Recurring concern

Unreliable recording of required observations in care and custody

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 23 Oct 2013•Latest report 19 May 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in recording required patient or prisoner observations, including inaccurate, delayed, anticipatory, incomplete or falsified entries, where records do not reliably reflect the observations performed. Includes paper, electronic and ACCT-related observation records across care and custody settings.

Not included

  • Excludes failures to perform or maintain the required observation itself where the recording process is not deficient.
  • Excludes unclear observation requirements, observation-level decisions and generic observation assurance or auditing where inaccurate or delayed recording is not the shared unsafe condition.
  • Excludes general clinical, care or custody record-keeping deficiencies unrelated to required observations.
  • Excludes recording of non-observation activities, such as searches, movements, inspections or clinical decisions, unless the assertion specifically concerns a required observation record.
Reports
83

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
90

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
181

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care8
HM Prison and Probation Service8
Care Quality Commission7
NHS England6
East London NHS Foundation Trust4
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust4
Ministry of Justice4
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board4
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust4
Barts Health NHS Trust3
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust3
North London NHS Foundation Trust3
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust2
Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust2
General Medical Council2

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Najib Ahmed NAAGI · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Najib Naagi was found unresponsive in his mental health hospital bed on 3 January 2025, was resuscitated, and died in intensive care the following day from natural causes. The report raises concerns that observations were not conducted at the required times and that the clinical support worker’s records did not accurately reflect the observations made, misleading the court and undermining confidence in patient records.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to accurately and contemporaneously record patient observations

    Wider context from the report

    “The clinical support worker who had been tasked with conducting Mr Naagi’s observations recorded that she had observed Mr Naagi at the following times: • 4.30am • 5.30am • 6.30am She reiterated that in her statement and in her oral evidence at inquest. She did not volunteer the fact that her record was wrong. It was only when I put it to her in quite robust terms that she accepted this. In fact, the ward CCTV showed that she looked through the observation panel at the following times: • 4.48am • 6.18am Thus, the record she made did not reflect the actions she took. The consequences of this are as follows: 1. A patient’s medical record was wrong. Any healthcare professional seeking to understand when Mr Naagi had been observed to be well by reading the record would have been given the wrong information. 2. The fact that this record was wrong casts doubt on the remainder of the record, both in terms of this individual (was he actually well at the times recorded?) and the other patients (were they observed when the record indicates that they were observed?). 3. The court was misled. Observations should be conducted when they are meant to be conducted, but if they are not then this fact must be recorded contemporaneously. It was put to me by the trust’s solicitor that because the clinical support worker later looked through the observation panel at 6.36am, this meant that the number of observations recorded was accurate and so the later observation somehow made good the lack of earlier observation and corrected the wrong recording. That is simply not the case. Proper patient care demands that patient records are accurate and not in any way fabricated. Regarding the giving of inaccurate evidence in court, this may amount to a contempt of court, it may amount to perjury, it may be punishable by a fine or even by a term of imprisonment. For your patients, it obstructs learning from deaths. ”

    Source location

    Najib Ahmed NAAGI · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor observation practice and documentation through audits, quality visits, safety huddles, senior reviews, and governance reporting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Compliance with observation practice and documentation standards will be reviewed through monthly observation audits, Matron quality visits and daily safety huddles, out-of-hours senior manager reviews and reporting through the Care Group Quality and Safety governance structure. Any themes and findings will be escalated further through the Trust’s governance arrangements where required.”

    Source location

    Response from North London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Amend the supportive observations policy and observation form to require and record each patient’s exact observation time.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As explained, the Trust recognises that the existing observation record form does not support staff to record observations contemporaneously. As a result, the Supportive Observations Policy has been amended to state that ‘staff must record the exact time that each patient is observed on every check, rather than relying solely on the hourly observation column. Accurate timings provide an auditable record of when observations took place and are essential for patient safety, incident investigations, CCTV reviews and other reviews of care. Recording a time that does not reflect when the observation occurred may constitute falsification of records and could result in disciplinary action’. In conjunction, the general observation form has been amended to allow staff to record the exact time they check each patient.”

