Recurring concern

Failure to secure and control medication

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 14 Mar 2014•Latest report 17 Dec 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of the medication-security and control process, including medication brought into care, patients’ own medication, prescribed medication and medication held in healthcare or custodial settings, where the concern is preventing unauthorised access, trading, theft, overdose or misuse.

Not included

  • Excludes medication prescribing, review or quantity decisions unless the report directly concerns securing or controlling the medication.
  • Excludes generic ward, premises or physical-access security concerns that are not specifically about medication.
  • Excludes medication information, counselling or handover failures unless they directly result in inadequate medication security or control.
  • Excludes unrelated clinical governance, staffing or documentation deficiencies that are not tied to medication security or control.
Reports
30

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
34

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
62

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

HM Prison and Probation Service6
Care UK3
Department of Health and Social Care3
Ministry of Justice3
Care Quality Commission2
Guys Marsh Prison2
NHS England2
Office of the Chief Coroner2
Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs1
APEX Prime Care1
Barts Health NHS Trust1
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust1
Cardiff & Vale University LHB1
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust1
City and County Healthcare Group Limited1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Mid Kent and Medway

    AI-generated summary

    Idris HABIB · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Idris Habib was found suspended in his cell at HMP Swaleside after incidents involving self-harm, a cell fire and statements that he was being bullied and wanted to kill himself. The inquest concluded that he took his own life by hanging, although his intention was unclear. Concerns included medication from a previous occupant being found in the cell, a disconnect between local policy and training on roll checks, and the need to ensure welfare checks were conducted and documented.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to remove previous occupants' medication from cells

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Medication from the previous occupant of cell B1-18 was found in the cell following the death of Mr Habib ”

    Source location

    Idris HABIB · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce cell-clearance procedures, including medication security, intelligence reporting, and documented pre-occupancy checks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In November 2021, HMP Swaleside issued a notice reminding staff of the process to be followed when undertaking cell clearance checks to ensure that any items belonging to previous occupants are removed before the next prisoner is moved to that cell. Any medication found should be placed into a security bag and an intelligence report must be submitted. The notice also reminded staff that a pre-occupancy check should be undertaken and documented before the cell is allocated to another prisoner. This process was also reinforced during staff briefings.”

    Source location

    2022-0020-Response-from-HMPPS_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 January 2022

    Open published response
  2. Gwent

    AI-generated summary

    Ian Anthony Charles Miller · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ian Anthony Charles Miller was serving a term at HMP Usk and died by suicide in the prison on 21 September 2019 after being told he could not live at the family home or with his father-in-law, could not have unsupervised contact with his children, and might be homeless. The report raised concerns that prisoners were trading prescribed medication at HMP Usk and that unprescribed medication was being ingested, putting other prisoners’ lives at risk.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to secure and control prisoners’ prescribed medication

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The management of medication prescribed to prisoners. At post mortem examination the toxicologist determined that there were a number of drugs in Ian’s blood and urine that he had not been prescribed. The court was informed that at HMP Usk, all prisoners are required to be capable of managing their own medication. The medications are not kept in a locked facility. The evidence provided clearly indicated that prisoners were trading prescribed medication which had become a form of currency within the prison. Ian’s former cellmate indicated this practice was rife and indeed Ian bought medication from other prisoners. Evidence was heard from the Governor / Head of Safety at HMP Usk who informed the court that he was not aware of this practice, and it appears this was also not known by the prison officers. The court was informed that there is a system of randomised checks in place within the prison to attempt to determine whether prisoners are appropriately managing their medication, however prisoners have clearly found ways around this. Whilst the ingestion of unprescribed medication did not contribute to Ian’s death, this practice, if left unchecked, clearly puts the lives of other prisoners at risk in the future. ”

    Source location

    Ian Anthony Charles Miller · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ineffective randomised checks of prisoners’ medication management

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The management of medication prescribed to prisoners. At post mortem examination the toxicologist determined that there were a number of drugs in Ian’s blood and urine that he had not been prescribed. The court was informed that at HMP Usk, all prisoners are required to be capable of managing their own medication. The medications are not kept in a locked facility. The evidence provided clearly indicated that prisoners were trading prescribed medication which had become a form of currency within the prison. Ian’s former cellmate indicated this practice was rife and indeed Ian bought medication from other prisoners. Evidence was heard from the Governor / Head of Safety at HMP Usk who informed the court that he was not aware of this practice, and it appears this was also not known by the prison officers. The court was informed that there is a system of randomised checks in place within the prison to attempt to determine whether prisoners are appropriately managing their medication, however prisoners have clearly found ways around this. Whilst the ingestion of unprescribed medication did not contribute to Ian’s death, this practice, if left unchecked, clearly puts the lives of other prisoners at risk in the future. ”

