Recurring concern

Unreliable recording and follow-up of clinical escalations

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 4 Apr 2024•Latest report 20 Jan 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in recording, completing, communicating, assigning or tracking clinical escalations and their resulting actions, including Nerve Centre escalation records and escalation-related handovers where the deficiency can leave follow-up unclear or incomplete.

Not included

  • Excludes generic clinical-record, handover or documentation failures where no clinical escalation or resulting action is involved.
  • Excludes failures in the clinical assessment or decision that prompted an escalation when the escalation-record and follow-up process itself is not deficient.
  • Excludes failures to implement actions after they have been clearly recorded, assigned and tracked through a reliable escalation process.
  • Excludes non-clinical operational escalations and generic incident-reporting processes unrelated to patient-care escalations.
Reports
2

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
3

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2024–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
4

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1
Doncaster Royal Infirmary1
Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. South Yorkshire (Eastern)

    AI-generated summary

    Dennis Keith Price · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Dennis Keith Price, a 71-year-old man, died on 28 October 2024 after falling while making his way unescorted to the toilet during a hospital admission. He suffered a subdural haemorrhage after the fall, and concerns included incomplete post-fall review, unclear neurological-observation instructions, and delays or failures in responding to Nerve Centre alerts.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to follow up Nerve Centre system escalation triggers

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The efficiency of the Nerve Centre system escalations in that any triggers must be followed up and properly completed on the system for the nerve centre system to be fully effective. ”

    Source location

    Dennis Keith Price · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to properly complete Nerve Centre system escalation records

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The efficiency of the Nerve Centre system escalations in that any triggers must be followed up and properly completed on the system for the nerve centre system to be fully effective. ”

    Source location

    Dennis Keith Price · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce Nerve Centre escalation procedures so triggers are actioned, followed up and fully documented, including the receiving clinician’s name and role.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust recognises the importance of the Nerve Centre system in supporting timely escalation and clinical decision-making and acknowledges the concern raised regarding the effectiveness of escalations where system triggers are not fully completed. Review of Mr Price’s care identified a documentation gap within Nerve Centre, specifically the absence of a recorded name confirming to whom the escalation was made, which limited assurance that the escalation process had been completed as intended. For the Nerve Centre system to function effectively, it is essential that all triggers are acted upon, followed up and fully documented, including clear identification of the clinician to whom concerns are escalated.”

    Source location

    2026-0037 - Response from Doncaster Royal Infirmary
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 January 2026

    Open published response
  2. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Tommy Jay Gillman · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Tommy Jay Gillman died on 8 December 2022 at Leicester Royal Infirmary after Salmonella Brandenberg meningitis caused sepsis and multi-organ failure. The report identified missed opportunities at Kings Mill Hospital, including delays in triage, escalation, monitoring, intravenous fluids and antibiotics. Concerns included insufficient paediatric nursing cover, undocumented handovers and an inadequate system for recognising and escalating the care of seriously ill babies.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to produce clear action plans and allocated tasks from handovers and escalations

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Handovers and key conversations between staff, both nursing and medical staff, in ED and with Paediatric staff are not routinely documented, and outcomes from handovers and escalations do not result in clear action plans and allocated tasks ”

    Source location

    Tommy Jay Gillman · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require paediatric triage documentation to confirm SBAR verbal handover and monitor compliance through monthly audit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation) is the recognised structure for communication and handing over patients for staff. The ED Registered Nurse local induction covers structured handovers and accountability handover and staff are provided with examples of how to use handover effectively. Whilst structured handovers must be used for any verbal handover there was no documentation requirement to confirm whether this had taken place at the time of Tommy’s attendance to the ED. The ED Paediatric triage document has been updated and nurses are now required to confirm an SBAR verbal handover has been provided:”

    Source location

    Response from Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 15 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use designated Tier 3-or-above doctors to oversee children’s care, reducing handovers and improving continuity.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “SBAR is also a recognised structure for medical handover and all Sherwood Forest clinical staff are required to utilise a structured handover to ensure effective and assertive communication. In addition, use of a structured handover ensures clear recommendations are provided, preventing ambiguity through encouraging clinical staff to repeat the information back to the provider to confirm understanding and allocation of tasks. In addition, changes to the medical model and provision of a designated Tier 3 (previously referred to as a Registrar or Middle Grade) or above Doctor to oversee the care of all children reduces the number of handovers required and improves the continuity of care.”

    Source location

    Response from Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 15 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and circulate the Children and Young People escalation tool, including triage-time triggers and required escalation actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Children and young people escalation tool.”

    Source location

    Response from Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 15 April 2024

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026