Recurring concern

Unreliable handover of care information and responsibility

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 17 Jan 2014•Latest report 26 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in the dedicated handover process for care information or responsibility, including absent or unclear procedures, incomplete or unauditable handover records, failure to transfer relevant information, and unclear or uncompleted handovers between care staff, managers, coordinators or successor services.

Not included

  • Excludes clinical handovers between healthcare professionals where the existing clinical-handover concern is the more specific supported boundary.
  • Excludes failures of discharge, inter-service transfer or general continuity processes where no care-handover deficiency is identified.
  • Excludes generic communication, staffing, documentation or training deficiencies unless they directly impair the transfer of care information or responsibility during handover.
  • Excludes non-care operational handovers, such as fire-and-rescue incident roles or general workplace shifts, unless the assertion concerns transfer of responsibility for care.
Reports
45

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
48

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
77

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care3
Care Quality Commission2
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust2
Herefordshire and Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust2
HM Prison and Probation Service2
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence2
Son of the deceased2
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust2
Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust2
Arden Court1
Bank Close House1
Barts Health NHS Trust1
Bedford Prison1
Belle Green Court1
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Plymouth, Torbay and South Devon

    AI-generated summary

    Audrey Christine DAWS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Audrey Christine Daws was admitted to Derriford Hospital with chest pain and other symptoms, but her chest X-ray was delayed and its result was not identified promptly. The X-ray eventually showed air under the diaphragm indicating a perforation; she underwent surgery, deteriorated and died. The principal concerns were inadequate handover of outstanding investigations and delays in ordering, performing and reviewing the X-ray.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to hand over outstanding investigations and required result checks during staff shift changes

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Handover of Information. The need for Mrs Daws to undergo a chest X-ray and for the result to be checked appears to have been lost as medical staff have changed at the end/start of consecutive shifts. You may wish to consider whether there needs to be a formal handover in respect of every patient where outstanding investigations are highlighted. ”

    Source location

    Audrey Christine DAWS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use ward patient plans and boards to track investigations, tests and urgent treatment, with daily nursing and medical review.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Each ward has a plan for every patient (this involves a whiteboard with a clear plan of daily investigations together with the tests ordered and expected for each patient, which can be tracked by nursing and medical staff). A second board, which includes tests or treatment which are urgent for the on-call doctors is evident by the nurses station. The plans for each patient are discussed on a daily basis with nursing and medical staff.”

    Source location

    2014-0318-Plymouth-Hospital-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 9 July 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require review of outstanding tests and verbal and written handover before transferring MAU patients to wards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• There is a full handover of every patient on the MAU with outstanding tests – no patient is transferred until all tests have been reviewed and there has been a verbal and written handover to the receiving team on the ward.”

    Source location

    2014-0318-Plymouth-Hospital-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 July 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct formal handovers for every on-call team to transfer information and identify outstanding tests and concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• There are now formal shift handovers for every on-call team, both within the week and weekend, which manage the transfer of information between shifts and identify outstanding tests and cases of concern.”

    Source location

    2014-0318-Plymouth-Hospital-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 July 2014

    Open published response
  2. North East Kent

    AI-generated summary

    Winifred Olive DENNIS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Winifred Olive DENNIS died at home on 27 December 2012 after a deterioration in health leading to reduced and ultimately no mobility. She had developed a deep sacral pressure sore, and the inquest recorded bronchopneumonia and the pressure sore as the clinical causes of death. The report identified a concern that information about her previous airflow mattress was not formally handed over when she moved between care settings, potentially reducing the provision of optimum care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of formal handover and transfer of important information between community nursing teams

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The evidence was that within Kent Community Health NHS Trust the community nurses are organised into teams dependent upon the GP surgeries that they are covering. As a result, the moving of a patient from her own home to a Care Home, or between Care Homes, can cause her to be transferred from one Community Nursing Team to another, occurred in this instance. Although from the patient's notes would be transfer, the Trust had no formal handover document as such for a patient in these circumstances, and in this instance, the information that at her previous Home she had had the benefit of an airflow mattress was not communicated to the next Home on her move there. Care Homes look to the community nurses for such guidance. (2) In other cases, similar important information not directly of a clinical nature might not be transferred and the chances of optimum care being delivered to a patient might accordingly be reduced. ”