    Source location

    Response from North London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response
  2. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Kiefer Kiam Bolangi Fraser-Phillips · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kiefer Kiam Bolangi Fraser-Phillips, who had treatment-resistant paranoid schizophrenia and several physical health conditions including sleep apnoea, was found deceased in bed at a mental health unit on 18 September 2025. The post-mortem medical cause of death was recorded as sudden unexplained death in schizophrenia. Concerns included incomplete recording of therapeutic observations because of Wi-Fi problems and the absence of a care plan addressing physical health risks associated with his medication and sleep apnoea.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record therapeutic observations accurately and effectively

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Staff had not been completing the comments section during therapeutic observations as the electronic device they used would drop Wi-Fi signal making it impossible to record the observations until they were back in the ward office. This creates a risk that observations are not being recorded accurately and effectively and creates a risk of future deaths. ”

    Source location

    Kiefer Kiam Bolangi Fraser-Phillips · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Survey ward Wi-Fi problems and explore and test clinically safe solutions for identified hotspots.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. A Survey has now been carried out on a number of the acute wards to understand the extent of the Wifi problems on the wards and ICT are exploring the best solution to resolve the issue where hot spots have been noted. Whilst this might seem like a straightforward problem to solve the ideal solution would be to move the receivers from above the ceilings but due to the nature of the clinical area that creates a ligature risk. Alternatives are currently being explored and the trust and will be tested to ensure efficacy for Wifi, as well as it being clinically safe to use with mitigations in place whilst this is completed.”

    Source location

    Response from Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 April 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide ward desktops and laptops for observation recording and remind staff to document observations while Wi-Fi issues are addressed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. Whilst a more permanent solution is finalised staff have access to desktops and laptops on the ward to input their observations. Staff have also been reminded of the importance of documenting their observations. Staff are being involved to ensure that the solution is sourced as a matter of urgency. I can assure you that the Trust will continue to review this matter until a satisfactory outcome is resolved.”

    Source location

    Response from Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 April 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct monthly audits of observation quality, address non-compliance, and report results to the Quality Assurance Group to identify and resolve systemic issues.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “During our investigations the Trust has also put into place actions to review the observations on the ward more closely, to ensure a high quality of observations. Monthly audits will now be taking place to review the quality of the observations. Actions will be taken where staff do not comply with policy and results of the audits will be taken to Quality Assurance Group for assurance, to ensure the Trust is providing the best care possible to our in-patients. This will also enable the Trust to monitor not just the quality of the observations but ensure if there are any systemic issues, these are raised and addressed immediately.”

    Source location

    Response from Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 17 April 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Moving ward Wi-Fi receivers above ceilings is not currently feasible because it would create a ligature risk.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. A Survey has now been carried out on a number of the acute wards to understand the extent of the Wifi problems on the wards and ICT are exploring the best solution to resolve the issue where hot spots have been noted. Whilst this might seem like a straightforward problem to solve the ideal solution would be to move the receivers from above the ceilings but due to the nature of the clinical area that creates a ligature risk. Alternatives are currently being explored and the trust and will be tested to ensure efficacy for Wifi, as well as it being clinically safe to use with mitigations in place whilst this is completed.”

