Recurring concern

Unsafe medication prescribing

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 5 May 2013•Latest report 25 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures involving the clinical appropriateness of prescribing or medication selection, including inadequate assessment of indication, patient circumstances, relevant information, alternatives or dose.

Not included

  • Excludes failures limited to medication administration after an otherwise appropriate prescription.
  • Excludes generic documentation, training or communication deficiencies unless they directly result in or are explicitly tied to an unsafe prescribing decision.
  • Excludes dispensing, supply or monitoring failures that do not concern whether the medication prescription itself was clinically appropriate.
Reports
121

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
151

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
246

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care20
NHS England16
Care Quality Commission7
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board7
General Medical Council6
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence4
Recipient name withheld4
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency3
NHS Surrey and Sussex Integrated Care Board3
Royal College of General Practitioners3
Royal College of Physicians3
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust3
Welsh Government3
BNF Publications2
Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Local Health Board2

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Wiltshire and Swindon

    AI-generated summary

    Adam Connolly Stuyvesant · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Adam Connolly Stuyvesant was involved in a minor road traffic collision on 17 August 2022 and sustained an ankle injury that was immobilised with a plastic boot. He collapsed on 22 August 2022 and died despite resuscitation efforts; the post-mortem confirmed pulmonary embolus arising from deep vein thrombosis associated with lower-limb immobilisation. The report raised concerns that the hospital’s DVT risk assessment did not account for immobilisation when considering anti-clotting medication.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    DVT risk assessment failing to account for immobilisation when determining anti-clotting medication prescribing

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The wearing of a plastic boot can lead to lower limb immobility and the possibility of a restriction in the “calf pump function” which can lead to deep vein thrombosis. (2) The DVT risk assessment in use in the Emergency Department at The Great Western Hospital, made no provision to take account of the immobilisation when considering whether anti-clotting medication should be prescribed. (3) That without taking account of the immobility, as part of the DVT risk assessment, further patients may not be prescribed anti-clotting medication and as a result develop DVT, resulting in death from pulmonary embolus. ”

    Source location

    Adam Connolly Stuyvesant · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the Trust policy to require VTE assessment for patients wearing a black boot with significant mobility reduction.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has reviewed the assessment again following the regulation 28 and are confident that the current VTE risk assessment is fit for purpose. As part of the review our local VTE risk assessment was compared to the Plymouth Scoring system, a nationally recognised standard, to assess whether the appropriate treatment is being given to patients and we confirm it is in line with this standard. To guide staff, the Trust's policy was reviewed and updated to indicate that patients who receive a black boot to assist with mobility but have significant reductions in their mobility will require a VTE assessment.”

    Source location

    Response from Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 October 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Relocate patient information leaflets and VTE assessment checklists to the black-boot storage area and remind Emergency Department staff to complete assessments for lower-limb casts or black boots.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There has been an increased focus on the patient information leaflets and the VTE risk assessment checklist in the department for patients with a black boot and these have since been relocated to the area where the black boots are stored. This is to emphasise the importance of completing the correct documentation for VTE risk assessments for patient requiring a black boot. There has also been a MEMO reminder sent to all Emergency Department staff reminding them that they need to complete risk assessments for any patients who are wearing lower limb casts or black boot.”

    Source location

    Response from Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 October 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue spot-check audits of the changes, share results at Divisional Governance meetings, and take appropriate action where required.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We will continue to monitor the effectiveness of the changes by way of spot check audits within the department, these results will be shared at Divisional Governance meetings and appropriate actions taken as required.”

    Source location

    Response from Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 October 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The current VTE risk assessment is fit for purpose and aligns with the nationally recognised Plymouth Scoring system.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has reviewed the assessment again following the regulation 28 and are confident that the current VTE risk assessment is fit for purpose. As part of the review our local VTE risk assessment was compared to the Plymouth Scoring system, a nationally recognised standard, to assess whether the appropriate treatment is being given to patients and we confirm it is in line with this standard. To guide staff, the Trust's policy was reviewed and updated to indicate that patients who receive a black boot to assist with mobility but have significant reductions in their mobility will require a VTE assessment.”

