with them, we will also take the steps necessary and appropriate, to manage staff, which may include suspension pending the conclusion of investigations.”

    Source location

    Response from Voyage Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response
  4. Northumberland

    AI-generated summary

    Eleanor Smith Deceased · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Eleanor Smith suffered an unwitnessed fall, sustaining a left femoral neck fracture, and underwent surgical repair. She developed an infection postoperatively and died in hospital on 24 September 2023. The principal concerns were a significant delay in administering intravenous antibiotics, whether the antibiotics were effectively administered, and whether the medical records accurately documented cannula placement and medication administration.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure effective administration of antibiotics

    Wider context from the report

    “1. It was the concern of the family throughout the investigation that there was a delay in the administration of IV antibiotics and the antibiotics were not administered effectively. The Trust accepted that there was a significant delay in the administration of antibiotics of a period of 24 hours but that it was unlikely that the delay affected the outcome. The family gave evidence that they were present until around 21.00 hours on 23 September 2023 and described difficulties experienced by staff on 23 September 2023 in the siting of a canula. There was an attempt for the canula to be placed in one arm, then the other and was eventually sited in the foot. It was the position of Trust that from 17.56 hours on 23 September 2023 there was a working cannula and prescribed medication was administered. I accepted the evidence of the family and I am concerned that the medical records did not accurately record the events and siting of the canula. I am further concerned as to whether prescribed medication on this occasion being antibiotics were effectively administered and what checks there are to ensure the effective administration of medicines. ”

    Source location

    Eleanor Smith Deceased · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create a Trust safety message covering difficult access, cannula documentation, partial-dose recording and eMeds amendments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are in the process of creating a safety message (see attached text and video) that will highlight:”

    Source location

    Response from Northumbria Healthcare
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create a step-by-step training video showing staff how to amend incomplete or partial doses in eMeds.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “From the evidence presented at Mrs Smith’s inquest although this facility is being used appropriately in many cases there are instances where this has not been done. Moreover, within the recorded amendments there are a significant number that have been recorded as either other (195) or blank (15), which does not provide sufficient clinical context. To address this gap, we have created a new training video for staff that demonstrates how to effectively use this facility in a step-by-step manner (see attached eMeds Amending Administration.mp4 in Concern 1).”

    Source location

    Response from Northumbria Healthcare
    Page 6 · response
    Published 29 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disseminate the safety message and videos Trustwide through multiple media, the intranet, email bulletin and digital newsletter.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The safety message and videos will be disseminated Trustwide via multiple media platforms, along with being shared on the Trust's intranet site and will also be sent to all staff by way of an email bulletin and on the communication digital newsletter. This will be sent separate to the normal safety message processes.”

    Source location

    Response from Northumbria Healthcare
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Amend MM01 to require immediate, reasoned recording of incomplete or partial medication doses.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In conjunction with this, Medicines Management Policies and Procedures (MM01) Version 9.3 has now been amended to reflect the importance of partial dose recording, including reasoning. The key changes to policy are detailed below and the amended policy is attached:”

    Source location

    Response from Northumbria Healthcare
    Page 6 · response
    Published 29 April 2024

    Open published response
  5. Norfolk

    AI-generated summary

    Kim Georgina STROUD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kim Georgina Stroud was admitted to hospital for a bladder tumour procedure that had previously been cancelled five times, became unwell with a chest infection and later tested positive for covid, and died suddenly on 11 October 2022. Concerns included medication being left unsupervised despite delirium, with tablets signed for as administered, and inadequate personal care when she was found heavily soiled with urine and faeces.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to accurately record medication administration