    Source location

    Response from Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 April 2026

    Open published response
  3. Inner South London

    AI-generated summary

    Mark Robert Smith · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mark Robert Smith, who was detained at HMP Thameside, died after an epileptic seizure led to cardiac arrest. The report describes concerns about medication prescribing and administration, hospital-to-prison discharge and communication, access to his cell, observation arrangements and records, staffing, and the lack of equipment for resuscitation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure truthful observation records

    Wider context from the report

    “(5) I am concerned there were numerous missed and falsified observation entries in Mark’s case and how similar incidents can be prevented given the reliance on handwritten sheets being scanned onto the system at a later stage. I appreciate the efforts made with training and audits. (Practice Plus Group) ”

    Source location

    Mark Robert Smith · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 5 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Mujahid Adam · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mujahid Adam died by suicide after being found hanging in his prison cell on 15 March 2025; he was declared dead on 21 March 2025 at University College Hospital. The concerns included inadequate and non-contemporaneous recording of 15-minute observations, no clear definition of what constituted an observation, delays in calling Code Blue and cutting him down, and disrepair in the cell that allowed access to ligature material.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record 15-minute observations contemporaneously and accurately

    Wider context from the report

    “(a) The recording of observations of 15-minute checks is not contemporaneous and is prone to inaccuracy. It relies on a prison officer walking from the cell to the wing office to record observations, every 15 minutes, which may not be realistic if a prisoner has other duties to perform; ”

    Source location

    Mujahid Adam · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Contemporaneous ACCT observation recording is not feasible because staff cannot carry the document confidentially or without restricting their response to incidents.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Prisoners may require more frequent observations depending on their level of risk, which can be labour intensive for staff. As you have noted, staff do not carry the ACCT document with them when conducting an observation. This is to mitigate the risk of other prisoners becoming privy to sensitive information about the individual being supported. It is also impractical for a member of staff to carry a large document whilst conducting their duties as it would restrict their ability to respond effectively to any emerging incidents. Due to this, the documenting of observations cannot be contemporaneous and must be completed after the event. Staff are required to complete these observations and record them either immediately or as soon as practicable afterwards, alongside their other duties.”

    Source location

    2026-0125 - Response from HMPPS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 March 2026

    Open published response
  5. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Elise Kay Louise Sebastian · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Elise Kay Louise Sebastian tied a fatal ligature in her room on Longview Ward on 17 April 2021 and died two days later in hospital. The principal concerns included inadequate and falsified observations, insufficiently trained and staffed ward personnel, poor communication about ligaturing and self-harm, medication-recording errors, failures involving Oxevision, and other care and record-keeping deficiencies.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Falsification of patient observation records

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Mental Health Trust staff falsified Elise’s observation records and this was not identified by the Trust post-death investigation despite the availability of timings from Oxevision imaging. This matter arose in an inquest that significantly post-dated Elise’s death and there is concern that lessons had not been learned. The Trust internal investigation does not refer to this and these matters are arising with scrutiny within the inquest hearing. ”

    Source location

    Elise Kay Louise Sebastian · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Falsification of observation logs

    Wider context from the report

    “7. Oxevision imaging showed Elise entering her bedroom alone at approximately 18:10 hours and she remained in her room until she was found unresponsive at approximately 18:29. Elise’s observation logs for 17:30-18:30 on 17 April were falsified recording that Elise was in the communal area with checks completed at 17:30 17:40 17:50 18:00 18:10 and 18:20 recorded that Elise was present in the communal area. Elise was required to be on constant eyesight observations whilst in her bedroom. ”

    Source location

    Elise Kay Louise Sebastian · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 5 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to further investigate or monitor falsified observation records

    Wider context from the report

    “8. The mental health Trust were on notice that staff must have falsified the observations logs for Elise in 2021. Another inquest for a St. Aubyn’s patient who died on 12 July 2022, also found that observation logs were falsified and contained errors. Trust staff falsification of records were not further investigated or monitored after Elise’s death at St. Aubyn’s Centre. ”

    Source location

    Elise Kay Louise Sebastian · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 5 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Further develop PSIIR support and quality-check tools, including detailed investigation checklists, care-team confirmation and organisational sign-off checks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Proposed Improvement in PSIIs”

    Source location

    2026-0078 - Response from Essex University Partnership Trust
    Page 9 · response
    Published 13 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The concern is factually incorrect because the 2022 inquest concerned a Derwent Centre patient, not a St Aubyn’s Centre patient.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Concern 8) The mental health Trust were on notice that staff must falsify the observations logs for Elise in 2021. Another inquest for a St. Aubyn’s patient who died on 12 July 2022, also found that observation logs were falsified and contained errors. Trust staff falsification of records were not further investigated or monitored after Elise’s death at St. Aubyn’s Centre.”

