Recurring concern

Unreliable care-planning processes

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 1 Aug 2013•Latest report 2 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes missing, incomplete, unclear, outdated, uncoordinated, unreviewed or unimplemented formal person-level care plans and established named equivalents such as integrated care or care-and-crisis plans.

Not included

  • Excludes standalone procedural instructions, treatment steps, extubation plans and immediate deterioration-management plans unless the source explicitly identifies them as part of the person's formal care plan.
  • Excludes organisational improvement plans, staffing plans and operational contingency plans.
  • Excludes discharge planning, risk assessment, family involvement or generic records when that separate control is the concern and formal care-plan reliability is not directly asserted.
Reports
120

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
141

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
200

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care14
Care Quality Commission9
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust9
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust7
NHS England7
Ministry of Justice5
Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust4
Barts Health NHS Trust4
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust4
North East London NHS Foundation Trust4
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust3
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust3
Hc-One Limited3
HM Prison and Probation Service3
Office of the Chief Coroner3

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Bethany Tengquist · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Bethany Tengquist hanged herself on 29 December 2018 after two telephone charging cables had been removed from her room but her dressing gown cord remained available. The report raises concerns that room checks and the removal of dangerous items were incomplete and flawed, and that staff may not have been properly trained.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to meaningfully update care plans

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Care Plan not Up-dated. It was accepted by the Trust that Beth’s Care Plan had not, contrary to requirements of the Care Programme Arrangement, been updated in any meaningful way throughout Beth’s three month section 3 detention prior to her death. As the Clinical Lead Nurse Manager conceded, in the absence of patient centred involvement in the up-dating of the Care Plan, it risks becoming “meaningless” to the patient. In circumstances where a co-authored and co-produced document that actively involves and engages the patient is simply not up-dated meaningfully at all, then the aims and purposes of the CPA risk being undermined. In the context of a patient with Beth’s co-morbidities, the impact may be very serious indeed. The jury’s conclusions in this respect are informative and clear. ”

    Source location

    Bethany Tengquist · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 5 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

    AI-generated summary

    EMILY DAISY SIMS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Emily Daisy Sims, a 101-year-old care home resident, died after bilateral spiral fractures to both femurs sustained when she was held by the ankles and swung out of bed. The report identified concerns about care plans not being updated to reflect changing needs, inadequate equipment and specialist advice, and insufficient training in equipment use and moving and handling.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of updating care plans with meetings and decisions about changing needs

    Wider context from the report

    “2)    The lack of updating of care plans to include reference to multi-disciplinary meetings or care needs meetings and decisions taken to manage changing needs ”

    Source location

    EMILY DAISY SIMS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of updating care plans to reflect and manage changing needs

    Wider context from the report

    “1)    The lack of updating of care plans to reflect changing needs and how to manage changing needs ”

    Source location

    EMILY DAISY SIMS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use the introduced care plan template to record multidisciplinary meeting outcomes and update plans in response to changing needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. Lack of updating of care plans to include reference to multi-disciplinary meetings or care needs meetings and decisions taken to manage changing needs. The previous template used for care planning did not include recording of multi-disciplinary meetings with professionals and actions required to allow for changes to be recorded in the care plan. A new care plan template has been introduced to include a more robust system for recording outcomes of meetings with professionals, this information is then reviewed and the care plan is amended and updated according to changes in need. During our last inspection in November 2018, we had some old format care plans that were in the process of being changed over, all care plans have now been changed over to the new format with regular reviewing in place.”

    Source location

    2019-0336-Response-by-Antron-Manor-Care-Home
    Page 1 · response
    Published 10 November 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review care plans monthly and amend them to reflect permanent or temporary changes in residents’ needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. Lack of updating of care plans to reflect changing needs and how to manage changing needs. As I understand care plans in place at the time of the incident were not updated or reviewed appropriately. Our current system consists of monthly review of care plans and amendments are made to reflect care needs and any changes necessary, permanent or temporary.”

    Source location

    2019-0336-Response-by-Antron-Manor-Care-Home
    Page 1 · response
    Published 10 November 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The new care-plan template and regular review process are relied upon to record multidisciplinary decisions and address changing needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. Lack of updating of care plans to include reference to multi-disciplinary meetings or care needs meetings and decisions taken to manage changing needs. The previous template used for care planning did not include recording of multi-disciplinary meetings with professionals and actions required to allow for changes to be recorded in the care plan. A new care plan template has been introduced to include a more robust system for recording outcomes of meetings with professionals, this information is then reviewed and the care plan is amended and updated according to changes in need. During our last inspection in November 2018, we had some old format care plans that were in the process of being changed over, all care plans have now been changed over to the new format with regular reviewing in place.”

