Recurring concern

Failure to ensure care staff can communicate effectively with residents and patients

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 27 Oct 2014•Latest report 18 Jun 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in direct care-staff communication with residents or patients that impair understanding of instructions, expression of needs, recognition of risks or safe delivery of care, including agency staff and communication with highly vulnerable patients.

Not included

  • Excludes generic organisational communication, inter-agency information sharing and professional-to-professional handover failures where direct communication between care staff and residents or patients is not the unsafe condition.
  • Excludes interpreter-access, translation-service and multilingual communication failures where the principal deficiency is provision of language support rather than the care staff's direct communication capability.
  • Excludes failures limited to communicating policies or protocols to staff, or to patient-facing letters and appointment notices, when direct care interaction is not deficient.
  • Excludes generic staffing, training or English-language deficiencies unless they directly impair safe communication between care staff and residents or patients.
Reports
13

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
13

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
24

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care3
Care Quality Commission2
1st Care 4U Ltd1
Ashford and St Peter'S Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1
Barts Health NHS Trust1
Boldmere Court Care Home1
Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1
East London NHS Foundation Trust1
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust1
HM Prison and Probation Service1
HM Prison Service1
Holcroft Grange1
Mersey and West Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust1
Minster Care Management Limited1
Southport and Ormskirk Hospital NHS Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Cheshire

    AI-generated summary

    Margaret Elizabeth DOUGLAS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Margaret Elizabeth Douglas suffered recurrent falls, a subdural haemorrhage, worsening stroke symptoms and increasing frailty while receiving care, and died after a further deterioration at Holcroft Grange. Concerns included accepting her into care despite being unable to provide the required one-to-one supervision, and using carers whose understanding of her complex needs and ability to communicate effectively were questioned, particularly given her risk of aspiration.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of one-to-one carers to communicate effectively with individuals who have speech difficulties

    Wider context from the report

    “ii) In the course of the Inquest I heard evidence from the individual who was caring for Elizabeth on the morning of her death and in the course of that evidence it became apparent that the carer had little understanding of Elizabeth’s needs and had difficulty communicating and understanding information in English. The evidence given by those at Holcroft Grange was that they outsourced the provision of the one to one carers to a company, '1st Care 4 U Ltd' who had been approved for use by their parent company 'Minster Care Group'. At the time the care was provided, it was known by those responsible for sourcing the care, that there were difficulties with Elizabeth’s communication and complex needs. This evidence gives rise to significant concerns in respect of the ability of those providing one to one care to understand an individual’s complex needs and their ability to communicate with those who themselves have difficulties with their speech. The concerns were heightened in the context of this case given that Elizabeth was at high risk of aspiration and if carers are unable to understand the complexities of an individual’s needs and communicate effectively with them, it poses a risk to their life. ”

    Source location

    Margaret Elizabeth DOUGLAS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require staff engaged by the service to complete the IELTS exam before working on site.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to ensure that any staff engaged by Holcroft Grange have an appropriate understanding of residents’ care needs, we ensure that they have completed the International English Language Test (IELTS) exam. This forms part of our introductory checklists and paperwork prior to staff members working on our premises.”

    Source location

    Response from Minster Care Group
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Assess overseas agency workers’ spoken and written English at each shift and exclude those with inadequate proficiency from working on site.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1) Our organisation will ensure that all overseas workers that attend our services via agencies have a competent understanding of the English language, both spoken and written. This will now be assessed by the person in charge of each shift to ensure that the command of the English language is good. Where it is deemed “inadequate” the staff member will not be allowed to work on site.”

    Source location

    Response from Minster Care Group
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide written care descriptions and relevant care-plan information during handovers to irregular staff, alongside verbal handover and electronic access.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3) Handover of care between staff will be enhanced to ensure that any irregular staff ie Agency carers, have a written description of the issues and conditions that a person may exhibit. In addition to verbal handovers from the relevant staff members, written descriptions of the care plans will now be provided at the start of the shift. Information contained in the handover is also provided on handheld electronic devices that are given to all staff, and this information can also be easily updated at any given time.”

