Recurring concern

Failure to reliably respond to patient breathing emergencies

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 3 Dec 2013•Latest report 16 Apr 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of controls specifically dedicated to responding to patient breathing emergencies, including recognition and assessment of abnormal or absent breathing, airway-protective positioning, access to emergency equipment, staff response, clinical attendance, ambulance activation and related immediate escalation.

Not included

  • Excludes generic emergency-response, staffing, training or equipment deficiencies that are not directly tied to a patient breathing emergency.
  • Excludes failures limited to later hospital handover, definitive treatment or post-resuscitation care after the immediate breathing-emergency response was effective.
  • Excludes non-patient emergencies and emergency responses for hazards unrelated to breathing, airway obstruction or cardiac arrest arising from an unrecognised breathing emergency.
  • Excludes condition-specific respiratory diagnosis or chronic respiratory-care failures where no immediate breathing-emergency response deficiency is identified.
Reports
27

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
28

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
58

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care5
HM Prison and Probation Service3
NHS England3
Association of Ambulance Chief Executives2
College of Policing2
London Ambulance Service NHS Trust2
Ministry of Justice2
Resuscitation Council UK2
Abbotswood1
Aspray House1
British Society For Genetic Medicine1
Bupa Care Homes (GL) Limited1
Cardiac Risk in the Young1
Care Outlook Ltd1
Care UK1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Andrew Vizard · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Andrew Vizard, aged 58, died from a pulmonary embolism on 14 July 2022 after suffering cardiac arrests while detained in hospital under section 2 of the Mental Health Act 1983. The report identified delays in obtaining monitoring equipment, a ward doctor attending, and calling an ambulance when concerns arose about his breathing. It also raised concern that existing staff training and emergency-response systems may not ensure an immediate and effective response in similar life-threatening situations.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Emergency response systems failing to ensure an immediate and effective response to concerns about patient breathing

    Wider context from the report

    “Despite there being concerns for an unresponsive patient’s breathing, it took: a) At least 6 minutes to obtain and utilise physical monitoring equipment. b) Nearly ten minutes for a ward doctor to attend the patient. c) Over 10 minutes for an ambulance to be called. Existing staff training and systems of emergency response do not appear to ensure an immediate and effective response in circumstances where there are concerns for a patient’s breathing. Although the delays did not cause or contribute to death in this case, I am concerned that if there are similar delays in similar life-threatening situations in future, deaths will occur. ”

    Source location

    Andrew Vizard · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate staff training for immediate and effective emergency response to concerns about patient breathing

    Wider context from the report

    “Despite there being concerns for an unresponsive patient’s breathing, it took: a) At least 6 minutes to obtain and utilise physical monitoring equipment. b) Nearly ten minutes for a ward doctor to attend the patient. c) Over 10 minutes for an ambulance to be called. Existing staff training and systems of emergency response do not appear to ensure an immediate and effective response in circumstances where there are concerns for a patient’s breathing. Although the delays did not cause or contribute to death in this case, I am concerned that if there are similar delays in similar life-threatening situations in future, deaths will occur. ”

    Source location

    Andrew Vizard · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. Gwent

    AI-generated summary

    Dorothy Anne Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Dorothy Anne Jones developed a chest infection and was assessed at home as needing immediate hospital admission. An ambulance did not attend until over nine hours after it was requested, and paramedics found that she had died. The report identified concerns about ambulance response times for Amber 1 patients, chronological allocation without further consideration of clinical need, and an ad hoc process for expediting responses.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of the current ambulance triage algorithm to assign appropriate urgency to choking, breathing difficulty and drowsiness

    Wider context from the report

    “4. The evidence suggested that a patient who was choking, had difficulty breathing and was drowsy would still be assessed, under the current algorithm adopted by WAST, as meeting the requirement for an Amber 1 response. ”

    Source location

    Dorothy Anne Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Regularly review Medical Priority Dispatch System code categorisation using clinical and operational data.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To ensure that the Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust (WAST) maintains a clinically safe response to patients, regular reviews are undertaken of current Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS) code categorisation by the Clinical Priority Assessment Software (CPAS) group.”

