Recurring concern

Failure to ensure timely transfer to an appropriate hospital care environment

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 23 Sep 2013•Latest report 24 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of the hospital transfer, bed-allocation or placement process that delay or prevent timely movement from an inappropriate setting to an available and clinically appropriate ward or alternative care environment.

Not included

  • Excludes failures concerning only the quality or suitability of a care environment when no delayed or inappropriate transfer or placement process is identified.
  • Excludes generic staffing, resource or bed-capacity deficiencies unless they are directly tied to delayed or failed transfer or placement in an appropriate care environment.
  • Excludes unrelated admission, discharge, clinical-treatment or risk-assessment failures that do not concern transfer or placement in the appropriate hospital setting.
Reports
24

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
24

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
67

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care10
NHS England4
Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership3
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB2
Care Quality Commission2
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust2
Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust2
Aneurin Bevan University LHB1
Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust1
Chief Executive of National Institution for Health and Care Excellence1
Chief Executive of Royal College of Midwives1
Chief Executive of Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists1
Consultant orthopaedic surgeon1
Conwy County Borough Council1
Denbighshire County Council1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Gwent

    AI-generated summary

    Nola-Reign Morgan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Nola-Reign Morgan was born prematurely on 5 February 2024 after her mother developed suspected chorioamnionitis, and died three days later despite resuscitation and neonatal care. The report identified delays in transferring her mother to the labour ward and high dependency unit, a period without fetal monitoring, and gaps in national and local guidance and staff training on monitoring and managing suspected chorioamnionitis in pre-term pregnancies.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to identify causes of transfer delays and take steps to avoid unnecessary delay recurring

    Wider context from the report

    “1. National Guidance. There is no national guidance in the antenatal setting to establish when and in what circumstances fetal monitoring should be used especially when chorioamnionitis is suspected. Further there is no specific guidance that has been brought to my attention to identify and treat chorioamnionitis in pre-term mothers. Clear guidance exists for intrapartum fetal monitoring but in this case the grey area between Nola-Reign's mother being nearly but not in active labour meant that there was confusion as to whether continuous monitoring should or could have been put in place. 2. Health Board Antenatal Fetal Monitoring Guidance. Following Nola-Reign’s death the serious incident review recommended new guidance to address antenatal fetal monitoring. However, the new local guidance for antenatal monitoring does not reference chorioamnionitis, transfer times or the need to consider continuous fetal monitoring. 3. Training. There is insufficient evidence from the Health Board of the nature or degree of training that has taken place since Nola-Reign’s death to assist obstetric and midwifery teams to identifying the risk of chorioamnionitis and to ensure adequate monitoring is in place in particular: 4. Delay in transferring between Antenatal and HDU wards. The delay in transferring Nola-Reign's mother from antenatal ward to HDU was over 1 hour in a situation when acuity was not raised. This issue was not identified by the Serious Incident Review yet was a material factor in the period when Nola-Reign's mother remained unmonitored and no steps have been taken to identify causes for delay and to avoid unnecessary delay occurring in the future. ”

    Source location

    Nola-Reign Morgan · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. Kent and Medway

    AI-generated summary

    Liam Andrew SUTTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Liam Sutton became unconscious at home after discharge following a total knee replacement with increased opioid medication, and was subsequently treated for suspected opioid toxicity, pneumonia or sepsis, respiratory complications and acute kidney injury. After intensive care treatment involving ventilation and repeated extubation attempts, he suffered an unresuscitable cardiac arrest during reintubation and died. The principal concerns were prolonged occupancy of the emergency department resuscitation area and hospital bed-blocking linked to delays in discharge and access to appropriate community or care placements.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to transfer patients from the emergency resuscitation area to suitable higher-acuity beds in a timely manner

