Recurring concern

Unsafe medication prescribing

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 5 May 2013•Latest report 25 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures involving the clinical appropriateness of prescribing or medication selection, including inadequate assessment of indication, patient circumstances, relevant information, alternatives or dose.

Not included

  • Excludes failures limited to medication administration after an otherwise appropriate prescription.
  • Excludes generic documentation, training or communication deficiencies unless they directly result in or are explicitly tied to an unsafe prescribing decision.
  • Excludes dispensing, supply or monitoring failures that do not concern whether the medication prescription itself was clinically appropriate.
Reports
121

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
151

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
246

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care20
NHS England16
Care Quality Commission7
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board7
General Medical Council6
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence4
Recipient name withheld4
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency3
NHS Surrey and Sussex Integrated Care Board3
Royal College of General Practitioners3
Royal College of Physicians3
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust3
Welsh Government3
BNF Publications2
Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Local Health Board2

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Portsmouth and South East Hampshire

    AI-generated summary

    Courtney Jordan Mills · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Courtney Jordan Mills was found unresponsive in bed at home on 19 April 2013 and was pronounced deceased at hospital that morning. The concerns included repeated prescription and communication problems affecting access to Clonodine, which was reported as a medication that should not be stopped abruptly, and the potential risk to other children in similar circumstances. The inquest recorded acute bronchopneumonia in a child with sleep apnoea and cerebral palsy, with death due to natural causes.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to issue correct Clonodine prescriptions

    Wider context from the report

    “I was told that (quote): "Courtney was on a quantity of different medication for her conditions one of which is "Clonodine". Her parents reported that they had been having problems getting the correct prescriptions for this from the GP surgery (written as tablets instead of solution, wrong dosage etc) and this caused problems. This drug cannot just be stopped as the patient suffers from withdrawal symptoms and has to be weaned off gradually. The drug was ordered in by the Pharmacist and could take 5 days to get in so the prescription was always requested in advance of when it was required. Courtney's supply was running low and a prescription was collected by mother and taken to the pharmacy. She returned a few days later she was told that the prescription had been written wrongly and had been returned to the GP and she should have been called by them. Neither parent had received a call. Mother attended the surgery and was told that the prescription could not be done until they had spoken to Courtney's consultant at SGH, ████████ and they would be called when done. No calls received. Courtney's last dose of this medication was due to be given on Thursday morning and father continued to contact the GP surgery on Wednesday but was told it was not ready, he called again on Thursday to an answering machine stating the practice was closed for a training day. He was due to go into the surgery this morning to discuss the matter with the GPs." I was also told that Clonodine could be obtained from the pharmacy at Queen Alexandra Hospital for patients under the care of a consultant - as was Courtney. There had been a history of delay in her obtaining this medication due to communication difficulties between the hospital and her GP surgery. I believe such a problem could put other children's lives at risk in similar circumstances. ”

    Source location

    Courtney Jordan Mills · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The medication was not prescribed by the Trust, and there was no evidence that the hospital had been approached for a supply.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I understand from ████████ that the Clonidine was not in fact prescribed by Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust and our Pharmacy Department have also confirmed that we have no evidence to suggest that Queen Alexandra Hospital were approached for a supply of the drug, although had we been approached, we would have supplied it. In past situations like these, where community pharmacists have had trouble getting hold of non-routine medicines, the patient’s family have contacted our Children’s Assessment Unit (CAU) who have arranged for it to be prescribed by a doctor here and then we have dispensed it from the QAH pharmacy. This is a situation that we are used to and we would have done this in this case. However, had CAU been asked, they may have had a problem verifying the usual dosage, in which case we would have had to contact Southampton prior to writing the prescription.”

    Source location

    2014-0224-Response-by-Portsmouth-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 May 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing assessment-unit and pharmacy arrangements would have enabled medication supply if the hospital had been approached, so no further Trust steps were proposed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I understand from ████████ that the Clonidine was not in fact prescribed by Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust and our Pharmacy Department have also confirmed that we have no evidence to suggest that Queen Alexandra Hospital were approached for a supply of the drug, although had we been approached, we would have supplied it. In past situations like these, where community pharmacists have had trouble getting hold of non-routine medicines, the patient’s family have contacted our Children’s Assessment Unit (CAU) who have arranged for it to be prescribed by a doctor here and then we have dispensed it from the QAH pharmacy. This is a situation that we are used to and we would have done this in this case. However, had CAU been asked, they may have had a problem verifying the usual dosage, in which case we would have had to contact Southampton prior to writing the prescription.”

