Recurring concern

Unreliable hospital discharge processes

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 30 Jan 2013•Latest report 10 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in hospital discharge planning, readiness decisions, multidisciplinary or receiving-service coordination, safety planning, execution and directly required follow-up.

Not included

  • Inter-hospital patient transfer where no discharge from hospital care occurs
  • Failures in treatment after a safe and complete discharge
  • Generic care coordination unrelated to a hospital discharge process
  • Delays in admission or movement within hospital before discharge is being planned
Reports
273

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
406

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
524

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care48
NHS England20
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust9
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust8
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust8
Barts Health NHS Trust7
Care Quality Commission7
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust7
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board6
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust6
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB5
Kent and Medway Mental Health NHS Trust5
Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust5
Royal London Hospital5
Stockport NHS Foundation Trust5

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. West Yorkshire Western Division

    AI-generated summary

    Denton Donovan DUHANEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Denton Donovan Duhaney was admitted to hospital with physical and mental health concerns and was assessed as being at high risk of further mental health deterioration. He self-discharged without assessment by the hospital’s in-house psychiatric team or notification to the community treatment team, and was found dead at home several days later; the recorded cause of death was hanging (asphyxia), with a conclusion of suicide. The substantive concerns included failures in psychiatric assessment, discharge protocol, communication about the self-discharge, and follow-up arrangements.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to adhere to the hospital discharge protocol for self-discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Pinderfields hospitals discharge protocol does not appear to have been adhered to when Mr Duhaney expressed a wish to self-discharge. ”

    Source location

    Denton Donovan DUHANEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The discharge protocol was implemented by Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust, so this respondent will not respond to that concern.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The above relates to the discharge protocol implemented by Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust. We do not propose responding to this concern.”

    Source location

    2021-0200-Response-from-Fieldhead-Hospital_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 June 2021

    Open published response
  2. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Juliet Saunders · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Juliet Saunders, a 25-year-old woman with Cornelia De Lange Syndrome and a profound learning disability, attended hospital on 7 March 2020 with abdominal pain and vomiting and died at home the following day. The report identified concerns including misinterpretation of abdominal x-rays, failure to diagnose intestinal obstruction, inadequate escalation and supervision, departures from transfer and discharge procedures, lack of safety-netting advice, and insufficient support for patients with learning disabilities at weekends.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Absence of safety-netting advice for patients leaving the hospital

    Wider context from the report

    “7. The absence of safety-netting advice to patients leaving the hospital. ”

    Source location

    Juliet Saunders · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Launch a patient-designed discharge safety-netting leaflet after final approval and printing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A discharge leaflet has been designed in partnership with patients which provides information on discharge. This will be launched shortly once the final approval has been signed off and the leaflet has returned from the printers. In addition to the leaflet, the Emergency Department are trialling a Discharge Helpline this is planning to launch from Monday 12th July and will provide a number to call if they have any queries after discharge. There is a draft SOP for the 2 month pilot period.”

    Source location

    2021-0157-Response-from-Queens-Hospital_Published
    Page 5 · response
    Published 18 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Launch and weekly-audit a two-month Emergency Department discharge helpline pilot.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A discharge leaflet has been designed in partnership with patients which provides information on discharge. This will be launched shortly once the final approval has been signed off and the leaflet has returned from the printers. In addition to the leaflet, the Emergency Department are trialling a Discharge Helpline this is planning to launch from Monday 12th July and will provide a number to call if they have any queries after discharge. There is a draft SOP for the 2 month pilot period.”