    Wider context from the report

    “The court heard in the inquest revealed that the resuscitation department where Mr Sutton was admitted was busy and the evidence indicated that this was and is almost a daily occurrence at the Trust. Mr Sutton remained in the Emergency department resuscitation area for longer than 24 hours and should instead have been transferred to a suitable bed in the hospital. The Intensivist who gave evidence was clear that he should have been transferred to the High Dependency/ Intensive Care department and that patients who are admitted in a timely manner have a much better chance of survival. This also means that bays in the resuscitation department are not free to admit or attend to new acutely ill patients arriving at the hospital. The court heard that the main issue is trying to discharge a patient to a suitable area in the hospital to free up a cubicle or bay in the resuscitation department. This in turn is due to beds being occupied by patients who are medically fit to be discharged. On any given day we heard that up to a third of the hospital beds can be filled with patients who are fit to leave hospital. The court heard that the main delay is in discharging patients to appropriate settings or placements and the Trust have taken all steps they can internally to improve the flow of patients through the hospital. From the evidence the court heard it would appear that those responsible for providing care in the community including both the social care providers and the community healthcare providers are not providing either timely appropriate care packages in the patient's home or a bed in an alternative placement be that a nursing home or residential home placement. The evidence suggested that where patients were self funding the delays in discharge were less acute. This means patients are kept in hospital for longer and thus are more at risk of contracting hospital acquired illnesses themselves which could lead to their own death but are also blocking beds which are needed to treat patients who require acute care in a suitable setting. This is leading to patients being kept longer in the emergency department and reducing available space to receive new critically ill patients. Both of these options can lead to death and there is clearly a risk of death for others requiring clinical care in an acute hospital ”

    Source location

    Liam Andrew SUTTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  3. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Lina Piroli · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lina Piroli, aged 93, was admitted with an E. coli infection and later suffered an unstable C2 fracture and a stable L1 fracture after a fall down stairs. She remained in A&E for a prolonged period because no elderly care ward bed was available, while experiencing pain, confusion and delirium. The report raises concerns about delayed transfer to a ward and the resulting lack of access to specialist, coordinated care and appropriate symptom management for an elderly, complex patient.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of ward-bed capacity causing delayed transfer of elderly and complex medical patients from A&E

    Wider context from the report

    “When Lina presented to the Whittington Hospital on the evening of 2 February 2025 it was identified that due to her fractured spine, she would need a bed on an elderly care ward. She was accepted by the medical team but there were no beds available. This meant that she remained in A&E at a time when she was experiencing pain, confusion and delirium due to her injury, infection, pain, pain medication and dementia. I heard that there is guidance on how to treat people with dementia during a hospital admission but that this is simply not achievable in a busy and overcrowded emergency department. Lina was a complex presentation and 93 years old. Whilst Lina received the immediately necessary tests and treatment, she was not seen by the geriatric team (who do not work in A&E) and had delayed access to specialist nurses, robust symptom control measures, regular reviews and coordinated care. She remained in a busy, noisy and frightening environment. It was not until she was moved to a ward that advice was sought on the best management of her spinal fracture. The delay in transferring her to a ward was detrimental to optimising her chances of recovery. I heard evidence that this is not uncommon at the Whittington and is a problem across all London hospitals (and hospitals throughout the UK). When there are no ward beds to transfer patients to, they stay in A&E and A&E is not set up to deliver the care that, particularly elderly and complex medical, patients require. Nursing staff are having to treat double the number of patients that the department is designed to accommodate and patients who require care and treatment outside of their expertise. This means that patients are not receiving the appropriate level of care. ”

