Recurring concern

Unreliable missing-person response

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 21 Aug 2013•Latest report 19 May 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of controls dedicated to the missing-person response, such as staff understanding of the procedure, risk classification, communication of status, searches, escalation, agency coordination and family notification.

Not included

  • Excludes generic delays in escalation or communication that are not explicitly connected to a missing-person response.
  • Excludes unrelated patient-deterioration, emergency-response or clinical-escalation failures.
  • Excludes general accessibility or communication deficiencies concerning visits, relatives or care unless they concern notification or coordination within a missing-person response.
Reports
45

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
75

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
112

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Metropolitan Police Service8
College of Policing7
Greater Manchester Police5
Department of Health and Social Care4
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust4
West Midlands Police4
East London NHS Foundation Trust3
Home Office3
National Police Chiefs’ Council3
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust3
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust2
NHS England2
North London NHS Foundation Trust2
Sussex Police2
Association Of British Neurologists1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Staffordshire South

    AI-generated summary

    Amanda Hawkins · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Amanda Hawkins, aged 44, had schizophrenia and experienced multiple moves to accommodation with reduced levels of care and changes in care co-ordination. She was last seen on 30 May 2014 and reported missing that evening; her naked, decomposed body was found on 22 July 2014, and the cause of death was unascertained. Concerns included increased vulnerability following the moves and inadequate follow-up of essential hospital appointments because care co-ordination workers were not informed of missed appointments.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to contact healthcare professionals during missing-person risk assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) When Amanda was reported missing she was classified as medium risk. No contact was made with her healthcare professionals. Had such contact been made earlier in the enquiry her risk profile may well have changed to high risk at an earlier point. This in turn may have led to a different approach in the search for her. ”

    Source location

    Amanda Hawkins · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The panel responsible for the funded care package, rather than the Trust, is responsible for developing risk assessments for prolonged absences from placements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is the Trust’s view that in cases where there is a history of patients spending a prolonged time out of the placement they reside in, it will be the responsibility of the panel responsible for the allocated funded package of care to develop a risk assessment. The risk assessment would aim to identify how the risk of the patient not returning to the placement could be mitigated and identify what further support can be provided to the patient to enable effective engagement with the community services in a safer and more supportive manner.”

    Source location

    2014-0516-Response-by-Dudley-Walsall-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 November 2014

    Open published response
  2. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    William Philip Hafele · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    William Philip Hafele, who had a history of mental ill health and alcohol dependence, was admitted to hospital after being found intoxicated and wanting to take his own life. After leaving the ward and being redesignated by police from missing to absent, no immediate enquiries were made; he was later found dead in a hotel room after suffocating using helium gas. The principal concerns related to inadequate training, risk assessment, communication, and understanding of responsibilities between the police and hospital staff.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of communication between police and hospital staff about missing-person status

    Wider context from the report

    “• Training procedures in respect of the police and hospital staff on Elgar Ward in the case of reports of missing persons and lack of understanding of areas of responsibility and appropriate actions. • Critical information required to make an informed risk assessment as to whether was missing or absent was omitted. • The decision to re classify from missing to absent was not communicated to the hospital • As a result no enquiries or investigations were made by any agency to ascertain Mr Hafele’s whereabouts • Adequate training on the Surrey Wide Response Agreement and Surrey Police Missing Person Procedure did not take place • In relation to the Police, specific training with regards to risk assessments for mental health patients was lacking • Surrey Police TPT briefing training did not correspond to the definition of Absent given in the Surrey Police Missing Person • Ineffective communications between Police and Elgar Ward ”

    Source location

    William Philip Hafele · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to make enquiries or investigations to ascertain a missing person’s whereabouts

