Recurring concern

Unreliable hospital discharge processes

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 30 Jan 2013•Latest report 10 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in hospital discharge planning, readiness decisions, multidisciplinary or receiving-service coordination, safety planning, execution and directly required follow-up.

Not included

  • Inter-hospital patient transfer where no discharge from hospital care occurs
  • Failures in treatment after a safe and complete discharge
  • Generic care coordination unrelated to a hospital discharge process
  • Delays in admission or movement within hospital before discharge is being planned
Reports
273

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
406

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
524

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care48
NHS England20
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust9
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust8
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust8
Barts Health NHS Trust7
Care Quality Commission7
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust7
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board6
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust6
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB5
Kent and Medway Mental Health NHS Trust5
Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust5
Royal London Hospital5
Stockport NHS Foundation Trust5

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Inner South London

    AI-generated summary

    Naomi SULEYMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Naomi Suleyman developed and later died from pneumonia and complications of an unstageable sacral pressure sore after discharge from hospital, during a period when she was deconditioned and bedbound while her long-term needs were assessed. Concerns included inaccurate discharge information, missed welfare and therapy visits, an incorrect district nursing referral, poor communication between services, and missed opportunities to recognise and address that her discharge was unsafe.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete accurate discharge passports containing patients’ clinical, therapy, equipment and home-environment needs

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The ‘discharge passport’ completed by the UHL in-patient team was inaccurate, failing to record Ms Suleyman’s vulnerability to pressure ulcers, the need for therapies input from day 1, the equipment she required and that her home environment had not been optimised to meet her needs both in terms of equipment and layout. Whilst I heard that scrutiny of the discharge passport had improved at ward level, deficient discharge passports were still filtering through to the D2A team. ”

    Source location

    Naomi SULEYMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide social work and/or occupational therapy assessment within 24 hours of discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) Due to lack of capacity, Ms Suleyman’s interim care needs pending assessment were brokered to a care provider. As a result, she did not receive a visit from a social worker and/or occupational therapist within 24 hours of discharge as she would have done if her care needs had been provided by the in-house Enablement team. ”

    Source location

    Naomi SULEYMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to conduct an overarching coordinated investigation of the integrated multidisciplinary discharge process

    Wider context from the report

    “The issues relating to LBL only emerged in evidence during the inquest. LGT in-patient and District Nursing services have taken some steps towards addressing their deficiencies. However, there has been a fragmented and incomplete response. There has been no overarching coordinated investigation involving all the key services relevant to what is intended to be an integrated multi-disciplinary discharge process. ”

    Source location

    Naomi SULEYMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen multidisciplinary discharge-passport completion, checking, approval, electronic-record updating and daily validation before discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Each member of the ward-based team, who is involved in the patient care, now provides input into the centrally located (and saved) discharge passports.”

    Source location

    Response from Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust and Lewisham Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop standards, role definitions, guidance and staff teaching for prescribing pressure-care equipment and hospital beds.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A multidisciplinary task and finish group has commenced work to outline standards of practice, and to define roles and responsibilities relating to prescription of pressure care equipment and hospital beds. The project will be undertaken using Quality improvement methodology and will produce guidance materials and teaching for staff by end of April 2025.”

    Source location

    Response from Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust and Lewisham Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Progress the Occupational Therapy Policy through Trust governance approval.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• An Occupational Therapy Policy has been developed which outlines roles, responsibilities and processes relating to therapy practice for environmental assessments and equipment provision. This is currently being agreed through the Trusts governance procedures.”

    Source location

    Response from Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust and Lewisham Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Perform additional electronic-record checks for last-minute changes in condition or discharge support needs under an embedded discharge protocol.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The discharge team now perform additional checks on the patient electronic care record to ensure there have been no last-minute changes in the patient's condition or discharge support needs. This is underpinned by a new protocol which has been shared with the team and operationally embedded into working practices.”

    Source location

    Response from Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust and Lewisham Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct further multi-agency discharge events to improve communication and joint working.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A multi-agency discharge event was carried out on 05/03/2025 which tests the systematic approach to discharge processes and further events are planned to improve multi agency communication and ways of working.”