    Source location

    2021-0157-Response-from-Queens-Hospital_Published
    Page 5 · response
    Published 18 May 2021

    Open published response
  3. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Alan Massam · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Alan Massam, a resident with dementia, had repeated falls after moving to a dementia residential home and was twice admitted to hospital. After a traumatic brain bleed and rib fractures were identified, he deteriorated and died in hospital on 24 October 2019. Concerns included inadequate information-sharing between agencies, discharge without effective communication or confirmation that the care home could meet his needs, and the absence of a clear escalation process when he refused medication and fluids.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of guidance on ensuring a care home can accept a person back after discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Mr Massam was discharged back to the care home by the acute trust. The inquest heard that the home would not have accepted him back if they had been spoken to as they did not feel they could meet his needs. The inquest heard that there is no national guidance/protocol about what an acute trust should do if attempts to contact a home are unsuccessful or about the obligation to ensure the home can accept him back in such circumstances as these. ”

    Source location

    Alan Massam · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review safe and appropriate discharge arrangements for people with complex needs across Greater Manchester with localities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “For the wider Greater Manchester (GM) footprint, GMHSCP is working across the whole system to look at safe and appropriate discharges for people with complex needs. The Partnership is looking at a longer term support as part of the GM Discharge Programme and the Adult Social Care Transformation Programme. There is a programme of work underway to review this in detail and we are working with the 10 GM localities on this agenda.”

    Source location

    2021-0120-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership-Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 April 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue complex-needs and discharge scoping through the Learning Disabilities Complex Needs Programme.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Additionally there is a Learning Disabilities Complex Needs programme which has been underway for 18 months and will continue for another year. As part of this programme of work, complex needs and discharge scoping is underway.”

    Source location

    2021-0120-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership-Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 April 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish and update the Hospital Discharge Service policy and operating model guidance for NHS trusts and care home providers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “National guidance is available to support local health and care systems to facilitate good practice when patients are discharged from hospital. In March 2020, we published – and have since updated – the Hospital Discharge Service: policy and operating model⁴ guidance for NHS Trusts and care home providers, although this guidance predominantly applies to the discharge of patients who have been admitted to hospital, which does not appear to be the case here.”

    Source location

    2021-0120-Response-from-Dept-of-Health-Social-Care-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 April 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hospital discharge guidance predominantly applies to admitted patients, and this case did not appear to involve hospital admission.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In relation to communication between acute hospitals and care homes at the point of discharge, I understand from your report that Mr Massam was seen and treated within the emergency department at Stepping Hill Hospital, Stockport before returning to Lisburne Court residential home the same day. Mr Massam was not admitted to hospital and I understand from information provided by the CQC that the hospital was unaware of any concerns about the home being unable to continue to meet Mr Massam’s care needs.”

    Source location

    2021-0120-Response-from-Dept-of-Health-Social-Care-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 April 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Developing policy and procedures for integrated care and communication is outside the regulator’s direct remit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst the CQC have no direct remit in developing policy and procedures to support integrated care and optimal communication, during inspection of a service the CQC will look at joint arrangements and how systems work to facilitate the transfer of care from one setting to another. This is considered against Regulation 12 (1) (2) (i) (j) of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) regulations 2014 which states;”

    Source location

    2021-0120-Response-from-CQC-Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 April 2021

    Open published response
  4. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    MARY NABILIA GWANYAMA · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mary Nabila Gwanyama, who was suffering from severe depression, died on 26 May 2018 after stepping in front of an oncoming train at Weybridge Station. The principal concerns included discharge without adequate housing and risk planning, lack of formal risk assessments and medical review, ineffective medication, failures in discharge coordination, and difficulties in providing community support after she was housed out of area.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of pre-discharge risk assessments to be sufficiently rigorous and evidence based

    Wider context from the report

    “4. The informal risk assessments undertaken in the Abraham Cowley Unit prior to her discharge failed to place any weight on the impact on Mary of a discharge with an inchoate plan for her housing and arrived at an incorrect assessment of her risk. The risk assessments were not sufficiently rigorous and evidence based. ”

    Source location

    MARY NABILIA GWANYAMA · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 5 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to prevent discharge of vulnerable patients into homelessness through adequate housing and discharge planning

