Recurring concern

Unreliable handover of care information and responsibility

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 17 Jan 2014•Latest report 26 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in the dedicated handover process for care information or responsibility, including absent or unclear procedures, incomplete or unauditable handover records, failure to transfer relevant information, and unclear or uncompleted handovers between care staff, managers, coordinators or successor services.

Not included

  • Excludes clinical handovers between healthcare professionals where the existing clinical-handover concern is the more specific supported boundary.
  • Excludes failures of discharge, inter-service transfer or general continuity processes where no care-handover deficiency is identified.
  • Excludes generic communication, staffing, documentation or training deficiencies unless they directly impair the transfer of care information or responsibility during handover.
  • Excludes non-care operational handovers, such as fire-and-rescue incident roles or general workplace shifts, unless the assertion concerns transfer of responsibility for care.
Reports
45

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
48

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
77

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care3
Care Quality Commission2
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust2
Herefordshire and Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust2
HM Prison and Probation Service2
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence2
Son of the deceased2
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust2
Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust2
Arden Court1
Bank Close House1
Barts Health NHS Trust1
Bedford Prison1
Belle Green Court1
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Edith Theresa PYE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Edith Theresa PYE sustained a fracture after rolling from her bed at Chandler Court Care Home on 29 March 2024 while receiving personal care from one carer instead of the required two. She underwent an above-knee amputation, developed a chest infection and pulmonary emboli, and died at the care home on 28 April 2024. Concerns included ambiguous care-plan and handover information, inadequate staff awareness and compliance, lack of auditing, and weaknesses in the internal investigation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of handover documents to communicate required personal-care staffing arrangements

    Wider context from the report

    “3) At the inquest, I was shown a handover document which had been drafted by the home’s Deputy Manager, and was told that a nurse in charge would have gone through this document with all carers at the beginning of the relevant shift. The document was meant to highlight each resident’s care needs, based on their respective care plans. It did not make clear that Mrs. Pye required two carers for the provision of personal care, or that at least one of those carers should be female; ”

    Source location

    Edith Theresa PYE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce key workers, alongside shift leads, to maintain knowledge of residents’ care needs and disseminate key information to teams.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Additionally, Chandler Court now involves key workers who, along with the shift leads, are responsible for having a sound knowledge of the residents’ care needs and disseminating key information to their teams.”

    Source location

    2024-0706 - Response from Care UK Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 December 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review handover templates so they highlight key aspects of each resident’s care needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Care UK has reviewed our handover templates to ensure that they highlight the key aspects of each resident’s care needs.”

    Source location

    2024-0706 - Response from Care UK Ltd
    Page 3 · response
    Published 27 December 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review handover sheets weekly and update them when residents’ care needs change, under management supervision.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At Chandler Court, handover sheets are now reviewed by the Deputy Manager at the weekly clinical review meetings to ensure accuracy. In addition, any changes to a resident’s care needs are reported during the daily morning meetings and the person in charge of the suite, which would either be the Team Leader and/or Registered Nurse, is directed to complete the relevant update under the supervision of either the Deputy Manager or the Home Manager.”

    Source location

    2024-0706 - Response from Care UK Ltd
    Page 3 · response
    Published 27 December 2024

    Open published response
  2. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Anna Vivien Elliott · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Anna Vivien Elliott, who had severe recurrent depression with psychotic features and autism spectrum disorder, was detained under the Mental Health Act after having thoughts and plans to end her life. She was found deceased in her room on 24 November 2021 after safe and supportive observations were missed and her safety plan was ended without an adequate risk assessment. Concerns included inadequate handover and staffing, missed and falsified observation records, poor record keeping, and uncertainty about the management of safety plans.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of written handover records to capture vital information

    Wider context from the report

    “Concern 1 There were issues with record keeping across the board. Including, a telephone call from Anna’s mother reporting concerning messages was not recorded or passed on; an entry relating to a different patient was recorded in Anna’s records; staff were sharing log on details or not logging off from their account (also raising data protection concerns); and the written handover document was inadequate, failing to record vital information. ”

    Source location

    Anna Vivien Elliott · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and roll out a standardised 24-hour handover template with daily and quarterly audits.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “13. Tower Hamlets is currently working on creating a standardised handover template. This project is being led by the Deputy Borough Lead Nurse. The aim is to have a running document over a 24-hour period. The handover template has been tested on some of the wards and is currently being rolled out to the remaining wards. Roll out should be completed by the end of September 2024. The Matron responsible for ward will be responsible for the initial audit daily, this will be audited by the Lead Nurses quarterly.”