    Source location

    Response from Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust and Lewisham Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 January 2025

    Open published response
  2. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Jackson Yeow · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jackson Yeow, aged 16, became seriously unwell with abdominal pain and vomiting and later developed diabetic ketoacidosis and other complications. He waited approximately 9½ hours for an ambulance after his family called 999, and died on 9 April 2022. Concerns included delays in ambulance handovers associated with emergency department overcrowding, corridor care, and delayed discharge of medically fit patients.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in discharging medically fit patients for non-medical reasons

    Wider context from the report

    “Although the Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board did not provide direct care to Jackson Yeow during the period within scope, it provided the evidence of a consultant in emergency medicine to the inquest on the issue of delays in ambulance handovers at the Princess of Wales Hospital, Bridgend. That evidence directly identified the following matters of concern: (1) Care for patients in the emergency department is frequently provided in the corridor and other non clinical spaces, which: (a) Impedes efficient clinical assessment, causing clinicians to take longer performing tasks and rendering clinical care more difficult; (b) Impedes the ability of staff to recognize a patient’s deteriorating condition; (c) Increases patient morbidity through environmental factors compromising a patient’s ability to sleep, hygiene and nutrition. (d) May slow the process of ambulance handovers. (2) Care in corridors and other non clinical spaces has been normalized, which in the opinion of the consultant who gave evidence is unsafe. (3) When conducted routinely, care in corridors and other non clinical spaces reduces the capacity of the Emergency Department so that should acuity escalate, it is likely to cause delays to the release of ambulances. (4) The underlying obstacle to improving flow through the hospital and relieving pressure on the Emergency Department is the significant number of patients who are medically fit to be discharged but whose discharge is delayed due to non medical reasons. ”

    Source location

    Jackson Yeow · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Roll out the Optimise patient-flow programme to the Princess of Wales site using real-time tracking, eWhiteboards, Red2Green and SAFER board rounds.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Additionally, the STAMP (Strategic Transformation of Acute Medicine Programme) and OPTIMISE programmes have been introduced to improve patient flow across CTM. The Optimise programme utilises real-time digital tools, such as Red2Green and eWhiteboards, to ensure patients are placed in the right clinical area as quickly as possible. Early implementation of these initiatives across Royal Glamorgan and Prince Charles Hospital have significantly reduced patient delays and improved overall care efficiency and the next phase of roll out includes POW site.”

    Source location

    Response from Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 20 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue the STAMP acute-medicine transformation programme to improve hospital flow and support discharge planning across the organisation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Additionally, the STAMP (Strategic Transformation of Acute Medicine Programme) and OPTIMISE programmes have been introduced to improve patient flow across CTM. The Optimise programme utilises real-time digital tools, such as Red2Green and eWhiteboards, to ensure patients are placed in the right clinical area as quickly as possible. Early implementation of these initiatives across Royal Glamorgan and Prince Charles Hospital have significantly reduced patient delays and improved overall care efficiency and the next phase of roll out includes POW site.”

    Source location

    Response from Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 20 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the Discharge to Recover then Assess model to move patients no longer requiring acute care into appropriate settings promptly.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “- Ongoing work with Welsh Ambulance Service Trust (WAST) on optimum clinical patient pathways and the Discharge to Recover then Assess (D2RA) Hub, which has improved discharge planning and increased hospital capacity to accept new admissions.”

    Source location

    Response from Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board
    Page 5 · response
    Published 20 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and operate a centralised Discharge Hub for patient flow and community bed allocation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To tackle delayed discharges, CTMUHB has implemented: - The Discharge to Recover then Assess (D2RA) model, ensuring that patients who no longer require acute care are moved to the most appropriate setting as quickly as possible. - We have also developed the Discharge Hub as a centralised resource for patient flow and community bed allocation. - The Safe2Start meeting is now embedded pan CTM where twice a day the site is reviewed as a whole with real time demand and capacity being reviewed. Here clinical priorities are discussed and decisions are made in relation to patient flow, on boarding and balancing risk to ensure each area is safe to start.”

    Source location

    Response from Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board
    Page 7 · response
    Published 20 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue collaboration with local-authority partners to improve social-care availability and reduce delayed discharges.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We continue to work in collaboration with local authority partners to improve social care availability and prevent unnecessary delays.”