    Source location

    2014-0224-Response-by-Portsmouth-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 May 2014

    Open published response
  2. Inner South London

    AI-generated summary

    Lisa Webb · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lisa Webb died suddenly and unexpectedly at home on 10 March 2012, aged 44. The inquest recorded natural causes, including adult respiratory distress syndrome and lower respiratory tract infection, with sleep apnoea and chronic asthma noted. Expert evidence raised concerns about the general practitioner's assessment and management of her asthma and respiratory symptoms, including the prescription of Diazepam.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to avoid prescribing Diazepam for anxiety in sleep apnoea or respiratory distress

    Wider context from the report

    “Expert evidence was heard that: (1) The management of asthma by the general practitioner on 9th March 2012, when she presented post-operatively with fast breathing and anxiety, was sub-optimal and creates potential risks for other patients. a) Enquiries about her asthma and use of inhalers were not made, before a diagnosis was made of anxiety related hyperventilation (which was not in previous medical history) b) Fast breathing was observed and recorded (sic hyperventilating and mild wheeze, but the respiratory rate not recorded, nor was her pulse rate. c) Her peak flow rate was not recorded. There was only one record of its being measured in the years of general practice care and that was in 2008, when she was given a steroid inhaler. d) Pulse oximetry was not used (2) The prescription of Diazepam, although it did no harm in this instance, was poor treatment for anxiety, it should not be prescribed in sleep apnoea; and ideally should be avoided in respiratory distress. The GP said that he would not have given it in an asthmatic unless she had it before (of which there was no record) and that he was unaware of the diagnosis of sleep apnoea (of which diagnosis there was also no medical record). ”

    Source location

    Lisa Webb · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Check patients’ histories, previous consultations, outstanding reviews, long-term conditions and medication during consultations, arrange overdue reviews, request appropriate tests, and record advice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Action: Since Ms Webb’s death I make sure that during consultations I check the past history of significant problems and reviews, checks done and review previous consultations. I also check to see if there are any reviews outstanding and either complete them myself or ask the patient to make an appointment at reception for a review. I also record this advice within the patient’s electronic record.”

    Source location

    2014-0213-Response-by-Basildon-Road-Surgery
    Page 1 · response
    Published 9 May 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Diazepam was prescribed because the known symptoms were not contraindicated; sleep apnoea was undisclosed and would have changed the prescribing decision.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At the time I did not know that Ms Webb had sleep Apnoea. She had never indicated any symptoms to suggest that she had this condition and the symptoms she described on the day were not contraindicated with Diazepam.”

    Source location

    2014-0213-Response-by-Basildon-Road-Surgery
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 May 2014

    Open published response
  3. Inner South London

    AI-generated summary

    Michael Samuel Ian Anthony · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Michael Samuel Ian Anthony was found dead in his flat on 8 May 2013 and died from diabetic ketoacidotic coma. He had a very high Gabapentin level, and concern was raised about whether Gabapentin was contraindicated for someone with severe Type 1 diabetes and whether prescribing doctors knew of its rare potential to precipitate diabetic coma.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to establish whether Gabapentin is contraindicated for patients with severe Type 1 diabetes

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) It was not known whether Gabapentin was contraindicated to be prescribed in the deceased, who suffered severe Type 1 diabetes, or whether the prescribing doctors were aware of the rare side effect of Gabapentin in precipitating diabetic coma. If they were not there would be a potentially avoidable risk to other patients. ”

    Source location

    Michael Samuel Ian Anthony · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Build the drug-safety review into day-to-day clinical practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Many thanks for your letter of 10th April last sent to both myself and ████████████████████████ in relation to the above deceased. We note and acknowledge receipt of the Regulation 28 report to prevent future deaths on the above addressed to myself and ████████████████████████. I have asked for full disclosure by email to the coroner’s office of the toxicologist report. In the meantime, we have asked for a review from the regional drug information service at Guy's. This is attached below and forms part of our reflection, learning and response.”