    Source location

    Response from ELFT
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue using Safety Huddles and document discussions on the handover template.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “14. In addition, the Trust will continue to use Safety Huddles as a way of discussion and decision making during a shift. Safety Huddle discussions will be documented on the handover template. This will ensure vital information during a shift is captured in the handover documentation.”

    Source location

    Response from ELFT
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response
  3. Dorset

    AI-generated summary

    Frazer Charlie Williams · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Frazer Charlie Williams was found deceased on 7 March 2022 in his cell at HMP Guys Marsh, suspended by a ligature. The report identifies concerns about delays transferring prisoners requiring mental health hospital care, inadequate arrangements for managing self-neglect and healthcare handovers, shortcomings in ACCT monitoring and reviews, and other prison care and safety processes. The inquest concluded that he died by suicide in circumstances where there was inadequate assessment and monitoring of his risks of self-harm and suicide prior to his death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of national guidance for healthcare handover to receiving prisons

    Wider context from the report

    “iv. There is a lack of national guidance for healthcare teams working in prisons around the handover of healthcare of a prisoner to the receiving prison when they are transferred to another prison. ”

    Source location

    Frazer Charlie Williams · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 6 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Other report recipients are responsible for addressing prison healthcare guidance, ACCT operations and family engagement because these concern day-to-day prison operations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “With regard to the other concerns you have raised around a lack of national guidance relating to a range of healthcare issues in prison settings; operational issues regarding the ACCT process and engagement with prisoners’ family members, I would expect the other recipients of your report to address these in their responses, as they are responsible for matters relating to day to day operations within prison settings. I look forward to seeing their responses and working with them where appropriate, to avoid a repetition of the horrific events of this case.”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 June 2024

    Open published response
  4. Derby and Derbyshire

    AI-generated summary

    Miriam STONE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Miriam Stone died on 20 February 2022 after being found with a ligature around her neck in a mental health unit on 18 February, following admission after an overdose. The concerns included uncertainty over responsibility for admission tasks during staff handover, a lack of formal policy protecting handover time, inadequate or incomplete risk and safety assessments, and observations that were not individually assessed and were found likely inappropriate.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to clearly allocate responsibility for admission tasks during staff handover

    Wider context from the report

    “Miriam was admitted to the mental health unit at approximately 8.30pm. The unit has a staff handover between 9.00pm and 9.30pm. The evidence at inquest was contradictory as to which shift had assumed responsibility for completing admission tasks including risk assessments and care / safety plans. It was recognised that admission shortly before or during shift handover can increase risks relating to the quality of information sharing and the allocation of admission tasks such as assessing the level of observations required. The court heard evidence that whilst efforts would be made to avoid admission during staff handover time this was a local practice rather than part of any formal policy. The court further heard evidence that senior staff considered that avoidance of admission at handover times would be difficult to achieve because there were too many different organisations who might be requesting admission. This appeared to overlook the fact that it is the bed allocation team based at the trust who are the central point of contact. The current operational policy covering admission procedures (Acute Inpatient Operational Policy) does not mention a need for handover time to be protected, avoiding admission during this time. Without a formal policy on this topic there is a risk that future deaths could occur. ”

    Source location

    Miriam STONE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    KATHARINE ANNE FOX · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Katharine Fox died by hanging in October 2022 after being discharged from hospital, having been unable to access community psychology services during the following months. Concerns related to the lack of handover and continuity between hospital and community psychology services, substantial waiting times, and possible inability of clinicians to access notes held on different computer systems.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide continuity and handover between hospital and community psychology services

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) I am concerned that the disconnection between the provision of psychology services to patients in hospital and the provision of similar psychology services to patients in the community, including the fact that the community psychology service does not receive any form of handover and that there is a substantial wait for the provision of psychology sessions which may well require continuity to be delivered effectively. ”