    Source location

    Response from Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 October 2023

    Open published response
  2. Norfolk

    AI-generated summary

    Colin Vincent GREENWAY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Colin Vincent Greenway became ill with gastroenteritis after returning from Cyprus and was admitted to hospital with acute kidney injury and infection. He was prescribed enoxaparin at half the usual dose despite documented risk factors and renal function above the threshold for dose reduction, and he later died from a pulmonary embolism. The concerns included incorrect junior prescribing, incomplete VTE assessments, inadequate senior oversight and continuity of care, and limited pharmacy checking.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of junior doctors to prescribe correctly in accordance with guidelines

    Wider context from the report

    “Junior doctors incorrect prescribing despite clear guidelines. ”

    Source location

    Colin Vincent GREENWAY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and seek approval for revised local VTE guidelines.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our local Guidelines relating to VTE are under review, and this is due to be taken to the next Drug and Therapeutics Committee Meeting for ratification on 31 October 2023, before being referred on to our Clinical Effectiveness Executive Group for final approval. In the meantime, these local guidelines have been removed from the Trust’s intranet and replaced with a link to the appropriate NICE guidance for VTE Adults.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remove local VTE guidelines from the intranet and link to NICE guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our local Guidelines relating to VTE are under review, and this is due to be taken to the next Drug and Therapeutics Committee Meeting for ratification on 31 October 2023, before being referred on to our Clinical Effectiveness Executive Group for final approval. In the meantime, these local guidelines have been removed from the Trust’s intranet and replaced with a link to the appropriate NICE guidance for VTE Adults.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Consult ICS acute Trusts and the Integrated Care Board about standardising thromboprophylaxis regulation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We recognise the importance of standardising the prescription of thromboprophylaxis across our Integrated Care Service, particularly because junior doctors regularly complete training placements in more than one Trust across the group. We are therefore consulting with our colleagues at the other acute Trusts within the Norfolk and Waveney Integrated Care System (ICS) and also with our Integrated Care Board to see how we can better regulate this.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reiterate accurate VTE assessment and thromboprophylaxis prescribing requirements through Trust-wide communications.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have reiterated the importance of accurate VTE risk assessment and thromboprophylaxis prescription (medication to prevent clot formation) via Trust-wide communications. We are also reviewing our induction materials to ensure these issues are given appropriate emphasis. VTE is part of our mandatory training, and our Anticoagulation team have produced a booklet which has been distributed to our junior doctors. We are looking into making this available via a QR Code, to improve accessibility.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review induction materials to strengthen emphasis on VTE assessment and thromboprophylaxis prescribing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have reiterated the importance of accurate VTE risk assessment and thromboprophylaxis prescription (medication to prevent clot formation) via Trust-wide communications. We are also reviewing our induction materials to ensure these issues are given appropriate emphasis. VTE is part of our mandatory training, and our Anticoagulation team have produced a booklet which has been distributed to our junior doctors. We are looking into making this available via a QR Code, to improve accessibility.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Distribute an anticoagulation booklet to junior doctors.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have reiterated the importance of accurate VTE risk assessment and thromboprophylaxis prescription (medication to prevent clot formation) via Trust-wide communications. We are also reviewing our induction materials to ensure these issues are given appropriate emphasis. VTE is part of our mandatory training, and our Anticoagulation team have produced a booklet which has been distributed to our junior doctors. We are looking into making this available via a QR Code, to improve accessibility.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add a consultant check box for confirming VTE assessment completion and dosage checking when Clerking Documents are next revised and reprinted.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In consequence, we are removing the VTE risk assessment within the Clerking Documents, so that this must be completed on ePMA only. Following feedback from our clinicians, we have made the decision to retain the guidance on VTE risk factors and contraindications within the Clerking Documents. This is because our clinicians advised that they found this very helpful as a reference, and it includes more examples than the guidance on the ePMA risk assessments and is based on the Department of Health advice. When our Clerking Documents are revised and reprinted next, they will contain a check box for the Consultant to confirm that the VTE risk assessment has been completed, and the dosage checked.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response
  3. Mid Kent and Medway