    Source location

    Ian Anthony Charles Miller · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue staff guidance on detecting, recording and reporting prescribed-medication trading.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to ensure that staff are aware of this issue and the risk that prisoners trading prescribed medications presents, the Deputy Governor issued guidance to staff in January 2022 highlighting what they must look out for, and the importance of recording any instances of this immediately including informing the healthcare provider. This notice will be re-issued annually to continually raise staff awareness and ensure that new staff are also informed.”

    Source location

    2022-0001-Response-from-HMPPS_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 10 January 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reissue medication-trading guidance annually to maintain staff awareness and inform new staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to ensure that staff are aware of this issue and the risk that prisoners trading prescribed medications presents, the Deputy Governor issued guidance to staff in January 2022 highlighting what they must look out for, and the importance of recording any instances of this immediately including informing the healthcare provider. This notice will be re-issued annually to continually raise staff awareness and ensure that new staff are also informed.”

    Source location

    2022-0001-Response-from-HMPPS_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 10 January 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor and collate medication-trading intelligence for consideration at weekly staff security briefings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Any intelligence received about instances of prisoners trading medication will continue to be monitored and collated by the security department and considered during the weekly staff security briefings to ensure that all staff are aware of emerging trends and risks.”

    Source location

    2022-0001-Response-from-HMPPS_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 10 January 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Apply detailed security risk assessments to prisoners working in the recycling department.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Increased measures have been introduced in areas of high risk across the prison, this includes the recycling department which now has more detailed security risk assessments for all prisoners that work there, due to them potentially coming into contact with discarded medications. Amnesty bins have also been added to the wings to ensure that medications may be disposed of correctly, when required.”

    Source location

    2022-0001-Response-from-HMPPS_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 10 January 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Install amnesty bins on prison wings for correct disposal of medications.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Increased measures have been introduced in areas of high risk across the prison, this includes the recycling department which now has more detailed security risk assessments for all prisoners that work there, due to them potentially coming into contact with discarded medications. Amnesty bins have also been added to the wings to ensure that medications may be disposed of correctly, when required.”

    Source location

    2022-0001-Response-from-HMPPS_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 10 January 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct monthly random medication checks covering 10% of the prison population and address discrepancies through medication reviews.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Random medication checks have been increased to 10% of the prison population and are conducted monthly by both healthcare and prison staff. The checks are to ensure that a prisoner has the correct in-possession medication in the right quantities and any discrepancies are immediately addressed through medication reviews.”

    Source location

    2022-0001-Response-from-HMPPS_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 10 January 2022

    Open published response
  3. West London

    AI-generated summary

    Kumbulani MTOMBENI · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kumbulani Mtombeni was found deceased at his home on 25 January 2021, with evidence indicating that he intended to take his own life; the inquest conclusion was suicide and the recorded cause of death was methadone toxicity. The principal concerns were how methadone prescribed to another person came into his possession, whether medication audits identified missing medication, and his access to residents’ prescribed medicines through his work as a senior carer.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to control staff access to residents' prescribed medication

    Wider context from the report

    “In the deceased's possession was a ████████ of methadone in the name of ████████. Evidence was given at inquest that Mr ████████ was one of your residents until he died last summer. Mr Mtombeni was a member of your staff and at times had worked as a senior carer and had responsibility for and access to the residents prescribed medications. (1) Can you explain how the methadone was in Mr Mtombeni's possession? (2) Were any audits performed that demonstrated missing medication and if so, what actions were taken? (3) What actions will now be taken in the light of the findings at inquest? ”

    Source location

    Kumbulani MTOMBENI · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a robust action plan covering controlled-drug training and ongoing medication monitoring for auditors and managers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Due to our findings a robust action plan was developed based on lessons learnt to ensure all auditors and managers understood their obligations under CQC regulations in respect of administration of controlled drugs including training and ongoing monitoring.”