    Wider context from the report

    “Mrs Stroud’s care appears to have been non-compliant with both hospital policies and the Nursing and Midwifery Council regulations for the administration of medication. Mrs Stroud’s relatives found pots with tablets in on several occasions just left on their mother’s bedside table. These had been signed for as given. On one occasion Mrs Stroud had concealed 9 tablets inside her incontinence pads because she thought she was being poisoned, clearly not supervised in taking these either. It was extremely unsafe to give tablets in this way. Mrs Stroud had delirium and could not be left to take them herself. There were other confused and mobile patients on the same ward who could have picked them up. On several occasions Mrs Stroud was found in her bed so soaked in urine (I have seen photographs of this) that the urine was dripping off the edge of the bed and the family had to wash and change her themselves. Also wash faeces from her body. ”

    Source location

    Kim Georgina STROUD · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to safely administer and supervise medication for delirious patients

    Wider context from the report

    “Mrs Stroud’s care appears to have been non-compliant with both hospital policies and the Nursing and Midwifery Council regulations for the administration of medication. Mrs Stroud’s relatives found pots with tablets in on several occasions just left on their mother’s bedside table. These had been signed for as given. On one occasion Mrs Stroud had concealed 9 tablets inside her incontinence pads because she thought she was being poisoned, clearly not supervised in taking these either. It was extremely unsafe to give tablets in this way. Mrs Stroud had delirium and could not be left to take them herself. There were other confused and mobile patients on the same ward who could have picked them up. On several occasions Mrs Stroud was found in her bed so soaked in urine (I have seen photographs of this) that the urine was dripping off the edge of the bed and the family had to wash and change her themselves. Also wash faeces from her body. ”

    Source location

    Kim Georgina STROUD · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Apply the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework to assess incidents, identify learning and address wider patient-safety themes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Under the new Patient Safety Incident Response Framework (PSIRF), if an incident is brought to our attention, we now consider whether there is any learning to be taken from the incident, and review this in a number of different ways, rather than our investigation being guided by the level of harm or potential harm. If a patient safety risk is identified, under PSIRF we now look to identify wider themes to prevent future patient safety incidents, rather than focusing on an incident as an isolated event. If an incident such as this had been reported on Datix, depending on the issues identified at our initial review, we might look to review our medication round processes across the Trust. We might have identified an issue within a specific area, e.g. the ward itself, or we may be able to identify another root cause requiring a different approach.”

    Source location

    Response from The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn
    Page 4 · response
    Published 26 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reintroduce the Matrons’ Ward Assurance Toolkit across the Trust, including audits of safe medication storage and unattended bedside medicines.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Matrons’ Ward Assurance Toolkit has also been reintroduced across the Trust, providing guidance around what to look out for and audit tools to confirm compliance. This includes a Medicines Management audit which specifically asks the auditor to document whether medications have been stored safely, and in particular, whether any have been left on patient bedside cabinets or tables. A copy of this Toolkit is attached for your information.”

    Source location

    Response from The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn
    Page 5 · response
    Published 26 February 2024

    Open published response
  6. Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent

    AI-generated summary

    Joshua Ethan BURGESS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Joshua Ethan Burgess, who had epilepsy and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, died at home on 19 November 2022 after vomiting and aspirating during an epileptic seizure. The report identifies concerns about communication and prescribing processes for Brivaracetam, including failures to update the prescription, medication being withheld for several days, and a subsequent increase to 10ml twice daily despite information that 4ml twice daily was appropriate.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain a reliable written basis for Brivaracetam dosage administration

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The Neurology department of the Royal Stoke University Hospital operated a system whereby it did not instruct the prescribing GP to amend the prescription of Brivaracetam when changes to dosage had been agreed with Mr Burgess’ mother. The evidence from the Consultant Neurologist was that an assumption was made that when changes to medication had been discussed and agreed that Mr Burgess’ mother would attend the GP surgery to discuss the changes in medication. The same witness gave evidence that it was assumed a pharmacist within the GP surgery would read the correspondence from the neurology department and make the necessary changes to prescriptions without express instructions to do so. 2. The “workflow” within the Brook Medical Centre was such that letters sent from the Neurology department discussing changes in medication (albeit not containing a request to amend the prescription) were processed by support staff and not referred to a clinician to consider and so no changes were made to the prescription. 3. The letter of 27 July 2022 from the Neurology department to Brook Medical Centre seeking clarification as to the correct dosage of Brivaracetam was processed by support staff and a summary medications sent without referral to a clinician. 4. Godfrey Care were informed by Mr Burgess’ mother and the Neurology department of Royal Stoke University that the appropriate dose of Brivaracetam was 4ml twice daily. Medication was withheld between 22-26 July 2022 due to the information not being in writing from the prescriber, however the evidence at inquest was that 10ml twice daily was commenced on 26 July 2022 following a call to the 111 service. ”

