Recurring concern

Failure to provide timely access to clinically indicated CT scanning

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 15 Oct 2013•Latest report 17 Feb 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of the CT-scanning access and provision process that delay, prevent or leave unresolved clinically indicated CT imaging, including direct referral access, service availability, out-of-hours or weekend provision, capacity, scheduling, authorisation and completion across clinical settings.

Not included

  • Excludes failures limited to interpretation, review or clinical action after CT images have been made available, unless access or completion is also deficient.
  • Excludes generic diagnostic-imaging, staffing, equipment or commissioning deficiencies that are not specifically tied to access to or provision of CT scanning.
  • Excludes other imaging modalities, including MRI, ultrasound and plain radiography, unless the assertion specifically concerns CT scanning.
  • Excludes failures limited to the content of a named CT request pathway where CT access or completion is not itself the unsafe condition.
Reports
26

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
29

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
25

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care4
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence3
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust3
Care Quality Commission2
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust2
NHS England2
Royal London Hospital2
Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust2
Stockport NHS Foundation Trust2
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust2
Ashford and St Peter'S Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1
Barts Health NHS Trust1
County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust1
Greater Manchester1
Homerton University Hospital1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Black Country

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Frank Hayward · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Frank Hayward fell at home on 12 November 2017, sustaining an odontoid peg fracture and subdural haemorrhage, and died on 10 December 2017 after his condition declined. The concerns included failures to correctly assess and diagnose his injuries, delays in Trauma and Orthopaedics review and urgent CT scanning, and poor systems and communication in obtaining a cervical collar.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in obtaining urgent CT scans

    Wider context from the report

    “2. There was also evidence of poor systems in place in providing a collar for the patient and poor communication between the Orthotics Department and ward based staff. In addition there was a significant delay in obtaining an urgent CT scan. ”

    Source location

    Mr Frank Hayward · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise the head-injury guideline to align with NICE guidance and add head-and-neck imaging prompts to the proforma.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The guideline used by clinicians to inform diagnostic testing and treatment of Head Injuries has been revised in line with the latest National Institute for Excellence (NICE) Clinical Guideline (CG176). Our guideline includes an algorithm of when to image the spine and the head injury proforma now includes a checklist for both head and neck imaging as a further prompt. This proforma was traditionally only used in the Emergency Department (ED), but will now be a requirement for all clinicians to use on any patient who sustains a fall in hospital as well as those who present to the ED. Equally the guideline will apply to anyone who has sustained a head injury, providing consistency with referrals and observations.”

    Source location

    Frank-Hayward-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 March 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require all clinicians to use the head-injury proforma for hospital falls and Emergency Department presentations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The guideline used by clinicians to inform diagnostic testing and treatment of Head Injuries has been revised in line with the latest National Institute for Excellence (NICE) Clinical Guideline (CG176). Our guideline includes an algorithm of when to image the spine and the head injury proforma now includes a checklist for both head and neck imaging as a further prompt. This proforma was traditionally only used in the Emergency Department (ED), but will now be a requirement for all clinicians to use on any patient who sustains a fall in hospital as well as those who present to the ED. Equally the guideline will apply to anyone who has sustained a head injury, providing consistency with referrals and observations.”

    Source location

    Frank-Hayward-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 March 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor implementation of the approved head-injury guideline, including imaging, observation duration, specialist referrals and follow-through of requested actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We will monitor the use of the approved Head Injury guideline following a period of implementation, but in particular we will be ensuring that:”

    Source location

    Frank-Hayward-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 March 2018

    Open published response
  2. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Georgia Polydorou · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Georgia Polydorou was an in-patient being treated for congestive cardiac failure when she fell while going to the toilet on 10 July 2017. She later became unresponsive and was found to have a large acute subdural haematoma; after surgery and a prolonged period on a ventilator, she died on 18 September 2017. Concerns included the decision not to perform a CT scan within eight hours of the fall despite concurrent use of aspirin, clopidogrel and enoxaparin, the delayed presentation of head-injury signs in elderly patients, and communication difficulties relating to her limited English and the significance of headache after the fall.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide timely CT scanning after falls in elderly patients taking blood-thinning medications