    Source location

    2014-0161-Response-by-Guys-St-Thomas-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 9 April 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Gabapentin should not be withheld from diabetic patients because it is licensed for painful diabetic neuropathy within specified doses.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. We disagree with the statement that gabapentin should not be used in diabetics as it is a licensed medicine in patients with diabetes to controlled symptoms of painful neuropathy. Licensed doses for this indication can go up to 3600 mg/day.[1,2]”

    Source location

    2014-0161-Response-by-Guys-St-Thomas-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 9 April 2014

    Open published response
  4. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    David Gary Chatburn · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    David Gary Chatburn had a significant history of mental health problems, including depression, probable bipolar disorder, alcohol misuse and fluctuating mood. He was found hanging from a tree on 18 October 2013, and the inquest concluded that he took his own life while the balance of his mind was disturbed. Concerns included the lack of referral to psychiatric services, the GP-led diagnosis and treatment, medication management, informal follow-up, record keeping and barriers in accessing mental health services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to assess medication appropriateness in light of patients’ mental health history

    Wider context from the report

    “2. That the GP did not consider the appropriateness of the medication prescribed, particularly in light of the patient’s past mental health history - preferring to rely upon the presumed, anecdotal preferences of the community psychiatrists. ”

    Source location

    David Gary Chatburn · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Concerns about the GP’s decisions and actions should be addressed by Pennine Care NHS Trust and York House Surgery.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Many of the issues you raise concern the decisions and actions taken by the GP who diagnosed and treated Mr Chatburn. I note that you have sent your report to the Pennine Care NHS Trust and the York House Surgery and I would expect them to properly address these concerns.”

    Source location

    2014-0126-Response-by-Department-of-Health
    Page 3 · response
    Published 18 March 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NHS England’s Performers Screening Group will determine whether specific action is needed regarding the GP’s clinical behaviour.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “My officials have consulted NHS England, as the main commissioner of primary care services, about your report. NHS England has advised that the GP’s clinical behaviour will be discussed at their next Performers Screening Group (PSG). The PSG will then determine if any specific actions need to be taken.”

    Source location

    2014-0126-Response-by-Department-of-Health
    Page 3 · response
    Published 18 March 2014

    Open published response
  5. Carmarthenshire and Pembrokeshire

    AI-generated summary

    Lee Jay Bonsall · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lee Jay Bonsall was found hanging from a bannister rail at his home on 3 March 2012, and the inquest recorded the medical cause of death as asphyxia by hanging, with intent unclear. Concerns related to citalopram being prescribed on repeat and the ten-month waiting time for psychotherapy.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to comply with guidelines on citalopram repeat prescribing

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) That citalopram was given on repeat prescription which is contrary to guidelines. It may well be that awareness of these guidelines needs to be raised to ensure that GPs are aware that citalopram should not be given on ”

    Source location

    Lee Jay Bonsall · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Prescribing responsibility rests with the clinically responsible prescriber, while local primary care organisations must ensure adequate controls.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Responsibility for prescribing, including repeat prescribing, rests with the prescriber who has clinical responsibility for that particular aspect of a patient’s care. This includes considering the suitability of prescribing a particular medicine for a particular patient in light of individual circumstances. In England it is the responsibility of local primary care organisations to ensure that adequate controls are in place. They may therefore issue advice to GPs on repeat prescribing mechanisms.”

    Source location

    2014-0044-Response-by-Department-of-Health-1
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 January 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Further investigation of the cited prescribing guidelines depends on receiving identifying information and confirming that the matter falls within remit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Although your letter mentions guidelines, we cannot therefore establish exactly what you are referring to. I would look into this matter further if you could supply the information and if it falls within my remit.”

    Source location

    2014-0044-Response-by-Department-of-Health-1
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 January 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    National restrictions do not govern repeat citalopram prescribing; NICE guidelines are not mandatory rules restricting clinical prescribing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Thank you also for clarifying the basis for your recommendation on the repeat prescription of citalopram. As I said in my earlier response to you, there are no national restrictions on the repeat prescribing of citalopram in England.”

    Source location

    2014-0044-Response-by-Department-of-Health
    Page 1 · response
    Published 31 January 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Prescribing and managing individual antidepressant cases remain the responsibility of the treating doctor.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “prescribing, of such medicines. NICE’s clinical guidelines represent best practice and are based on the available evidence and developed through wide consultation. Prescribing and the management of individual cases, however, remain the clinical responsibility of the doctor concerned.”