    Source location

    Response from Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 January 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operational concerns about ambulance service delivery are best addressed by the Welsh Ambulance Services Trust.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I note you have also written to ████████, Chief Executive of the Welsh Ambulance Services Trust and I would expect him to respond on the detail of the concerns you raised as these relate to operational matters and are best addressed by the Trust. I can, however, outline the actions being taken by the Welsh Government to drive national and local improvement in the delivery of safe and timely ambulance services.”

    Source location

    Response from Minster for Health and Social Services
    Page 1 · response
    Published 24 January 2023

    Open published response
  3. West Yorkshire Eastern

    AI-generated summary

    Lewis Steven Johnson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lewis Steven Johnson was found unresponsive with a neck ligature at HMP Wealstun on 12 December 2019 and later died in hospital following a further cardiac arrest. The report raised concerns about the absence of overnight healthcare staff and the prison officers’ delayed and inadequate response, including lack of CPR, defibrillator use and consideration of the recovery position.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to consider placing an unresponsive prisoner in the recovery position

    Wider context from the report

    “(6) The four prison officers present in the cell did not discuss the need for CPR. The possibility of using a defibrillator was not mentioned. Mr Johnson was left in the cell in a seated position without the wisdom of placing him in the recovery position being considered. ”

    Source location

    Lewis Steven Johnson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the emergency-response training video and distribute it to training centres and prisons for staff training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In respect of the EFAW training all prison officers receive during their entry level training, all first aid training certificates are valid for three years and although not mandatory, staff are encouraged to undertake refresher training to maintain their basic skills and keep up to date with any changes to first-aid procedures. The initial training for staff includes an HMPPS video which shows how to respond to an emergency situation where a prisoner has attempted suicide. This is currently being updated to reflect changes to policy and equipment available since the original video was produced. This video covers the use of prison issue ligature tools, emergency response codes, placing someone in the recovery position and considerations such as when to initiate first aid and the use of defibrillators.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 December 2022

    Open published response
  4. Inner South London

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Ian McDonald Taylor · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Ian McDonald Taylor suffered a cardiac arrest after a physical altercation while in police detention and died in hospital. Concerns included the police officer’s assessment and communication of Mr Taylor’s breathing difficulties, access to his inhaler while awaiting an ambulance, and the exceptionally delayed ambulance response.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide access to prescribed emergency inhaler medication during public-place police detention

    Wider context from the report

    “Mr Taylor was in police detention in a public place and was known to be a sufferer of both COPD and asthma, required to take a regular combination of inhalers and had a history of emergency admission to hospital with life threatening asthma. He repeatedly asked urgently for his inhaler, which he said was in his pocket, and that he needed it and that he felt he was going to die. Police did not find it (although a broken inhaler found later at the scene might have been his). If he had been in a custody suite he would have had access to a custody nurse or medical practitioner who could have prescribed it. ”

    Source location

    Mr Ian McDonald Taylor · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    MHRA owns the regulations governing non-prescribed police inhalers and must receive supporting evidence before legislative change can be considered.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “You may wish to note that allowing non-prescribed storage of salbutamol inhalers¹ by police officers will require a change in legislation - which in this case is the Human Medicines Regulations 2012. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) own these regulations, and will need to be presented with evidence that supports the case for making a change to the regulations.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 20 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Responsibility for considering police access to inhalers lies with the Home Office, with Department support.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In terms of process for considering whether inhalers should be available to police officers, this would need to be undertaken by the Home Office (as the sponsor department for the police services) supported by the Department.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 September 2022

    Open published response
  5. West Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    RITA GIULIANNA NICOLA BRITTEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Rita Giuliana Nicola Britten, a detained patient, choked while trying to swallow pieces of fresh apple and later died in hospital after life support was withdrawn. The report records concerns about the lack of clear guidance and effective rescue techniques for choking incidents involving overweight, obese or bariatric individuals, including the possible use of inversion techniques and specialist equipment. The jury also recorded concerns about communication and handover, recording and access to key information, incomplete risk assessments, and inadequate first aid training.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clear national emergency and resuscitation guidance for choking emergencies where conventional abdominal thrusts are not possible or effective