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Mrs Polydorou did not receive a CT scan within 8 hours of her fall because she had a Glasgow Coma Scale of 15/15, she did not have any abnormal neurological observations and was not taking Warfarin. Mrs Polydorou was concurrently taking aspirin, clopidogrel and enoxaparin during her hospital admission. All of which have the effect of thinning the blood. (2) Evidence from a consultant neurosurgeon established that there can be a significant delay in elderly patients showing signs of head injury following a fall, particularly where they are taking blood thinning medications. ”

    Source location

    Georgia Polydorou · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Log the concerns with the NICE guideline surveillance team for consideration in ongoing surveillance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following our considerations, we believe both guidelines appropriately reflect the available evidence and do not need to be amended at this time. Nevertheless, the issues have been logged with the NICE guideline surveillance team, and will be taken into account when the guideline areas are next considered for review.”

    Source location

    2018-0079-Response-by-N.I.C.E
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Take the issues into account when the relevant guideline areas are next reviewed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following our considerations, we believe both guidelines appropriately reflect the available evidence and do not need to be amended at this time. Nevertheless, the issues have been logged with the NICE guideline surveillance team, and will be taken into account when the guideline areas are next considered for review.”

    Source location

    2018-0079-Response-by-N.I.C.E
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing VTE and head-injury guidelines appropriately reflect available evidence and do not require amendment at this time.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We also have a guideline on the assessment and early management of head injury (CG176). This guideline includes recommendations on performing CT head scans in patients on warfarin (who have no other indications for CT head scan), reflecting the available evidence. The guideline developers considered there to be limited evidence regarding patients using other antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs within studies deriving or validating clinical decision rules for determining which patients need CT head scans - particularly, evidence in determining whether they are at increased risk of intracranial haemorrhage. The guideline developers therefore made a research recommendation on this issue.”

    Source location

    2018-0079-Response-by-N.I.C.E
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 June 2018

    Open published response
  3. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Edwin Hooper · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Edwin Hooper was admitted with multiple serious medical conditions, including decompensated heart failure, kidney disease, sepsis and peripheral vascular disease. After a fall while receiving anticoagulant treatment, he sustained a traumatic intracranial bleed and progressively deteriorated before receiving palliative care and dying on 15 November 2016. The principal concern was whether patients with head injuries who are taking anticoagulants undergo CT scanning in accordance with NICE guidelines, particularly when there are on-site CT scanner service issues.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure guideline-compliant CT scanning for patients with head injuries, especially those taking anti-coagulant medication, during on-site CT scanner service issues

    Wider context from the report

    “Please can you confirm what measures have been put in place to ensure patients with head injuries, especially those taking anti-coagulant medication, undergo CT scanning in accordance with NICE guidelines, particularly where there are service issues with CT scanners on site. ”

    Source location

    Edwin Hooper · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a CT scanner downtime escalation and dissemination process, supported by senior managers on call, out-of-hours protocol reminders, and posters in relevant clinical areas.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In summary the measures put in place are a robust escalation and dissemination plan for any occurrences of CT scanner downtime. This is backed up with senior managers on call and the out of hours team being sent and reminded on the CT scanner downtime protocol (embedded in the action plan). A poster has also been designed and displayed in all relevant clinical areas, which describes the process clearly.”

    Source location

    2018-0016-Response-by-Manchester-University-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 March 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide training on NICE guidelines for hospital-acquired head injuries and require all new starters to complete it during Trust induction.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Training on NICE guidelines for the management of hospital acquired head injuries has been undertaken, and is sustained with all new starters having to complete this on induction to the Trust.”

    Source location

    2018-0016-Response-by-Manchester-University-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 March 2018

    Open published response
  4. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Matthew Robert Edwards · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Matthew Robert Edwards was found dead at home on 25 September 2016 after attending hospital twice with chest pain and being referred for further tests. The report identified concerns about delayed dispatch of his discharge summary, failure to arrange follow-up investigations and appointments, and a delay in obtaining a CT angiogram due to a shortage of slots.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of timely CT angiogram slots

    Wider context from the report

    “3. There was a delay of at least 1 week for a CT angiogram. This was due to a shortage of slots. As a result the diagnosis of a possible embolism was not ruled out at an early stage. ”

    Source location

    Matthew Robert Edwards · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The CT angiogram delay did not reflect an acute clinical risk or an appointment shortage; urgent cases could be expedited.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It would appear that this issue may have arisen in part out of misunderstanding and which I hope I can clarify, and having confirmed the position with the Ambulatory Care and Radiology Teams.”