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Mary was discharged from the Abraham Cowley Unit without a discharge planning meeting taking place in circumstances where there was no confirmation that she was eligible for housing provision and with no plan as to what would happen after the Travel Lodge placement ended. There is no policy in place which prevents a vulnerable patient being discharged into homelessness from the Abraham Cowley Unit. ”

    Source location

    MARY NABILIA GWANYAMA · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Premature discharge before the effectiveness of prescribed medication is adequately observed

    Wider context from the report

    “5. Mary was prematurely discharged from the Abraham Cowley Unit suffering from severe depression and before sufficient time had been taken to observe the effectiveness of her prescribed medication. This appears in part to have been because the imperative to discharge patients took precedence over adequate discharge planning and assessment. The CPA (“Care Programme Approach”) was not followed. ”

    Source location

    MARY NABILIA GWANYAMA · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 5 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to undertake and record formal pre-discharge risk assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “3. No formal risk assessment was undertaken of Mary and no risk assessment was recorded in her records prior to her discharge from the Abraham Cowley Unit. ”

    Source location

    MARY NABILIA GWANYAMA · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 5 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update CPA and Acute Care Services policies to require a pre-discharge CPA meeting for every homeless inpatient.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust accepts that a discharge CPA meeting was not held prior to Ms Gwanyama being discharged from the Abraham Cowley Unit and, given she was homeless at the time and her housing situation was uncertain, such a meeting should have taken place. Accordingly, the Trust’s CPA policy and Acute Care Services Operational Protocol will be updated to reflect that anyone who is homeless must have a CPA discharge meeting on the inpatient ward prior to discharge.”

    Source location

    2021-0117-Response-from-Surrey-and-Borders-Partnership-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 23 April 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use the SystmOne risk-assessment node to support structured, evidence-based risk assessments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In ████████ letter dated 24th March 2021, he outlined the significant improvements that have been made regarding risk assessments since Ms Gwanyama’s death. In particular, he highlighted that a new risk assessment node has been developed on SystmOne, which was rolled out in October 2019 together with a training package focussed on:”

    Source location

    2021-0117-Response-from-Surrey-and-Borders-Partnership-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 April 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver training on risk assessment, risk factors, care-plan links and use of the SystmOne risk-assessment tool.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In ████████ letter dated 24th March 2021, he outlined the significant improvements that have been made regarding risk assessments since Ms Gwanyama’s death. In particular, he highlighted that a new risk assessment node has been developed on SystmOne, which was rolled out in October 2019 together with a training package focussed on:”

    Source location

    2021-0117-Response-from-Surrey-and-Borders-Partnership-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 April 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Recruit and deploy a Lead Nurse for Quality and Practice to improve inpatient care plans and risk assessments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to this, in April 2021 we recruited a Lead Nurse for Quality and Practice, specifically for inpatient services. Part of her role is around ensuring the quality of our inpatient care plans and risk assessments and identifying areas for improvement. We have also delivered a significant amount of Suicide Prevention Training across our clinical services.”

    Source location

    2021-0117-Response-from-Surrey-and-Borders-Partnership-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 April 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add weekly audits of discharge checklists to verify completion and close the learning loop.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Weekly audits of risk assessments and care plans are conducted by Senior Matrons in ACU and Farnham Road Hospital. We also have in place a discharge checklist, to include whether a risk assessment has been completed prior to discharge. These checklists have been in place for some time; however, they are not routinely audited. We are therefore going to add to the weekly audits a review of the discharge checklist, to ensure they are being completed appropriately and the learning loop closed.”

    Source location

    2021-0117-Response-from-Surrey-and-Borders-Partnership-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 April 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the Risk Assessment and Management Policy to guide staff in risk assessment and management.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are also reviewing our Risk Assessment and Management Policy to support and guide our staff in how to be confident in risk assessments risk and management.”