    Source location

    Lina Piroli · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish and implement the two-year Urgent and Emergency Care Recovery Plan to improve urgent and emergency care performance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England recognises the significant pressures on all NHS services and, in January 2023, published a two-year Urgent & Emergency Care (UEC) Recovery Plan. The plan prioritised improvements to the 4-hour standard – a constitutional standard aiming for 95% of patients to be admitted, transferred, or discharged within four hours of arrival. The plan outlined key actions to recover and improve urgent and emergency care services. Despite significant challenges, including high demand for services, there was an improvement in the headline ambition between 2023 and 2025.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish the 2025/26 Urgent and Emergency Care Plan to improve hospital flow, reduce prolonged waits and eliminate corridor care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Recognising that there is further work to be done, in June 2025, NHS England published the Urgent and Emergency Care Plan for 2025/26 which included an ambition to ‘improve flow through hospitals with a particular focus on patients waiting over 12 hours and making progress on eliminating corridor care’. NHS England is”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with regions to support acute trusts in eliminating emergency-department crowding through improved patient flow and length of stay.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “working with the regions to support Acute Trusts to eliminate crowding in EDs in the longer term. Improvements are being progressed through NHS England’s operational planning guidance, where Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) were asked to focus on delivering improved patient flow. This has included increasing the productivity of acute and non-acute healthcare services, improving flow and length of stay, as well as clinical outcomes. In addition to this, we are continuing to develop services that shift activity from acute hospital settings to settings outside of an acute hospital for patients with unplanned urgent needs, supporting proactive care, alternatives to admission and improving hospital discharge.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue developing services that shift unplanned urgent care outside acute hospitals, support alternatives to admission and improve discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “working with the regions to support Acute Trusts to eliminate crowding in EDs in the longer term. Improvements are being progressed through NHS England’s operational planning guidance, where Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) were asked to focus on delivering improved patient flow. This has included increasing the productivity of acute and non-acute healthcare services, improving flow and length of stay, as well as clinical outcomes. In addition to this, we are continuing to develop services that shift activity from acute hospital settings to settings outside of an acute hospital for patients with unplanned urgent needs, supporting proactive care, alternatives to admission and improving hospital discharge.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete a national bed-occupancy reduction sprint to reduce occupancy and improve timely movement of patients to ward beds.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England also undertook a bed occupancy reduction sprint to manage demand nationally, which commenced in October 2025 and concluded on 24th December 2025. This has enabled a reduced bed occupancy and enabled providers to respond to surges in demand that the NHS traditionally experiences during winter, enabling patients to move in a more timely manner to ward beds.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Invest £250 million to expand same-day and urgent care services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Investing £250 million into expanding same day and urgent care services, helping avoid unnecessary admissions to hospital and supporting faster diagnosis, treatment and discharge for patients.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Improve hospital flow by reducing waits exceeding 12 hours and progressing towards eliminating corridor care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Improve hospital flow, with a focus on reducing the number of patients waiting more than 12 hours and making progress towards eliminating corridor care.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Increase bed capacity by reducing average stays for overnight emergency admissions by at least 0.4 days.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Increasing bed capacity by reducing the average length of stay for patients requiring an overnight emergency admission by at least 0.4 days returning closer to pre-pandemic levels.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen collaboration between hospital and community services to support earlier discharge planning and safer transitions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Regarding specialist care for the elderly, we recognise that older people are particularly vulnerable to long waits and delayed discharges. We are therefore investing in specialist frailty pathways, expanding the community workforce, and embedding elderly care expertise throughout urgent and emergency care. Initiatives such as frailty Same Day Emergency Care units, rapid front-door frailty team input, and integrated neighbourhood teams are designed to ensure older people receive timely, specialist assessment and support. We are also working to increase the number of geriatricians and frailty specialists, and to strengthen collaboration between hospital and community services, so that discharge planning starts earlier and transitions are safer.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NHS England will respond fully to concerns about A&E waiting times, hospital bed availability, and specialist elderly care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The report raises concerns over A&E waiting times, hospital bed availability, and specialist care for the elderly. In preparing this response, my officials have made enquiries with NHS England and I understand they will be responding to your concerns in full.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 December 2025

    Open published response
  4. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Tracey Ostler · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Tracey Ostler, who had severe Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder and a history of self-harm and overdoses, took an overdose and cut her wrists on 12 June 2023. After paramedics attended her home on 16 June following a further overdose, they left her there after deciding she had capacity to refuse hospital treatment; she was later found unconscious and died in hospital on 18 June 2023. The principal concerns were inadequate capacity assessment and clinical consultation, failures to share information and coordinate mental-health and ambulance care, the absence of multi-agency safety planning, and insufficient psychiatric hospital beds.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of psychiatric hospital beds resulting in prolonged emergency department detention