    Source location

    Response from Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board
    Page 7 · response
    Published 20 January 2025

    Open published response
  3. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    MARY MARGARET WHITLOCK · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mary Margaret Whitlock died at Broomfield Hospital on 23 August 2023 after sustaining cervical fractures in a fall and subsequently suffering aspiration following assisted feeding while experiencing swallowing difficulties. The report identified concerns about delayed provision of a recommended collar, inadequate planning and communication regarding swallowing and oral intake, medication administration despite recorded opioid allergies, understaffing, and the absence of discharge and safety-netting advice to her care home.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide discharge summaries to care homes

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) No Discharge Summary or Safety Netting advice was provided by the Trust to the care home for a patient with dementia who was discharged from Accident & Emergency at night where she had undergone investigations for traumatic head injury ”

    Source location

    MARY MARGARET WHITLOCK · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind Emergency Medicine clinicians to complete discharge summaries for every patient, including those discharged somewhere other than home.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following Mrs Whitlock’s experience, all our Emergency Medicine clinicians have been reminded of the requirement to complete a discharge summary to all patients in every case. We have highlighted the importance of these being available to patients who are not being discharged to their own home.”

    Source location

    Response from Mid & South Essex NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 December 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind nursing staff to verify discharge-summary completion before patients leave the department.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Nursing colleagues have also been reminded to check that this has been completed prior to the patient leaving the department upon discharge.”

    Source location

    Response from Mid & South Essex NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 December 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish learning from the case in the January 2025 all-staff patient safety bulletin, emphasising complete and accurate discharge summaries at discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have included the learning from Mrs Whitlock’s case within our all-staff patient safety bulletin for January 2025 emphasising the importance of a full and accurate discharge summary being completed at the point of discharge.”

    Source location

    Response from Mid & South Essex NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 December 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor discharge-summary issuance through the 2025 trust-wide corporate audit programme and use findings to determine further action.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We plan to monitor our performance with issuing discharge summaries within our 2025 trust-wide corporate audit programme to assure ourselves with compliance and use the results to take action as appropriate.”

    Source location

    Response from Mid & South Essex NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 December 2024

    Open published response
  4. Inner West London

    AI-generated summary

    Junior George Powell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Junior George Powell presented with acute abdominal pain and vomiting, was found to have an aortic dissection with reduced blood flow and intestinal ischaemia, and died at St George’s Hospital on 6 September 2021 after his condition deteriorated. The report identified concern that delays in discharging patients awaiting suitable social care can congest hospital admissions, delay assessment and diagnosis of urgent conditions, and increase the likelihood of death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of suitable community social care delaying discharge of patients ready to leave hospital

    Wider context from the report

    “That delay in discharge for patients ready to be discharged due to lack of suitable social care in the community is causing congestion in the hospital admission process, delaying medical assessment and thus diagnosis of conditions that need urgent treatment and increasing the likelihood of death for such patients. ”

    Source location

    Junior George Powell · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    George Neville Coulthard · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    George Neville Coulthard sustained skin wounds after an accidental fall, experienced gastrointestinal bleeds while in hospital, and later deteriorated and died at Bramhall Manor on 27 January 2024. The principal concerns were delays in discharge due to difficulty finding a suitable care home, ineffective communication about whether he required end-of-life care or rehabilitation, failure to clarify care arrangements, and limited community access to wound-care support.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in identifying suitable care home placements

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Mr Coulthard was assessed as being suitable for discharge on 18th December. He remained in an acute hospital setting for a further 4 weeks due to challenges in identifying a suitable care home. This was due to the inquest was told to a shortage of suitable places and the Christmas period. The impact of this on Mr Coulthard was that he remained in an acute setting when the inquest was told the care he required would have been better delivered in a care home /nursing home setting. In addition the inquest heard evidence that it meant that an acute bed required for other patients was not available creating delays in allocating beds to patients requiring admission. The inquest was told that significant delays of this nature occur on a regular basis and are often exacerbated over the Christmas period. ”

    Source location

    George Neville Coulthard · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue reviewing discharge processes, alternatives to hospital admission, and patient-flow pathways across Greater Manchester hospitals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “You refer to such delays occurring on a regular basis and often exacerbated by the festive period. The winter period generally is extremely busy with high numbers of patients entering the hospital and needing to be admitted for care and treatment. Whilst every effort is made to appropriately manage the flow of patients to free up beds, there are occasions when delays in discharge do impact on patient flow. This is regrettably not a scenario that is specific to the festive period as such challenges occur throughout the year, but particularly through the winter months. As a system we consistently review discharge processes, alternatives to hospital admission, and patient flow pathways. This is with a view to improving the patient experience and flow through all GM hospitals so that patients can receive the right care at the right time and in the right place.”