    Wider context from the report

    “• Training procedures in respect of the police and hospital staff on Elgar Ward in the case of reports of missing persons and lack of understanding of areas of responsibility and appropriate actions. • Critical information required to make an informed risk assessment as to whether was missing or absent was omitted. • The decision to re classify from missing to absent was not communicated to the hospital • As a result no enquiries or investigations were made by any agency to ascertain Mr Hafele’s whereabouts • Adequate training on the Surrey Wide Response Agreement and Surrey Police Missing Person Procedure did not take place • In relation to the Police, specific training with regards to risk assessments for mental health patients was lacking • Surrey Police TPT briefing training did not correspond to the definition of Absent given in the Surrey Police Missing Person • Ineffective communications between Police and Elgar Ward ”

    Source location

    William Philip Hafele · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of adequate training for police and hospital staff on missing-person procedures, responsibilities and risk assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “• Training procedures in respect of the police and hospital staff on Elgar Ward in the case of reports of missing persons and lack of understanding of areas of responsibility and appropriate actions. • Critical information required to make an informed risk assessment as to whether was missing or absent was omitted. • The decision to re classify from missing to absent was not communicated to the hospital • As a result no enquiries or investigations were made by any agency to ascertain Mr Hafele’s whereabouts • Adequate training on the Surrey Wide Response Agreement and Surrey Police Missing Person Procedure did not take place • In relation to the Police, specific training with regards to risk assessments for mental health patients was lacking • Surrey Police TPT briefing training did not correspond to the definition of Absent given in the Surrey Police Missing Person • Ineffective communications between Police and Elgar Ward ”

    Source location

    William Philip Hafele · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the Force Missing Person Policy with NHS partners to address missing-person responsibilities and communication issues.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Force’s Missing Person Policy (MPP) is currently under review. The existing MPP, a policy jointly produced with NHS partners, is a comprehensive document setting out the way in which risk can be assessed and appropriate levels of responsibility:”

    Source location

    2014-0511-Response-by-Surrey-Police
    Page 1 · response
    Published 24 November 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue working with NHS and medical partners to establish effective communication channels and consistent responses to mental-health issues.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Force is committed to working with NHS and other medical partners to ensure effective channels of communication and consistent response and handling of mental ill health issues.”

    Source location

    2014-0511-Response-by-Surrey-Police
    Page 5 · response
    Published 24 November 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and implement a flow chart directing staff through enquiries after a person goes missing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A flow chart clearly outlining the process to make inquiries further to a missing persons report to the Police has been developed. It contains clear directions on the process that needs to be undertaken when someone has not returned to the ward. This standardisation of approach will support staff in making enquiries or investigations when a person using our services goes missing from the wards.”

    Source location

    2014-0511-Response-by-Surrey-Borders-Partnership-NHS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 November 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Emphasise and disseminate the MISPER process to ward staff and managers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have further emphasised the importance of the Missing Persons (MISPER) process to all our staff on these units, including making this a part of our improvement work in the reduction of the numbers of people who may be Absence Without Leave (AWOL). A member of the Clinical Assurance team is specifically assigned to wards with the view to ensure compliance with the MISPER agreement is tested.”

    Source location

    2014-0511-Response-by-Surrey-Borders-Partnership-NHS
    Page 1 · response
    Published 24 November 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require staff to complete and upload MISPER Appendix A information to RiO for missing-person reports.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Staff have been further clearly instructed to complete Appendix A of the MISPER agreement. This outlines details such as name and location of the unit reporting the missing person, the risk assessment zoning and clear justification for the category, personal details of the person who may have gone missing with an option to attach a”

    Source location

    2014-0511-Response-by-Surrey-Borders-Partnership-NHS
    Page 1 · response
    Published 24 November 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Arrange mandatory MISPER training for all unit staff, with completion required by the end of February 2015.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The MISPER agreement has been widely discussed in teams and presented at our managers meetings on a number of occasions. In addition mandatory training has now been arranged for all staff within the unit to be completed by the end of February 2015. To further ensure embedding of the process, we will now require our ward managers to undertake a quarterly audit on MISPER forms Appendix A & B and any emerging issues are discussed at our Acute Care Forum meeting.”