    Wider context from the report

    “The concern is of want of clear guidance on the steps to be taken to most effectively rescue the individual from the urgent and developing choking emergency when that individual does not conform to the competent adult to whom conventional abdominal thrusts are possible or might be effectively applied. In particular, this concern relates to but is not limited to the overweight/obese/bariatric individual (however that may be best described). a) There should be clear national emergency /resuscitation guidelines for dealing effectively with choking incidents where the individual is overweight/obese or otherwise where “conventional abdominal thrusts” are not possible or are less able to be effectively applied. In Mrs Britten’s case a significant element of early rescue techniques was compromised. It is perceived this will be an increasing present and future risk in the UK population due to obesity. b) There should be early review and assessment of papers that discuss the efficacy (or otherwise) in such circumstances of “inversion” of the affected choking individual said to be set out in: Hubert Blaine et al in American Journal of Medicine ref, Am J Med 2010 Dec; 123 (12) And “Effect of body position on relieve of foreign body from the airway”, Artur Luczak AIMS Public Health 6(2): 154-159 And how this or similar technique(s) might have application in the Hospital/clinical setting in which this choking episode occurred. c) There should be identified and assessed any specialist equipment to assist in these circumstances. ”

    Source location

    RITA GIULIANNA NICOLA BRITTEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add a frequently asked question to the national website explaining the position on choking management when abdominal thrusts are not possible.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In preparing our guidance we considered the use of abdominal thrusts with the person lying on their back but decided not to include them given that chest compressions are probably more effective and our assessment that there is a higher risk life threatening abdominal injuries from the use of the abdominal thrust.”

    Source location

    Response from Resuscitation Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Set out a stepwise choking-management approach in basic life support guidance, including chest compressions when abdominal thrusts fail or cannot be administered.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Resuscitation Council UK sets out its guidance for the management of foreign body airway obstruction ('choking') in our basic life support guidelines.¹ These guidelines are drawn from the recommendations”

    Source location

    Response from Resuscitation Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 16 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Assess abdominal-thrust alternatives for people with increased body mass and exclude supine abdominal thrusts from guidance because of safety and effectiveness concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Chest compressions in the supine position (on their back) typically raise intrathoracic pressure to a greater extent than abdominal thrusts.⁵ They can be delivered irrespective of the persons size as it does not require the rescuer to encircle their arms around the person as is required for abdominal thrusts.”

    Source location

    Response from Resuscitation Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Teach healthcare professionals to use laryngoscopes and Magill’s forceps for foreign-body removal under direct vision in the advanced life support course.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our guidelines recommend that healthcare professionals use a laryngoscope (a device put in the mouth with a light on the end) and Magill’s forceps (like pincers) to remove the foreign body under direct vision. Our recommendations are informed by our experience as well as published evidence demonstrating this can be an effective technique.⁴”

    Source location

    Response from Resuscitation Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 16 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Include immediate availability of laryngoscopes and Magill’s forceps in quality standards for mental health inpatient care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our guidelines recommend that healthcare professionals use a laryngoscope (a device put in the mouth with a light on the end) and Magill’s forceps (like pincers) to remove the foreign body under direct vision. Our recommendations are informed by our experience as well as published evidence demonstrating this can be an effective technique.⁴”

    Source location

    Response from Resuscitation Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 16 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Assess suction-based airway-clearance devices for safety and effectiveness and determine whether evidence supports routine use.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have also assessed the evidence for suction-based airway clearance devices but consider there is insufficient evidence currently about either their safety or effectiveness, to advocate for their routine use. This view is aligned with the 2022 Evidence update on this topic from the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation.”

