Recurring concern

Unreliable recording of required observations in care and custody

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 23 Oct 2013•Latest report 19 May 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in recording required patient or prisoner observations, including inaccurate, delayed, anticipatory, incomplete or falsified entries, where records do not reliably reflect the observations performed. Includes paper, electronic and ACCT-related observation records across care and custody settings.

Not included

  • Excludes failures to perform or maintain the required observation itself where the recording process is not deficient.
  • Excludes unclear observation requirements, observation-level decisions and generic observation assurance or auditing where inaccurate or delayed recording is not the shared unsafe condition.
  • Excludes general clinical, care or custody record-keeping deficiencies unrelated to required observations.
  • Excludes recording of non-observation activities, such as searches, movements, inspections or clinical decisions, unless the assertion specifically concerns a required observation record.
Reports
83

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
90

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
181

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care8
HM Prison and Probation Service8
Care Quality Commission7
NHS England6
East London NHS Foundation Trust4
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust4
Ministry of Justice4
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board4
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust4
Barts Health NHS Trust3
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust3
North London NHS Foundation Trust3
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust2
Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust2
General Medical Council2

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Eldine Loretta Lashley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Eldine Loretta Lashley suffered an unwitnessed fall at a care home on 6 April 2021, sustaining a subdural haemorrhage, and died at home on 14 April 2021 despite medical intervention. Concerns were raised that her mobility care plan was not updated to reflect increased monitoring needs and that progress notes did not accurately record the frequency of checks carried out.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to accurately record the frequency of checks in progress notes

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Mrs Lashley's mobility care plan was not updated in response to developments in her care needs – specifically she need to observe her more frequently than once per hour. 2. Progress notes created by nursing and care staff did not accurately reflect the frequency of checks carried out on Mrs Lashley. ”

    Source location

    Eldine Loretta Lashley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Rohan Dayal Singh · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Rohan Dayal Singh died on a mental health ward on 13 December 2018 after being found unresponsive following rapid tranquillisation. He had retained dangerous contraband, including controlled drugs and a bracelet concealing a blade, despite searches. Fifteen-minute observation records were falsified, and required monitoring and documentation after rapid tranquillisation were not completed; the jury found that the failure to monitor contributed to his death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain accurate records of clinical observations

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Mr Singh was subject to intermittent observations at 15 minute intervals during his admission. The records of these observations were found to be unreliable, staff accepted that they had failed to undertake observations and made false records, further they had done so in such circumstances that their peers were aware of the falsehood. A culture of impunity existed where inaccurate and misleading recording of clinical records was tolerated. ”

    Source location

    Rohan Dayal Singh · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide medical-record-keeping training to Borough Lead Nurses and cascade the learning to staff during induction and away days.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Two half day training sessions will be provided to the Borough Lead Nurses on medical record keeping by the Trust’s external solicitors within the next 6 months. The training will focus on the legal standard expected for documenting medical practice (especially in relation to observations) and will ensure staff understand when retrospective entries are and are not appropriate and what comprises a misleading record.”

    Source location

    2021-0134-Response-from-East-London-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
    Page 4 · response
    Published 5 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and roll out an electronic observations system enabling real-time recording of patient observations in RIO.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust is developing an e-observation (e-obs) recording system to replace the current paper-based system. The intention is that, staff will carry an iPad with direct links to RIO so they can enter patient records in real time. It is expected that this will improve the timeliness and accuracy of observations. A full project plan will be completed by the end of July with anticipated roll out throughout each hospital site from early Autumn 2021.”

    Source location

    2021-0134-Response-from-East-London-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
    Page 4 · response
    Published 5 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Professional concerns about nurses’ conduct and registration are for the NMC to investigate and sanction.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) have informed the Department it will be providing a separate response to you in relation to this case. The NMC code of practice² sets out the professional standards that nurses, midwives and nursing associates must uphold in order to be registered to practise in the UK.”