    Source location

    KATHARINE ANNE FOX · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide formal handovers from inpatient psychologists to community psychological practitioners and coordinate follow-on care with community mental health teams.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Every patient who is receiving psychological intervention on an inpatient unit and is in need of continued psychological intervention post discharge, will have a handover of care from the inpatient psychologist (verbal/in writing) to the Community Team psychological practitioner. The Community Team psychological practitioner will discuss the care and treatment with the community mental health team to ensure the patient receives appropriate care and support in the community. The care in the community can be provided by the psychological practitioner or other appropriate team member under the supervision of a qualified registered psychological practitioner.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 December 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Regularly audit handovers to verify safe transfer of psychological care to community teams.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The process of handover will be regularly audited to ensure that the care is safely transferred to the Community Team.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 December 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the operational model for transitions and handovers between inpatient and community psychological services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Further, the Unit is currently reviewing the operational model to improve the transition and handover of care between inpatient and community psychological services, with the aim of streamlining this provision.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 December 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce locality-based joint inpatient-community consultations, formal pre-discharge handovers, and electronic recording of handover information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The new process will include a joint consultation between the inpatient and community psychological services in order to aid care planning and formal handover of appropriate inpatient cases prior to discharge across each locality in Essex. Handover will be recorded on the patient’s electronic notes.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 December 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Embed a clinical information-sharing mechanism through a joint forum incorporating formal handover of required inpatient and community information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Further, the Court is advised that it is commissioning a unified Electronic Medical Records System, in the interim Psychological Services will now have access to all of the required clinical systems and will also embed a new mechanism to ensure robust clinical information sharing between inpatient and community clinicians. This will be achieved through the aforementioned joint forum which will incorporate a formal handover of all required information. Should access to more detailed clinical information be required, this can be requested.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 December 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Patients do not always require immediate ongoing psychological therapy after discharge; treatment urgency should be determined by clinical need.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst it is noted that patients do not always require immediate on-going psychological therapy upon discharge from hospital, Psychological Services will, going forward, embed a mechanism for clinical prioritisation in order to ensure that the most urgent cases are appropriately identified and prioritised in the community, ensuring continuity of psychological treatment and minimising waiting times as much as is practicably possible. This will be monitored through the waiting time data that is collected by each service team, and which is reported through our Trust Accountability Framework process.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 December 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Relevant clinical records are accessible to inpatient and community psychological staff through existing electronic systems and the Health Information Exchange.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Court is respectfully advised that EPUT (like a number of NHS Trusts) uses multiple Electronic Medical Records Systems, which includes PARIS and MOBIUS. Staff within the Inpatient Psychological Services team have access to both systems, as well as Health Information Exchange (HIE) and can therefore access all records/reports. Our IT department has recently confirmed that all clinical staff in Adult Community Psychological Services can also access both systems.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 December 2023

    Open published response
  6. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Anthony John Friend · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Anthony John Friend, who was living with the effects of a brain tumour and required regular personal care, sustained a significant head injury on 17 April 2023 after slipping through a sling while being hoisted from a chair to his bed. He was discharged home for palliative care and died there on 20 April 2023. The principal concern was that an old toileting sling had previously been judged unsuitable and unsafe, but remained at his property and continued to be used, with shortcomings identified in communication, supervision and arrangements for safer alternatives.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure by outgoing care providers to contact incoming care providers and provide handovers about care needs and safety concerns

    Wider context from the report

    “In the course of the inquest, I heard evidence that: 1) Bluebird Care provided care at home for Mr. Friend up to 16.4.23 ( two days before the accident which led to Mr. Friend’s death ); 2) the reason Bluebird Care stopped providing care for Mr. Friend was that they had concerns about the sling which was still being used with his hoist; 3) Bluebird Care knew by 12.4.23 that Mr. Friend’s care at home after 16.4.23 would be provided by Divine Health Services Ltd.; 4) At no time did Bluebird Care try to make contact with, or provide any sort of handover to Divine Health Services Ltd. about Mr. Friend’s needs, or about any concerns they had concerning the sling. In her evidence to the inquest, ████████, Bluebird Care’s registered care manager, agreed that it was “common sense...for there to be a good handover between care agencies”, but that it “was not something which we had ever done”; 5) At no time did Divine Health Services Ltd. make any efforts to identify, contact or seek a handover about Mr. Friend from the previous care agency Bluebird Care. In his evidence to the inquest, ████████, Director of Divine Health Services Ltd., agreed that it would be “a matter of good practice” to have done so. ”