    Source location

    Response from Minster Care Group
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 July 2025

    Open published response
  2. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Abdirahman Afrah · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Abdirahman Afrah developed severe chest pain and attended A&E, but left without being seen by a doctor after a prolonged wait. He later collapsed at home and died in hospital on 4 June 2024 from bleeding caused by a pulmonary vascular malformation. The concerns included prolonged A&E waits, lack of timely medical triage, unclear communication about the urgency of returning to hospital, failure to discuss this directly with a responsible parent, and failure to send results to his GP in time.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to clearly communicate the risk of not returning to hospital

    Wider context from the report

    “3. When the doctor called Abdirahman the following afternoon, she did not have all of the relevant clinical information to hand. She was not aware of the compensated metabolic acidosis. It is unlikely that she advised Abdirahman of the importance of returning to the hospital. It is foreseeable that patients may be reticent to return to A&E, because of the lengthy waits, so doctors making the call to patients who have left, should be fully informed about the clinical condition and risks. The risk of not returning should be made very clear. ”

    Source location

    Abdirahman Afrah · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update and formalise the Left Without Treatment policy covering patient risk advice, under-18 safeguards and urgent clinical information sharing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The responses will be delivered in an updated ‘Left Without Treatment’ (LWOT) policy (drafted and waiting formal review and stakeholder approval) and an immediate safety bulletin which will be actively shared to all staff groups in the Emergency Department. This will be shared electronically, and daily at in-person handovers to reach as many staff as possible to effect immediate change in practice. More detail is included in each section.”

    Source location

    2025-0245- Response from Barts Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 May 2025

    Open published response
  3. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Bernard Lyon · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Bernard Lyon, who had dysphagia and was living at Hyde Nursing Home, developed sepsis and aspiration pneumonia and died at Tameside General Hospital on 30 January 2024. The report describes concerns about the nursing home's management capacity, staffing and adherence to his modified diet plan, as well as multi-agency oversight, communication with families, ambulance handover delays and delays in administering antibiotics in a very busy emergency department.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of agency staff to communicate effectively in English with residents and colleagues

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The home relied on agency staff who the inquest was told struggled to have sufficient grasp of the English language to understand instructions given and to communicate with residents. ”

    Source location

    Bernard Lyon · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Seek evidence that providers using agency staff have verified their training, skills and command of English.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Where CQC identify that agency staff are being employed, we will seek evidence that the registered provider has carried out due diligence to be satisfied that the staff have been suitably trained and have the requisite skills, including command of English. Where we find this is not the case, we will raise this with the provider and this may constitute a breach of the regulation, with associated regulatory action.”

    Source location

    Response from CQC
    Page 4 · response
    Published 16 April 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish guidance for social care providers on international recruitment and assessing care workers’ English-language competence.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To support providers, the department published the ‘International recruitment toolkit for social care providers’ (International recruitment toolkit - March 2024), outlining the English language requirements and steps employers should take during the recruitment process to ensure care workers have the correct level of English language competence.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 16 April 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement more robust contract monitoring processes and quality visits across care homes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have undertaken a review of the Commissioning Team structure and increased the number of quality monitoring officers. We are implementing more robust contract monitoring processes and quality visits to ensure we are working with all the homes more closely. This will identify any issues that may arise in relation to staffing, recruitment and language barriers.”

    Source location

    Response from Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 16 April 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The care provider is responsible for assessing agency staff’s English proficiency and ensuring their suitability for the role.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Furthermore, there are immigration routes which permit individuals to work in the UK without needing to seek approval from the Home Office and do not have an English language requirement. Care providers are therefore responsible for ensuring that the individual speaks and reads to the standard required for the job.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 16 April 2025

    Open published response
  4. West London

    AI-generated summary

    Tom Sweeting · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Tom Sweeting experienced a sudden deterioration in his mental health in August 2021 and was assessed by liaison psychiatry after reporting suicidal thoughts. On 20 August 2021, he was found suspended by a ligature at home after locking himself in the garage, and resuscitation attempts were unsuccessful. Concerns included incomplete clinical assessment documentation, failures in discharge communication and treatment-plan communication, delegation of family collateral information gathering to a junior trainee, and a lack of evidence that new training and procedures had been effectively audited.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate treatment plans effectively to patients