    Source location

    2019-0336-Response-by-Antron-Manor-Care-Home
    Page 1 · response
    Published 10 November 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monthly care-plan reviews and amendments are relied upon to address changing care needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. Lack of updating of care plans to reflect changing needs and how to manage changing needs. As I understand care plans in place at the time of the incident were not updated or reviewed appropriately. Our current system consists of monthly review of care plans and amendments are made to reflect care needs and any changes necessary, permanent or temporary.”

    Source location

    2019-0336-Response-by-Antron-Manor-Care-Home
    Page 1 · response
    Published 10 November 2019

    Open published response
  3. Norfolk

    AI-generated summary

    Tyla Katherine Joan COOK · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Tyla Cook had a complex mental health history and took 24 paracetamol tablets on 9 November 2017. After delayed treatment and subsequent deterioration, Tyla suffered a cardiac arrest and died at Queen Elizabeth Hospital on 15 November 2017. Concerns included delays in specialist assessment, the absence of an up-to-date written care and crisis plan, and the failure to organise a planned multi-disciplinary learning event addressing emergency response skills.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain up-to-date written care and crisis plans

    Wider context from the report

    “2. There was no written up-to-date care and crisis plans in place. The most recent written care plan related to Tyla being an inpatient at the Dragonfly Unit, from where he was discharged on 9 August 2017. The written plans were therefore several months out of date. This is against Trust Policy. Evidence was heard that at a CETR meeting on 6 November 2017 a period of a further 3 months was requested to prepare an up to date written care plan. In the event, and despite the family’s repeated requests for plans in writing, it was decided the care plan could be commenced by 30 November 2017, on the basis Tyla’s input into the Care Plan was important and it would take time to gain his meaningful input. The evidence was that there were oral plans in place which were relayed to the parents (including at times of distress), who continued to request plans in writing. The high level of distress and anxiety within Tyla’s home was recognised. An interim written plan was not considered nor that a written plan may have helped the family in providing support to Tyla. Steps have been taken by the Trust to recognise when up to date written plans are not in place and it is understood staff have undergone some work in improving the quality of care plans. However in this case an active decision was made not to update the written plan for some time. Further the evidence did not reveal any insight into the support a written plan could have given the family to support Tyla. ”

    Source location

    Tyla Katherine Joan COOK · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide interim and updated written care and crisis plans, including emergency contacts and safety plans after unplanned discharge, with reviews within seven and 28 days.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Trust response to concern 2: NSFT recognises the importance of care plans for all service users and that these need to be done in collaboration with the service user and their families / carers if possible. However, in some circumstances this can take time in which case an interim care plan will be put in place whilst a more comprehensive and collaborative plan is being developed.”

    Source location

    2019-0299-Response-by-Norfolk-and-Suffolk-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 1 November 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Roll out staff training in care planning and crisis or safety planning to embed the revised care-planning processes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A programme of training being rolled out offers training in care planning and crisis or safety planning with all staff which will ensure the above changes are embedded within teams.”

    Source location

    2019-0299-Response-by-Norfolk-and-Suffolk-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 1 November 2019

    Open published response
  4. Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

    AI-generated summary

    Dr Geraint Brierley Hughes · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Dr Geraint Brierley Hughes was stabbed once in the chest by his wife at their home on 15 November 2013 and died. The substantive concerns included that a formal carer’s assessment had not been completed and that the case coordinator had not maintained regular contact, resulting in care plans and risk assessments not being regularly updated.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to regularly update care plans and risk assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “The reviews into the circumstances of this death had also identified a lack of regular contact by the case coordinator. In turn, this meant that care plans and risk assessments were not regularly updated. Of note, this has not been identified in the usual supervisory reviews. ”

    Source location

    Dr Geraint Brierley Hughes · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor Community Mental Health Team compliance using dashboards, reports and monthly performance meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust’s Community Mental Health Teams monitor compliance through a compliance dashboard. Individual members of the team can access their own compliance report. The compliance report details information including days since last appointment; care plan date and the number of days since the care plan was created; risk assessment date and days since last risk assessment. Where a care assessment or risk assessment is out of date this is highlighted in the compliance report in red providing a visual tool to assist with assessing compliance. Team managers also discuss compliance with individual team members within supervision.”