    AI-generated summary

    Sally-Ann Few · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sally-Ann Few was found dead at home on 12 March 2022, after being discharged from hospital the previous day with both slow-release and faster-acting morphine; a post-mortem found that she died as a consequence of morphine toxicity. Concerns included the GP prescribing system not showing that Oromorph had been stopped, a discrepancy between inpatient morphine prescriptions that was not reviewed, and poor medical record keeping that did not document decision-making, discussions, or advice.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to prescribe the patient's established Zoromorph medication

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Evidence was heard that Mrs. Few whilst an inpatient was prescribed Oromorph and not Zoromorph the drug she had been using at 20mg twice a day. The effect of which may have impacted upon her pain control but the evidence did not show she had high pain scores. A pharmacist recognised this discrepancy on 8th March and asked for this to be reviewed. No such review took place and it was difficult to see on the electronic records system that such a review needed to take place as apparently there were no highlights or flags to alert the doctors that such a review needed to take place. ”

    Source location

    Sally-Ann Few · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Investigate how primary-care morphine changes were recorded, communicated and reflected in the Kent Summary of Care Record.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust Pharmacy team has contacted representatives of the Kent & Medway ICB Medicines Optimisation team that cover Medway & Swale. They are currently investigating the review process by the pharmacist to understand how the dose and product changes made were recorded and communicated to the GP practice. They are also investigating why these changes did not appear in the Kent Summary of Care Record.”

    Source location

    Response from Medway NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 November 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind pharmacy staff to follow medicines recommendations through to a conscious decision to endorse or reject them.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the interim, Pharmacy staff have been reminded that their professional responsibility does not end with a note flagging a potential medicines issue, but there is an expectation that recommendations should be followed through to a conscious decision to either endorse or reject a recommendation.”

    Source location

    Response from Medway NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 21 November 2022

    Open published response
  4. Stoke-on-Trent and North Staffordshire

    AI-generated summary

    Eirwen Rebecca Hollister · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Eirwen Rebecca Hollister, who had a history of mental health issues and overdoses of prescribed medication, was found deceased at home on 10 May 2022. Evidence at the inquest identified that prescriptions continued after overdoses, and that there was no process to prevent further prescriptions before a full review.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a process to prevent prescriptions being issued before full GPO review following a prescribed-medication overdose

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Evidence was given during the inquest that there was no process or procedure in place to ensure that when a patient, registered with the GP practice, took an overdose of prescribed medication, no prescriptions were issued before a full review by a GPO was undertaken. . ”

    Source location

    Eirwen Rebecca Hollister · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete a significant event analysis and discuss its findings with all clinicians.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• We have carried out a significant event analysis to identify any failings and learning points. The results of the significant analysis were discussed with all clinicians in a meeting on 21/10/22. Please find attached a copy of the significant event analysis.”

    Source location

    Response from Heathview Medical Practice
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 October 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the overdose policy, discuss it with clinicians, and make it accessible to staff on the shared drive.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The ‘Overdose Policy’ has been reviewed and discussed with all clinicians at Heathview Medical Practice on 21/10/22. The Policy is on the shared drive and can be accessed by all staff. Please find attached a copy of the Policy.”

    Source location

    Response from Heathview Medical Practice
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 October 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Teach clinical staff how to action hospital letters concerning overdoses.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Teaching has been carried out to all clinical staff on how to action Docman letters (Clinical letters from Hospital) which involve overdoses on 21/10/2022”

    Source location

    Response from Heathview Medical Practice
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 October 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss the overdose policy and significant event analysis with all practice staff at the scheduled 15 November meeting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The Policy and the significant event will be discussed with all the staff in a practice meeting on 15th November 2022”

    Source location

    Response from Heathview Medical Practice
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 October 2022

    Open published response
  5. Lincolnshire

    AI-generated summary

    Michael James Robert ROLFE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Michael James Robert ROLFE, a 72-year-old man, was admitted on 23 August 2019 with decreasing consciousness and a cerebellar haemorrhage with intraventricular extension, and died the following day after treatment was considered not possible. The report raises concern that prescribing Rivaroxaban in the context of liver impairment, low platelets and impaired renal function may have increased bleeding risk and may have contributed to the rectal bleeding and cerebral haemorrhage.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Prescribing Rivaroxaban despite liver impairment