    Source location

    2026-0078 - Response from Essex University Partnership Trust
    Page 11 · response
    Published 13 February 2026

    Open published response
  6. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Stephen John Neville · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Stephen John Neville, aged 68, was an informal inpatient at Beech Ward for planned ECT after a history of severe treatment-resistant depression, anxiety, agitation, and repeated suicide attempts. He died by hanging while in hospital. The report identified concerns including failures in risk communication and assessment, abrupt medication changes, inadequate therapeutic observations and engagement, insufficient auditing and quality assurance, and failure to mitigate risks associated with an unlocked shower room.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record therapeutic engagement and interaction during observations

    Wider context from the report

    “1. There was a failure on the part of EPUT nursing and (particularly) support staff to appropriately undertake and record the required therapeutic engagement and interaction observations. Members of support staff demonstrably misunderstood (and appear to still misunderstand) the nature and purpose of Level 2 ‘intermittent’ (4 to 5 times) hourly observations, apparently routinely conducting such observations every 15 minutes on the hour, the quarter past and so on. Whilst the observations, when made, recorded the location of the patient and (very occasionally) noted what the patient may be doing, nothing was recorded in respect of an interaction or therapeutic engagement, as required by Trust policy. Such a lack of understanding of the basic role of the support worker and/or nursing staff in undertaking such critically important roles disclosed an (on-going) deficit in training. 2. Further, the clear evidence also disclosed an on-going failure in the quality assurance and auditing processes deployed by EPUT. A purported weekly quality assurance check being undertaken by the Ward Manager in December 2021, which claimed “an audit score of 100%”, was entirely at odds with the evidence at inquest which revealed repeated and significant inadequacies in the nature and quality of the observations undertaken and recorded. 3. Of even greater concern is that even after the move from paper to electronic observation records the same Beech Ward Manager (then and now) stated in evidence: “I have no audit tool …. I am not confident that the audits are accurate and complete now … there is no audit process in place to check the quality of observation and engagement documentation.” 4. The Deputy Director of Quality and Safety (Inpatient and Urgent Care) recognised in her written and oral evidence that the available free text box now included on the electronic version of the records relating to observation and engagement is “not a mandatory field” in the recording process and that: “it appears that at some point the Tendable audits were amended to omit the audits of the quality and nature of the observation records.” 5. It remains unclear how (or why) this came about, and I am very concerned that the apparent reliance on staff supervision (as per paragraph 7.1 of the Therapeutic Engagement and Supportive Observation Clinical Guideline (Inpatients)) and staff handovers to rigorously audit the nature and quality of the conduct and recording of therapeutic engagement and supportive observations remains a wholly inadequate mechanism for the purposes of achieving appropriate qualitative compliance monitoring. 6. The lacuna identified above gives rise to a real concern regarding the robustness of EPUT quality assurance and auditing processes generally, and particularly in the context of the on-going issues relating to the nature and quality of the conduct by EPUT staff of such critically important observations including the essential therapeutic engagements and interactions, with highly vulnerable inpatients at risk of suicide. This is a concern, I am told, also shared by the Deputy Director quoted above. ”

    Source location

    Stephen John Neville · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to require completion of the electronic observation and engagement record field

    Wider context from the report

    “4. The Deputy Director of Quality and Safety (Inpatient and Urgent Care) recognised in her written and oral evidence that the available free text box now included on the electronic version of the records relating to observation and engagement is “not a mandatory field” in the recording process and that: “it appears that at some point the Tendable audits were amended to omit the audits of the quality and nature of the observation records.” ”