    Source location

    2014-0511-Response-by-Surrey-Borders-Partnership-NHS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 November 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement training and a familiarisation programme for police and mental-health or medical staff after completing the policy review.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Once the review of the MPP is complete, training and a familiarisation programme will be implemented for officers and mental health/medical staff (which may even include consideration for joint enterprise) to ensure that all staff understand and implement the policy and work effectively together to deliver successful outcomes for missing individuals.”

    Source location

    2014-0511-Response-by-Surrey-Police
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 November 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and enhance the Force training programme addressing missing-person procedures and mental-health risk assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The Force has in place a comprehensive program of training and is developing and enhancing this as an on-going matter.”

    Source location

    2014-0511-Response-by-Surrey-Police
    Page 3 · response
    Published 24 November 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The communication failure concerned notification of an absent classification, not mental health issues in the wider context.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “8. “Ineffective communications between police and Elgar Ward””

    Source location

    2014-0511-Response-by-Surrey-Police
    Page 4 · response
    Published 24 November 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The existing Missing Person Policy comprehensively provides risk assessment criteria and clearly allocates responsibility for enquiries.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Force’s Missing Person Policy (MPP) is currently under review. The existing MPP, a policy jointly produced with NHS partners, is a comprehensive document setting out the way in which risk can be assessed and appropriate levels of responsibility:”

    Source location

    2014-0511-Response-by-Surrey-Police
    Page 1 · response
    Published 24 November 2014

    Open published response
  3. Inner South London

    AI-generated summary

    Lauren Barfoot · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lauren Barfoot was a 14-year-old looked-after child who went missing from Micawber House on 22 June 2012 and was later discovered in the porch of her putative father’s home. The report identified concerns about failures to share information, classify the level of risk, conduct an effective search, and hold a timely strategy meeting. The inquest concluded that her accidental death was contributed to by failures in sharing information and pooling and using resources.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to classify a missing person as high risk when warranted

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) There was a failure by the MPS Missing Person's Unit (Greenwich) to carry out an effective search for Lauren as a consequence of the lack of information not shared with the Unit by those responsible for looking after and searching for Lauren, and therefore a missed opportunity for the Missing Person's Unit to classify Lauren as a “high risk missing person”. ”

    Source location

    Lauren Barfoot · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to carry out an effective search for a missing person

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) There was a failure by the MPS Missing Person's Unit (Greenwich) to carry out an effective search for Lauren as a consequence of the lack of information not shared with the Unit by those responsible for looking after and searching for Lauren, and therefore a missed opportunity for the Missing Person's Unit to classify Lauren as a “high risk missing person”. ”

    Source location

    Lauren Barfoot · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the response and existing measures against the inquest findings to ensure they address the identified issues and are embedded in current practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I enclose a report detailing our actions, addressing the specific issues of information sharing and risk assessment, but also our broader response to the serious case review that followed Lauren's death. I have caused our response to be reviewed in light of the inquest to ensure that those measures introduced following the serious case review account for the issues raised in your report and are fully embedded in current practice.”

    Source location

    2014-0385-Response-by-Metropolitan-Police
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 August 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete the Metropolitan Police missing-person reporting form when a child arrives.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Met Police Missing Person Reporting Form”

    Source location

    2014-0385-Response-by-Ethelbert-Childrens-Services1
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 August 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete and pass a vulnerability assessment to Kent Police for each child at placement.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Vulnerability Assessment”

    Source location

    2014-0385-Response-by-Ethelbert-Childrens-Services1
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 August 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Prepare risk assessment reports for missing looked-after children’s strategy meetings and pass them to police to inform search-risk and resource decisions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A risk assessment report is required in preparation for any strategy meetings for missing looked after children. A strategy meeting is held within three days of a child going missing. The social worker will provide a risk assessment report to the meeting in accordance with the Bexley Practice Guidance pro-forma for assessing risk. The meeting is chaired by the Independent Reviewing Officer for the child. The risk assessment report requires comprehensive information about all possible contacts and locations where the child may be found, including any information known about risks presenting to the young person. The risk assessment report will be passed to the police at the strategy meeting in order that they can assess the level of risk and resources required so that they can carry out an effective search for the missing young person.”