    Source location

    Anthony John Friend · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure by incoming care providers to identify previous care providers and seek a handover

    Wider context from the report

    “In the course of the inquest, I heard evidence that: 1) Bluebird Care provided care at home for Mr. Friend up to 16.4.23 ( two days before the accident which led to Mr. Friend’s death ); 2) the reason Bluebird Care stopped providing care for Mr. Friend was that they had concerns about the sling which was still being used with his hoist; 3) Bluebird Care knew by 12.4.23 that Mr. Friend’s care at home after 16.4.23 would be provided by Divine Health Services Ltd.; 4) At no time did Bluebird Care try to make contact with, or provide any sort of handover to Divine Health Services Ltd. about Mr. Friend’s needs, or about any concerns they had concerning the sling. In her evidence to the inquest, ████████, Bluebird Care’s registered care manager, agreed that it was “common sense...for there to be a good handover between care agencies”, but that it “was not something which we had ever done”; 5) At no time did Divine Health Services Ltd. make any efforts to identify, contact or seek a handover about Mr. Friend from the previous care agency Bluebird Care. In his evidence to the inquest, ████████, Director of Divine Health Services Ltd., agreed that it would be “a matter of good practice” to have done so. ”

    Source location

    Anthony John Friend · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide handovers between care agencies about care needs and safety concerns

    Wider context from the report

    “In the course of the inquest, I heard evidence that: 1) Bluebird Care provided care at home for Mr. Friend up to 16.4.23 ( two days before the accident which led to Mr. Friend’s death ); 2) the reason Bluebird Care stopped providing care for Mr. Friend was that they had concerns about the sling which was still being used with his hoist; 3) Bluebird Care knew by 12.4.23 that Mr. Friend’s care at home after 16.4.23 would be provided by Divine Health Services Ltd.; 4) At no time did Bluebird Care try to make contact with, or provide any sort of handover to Divine Health Services Ltd. about Mr. Friend’s needs, or about any concerns they had concerning the sling. In her evidence to the inquest, ████████, Bluebird Care’s registered care manager, agreed that it was “common sense...for there to be a good handover between care agencies”, but that it “was not something which we had ever done”. ”

    Source location

    Anthony John Friend · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Write to Herefordshire and Worcestershire CHC to seek clarification on handover protocols and establish best-practice standards for potential improvements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst, as above, we do consider that in this case the handover process captured all the relevant information we had to share with the new provider, in an effort to improve this process going forward we have written to Herefordshire and Worcestershire CHC to seek guidance and clarification on the existing handover protocol for care providers when either taking on, or serving notice on, a package of care from CHC, as well as establishing best practice standards to implement any possible improvements. We are dedicated to continuing to be a high-quality care provider, and although the circumstances are unfortunate, we want to take this opportunity to work in partnership with other health care professionals to provide the best care and support to all those that we support.”

    Source location

    Response from Bluebird Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 18 September 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Follow the enhanced handover process for all customers transitioning to or from Bluebird Care, not only CHC-funded customers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “From our perspective, this process will not be limited to handovers concerning CHC funded patients and will be followed for all customers that are transitioning to or from our care.”

    Source location

    Response from Bluebird Care
    Page 4 · response
    Published 18 September 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce a countywide communication-focused role supporting joint client visits, delegated tasks, and liaison between HASE and external care agencies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have also introduced a new role into our countywide service, this role has a significant bias towards improving communication with our external agencies to prevent occurrences like this happening again. They will be involved in joint visits to clients and will have weekly clinical supervision, where tasks will be delegated to them to support improved communication between HASE and other agencies.”

    Source location

    Response from Herefordshire and Worcestershire Health and Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 18 September 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Proactively seek opportunities to observe care calls when taking over packages, where circumstances require, to support assessment and handover.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. We would also value the opportunity, should it be required, to observe a care call being carried out by an outgoing provider if we were to take over a package of care. We have proactively sought out these opportunities ourselves and have found them beneficial when circumstances require this, for example visiting a customer in hospital to make observations prior to returning home, and visiting another customer at home who had an existing homecare provider visiting daily.”