    Wider context from the report

    “2. No letter of discharge was sent at the time Tom was seen by the liaison psychiatry team, and a letter was only generated in response to investigations taking place after the death. The team acknowledged that there were “problems” with sending out letters at the time, and no evidence was brought before the court that this issue has now been resolved. Letters should be dispatched within 24 hours of attendance. Communication between the various community teams and setting out the treatment plan to the patient are important factors that were not effective during Tom’s care and remain a concerning omission where there may be a simple and effective remedy. ”

    Source location

    Tom Sweeting · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Liverpool and the Wirral

    AI-generated summary

    Eva Hayden · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Eva Hayden, aged four, developed neutropenia following an illness and later became seriously unwell with fever-like symptoms. She collapsed on 10 January 2020 and died in the emergency department on 11 January 2020; the inquest found sepsis and bone marrow hypoplasia. Concerns included missed follow-up of her neutropenia, inadequate communication between hospitals, and insufficient communication with her parents about infection risks.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate treatment plans and condition-related risks to patients and confirm their understanding

    Wider context from the report

    “a) When investigating, diagnosing or treating a patient’s presentation it seems reasonable that there should be good communication between clinician and patient with regard to the treatment plan. Understanding of the patient should be confirmed with regard to any precautions or risks arising from the condition. In this matter, Eva’s parents had no knowledge of the pancytopenia or neutropenia under investigation and the risks of infection for Eva – such that this was not explained to the staff in the Emergency department at Alder Hey on 8th January 2020. Clinical practice should have prevented this eventuality. ”

    Source location

    Eva Hayden · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Re-emphasise communication with families and documentation of discussions through clinical-team meetings and regular communications, including providing relevant letters.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. The importance of ensuring clear communication with parents and/or children about conditions that are being investigated and the documentation of these conversations in the case note or electronic system has been re-emphasised to all clinical teams through staff meetings and regular communications. We provide copies of discharge letters and outpatient department”

    Source location

    2021-0147-Response-from-Southport-and-Ormskirk-Hospital-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit communication documentation and the quality of recorded clinical information through a routine audit cycle.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “clinic letters to parents. This will be followed up through a routine cycle of audits which will commence in July 2021 to ensure adherence to this directive and additionally to assess the quality of clinical information that is being recorded. We are working closely with Alder Hey team to ensure that families transferred from Alder Hey to Ormskirk for ongoing investigations have an understanding of the reasons and plans.”

    Source location

    2021-0147-Response-from-Southport-and-Ormskirk-Hospital-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop standardised communication and referral processes with Alder Hey and the wider paediatric network, particularly for shared-care arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “clinic letters to parents. This will be followed up through a routine cycle of audits which will commence in July 2021 to ensure adherence to this directive and additionally to assess the quality of clinical information that is being recorded. We are working closely with Alder Hey team to ensure that families transferred from Alder Hey to Ormskirk for ongoing investigations have an understanding of the reasons and plans.”

    Source location

    2021-0147-Response-from-Southport-and-Ormskirk-Hospital-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Amend paediatric staff induction to cover communication with families, communication with other organisations, and responses when children are not brought to appointments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “10. The circumstances and details of this case have been widely shared. In addition, we are amending the local induction for staff in paediatrics to ensure that staff are provided with important information about the requirements of:”

    Source location

    2021-0147-Response-from-Southport-and-Ormskirk-Hospital-Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 18 May 2021

    Open published response
  6. Manchester City

    AI-generated summary

    Tomasz Nowosad · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Tomasz Nowosad was found hanging by a ligature in an ordinary, non-safe cell at HMP Manchester on 2 February 2017, shortly after being transferred from the healthcare centre. The report identifies concerns about risk assessment, including reliance on his denials of suicidal thoughts, incomplete and delayed clinical records, inconsistent use of interpretation services, and his transfer to an ordinary wing despite expressed fears and mental health risks. The inquest jury concluded that the death was suicide contributed to by neglect.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inappropriate minimisation of prisoners’ illness or vulnerability during transfer decisions