    Wider context from the report

    “Lack of Psychiatric Hospital Beds in Surrey and arrangements for detaining patients assessed to require Mental Health Act section in the Emergency Department of Epsom General Hospital: , Addressed to Epsom General Hospital, Surrey and Borders Partnership , South West London Integrated Care Board and the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care 1. I heard evidence that there is an acknowledged concern in Epsom General Hospital’s emergency department that patients with psychiatric presentations, who are assessed to require compulsory admission under the Mental Health Act 1983, are detained without being under section in the emergency department awaiting psychiatric beds. The longest wait by such a patient in these circumstances has been 6 weeks. There have been up to 10 psychiatric patients at any one time being held in the emergency department awaiting a psychiatric bed. 2. I remain concerned that there in no plan to stop this practice and that therefore: a.) Psychiatric patients in an acute state are being held in an unsuitable environment without access to appropriate ward based care under a multi-disciplinary psychiatric team. b.) One to one nursing is meant to be provided by mental health nurses however, there are not always available and emergency department staff who are not trained in mental health nursing provide the nursing to them. This reduces the number of nurses available for physical health care nursing and means nurses from the wrong discipline and experience are caring for acute psychiatric patients. c.) The emergency department environment is noisy and confusing and inimical to the health and recovery of psychiatric patients. d.) The patients cannot be detained under the Mental Health Act 1983 whilst in the emergency department. There is a significant risk that some of them are being detained unlawfully, without recourse to the legal safeguards provided by the Mental Health Act 1983. In addition, they do not have a Responsible Clinician. e.) Medical staff make decisions about how to prevent these patients leaving the department if they decide to leave, instructing security staff to prevent this, using powers said to derive under common law which I was told was a grey area. f.) The ability of the emergency department to fulfil the needs of their physically ill patients is significantly compromised by this arrangement. g.) There is an acknowledged risk that psychiatric patients being cared for in the emergency department are under the care of both medical and psychiatric teams which can impact decision making and obscure who has ultimate responsibility for the patient. ”

    Source location

    Tracey Ostler · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Increase the number of funded inpatient mental health beds for the Trust’s population.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has taken steps to mitigate the demand for beds at a local level, including by embedding Operational Pressures Escalation Levels (OPEL) procedures into practice, recent investment in an increased number of funded beds for the Trust’s population, and improvement work aimed at reducing the length of inpatient stay.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue improving service flow, aligning operational processes and reducing unnecessary inpatient delays and length of stay.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has taken steps to mitigate the demand for beds at a local level, including by embedding Operational Pressures Escalation Levels (OPEL) procedures into practice, recent investment in an increased number of funded beds for the Trust’s population, and improvement work aimed at reducing the length of inpatient stay.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue the Mind and Body Provider Collaborative improvement programme with acute care partners, using clinical, escalation and risk-management frameworks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Further improvement work continues through the Mind and Body Provider Collaborative, which is a programme of work chaired by our Chief Nursing Officer and undertaken with our acute care partners.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide daily escalation and weekly executive oversight of patients awaiting psychiatric admission through collaboration with SABP and the ICB.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust works collaboratively with SABP to ensure that these delays are kept to a minimum. Every patient awaiting psychiatric admission is subject to daily escalation through Trust site meetings and concerns are raised with SABP and the ICB. Executive led weekly meetings between the Trust and SABP provides further oversight of plans for mental health patients at the Trust. The Trust continues to advocate for timely transfer to inpatient psychiatric units recognising that ED cannot provide the ward-based, multidisciplinary care these patients require.”