    Source location

    Response from Resuscitation Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 16 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Resuscitation Council UK has addressed all concerns raised in the report.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I note that you also sent your Report to the Resuscitation Council UK and I have had sight of their response. I am assured that Resuscitation Council UK have addressed all the concerns raised in your Report.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 16 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing basic life support guidelines provide a stepwise choking response, including chest compressions suitable for people of any size.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Resuscitation Council UK sets out its guidance for the management of foreign body airway obstruction ('choking') in our basic life support guidelines.¹ These guidelines are drawn from the recommendations”

    Source location

    Response from Resuscitation Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 16 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inversion or chair/table manoeuvres will not be introduced because evidence is insufficient and manual handling poses injury risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “b) There should be early review and assessment of papers that discuss the efficacy (or otherwise) in such circumstances of “inversion” of the affected choking individual said to be set out in Hubert Blaine et al in American Journal of Medicine ref, Am J Med 2010 Dec; 123 (12) And “Effect of body position on relieve of foreign body from the airway”, Artur Luczak AIMS Public Health 6(2):154-159”

    Source location

    Response from Resuscitation Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 16 September 2022

    Open published response
  6. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Cristofaro PRIOLO · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Cristofaro Priolo, an 80-year-old man with progressive Alzheimer’s dementia who lived in a nursing home, choked on cauliflower cheese on 25 November 2020 and died. The report identifies concerns that his food was not prepared or fed in accordance with his assessed needs, and that staff failed to provide appropriate first aid, recognise cardiac arrest, and attempt effective CPR.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of frequent appropriate emergency resuscitation training

    Wider context from the report

    “A BUPA internal investigation has already taken place and identified some learning points. However, there are matters outstanding around training and audit. Obviously, the cauliflower for Mr Priolo should have been prepared properly for him by the catering staff, but quite apart from that, Mr Priolo’s carers were never assessed when they were feeding him. Whilst the carer who was feeding him when he choked knew that he needed small, soft mouthfuls that he should be allowed to swallow completely before offering the next, that is not what happened. He was fed a large quantity of cauliflower cheese, it seems relatively quickly, that was undercooked to the point of being almost raw, making it much too hard for him to swallow safely. Staff, including qualified nursing staff, then failed to give appropriate first aid. Even 18 months after the event when they were giving evidence in court this week – the inquest had been delayed to allow a police investigation – some staff were unable to describe the correct treatment for choking. Most significantly, nursing staff failed to recognise that Mr Priolo had suffered a cardiac arrest. They then failed to attempt CPR. After the arrival of paramedics, one member of nursing staff did attempt to give chest compressions, but these were ineffective. That is likely to be the result of panic and distress. These are common feelings in an emergency situation, but the risk of them overwhelming resuscitation efforts may be reduced by frequent appropriate training. ”

    Source location

    Cristofaro PRIOLO · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide and competency-assess Basic Life Support and DNACPR training, including practical choking and CPR assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Training around Basic Life Support (“BLS” – the content of which includes addressing and dealing with choking incidents and CPR) and DNACPRs. This training involved an online/classroom based training session, as well as a practical session, where learners are practically assessed, and are not deemed competent until the trainer is satisfied that a learner is competent. We are mindful of your on-going concerns in relation to those nurses who gave evidence during the inquest, and we have said more on this point below – see “concerns 3, 4 & 5”, below.”

    Source location

    Response from BUPA Care Services
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Have the Internal Lead Inspector attend Basic Life Support training to assess its quality and efficacy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “9. Our Internal Lead Inspector will attend training in Basic Life Support (BLS) to assess the quality and efficacy of the training provided internally by Bupa. To reassure you, our BLS and Emergency First Aid at Work trainers are all qualified and trained by external training providers. During this training our staff are evaluated and leave the classroom assessed as competent. This includes a practical assessment of delivery of chest compressions.”

    Source location

    Response from BUPA Care Services
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Retrain remaining Highgate staff and ensure they are competent and confident to manage future choking, cardiac arrest and CPR incidents.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “10. Given the concerns raised at inquest regarding the competence of some of The Highgate staff, we will ensure that those who remain within The Highgate are retrained, competent and confident to manage any further incidents in the future.”

    Source location

    Response from BUPA Care Services
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Consider implementing more frequent competency checks or opportunities to practise chest compressions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We will, however, consider whether or not to implement more frequent competency checks, or opportunities to practice chest compressions. It should be kept in mind though that nurses have a professional obligation to take responsibility and ensure that they feel confident to carry out their role and maintain their competencies in line with NMC requirements.”