    Source location

    2021-0134-Response-from-Department-of-Health-Social-Care_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 May 2021

    Open published response
  3. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Paul Sartori · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Paul Sartori sought emergency medical assistance for chest pain on 24 October 2019, was directed from A&E to an urgent care centre, diagnosed with costochondritis, and later died at home on 27 October 2019 after becoming unresponsive. A post-mortem examination found a ruptured dissecting aortic aneurysm. The report raised systemic concerns about awareness and diagnosis of aortic dissection in emergency departments, including the adequacy of current guidance and risk-scoring tools.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record a full set of observations, including a pain score, before diverting patients from A&E

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The nurse making the decision to re-direct Mr Sartori from A&E did not record a full set of observations, to include a pain score, prior to diverting Mr Sartori from the A & E department. The nurse did not document her decision making process and rationale for redirecting Mr Sartori from A&E. ”

    Source location

    Mr Paul Sartori · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add vital signs, pain score and diversion-decision rationale to ambulance pre-arrival documentation at Whipps Cross, with random manual auditing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Regarding the second matter of concern Whipps Cross will ensure that the pre-arrival documentation made on CRS when ambulances arrive includes documentation supporting any decision to divert the patient to the Urgent Care Centre. This will include vital signs observations and pain score and will be implemented by 15th June. A process to do this at other Barts Health Emergency Departments is already in place.”

    Source location

    2021-0123-Response-from-Royal-London-Hospital-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 April 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing documentation processes at other Barts Health Emergency Departments are considered sufficient for recording decisions to divert patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Regarding the second matter of concern Whipps Cross will ensure that the pre-arrival documentation made on CRS when ambulances arrive includes documentation supporting any decision to divert the patient to the Urgent Care Centre. This will include vital signs observations and pain score and will be implemented by 15th June. A process to do this at other Barts Health Emergency Departments is already in place.”

    Source location

    2021-0123-Response-from-Royal-London-Hospital-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 April 2021

    Open published response
  4. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Raymond Alfred POWELL · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Raymond Alfred POWELL became increasingly frail, moved into Cole Valley Nursing Home, and suffered falls on 3 November 2020 that caused an acute subdural haematoma. He later developed an infection and seizure and died on 5 December 2020. Concerns included failures to record a preceding fall, update his falls risk assessment, accurately document observations, formally review the circumstances, and comply with court orders for evidence, creating an ongoing risk to other residents.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Misleading recording of resident observation intervals

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) On 3 November staff were observing Raymond every 15 minutes however they only endorsed the 30 minute boxes on his observation log meaning it was misleading. ”

    Source location

    Raymond Alfred POWELL · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement and maintain a centralized post-fall protocol folder containing guidance, a NEWS chart, and a timed observation log.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. The Manager has reviewed current documentation regarding post falls reporting and observing. The manager agrees that post documentation protocols was not substantial and did not accurately reflect the observations that took place on the day, so has implemented a new robust post falls protocol folder for the nursing team. This is allocated in one place and therefore nurses can easily access documents. This protocol now gives guidance and clear direction to follow. This protocol also has a NEWS chart that is included within this pack and a timed observation log post fall. Regarding the previous fall, the manager has reviewed archived documentation but is unable to locate any documentation to support the reported preceding fall on or around the 15th October 2021. The manager has spoken to ████████ about this concern.”

    Source location

    2021-0089-Response-from-Cole-Valley-Nursing-Home-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 March 2021

    Open published response
  5. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Philip Taylor · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Philip Taylor, who had Lewy Body Dementia and lived in a residential care home, became severely dehydrated during a chest infection and died in hospital on 6 January 2020 after developing an acute kidney injury. Concerns included failure to recognise and respond to dehydration, delayed ambulance transfer and hospital assessment, inadequate monitoring, and limited national guidance for care home staff and paramedics.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays and omissions in recording GP visit observations

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Mr Taylor was seen by a GP the day before he died. His risk of dehydration was not recognised. The precise observations of the GP were difficult to ascertain at the inquest for a number of reasons. • The inquest was told that the GP had been called as the care home had concerns about Mr Taylor. However, the GP did not ascertain his temperature because the inquest was told that he did not routinely carry or use a thermometer when he saw patients in a care home. The explanation provided to the inquest was that as a GP he did was not equipped with medical gadgets in the way for example NWAS staff were. • The notes relating to the visit had not been written up until the next day and the GP could not recall all of any observations. It was unclear why that had occurred. ”

    Source location

    Philip Taylor · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ensure appropriate checks that the GP carries basic equipment and updates records at consultation where possible.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am mindful that steps taken now cannot undo what happened in this case, and I am satisfied that from a clinical perspective, the failure to carry equipment / update records did not impact on the outcome for this gentleman. However my expectation is that all Stockport GPs do carry basic equipment to enable the recording of clinical observations and for patient records to be updated at the point of consultation, wherever possible. I am sorry that this did not happen in this case and I will ensure that appropriate checks are made to ensure that Dr ████████ adheres to this standard of practice.”