    Source location

    Response from GMIC
    Page 4 · response
    Published 24 September 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct a further Single Assessment Framework assessment reviewing previously identified shortfalls and whether the provider has sufficiently improved.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of our processes, we are currently conducting a further assessment (under our new Single Assessment Framework) to review all the shortfalls identified at the last inspection and consider if there has been sufficient improvement. If we do not believe the registered provider has appropriately addressed the breaches of regulation to the extent”

    Source location

    Response from CQC
    Page 4 · response
    Published 24 September 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update statutory hospital-discharge guidance to support safe, coordinated transfers and continuity of care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This funding is pooled via the Better Care Fund, which requires integrated care boards (ICBs) and local authorities to make joint plans and pool budgets for the purposes of providing more joined-up and effective care. Every acute hospital has access to a care transfer hub. These hubs bring together professionals from the NHS and social care to manage discharges for people with more complex needs and who need extra support. Statutory guidance on hospital discharge (updated in January 2024) sets out how local authorities and NHS bodies can ensure that people are discharged safely from hospital to the most appropriate place and continue to receive the care and support they need, taking into account the legal duties in the Health and Care Act 2022.”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 3 · response
    Published 24 September 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Care home placement shortages and hospital discharge delays fall outside the regulator’s remit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have given careful consideration to this point and have concluded that this, regretfully sits outside of CQC remit. We note that this report has also been sent to the Secretary of State and Greater Manchester Integrated Care and believe they will be of greater assistance in addressing this aspect of your concerns.”

    Source location

    Response from CQC
    Page 3 · response
    Published 24 September 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Secretary of State and Greater Manchester Integrated Care are considered better placed to address care placement shortages and discharge delays.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have given careful consideration to this point and have concluded that this, regretfully sits outside of CQC remit. We note that this report has also been sent to the Secretary of State and Greater Manchester Integrated Care and believe they will be of greater assistance in addressing this aspect of your concerns.”

    Source location

    Response from CQC
    Page 3 · response
    Published 24 September 2024

    Open published response
  6. West Yorkshire Eastern

    AI-generated summary

    Evelyn Grace March · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Evelyn Grace March was born after a prolonged labour and was discharged home with her parents four hours later. The following night, while being breastfed in her mother’s bed, she was found unresponsive and could not be revived. The report raises concerns about maternal exhaustion, the early discharge after prolonged labour, and the risk of accidental suffocation while a sleeping adult was in bed with the baby.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Premature discharge after prolonged labour and induced delivery

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Consideration should be given to the wisdom of discharging a mother so soon after a prolonged labour and induced delivery. Had she been permitted to sleep in hospital for a few hours knowing that her baby was being monitored, the tragedy may have been avoided. ”

    Source location

    Evelyn Grace March · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Immediate postnatal care and discharge were considered compliant with national guidance, so earlier discharge arrangements were not changed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I respectfully note that you state that consideration should be given to the wisdom of discharging a mother so soon after a prolonged labour and delivery.”

    Source location

    Response from Leeds Teaching Hospitals
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 September 2024

    Open published response
  7. Cheshire

    AI-generated summary

    Charles Henry DANIELS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Charles Henry Daniels was admitted to Stepping Hill Hospital in January 2024 after a fall and was later discharged home in March despite being described as clearly unwell. He returned to hospital with an acute on chronic subdural bleed and died on 21 March 2024. Concerns included inadequate nursing record-keeping, failure to alert a doctor to his deterioration before discharge, and the distress caused by his condition and discharge arrangements at home.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to alert a doctor to significant deterioration before discharge home

    Wider context from the report

    “2) Neither the discharging nurse nor North West Ambulance Service personnel attending Stepping Hill on 6 March 2024, for the purposes of his discharge home, appear to have alerted a doctor to the significant deterioration in Mr Daniel’s condition since last assessed by a doctor on 4 March. ”

    Source location

    Charles Henry DANIELS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing policy-based escalation was considered sufficient because observations did not warrant medical review before discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “████████ has further reviewed the record and has confirmed that Mr Daniels’ vital observations did not warrant any escalation to the medical team at any point from 4 March”

    Source location

    Response from Stepping Hill Hospital
    Page 1 · response
    Published 31 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust disputes that significant deterioration was identified on discharge, citing a NEWS of zero throughout the admission.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “On the day of discharge, the Ward Sister recalls that Mr Daniels required the assistance of three to transfer but due to his variable requirements for assistance with mobility, this did not appear unduly out of character.”