    Wider context from the report

    “With reference to cause of death at 1b. The deceased had liver impairment due to cirrhosis. He was prescribed the anticoagulant Rivaroxaban for presumed deep vein thrombosis. Within 48 hours he developed rectal bleeding. During his admission to hospital his INR was 1.8 indicating blood was thin. Renal function impaired with a GFR of 39 - baseline 46. Rivaroxaban is contradicted in liver impairment, low platelets and severe renal impairment .(Documented in the product literature and British National Formulary). Consequently, it is represented that the deceased should not have been prescribed Rivaroxaban due to the bleeding risk. Administration of Rivaroxaban to someone with impaired clotting and low platelets would exaggerate the anticoagulant effect and be responsible for the rectal bleed and cerebral haemorrhage that resulted. If accepted the potential inappropriate administration may have led to the cause of death and this has important safety implications that are in the public interest. An action plan to prevent future deaths may be needed. ”

    Source location

    Michael James Robert ROLFE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. Dorset

    AI-generated summary

    Mathew Christopher Moore · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mathew Christopher Moore died on 7 August 2021 in Bournemouth, Dorset, having attached a rope as a ligature. The report records concerns about the combined use of prescribed medication and excess alcohol, including potentially unsafe prescribing, a lack of documented communication of concerns to Mr Moore, and the need for clearer policies, dosage review, follow-up, and information-sharing within the surgery.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to define safe medication amounts and dosages in these circumstances

    Wider context from the report

    “2. I have concerns with regard to the following: i. There could be the death of a person in the future due to combined use of ████████ and excess alcohol and I request that consideration is given to creating a policy at the surgery to cover patients who are prescribed ████████, at the same time as consuming alcohol to excess. ii. I would request consideration is given as to the advice to be given in the circumstances where a patient is not being seen face to face, but via another healthcare worker. iii. Further, consideration should be given to the amount and dosage that should be prescribed in these circumstances and whether there should be a documented process to highlight any concerns about the use of ████████ being brought to the patient’s attention as soon as possible. iv. I would request consideration is given that within the policy there is provision for a follow up face to face meeting to review the medication. v. I would request consideration is given to the policy being available to all healthcare staff in the surgery. ”

    Source location

    Mathew Christopher Moore · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss prescribing quantities and patient disengagement at a Significant Event Meeting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As you will be aware, this incident has been discussed at a Significant Event Meeting at the Practice, where the GPs considered the amount of ████████ prescribed in such cases and also the difficulty where patients fail to engage with GP and Mental Health services.”

    Source location

    Response from Swanage Medical Practice
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create an electronic-record alert for drugs in the specified prescribing group, warning prescribers about dosage and alcohol-related risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to Mr Nicholls concerns and suggestions of the 9th August, I can also confirm that we have now created a protocol alert that triggers on the patient electronic record when any drugs in the ████████ prescribing group are issued. This alert warns the prescriber to consider the amount and dosage being prescribed, and highlights the risk of the use of the drug combined with excess alcohol use. The alert also asks them to consider arranging a face to face medication review with the patient. This alert is available to all staff at the Practice who issue medications in the ████████ prescribing group.”

    Source location

    Response from Swanage Medical Practice
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 September 2022

    Open published response
  7. Inner South London

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Locksley Burton · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Locksley Burton, an 80-year-old disabled right leg amputee with dementia and other conditions, died in hospital on 24 April 2020 from mixed natural causes including systemic sepsis, Covid-19 pneumonia and osteomyelitis of the left heel. Concerns included inadequate wound inspections and dressing changes after diabetic foot clinic attendance was reduced, insufficient communication and care planning, and no demonstrated process for managing refusal of potentially life-threatening care where capacity was probably lacking.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Prescribing antibiotics without examining the patient

