Recurring concern

Unreliable NHS-private mental-health discharge and referral arrangements

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 11 May 2015•Latest report 5 Sep 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in NHS-private mental-health arrangements for determining referral eligibility, maintaining responsibility, coordinating discharge, sharing relevant information and preserving community or continuing care when patients receive private psychiatric care or move between NHS and private providers.

Not included

  • Excludes general NHS or private mental-health service capacity, treatment quality or appointment-access failures where the NHS-private discharge or referral interface is not the unsafe condition.
  • Excludes ordinary hospital discharge or mental-health discharge failures without a material transition between NHS and private psychiatric care.
  • Excludes generic inter-provider communication or care-coordination failures where no NHS-private mental-health discharge or referral context is identified.
  • Excludes failures occurring after responsibility and continuing-care arrangements have been clearly established and the remaining issue is the quality of treatment.
Reports
6

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
7

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2015–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
12

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care3
NHS England2
Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust1
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust1
Cheshire and Wirral Partnership NHS Foundation Trust1
Department for Education1
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust1
Health and Safety Executive1
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board1
Priory Group1
South West London and St George'S Mental Health NHS Trust1
Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. North Yorkshire and York

    AI-generated summary

    Victoria Anne TAYLOR · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Victoria Anne Taylor’s mental health deteriorated between May and October 2024, involving suicidal ideation, self-harm and binge drinking. She was reported missing on 1 October 2024, and her body was recovered from the River Derwent on 22 October 2024. The principal concerns were that mental health services did not offer a treatment pathway addressing reported childhood trauma, provided limited safety planning, and did not suggest or convene a multi-agency approach despite knowing that several agencies were involved.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to explain the rationale, provision and NHS alternatives for a private psychotherapy referral

    Wider context from the report

    “Ms Taylor was assessed on three separate occasions between mid-May 2024 and the end of August 2024 by members of the Crisis and Acute Hospitals Liaison Teams. Ms Taylor was clear during all three assessments that her episodes of binge drinking and impulsive acts of self harm were the result of unresolved childhood trauma. Despite that, secondary mental health services considered there was no role for them in offering support or a treatment pathway to her. The safety plans agreed following these assessments were therefore limited and offered Ms Taylor no additional support beyond that which she was already accessing through the Horizons service. The assessment documents contained no discussion of treatment pathways for addressing trauma which might be accessed through the Community Mental Health Team, and no indication that such pathways had been offered to Ms Taylor and rejected by her. Instead, it was suggested at the second assessment that Ms Taylor may wish to refer herself to a named private psychotherapy service at some point in the future. There was no rationale included in the second assessment for naming this service, and no explanation of what it might provide or why this could not be offered on the NHS via the CMHT. When Ms Taylor indicated at her third assessment that she had left a message with this private provider and received no response from them, the third safety plan simply suggested she try again. Mental Health services were aware at the time of the second and third assessments that a number of agencies were involved with Ms Taylor, but no multi-agency meeting or approach was suggested or called by them to consider the most appropriate support for Ms Taylor. ”

    Source location

    Victoria Anne TAYLOR · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. Inner West London

    AI-generated summary

    Judith Maike OBHOLZER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mrs Obholzer died by suicide on 12 July 2023 after jumping in front of a moving train, following a significant period of worsening depression and anxiety. Concerns included delays in NHS mental-health assessment and waiting-list placement, unclear routes for private practitioners to obtain NHS crisis support, difficulties contacting her GP, and the absence of shared medical notes between private and NHS providers.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clarity in referral and crisis-support processes for patients receiving private and NHS treatment

    Wider context from the report

    “1. In the course of the evidence it was confirmed that there is a significant pressure on NHS mental health services. It seems likely that there will be an increase in patients obtaining private support while waiting for NHS support (and often only being able to afford such support for a limited time and to a limited extent and doing so only while waiting for NHS support), as happened in this case. Consideration should be given to ensuring that there is sufficient clarity in processes such as referrals and crisis support where private practitioners are providing treatment as well as the NHS, ensuring sharing of information and notes where relevant and necessary and ensuring that the NHS provision is not assessed as unnecessary simply because someone has obtained private support as an interim measure. ”

    Source location

    Judith Maike OBHOLZER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unclear urgent and crisis referral pathways from private practitioners to NHS services