    Wider context from the report

    “5 16 It is suggested that it is not appropriate to indicate to a patient prisoner that they are not so ill or vulnerable as others in considering a move out of the HCC because that may influence their cooperation and disclosure of their symptoms and presentation It is suggested that guidance is issued to GMMH staff about this ”

    Source location

    Tomasz Nowosad · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 7 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The healthcare provider is responsible for responding separately to concerns about clinical issues.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am grateful to you for bringing to my attention a number of matters of concern, many of which are relevant across the prison estate. I have consulted with the Governor of HMP Manchester and, where relevant, will mention action that has been taken locally at the prison as well as work that is taking place at national level. I understand that the healthcare provider is responding separately to your concerns about clinical issues.”

    Source location

    2019-0445-Response-from-HMPPS
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 January 2020

    Open published response
  7. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Julie Ann Barrow · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Julie Ann Barrow, who had significant learning disabilities, was admitted to hospital on several occasions for perianal pain, rectal bleeding and haemorrhoids. Following treatment for adjustment disorder and significant sedation, she fell at her family home on 1 April 2019, sustained an unsurvivable brain injury and died in hospital the next day. The principal concerns included the absence of a best interests meeting and reasonable adjustment care plan, ineffective communication and understanding of her needs, inadequate support for her parents, and the loss of the learning disability liaison role.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate effectively with the patient and understand her needs

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Julie Ann Barrow was cared for devotedly in hospital by her parents who are in their 80s. Their evidence to the inquest was that Julie was never effectively communicated with by clinicians treating her and her needs not understood. So far as her needs were concerned she was “invisible” to staff. An approach that recognised just how traumatic a hospital stay and medical treatment was for her would have significantly reduced the trauma that led to her developing adjustment disorder. The consultant psychiatrist who gave evidence to the inquest was very clear that the pain and trauma of the hospital stays had caused the acute adjustment disorder; ”

    Source location

    Julie Ann Barrow · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Consult on introducing mandatory learning disability and autism training for health and care staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Local LeDeR reviews have also demonstrated that health and social care staff do not always have the skills and knowledge to provide effective, compassionate and safe care to people with learning disabilities. For this reason, we have consulted on the introduction of mandatory learning disability and autism training for health and care staff.”

    Source location

    2019-0325-Response-from-The-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 8 November 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish proposals for training health and social care staff consistently with the two Core Capability Frameworks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the Government’s response to the consultation⁴, published on 5 November 2019, we set out a series of proposals that will ensure that health and social care staff will, over time, receive training consistent with the Core Capability Frameworks for People with a Learning Disability and Supporting Autistic People⁵.”

    Source location

    2019-0325-Response-from-The-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 8 November 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with professional bodies and devolved Administrations to align pre-registration training with the Core Capability Frameworks and develop a common curriculum.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “These Frameworks set out the core skills and knowledge that staff supporting people with a learning disability or autism should have, depending on the nature and intensity of care or support they give. This will ensure that staff have the skills and knowledge that are appropriate to their role. In this regard, we will work with professional bodies and the devolved Administrations to align pre-registration training as closely as possible with the two Core Capability Frameworks and work towards a common curriculum for pre-registration training in due course.”

    Source location

    2019-0325-Response-from-The-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 8 November 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop, test and evaluate a Tier 2 learning disability and autism training package to inform final design and wider rollout.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “For Tier 2 training we will develop and test a learning disability and autism training package through 2020/21 in a number of geographical and service settings. We will undertake an evaluation of the training package to inform the final design of training and wider roll out.”

    Source location

    2019-0325-Response-from-The-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 8 November 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Amend regulations to require regulated health and social care providers to ensure staff receive relevant learning disability and autism training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To mandate the training, we will amend the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014⁶, to require NHS and social care providers carrying out regulated activities to ensure that their staff have relevant levels of training in learning disability and autism. Other levers will be used to mandate training for staff working in non-regulated activities.”

    Source location

    2019-0325-Response-from-The-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 8 November 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use additional mechanisms to mandate learning disability and autism training for staff working in non-regulated activities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To mandate the training, we will amend the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014⁶, to require NHS and social care providers carrying out regulated activities to ensure that their staff have relevant levels of training in learning disability and autism. Other levers will be used to mandate training for staff working in non-regulated activities.”