    Source location

    2020-0289-Response-from-NHS-Stockport-CCG-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 January 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The failure to carry equipment and update records did not impact the patient's outcome.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am mindful that steps taken now cannot undo what happened in this case, and I am satisfied that from a clinical perspective, the failure to carry equipment / update records did not impact on the outcome for this gentleman. However my expectation is that all Stockport GPs do carry basic equipment to enable the recording of clinical observations and for patient records to be updated at the point of consultation, wherever possible. I am sorry that this did not happen in this case and I will ensure that appropriate checks are made to ensure that Dr ████████ adheres to this standard of practice.”

    Source location

    2020-0289-Response-from-NHS-Stockport-CCG-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 January 2021

    Open published response
  6. Blackpool and the Fylde

    AI-generated summary

    Douglas OWENS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Douglas Robert Owens developed acute cardiac failure, hypotension, aspiration pneumonia and multi-organ failure after cataract surgery, treatment for raised intraocular pressure, ongoing eye pain and painful urinary retention. He died in intensive care on 7 July 2018. Concerns included arrangements for urgent ophthalmic transfer, specialist assessment, monitoring and review of deterioration, fluid documentation, and recording medication doses.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record vital signs observations in the observation chart

    Wider context from the report

    “(3)That the evidence disclosed omissions in the taking of vital signs observations and in the recording of observations in the vital signs observation chart (incorporating the National Early Warning Score). Unless action is taken, there is a risk that any deterioration in the condition of patients which might put their lives at risk will not be identified at the earliest opportunity. ”

    Source location

    Douglas OWENS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor NEWS2 chart completion through ward-level spot audits, immediate gap management and shared-learning governance discussions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Furthermore, the Trust monitors completion of the NEWS2 charts through spot audits undertaken by the Matrons and Ward Managers, with any gaps identified managed immediately at ward level and key themes are discussed at Nursing Quality Governance Meetings, with actions created for shared learning.”

    Source location

    2020-0210-Response-from-Blackpool-Teaching-Hospitals_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 December 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct regular Emergency Department spot audits and huddles to verify NEWS2 recording, prompt escalation and completion of fluid charts.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the interim, the Head of the Emergency Department and the Matron will ensure senior clinical staff will undertake regular spot audits / huddles, to ensure all patients in the ED have their NEWS2 score recorded correctly, that any changes in score are acted upon promptly and that fluid charts are completed correctly and acted upon promptly. The ED complete a Consistency in Care Audit daily, where 40 patients’ notes (approximately 20% of all patients daily) are reviewed in real time and this includes a review of the NEWS 2 and fluid balance. This is used to monitor the compliance and manage any inconsistencies in care at the time. Additionally the ED undertakes an intentional round, where all patients who have been in the department for longer than 4 hours, are reviewed by the EPIC (Emergency Physician in Charge) to ensure that appropriate plans of care are in place.”

    Source location

    2020-0210-Response-from-Blackpool-Teaching-Hospitals_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 December 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete daily real-time Consistency in Care Audits reviewing NEWS2 and fluid-balance compliance and manage identified inconsistencies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the interim, the Head of the Emergency Department and the Matron will ensure senior clinical staff will undertake regular spot audits / huddles, to ensure all patients in the ED have their NEWS2 score recorded correctly, that any changes in score are acted upon promptly and that fluid charts are completed correctly and acted upon promptly. The ED complete a Consistency in Care Audit daily, where 40 patients’ notes (approximately 20% of all patients daily) are reviewed in real time and this includes a review of the NEWS 2 and fluid balance. This is used to monitor the compliance and manage any inconsistencies in care at the time. Additionally the ED undertakes an intentional round, where all patients who have been in the department for longer than 4 hours, are reviewed by the EPIC (Emergency Physician in Charge) to ensure that appropriate plans of care are in place.”