    Source location

    2014-0044-Response-by-Department-of-Health
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 January 2014

    Open published response
  6. Staffordshire South

    AI-generated summary

    Pauline Meredith · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Pauline Meredith, aged 42, was found dead in her flat on 30 August 2013. Her death was attributed to mixed drug toxicity, including a fatal level of morphine, excessive levels of tramadol and propranolol, and alcohol. Concerns included the amount and review of prescribed medication, the addition of morphine alongside existing medication and alcohol dependence, the response to family concerns, the absence of team meetings, and delays in involving community mental health services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to safely assess morphine prescribing alongside high-dose painkillers and alcohol dependence

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The more recent addition of morphine to the prescription for a patient already on a high dose of pain killers and with alcohol dependence ”

    Source location

    Pauline Meredith · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Consider and initiate independent medication reviews by asking an uninvolved doctor to review complex patients’ medication when appropriate.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3) Miss Meredith had seen 3 other doctors and the nurse practitioner in previous 8 months before her death. Having reflected on this case, I recognise that it can often be useful to have another clinician with a fresh pair of eyes looking at patients with chronic problems. The practice will consider whether there are circumstances where the medication reviews are best carried out by another doctor who is not so involved with the case. This would be actioned by the regular doctor asking for a medication review by a colleague who was not involved in management of the case. This is to be initiated from now.”

    Source location

    2014-0011-Response-by-Browning-Street-Surgery
    Page 9 · response
    Published 10 January 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Morphine was considered appropriate because pain was significant, alternatives had failed, alcohol intake had reduced, and prescribing was regularly reviewed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to her request for additional analgesia in February 2013, options were limited. For pain relief, she was already taking tramadol 50mg 2 tablets four times daily (maximum dose) plus paracetamol 500mg 2 tablets four times daily (maximum dose) and diclofenac 50mg three times daily (maximal usual dose). I was reluctant to prescribe co-codamol or codeine or dihydrocodeine. These had previously been prescribed with little effect on her pain. She was already on a strong anti-inflammatory painkiller (diclofenac) and so there was little value in changing to an alternative anti-inflammatory. As Miss Meredith’s pain appeared significant, I decided to prescribe MST (slow release morphine sulphate tablets) 1 tablet twice daily at the lowest dose possible, 10mg. The treatment plan initially was to prescribe this for one week and then review whilst she regained control of her pain.”

    Source location

    2014-0011-Response-by-Browning-Street-Surgery
    Page 3 · response
    Published 10 January 2014

    Open published response
  7. Manchester City

    AI-generated summary

    STEPHANIE DANIELS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Stephanie Daniels, who had a history of serious mental health problems and repeated self-harm, was admitted to the Safire unit on 22 March 2012 after a delay in securing an inpatient bed. She died there on 24 March 2012 after being found unconscious with a ligature around her neck. The principal concerns included inadequate observation and handover, failure to clerk her in, medication-recording and supervision problems, failures in the emergency response, and deficiencies in the subsequent internal investigation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of junior medical staff to review clinical records and history before prescribing medication

    Wider context from the report

    “6. Prescribing of Medication by Junior Medical Staff I am concerned by the circumstances in this case where medication came to be prescribed. There is an overlap of my concerns about supervision and my observations at paragraph 5 above should be regarded as repeated here. Both junior doctors had no recollection of attending the ward, speaking to the staff or seeing the patient. They simply prescribed the medication. They had no recollection of reviewing the deceased’s records and understood that was essential when considering prescribing any medication, and in particular PRN rapid tranquillisation. In this case, the patient was already taking a number of drugs which had sedative effects. Two further medications were introduced that have similar properties and that also could potentially affect heart function. ”

    Source location

    STEPHANIE DANIELS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 10 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inform trainees about the Rapid Tranquillisation protocol through induction and clarify consultants’ supervision responsibilities for junior-doctor prescribing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “████████ Interim Medical Director, will ensure that all trainees will be informed about the Rapid Tranquillisation protocol through the induction process. In addition, consultants will be made aware of their responsibilities in respect of supervision of junior doctors prescribing. The Trust has amended the prescription card to ensure that Rapid Tranquillisation is clearly identifiable and not confused with PRN (as necessary) medication. The Trust incident reporting system is being adapted to record whether Rapid Tranquillisation was administered intramuscularly or orally and whether physical / safe observations were maintained in line with Trust policy. This is monitored through induction attendance records, pharmacy daily monitoring of prescriptions and Datix incident reporting.”

    Source location

    2013-0353-Response-by-Manchester-Mental-Health-NHS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 December 2013

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Trust-level policy and procedural concerns are assigned to the NTDA and Manchester Health and Social Care Trust.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As many of the concerns you raise are issues to be dealt with at Trust level, I have ensured that your concerns have been sent to the National Trust Development Authority (NTDA) which provides support, oversight and governance for all NHS Trusts. The NTDA is in contact with MHSCT Trust and has received an action plan which seeks to address the points you have raised.”

