Recurring concern

Unreliable hospital discharge processes

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 30 Jan 2013•Latest report 10 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in hospital discharge planning, readiness decisions, multidisciplinary or receiving-service coordination, safety planning, execution and directly required follow-up.

Not included

  • Inter-hospital patient transfer where no discharge from hospital care occurs
  • Failures in treatment after a safe and complete discharge
  • Generic care coordination unrelated to a hospital discharge process
  • Delays in admission or movement within hospital before discharge is being planned
Reports
273

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
406

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
524

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care48
NHS England20
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust9
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust8
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust8
Barts Health NHS Trust7
Care Quality Commission7
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust7
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board6
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust6
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB5
Kent and Medway Mental Health NHS Trust5
Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust5
Royal London Hospital5
Stockport NHS Foundation Trust5

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. East Riding and Hull

    AI-generated summary

    Sylvia Linda WHITE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sylvia Linda WHITE, aged 92, was found pinned to the floor by an overturned wardrobe after an apparent fall or slip on 13 October 2023 and died in hospital on 28 October 2023 from a traumatic subdural haemorrhage. Concerns were raised that hospital discharge summaries did not adequately record her increased frailty and decreased mobility, resulting in insufficient information for carers’ ongoing risk assessments.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete pre-discharge risk assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Prior to this incident occurring Mrs White had been in hospital and discharged on 4th October 2023. A manager for the care home outlined that the paperwork provided to carers known as the “Discharge Summary” is often inadequate in providing suitable information. In this instance I was informed it did not provide any information on Mrs White’s increased frailty and decreased mobility. This means that information provided is inappropriate for ongoing risk assessments. 4. The manager did outline a particular form that they prefer, I make no comment regarding the format of the information required, merely the need for appropriate information to allow risk assessments to take place. 5. The manager stated that a social worker should be completing a risk assessment prior to discharge but this often does not happen. In many cases a doctor or another member of staff will complete a discharge summary. The information in these is often lacking to safeguard the welfare of the person concern with regard to their care needs. The manager stated they often have to alert safeguarding at the local authority of the deficit. 6. Bearing in mind the importance of a discharge summary in providing the foundation information for the ongoing safe care of patients as they leave the hospital environment, this is an issue where either a structured approach is required or training to those who are failing to complete them correctly is required. ”

    Source location

    Sylvia Linda WHITE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequacy of discharge summaries for ongoing care risk assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Prior to this incident occurring Mrs White had been in hospital and discharged on 4th October 2023. A manager for the care home outlined that the paperwork provided to carers known as the “Discharge Summary” is often inadequate in providing suitable information. In this instance I was informed it did not provide any information on Mrs White’s increased frailty and decreased mobility. This means that information provided is inappropriate for ongoing risk assessments. 4. The manager did outline a particular form that they prefer, I make no comment regarding the format of the information required, merely the need for appropriate information to allow risk assessments to take place. 5. The manager stated that a social worker should be completing a risk assessment prior to discharge but this often does not happen. In many cases a doctor or another member of staff will complete a discharge summary. The information in these is often lacking to safeguard the welfare of the person concern with regard to their care needs. The manager stated they often have to alert safeguarding at the local authority of the deficit. 6. Bearing in mind the importance of a discharge summary in providing the foundation information for the ongoing safe care of patients as they leave the hospital environment, this is an issue where either a structured approach is required or training to those who are failing to complete them correctly is required. ”

    Source location

    Sylvia Linda WHITE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Relevant frailty and mobility information is provided through the TARF, which was appropriately completed and submitted for social care risk assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “explained in the course of the inquest. Information regarding a patient’s frailty and mobility is detailed in a form known as a Trusted Assessor Referral Form (TARF) not the patient’s discharge summary, as suggested by the Care Manager. This form is sent from the hospital to the Local Authority, who risk assess the patient’s needs within the community. Trusted Assessor schemes are a national initiative designed to reduce delays when patients are ready for discharge from hospital. This approach allows adult social care providers to adopt and use assessments carried out while patients are still in hospital, promoting safe and timely discharges.”

