Recurring concern
Unreliable CRIS investigation information and review processes
- Reports that mention this concern
- 3
- Times this concern has been raised
- 3
- Stated actions linked to this concern
- 5
What this concern includes
Includes failures in the named CRIS investigation process, including accessing and reviewing relevant CRIS information, accurately recording and communicating incident information, assigning or completing required actions, supervisory review and critical assessment before closure.
What is not included
- Excludes police crime-recording failures not specifically involving the CRIS investigation process.
- Excludes general police investigation, staffing, training or communication deficiencies unless they directly impair CRIS information handling or review.
- Excludes failures in downstream action after a CRIS investigation has been reliably reviewed and closed.
- Excludes the underlying death, offence or incident where no CRIS process deficiency is identified.
Trends
Reports over time
Reports mentioning this concern, over time
Reports about this concern issued each year.
* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.
Most frequent recipients
Most frequent recipients
Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.
Reports and published responses 3 reports
See individual reports that have raised this concern, and the actions taken in response
-
Concerns raised1
Closure of CRIS investigations without completion review and critical assessment of non-suspicious classification
This report raised 8 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked response
- Metropolitan Police Service
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.4
-
Metropolitan Police Service
Introduce tighter governance for unexpected deaths under investigation, including action tracking, local progress oversight and dip sampling.
-
Metropolitan Police Service
Add a DS and DI curriculum lesson on reviewing and signing investigative actions as complete.
-
Metropolitan Police Service
Amend and publish the Death Investigation Policy to require recording post-mortem recommendations, rationale for non-compliance, structured death-investigation definitions, supervisor actions and ADR use.
-
Metropolitan Police Service
Issue CONNECT policy guidance reinforcing supervisors’ responsibilities for reviewing and recording investigative actions as completed.
-
Concerns raised1
Failure to review CRIS information before interview
This report raised 18 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
No linked response statementsNo respondent-stated action or position is linked to these concerns in the published data.
-
Concerns raised1
Failure to accurately record and communicate incident information on the CRIS
This report raised 7 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked response
- Metropolitan Police Service
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.1
-
Metropolitan Police Service
Provide continuously available policing toolkits and a Reception Services Manual with checklists and flowcharts for recording, escalating and investigating threats to life and other relevant risks.
Respondent positions A position is what a respondent says about the concern when they do not describe a specific action.1
-
Metropolitan Police Service
PAO training and business processes are considered sufficient for accurate crime recording and useful initial investigation.
Actions and positions describe what organisations say in published responses. Implementation is not independently verified.
Data last updated 7 September 2026