    Wider context from the report

    “2. In the course of the evidence the private consultant psychiatrist gave evidence that he was unable to refer patients directly to NHS provided crisis teams as a direct alternative to informal treatment at a private hospital. The evidence from the South West London and St George’s Mental Health Trust was that direct referrals can be made although the evidence on the exact mechanism was unclear. In Mrs Obholzer’s case, the (apparent) lack of ability of the private consultant psychiatrist to directly refer to the crisis team meant that she did not receive the community crisis support alternative to hospital admission that she required. Consideration should be given to ensuring that the pathway for urgent/crisis referrals from private practitioners to the NHS are clear to all (both for this area and throughout the country) and, if it is not already the case, to ensuring a process that allows private practitioners to arrange crisis support through the NHS directly. ”

    Source location

    Judith Maike OBHOLZER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain a ratified Private Providers Shared Care Policy defining Trust and private-provider roles and responsibilities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “However, in addition to the DH guidance, the Trust has a ‘Private Providers Shared Care Policy’ (Appendix 1) which was ratified in January 2024. This clearly sets out the respective roles and responsibilities of the Trust and private providers. This policy was drafted with input from Consultant Psychiatrists from a private provider and supplements the DH guidance to add specific clarity for the Trust.”

    Source location

    Response from SW London Mental Health Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Make the Private Providers Shared Care Policy accessible on the Trust website and communicate its existence internally and through local GP networks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust accepts that this policy was not referenced and it appears there was a lack of appreciation that the policy existed during the Inquest. In response to the concern raised in the PFDR, the Trust will ensure this policy is made accessible on the Trust's website (in the GPs/Professionals section of our website) and its existence will be further communicated internally and also through our local GP networks.”

    Source location

    Response from SW London Mental Health Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Improve and publish prominent website information directing healthcare professionals to urgent mental-health crisis referrals, including the 24/7 crisis line.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to the PFDR, the Trust has reviewed and further improved the information available for all healthcare professionals on the Trust website to ensure it is more easily accessible. The link (button) on the front page of the website is now red to make it even more prominent and marked ‘Urgent Help’ (Home - Website (swlstg.nhs.uk)).”

    Source location

    Response from SW London Mental Health Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share crisis-referral information externally through social media, website news articles, and campaign materials.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Additionally, we have again shared our crisis information externally, which we do at regular intervals. This includes on social media and in extra places on our website including news articles and in information about our campaigns.”

    Source location

    Response from SW London Mental Health Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind staff about the Urgent Care Pathway, checking private treatment and consent, and the Private Providers Shared Care Policy through a Monthly Learning Bulletin and local GP networks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust will remind all staff of the ‘Urgent Care Pathway’ in a Monthly Learning Bulletin article (to be published by October 2024). Staff will also be reminded to regularly check if service users are receiving private treatment and discuss consent to share information. Staff will also be signposted to the Trust’s ‘Private Providers Shared Care Policy’, so they are aware of the process if they are contacted by a private provider regarding a patient in crisis. This policy will also be shared through our local GP networks.”

    Source location

    Response from SW London Mental Health Trust
    Page 6 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the interface between NHS and non-NHS-funded independent health providers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Work is also in progress to review the interface between the NHS and non-NHS funded independent health providers. This work is in its infancy, but NHS England can provide an update to the Coroner in due course if this would assist. We understand that the Care Quality Commission (CQC) are also undertaking work regarding standards for online care and are exploring opportunities for better sharing of information both into private sector providers and receiving information back to the patient’s registered GP practice from private providers.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Expand urgent and emergency mental health care and access to crisis services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of its Long Term Plan commitments to improve mental health care, NHS England has increased investment in adult and older adult community mental health services by £1 billion per year since 2019/20. Commitments in the plan have also included a significant expansion of urgent and emergency mental health care and access to crisis services.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    No national or local system provides contact details for every private provider, so referral information cannot feasibly reach all providers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Unfortunately, there is currently no national or local system which enables the Trust to have the contact details of every private provider operating in its catchment area and, therefore, it is not feasible to provide information about the referral process to all these providers and those we are not aware exists. Furthermore, in Mrs Obholzer’s case, the private provider that gave evidence at the Inquest and who assessed Mrs Obholzer shortly before her death, was not based in the catchment for our Trust.”