    Source location

    Response from Hull University Teaching Hospitals
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 February 2024

    Open published response
  2. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Shahzadi Khan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Shahzadi Khan was detained under the Mental Health Act after a manic episode with psychotic symptoms and was discharged from an out-of-area private hospital to her family home. Following inadequate discharge planning, communication problems and a failure to arrange the appropriate community care pathway, she deteriorated and took a fatal overdose of prescribed zopiclone at home. The concerns included the effects of out-of-area placements, poor coordination of local care pathways, and insufficient awareness of menopause as a possible factor in mental health deterioration.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of out-of-area and private providers to coordinate effectively with local discharge arrangements

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The inquest heard evidence that a shortage of mental health beds nationally meant that the situation that arose here of a placement out of area many miles from home was not unusual and that private beds were being used on a regular basis due to a shortage of NHS beds. The inquest heard that this meant that there were a number of consequences as a result of all of such placements which could as in Ms Khan’s case impact on a patient and increase the risk they presented. In particular: • A family could not easily stay in contact and visiting was almost impossible. This meant a patient felt more isolated and their family could not provide information effectively to the treating clinicians. • Where a non-NHS bed was being used or an out of trust bed was being used notes were not easily shared as different electronic systems were used. • Out of area trusts/private providers would not be familiar with local arrangements to support discharge and had to rely on local trust teams to put plans in place which could as in this case lead to less effective communication ”

    Source location

    Shahzadi Khan · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to establish a clear discharge plan understood by all involved in care

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The inquest heard that due to its size the mental health trust covers a number of areas. Each area has its own systems and pathways. Lack of understanding of these pathways by coordinating teams meant that patients were not being moved onto the correct pathway for care. The inquest heard that this was compounded by a lack of awareness by the Trafford HBT of the local pathway for a patient such as Ms Khan and the need for a clear discharge plan to be in place that was understood by all those involved in a patient’s care including her family and mental health care workers. ”

    Source location

    Shahzadi Khan · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish statutory guidance for discharge from all mental health inpatient settings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To improve the issue of out of area placements, and to support adult social care and discharge, up to £2.8 billion has been made available in 2023/24 and £4.7 billion in 2024/25. This can be used to support discharge from mental health inpatient settings, reducing bed occupancy and OAPs. The Department has been working with NHS England and other”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 February 2024

    Open published response
  3. Teesside and Hartlepool

    AI-generated summary

    Kate Elizabeth O’Donnell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kate Elizabeth O’Donnell underwent surgery on 16 March 2022 and was discharged the following day. She developed sepsis from the surgery, originating in her gut, and died at James Cook University Hospital on 23 March 2022. Principal concerns included inadequate surgical planning, failure to provide appropriate prophylactic antibiotics for the gastrointestinal surgery, insufficient postoperative vigilance and assessment before discharge, incomplete nursing records, and inadequate discharge information.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to physically assess the patient by a doctor before discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “6. Kate was not physically assessed by a doctor prior to discharge. ”

    Source location

    Kate Elizabeth O’Donnell · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide families with deterioration warning signs and actions at discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “10. The family were not provided with information upon discharge as to what signs to look out for and what steps to take if Kate was to deteriorate. ”

    Source location

    Kate Elizabeth O’Donnell · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and provide patients and carers with a postoperative sepsis-awareness information card.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A conversation should have taken place to advise Kate’s parents of the signs and symptoms of sepsis however on this occasion this did not happen. One of the actions completed as part of the Serious Incident investigation was to develop a sepsis awareness information card which is now given to patients/carers post operatively.”

    Source location

    Response from South Tees Hospitals
    Page 5 · response
    Published 25 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Records and the discharge checklist indicate that a doctor saw the patient before discharge, although staff roles may not have been made clear.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There is a written record of a ward round in Kate’s health care records, which has been incorrectly dated as 16th March 2022, when it does in fact relate to 17th March 2022. The entry states that it is “day one” following surgery, which is always the day following surgery and it also states “home today” which would also indicate that the ward round is from 17th March.”