    Source location

    Response from Epsom General Hospital
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain regular cross-boundary system calls and agreed escalation arrangements between Epsom General Hospital and mental health providers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The cross-boundary arrangement at EGH requires coordination between the two mental health providers (SABP and SWLStG) and the two commissioners (SW London ICB and Surrey & Borders ICB). Routine actions underway include regular system calls and agreed escalation arrangements between EGH and mental health providers.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS South West London Integrated Care Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with the commissioned mental health trust to improve the urgent care pathway, maximise appropriate crisis alternatives, and reduce delays in accessing inpatient beds.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “SW London works closely with SWLSTG to address delays in the urgent care pathway and minimise delays in access to beds. This work is focused on both improving the inpatient pathway and maximising use of crisis alternatives where appropriate and able to meet patient needs. Such services include the 24/7 crisis lines, ‘111 press 2 for mental health service’, community-based crisis cafés, and Home Treatment Teams.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS South West London Integrated Care Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use the assessment outputs to identify pathway gaps, support future commissioning and winter planning, and produce tailored improvement plans for mental healthcare delivery.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The outputs of this work will identify gaps within current pathways and support future commissioning plans, including winter planning. It will also provide tailored improvement plans aimed at enhancing mental healthcare delivery within SWLSTG and reducing demand and delays in emergency departments across SW London.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS South West London Integrated Care Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Providing mental health care for patients without physical health needs is outside the Trust’s commissioned remit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust is an acute trust, offering inpatient physical healthcare services at Epsom Hospital and St Helier Hospital. For patients within our locality, mental health services are provided by Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (‘SABP’). Whilst we are not commissioned to provide care for patients who do not have physical health needs, we acknowledge and are mindful of the situation that is faced across the country where the demand for mental health services far exceeds the availability. We work collaboratively with our partners in SABP to provide care for patients whilst they remain in the Trust. I welcome the opportunity to respond to your concerns on behalf of the Trust.”

    Source location

    Response from Epsom General Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Surrey and Borders Partnership provides local mental health services, while NHS Surrey Heartlands ICB commissions those services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS Surrey Heartlands ICB (‘the ICB’) is the responsible ICB for the geographical area in which the Trust sits. It is responsible for commissioning the mental health care provision for the population within its geographical area.”

    Source location

    Response from Epsom General Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Individual trusts and local health systems are responsible for assessing and managing local psychiatric bed capacity.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We expect individual trusts and local health systems to effectively assess and manage local bed capacity through the ‘flow’ of patients being discharged or moving to another setting.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Surrey patients’ psychiatric beds are commissioned by Surrey Heartlands ICB from Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Psychiatric beds for patients who require inpatient care and present at the emergency department at Epsom General Hospital (EGH) are commissioned separately depending on GP registration. SW London patients are admitted to South West London & St George’s NHS Mental Health Trust (SWLStG), commissioned by SW London ICB. Surrey patients are admitted to Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (SABP), commissioned by Surrey Heartlands ICB.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS South West London Integrated Care Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Individual trusts and local health systems are responsible for assessing and managing local psychiatric bed capacity.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We expect individual trusts and local health systems to effectively assess and manage local bed capacity through the ‘flow’ of patients being discharged or moving to another setting.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 August 2025

    Open published response
  5. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Bernard Lyon · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Bernard Lyon, who had dysphagia and was living at Hyde Nursing Home, developed sepsis and aspiration pneumonia and died at Tameside General Hospital on 30 January 2024. The report describes concerns about the nursing home's management capacity, staffing and adherence to his modified diet plan, as well as multi-agency oversight, communication with families, ambulance handover delays and delays in administering antibiotics in a very busy emergency department.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient emergency-department bed capacity causing delays in patient transfer

    Wider context from the report

    “7. The inquest was told that the build-up of patients and levels of demand in the ED at TGH were not unusual and continued. As an illustration of the ongoing nature of the demand in recent months one patient has waited in ED for 3 days for a bed. The delay in transfer was due to an ongoing demand for beds and delayed discharges of patients medically optimised but with no suitable non acute/community provision being available. ”

    Source location

    Bernard Lyon · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    CQC relies on ongoing monitoring, performance data and targeted inspections for emergency services rather than additional action on emergency-department resourcing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Resourcing of the ED service and others across the country is a known risk and is subject to ongoing monitoring through engagement with the Trust and available data. Waiting times and other national targets receive close monitoring. CQC carry out inspections of urgent and emergency services in those trusts that are performing poorly in line with national ED targets. In comparison to other Manchester trusts and similar trusts in the Northwest, Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust has not flagged as one of the poorest performers in relation to ambulance waits outside the department and waiting times within the department. Performance data is always discussed in engagement with the Trust.”