    Wider context from the report

    “Mr Burton did not receive adequate inspections of his wound and changes of dressings when the attendance at the diabetic foot clinic ceased to be weekly or fortnightly. The pandemic was a likely reason for this, but there might be other reasons in future for such changes. There was no evidence at inquest that alternative arrangements and revised care plan was made. The GP did not know of the reduction in clinic attendance or reduction in changes of dressing and assumed others were inspecting the wound and prescribed antibiotics without an examination being done. No witness was able to demonstrate any process of managing a patient who declined necessary potentially life threatening care and probably lacked capacity to make the decision. ”

    Source location

    Mr Locksley Burton · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Michael John Vince · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Michael John Vince, a patient of the community mental health team receiving treatment for schizo-affective disorder, was found deceased at home on 19 June 2021 after apparently taking an overdose. The concerns included prolonged prescribing of medication for insomnia, lack of meaningful prescription review, failure to share evidence of dependence, and failure to monitor the frequency of PRN administration.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to limit prolonged prescribing of insomnia medication

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The NICE guidelines for ████████ indicate that it is a suitable medication for the short term treatment of insomnia, it advises against prolonged use due to risk of tolerance and withdrawal symptoms. Mr Vince is said to have been prescribed ████████ for 20 years. ”

    Source location

    Michael John Vince · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit and clinically review all patients prescribed Zopiclone over the previous two years, including structured reviews and a second-cycle review of repeat prescriptions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A. Clinical Audit of all patients prescribed Zopiclone over the past 2 years:”

    Source location

    Response from High St Surgery
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a local Z-Drug protocol requiring structured medication reviews at defined intervals and after relevant mental-health review.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “B. Implementation of Z-Drug Protocol”

    Source location

    Response from High St Surgery
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold practice staff meetings to explain the Z-Drug protocol and require repeat-prescription requests to be referred for medication review.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “C. Discussion and Education of Practice Staff”

    Source location

    Response from High St Surgery
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Commence more proactive referral of patients appearing dependent on Z-Drug hypnotics to specialist mental-health services for review and advice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “For my part, I have commenced more proactive referral of patients who appear dependent upon Z-Drug hypnotics for review and advice by specialist NELFT Mental Health services. This has been assisted by the response of the NELFT to the Coronal recommendations and the discussion and collaboration that has resulted. My practice’s Z-Drug Protocol includes a requirement for structured medication review for patients on long term Z-Drugs with mental health issues, and a requirement to notify the Mental Health Team for those patients who request additional Z drugs.”

    Source location

    Response from High St Surgery
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust, through its pharmacy services, is responsible for the wider Z-drug prescribing audit and safe-prescribing training package.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust committed to undertaking a wider audit of Z-Drug prescribing within the NELFT localities which will be led by the Trust pharmacy services. They will also be developing a safe-prescribing training package and will include education of local GP’s in their roll-out of this package.”

    Source location

    Response from High St Surgery
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 September 2022

    Open published response
  9. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Matthew John Evans · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Matthew John Evans was a 47-year-old man who developed insomnia, anxiety and depression during the third COVID-19 lockdown and died on 16 June 2021 after ending his life. The principal concerns related to the GP’s lack of mental-health assessment, suicide-risk assessment, follow-up and consideration of referral; the general practice’s prescribing, communication and clinical-governance arrangements; and TalkPlus’s lack of clear guidance on referral to secondary mental-health services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Prescribing of Mirtazepine without sufficient mental health prescribing competence

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The actions of the General Practitioner The GP was not sufficiently proactive with multiple lost opportunities to provide better care and support for Matthew. The GP did not undertake a mental health assessment to assess the severity of Matthew’s difficulties and to ascertain whether further support or referral to secondary mental health care were indicated in any of the four telephone consultations. He did not ask or document at any time if Matthew had any suicidal ideation or acts of self-harm. The GP did not offer a face-to-face consultation or arrange a follow up appointment. The GP declined to prescribe Zopiclone and whilst he referred Matthew to the benefits of Melatonin he did not offer a prescription. He prescribed Mirtazepine having not done so before for someone in Matthew’s position on a background of having no post graduate qualifications in mental health. Furthermore, he did not document any warning of the possible side-effects of this drug including the possible increased risk of suicidal ideation with commencing the drug. It is unclear whether the GP had read the letters from TalkPlus. He did not ask permission as to whether it was possible to inform or involve Matthew’s partner and family in his on-going care. ”

    Source location

    Matthew John Evans · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Circulate NICE prescribing, treatment and patient-information guidance, CCG guidance, and Frimley ICS medicines-optimisation guidance to all clinicians.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “36. The Practice repeats and relies upon the response at paragraph 30 above.”