    Source location

    Matthew-Edwards-Response
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 July 2017

    Open published response
  5. West Sussex

    AI-generated summary

    Dennis Allen Teesdale · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Dennis Allen Teesdale underwent surgery including insertion of a PEG tube on 17 October 2016 and subsequently developed severe abdominal pain, multi-organ failure and septic shock. He was found to have peritonitis caused by leakage of bowel contents from the PEG tube passing through the bowel, and died on 20 October 2016. Concerns included the insertion and post-operative management of the PEG, delayed recognition and treatment of deterioration, delayed transfer, and limitations in specialist, diagnostic and laboratory services at Queen Victoria Hospital.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of out-of-hours radiology and on-site CT diagnostic capacity

    Wider context from the report

    “Similarly, there is no ‘out of hours’ radiology service and there is no CT scanner on site to assist in a diagnosis (which was required as part of the management guidelines prepared by QVH). ”

    Source location

    Dennis Allen Teesdale · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review options for providing CT scanning on site at QVH.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Urgent consideration is being given to options for CT provision at QVH. If it would be helpful we would be happy to update you on progress.”

    Source location

    Dennis-Teesdale-Response-1
    Page 6 · response
    Published 28 July 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor the trust’s progress on its business case for an on-site CT scanner through ongoing engagement.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of the trust’s action plan produced following the inquest into Mr Teesdale’s death, the trust has put forward a business case for a CT scanner on site. CQC will monitor the trust’s progress against this action as part of our ongoing engagement.”

    Source location

    2017-0202-Response-by-Care-Quality-Commission
    Page 10 · response
    Published 28 July 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    QVH disputes that its lack of on-site specialists prevents access to specialist opinion, because agreements with BSUH provide specialist advice and imaging.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Queen Victoria Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (“QVH”) is a specialist surgical hospital. We work in close partnership with other provider trusts both providing services on other sites and benefitting from the expertise of clinicians from other provider trusts who work on the Queen Victoria Hospital site.”

    Source location

    Dennis-Teesdale-Response-1
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 July 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NHS Improvement, NHS England, and the Care Quality Commission, working with the Trust and commissioners, were responsible for ensuring appropriate action.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Finally, I am satisfied that the regulators are alert to the risks you have highlighted, and it is for NHS Improvement, NHS England and the Care Quality Commission, working with the Trust and its commissioners, to ensure sufficient and appropriate action is taken to address the concerns raised. My officials have asked to be kept informed of developments.”

    Source location

    2017-0202-Response-by-Department-of-Health
    Page 3 · response
    Published 28 July 2017

    Open published response
  6. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Elaine Talbot · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Elaine Talbot had experienced headaches, nausea and vomiting for approximately three weeks before being taken to hospital on 31 August 2016, where she was diagnosed with migraine and discharged without a CT scan. She returned extremely unwell on 7 September 2016; a CT scan identified a large brain mass, and she died at Fairfield General Hospital the same day following a cardiac arrest. The principal concern was the lack of urgent direct access to CT scanning for primary-care clinicians, which could potentially affect outcomes for others.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of urgent direct access to CT scanning for primary care clinicians

    Wider context from the report

    “1. During the course of the evidence heard at inquest, the deceased's GP explained that he had no ability to make a direct urgent referral for urgent CT scanning– unlike other GPs in neighbouring towns. He considered that such accessibility would be beneficial. Whilst it is unlikely that earlier scanning in Mrs Talbot's case would have materially altered the very sad outcome, I am concerned that the lack of urgent direct access to CT scanning by clinicians working in primary care may potentially have a bearing upon the outcome for others in terms of prevention of future deaths. This appears to be a commissioning issue and that is why I am directing this PFD form to you. I further, your letter of the 7th April 2017 did not address the issue sufficiently. ”

    Source location

    Elaine Talbot · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. Black Country