    Source location

    Joshua Ethan BURGESS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review internal policies and procedures against the coroner’s concerns and identify necessary changes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Godfrey Care Response We intend to review our internal policies and procedures considering the coroners concerns and identify where changes need to be made. Below, we respond to the coroner’s areas of concern, setting out what we have already done, what we are doing now, and what we intend to do in the future.”

    Source location

    Response from Godfrey Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a local medication policy covering medication receipt, transcription, altered labels, missed doses, written prescribing confirmation and triangulation between prescribers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Reviewed Policies and Procedures The following actions will be implemented by 1st April 2024.”

    Source location

    Response from Godfrey Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update weekly and monthly managers’ medication audits to verify written authorisation, dosage changes and timely receipt of replacement prescriptions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Run through the reviewed managers monthly medication audit to ensure expectations are clear.”

    Source location

    Response from Godfrey Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update staff medication competency assessments to test clarification of unclear directions, MAR-label discrepancies and verbal medication changes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3 The Staff Medication Competency Assessment has been reviewed and now includes the following questions.”

    Source location

    Response from Godfrey Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 21 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The delay in administering medication did not contribute to the death.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. Whilst this concern is not directly addressed to the acute Trust (UHNM) or Brook medical Centre, it has been considered as part of the wider learning following Joshua’s death. Medications for epilepsy is considered across the healthcare economy to be ‘critical’. The National Patient Safety Agency (2010) defined critical medicines as ‘medicines which can result in patient death or serious harm if there are delays in their administration’. Whist the Coroner found that the delay in administering medications on this occasion did not contribute to Joshua’s death, we believe that further education within the care home setting is required. With this in mind, we will work together with the local authority to ensure that up to date communications are shared across the Stoke on Trent and North Staffordshire health and social care economy to reiterate this message.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals of North Midlands
    Page 4 · response
    Published 21 February 2024

    Open published response
  7. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Frances Ann NEWBURY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Frances Ann Newbury was found unconscious and not breathing at home on 20 May 2023 after reportedly taking drugs the previous evening; the inquest recorded acute poly drug toxicity, substance misuse disorder and chronic lung disease as the medical causes of death. The principal concern was that paramedics did not administer Naloxone despite being informed of illicit drug use and observing signs associated with drug use, which may affect outcomes in other cases.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to administer Naloxone to patients with an opiate misuse history when other potential reversible causes have been treated

    Wider context from the report

    “Despite paramedics being informed that Ms Newbury had taken illicit drugs the previous evening (albeit the report being of ████████) and obvious signs of ‘popping’ scars on her legs from ████████, Naloxone was not administered. Although in Ms Newbury’s case, it would have made no difference, I am concerned that in another case it may. This is not the first inquest in which I have queried why Naloxone has not been administered to patients (with a opiate misuse history) when all other potential reversible causes have been treated. ”

    Source location

    Frances Ann NEWBURY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Request a review of current JRCALC guidance on naloxone use in opioid-related cardiac arrest.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Overall the evidence base suggests that where cardiac arrest is established and confirmed from opioid use, naloxone has limited efficacy in reversing the cardiac arrest. The Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee (JRCALC) Clinical Practice Guidance advise the use of naloxone in cardiac arrest, noting that this has been unchanged and more recently the empirical reviews of the clinical evidence have been undertaken. I have asked that our Consultant Paramedics and Associate Clinical Directors who both are members of the JRCALC resuscitation group, request that a review is undertaken of JRCALC current guidance in light of the emerging clinical evidence, in respect of opioids.”