    Source location

    Response from South Tees Hospitals
    Page 4 · response
    Published 25 January 2024

    Open published response
  4. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Rhys Lennon Hill · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Rhys Lennon Hill underwent spinal surgery and was discharged from Royal Preston Hospital on 30 January 2023. He collapsed at home on 9 February 2023 and attempts to resuscitate him were unsuccessful; a post-mortem examination found that he died from a pulmonary embolus due to a deep vein thrombosis. The principal concerns included failure to escalate his refusal of Dalteparin or assess the associated risk, failure to provide required VTE information at discharge, and wider problems with communication, documentation, medication reconciliation, and discharge processes.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unclear governance of safe discharge decisions from the neurosurgical ward

    Wider context from the report

    “7. The system for deciding when a discharge form the neuro surgical ward was safe was unclear. The evidence appeared to suggest that the Physiotherapy team took responsibility for it if they assessed mobility at a suitable level. It was unclear how that was overseen and fitted with the responsibility of the treating clinician; ”

    Source location

    Rhys Lennon Hill · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to follow and understand the VTE policy for discharge risk reduction

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The VTE policy was not fully followed and there was evidence that there was limited understanding by staff of precisely what the trust policy required in relation to reducing the risk at discharge of VTE; ”

    Source location

    Rhys Lennon Hill · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust is the appropriate organisation to respond to concerns one to seven.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This response focuses on the issues raised in your Report within the remit of NHS England national policy and programmes. Concern numbers one to seven in your Report fall under the remit of Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. I note that you have also addressed your Report to the Trust, who are the appropriate organisation to respond. NHS England has requested to be sighted on this and will carefully consider their response to the coroner. My regional Quality colleagues within the North West have been engaging with Lancashire and South Cumbria Integrated Care Board (ICB) to seek assurance for the local concerns raised.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response
  5. Cumbria

    AI-generated summary

    Karena WICKINGS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Karena Wickings, aged 58, died at home in Brampton, Cumbria on 5 February 2023 from pulmonary embolism following a prolonged hospital admission for surgery and postoperative complications. Her mobility remained significantly restricted at discharge, when anticoagulant prophylaxis stopped. The report raises concern that discharge planning did not consider whether ongoing anticoagulant prophylaxis was indicated for patients who had not regained full mobility.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of discharge planning to consider ongoing anticoagulant prophylaxis for patients with restricted mobility

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The surgical mortality review conducted after Karena's does not seem to have considered the role that anticoagulation may have played. I understand trust guidelines suggest it continues until 5-7 days or until the patient regains full mobility. I was told many surgeons will extend this to 28 days. Karena was past the 28 day period but still had significant restriction at the time of discharge. A few years ago I heard a very similar case which occurred at a different health trust. The purpose of this report is to suggest that discharge planning might have a prompt to consider possible ongoing anticoagulant prophylaxis in patients who leave the hospital but have not yet regained full mobility. ”

    Source location

    Karena WICKINGS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review NICE guidance and update the Trust pharmacological VTE prophylaxis guideline, including discharge advice and VTE-risk documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Recommendation 2: Update the Pharmacological VTE Prophylaxis in Adult Medical and Surgical Patients Guideline to include advice on discharge and documenting VTE risk.”

    Source location

    Response from Cumbria NHS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share the Regulation 28 recommendation with Matrons to raise awareness of discharge VTE documentation requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Recommendation 3: Amend the nursing discharge checklist to document the ongoing plan for VTE prophylaxis at the time of discharge, to ensure patient information advice and management plan for pharmacological VTE.”

    Source location

    Response from Cumbria NHS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss implementation with Digital Systems to add VTE discharge documentation to the nursing checklist.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Recommendation 3: Amend the nursing discharge checklist to document the ongoing plan for VTE prophylaxis at the time of discharge, to ensure patient information advice and management plan for pharmacological VTE.”

    Source location

    Response from Cumbria NHS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit the nursing discharge checklist for compliance with VTE documentation requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Liaise with Digital Systems to update the system to include VTE on discharge in the nursing checklist.”

    Source location

    Response from Cumbria NHS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Progress training, discharge-summary amendments and ownership guidance for documenting VTE assessment and ongoing prophylaxis at discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Recommendation 4: VTE assessment at the time of discharge to be documented on the electronic discharge summary, providing an update on actions taken to reduce this risk and any further actions required.”

    Source location

    Response from Cumbria NHS
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Amend the ward-round proforma to prompt daily VTE review and a discharge VTE-risk plan.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Recommendation 5: Amend the Ward round proforma to include daily review of VTE in place and plan for discharge with regards to VTE.”