    AI-generated summary

    Mrs Beryl Farmer · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mrs Farmer was admitted to hospital with severe hypocalcaemia and postural hypotension, fell from her bed and sustained facial and head injuries, and was discharged without a documented falls risk assessment. She was readmitted after developing headaches, was diagnosed with a subdural haemorrhage, later developed seizures, and died; concerns included inadequate falls-risk assessment, moving her to an unmonitored bay, limited neurological observations, and no CT head scan after the fall.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to perform CT head scans after significant facial and head bruising

    Wider context from the report

    “4. In addition no CT Head scan was performed despite evidence of significant bruising to her face and head. ”

    Source location

    Mrs Beryl Farmer · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Recheck head-injury and inpatient-falls policies against NICE and NPSA standards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have the necessary policies and procedures in place to manage Head Injuries which present in our Emergency Departments. Equally the management of patients who have fallen during an admission is detailed in policies and guidance for staff. These provide both advice and instruction to staff. Having had this material re-checked by our Medical Director and Chief Nurse, it meets both NICE and NPSA standards and remains suitable. It is available to staff”

    Source location

    2016-0420-Response-by-Sandwell-and-West-Birmingham-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 February 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Install the new electronic patient record to provide decision support and alerts reinforcing inpatient-falls and head-injury standards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are going to amend our inpatient falls policy. This will help us to ensure that post incident monitoring is undertaken. It will also more clearly link our standards in ED and on the wards. It is unacceptable that in this situation the requested monitoring was discontinued. Our use of Vital Pac and the upcoming installation of our new electronic patient record by Christmas 2017 will provide decision support and alerts to reinforce our standards. These changes will be complete by the end of March 2017.”

    Source location

    2016-0420-Response-by-Sandwell-and-West-Birmingham-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 February 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing head-injury and inpatient-falls policies meet NICE and NPSA standards and remain suitable for staff use.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have the necessary policies and procedures in place to manage Head Injuries which present in our Emergency Departments. Equally the management of patients who have fallen during an admission is detailed in policies and guidance for staff. These provide both advice and instruction to staff. Having had this material re-checked by our Medical Director and Chief Nurse, it meets both NICE and NPSA standards and remains suitable. It is available to staff”

    Source location

    2016-0420-Response-by-Sandwell-and-West-Birmingham-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 February 2017

    Open published response
  8. Cumbria

    AI-generated summary

    Mrs Constance Pridmore · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mrs Constance Pridmore, who was living independently, fell accidentally on 3 May 2015 and was admitted to hospital with pneumonia. She died on 7 May 2015 from a haemothorax associated with fractured ribs, during insertion of a chest drain. The principal concern was that rib fractures and the associated haemothorax were not identified promptly because her admission chest X-ray was not reviewed by a radiologist until after her death, amid a shortage of radiologists.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in timely radiologist review and reporting of diagnostic X-rays and CT scans

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) It was confirmed in evidence by Consultant Radiologist ████████ that: a) X-rays undertaken on admission to the Accident & Emergency ward at Furness General Hospital are not immediately reviewed by a radiologist, but are assessed by the requesting physician. b) The X-rays are eventually reviewed by a radiologist on a non-urgent basis when capacity in the system permits. In the case of Mrs Pridmore, her x-ray was reviewed on 11th May 2015, 8 days after being taken and 4 days after she had died. c) X-rays are not reviewed sooner by a radiologist due to a shortage of available radiologists within the Trust. (2) It was confirmed in evidence by Consultant Physician ████████ that: a) If Mrs Pridmore’s x-ray had been reviewed by a radiologist on 3rd May 2015, it is likely that the rib fractures and associated haemothorax would have been identified and that Mrs Pridmore would have been cared for differently. b) on the balance of probabilities, the outcome for Mrs Pridmore would have been the same due to her age and the nature of her injury. However the failure in identifying the fractures denied Mrs Pridmore the opportunity of a more appropriate course of treatment (e.g. pain management and symptom control) and the possibility, all be it remote, of a different outcome (3) It was confirmed in evidence by independent Consultant Radiologist, ████████ ████████ that: a) the rib fractures were only discretely visible on the x-ray and would have required a trained radiologist to identify them b) The shortage of radiologists within the Morecambe Bay trust which prevented Mrs Pridmore’s x-ray from being reviewed by a radiologist sooner is reflective of a critical shortage of radiologists in the U.K. c) There are presently approximately 400 vacant consultant radiologist posts unfilled in the U.K. d) the target set in ████████2013 report entitled “NHS Services, Seven days a Week” (Paper NHS121315) for urgent x-rays of inpatients to be completed (including the reporting by a radiologist) within 12 hours is far from being achieved both locally by Morecambe Bay Trust, but also nationally by all Health Trusts. This is due in part to a general increase in the use of scans and x-rays as diagnostic aids, but mainly due to the acute shortage of radiologist who are available and trained to interpret the relevant data accurately and in a timely manner. The Keogh targets whilst intended to become reality by the end of 2016/17 are becoming a more distant ideal than a realistically approaching target. It is probable that current delays on both a local and national basis in obtaining in a timely manner, accurate radiologist reports of x-rays and CT scans taken for diagnostic purposes, creates a foreseeable risk that further deaths may well arise as a consequence. Locally, a review of your procedures with regard to the assessment of x-rays is required and nationally, a review into the implementation of the recommendations of the Keogh report is likely to be necessary. ”