    Source location

    Response from Bluebird Care
    Page 4 · response
    Published 18 September 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The existing CHC-mediated handover captured all relevant information, including sling concerns, so direct outgoing-to-incoming contact was not necessary in this case.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of this meeting, the management team reviewed the detailed care plan that had been prepared by CHC based on information provided by ourselves and provided to Divine Health Care as part of the process of finding a new care provider. Although the handover was from CHC to Divine Health Care and not directly from Bluebird Care to Divine Health Care, all of Bluebird Care’s concerns regarding the sling were very clearly documented within this detailed 14-page document. Our identity as the outgoing care provider was also included within this document. This document was shared with Divine Health Care in advance of them carrying out their assessment and agreeing to take over Mr Friend's package of care.”

    Source location

    Response from Bluebird Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 September 2023

    Open published response
  7. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Johanne Blackwood · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Johanne Blackwood, known as Jo, died by suicide on 12 June 2021 after placing herself in the path of a train. The report identified concerns about unclear Care Coordinator handovers and responsibility for oversight after discharge, the absence of an allocated Care Coordinator for several weeks, failure to update her risk assessment, care plan and security plan, and inappropriate over-reliance on family members to keep her safe.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clarity in formal handovers of Care Coordinator responsibility

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Evidence confirmed a conspicuous lack of clarity as to when, where and by (or between) whom any formal handover of responsibility as Care Coordinator (CC) for Jo took place as between a number of CCs allocated to Jo over a period of many months from the lead up to and following her discharge as an in-patient back to the community team on December 18ᵗʰ 2020 and through to early May 2021. ”

    Source location

    Johanne Blackwood · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a formal policy or procedure requiring recording of Care Coordinator handovers

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Consequently , the evidence confirmed, despite her clear vulnerabilities, Jo did not have an allocated Care Coordinator for several weeks up to the beginning of May 2021. The evidence also confirmed that the lack of clarity as to the timing and conduct of CC handovers and the absence of an allocated CC to work with Jo (and by extension, her family) was informed by lack of a formal policy or procedure requiring that a full, detailed, formal record of handover between Care Coordinators is to be placed on EPUT electronic records. ”

    Source location

    Johanne Blackwood · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement and use a Trust-wide electronic Care Coordinator to Care Coordinator Transfer of Care Document for structured handovers and continuity oversight.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of the Inquest hearing, it was recommended by yourself, as the presiding Coroner, that the operational management at Essex Partnership University Foundation Trust (EPUT) consider establishing a mechanism and process for a formal structured handover between care coordinators. The service manager took this recommendation on board and has been working with colleagues and departments to produce a purposeful template that will form part of the Patient Electronic Record specific to the care coordinators’ handover. This document has been approved, for implementation Trust wide, following a process of consultation and with comments gathered from all community services.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Fondation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Attempt prompt recruitment and arrange at least two weeks’ overlap when a care coordinator gives notice, supporting effective handover and continuity of care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, where notice has been given by any care coordinator (of their departure from the Trust) the team will promptly make an attempt to recruit another member of staff with an aim of ensuring an overlap of at least two weeks, to allow for effective handover and continuity of care, again Trust wide.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Fondation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 July 2023

    Open published response
  8. South Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    June Peel · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    June Peel, a resident at Belle Green Court Care Home, sustained a displaced distal femur fracture that was not identified or medically assessed promptly. She underwent surgery after admission to hospital and did not recover, dying on a palliative care pathway. The principal concerns were failures to follow her care plan, record and hand over information about her knee injury, and seek timely medical attention.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to pass injury information on at handover or document its transfer

    Wider context from the report

    “1. There was a failure to record the injury from the body map in the daily communication records both on 3rd June and 6th June, and a failure to pass that information on at handover (or to document that the information had been passed on). This led to a period in which June was being turned on a 2 hourly basis with a displaced femur fracture. ”

    Source location

    June Peel · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen staff communication by requiring documented concerns, daily records, written handovers, shift briefings and review of relevant resident records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Action Taken We have taken the following action to ensure information is effectively communicated across the team;”

    Source location

    Response from Belle Green Court Care Home
    Page 9 · response
    Published 4 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require the Manager to review and sign off handover records daily for completeness and inclusion of key information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “6. The Manager reviews the handover record every day to ensure that the records are robust and key information is included. The Manager signs off the report to evidence that it has been reviewed.”