    Source location

    2019-0268-Response-by-Cornwall-Partnership-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 18 October 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement structured recording and oversight of staff supervision under the revised Supervision Policy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Supervision has always been available to staff but we now have better recording of supervision with much more structure and focus than previously. The Trust’s Supervision Policy was reviewed and re-written in May 2018 to provide a framework for the delivery of comprehensive, consistent and good quality supervision for all our staff. The policy deals with the three elements of a comprehensive supervision structure; managerial supervision, caseload supervision and clinical/ professional supervision. As a minimum caseload supervision should include a review of record keeping quality; frequency of contact; access to appropriate treatment; any cases currently subject to or which may be referred to Adult Safeguarding; any Child Safeguarding concerns; use of Routine Enquiry; non-attendance and subsequent management of cases; self-neglect and complex cases with multiple services are engaged.”

    Source location

    2019-0268-Response-by-Cornwall-Partnership-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 18 October 2019

    Open published response
  5. East Sussex

    AI-generated summary

    Justin Peter Gallagher · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Justin Peter Gallagher was received at HMP Lewes on 20 March 2016 and was later found collapsed in his segregation-block cell on 24 May 2016. He was taken to hospital, where he died on 17 June 2016; the post-mortem recorded hypoxic brain injury, cardiac arrest and laryngeal carcinoma with upper airway obstruction among the causes. Concerns included the absence of his previous medical history, a proper care plan and a single clinician responsible for his care, cancelled hospital appointments, missed opportunities to diagnose his cancer, lack of family involvement, and separate healthcare organisations using unconnected database systems.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to draft proper care plans

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The prison never obtained his previous medical history. No proper care plan was drafted for him and there was no single clinician responsible for his care. ”

    Source location

    Justin Peter Gallagher · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Check that newly arrived prisoners receive a full health assessment and care plan within seven days, recording checks for healthcare staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• a nominated member of staff checking that all newly arrived prisoners have been offered a full general health assessment to include the drafting of a care plan within 7 days of arrival. The checks to be noted on an internal document which is shared with all healthcare staff.”

    Source location

    2019-0491-Response-by-NHS-England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 16 August 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Healthcare providers are responsible for the quality and safety of care provided at HMP Lewes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Providers of healthcare services are responsible for the quality and safety of the care they provide. I expect the healthcare providers at HMP Lewes to look into the care provided to Mr Gallagher and to consider where improvements can be made. This includes how they work with the prison authorities and other relevant organisations, including NHS England which is responsible for commissioning healthcare services for prisoners. Given its role in monitoring, inspecting and regulating the providers of health and social care in prisons, my officials have brought your reports to the attention of the Care Quality Commission (CQC).”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 16 August 2019

    Open published response
  6. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Karanbir Singh CHEEMA · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Karanbir Singh CHEEMA, a pupil at William Perkin High School with multiple food allergies and asthma, went into anaphylactic shock after another pupil threw cheese at him on 28 June 2017 and died. Concerns included inadequate awareness of his allergies, insufficient checking and availability of EpiPens, an out-of-date EpiPen, failures in sharing and standardising allergy action plans, a cancelled follow-up appointment, and shortcomings in emergency response guidance and training.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to check or audit school allergy care plans and medication boxes

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Karanbir’s school care plan and medical box were not checked or audited to ensure, for example, that his care plan stipulated two EpiPens® (adrenaline auto-injectors), the box contained two EpiPens. ”

    Source location

    Karanbir Singh CHEEMA · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Frederick Raymond BROOKER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Frederick Raymond Brooker, who used a wheelchair in a residential care home, sustained multiple falls, including a fall on 10 July 2018 that caused a catastrophic traumatic bleed and from which he died on 14 July 2018. The principal concerns were that, despite his recognised high risk of falling, the care home did not put adequate care plans or other measures in place, review the wheelchair or involve relevant services, investigate subsequent falls, or provide evidence of encouragement to use the wheelchair seatbelt.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of care plans addressing identified high fall risk

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Despite Mr Brooker sustaining multiple falls of increasing severity, no reasonable measures were taken by the Care Home staff to address the high risk of falling. Risk assessments were completed. The high risk was recognised, but there were no care plans to address the identified risk. ”

    Source location

    Mr Frederick Raymond BROOKER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement organisation-wide multifactorial falls risk assessments, including reassessment, care planning, documentation and review requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “a. Multi-factorial Risk Assessments”

    Source location

    2019-0097-Response-by-HC-One
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 June 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Falls among older people cannot always be prevented, although risks can be minimised and staff responses improved.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Regrettably, it is not uncommon for older people to experience a fall, for a variety of reasons. Such falls cannot always be prevented but as an organisation we are committed to supporting people to maintain their safety wherever possible and to ensure that our Colleagues respond appropriately in the event that a fall does occur.”