    Source location

    Response from Farnham Practice
    Page 4 · response
    Published 19 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit patient use of the specified medication, present the results, and identify any required patient-safety actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “38. The Practice will conduct an Audit of patient ████████ use by August 2022. To present audit results and identify if there is/are action/s required in relation to patient safety i.e. patient education regarding the use of the drug, follow-up to check patient remained safe in taking this drug, and does or has the patient required secondary referral to be supported by the community mental health team.”

    Source location

    Response from Farnham Practice
    Page 5 · response
    Published 19 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing NICE, Clinical Knowledge Summaries, BNF, GP training and continuing professional development sufficiently support depression assessment and prescribing without a separate policy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “a) No policy was provided to assist GP’s with prescribing of Mirtazapine and antidepressants and anxiolytics in general practice”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 4 · response
    Published 19 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The circumstances were a specific case, not widespread poor care, and the care provided was not unsafe.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are satisfied, at this point, that the circumstances surrounding Mr Evans’ death were a specific case and not indicative of widespread poor care on the part of the provider. Whilst we have concluded that improvements could have been made in the care and treatment provided to Mr Evans, this was not unsafe. We are pleased to see the provider has identified areas of improvement in its care and treatment, and we are assured that the actions taken will protect others using the service from harm. At this stage we have decided not to instigate any further action. However, we will continue to regularly monitor the provider and, where”

    Source location

    Response from Care Quality Commisson
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    No further action is currently considered necessary because the provider’s actions are expected to protect service users from harm.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are satisfied, at this point, that the circumstances surrounding Mr Evans’ death were a specific case and not indicative of widespread poor care on the part of the provider. Whilst we have concluded that improvements could have been made in the care and treatment provided to Mr Evans, this was not unsafe. We are pleased to see the provider has identified areas of improvement in its care and treatment, and we are assured that the actions taken will protect others using the service from harm. At this stage we have decided not to instigate any further action. However, we will continue to regularly monitor the provider and, where”

    Source location

    Response from Care Quality Commisson
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Regulatory action can target registered managers or providers, but not failings attributed solely to individuals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As you may be aware, CQC can only take regulatory action against a registered manager or a registered provider, but not when failings of an individual have been identified.”

    Source location

    Response from Care Quality Commisson
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing clinical guidance, professional standards, revalidation and training arrangements are considered sufficient to support appropriate prescribing and diagnosis.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As noted by NHS England, there are several educational resources and guidance documents relating to the assessment and treatment of depression that are regularly reviewed and accessible to clinicians. These include National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance, which details possible adverse effects of prescribing mirtazapine, Clinical Knowledge Summaries and the British National Formulary.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The concerns do not indicate that the doctor poses a patient risk or undermines public confidence in doctors.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The AR is assured that the matters contained in your complaint do not raise concerns that ████████ poses either a risk to patients or undermines the public’s confidence in doctors. Although we do not need to investigate further, we will share your concerns with the doctor’s responsible officer and ask the doctor to discuss it with their appraiser as part of their revalidation.”

    Source location

    Response from General Medical Council(2)
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    No further investigation is considered necessary, although the concerns will be shared for discussion during revalidation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The AR is assured that the matters contained in your complaint do not raise concerns that ████████ poses either a risk to patients or undermines the public’s confidence in doctors. Although we do not need to investigate further, we will share your concerns with the doctor’s responsible officer and ask the doctor to discuss it with their appraiser as part of their revalidation.”

    Source location

    Response from General Medical Council(2)
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Practice concluded that the prescribed medication was appropriate because insomnia was the patient's original primary reason for contacting it.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “28. ████████ has prescribed ████████ before. He was asked by H.M. Coroner whether he had ever prescribed ████████ to a middle-aged man experiencing mental health issues for the first time before. ████████ confirmed this was the first time he had initiated the prescription of this medication to someone not in a care home (i.e., not elderly).”