    Source location

    Response from London Ambulance Service
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 November 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide high-concentration naloxone on specialist Trust resources for cases involving potentially potent synthetic opioids.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “That said, the LAS is absolutely of the view that naloxone should be administered where a patient presents with respiratory depression and/or is peri (near) arrest, in this instance it is recognised to be lifesaving and we absolutely support its administration. In March 2022, the London Ambulance Service initiated the availability of high concentration naloxone on specialist resources utilised by the Trust. This was in recognition of the potential for highly potent synthetic opioids where stronger doses of naloxone may be required. We are also highly supportive of naloxone in community programs, for those where there is a high risk of overdose.”

    Source location

    Response from London Ambulance Service
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 November 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with agencies regularly contacting opioid users to improve naloxone availability.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “increasing the accessibility to public access defibrillators and trained responders and we are working with our agencies who have regular contact with opioid users around utility of naloxone to be available to them.”

    Source location

    Response from London Ambulance Service
    Page 4 · response
    Published 14 November 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Established cardiac arrest and absent immediate opioid-use evidence meant naloxone was not mandated and would not have changed the outcome.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst it is recognised that Ms Newbury had a long term history of opioid use, naloxone was not considered at the time of the cardiac arrest as there was no immediate history of opioid use and a clinically feasible cause of the arrest was identified, which was a current infection. The resuscitation attempt focused on high quality chest compressions and effective ventilation. It was recognised by the clinicians that naloxone would not have reversed the effects of ████████. The information reported to the clinicians at the time of attendance was that Ms Newbury had taken ████████ the previous evening.”

    Source location

    Response from London Ambulance Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 November 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    For confirmed cardiac arrest, standard resuscitation with high-quality compressions and ventilation should take priority over naloxone.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Asphyxia (deprivation of oxygen), through the respiratory depression (reduction in an individual’s breathing), develops and this leads to further cerebral hypoxia. Ultimately it is the hypoxia/hypercarbia which cause a diminishing cardiac output and may finally sadly result in a patient’s cardiac arrest. Where a patient is in cardiac arrest, there is immediate and ongoing artificial ventilation in an attempt to correct any ventilatory failure. Naloxone is a competitive antagonist (receptor site blocker) for the opioid and its administration aims to diminish the effects of the opioid, however, once a patient is in cardiac arrest (as opposed to respiratory arrest) the focus should be on high quality standard life support including artificial ventilation, chest compressions and adrenaline administration.”

    Source location

    Response from London Ambulance Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 November 2023

    Open published response
  8. East Riding and Hull

    AI-generated summary

    Tracey Elizabeth Rose · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Tracey Elizabeth Rose suffered a right tibial plateau fracture and was discharged with a recommendation for six weeks of dalteparin, but missed up to three doses because of a dispensing issue. She was later admitted with a confirmed pulmonary embolism and died on 25 January 2023 after an embolectomy; the concern was that the missed anticoagulant doses may have significantly contributed to the pulmonary embolism.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to administer the final inpatient dose of dalteparin

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) This woman was discharged home without her prescription of dalteparin being dispensed, also her last dose whilst in hospital may not have been given. Evidence was heard that missing up to three doses of this anticoagulant, in someone with increased risk factors for thromboembolic disease, may have significantly contributed to her developing a pulmonary embolism. ”

    Source location

    Tracey Elizabeth Rose · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Linda Oldland · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Linda Oldland died at Hydon Hill Nursing Home on 3 January 2022 from a urinary tract infection that infected both kidneys and resulted in sepsis. Concerns included failures to share information about positive urine tests and the GP’s treatment plan, delayed antibiotics, failure to recognise cardiac arrest, and incorrectly informing ambulance staff that a valid DNAR form was in place.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in starting stand-by oral antibiotics