    Source location

    2014-0385-Response-by-Bexley-Borough-Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 August 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implemented information-sharing arrangements, vulnerability assessments, reporting forms and telephone notifications address concerns about missing children’s information and risk assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Once you have had an opportunity to review the action list we trust that you will find the steps that we have implemented, address concerns in respect of the collation of information as to the risk assessment of a child and contact details which can be shared with other agencies.”

    Source location

    2014-0385-Response-by-Ethelbert-Childrens-Services1
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 August 2014

    Open published response
  4. Buckinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Shaun Elliott · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Shaun Elliott, a vulnerable adult living in supported accommodation, went missing after an education outing and was later found in cardiac arrest. He died in hospital on 11 July 2011 after sustaining irreversible hypoxic brain damage; the recorded medical cause of death was acute bronchopneumonia due to multidrug use. Concerns included the availability of missing-person coordinators at weekends, family liaison, and the assessment of missing-person risk as high risk.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide effective family liaison during missing person enquiries

    Wider context from the report

    “(3)Family Liaison. Shaun’s family expressed a number of concerns and frustrations in this regard. However relevant to this report specific benefits could be derived from effective family liaison. Namely the family as a source of information together with the potential information sharing and cross referencing. ”

    Source location

    Shaun Elliott · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to apply the high-risk definition appropriately in missing person assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “(4).Application of definition of “ High Risk” in the context of missing persons. Shaun was assessed as medium risk until 21:00 hours on 10th July. At that time a Chief Inspector had reviewed the information on the database and applied an “enlarged” interpretation of the high risk definition. The evidence revealed that up to that time officers (Sergeants and Inspectors) considered that “High” risk could not apply in the absence of evidence of “Immediate” risk. The Jury concluded that the case should have been categorised as high risk on Saturday 9th July. These definitions are used nationally and are potentially part of our review. The concerns arising are around whether the definition could ( for example) be annotated or commented on to clarify when a less literal interpretation can be applied). ”

    Source location

    Shaun Elliott · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of missing person coordinator coverage at weekends

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The evidence revealed that a missing person coordinator was in post but not on duty at weekends. It was apparent from the evidence that an appropriately experienced coordinator will have the time and know-how to examine cases in fine detail. The officers directly responsible for the enquiry may have many other calls on their time. The IPCC report recommended there be cover 7 days a week. A senior police officer reported that this was under review and that other police forces were being contacted to see how they were addressing the issue. ”

    Source location

    Shaun Elliott · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. West Sussex

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Walker · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Walker, who had depression, suicidal ideation and a history of impulsive self-harm attempts, died after leaving the hospital ward and hanging himself in nearby woodland. Concerns included insufficient risk care planning, unexplained reductions in observation levels, the time taken to declare him missing and inform police, and the scalability of the ward’s external fences.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in declaring an AWOL patient missing and informing the police

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) Whilst it was accepted in evidence that the hospital's AWOL policy was robust and activated and implemented appropriately, concern was raised by the family with regard to the length of time taken before Mr Walker could be declared missing and the police informed. ”

    Source location

    Mr Walker · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The AWOL policy was implemented appropriately, including searching and contacting police after the patient was found missing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. AWOL Staff contacted the Police within 50 minutes of them noticing that Mr Walker was missing. This was after a full search of the ward, hospital, and hospital grounds was conducted, and after attempts were made to contact Mr Walker and his family. It was also the conclusion from our internal investigation that the AWOL policy was implemented appropriately.”

    Source location

    2013-0213-Response-by-Sussex-Partnership-NHS-Foundation-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 August 2013

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026