    Source location

    Response from Stepping Hill Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 October 2024

    Open published response
  8. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Mr David Thompson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr David Thompson had a longstanding affective disorder and a history of alcohol and illicit drug use. After receiving inpatient and outpatient mental health care, he consumed alcohol and inflicted deep cuts to his wrists; he died on 3 March 2024 from hypovolaemic shock caused by the wrist injuries. Concerns included gaps in discharge planning and follow-up at Priory Dorking, incomplete awareness of his care and relapse history at Priory Altrincham, and a lack of communication between NHS and private consultants.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to commence and complete a safety plan during admission and before discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The Incident Review of his admission to the Priory Dorking indicated that there was no My Safety Plan commenced on admission or complete prior to his discharge. ”

    Source location

    Mr David Thompson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete the discharge clinical entry and risk assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “5. A discharge clinical entry and discharge risk assessment was not completed and there was no evidence of crisis information having been provided. ”

    Source location

    Mr David Thompson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind staff to complete required My Safety Plans and monitor compliance through daily dashboard reviews and audits.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Issue a reminder to all staff the requirement to complete a My Safety Plan, and to outline the circumstances when a My Safety Plan is required.”

    Source location

    Response from Priory Group
    Page 6 · response
    Published 12 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind staff to complete discharge clinical entries, risk assessments, checklists and crisis-information provision in accordance with policy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Priory Hospital Dorking are to evidence safe discharge planning in accordance with Priory policy H02 Admission, Transfer and Discharge - to include completion of a clinical entry, updated risk assessment on discharge and issue all patients with a crisis card with”

    Source location

    Response from Priory Group
    Page 9 · response
    Published 12 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The NHS sending provider is responsible for overseeing individual care, including engagement in communication, discharge and care planning for out-of-area patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “GM ICB expect the NHS “sending” provider to oversee the individual care relating to any patient who is admitted as an Out of Area placement in line with National Host commissioner guidance. This includes attendance at ward rounds, face to face visits where appropriate and full engagement in discharge and care planning. The processes as described above have been implemented since December 2023 and have provided a much tighter grip and control and increased level of oversight of each individual patient.”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester NHS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 August 2024

    Open published response
  9. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Danny Jay Anderson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Danny Jay Anderson, who had chronic mental health difficulties and was discharged from hospital to inadequate accommodation without a comprehensive risk assessment or safety plan, was found hanging in his room on 30 March 2023 and pronounced dead at the scene. The report identifies concerns about inadequate risk formulation, over-reliance on Danny’s responses about suicidal ideation, insufficient consideration of his history and circumstances, and the absence of a safety plan before discharge from hospital or community mental health services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of safety planning before discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “There was no evidence of any adequate formulation of risk prior to Danny’s discharge from hospital on the 14 December 2022 and no evidence of any adequate risk formulation prior to Danny’s discharge from the community mental health team in January 2023. The statement “Danny does not present with any suicidal ideation or self-harming behaviour“ was copied and pasted multiple times throughout the risk assessment template on the 14 December 2022. There was no analysis or formulation of risk for Danny. From review of the records throughout the admission, I am concerned that there was an over-reliance upon Danny’s answer to questions posed about suicidal ideation and intent. At the point of discharge, there was no evidence of information gathering around Danny’s mental state, behaviour, psychiatric history, history of abuse, social situation – and evidence that this information was used to form a judgement about the likelihood or probability of an adverse or harmful outcome (in accordance with the Trust’s risk policy). There was no evidence of any consideration of Danny’s historical factors and experiences, more recent problems and existing strengths and resources (in accordance with the NICE guidelines 2022). Witnesses from consultant level to care co-ordinator level, were unable to describe a robust risk assessment process. I am concerned that staff do not fully understand how to assess and manage risk. There was no safety plan on discharge from hospital, or prior to discharge from the community team, to address the clear risks that Danny posed. ”