    Wider context from the report

    “Hydon Hill Nursing Home: - Did not pass on pertinent information to the GP about the positive dip stick test on 30 December 2021; - Delayed the start of the stand-by oral antibiotics from the evening 31 December 2021 until Midday on 2 January 2022; - Did not pass on pertinent information to the ambulance service on 2 January 2022 about Mrs Oldland’s wishes and the GP plan should she deteriorate with suspected sepsis; - Did not recognise that Ms Oldland was in a state of cardiac arrest on 3 January 2022; - Incorrectly informed the ambulance service that Mrs Oldland had a valid DNAR in place on 3 January 2022. The Coroner considers that consideration ought to be given to updating policies and procedures in respect of the sharing and documentation of information relating to residents and/or in relation to training of clinical staff to address the above matters. ”

    Source location

    Linda Oldland · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 5 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Christine Mary Dickinson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Christine Mary Dickinson, who had follicular lymphoma and was receiving Rituximab, became gravely ill after a final hospital admission in October 2022 and died on 15 November 2022. The inquest raised concerns about multiple systems being used to record chemotherapy administration and the absence of a recent audit of record-keeping on the Laurel Unit, particularly after another patient’s details appeared in Mrs Dickinson’s record.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to use a single accessible system for recording chemotherapy administration

    Wider context from the report

    “1. During the course of the inquest, the court heard evidence that staff on the Laurel Unit previously used a variety of systems (including one system not routinely accessible by staff elsewhere in the hospital) to record the administration of Chemotherapy. 2. Whilst the Consultant Haematologist told the court the requirement to use a single method of recording administration of Chemotherapy has been reinforced, in view of the above together with the fact that details pertaining to another patient entirely appear to have been entered into Mrs Dickinson’s record from September 2022, it is a matter of concern that no recent audit has been undertaken in respect of record-keeping on the Laurel Unit. ”

    Source location

    Christine Mary Dickinson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Progress joint procurement of a consolidated electronic patient record through external approval and a planned formal procurement exercise.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A copy of this template is enclosed with this letter for your information. - The team have purchased three additional computers on wheels (rather than desk based computers) so nurses are able to complete their documentation at the side of a patient rather than leaving them to work elsewhere. This allows for more timely contemporaneous recording, especially when patients require close observation. - The Trust has established an electronic patient record (EPR) programme with the aim to procure and implement a single electronic patient solution to replace the majority of the Trust’s clinical systems. This programme is part of a national NHS digital initiative to ensure all Trusts have implemented such a solution by 2026 and associated funding has been made available to support Trusts.”

    Source location

    Response from Stockport NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing digital systems make chemotherapy and treatment information available to relevant staff for emergency care decisions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As referenced by ████████, the staff in Laurel Suite also view patient information in Evolve. Evolve is the Trust’s patient record scanning solution which is used to scan any paper records a patient may have. In the absence of an Electronic Patient Record (EPR) system, clinical information written on paper notes during an inpatient stay or outpatient appointment is then scanned into Evolve. This information can be viewed by all hospital staff (subject to appropriate access). Additionally, some key documents from AdvantisCDS are also sent into Evolve for example a patient’s Emergency Department attendance, test results or patient monitoring information. Laurel Suite staff used to record on paper a patient daily care record which was then scanned into Evolve. As stated above, this practice ceased in 2018, when the staff move to direct electronic recording into Advantis CDS.”

    Source location

    Response from Stockport NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The planned electronic patient record will not replace iQemo because its specialist nature requires it to remain in use.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A copy of this template is enclosed with this letter for your information. - The team have purchased three additional computers on wheels (rather than desk based computers) so nurses are able to complete their documentation at the side of a patient rather than leaving them to work elsewhere. This allows for more timely contemporaneous recording, especially when patients require close observation. - The Trust has established an electronic patient record (EPR) programme with the aim to procure and implement a single electronic patient solution to replace the majority of the Trust’s clinical systems. This programme is part of a national NHS digital initiative to ensure all Trusts have implemented such a solution by 2026 and associated funding has been made available to support Trusts.”

    Source location

    Response from Stockport NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026