    Source location

    Stephen John Neville · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Shift observation practice toward therapeutic engagement through updated guidance and training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Response: In line with the details set out in the Trust’s learning statement filed with the Court, with respect to the Trust’s approach to Observation and Engagement, the Trust continues to shift focus to Therapeutic engagement rather than observation alone. This aligns with the national working group the Trust participated in across 2024 and led to the development of the Mental Health / Learning Disability Nurse Director guidance document.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Check all staff Observation and Engagement competencies and completion of Oxevision e-observation training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Ward Manager has also undertaken a check of all staff Observation and Engagement competencies to ensure confidence in current staff practice. As part of this process the Ward Manager checked that all staff have completed Oxevision E-Observation training, which includes training on documenting o-benservations to ensure therapeutic engagement is captured. This ensures a focus on the quality of the therapeutic engagement and observation.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver focused face-to-face training on interpreting observations, recording therapeutic engagement and reflecting on learning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To further enhance Trust routine online training, the Ward Manager is providing a number of focused face to face training sessions with ward staff to further gain assurance around interpretation and understanding. This will include highlighting the importance of recording therapeutic engagement and space for reflection on learning. This is due to be completed by the end of December 2025.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share inquest learning with care-unit quality and safety forums and the Training team to strengthen Oxevision engagement and recording training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of the Trustwide learning response, the learning from this inquest has been shared through the care unit quality and safety meeting to ensure shared learning across the wider care unit. This has also been shared with the Training team with a specific focus on Oxevision e-observation training to ensure this training robustly guides staff on engagement techniques and importance of the quality of recording of the engagement. This training was reviewed in February 2025 following the Trust’s recent review of the Oxevision SOP.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Pursue making the electronic engagement field mandatory for level 2, 3 and 4 observations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Finally, it is noted that the e-observations box on the electronic form is the same box wherein engagement would also be documented and is not a mandatory field. A request has been made to Oxehealth asking for this to be mandated box for all observations levels 2, 3 and 4. Oxehealth have confirmed this is achievable and this change is in progress.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review Tendable audit templates within the wider Trust audit-assurance process.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have also reviewed the audit templates within our tenable system to ensure the quality of this process is now reviewed as part of the trust wider audit assurance process, this alongside making the commentary box within observation recording a mandatory field has considerably strengthened our trust assurance on this matter.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response
  7. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Name not published · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    ████████ was detained under the Mental Health Act and admitted to psychiatric wards at the Tower Hamlets Centre for Mental Health before being found unresponsive in a patient room on 7 June 2022; her death was verified later that day. The jury identified several contributing factors, including a non-functioning door-locking system and shortcomings in patient observations. Further concerns included risk assessment, staff understanding and attitudes towards risk, auditing, and clinical oversight.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to conduct and record patient observations accurately, sufficiently and therapeutically

    Wider context from the report

    “1) Patient Observations (generally) I am aware that, prior to ████████ final admission under the care of the Trust in 2022, other concerns had been raised by a coroner regarding patient observations within the Trust. Those concerns were first raised in 2021 (following a patient death in 2018). Concerns included the quality of observations and the falsification of observations. Despite assurances from the Trust in numerous action plans since, the evidence in this inquest revealed widespread concerns across two wards at THCMH (Brick Lane Ward and Rosebank Ward) about observations that were carried out. Such concerns included: the level of detail in observation records not meeting the expectations of the Trust’s own policy; the accuracy of timing’s in some observations was questionable; observations were often not used as a tool to aid therapeutic engagement with patients; and some observations were inaccurate or possibly falsified. The evidence received and heard during the inquest did not reassure me that this matter has been adequately addressed. Given the importance of observations in keeping patients safe, I remain concerned that significant risks remain. ”