    Source location

    2013-0353-Response-by-Department-of-Health
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 December 2013

    Open published response
  8. Cheshire

    AI-generated summary

    Carol Ann Gibson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Carol Ann Gibson, aged 65, died at home on 8 August 2012 following an adverse reaction to nitrofurantoin, which had been prescribed despite an alert in her medical records about a previous adverse reaction. The concerns included failure to heed and appropriately investigate the alert, and possible weaknesses in the practice’s systems and staff understanding for managing patient safety alerts.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to check adverse-reaction alerts before prescribing

    Wider context from the report

    “1. ████████ ignored a warning alert in the medical records that his patient had suffered an adverse reaction to nitrofurantoin without checking the nature of the adverse reaction and issued a prescription for the drug regardless. 2. A letter dated 3rd November 2008 was sent by a consultant to ████████ at Castlefields Health Centre identifying that the interstitial lung disease from which 3. ████████ on commenting on alert warnings, said that most are “trivial, spurious, irrelevant or just wrong”, identified a phenomenon that he described as alert fatigue and further stated that colleagues within the practice had admitted that they “may well have done the same in my situation”. I am concerned that if ████████ comments correctly describe the attitude within his medical practice to patient safety alerts this is a matter of considerable concern and warrants investigation by you to ensure first of all that the practice has a robust system in place for posting such alerts, secondly that such alerts when posted, correctly and sufficiently identify the problem and thirdly that doctors and medical staff within the practice have full understanding and training to respond to such alerts in an appropriate manner. ”

    Source location

    Carol Ann Gibson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. London Eastern

    AI-generated summary

    Tripta Rani KUMAR · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Tripta Rani KUMAR underwent planned hysterectomy and was discharged, but was readmitted the following day with abdominal pain and a perforated bowel. She developed sepsis, suffered a cardiac arrest on 25 August 2012, and died despite CPR. A principal concern was that penicillin-containing Tazocin was prescribed despite records and a wristband indicating a penicillin allergy, after an unsigned handwritten alteration changed the record to “nil allergies”.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to prevent prescribing penicillin-type antibiotics to patients with penicillin allergy

    Wider context from the report

    “In the emergency department, during the course of treatment given on the 24th August 2012, the deceased was attended to by an ST4, doctor in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. The doctor documented the likely diagnosis, requested an urgent CT scan and prescribed intravenous antibiotics in the form of Tazocin. Tazocin contains two active ingredients, Piperacillin, which is a penicillin type antibiotic and Tazobactum which is a medicine that prevents bacteria from inactivating Piperacillin. Evidence from the family of the deceased, confirmed by ████████ (Consultant in Accident and Emergency), revealed that the notes clearly showed that the patient had a penicillin allergy. The family of the deceased also confirmed in court that their mother was wearing a band on her wrist which confirmed the penicillin allergy. ████████ further confirmed that the entry in the notes that said ‘penicillin allergy’ had been crossed out and the note ‘nil allergies’ had been entered instead. This was in handwriting but with no signature to confirm who had written the note. The grave danger is that, although not relevant in this particular case, giving someone penicillin who was allergic to that penicillin could easily have resulted in an anaphylactic shock which, in turn, could have resulted in death. ”

    Source location

    Tripta Rani KUMAR · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. West Yorkshire (East)

    AI-generated summary

    JILL FELICITY SINSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jill Felicity Sinson had schizophrenia, an anxiety-related disorder, non-epileptic seizures, and a history of self-harm and suicidal tendencies. She was last seen alive on 3 September 2012 and was found lifeless at her home on 10 September 2012; life was pronounced extinct by paramedics. The concerns included inadequate GP monitoring, failure to review or refer her after a GP surgery consultation, insufficient consideration of her medical history when prescribing medication unsupervised, and failure to act appropriately on correspondence from her Consultant Psychiatrist.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to account for self-harm and suicidal tendencies when supplying unsupervised medication

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) The Deceased was prescribed a significant quantity of medication on a monthly basis, such medication being given in possession and unsupervised, without due consideration for the Deceased’s medical history of self-harm and suicidal tendencies, which history was recorded on the Deceased’s computerised medical records. ”

    Source location

    JILL FELICITY SINSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026