    Source location

    Response from Cumbria NHS
    Page 4 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response
  6. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    ANDREW ETLERED NICHOLS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Andrew Nichols developed acute disseminated encephalomyelitis after vaccination and spent over a year receiving hospital and neuro-rehabilitation care. His anticoagulation medication was not continued when he was discharged to community care, and he subsequently died from deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The principal concerns were unclear responsibility for venous thromboembolism risk assessments between hospitals and community organisations, and inadequate pathways for organisations to identify relevant NICE guidance.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clarity about VTE risk-assessment responsibilities at hospital-to-community discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “1) There seems to be a lack of clarity amongst health and care professionals (certainly those who gave evidence at this inquest) as to whether community organisations receiving patients following discharge from hospital (such as neurorehabilitation centres and care homes) should, as a routine part of their responsibilities, be performing VTE risk assessments. I was referred to NICE Guidance 89 (Venous thromboembolism in Over 16s: reducing the risk of hospital-acquired deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism – published March 2018, updated August 2019), which deals with VTE assessment and procedure for hospital patients, but there is no reference in this guidance to assessments in the community. There is reference in the guidance to patients about to be discharged (paragraph 1.2), but this appears to cover the practicalities of situations where a firm decision has already been made by hospital clinicians that anticoagulation will continue. I am concerned that hospital clinicians may not be routinely performing VTE assessments as part of discharge planning, on the basis that they believe such assessment will occur in the community placement. However, it is unclear whether (and, based on evidence heard at the inquest, unlikely that) many community organisations are performing such assessments, and instead most will be relying on hospitals to do this. I am concerned that, as a result, as happened to Andrew, some patients will not have their VTE risk considered when they move from being an in-patient to residing in a community setting. Consideration could be given to making the NICE guidance (NG 89) clearer in respect of the respective responsibilities placed on hospital and community organisations, when a patient is to be discharged from one to the other. Consideration could also be given to the desirability of separate guidance covering VTE risk assessment in community settings, and the potential importance of this to certain groups of patients, particularly those who are immobile and requiring long-term community care. ”

    Source location

    ANDREW ETLERED NICHOLS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the guideline for updates covering continuation of VTE prophylaxis and anticoagulation after discharge to community settings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To address this we propose to review the guideline to see if it can be updated to cover the issue of continuing VTE prophylaxis on discharge so that inpatient anticoagulation prescriptions for VTE prophylaxis are converted to ongoing anticoagulation where required, ensuring that the intention cannot be misinterpreted.”

    Source location

    Response from National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    Page 1 · response
    Published 6 November 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Consider providing implementation support on VTE risk assessments and discharge planning, focusing on anticoagulation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To further support the implementation of this guideline NICE’s implementation support team will consider the delivery of support on VTE risk assessments and discharge planning with a specific focus on anticoagulation.”

    Source location

    Response from National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    Page 1 · response
    Published 6 November 2023

    Open published response
  7. East Riding and Hull

    AI-generated summary

    Tracey Elizabeth Rose · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Tracey Elizabeth Rose suffered a right tibial plateau fracture and was discharged with a recommendation for six weeks of dalteparin, but missed up to three doses because of a dispensing issue. She was later admitted with a confirmed pulmonary embolism and died on 25 January 2023 after an embolectomy; the concern was that the missed anticoagulant doses may have significantly contributed to the pulmonary embolism.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to dispense prescribed dalteparin before discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) This woman was discharged home without her prescription of dalteparin being dispensed, also her last dose whilst in hospital may not have been given. Evidence was heard that missing up to three doses of this anticoagulant, in someone with increased risk factors for thromboembolic disease, may have significantly contributed to her developing a pulmonary embolism. ”

    Source location

    Tracey Elizabeth Rose · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Claire Twinn · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Claire Twinn, a 47-year-old woman with Down’s syndrome, severe learning disability, and complex heart and lung conditions, became unwell and attended hospital with low oxygen saturations and symptoms including cough, sickness, and diarrhoea. She was diagnosed with suspected bilateral pneumonia, discharged on oral antibiotics, and found deceased by her family the following morning. The principal concerns were that she was discharged rather than admitted for monitoring and oxygen therapy, reasonable adjustments and specialised learning disability nursing input were not provided, safety-netting advice was not recorded, and the chest X-ray report was delayed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record discharge and non-admission decisions concerning oxygen monitoring and remedial oxygen therapy

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Neither the trust decision to discharge Ms Twinn and not admit for continued monitoring of oxygen levels and remedial oxygen therapy, nor clear safety-netting advice to carers was recorded in the clinical record. ”