    Source location

    2020-0210-Response-from-Blackpool-Teaching-Hospitals_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 December 2020

    Open published response
  7. Black Country

    AI-generated summary

    Edna May Davenport · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Edna May Davenport, a resident of Oak Court House residential care home, sustained head injuries during an unwitnessed assault by another resident and died in hospital on 12 December 2019. The report raised concerns about the removal of her alarm without documented alternative arrangements, inadequate recording and monitoring of observations, insufficient risk assessment of the other resident, and delays in responding to signs of head injury and deterioration.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record the timing and findings of resident observations

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) I heard evidence that the deceased was subject to hourly observations but that these observations were not recorded as to when they actually took place or what was observed. Therefore, it was not possible to ascertain how long the other resident had been in the room with the deceased or how long the assault went on for; ”

    Source location

    Edna May Davenport · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. South Yorkshire (Eastern)

    AI-generated summary

    Daniel AKAM · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Daniel Akam, a vulnerable prisoner with a history of depression, self-harm, low mood and anxiety, was found unresponsive in his cell with a rope ligature around his neck and was declared deceased. The report identified concerns about an inadequate final ACCT review, missed and inaccurately recorded observations, and inadequate ACCT training for prison officers.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to accurately record ACCT observations in the ACCT document

    Wider context from the report

    “Failure to carry out ACCT observations recorded in the ACCT log (1) CCTV evidence in the inquest established that 18 observations on Mr Akam were not carried out. (2) The same 18 missed observations were recorded in the ACCT document as having been carried out, when they had not been. (3) Five different prison officers purportedly signed various of these entries. (4) Whilst the above missed observations occurred 24 hours prior to Daniel Akam’s death and were not contributory, the purpose of ACCT observations is to reduce the risk of suicide and self-harm in a vulnerable prisoner. If necessary observations are missed, the risk of suicide and self-harm amongst vulnerable prisoners will likely increase. (5) The fact that the five separate officers did not carry out observations, when they recorded that they did, indicates that the problem is systemic. ”

    Source location

    Daniel AKAM · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Gary Leyland · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Gary Leyland was found deceased in his supported accommodation on 13 November 2019 after taking excessive prescribed medication, with the inquest conclusion recording suicide and morphine toxicity. Concerns included failures to contact medical or mental health services after suicidal thoughts were disclosed, poor documentation and handover information, the use of security staff for welfare checks without clear evidence of training, and the absence of an updated risk assessment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain complete and reliable welfare-check records

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Documentation and Recording of Information - during the course of the Inquest the Court was provided with and taken to various documents and records relating to Mr Leyland. The Court found the recording and documentation to be of a poor quality and standard. The chronology document was not complete, information as to when Mr Leyland had been seen was missing. The observational log was completed in some instances with the use of an X as opposed to the staff members initials so it was not clear if he had been seen and if so by whom. ”

    Source location

    Mr Gary Leyland · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Bedfordshire and Luton

    AI-generated summary

    Pamela Evans · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Pamela Evans, aged 87, fell and hit her head at Bedford Hospital after becoming dizzy while walking to the toilet, and died on 4 November 2018 from a large right-sided acute on chronic subdural haematoma. Concerns included inconsistent understanding among nurses about when to call the critical care outreach team, limited action that team could initially take, errors in recording her NEWS, and failures to identify these issues through the Trust’s serious incident investigation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to accurately record NEWS observations and scores

    Wider context from the report

    “(iv)      Incorrect recording of this patient’s NEWS and associated score after her fall which could in other circumstances influence whether/when potentially life-saving measures for future patients take place. Significantly, the deceased’s confusion at some point after 0500 should have been recorded as 3 under D (“consciousness”) but was never noted at all. It was not clear why; the cardiac nurse practitioner was aware of it and thought the clinical support worker completing the chart had been made aware. Further: first, vomiting after 0500 should have given a nausea score of 2 but was only scored 1; secondly, while a heart rate of 160 after 0500 was noted in the nursing records, only 93 was recorded in the NEWS observation chart at 0515. ”

    Source location

    Pamela Evans · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind nurses to assess, score and accurately record patients’ overall observations, including confusion.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Calculating consciousness in NEWS2 I understand during the live evidence you heard that the NEWS2 algorithm now includes the status of ‘new confusion’ as an additional scoring metric and that while the notes recorded Mrs Evans had a degree of confusion, this was omitted on the scoring sheet leading to an inaccurate calculation.”

    Source location

    2019-0333-Response-by-Bedford-Hospital-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 10 November 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Omitting the confusion score caused no adverse outcome because deterioration was recognised and escalated promptly.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Calculating consciousness in NEWS2 I understand during the live evidence you heard that the NEWS2 algorithm now includes the status of ‘new confusion’ as an additional scoring metric and that while the notes recorded Mrs Evans had a degree of confusion, this was omitted on the scoring sheet leading to an inaccurate calculation.”

    Source location

    2019-0333-Response-by-Bedford-Hospital-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 10 November 2019

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026