    Source location

    Response from BUPA Care Services
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing evidence indicates Highgate BLS delegates passed competency assessments, disputing that training competence was absent.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We did, however, make enquiries with our Learning and Development team as to the training provided to staff at Highgate, including some of those who gave evidence at the inquest. We wanted to be sure that there had been no issue with their engagement or competency checks. The feedback from our trainer on the BLS training delivered at Highgate was that all delegates (which would include some of those who gave evidence during the inquest) had all passed first time and had a completed competency assessment on file, which confirmed, amongst other things, competent to deliver CPR and how to respond to a choking incident. However, the relevant staff will attend further training to ensure competency.”

    Source location

    Response from BUPA Care Services
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Annual BLS training frequency is not out of step with other social care providers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “11. We also note your comments in relation to the frequency of training. At present, BLS is scheduled on an annual basis, although during the pandemic, there was a time during which practical assessments by trainers could not take place, due to measures put in place to comply with government guidance and infection prevention control measures. To the best of our knowledge, the frequency of our training is not out of step with other social care providers and our focus will be as outlined above, which is ensuring the quality and competency of our trainers, the content of our training and the competency checks, to ensure staff leave training confident and competent.”

    Source location

    Response from BUPA Care Services
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 May 2022

    Open published response
  7. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Gary OTTWAY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Gary Ottway, aged 41, died after being found in cardiac arrest while detained alone in a seclusion room under constant nursing observation during a severe mental health episode. The report raised concerns about whether observation was constant or effective, delays in entering the room and obtaining emergency equipment, gaps in available medical training and resources, and ineffective chest compressions. The inquest determined that he died from natural causes involving two heart conditions.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in calling the rapid response team when non-respiration is suspected

    Wider context from the report

    “4. The senior duty nurse told me that the nurses would not enter the seclusion room until the rapid response team was present, but he did not call the rapid response team as soon as he suspected that Mr Ottway was not breathing. Instead, he started by going to get one of the other nurses, which took a couple of minutes; then he rang the duty doctor; and only after that did he radio for the rapid response team. ”

    Source location

    Gary OTTWAY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Martin Keith Sullivan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Martin Keith Sullivan, aged 15, died on 24 November 2019 after experiencing a severe asthma attack. He was prioritised as Category 2 during two 999 calls, and his father was not asked about taking him directly to hospital; ambulance delays followed before Martin was taken to hospital, where resuscitation was unsuccessful. Concerns included whether the MPDS algorithm and call-handler script recognised the severity of his symptoms, whether Category 2 response times could be met, and whether direct transport to hospital should have been discussed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of the asthma triage script to require direct questioning about ineffective breathing

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Rule 6 of the MPDS Protocol recognises that asthma patients are generally very experienced in managing their disease. Noting that statements such as can’t breathe and unable to breathe or a similar description should be considered as ineffective breathing. Ineffective breathing eliciting a Category 1 response. It is not clear whether this requires a direct question from the EMD or whether it falls into the volunteered category of factors. There was no direct question from the EMD in this case. Given the significance of breathing problems in an asthma attack, and the inevitable progression without intervention, it is imperative in my view that the script seeks more detail and should not rely on information being ‘volunteered’. ”

    Source location

    Martin Keith Sullivan · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review progress on ineffective-breathing improvement actions through monthly commissioner-led clinical quality assurance meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Progress against these actions is regularly reviewed at each monthly meeting of the commissioner-led Regional Clinical Quality Assurance Committee (RCQAC) to ensure that actions continue to be taken, and to support NWAS in national discussions on the ineffective breathing MPDS algorithm and working closely with the IAED to establish best practice for the identification of ineffective breathing and developing processes that will further reduce future risk.”