    Source location

    Response from Belle Green Court Care Home
    Page 9 · response
    Published 4 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a Referral for Medical Attention policy requiring prompt clinical referral, documented professional guidance, care-plan updates and recorded follow-up.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Action Taken We have implemented a new policy ‘Referral for Medical Attention’. Staff must not exercise their judgement as to whether urgent referral/ treatment is required or whether assessment can be delayed. The policy requires that”

    Source location

    Response from Belle Green Court Care Home
    Page 10 · response
    Published 4 August 2025

    Open published response
  9. West Yorkshire Eastern

    AI-generated summary

    Mark Anthony Athias · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mark Anthony Athias had multiple physical and mental health issues, including recurring urinary infections and problems with a long-term catheter. After difficulties with his catheter on 2 July 2021, he was admitted to hospital, where his condition deteriorated and he died on 6 July 2021. Concerns included a lack of sterile replacement catheters, inadequate monitoring records, and a missing handover record, with risks arising from deficient record keeping.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to preserve handover records

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The handover record for 2 July 2021 was missing, having allegedly been overwritten. The managers in the nursing home did not appreciate this until an Adult Safeguarding Investigation was underway. ”

    Source location

    Mark Anthony Athias · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Preserve handover records through electronic monthly files, printed management-office copies, archiving and monthly completeness checks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “You heard evidence from Ms ████████ that Exemplar Health Care had changed its system to use word templates across the entire organisation. It is therefore no longer possible for documents such as handovers to be overwritten. In addition, each handover is now saved electronically in a specific month document file and a copy is printed off and retained in the management office at Copperfields in paper form with a date tracker.”

    Source location

    2022-0024-Response-from-Exemplar-Health-Care_Published
    Page 4 · response
    Published 31 January 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Electronic storage, printed copies and monthly checks ensure handovers cannot be overwritten and remain accessible.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “You heard evidence from Ms ████████ that Exemplar Health Care had changed its system to use word templates across the entire organisation. It is therefore no longer possible for documents such as handovers to be overwritten. In addition, each handover is now saved electronically in a specific month document file and a copy is printed off and retained in the management office at Copperfields in paper form with a date tracker.”

    Source location

    2022-0024-Response-from-Exemplar-Health-Care_Published
    Page 4 · response
    Published 31 January 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing management oversight, quality assurance and governance processes are considered sufficient to ensure records are kept, retained and reviewed for trends.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I have detailed above the relevant management structure changes and quality assurance systems in place to ensure that all record keeping is appropriate and accurate. In summary:”

    Source location

    2022-0024-Response-from-Exemplar-Health-Care_Published
    Page 4 · response
    Published 31 January 2022

    Open published response
  10. Mid Kent and Medway

    AI-generated summary

    Caden Stewart · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Caden Stewart, aged 16, became unwell after weightlifting in custody and was later found collapsed and unresponsive in his cell. He was diagnosed with a brain haemorrhage, underwent surgery, and died at King’s College Hospital. The principal concerns were inadequate reporting and recording procedures and insufficient communication between prison officers and healthcare staff, resulting in healthcare failing to attend his requests to be seen.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate healthcare waiting status during handover

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The wing officer in charge did not check whether Caden had been seen by healthcare at any stage over the following hours nor did he inform his successor on handover that Caden was waiting to see healthcare and had not been seen ”

    Source location

    Caden Stewart · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use daily residential roll books, guidance prompts and NOMIS records to capture healthcare requests, follow-up actions and relevant wellbeing information for staff sharing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To ensure improved and effective information sharing regarding a prisoner’s well-being, in September 2021 the Young People Services Team introduced daily roll books onto the residential areas which record the amount of time each young person spends in various activities. The logs provide for comments to be added and ‘guidance prompts’ are now in place which outline the importance of providing this information so that it is available to all staff. The guidance prompts also explain the type of information staff should record, including where a young person has made a request to see healthcare. A Notice to Staff detailing the use of the roll books was issued to ensure all staff are aware of the need to record information about a young person in custody.”

    Source location

    2021-0328-Response-from-HMPPS_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 October 2021

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026