    Source location

    Name not published · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use board relays to improve observation practices and therapeutic engagement.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I would like to draw your attention to an article published in the International Journal for Quality in Healthcare shortly after ████████ inquest took place, where the results of some of the Trust’s interventions to improve observation practices have been quantified. Observation completion and therapeutic engagement were shown to have improved following the introduction of zonal observations, a board relay, and life skills activities led by recovery workers. Sustained improvements were seen in all 10 measures used in this work, as evidenced by shifts in statistical process control charts. General observation completion increased by 1.2% (to 99.57%), and intermittent observation completion rose by 1.9% (to 98.25%). Incidents of physical violence were reduced by 23%, verbal aggression by 38% and racial aggression by 60%.”

    Source location

    Response from East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update mobile-phone policy requirements for staff working in clinical areas.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The member of staff in question has had their knowledge refreshed about the expectations of the Trust’s observations policy and the Trust’s mobile phone policy. The latter was updated in 2024 to include material on staff use of mobile phones, making it clear that they are not allowed in clinical areas unless there is an exceptional reason agreed with a local manager. There has been shared learning with all staff across the unit on the use of mobile phones whilst on duty, in 2024.”

    Source location

    Response from East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 2 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver shared learning to unit staff on mobile-phone use while on duty.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The member of staff in question has had their knowledge refreshed about the expectations of the Trust’s observations policy and the Trust’s mobile phone policy. The latter was updated in 2024 to include material on staff use of mobile phones, making it clear that they are not allowed in clinical areas unless there is an exceptional reason agreed with a local manager. There has been shared learning with all staff across the unit on the use of mobile phones whilst on duty, in 2024.”

    Source location

    Response from East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 2 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce CCTV auditing of recorded observations after completing staff training on footage access.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust is moving towards using CCTV to objectively audit whether observations have been made as recorded. This is anticipated to commence in January 2026 to allow for staff training to download and access CCTV footage.”

    Source location

    Response from East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 2 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    No further action is considered necessary because considerable work has addressed the identified concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I have addressed these in turn below. Please note that in respect of Concerns 2, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 the Trust entirely acknowledges the reasons for your concerns and has considered them extremely”

    Source location

    Response from East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 December 2025

    Open published response
  8. Kent and Medway

    AI-generated summary

    Michael Pugh · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Michael Pugh was found dead in his prison cell on 29 June 2024 while subject to an ACCT. No observations were carried out between 07.22 and 09.57 on the day he was discovered, and the record was completed retrospectively; concerns also included new officers’ incomplete understanding of the ACCT observation and recording requirements.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to carry out and record ACCT observations at unpredictable times

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The prison officers who gave evidence in relation to observations on 28th and 29th June 2024 were relatively new recruits, one having 3 months experience following POEL training and the other 1 month experience. Both officers gave evidence that following their POEL training their understanding of the ACCT process was incomplete; one stating “observations were explained but I didn’t have a fair idea what to do or how to undergo the process”, another stating “I didn’t understand the importance of observing a prisoner at unpredictable times. Even though I was told the observations should be hourly it was not explained to me how to stagger timing. I misunderstood what was required of me in recording the details when I recorded them as having happened at 13.00, 14.00, 15.00 and 16.00. ”