    Source location

    2021-0117-Response-from-Surrey-and-Borders-Partnership-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 April 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    A policy cannot prevent vulnerable patients from being discharged into homelessness because discharge depends on circumstances beyond the Trust’s control.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst we fully appreciate your concerns about no policy being in place, it is unfortunately not possible for the Trust to have a policy in place that prevents patients from being discharged into homelessness from our inpatient units. The onus is our duty to engage appropriately with the statutory referral to District and Borough Councils’ Housing Departments to find a homeless person settled accommodation. The pre-discharge planning would also involve our homelessness”

    Source location

    2021-0117-Response-from-Surrey-and-Borders-Partnership-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 23 April 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    District and Borough Housing Departments are responsible for finding settled accommodation following the Trust’s statutory referral of homeless patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst we fully appreciate your concerns about no policy being in place, it is unfortunately not possible for the Trust to have a policy in place that prevents patients from being discharged into homelessness from our inpatient units. The onus is our duty to engage appropriately with the statutory referral to District and Borough Councils’ Housing Departments to find a homeless person settled accommodation. The pre-discharge planning would also involve our homelessness”

    Source location

    2021-0117-Response-from-Surrey-and-Borders-Partnership-NHS-Foundation-Trust-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 23 April 2021

    Open published response
  5. Buckinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Roy Keith MORRIS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Roy Morris was found deceased in Birch Wood on 30 June 2019, having probably hanged himself there on the night of 26/27 May 2019. At the time, he was under the care of community mental health services after discharge from inpatient care. The substantive concerns were the absence of a detailed written care plan, the late allocation of a care coordinator, and insufficient opportunity for his family to engage with the inpatient team.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide detailed CPA care plans that inform patients, families, care coordinators and community teams on discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The application of the CPA policy for patients such as Roy so that they will have a detailed care plan with which they can engage and which informs the family, the care coordinator and the community team on discharge from the inpatient setting. ”

    Source location

    Roy Keith MORRIS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create a task and finish group of relevant clinicians to strengthen application of CPA policy and care coordinator practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I will state immediately that as an organisation we understand and accept the concerns that you have raised. As stated in your report, our CPA policy stipulates the requirement of a detailed care plan and recommends that the individual (or patient) and their family are involved in designing the plan of care and support required to ensure a timely and smooth discharge from hospital. We have therefore sought to strengthen the understanding and application of our policy within our teams by creating a task and finish group with relevant clinicians. The group’s main functions will be as follows:”

    Source location

    2021-0094-Response-from-Littlemore-Mental-Health-Centre-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 April 2021

    Open published response
  6. Sunderland

    AI-generated summary

    Sheldon Gary Farnell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sheldon Gary Farnell, aged 4 years, died at Sunderland Royal Hospital on 26 November 2018 after presenting very unwell and being admitted to hospital. He was discharged before antibiotics could be given for adverse blood test results, and he could not be recalled. The concerns included sepsis recognition and training, the timely prescribing of antibiotics, and providing families with contact details at admission and discharge.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide families’ contact details at hospital admission and discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Contact details for families need to be positively given (not confirmed) at the time of admission and discharge within a hospital setting. ”

    Source location

    Sheldon Gary Farnell · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. West Sussex

    AI-generated summary

    James Kenneth Herbertson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    James Kenneth Herbertson took his own life after being struck by a train near Crawley train station on 10 April 2019. Concerns included unsuitable discharge accommodation and failures to recognise and act on signs of a mental health relapse, including not referring him to the crisis team or providing additional support.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to include and inform the primary support practitioner in discharge arrangements

    Wider context from the report

    “a) The discharge arrangements from Langley Green Hospital did not include the Lead Practitioner who was going to be the primary contact responsible for providing the support to James following discharge. Although she had met him once no therapeutic relationship had been established and at the point of discharge, she was not aware that discharge had taken place. ”