    Source location

    Danny Jay Anderson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of adequate risk formulation before discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “There was no evidence of any adequate formulation of risk prior to Danny’s discharge from hospital on the 14 December 2022 and no evidence of any adequate risk formulation prior to Danny’s discharge from the community mental health team in January 2023. The statement “Danny does not present with any suicidal ideation or self-harming behaviour“ was copied and pasted multiple times throughout the risk assessment template on the 14 December 2022. There was no analysis or formulation of risk for Danny. From review of the records throughout the admission, I am concerned that there was an over-reliance upon Danny’s answer to questions posed about suicidal ideation and intent. At the point of discharge, there was no evidence of information gathering around Danny’s mental state, behaviour, psychiatric history, history of abuse, social situation – and evidence that this information was used to form a judgement about the likelihood or probability of an adverse or harmful outcome (in accordance with the Trust’s risk policy). There was no evidence of any consideration of Danny’s historical factors and experiences, more recent problems and existing strengths and resources (in accordance with the NICE guidelines 2022). Witnesses from consultant level to care co-ordinator level, were unable to describe a robust risk assessment process. I am concerned that staff do not fully understand how to assess and manage risk. There was no safety plan on discharge from hospital, or prior to discharge from the community team, to address the clear risks that Danny posed. ”

    Source location

    Danny Jay Anderson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement discharge steps and multidisciplinary discharge planning meetings with managerial and matron oversight.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust have made improvements, at pace in respect of the processes for formulation of risk on discharge with the implementation of discharge steps developed by the Trust Patient Flow Team. There has also been a change in practice to ensure we hold a discharge planning meeting with the Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) before discharge from hospital. Clinical service managers and matrons join discharge meetings to ensure a collaborative approach.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership NHS
    Page 1 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review named-nurse processes and guidelines to clarify risk-assessment and discharge responsibilities across inpatient wards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust recognises that there was confusion around responsibilities of the named nurse, which includes risk assessment and formulating risks including plan at point of discharge. The Trust Quality Matron for Fundamentals of Care is leading on an improvement project looking at processes for the named nurse which aims to ensure there is consistent understanding of the named nurse role”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership NHS
    Page 1 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Improve discharge and care-planning documentation with discharge prompts, carer involvement, and service-user review of correspondence.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust is on an ongoing journey for improved documentation, which has included training sessions and a specific focus on this within supervision reviews. Work has been undertaken to update the discharge letter template to include discharge planning prompts and the incorporation of carer involvement in the Care Programme Approach review documentation. Discharge letters have been reviewed by the Service User Network Group to review content and tone of correspondence.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership NHS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide Trust-wide community mental-health-team training on enhanced transition care planning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Additional training has been undertaken Trust wide in Community Mental Health Teams to support enhanced transition care planning.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership NHS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Roll out STORM risk-management training to frontline staff, targeting 60% of registered urgent-care practitioners by the end of 2024.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “and development of our staff with the new Skills Training on Risk Management (STORM) training. This is an evidence-based training methodology given to frontline team members who have the opportunity to practice, reflect, and give and receive feedback on skills in a safe and supportive learning environment. It uses the highest standard level of skills development, which includes filmed skills practice for the more advanced courses. The focus is on the person, collaboration, assessment, and safety planning, and they are joined by new skill sets including Suicide and self-harm – exploring the similarities and differences for assessment. We aim to have 60% of all registered practitioners across all urgent care pathways trained by end of 2024. Achievement of this training roll out is overseen by the Trust’s suicide prevention quality priority group.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership NHS
    Page 4 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Re-share the clinical risk policy and provide ward posters on safe discharge steps.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition we have re-shared the clinical risk policy with staff supported with poster for wards on safety discharge steps”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership NHS
    Page 4 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the Safety Action Plan to document agreed discharge actions, relapse signatures, and multidisciplinary outcomes in patient records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Action is already underway as part of the Safety Action Plan to ensure there are clear documented actions agreed at discharge meetings and that the MDT outcome form is completed for each person clearly stating any actions and an overview of relapse signatures and recorded in the patient record.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership NHS
    Page 4 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide clinical risk-assessment training and apply the clinical risk policy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The organisation recognises that the quality of the narrative used in risk assessment is essential for staff to understand risk. This will always be dependent on the staff member completing this. The Trust has clinical risk assessment training in place and a clinical risk policy to guide staff. For ongoing support the Trust has implemented review of risk assessments and documentation completed as part of staff members’ clinical supervision, this enables discussion and immediate learning support for each staff member.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership NHS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate a clinical dashboard identifying missing risk formulations and crisis summaries for managerial follow-up.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has established a new oversight system to enable managers to identify any gaps in risk”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership NHS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review inpatient and community care plans and risk assessments during staff one-to-one supervision.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of all staff one to ones, supervisors work with inpatient named nurses/ community care coordinators reviewing their care plans and risk assessment to check quality of the clinical entries.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership NHS
    Page 3 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct record, matron, and person-centred audits of risk formulation, crisis summaries, and care documentation, with feedback to staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition the Trust has clinical audit processes which include a record keeping audit and a ‘matron’s records audit’ which includes review of risk formulation and crisis summary. Audit results are taken back to staff and highlighted through discussed in team meetings. The audit process has been reviewed and the Trust now has a person centred audit undertaken where possible with the names nurse to review an individual’s care and documentation thereafter.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership NHS
    Page 3 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review care-coordinator roles and responsibilities and continue risk-assessment improvement through the Disengagement Safety Improvement Programme.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Work has been undertaken by the Director NE Essex Community Services, Trust Wide Perinatal, Children’s Learning Disability and Allied Health Professionals Operations to review the role and responsibilities of care coordinators and ongoing quality improvement for risk assessment is part of the Trust Disengagement Safety Improvement Programme”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership NHS
    Page 4 · response
    Published 1 August 2024