    Source location

    Winifred Olive DENNIS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a formal process for transferring care between community nursing teams.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Response A formal process to enable the transfer of care between community nursing teams has been devised. A working group has been established to revise the policies and procedures and monitor through clinical audit all aspects of transfer of care. Work is already underway to improve the documentation associated with transfer to ensure all patients have a full holistic reassessment prior to transfer that clearly documents the patients care needs handed over to the teams responsible for implementing the on-going care. This process ensures continuity of care. Patients’ on-going needs are clearly identified and communicated effectively upon transfer between community nursing teams. The training available to staff for holistic assessment and care planning has been revised and the new programme is now being rolled out.”

    Source location

    2014-0167-Response-by-Kent-Community-Health-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 April 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise transfer-of-care policies and procedures through an established working group.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Response A formal process to enable the transfer of care between community nursing teams has been devised. A working group has been established to revise the policies and procedures and monitor through clinical audit all aspects of transfer of care. Work is already underway to improve the documentation associated with transfer to ensure all patients have a full holistic reassessment prior to transfer that clearly documents the patients care needs handed over to the teams responsible for implementing the on-going care. This process ensures continuity of care. Patients’ on-going needs are clearly identified and communicated effectively upon transfer between community nursing teams. The training available to staff for holistic assessment and care planning has been revised and the new programme is now being rolled out.”

    Source location

    2014-0167-Response-by-Kent-Community-Health-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 April 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Improve transfer documentation so patients receive holistic reassessment and clearly documented care needs before transfer.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Response A formal process to enable the transfer of care between community nursing teams has been devised. A working group has been established to revise the policies and procedures and monitor through clinical audit all aspects of transfer of care. Work is already underway to improve the documentation associated with transfer to ensure all patients have a full holistic reassessment prior to transfer that clearly documents the patients care needs handed over to the teams responsible for implementing the on-going care. This process ensures continuity of care. Patients’ on-going needs are clearly identified and communicated effectively upon transfer between community nursing teams. The training available to staff for holistic assessment and care planning has been revised and the new programme is now being rolled out.”

    Source location

    2014-0167-Response-by-Kent-Community-Health-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 April 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor transfer-of-care arrangements through clinical audit and Trust committee structures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Response A formal process to enable the transfer of care between community nursing teams has been devised. A working group has been established to revise the policies and procedures and monitor through clinical audit all aspects of transfer of care. Work is already underway to improve the documentation associated with transfer to ensure all patients have a full holistic reassessment prior to transfer that clearly documents the patients care needs handed over to the teams responsible for implementing the on-going care. This process ensures continuity of care. Patients’ on-going needs are clearly identified and communicated effectively upon transfer between community nursing teams. The training available to staff for holistic assessment and care planning has been revised and the new programme is now being rolled out.”

    Source location

    2014-0167-Response-by-Kent-Community-Health-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 April 2014

    Open published response
  3. Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    DANUTA Bronislawa CORBETT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Danuta Bronislawa Corbett jumped from the window of her eighth-floor flat during escorted leave on 4 November 2013 and died. The report raises concerns that decisions about her leave were not documented in accordance with policy and that the agency escort was not given important information about her distress, her home, or her stated threat to kill herself by jumping from it.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to hand over relevant patient and suicide-risk information to the leave escort

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The report concerns the leave policy so far as it relates to Informal Patients. (Copy enclosed – refer to S. 4.5 and then S. 43). (2) Leave was considered first on 1.11.2013 when Mrs. Corbett was on 15 minute observations. The Ward Review documents that she wants leave to go to her home to collect some papers over the next 2 – 3 days- Escorted leave agreed. No Leave occurred on 1st, 2nd or 3rd November, 2013 but no reason for this is documented. On the 4th she has another Ward Review. She remained on 15 minute observations. As to leave, none of the matters referred to in the Policy at S.4.3 are documented in the Progress Note or in the Clinical Review or in the Electronic Note of the ward review on 4th November. In the afternoon of 4th November, Mrs. Corbett repeated her request to the Charge Nurse to go home. She was apparently Risk Assessed again and an escort was allocated. The escort was an agency health care worker who had never met the patient and had never worked on this ward before. No note by the risk assessment, or the decision to allow escorted leave was made in accordance with S.4.3 of the Policy. The patient’s details and details of the reasons for her admission were not handed over to the escort, in particular neither the fact that her flat/home was central to her distress or the fact that she had threatened to kill herself by jumping from it were known to the escort. Thus none of the decisions regarding her Leave on the 4th November are documented. This patient jumped out of her 8th floor flat window at home during this escorted leave. ”