    Source location

    2019-0097-Response-by-HC-One
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 June 2019

    Open published response
  8. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Nicky Raymond Reilly · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Nicky Raymond Reilly, also known as Mr Mohamed Saeed-Alim, was an inmate at HMP Manchester after spending six years at Broadmoor High Security Hospital. He was found hanging by a ligature in his cell on 19 October 2016 and was pronounced deceased at 14.43. The report raised concerns about the lack of continuation of the Care Program Approach, incomplete multidisciplinary records and coordination, limited psychological input and record keeping, insufficient staff training, separation of mental health and psychology records, and medication-refusal processes.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of psychiatric input into care plans

    Wider context from the report

    “Whilst NR had been an in-patient at Broadmoor he had been subject to the Care Program Approach (CPA). There was no explanation as to why this was not continued when he was transferred back into the Prison Service. The lack of continuation of the CPA and the missed opportunities this presented, particularly in respect of earlier input from Psychiatry, for someone with such complex needs is of concern to the Court. Care plans relating to NR, as discussed below, should have had the benefit of Psychiatric input. ”

    Source location

    Mr Nicky Raymond Reilly · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Manchester City

    AI-generated summary

    Veronica Gregory · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Veronica Gregory, who was 83 and living in a nursing and care home, suffered an unwitnessed incident followed by a delayed recognition of pain and a fractured neck of femur. She underwent surgery, developed pneumonia and died on 23 November 2017. The principal concerns included inadequate falls-risk care planning and review, incomplete observation and clinical records, insufficient staffing and supervision, and failures to seek medical assistance promptly.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate and insufficient care plans addressing specific risk issues

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Inadequate and insufficient care plans including specific risk issues together with, a lack of appropriate review and reassessment either following an incident or as a matter or general practise. ”

    Source location

    Veronica Gregory · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of appropriate review and reassessment of care plans

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Inadequate and insufficient care plans including specific risk issues together with, a lack of appropriate review and reassessment either following an incident or as a matter or general practise. ”

    Source location

    Veronica Gregory · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Formulate risk-specific care plans, review them monthly or when needs change, and audit completion and risk management.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Care plans are now formulated to incorporate specific risk issues like falls; these are risk assessed and reviewed monthly. If a change had occurred since the last review, or occurs in-between this period, the risk is then assessed again with the new change(s) incorporated into the Resident’s care plan. Care plans are now audited to ensure reviews are done and the risks identified are managed appropriately.”

    Source location

    2018-0377-Response-by-Zinnia-Healthcare
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 May 2019

    Open published response
  10. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Beryl Ann Walsh · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Beryl Ann Walsh sustained catastrophic head injuries in an unwitnessed fall from her bed at Beechwood Lodge Care Home on 3 June 2018, which led directly to her death. The principal concerns were missed opportunities to identify her as being at high risk of falls, refer her to the falls team, provide falls-prevention equipment, and undertake falls-risk assessments and care plans.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to undertake falls prevention care plans

    Wider context from the report

    “1. That there were multiple missed opportunities to identify the deceased as a person of high risk of falls and to escalate her care by way of a referral to the falls team. Furthermore, there were multiple missed opportunities to provide the deceased with falls prevention equipment and to undertake falls risk assessments and care plans. I remain concerned that appropriate action to minimise the risk of deaths occurring in similar circumstances has not been taken by Beechwood Lodge Care Home. During the last 12 months of her life she had fallen on multiple occasions. However, she had not been referred to the falls prevention team and had not been provided with any falls prevention equipment. No care plans and falls risk assessments had been undertaken ”

    Source location

    Beryl Ann Walsh · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add safety-equipment risk assessments to care plans, including whether equipment is used and reasons for non-use.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. We have now put all new risk assessments in all care plans about safety equipment whether they use it or why they do and the reasons why they don’t. I also have put in place a falls matrix, so I can monitor falls and do referrals to falls team when required.”

    Source location

    2018-0359-Response-by-Beechwood-Lodge
    Page 1 · response
    Published 25 April 2019

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026