    Open published response
  10. Central and South East Kent

    AI-generated summary

    Megan Ceris Williams · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Megan Ceris Williams developed abdominal pain and repeated vomiting between 1 and 5 May 2022, attended hospital twice, and died at home on 5 May 2022 after becoming breathless and losing consciousness. The inquest identified an undiagnosed small bowel obstruction apparently caused by adhesions from previous abdominal surgery. Concerns included possible missed opportunities for investigation, limited staff knowledge and clarity of the Acute Abdominal Pain Pathway, the lack of a signed self-discharge record, and the hospital investigation process not including information from family members.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a clearly documented and recorded process for patient self-discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “Independent expert evidence was heard that indicated that the deceased likely had band adhesions - a known complication of her past abdominal surgery. It was the expert’s opinion that a small loop of bowel had become trapped in the adhesions causing pain and obstruction. The expert stated that this loop of bowel may have slid in and out explaining why the deceased’s symptoms were transient across the period of time that was examined (between 1st and 5th May 2022) and why clinicians suspected gastritis rather than a bowel obstruction. The inquest examined whether or not it would have been appropriate for a CT scan to have been done on the first hospital admission on 2nd May 2022. The lack of any record of a bout of vomiting by the deceased shortly before she left hospital on that date was relevant inasmuch as, had it been noted by hospital staff, may have lead to the deceased remaining in hospital with the potential for further investigations have been carried out which may have provided opportunities to intervene. The inquest also examined East Kent Hospital’s Acute Abdominal Pain Pathway (AAPP) including knowledge of this pathway among clinicians and the clarity of the pathway as it was documented included about a patient being referred directly back to any specialist department (such as surgeons) if returning to hospital within 48 hours of having been discharged. The lack of any signed record of the deceased self-discharging from hospital on 5th May was concerning. The inquest also examined the EKHT SI process and heard from an emergency department consultant who spoke as to the process. It was suggested that the SI process had not taken account of information which had been provided by the deceased’s family. (a) That there was a lack of knowledge, among clinical staff, of the Acute Abdominal Pain Pathway (AAPP). (b) Given what was said about how clear the AAPP was, that EKHT should provide evidence of what further work has been done make it clearer and accessible to clinicians. (c) That the hospital SI process did not include information from family and other interested persons or parties as part its fact-finding exercise. (d) There was not a clearly documented and recorded process for patients who self-discharge from hospital. ”