    Source location

    Response from Farnham Practice
    Page 4 · response
    Published 19 May 2022

    Open published response
  10. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Alphonso Alexander Shearer · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Alphonso Alexander Shearer, who had oesophageal cancer and poor swallowing, was discharged with a catheter after treatment for acute urinary retention. He developed symptoms consistent with a urinary tract infection, was prescribed antibiotics he could not swallow, and later collapsed and died while being transferred to an ambulance; post-mortem examination confirmed urosepsis. Concerns included the lack of a system to identify the need for liquid antibiotics, difficulties with the ASK MY GP communication system, and the absence of a face-to-face GP assessment before his deterioration was recognised.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to recognise and flag the most appropriate antibiotic formulation for vulnerable patients

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The inquest heard that Mr Shearer was frail and vulnerable with very poor swallow. When prescribing the clinicians did not recognise or have a system to flag up the need for liquid antibiotics rather than tablet antibiotics. This led to him not being able to commence antibiotics on the day he was identified as needing them. The inquest heard that it is important that in the community particularly for the vulnerable there is a system for recognising what form of antibiotics are most appropriate to prescribe for avoid delay. ”

    Source location

    Alphonso Alexander Shearer · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use quarterly educational events to disseminate system changes and learning from safety events to Trafford practice staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The practice Medicines Management Team are also supporting this work to help avoid any unnecessary delays in a patient’s medication. As a CCG we offer support with EMISWeb system to develop system alerts as well as other system capabilities and all our practices have had the training to be able to manage this system on a day to day basis. Whilst we are not responsible for the monitoring of the operational systems of our practices, we use our quarterly educational events which practice staff attend to share any changes to the system and share learning from events such as this. We are really pleased that the practice is undertaking this exercise to ensure that patients with specific needs are managed appropriately.”

    Source location

    Response from Tafford Clinical Commissioning Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement patient-record alerts identifying patients who may have difficulty swallowing medication.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Practice has now adopted the policy of adding alerts to all patients who could have difficulty swallowing medication.”

    Source location

    Response from North Trafford Group Practice
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disseminate the swallowing-medication alert learning to practice staff and discuss the process at the next clinical meeting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to the above system changes, we have also discussed this matter as a learning event within the senior team at the practice, and will be disseminating the learning from this. We will also have a further discussion in our next clinical meeting so that the clinical staff are aware of the new flagging process and how to enter the clinical codes and alerts in the EMISWeb system.”

    Source location

    Response from North Trafford Group Practice
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train workflow staff to enter swallowing-related codes and alerts when hospital correspondence identifies changes in a patient’s swallowing ability.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “When a hospital letter comes through indicating any changes in the patient’s ability to swallow, our workflow team will be trained to enter the codes and alerts as appropriate. Our medicines management team will be conducting searches on a monthly basis to ensure the appropriate alerts are in place. We will review this process after the first 3 months.”

    Source location

    Response from North Trafford Group Practice
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reiterate standardised medication-requirement recording and safety-netting requirements in prescribing protocols, particularly when patients are not seen face-to-face.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To share the learning from this case we will also reiterate the importance of standardised and consistent recording of medication requirements on the patient record, and ensuring that protocols for prescribing, particularly when the patient has not been seen face-to-face by the practice, include a safety netting element.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Greater Manchester
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitoring how GP practices operate their systems is outside the CCG’s responsibility.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The practice Medicines Management Team are also supporting this work to help avoid any unnecessary delays in a patient’s medication. As a CCG we offer support with EMISWeb system to develop system alerts as well as other system capabilities and all our practices have had the training to be able to manage this system on a day to day basis. Whilst we are not responsible for the monitoring of the operational systems of our practices, we use our quarterly educational events which practice staff attend to share any changes to the system and share learning from events such as this. We are really pleased that the practice is undertaking this exercise to ensure that patients with specific needs are managed appropriately.”

    Source location

    Response from Tafford Clinical Commissioning Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 April 2022

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026