    Source location

    2021-0056-Response-from-Clinical-Commissioning-Group-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 March 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold a learning event for ambulance services and triage-system providers to share best practice on safely identifying ineffective breathing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to ensure that the process of identifying ineffective breathing is embedded within all ambulance services NHS England and NHS Improvement will hold a learning event with all ambulance services, inviting the involvement of triage system providers, to share best practice and ensure ambulance services are enabled to utilise the triage systems safely and effectively.”

    Source location

    2021-0056-Response-from-NHS-England-and-NHS-Improvement-Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 8 March 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NWAS, not commissioners, decides which clinical decision-support tool operates in the 999 environment; response categories are nationally determined.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The choice of which clinical decision support tool to operate in the 999 environment lies with NWAS as the ambulance service provider. MPDS is an internationally developed and accredited tool provided by the International Academies of Emergency Dispatch (IAED) and is used by several UK ambulance services. The outcomes reached after MPDS assessment are aligned to the ambulance response categories. These are nationally determined and not set by NWAS or commissioners.”

    Source location

    2021-0056-Response-from-Clinical-Commissioning-Group-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 March 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    As of January 2021, NWAS was not a national outlier in recognising ineffective breathing and performed similarly to other ambulance services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The current position is that as of January 2021 NWAS perform similarly to other ambulance services in this regard and are not a national outlier in recognition of ineffective breathing.”

    Source location

    2021-0056-Response-from-Clinical-Commissioning-Group-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 March 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    When used correctly, the MPDS algorithm identifies life-threatening asthma and results in a Category 1 response.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is not the case that the system is relying on the information being offered/volunteered but rather that the questions within Protocol 6 will elicit the information required. It is in response to both the open and closed questions that the EMD must recognise ineffective breathing in a patient with asthma. When applied correctly this is a very reliable method of determining life threatening respiratory distress including life threatening asthma. Any patient who is identified as ineffective breathing should receive a category 1 response. Acute severe asthma”

    Source location

    2021-0056-Response-from-NHS-England-and-NHS-Improvement-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 March 2021

    Open published response
  9. London (West)

    AI-generated summary

    Amir Siman-Tov · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Amir Siman-Tov died at Colnbrook Immigration Removal Centre on 17 February 2016 after taking an overdose of codeine. The concerns included inconsistent involvement of healthcare staff in the ACDT self-harm reduction process, inconsistent medication checks, inadequate hospital discharge information and handover, insufficient monitoring after his return, and shortcomings in the emergency response.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to position an unresponsive patient on the floor for effective resuscitation

    Wider context from the report

    “13. Nursing and other staff arrived. A custody officer asked the nurse if Mr Siman-Tov should be moved to the floor for resuscitation. The nurse replied no. Dr Harris, an expert in Emergency Medicine said that he should have been moved to the floor for effective resuscitation. This puts detainees at risk. ”

    Source location

    Amir Siman-Tov · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. West Sussex

    AI-generated summary

    James William Francis · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    James William Francis, who had a history of falls and balance difficulties, suffered an unwitnessed fall at his care home on 9 April 2017 and later developed repeated vomiting and deterioration. He was admitted to hospital with a large subdural haematoma and died on 11 April 2017. The principal concerns included failures in shift handover and monitoring, delays in seeking medical advice, inadequate information provided to paramedics, the patient’s positioning, staff training, and whether relevant guidelines sufficiently addressed this type of injury in elderly patients.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to place an incapacitated patient in a position that protects the airway

    Wider context from the report

    “It would seem the care home staff had not considered placing Mr Francis on the floor into the recovery position until requested to do so by the 999 operator. From reading the transcript it suggests that when the operator asked the staff to do this, efforts were made to comply and then ensure Mr Francis head was tilted to keep the airway clear and his breathing became a little less shallow. Conversely, the ambulance crew were both very clear that their immediate concern on entering the room was the poor position of Jim in a seated/slumped position that may have compromised his airway ”

    Source location

    James William Francis · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Increase and maintain staff safety training, competency assessment, mandatory-training tracking and first-aider coverage on every shift.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All care staff now receive training on “Recognising a Deteriorating Service User” and in addition they also receive first aid training.”

    Source location

    2019-0202-Response-by-Shaw-Healthcare
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 August 2019

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026