    Source location

    Mrs Constance Pridmore · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Appoint three radiologists to increase reporting capacity.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Clearly recruitment is central to developing further capacity and the Trust has made progress and appointed three radiologists in the past 12 months with ongoing recruitment efforts, including international recruitment.”

    Source location

    2016-0491-Response-by-University-Hospitals-of-Morecambe-Bay-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 May 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue recruitment, including international recruitment, to develop reporting capacity.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Dalton Review reported that the UK has around 48 trained radiologists per million population. This figure has remained static for the last five years and represents half the total in other EU countries. The paper considers different ways of working in terms of outsourcing, skill mix and the use of technology to overcome the challenge and UHMB has already implemented some of these ideas. In the UK, no appointment was made to 41% of unfilled consultant posts advertised and the North West showed a higher vacancy rate than other regions. This reflects the experience in UHMB where there are currently 5 vacancies, based on workload calculations from 2011, since which time CT and MR have both doubled in volume and increased in complexity.”

    Source location

    2016-0491-Response-by-University-Hospitals-of-Morecambe-Bay-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 May 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Offer additional programmed activities and payment to consultants reporting work beyond contracted hours.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Additional programmed activities and payment are on offer to substantive consultants to report additional work beyond their normal employed hours”

    Source location

    2016-0491-Response-by-University-Hospitals-of-Morecambe-Bay-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 May 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide ad hoc reporting support through eight honorary contracts with external radiologists.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• 8 honorary contracts with external radiologists who provide ad hoc support”

    Source location

    2016-0491-Response-by-University-Hospitals-of-Morecambe-Bay-NHS-Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 May 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Explore home reporting with the new PACS to improve recruitment and retention opportunities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Home reporting to be explored with the advent of new PACS from September 2016, which should improve recruitment and retention opportunities”

    Source location

    2016-0491-Response-by-University-Hospitals-of-Morecambe-Bay-NHS-Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 May 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Roll out voice recognition technology across radiology staff to speed report turnaround.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Voice recognition technology has been rolled out across all radiology staff, streamlining the process and speeding up report turnaround times”

    Source location

    2016-0491-Response-by-University-Hospitals-of-Morecambe-Bay-NHS-Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 May 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient radiology reporting capacity prevents all imaging studies from being reported promptly, reflecting a wider national radiologist shortage.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The number and range of imaging investigations performed per day varies but the reporting workload is broadly predictable and University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust (UHMB) does not have sufficient reporting capacity to promptly report all the images that are acquired. As identified in your report, there is a shortage of radiologists and this is reflective of a national problem. The Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) has produced several snapshot surveys demonstrating the scale of the issue. The most recent RCR survey (February 2016) showed that in fact, UHMB was in the upper quartile with no studies >1 month.”

    Source location

    2016-0491-Response-by-University-Hospitals-of-Morecambe-Bay-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 May 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The existing scope of referrer evaluation and its standard operating procedure are considered reasonable and safe, so wider expansion is not preferred.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A small number of studies are considered suitable for 'referrer evaluation' and the opinion documented will be that of the referrer, with an option to ask for the film to be reviewed and reported by a radiologist. In these cases there would be no formal report issued by a radiologist. Examples of x-rays that are considered suitable for referrer evaluation at UHMB include x-rays of the teeth reviewed by a dentist and follow up x-rays of healing fractures in adults reviewed by an orthopaedic surgeon.”

