Failure to reliably recognise and assess domestic abuse risks
First to latest report 30 Oct 2013 — 19 Sep 2025
Reports that mention this concern
12
Times this concern has been raised
17
Stated actions linked to this concern
30
What this concern includes
Includes failures in domestic-abuse policies, flowcharts and operational risk-assessment arrangements to identify, understand or assess material abuse risks and risk factors, including non-fatal strangulation, cultural risk, coercive control and other indicators, where the deficiency affects safeguarding or protective action.
What is not included
Excludes the existing DASH-specific risk-assessment process when the assertion is confined to DASH forms, training or operation.
Excludes general domestic-abuse investigation, victim support or protective-order failures where risk recognition or assessment is not the unsafe condition.
Excludes generic police or healthcare training, communication or information-sharing deficiencies without a direct domestic-abuse risk-assessment connection.
Excludes isolated domestic-abuse incidents or outcomes where no continuing deficiency in risk recognition or assessment is asserted.
Trends
Reports over time
Reports mentioning this concern, over time
Reports about this concern issued each year.
* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.
Most frequent recipients
Most frequent recipients
Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.
Home Office4
Ministry of Justice3
National Police Chiefs’ Council3
Department of Health and Social Care2
Greater Manchester Police2
College of Policing1
Crown Prosecution Service1
Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership1
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust1
HM Prison and Probation Service1
Independent Office for Police Conduct1
Lancashire Constabulary1
Metropolitan Police Service1
Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust1
National Offender Management Service Equality, Rights and Decency Group1
Police force7
Ministerial department5
National policing body3
NHS trust2
Clinical commissioning group1
English metropolitan district council1
English unitary authority1
Executive agency1
Health-system partnership1
Integrated care board1
Multi-service care provider1
Non-ministerial department1
Police oversight body1
Sub-organisation1
Reports and published responses 12 reports
See individual reports that have raised this concern, and the actions taken in response
Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin
Concerns raised1
Failure to refer and assess an adult at risk as a vulnerable adult or victim of domestic violence
This report raised 2 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked responses
NHS Telford and Wrekin Clinical Commissioning Group
West Mercia Police
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.4
NHS Telford and Wrekin Clinical Commissioning Group
Recirculate the Adult Safeguarding Policy and Thresholds to all Telford and Wrekin GP practices.
NHS Telford and Wrekin Clinical Commissioning Group
Distribute domestic abuse leaflets and guidance to all Telford and Wrekin GP practices.
NHS Telford and Wrekin Clinical Commissioning Group
Fund and deliver a multi-agency safeguarding and domestic abuse education event for Telford and Wrekin GPs and practice nurses.
West Mercia Police
Provide all operational staff with a reminder to complete DASH, crime reports and vulnerable adult documentation.
Respondent positions A position is what a respondent says about the concern when they do not describe a specific action.2
West Mercia Police
Existing DASH training, policies, procedures and auditing are considered sufficient for domestic violence responses.
Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
West Mercia Police
Recognising vulnerable adults is considered sufficient to trigger referral for specialised assistance, without individualised dementia training.
Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
Liverpool
Concerns raised1
Failure to identify domestic abuse risk factors during prison reception and risk assessment
This report raised 3 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
No linked response statements
No respondent-stated action or position is linked to these concerns in the published data.
Actions and positions describe what organisations say in published responses. Implementation is not independently verified.