    Source location

    Response from CQC
    Page 6 · response
    Published 16 April 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Secretary of State may be better placed to address hospital bed demand and delayed discharges because the issue involves complex competing budgetary demands.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have given careful consideration to this point and note that this report has also been sent to the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care and believe they will be of greater assistance in addressing this aspect of your concerns, the picture being complex with competing demands on budgets and the subsequent effects on patient care. CQC continue to monitor through engagement with the Trust and draw on our findings from CQC’s national NHS patient survey programme and statutory reports, our inspection activity, bespoke research into people’s experiences, insight from key stakeholders, and the evidence that our expert staff have collected throughout the year about the quality and safety of services in all areas of health and care. Our inspections in urgent and emergency care across the country found issues around triage and patient flow that affect”

    Source location

    Response from CQC
    Page 6 · response
    Published 16 April 2025

    Open published response
  6. Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

    AI-generated summary

    PATRICIA ANNE VAN DER EYKEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Patricia Anne Van Der Eyken, aged 93, called 999 with chest pain radiating down her left arm on 13 September 2023 and was found deceased when an ambulance arrived two hours and 37 minutes later. The principal concern was a systemic ambulance delay linked to healthcare and social care capacity and handover failures, which the court found likely contributed to her death by preventing lifesaving treatment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to transfer patients from emergency departments to hospital wards when clinically indicated

    Wider context from the report

    “8. It was found that the build-up of patients in wards (patients who are medically fit for discharge) means that the hospitals are, at times, unable to transfer patients from the emergency department to hospital wards when clinically indicated. This in turn leads to a build up of patients in emergency departments. This leads to handover delays between ambulance and hospital, namely ambulance crews being unable to transfer patients from ambulances into the emergency department. It was found that there is a strong correlation between ambulance handover delays and increasing ambulance response times. The report stated: “It is as simple as the longer a patient is waiting in an ambulance outside a hospital, the longer the next patient will wait for an ambulance”. 9. The investigation report states ‘…SWAST is experiencing by far the highest levels of handover delays seen in the Trust’s history. Handover delays result in multiple ambulance resources being held at hospitals for extended periods, thereby limiting the number of resources on the road to respond to waiting incidents. With fewer resources on the road, the response times to patients inevitably increases… ….The impact of the delays …is devastating, most significant, and most immediately evident to patients and their families and carers. Less evident is the secondary, detrimental effect these delays can bring to the service as a whole. This investigation found that delays are having an additional profound impact on staff morale and their mental wellbeing.” 10. The court considered SWAST performance data for 2023 in connection with handover delays between ambulances and hospitals. There is a target for crews to handover the care of their patients within 15 minutes of arriving at an Emergency Department. Anything above this constitutes a delay which impacts on the availability of resources. The data revealed that in September 2023, handover delays (in excess of 15 minutes), cost the ambulance service 2,981 hours at Treliske. This is equivalent to 271 ambulance crew shifts. At Derriford in the same month, handover delays (in excess of 15 minutes) cost the ambulance service 6,359 hours, which is equivalent to 581 ambulance crew shifts. ”

    Source location

    PATRICIA ANNE VAN DER EYKEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide £1 billion to increase staffed core hospital beds by 5,000 and improve patient flow and bed capacity.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your report highlights that SWAST and local hospitals were experiencing high demand and long handover delays. To support ambulance services, ambulance trusts received £200 million of additional funding in 2023/24 to expand capacity and improve response times. In addition, to improve patient flow and bed capacity within hospitals £1 billion of dedicated funding was provided to increase staffed core hospital beds by 5,000 compared to 2022/23 plans.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 April 2024

    Open published response
  7. Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

    AI-generated summary

    ROBERT ANDREW PROWSE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Robert Andrew Prowse, who was 86, became unconscious and was suspected of having had a seizure before an ambulance was called. The ambulance arrived after a delay of three hours and 47 minutes, and further delays occurred in transferring him into the emergency department, where sepsis was identified; he died before prescribed antibiotics could be administered. The report identified systemic ambulance and hospital delays, including emergency department crowding and delayed patient handovers, as concerns that likely contributed to preventing lifesaving treatment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to transfer emergency department patients to hospital wards when clinically indicated