    Source location

    James Kenneth Herbertson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to inform family supporters of discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “b) Although James was vulnerable his parents were also not aware of his discharge at the point of discharge and therefore were unable to offer support. ”

    Source location

    James Kenneth Herbertson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to notify vulnerable service users’ parents of discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “b) Although James was vulnerable his parents were also not aware of his discharge at the point of discharge and therefore were unable to offer support. ”

    Source location

    James Kenneth Herbertson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide safe and therapeutic post-discharge accommodation

    Wider context from the report

    “c) The accommodation offered to James both on leaving hospital (and subsequently) was not a safe and therapeutic environment for a person who had recognised mental health difficulties with a history of alcohol and substance misuse. Whilst accommodation is a matter for the Local Authority the Trust staff work with partner agencies in the planning for a S17 discharge. ”

    Source location

    James Kenneth Herbertson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to include and alert the primary lead practitioner in discharge arrangements

    Wider context from the report

    “a) The discharge arrangements from Langley Green Hospital did not include the Lead Practitioner who was going to be the primary contact responsible for providing the support to James following discharge. Although she had met him once no therapeutic relationship had been established and at the point of discharge, she was not aware that discharge had taken place. ”

    Source location

    James Kenneth Herbertson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reduce required post-discharge follow-up contact from seven days to three days under the Care Programme Approach policy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust agrees that it is best practice for the Lead Practitioner to be actively involved in the acute care discharge process and to ensure that contact is made within 3 days of discharge for follow up; as per the Care Programme Approach policy version 7 March 2020 (current policy appendix 1). At the time of James' discharge, the policy in place (version 6 appendix 2 2017) was for a 7 day follow up, but due to the requirement to improve outcomes, this was reduced in 2020 to a 3 day follow up.”

    Source location

    2021-0078-Response-from-Sussex-Partnership-NHS-Foundation-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 March 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Lead Practitioner was aware of the planned discharge and was notified, contrary to the concern that she was unaware.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To confirm, James’ Lead Practitioner was aware that he was to be discharged (as per Lead Practitioner statement, Clinical records and Serious Incident report) as the Lead Practitioner had attended the Section 117 discharge aftercare meeting on the 02.08.2018 and on the Ward which James attended, alongside his Lead Practitioner.”

    Source location

    2021-0078-Response-from-Sussex-Partnership-NHS-Foundation-Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 24 March 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing Care Programme Approach policy and multidisciplinary discharge arrangements were considered sufficient for Lead Practitioner involvement and follow-up.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust agrees that it is best practice for the Lead Practitioner to be actively involved in the acute care discharge process and to ensure that contact is made within 3 days of discharge for follow up; as per the Care Programme Approach policy version 7 March 2020 (current policy appendix 1). At the time of James' discharge, the policy in place (version 6 appendix 2 2017) was for a 7 day follow up, but due to the requirement to improve outcomes, this was reduced in 2020 to a 3 day follow up.”

    Source location

    2021-0078-Response-from-Sussex-Partnership-NHS-Foundation-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 March 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    No further action was considered necessary on family involvement because confidentiality and consent governed information sharing, with contact attempted where consent permitted.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Action Taken or Required Where the hospital/Trust agrees communication with families/carers is central to treatment and clinical decisions, it also has to maintain patient confidentiality where an”

    Source location

    2021-0078-Response-from-Sussex-Partnership-NHS-Foundation-Redacted
    Page 4 · response
    Published 24 March 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Accommodation access and organisation were considered the Local Authority’s responsibility, although Trust staff assisted with referrals and discharge planning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “c) Accommodation on discharge was not safe or therapeutic for a person who had a recognised mental health difficulty. Whilst accommodation is a matter for the Local Authority the trust staff work with partner agencies in planning for 117 discharge.”