    Source location

    Michael Pugh · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide all new prison officers with a full day of suicide and self-harm prevention training, including ACCT procedures and observation recording requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All new members of staff receive a full day of training on suicide and self-harm prevention during their POELT training. This includes training on the ACCT process and the appropriate timings and intervals of when ACCT observations need to be carried out and recorded. Following completion of POELT training, new entry officers have a two week local induction before ‘going live’ and becoming fully operational. Part of this local induction programme at Swaleside includes ACCT upskilling and a session based on completion of ACCT documents and recording of ACCT observations. The local training team keep a record of these sessions. Any further training needs for staff would be identified and delivered locally.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide role-specific ACCT training to staff undertaking key ACCT case-management roles, including assessors and case coordinators.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Additionally, any member of staff who undertakes a key role relating to ACCT case management, for example ACCT assessors or case co-ordinators, receives training specific to these roles.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain an online Safety Learning Reference Library with ACCT guidance, templates, training materials and observation-recording resources accessible to staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to the training HMPPS has an online Safety Learning Reference Library which holds various guidance, templates and training material, all of which are accessible to all staff via the HMPPS intranet. The library includes an area dedicated to ACCT where staff can access a ‘Recording Observations’ video guide as well as a written guide, both of which”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Promote the Safety Learning Reference Library to new staff during induction and signpost it to all staff during the next national safety focus initiative.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “include examples of best practice for carrying out ACCT observations. Going forward HMP Swaleside will promote the Safety Learning Reference Library to new members of staff during their induction and, furthermore, will signpost the Safety Learning Reference Library to all staff during the HMPPS annual national safety focus initiative being held next month.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 July 2025

    Open published response
  9. Blackpool and the Fylde

    AI-generated summary

    Keith Ineson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Keith Ineson, a resident at Glenroyd Care Home, suffered an unwitnessed fall on 26 April 2024 and was subsequently treated for a fractured hip. Following surgery, he suffered a choking episode, developed aspiration pneumonia and died at Blackpool Victoria Hospital on 6 May 2024. The principal concern was that observation scores taken after the fall were not all recorded, leaving gaps in the information available to assess whether escalation to medical services was needed and creating a risk of further death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record all post-fall observation scores

    Wider context from the report

    “It was noted in the evidence, that the observation scores taken for Mr Ineson following his fall had not all been recorded in Mr Ineson’s care notes. This left a gap in the evidence as to reviewing the need for escalation to medical services after the fall. I received from witnesses who gave evidence before me, helpful assistance concerning several issues about learning and changes that had been made following Mr Ineson’s death. I could not identify changes to the record keeping system though, and as such found that the issue around the absence of recording observation scores following a fall gave rise to a risk of further death. This was because the record keeping was inaccurate, contained gaps in the information, and engaged my duty under paragraph 7, Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. ”

    Source location

    Keith Ineson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the EnabLE digital care-planning system for scheduled post-fall observations, alerts and point-of-care recording.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Learned Coroner will recall that in addition to the actions undertaken which were set out in the action plan submitted prior to the inquest, ████████, the Registered Manager of Glenroyd Care Home explained that Barchester has implemented a new digital care planning system called EnabLE which provides Barchester healthcare services with the ability to set up planned post fall interaction scheduled observations that can be recorded at the point of care to ensure accuracy and eliminate the risk of absent recordings. The system is relatively new, and we have completed some additional training with staff and themed supervisions, to ensure they know how to add to the scheduled observations. We are auditing the use of the systems – see below.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver targeted training and supervision on post-fall documentation, escalation, observation recording and lessons learned from the incident.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following the Inquest, Barchester revisited the issue of recording of all resident interactions and observations to ensure this is undertaken clearly, consistently and contemporaneously. We acknowledge that there was a need to improve the accuracy and regularity of record keeping. We have taken appropriate action in relation to training and technology to ensure that all interactions with patients are recorded.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide documentation prompt sheets to support completion of post-fall records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to the training programme and support staff are provided with an added prompt sheet to support them in the completion of documentation. This is part of a “belt and braces” approach to training.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue EnabLE drop-in support, documentation audits and remote monitoring for adherence and learning needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of the continuing programme of learning the region’s EnabLE champion who supports the home with EnabLE will continue with the provision of drop-in sessions, documentation audit and will continue to monitor remotely for any trends in learning needed around the digital system to ensure adherence to the actions triggered in the new system.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete NEWS2, RESTORE and sepsis training and themed supervision for recognising deteriorating residents.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our new digital system limits any opportunities missing entries in relation to observations. Our observations are recorded on the digital system in a NEWS2 (National Early Warning Score) observation record, rather than manually written. The training for this has been completed in the home, and we also have oversight by the regional Clinical Development Nurse who supports all her homes monthly and looks at the system to make sure everything is recorded as it should be.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete induction, including NEWS2 training, for three new bank nurses.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The training statistics for the home are 100% for NEWS2 in the home which ensures the accuracy, frequency and consistency of recording observations. Every Nurse, Senior carer and Care Practitioner has completed NEWS2 training, and three new bank nurses are in the process of completing their induction of which NEWS2 is part of the process. All NEWS2 training is completed on induction into the home, we have checked the recorded dates of NEWS2 training, and the dates have been recorded in the Learning Management system.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the falls policy with clinical staff and reinforce procedures for responding and escalating after falls.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Further, lessons learned as stated above, include correct moving & handling techniques. The falls policy has been reviewed by all clinical staff to ensure that everyone is aware of the policy and procedure following a fall (supported by the NEWS2 and RESTORE training above) therefore any need for escalation to medical services following a patient’s fall will be abundantly clear. The prompt sheets and guides created give an oversight of completion and can be checked by management, thereby mitigating the risk of the recording of inaccurate and irregular observations.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 5 · response
    Published 29 May 2025