    Wider context from the report

    “6. In other words, the investigations found that there is a direct link between failings in social care provision and ambulance delays. The failings in social care provision were found to have a knock-on effect through healthcare services. It was found that at times hospitals were unable to transfer patients from hospital wards into the community when clinically indicated. This is because of the difficulty in securing sufficient domiciliary or residential care, as and when required. This leads to delayed discharges from hospital of patients deemed medically fit for discharge. 7. Furthermore, it was found that delayed discharge can lead to an increase in rehabilitation and care needs. This is an effect of delayed discharge leading to further impact upon hospital capacity. 8. It was found that the build-up of patients in wards (patients who are medically fit for discharge) means that the hospitals are, at times, unable to transfer patients from the emergency department to hospital wards when clinically indicated. This in turn leads to a build up of patients in emergency departments. ”

    Source location

    ROBERT ANDREW PROWSE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain the uplift of 5,000 staffed, permanent hospital beds delivered through the urgent and emergency care plan.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your report also highlights that Royal Cornwall Hospital was experiencing high demand with long handover delays. I recognise that ambulance trusts work within a health and care system and issues such as delayed patient handovers to hospitals, as you rightly identify in your report, can impact on capacity and response times. That is why a key part of the delivery plan is about improving patient flow and bed capacity within hospitals. We achieved our 2023/24 ambition of delivering 5,000 more staffed, permanent hospital beds this year compared to 2022/23 plans, backed by £1 billion of dedicated funding, and we will maintain this capacity uplift in 2024/25. We have also achieved our target of scaling up virtual ward bed capacity to over 10,000 ahead of winter 2023/24, and there are now over 12,000 beds available nationally.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Invest an additional £1 billion through the Discharge Fund to support timely and effective hospital discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are also investing an additional £1 billion this year through the Discharge Fund, to support the NHS and local authorities to ensure timely and effective discharge from hospital. This funding follows £600 million last year and £500 million in 2022/23. The NHS and local authorities are using this funding to help provide people with the right care in the right place when they are discharged from hospital. We have also ensured every acute hospital has access to a care transfer hub, bringing together professionals from the NHS and social care to manage discharges for people with more complex needs who need extra support with a view to promoting early planning and timely discharge. These measures are helping improve patient flow through hospitals, reducing delays in patient handovers so ambulances can swiftly get back on the roads.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ensure every acute hospital has access to a care transfer hub supporting complex discharges and early planning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are also investing an additional £1 billion this year through the Discharge Fund, to support the NHS and local authorities to ensure timely and effective discharge from hospital. This funding follows £600 million last year and £500 million in 2022/23. The NHS and local authorities are using this funding to help provide people with the right care in the right place when they are discharged from hospital. We have also ensured every acute hospital has access to a care transfer hub, bringing together professionals from the NHS and social care to manage discharges for people with more complex needs who need extra support with a view to promoting early planning and timely discharge. These measures are helping improve patient flow through hospitals, reducing delays in patient handovers so ambulances can swiftly get back on the roads.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 April 2024

    Open published response
  8. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Abdullah Popalzai · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Abdullah Popalzai was a remand prisoner at HMP Pentonville who was found hanging in his cell on 29 November 2019, and his death was confirmed by paramedics. He had acute psychosis and required transfer to a psychiatric unit, but no suitable bed was available for a prolonged period. The principal concern was that acutely psychotic prisoners refusing treatment were being left untreated and at risk of deterioration because suitable psychiatric hospital beds were not becoming available in a timely way.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of suitable psychiatric hospital bed spaces in a timely way

    Wider context from the report

    “1) Prisoners who are acutely psychotic and refusing treatment that requires transfer to hospital under the Mental Health Act are being left untreated and at risk of further deterioration due to a shortage of suitable psychiatric hospital bed spaces becoming available in a timely way. ”

    Source location

    Abdullah Popalzai · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Increase timely access to psychiatric hospital beds and provide earlier identification, treatment and support for people in custody who need mental healthcare.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England is committed to ensuring access to timely, responsive, and least restrictive mental health care and is already working to address this in this area by focusing on increasing access to hospital beds pre-sentence, rather than prison being used as a place of safety.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Address concerns and lessons identified in the HMIP review of delays transferring mentally unwell prisoners.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “His Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP) recently published the report The long wait: A thematic review of delays in the transfer of mentally unwell prisoners which outlines similar issues. NHS England is also addressing the areas of concern and lessons learnt within this report.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 February 2024