    Source location

    2021-0078-Response-from-Sussex-Partnership-NHS-Foundation-Redacted
    Page 6 · response
    Published 24 March 2021

    Open published response
  8. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Lily-Mai HURRELL SAINT GEORGE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lily-Mai Hurrell Saint George, aged 10 weeks, suffered fatal injuries after being hurt by an adult while in the exclusive care of her parents on 31 January 2018. The principal concern was that Haringey Children’s Services discharged her into her parents’ unsupervised care despite professionals expressing the view that she should not be discharged in those circumstances.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to prevent discharge into unsupervised parental care despite professional concerns

    Wider context from the report

    “Many healthcare and other professionals expressed the view that Lily-Mai should not be discharged into the unsupervised care of her parents, but Haringey Children’s Services nevertheless facilitated that discharge from hospital on Thursday, 25 January 2018. Lily-Mai suffered her fatal injuries six days later. ”

    Source location

    Lily-Mai HURRELL SAINT GEORGE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Mid Kent and Medway

    AI-generated summary

    CHRISTOPHER SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Christopher Smith was admitted to hospital with peripheral vascular disease, extensive leg ulcers, epilepsy and infections, and died on 4 March 2019 after deterioration following discharge home. Principal concerns included inadequate discharge planning and capacity reassessment, failure to arrange home and district nursing support, unsafe home conditions and an unacted-on safeguarding alert, and inadequate nutritional care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete recommended home assessments before discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) A recommended home assessment was not completed as part of Mr Smith’s planned discharge from hospital. ”

    Source location

    CHRISTOPHER SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to inform families of discharge home when care is required

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The next of kin was incorrectly recorded on Mr Smith’s medical records and the family were not informed of his discharge home as part of the discharge planning that he required care. ”

    Source location

    CHRISTOPHER SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Mrs. Monica McCormick · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mrs. Monica McCormick developed a colonic perforation in October 2019 and underwent emergency surgery, after which pathology identified adenocarcinoma. The diagnosis was not communicated to her or her general practitioner until April 2020, following cancelled outpatient appointments, and the cancer had then spread to the liver and abdominal cavity. She died at home on 24 May 2020; the concerns included failures to follow up the pathology result, review medical records, communicate the diagnosis, and make an earlier referral for adjuvant chemotherapy.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate pathology reports to general practitioners at hospital discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The pathology report was not communicated to her general practitioner at the time she was discharged from hospital. ”

    Source location

    Mrs. Monica McCormick · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share the response at the Divisional Surgery Governance Meeting and discuss the importance of checking medical records during handover completion.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We apologise that the team did not check whether there had been a histopathology diagnosis at the time of discharge. We will share this PFD response at the Divisional of Surgery Governance Meeting and discuss with team members the importance of checking medical records in full when completing the Handover of Care Communication. It is important to highlight that these documents are completed throughout the patient admission to ensure a timely discharge once the patient is considered medically fit or optimised. We”

    Source location

    Response from Northern Care Alliance NHS Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 9 February 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Directly communicating cancer diagnoses to GPs at discharge is not standard; supported outpatient disclosure is considered best practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Dr Tierney has reviewed the case and confirms that the pathology report was not communicated to Mrs McCormick’s general practitioner (GP) at the time of discharge from hospital. However disclosure to GP at this time would not be standard practice. Any letter sent to the GP is also copied to the patient; this therefore would create the risk of a patient being made aware of a cancer diagnosis without appropriate support in place on receipt of the information.”

    Source location

    Response from Northern Care Alliance NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 February 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Communicating a cancer diagnosis to the GP at discharge is not standard practice because it could disclose the diagnosis without appropriate patient support.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “████████ has reviewed the case and confirms that the pathology report was not communicated to Mrs McCormick’s general practitioner (GP) at the time of discharge from hospital. However disclosure to GP at this time would not be standard practice. Any letter sent to the GP is also copied to the patient; this therefore would create the risk of a patient being made aware of a cancer diagnosis without appropriate support in place on receipt of the information.”

    Source location

    Response from Northern Care Alliance NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 February 2021

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026