    Source location

    Megan Ceris Williams · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain a signed record of patient self-discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “Independent expert evidence was heard that indicated that the deceased likely had band adhesions - a known complication of her past abdominal surgery. It was the expert’s opinion that a small loop of bowel had become trapped in the adhesions causing pain and obstruction. The expert stated that this loop of bowel may have slid in and out explaining why the deceased’s symptoms were transient across the period of time that was examined (between 1st and 5th May 2022) and why clinicians suspected gastritis rather than a bowel obstruction. The inquest examined whether or not it would have been appropriate for a CT scan to have been done on the first hospital admission on 2nd May 2022. The lack of any record of a bout of vomiting by the deceased shortly before she left hospital on that date was relevant inasmuch as, had it been noted by hospital staff, may have lead to the deceased remaining in hospital with the potential for further investigations have been carried out which may have provided opportunities to intervene. The inquest also examined East Kent Hospital’s Acute Abdominal Pain Pathway (AAPP) including knowledge of this pathway among clinicians and the clarity of the pathway as it was documented included about a patient being referred directly back to any specialist department (such as surgeons) if returning to hospital within 48 hours of having been discharged. The lack of any signed record of the deceased self-discharging from hospital on 5th May was concerning. The inquest also examined the EKHT SI process and heard from an emergency department consultant who spoke as to the process. It was suggested that the SI process had not taken account of information which had been provided by the deceased’s family. (a) That there was a lack of knowledge, among clinical staff, of the Acute Abdominal Pain Pathway (AAPP). (b) Given what was said about how clear the AAPP was, that EKHT should provide evidence of what further work has been done make it clearer and accessible to clinicians. (c) That the hospital SI process did not include information from family and other interested persons or parties as part its fact-finding exercise. (d) There was not a clearly documented and recorded process for patients who self-discharge from hospital. ”

    Source location

    Megan Ceris Williams · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update and disseminate policies clarifying staff duties for missing patients and patients attempting self-discharge, including patient risk assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To ensure a repeat of similar incidents does not re-occur, the Trust has also updated its policy relating to patients who self-discharge from hospital. Enclosed with this letter is the Trust’s updated Missing Persons Policy (Document 7) and the Discharge Criteria policy (Document 8). This has been through 3 separate reviews and updates since May 2022 and ensures that the duties of staff members relating to missing patients and patients who are attempting to self-discharge are clearly established. It also now includes an updated Patient Risk Assessment so that staff members can”

    Source location

    Response from East Kent Hospitals
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 September 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue updated discharge guidance requiring capacity, safeguarding, consultation, medication, notification, documentation and self-discharge form checks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, the Trust has updated the Hospital Discharge and Criteria to Reside Policy. The Policy was updated and issued to all staff at the Trust on 16 February 2023. The updated policy directs staff to always consider the following when a patient indicates that they want to self-discharge:”

    Source location

    Response from East Kent Hospitals
    Page 4 · response
    Published 30 September 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require post-discharge welfare telephone calls for ward patients who self-discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Of key importance is that patients are asked to review the Self Discharge Form which must then be filed within the patient’s case notes. The Self Discharge Form sets out the risks of discharging against medical advice and asks a patient to consider these risks before signing the form. This is to ensure that patients have weighed the risks of self-discharge and ensures that there is a recorded process. The Policy also mandates that following discharge, if on a ward, then a welfare check telephone call be made to ensure the patient has arrived home safely.”

    Source location

    Response from East Kent Hospitals
    Page 4 · response
    Published 30 September 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    No actions by NICE are considered necessary to address the issues raised in the report.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “On this occasion, we do not consider that there are any actions from NICE that would address the issues raised.”

    Source location

    Response from NICE
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 September 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The concerns are local Trust issues outside NHS England’s remit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I note that you have also addressed your Report to East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust (EKHT), and it is appropriate that they respond to each of the concerns raised by the Coroner, as these concerns do not fall under NHS England’s remit and are all local issues for the Trust to address.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 September 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust should respond to and address the concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I note that you have also addressed your Report to East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust (EKHT), and it is appropriate that they respond to each of the concerns raised by the Coroner, as these concerns do not fall under NHS England’s remit and are all local issues for the Trust to address.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 September 2024

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026