    Source location

    Claire Twinn · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Janet Irene SPENCER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Janet Irene Spencer suffered an unwitnessed fall in her assisted living accommodation on 30 August 2022, sustaining a traumatic acute subdural haematoma. She was treated in hospital and placed on end-of-life care, but did not recover and died some 13 days later; underlying ischaemic heart disease contributed to, but did not directly cause, her death. The report identified concerns about inadequate and outdated risk assessments and care plans during discharge or transfer, and insufficient information-sharing to support smooth transfers between care facilities.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure adequate and up-to-date risk assessments and care plans during discharge or transfer between care facilities

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The systems in place in respect of discharge to assess patients do not appear to ensure patients are discharged or transferred between care facilities with an adequate and up to date risk assessment and care plan in place. ”

    Source location

    Janet Irene SPENCER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold weekly Transfer of Care Hub audits and reflective discussions about hospital discharges and required improvements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “9. At a more operational level, the Transfer of Care Hubs hold weekly audits and reflective discussions of hospital discharges that have gone well or where improvements are required.”

    Source location

    Response from Nottinghamshire County Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 December 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement and use a referral and assessment process for Assessment Flat admissions, recording care needs, risks and medical information and sharing them with providers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “11. The LA recognises that improvements have been required in the clear and accurate sharing of up-to-date information for admission to the Assessment Flats, as illustrated by Mrs Spencer’s situation. To ensure that the risk of any future breakdown in communication is mitigated, a new process and referral / assessment form has been implemented for all people moving into Assessment Flat accommodation. This process is for hospital and community admissions into”

    Source location

    Response from Nottinghamshire County Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 December 2023

    Open published response
  10. Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton

    AI-generated summary

    Sebastian Harry DANIELS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sebastian Harry Daniels, who had paranoid schizophrenia and was treated with clozapine, developed severe hypertriglyceridemia and necrotising pancreatitis before dying from multiple organ failure on 4 July 2021. Concerns included the failure to escalate abnormal triglyceride results, unclear communication of required GP actions in hospital discharge summaries, delays in addressing identified deficiencies, and the requirement for patients taking clozapine to attend separate appointments for some blood tests.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of ED discharge summaries to clearly identify diagnoses and actions expected from GPs

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The RCA report identified that the format of discharge summaries provided to GPs by the ED department needed to be reviewed to ensure that actions to be undertaken by GPs were clearly identified. The results of this were to be audited. Following the inquest I was provided with an audit report. This report dated 13/9/21 revealed that the computer system could not be altered as had been hoped and therefore a change of practice was introduced instead. This required clinicians to document actions in a free text section with appropriate flagging for GPs. 20 cases were audited and only half met the standard national guidance and 8 lacked a clear diagnosis & details of what was expected from GPs. Hampshire Hospital Trust have informed me that further actions are being taken to address these deficiencies. However as it is now a year since the RCA report was prepared and over 2 years since Mr Daniel’s death I am concerned that this action is not being taken swiftly given the risks to patients. ”

    Source location

    Sebastian Harry DANIELS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require ED clinicians to document significant findings and matters requiring GP attention under a separate heading in discharge summaries.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “ED clinicians have also been notified that they are required to continue to document significant findings and matters requiring GP attention, under a separate heading within the GP free text notes box, on the Patient First discharge summary. It was felt that compliance of this, underpinned with documented audit, was likely limited due to the turnover of trainee doctors. In order to ensure that all staff remain aware of this requirement the Trust is in the process of updating its junior doctors induction program to include the above changes in the discharge process. This will take effect from the next induction taking place on 6 December 2023.”

    Source location

    Response from Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 26 September 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the junior doctors’ induction programme to include the revised discharge-process requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “ED clinicians have also been notified that they are required to continue to document significant findings and matters requiring GP attention, under a separate heading within the GP free text notes box, on the Patient First discharge summary. It was felt that compliance of this, underpinned with documented audit, was likely limited due to the turnover of trainee doctors. In order to ensure that all staff remain aware of this requirement the Trust is in the process of updating its junior doctors induction program to include the above changes in the discharge process. This will take effect from the next induction taking place on 6 December 2023.”

    Source location

    Response from Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 26 September 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Re-audit a random sample of discharge letters at three and six months to monitor the impact of the changes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to monitor the impact of these actions the Trust will re-audit a random sample of discharge letters at three and six months.”

    Source location

    Response from Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 26 September 2023

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026