    Open published response
  10. Cumbria

    AI-generated summary

    Sarah Kathleen Hill · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sarah Kathleen Hill was admitted for an elective ERCP to remove gallstones and developed worsening pancreatitis, perforation, multi-organ failure and cardiac arrest before dying in the early hours of 8 November 2024. Concerns included inadequate falls-risk assessment and reporting, insufficient documentation and monitoring, poor observability in a side room, and understaffing despite escalation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of frequent recorded observations for deteriorating patients

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) There was a lack of frequent recorded observations necessitated by Mrs Hill's deteriorating condition. ”

    Source location

    Sarah Kathleen Hill · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete an urgent assurance check of falls documentation and current AMU patient monitoring.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Immediate Assurance Check: An urgent assurance check on falls documentation and current patient monitoring on AMU is being completed to confirm improved compliance post-incident. Additionally, the ward has an established programme of work to undertake thematic reviews of falls related incidents (including collapses) on a quarterly basis to determine quality improvement plans and identify any new themes that ought to be shared with other teams or added to our Falls Trust Wide Improvement Plan.”

    Source location

    Response from North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Explore electronic-health-record dashboard options for real-time observation flagging and escalation alerts.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Deteriorating Patient Dashboard: Options are to be explored to enhance real-time flagging systems within the electronic health record, including escalation alerts visible to nurses and medical clinicians if observations fall below safe thresholds.”

    Source location

    Response from North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 17 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a cohort-based care model for admission-ward patients with elevated NEWS2 scores and assess it for wider rollout.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Cohort Monitoring: A pilot of a cohort-based care model for patients on the admission ward with elevated NEW2 scores is under development and if successful will be rolled out to other acute admission wards. This will allow greater visibility of patient’s with a dedicated nurse for the area/room. Prioritise use of rooms 1-6 which are closer to the front of the ward and doctor hub room.”

    Source location

    Response from North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 17 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Four-hourly observations initially complied with NEWS2 policy because the recorded scores did not trigger increased monitoring, despite later missed observations and escalation failures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following Mrs Hill’s ERCP procedure on 5 November 2024, she was admitted to the AMU at 19:00 hours with a diagnosis of post-ERCP pancreatitis based on a significantly raised amylase level. Mrs Hill’s condition initially appeared stable, with a planned 4-hourly National Early Warning Score (NEWS 2) in response to the score of 0-1 due to temperature 38.2°C on 6 November 2024. In line with the Trust policy (4-6 hourly observations for the first 48 hours unless NEWS2 triggers a change/escalation), the vital signs monitoring remained at 4 hourly.”

    Source location

    Response from North Cumbria Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 June 2025

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026