    Source location

    DANUTA Bronislawa CORBETT · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ensure proper handovers with agency nurses accompanying patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Finally, it is clear that the communication with the agency nurse who was accompanying Danuta should have been much better. The nurse responsible acknowledges this and will always ensure proper handovers take place in the future.”

    Source location

    2014-0150-Response-by-Sussex-Partnership-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 April 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The shortcomings identified were unlikely to have prevented the tragic outcome.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It seems unlikely that any of the shortcomings highlighted by this very sad case would have prevented the tragic outcome. However, all the staff involved in Danuta’s care have carefully reflected on what happened and used the learning to improve their practice.”

    Source location

    2014-0150-Response-by-Sussex-Partnership-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 April 2014

    Open published response
  4. West Sussex

    AI-generated summary

    Natasha Raghoo · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Natasha Raghoo was admitted to The Dene Hospital in April 2012 for treatment related to bipolar disorder and was later detained under section 2 of the Mental Health Act. She was found unresponsive in bed on 5 May 2012 and died from anaphylactic shock caused by an unknown allergen. Concerns included inconsistent physical observations, lack of ECG assessment, staff training in resuscitation and defibrillator use, and communication and handover problems.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Poor-quality staff handovers

    Wider context from the report

    “9. The policy on length of time staff are expected to conduct observations, and the quality of handover from one member of staff to another. ”

    Source location

    Natasha Raghoo · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and standardise handover procedures using signed formal handover documents with a physical-health section.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Lessons Learned and changes made”

    Source location

    2014-0100-Response-by-Partnership-in-Care
    Page 4 · response
    Published 6 March 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review, revise and reissue the observation policy, brief relevant staff, obtain responsibility acknowledgements, and audit implementation with spot checks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Lessons Learned and changes made”

    Source location

    2014-0100-Response-by-Partnership-in-Care
    Page 6 · response
    Published 6 March 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The handover concern did not apply on the relevant shift because staff attended handover and the late-arriving worker received a separate handover.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All staff, regardless of their employment status, attend the nursing handover. On the shift in question, there were no agency staff.”

    Source location

    2014-0100-Response-by-Partnership-in-Care
    Page 4 · response
    Published 6 March 2014

    Open published response
  5. Cornwall

    AI-generated summary

    JULIA SHEEREN DELL · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Julia Sheeren Dell, aged 45, took her own life after jumping from cliffs at Duckpool Beach and died of multiple injuries. The report identified concerns about limited primary-care contact after 4 April 2012, no formal handover between doctors, and no apparent action on a care plan received from the Community Mental Health Team.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of formal handover when primary care responsibility changed

    Wider context from the report

    “I was told that on 4 April 2012 Mrs Dell decided to change GP within the practice and her care then passed to ███████ and ███████ who job share. In the period from 4 April until Mrs Dell’s death on 22 August there was only one further contact with primary care. At inquest, ███████ conceded that: “it would have been nice for there to have been more involvement from primary care after 4 April 2012”. He indicated also that the surgery was unaware of Mrs Dell’s fluctuating mood from April until her death. (1) There appears to have been no formal hand over between ████████ to ████████ in early April 2012. (2) On 19 April 2012 a care plan was received from the Community Mental Health Team following Mrs Dell’s discharge from their care back to primary care. No action seems to have been taken upon its receipt. It appears as though the doctors have accepted the reassurance of the CPN that Mrs Dell’s moods had stabilised on the medication prescribed to her notwithstanding the fact that only three weeks previously on 22 March 2012 ████████ had contacted ████████ to express his concerns over Mrs Dell’s wellbeing ”

    Source location

    JULIA SHEEREN DELL · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026