    Source location

    2019-0325-Response-from-The-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 8 November 2019

    Open published response
  8. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Mrs Alice Doris Dixon · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Alice Doris Dixon attended St Peter’s Hospital for investigation of anaemia and shortness of breath and suffered an anaphylactic shock during a CT scan involving injected contrast dye. She was admitted to intensive care, later treated palliatively, and died from the consequences of the shock. Concerns included inadequate support and communication during consent, incomplete and unclear consent documentation, lack of clinical assessment immediately before the scan, missing information about vulnerabilities, and difficulty observing or hearing her breathing difficulties during the scan.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of communication training and communication resources for language difficulties

    Wider context from the report

    “7. The radiographer who filled in the form had no training in communication or language difficulties and there were no other resources to aid communication and the questions were yes/no. ”

    Source location

    Mrs Alice Doris Dixon · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Bedfordshire and Luton

    AI-generated summary

    ANDREW STUART CODLING · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Andrew Stuart Codling, aged 39, was found hanging at Old Warden Tunnel Woods near Cardington, Bedfordshire, on 26 November 2016. He had previously attempted suicide and was under the care of the Biggleswade Community Health Team. Concerns were raised about the content and timing of the Team’s final call, including that it did not reinforce the availability of other sources of help before Monday morning.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate the availability of alternative support before Monday morning

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) That call missed the opportunity to re-inforce the fact that there were other means of help should the deceased require it, including the crisis numbers already provided by the Service. (4) Reminding the deceased that there was provision to provide support before Monday morning may have been all the deceased required to avoid taking the decision to hang himself particularly, bearing in mind it was the deceased who had initiated the call ”

    Source location

    ANDREW STUART CODLING · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and implement a CMHT protocol governing mobile-phone communication and requiring staff to provide urgent-support contacts when service users do not answer calls.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to the concerns raised, a new protocol has been developed and implemented within the CMHTs. The protocol provides guidance to staff in relation to the use of mobile phones in communication with service users. Where a member of staff provides a service user with their mobile phone number an explanatory letter is now provided. This includes information on who can be contacted should the call not be answered, depending on the nature of the call and what assistance is required.”

    Source location

    2017-0339-Response-by-East-London-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 December 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide service users with an explanatory letter, including alternative contact arrangements, whenever staff give them a mobile-phone number.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to the concerns raised, a new protocol has been developed and implemented within the CMHTs. The protocol provides guidance to staff in relation to the use of mobile phones in communication with service users. Where a member of staff provides a service user with their mobile phone number an explanatory letter is now provided. This includes information on who can be contacted should the call not be answered, depending on the nature of the call and what assistance is required.”

    Source location

    2017-0339-Response-by-East-London-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 December 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust considers that its action adequately addresses the concern and that no further safety work is necessary.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I hope that the action taken provides you with assurance that the Trust has taken appropriate action and that your concern has been adequately addressed.”

    Source location

    2017-0339-Response-by-East-London-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 December 2017

    Open published response
  10. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    David Sheppard · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    David Sheppard choked on a doughnut at Boldmere Court on 31 July 2016 and suffered a cardiac arrest and severe hypoxic brain injury. He was taken to Good Hope Hospital, where treatment was withdrawn, and he died on 3 August 2016. The principal concerns were inadequate emergency response, poor communication, failures in record keeping, insufficient first-aid training, and inadequate post-event investigation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of staff to communicate effectively with challenging behavioural unit patients

    Wider context from the report

    “c. The patients on the challenging behavioural unit are extremely vulnerable and many suffer from dementia and other conditions. Staff being unable to communicate effectively with these patients may cause harm and confusion. ”

    Source location

    David Sheppard · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Language testing is not required for non-regulated care workers, although employers must ensure they can communicate effectively.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There is no requirement for language testing non-regulated workers, such as care staff. However, social care employers are responsible for ensuring that their staff are trained and competent for the tasks they are recruited to do. This includes the ability to communicate effectively.”

    Source location

    David-Sheppard-Response
    Page 3 · response
    Published 10 July 2017

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026