    Source location

    Response from SW London Mental Health Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Private providers can refer patients directly to crisis services through the Mental Health Crisis Line, 111, 999 or A&E.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “However, the Trust would like to assure the Coroner that private providers can refer their patients to the Trust’s crisis services when required. Private providers can telephone or make a referral about someone they are concerned for to our crisis services via the Trust’s Mental Health Crisis Line in the same way as a GP or other non-Trust health professional. If a private provider contacts the Mental Health Crisis Line, advice will be provided, and their patient will be directed into the correct care pathway dependent upon the patient’s presentation and risk factors. In an emergency scenario, private providers can also call 999 or 111 and patients are able to attend A&E to access the pathway for crisis services.”

    Source location

    Response from SW London Mental Health Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The relevant NHS mental health trust is responsible for providing further information about its emergency referral signposting for private providers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England has also engaged with South West London and St George’s Mental Health NHS Trust. They have advised us that at the time Judith required NHS crisis support, their website provided clear signposting for private providers needing to make an emergency mental health referral. Since receiving your Report, we also note that they have made this more visually prominent on the website. I will refer you to the Trust for further information, who I understand are issuing their own response to you.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    National review of psychiatric referral pathways is considered a matter for the Department of Health and NHS England.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust notes the Coroner’s desire that this aspect of the PFDR is reviewed from a national perspective and considers that the DH and NHSE will be able to address this within their response.”

    Source location

    Response from SW London Mental Health Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response
  3. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Benjamin Sulzbacher · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Benjamin Sulzbacher had experienced deteriorating mental health and was admitted to a private hospital after attempting to tie a ligature at home. After discharge, no referral was made to the NHS Home Based Treatment Team, and he died after tying a ligature on 27 September 2023. Concerns included uncertainty among services about NHS discharge support for private inpatients and a lack of understanding at the Priory about the community services available.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unclear eligibility for NHS discharge service referral for private paying inpatients

    Wider context from the report

    “1. It was unclear to all services as to whether a private paying inpatient (who would have qualified for care under the NHS but due to bed availability went private) would be entitled to be referred to the discharge services offered by the NHS. The NHS provides more than the private sector in respect of community discharge packages and can be engaged with someone for longer. Importantly the face to face contact enables a better understanding of how a patient is actually presenting when considering their mental health. ”

    Source location

    Mr Benjamin Sulzbacher · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Consider clarifying statutory discharge guidance so commissioners and providers understand its application to independent mental health services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I would expect the Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board to provide details about how this works from a local perspective in its response to you. However, the Department will consider, in collaboration with other partners, whether, in light of this tragic case, the guidance could be made clearer to ensure that all mental health commissioners and providers are aware of how it applies to the independent sector.”

    Source location

    Benjamin Sulzbacher - Prevention of Future Deaths Report and Responses Bundle
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain an out-of-area placement team to bridge private hospitals and local NHS mental health services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Locally, Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust (PCFT) now have an out of area placement team who help bridge the gap between the private hospitals and PCFT.”

    Source location

    Benjamin Sulzbacher - Prevention of Future Deaths Report and Responses Bundle
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Raise the case during quality assurance visits to providers, highlighting NHS referral access for privately funded patients and robust discharge planning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We will be raising this case at our quality assurance visits to providers over the coming weeks, highlighting how private providers can refer all patients (both NHS and privately funded) into NHS services and the importance of robust discharge planning. We will also be sharing this learning at the Greater Manchester System Quality Group in July and at the Greater Manchester Mental Health Programme Board.”

    Source location

    Benjamin Sulzbacher - Prevention of Future Deaths Report and Responses Bundle
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a standard operating procedure clarifying aftercare pathways, including 72-hour follow-up and consideration of NHS referrals regardless of funding arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As such, Priory has created a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) (Appendix 1) which makes the aftercare pathways clearer and includes provisions that:”

    Source location

    Benjamin Sulzbacher - Prevention of Future Deaths Report and Responses Bundle
    Page 6 · response
    Published 12 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board is expected to explain how NHS discharge arrangements operate locally.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I would expect the Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board to provide details about how this works from a local perspective in its response to you. However, the Department will consider, in collaboration with other partners, whether, in light of this tragic case, the guidance could be made clearer to ensure that all mental health commissioners and providers are aware of how it applies to the independent sector.”