    Open published response
  9. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Evelyn Mary Dutton · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Evelyn Mary Dutton, who had severe systemic sclerosis, was admitted after an accidental fall that caused a fractured neck of femur. Her nutritional status remained compromised, and she developed complications including electrolyte imbalance, vomiting blood and duodenal ulcers before deteriorating and dying in hospital on 13 August 2022. The report raised concerns about prolonged ambulance and hospital transfer delays for elderly frail patients with hip fractures.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in transfer from the Emergency Department to a ward for elderly frail patients with hip fractures

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The inquest heard evidence that after her fall, on 28th June 2022, despite her age and frailty there was a prolonged wait for an ambulance to take her to hospital. This was due to the demands on the ambulance service that day. Once they reached hospital Mrs Dutton had to remain in the ambulance until a space became available for her in the Emergency Department. This was due to the pressure on the Emergency Department and was replicated across Greater Manchester. Once in the Emergency Department she then remained there until transfer to a ward on 29th June when a bed became available; 2. The evidence was that long waits for transfer to hospital and delays in being transferred to wards presented a significant risk to the health and wellbeing of elderly frail patients with hip fractures such as Mrs Dutton. The inquest was told that these delays were not unusual in summer of 2022. ”

    Source location

    Evelyn Mary Dutton · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Improve patient flow through hospitals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The plan outlines the actions and steps that we are taking across England to recover and improve urgent and emergency care services, including improving ambulance response times, increasing ambulance capacity through growing the workforce, improving flow through hospitals, speeding up discharges from hospitals, expanding new services in the community, and taking steps to tackle unwarranted variation in performance in the most challenged local systems.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Speed up hospital discharges.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The plan outlines the actions and steps that we are taking across England to recover and improve urgent and emergency care services, including improving ambulance response times, increasing ambulance capacity through growing the workforce, improving flow through hospitals, speeding up discharges from hospitals, expanding new services in the community, and taking steps to tackle unwarranted variation in performance in the most challenged local systems.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide community alternatives to hospital admission through urgent response, virtual wards, enhanced care-home support and proactive care services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “You also raised a concern over the delays transferring patients to hospital and wards and the risks to health and wellbeing of elderly, frail patients, such as Evelyn, this caused. NHS England’s services such as Urgent Community Response and Virtual”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Increase intermediate-care throughput to reduce acute-bed discharge delays and accelerate admissions from emergency departments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Wards, Enhanced Health in Care Homes, and the development of Proactive Care services, are designed to offer support and timely access to alternatives to hospital admission. Whilst Evelyn required acute hospital care for her hip fracture, these improvements aim to reduce delays for those that do require urgent, inpatient care. Measures are also in place to increase throughput in Intermediate Care (IC) to help reduce delays in discharge from acute beds and speed up admission from ED.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response
  10. North Wales (East and Central)

    AI-generated summary

    Philip Hawkins · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Philip Hawkins, aged 97, suffered a fall at home on 18 March 2023, was transferred by ambulance to hospital, and died on 23 March 2023. Concerns included delays in being admitted and allocated a bed, insufficient staffing, inability to provide care, gaps in nursing documentation, and failures in aspects of assessment and treatment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in allocation of hospital beds from the Emergency Department

    Wider context from the report

    “Entry into Hospital and Delay to bed allocation 1. Mr Hawkins arrived at hospital at 13:25 on 18.03.23 and remained in the ambulance until 23:42 when he was ‘offloaded’ onto a corridor in the Emergency Department (ED). 2. He was moved to a rapid assessment room in the ED at 11:33 on 19.03.23 and then into a cubicle at 21:47, the same day. 3. Mr Hawkins was eventually allocated to a bed from the ED, at 19:17 on 20.03.23. ”

    Source location

    Philip Hawkins · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026