    Source location

    2016-0491-Response-by-University-Hospitals-of-Morecambe-Bay-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 May 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    A prioritisation flow diagram is not being constructed because clinical complexity across modalities does not permit reliable simplification.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The waiting images are actively managed by a radiographic manager who will also send work to outsourcing companies as required.”

    Source location

    2016-0491-Response-by-University-Hospitals-of-Morecambe-Bay-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 May 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Responsibility for staffing levels and skill mix rests with individual NHS Trust boards, considering local factors and safe-care requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Responsibility for staffing rests, as it has always done, with Trust boards. Trusts should focus on the numbers and skill mix needed to deliver quality care, patient safety and efficiency, taking into account local factors such as acuity and case mix.”

    Source location

    2016-0491-Response-by-Department-of-Health
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 May 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Urgent and emergency care networks are responsible for developing clinical pathways, designating services and monitoring performance and access.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England reports that the Urgent and Emergency Care Review arising from Sir Bruce Keogh’s work is now in its implementation phase. Key to implementation is the development of urgent and emergency care (UEC) networks. In June 2015, NHS England published guidance for what were then emerging networks titled Role and Establishment of Urgent and Emergency Care Networks and in October a total of 23 UEC networks across the four regions of NHS England were confirmed.”

    Source location

    2016-0491-Response-by-Department-of-Health
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 May 2016

    Open published response
  9. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Marjorie Booth · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Marjorie Booth fell at home on 21 September 2015 and was initially discharged from hospital after an X-ray failed to identify an impacted hip fracture. The fracture was identified by CT scan the following day, but she subsequently deteriorated and died on 19 October 2015; the report raises concern about the apparent policy of not routinely performing CT scans in such circumstances.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to routinely perform CT scans in circumstances where impacted or undisplaced fractures may be present

    Wider context from the report

    “1. I was told that a CT scan is not routinely asked for in these circumstances, even though it is really the only way to be sure that there is no impacted or un-displaced fracture, because of the risk of exposing the patient to additional levels of radiation. The doctor giving this evidence agreed with me that the minimal risk of the radiation (in a patient over 90 years old) did not compare with the considerable risk of missing such fractures. 2. Can the Trust explain why there is apparently a policy not to perform scans in such circumstances and whether in fact this policy could be amended. ”

    Source location

    Marjorie Booth · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Clifford Irwin Crofts · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Clifford Irwin Crofts, who had Parkinson’s disease and aspiration difficulties, was admitted to hospital and underwent insertion of a radiologically inserted gastrostomy tube on 19 September 2014. He experienced acute pain after feeding began, but there were delays in escalating his care, obtaining a CT scan and carrying out surgery; he subsequently developed respiratory difficulties and died on 10 October 2014. The substantive concerns included failure to follow the RIG care plan, difficulties escalating care, delays in obtaining urgent CT imaging, and weekend staffing levels.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays and restricted access in obtaining urgent CT scans

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) There were considerable difficulties obtaining a CT scan on Sunday, 21 September 2014. This was partly because it was not actioned at 16.00, when requested. After 17.00 on the weekend the request had to be made by a consultant to an outside provider Medica who read the scans when no-one is available at the hospital. It appears that junior doctors can now request CT scans and that a new arrangement is being put in place to obtain urgent CT scans in cases of suspected peritonitis. The SI report recommends that guidance relating to CT scanning on the trust intranet should be reviewed to clarify the process for arranging investigations and be made available as part of the induction process for junior doctors and on the ward areas, for other staff to access. I was informed this has not yet been actioned. ”

    Source location

    Clifford Irwin Crofts · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide revised out-of-hours CT-requesting guidance in full and abbreviated forms on the intranet and through junior-doctor induction.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• There is a revised guidance document available for doctors who request CT scanning out of hours (Mon – Fri 20:00 to 08:00 and Sat, Sun & Bank holidays 17:00 to 09:00).”

    Source location

    Clifford-CROFTS-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 February 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remove routine Medica-radiologist discussion or direct consultant involvement for specified urgent CT pathways, while retaining radiologist discussion for other out-of-hours scans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Scans for patients on the following pathways no longer require a discussion with the Medica radiologist”

    Source location

    Clifford-CROFTS-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 February 2016

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026