    Source location

    Benjamin Sulzbacher - Prevention of Future Deaths Report and Responses Bundle
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Private mental health inpatients may access NHS services after discharge in most cases, rather than having an unrestricted entitlement.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As a general principle, we consider that it is well-established that in the majority of cases, private mental health inpatients may access NHS services following discharge but we accept that it would be helpful if options could be explained more clearly to patients and families so that they can make informed choices about aftercare.”

    Source location

    Benjamin Sulzbacher - Prevention of Future Deaths Report and Responses Bundle
    Page 6 · response
    Published 12 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NHS referral may be unachievable where criteria are unmet, consent is absent, the team refuses, or initial contact remains unconfirmed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “However, we acknowledge that there will be occasions when an NHS referral is not achievable such as:”

    Source location

    Benjamin Sulzbacher - Prevention of Future Deaths Report and Responses Bundle
    Page 6 · response
    Published 12 August 2024

    Open published response
  4. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Hannah Dolly Kaur Bharaj · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Hannah Dolly Kaur Bharaj had anorexia, depression and fluctuating suicidal ideation, and died at Salford Royal Hospital on 13 July 2018 from injuries sustained after jumping from a first-floor café. Concerns included inadequate communication and discharge planning, unsuitable placement and care coordination, incomplete sharing of clinical information, and the safety of the café balustrade and adjacent table.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of mental health trusts to communicate placement information with private providers and families

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Communication with private providers by NHS trusts once mental health trusts have placed individuals in private settings. During the time that Hannah was placed at the Priory the mental health trust who placed her did not have any discussion with Hannah, her family or the Priory regarding the placement. A care coordinator had been allocated by the Trust once requested by the Priory but no care coordination had taken place; ”

    Source location

    Hannah Dolly Kaur Bharaj · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Inner West London

    AI-generated summary

    Peter George Garvin · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Peter George Garvin, who was under the care of a Community Mental Health Team while his medication was prescribed by his GP, entered the Regent’s Canal on 31 January 2018 with the intention of taking his own life. The report identifies concerns about communication between the CMHT and GP, insufficient local psychiatric beds, discharge from NHS care after seeking private psychiatric treatment, and the lack of an early carer’s assessment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discharge of NHS patients seeking private psychiatric care

    Wider context from the report

    “3. That if patients seek private psychiatric care they should not be discharged by the NHS. Instead a memorandum of understanding should be agreed between the NHS and Private psychiatric consultants to allow joint working and facilitate patient care. This should surely be possible along the lines of such agreements with GPs. ”

    Source location

    Peter George Garvin · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a staff protocol for coordinating NHS care with private psychiatric treatment and explaining the process to patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Because of the Trust’s location and geography we can potentially be working with any number of private psychiatrists which would make it impossible to have a standard MOU agreed by all of them in advance. As an alternative, we have drawn up a protocol for our own staff, which sets out (a) how they should work with colleagues working in any private sector organisation and (b) how they should explain the process to their patients. This draws heavily on national guidance.”

    Source location

    2019-0069-Response-by-CNWL-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 June 2019

    Open published response
  6. Berkshire

    AI-generated summary

    Miss Chandni Nigam · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Miss Chandni Nigam, a 19-year-old woman with a history of depression and suicidal ideation, died after being struck by a train at Twyford Railway Station on 4 February 2014. The report raised concern that the NHS Mental Health Team did not obtain relevant history or input from her previous private clinicians when care transferred to the NHS.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to obtain relevant history and treatment input from private clinicians

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) During the course of her on-going care, Miss Nigam was being seen by private psychiatrist and psychologist. When she reverted to NHS Mental Health Team Care she still had on-going sessions with the private psychologist. There was an opportunity to gain history and input from the private clinicians as to Miss Nigam’s history, previous treatment and what had been successful and less successful. No attempt to obtain that history or any input from the previous private clinicians appears to have been made. There was an opportunity to obtain helpful and effective historical information that may have assisted in the treatment of Miss Nigam by the Mental Health Team. ”

    Source location

    Miss Chandni Nigam · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026