    Source location

    2021-0272-Response-from-Care-Outlook_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 August 2021

    Open published response
  4. Stoke-on-Trent and North Staffordshire

    AI-generated summary

    Geoffrey Peter Banks · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Geoffrey Peter Banks, aged 64, took 44 co-codamol tablets after pulling open a locked medicine cupboard at his assisted accommodation on 1 January 2020. He was admitted to hospital and died on 8 January 2020 from an acute heart attack; the overdose contributed to his death, although it was not possible to determine whether it was accidental or deliberate. Concerns were raised about the lack of safe medication storage for residents needing supervision and about the apparent investigation being perfunctory and conducted by an untrained staff member.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of safe medication storage for residents requiring supervision

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The deceased resided at Oak Priory and was the tenant of a privately rented flat in a scheme from a housing provider. He was on a care package provided by Comfort Call under a contract from Stoke on Trent Council. He received visit four times per day principally to administer medication. The medicine was kept in a locked kitchen cupboard in his flat. He had been identified as not being able to manage his own medication. The tenant was easily able to pull open the cupboard door and the barrel of the lock fell out. He overdosed on medication. There appears to be no system of safe storage in place where a resident has been identified as being in need of supervision with medication. (2)The apparent investigation into the incident was perfunctory and carried out by an untrained member of staff. ”

    Source location

    Geoffrey Peter Banks · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Raise safeguarding concerns where individuals may be at risk from accessing their medicines.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. Raising a safeguarding concern where there is a perceived risk that an individual may be at risk from gaining access to their own medicines; and”

    Source location

    2020-0256-Response-from-Comfort-Call-Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 December 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the standard Extra Care Scheme protocols template to consider secure medicines storage in tenants’ flats.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Point 2, however, can absolutely be incorporated into our standard procedures, which include setting up written protocols with partner housing providers addressing the whole range of joint working arrangements in each ECS.”

    Source location

    2020-0256-Response-from-Comfort-Call-Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 December 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require Extra Care Scheme managers to review whether secure medicines storage should be raised with housing providers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our plan for organisational learning is, therefore, to review our standard ECS protocols template to consider the question of secure medicines storage in each flat and to require all our ECS managers to undertake a review at their schemes to consider whether this issue should be raised with the housing provider. We will complete this by the end of March 2021.”

    Source location

    2020-0256-Response-from-Comfort-Call-Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 December 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the specification for lockable medication cupboards in all Extra Care Housing Scheme contracts.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At that meeting on 22nd December 2020, we discussed and agreed the following actions:”

    Source location

    2020-0256-Response-from-Adult-Social-Care-Health-Integration-and-Wellbeing-Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 December 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review care plans for tenants unable to manage their medication, including the risk of deliberate or accidental overdose.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Action | Who is responsible | Target Completion Date Specification of lockable cupboards in contracts of all Extra Care Housing Schemes to be reviewed | Stoke on Trent City Council | 28/02/21 All lockable cupboards in PFI Extra Care Housing Schemes to be inspected to check on general state of repair – If the inspection identifies any faults then these should be urgently rectified/repaired | Your Housing Group | 28/02/21 Reviews to be undertaken of care plans for all tenants in receipt of care who are unable to manage their own medication:”

    Source location

    2020-0256-Response-from-Adult-Social-Care-Health-Integration-and-Wellbeing-Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 December 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Consider installing more secure medication storage where care-plan reviews identify it as required.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Action | Who is responsible | Target Completion Date Specification of lockable cupboards in contracts of all Extra Care Housing Schemes to be reviewed | Stoke on Trent City Council | 28/02/21 All lockable cupboards in PFI Extra Care Housing Schemes to be inspected to check on general state of repair – If the inspection identifies any faults then these should be urgently rectified/repaired | Your Housing Group | 28/02/21 Reviews to be undertaken of care plans for all tenants in receipt of care who are unable to manage their own medication:”

    Source location

    2020-0256-Response-from-Adult-Social-Care-Health-Integration-and-Wellbeing-Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 December 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Send all home-care and Extra Care providers a request to review medication storage for customers unable to manage their own medication.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Consider installation of more secure storage where required | Stoke on Trent City Council/Comfort Call; Your Housing Group | 28/02/201 Communication to be sent to all home care and extra care providers requesting that medication storage is reviewed for those customers that are unable to manage their own medication. | Stoke on Trent City Council | 31/01/2021”

    Source location

    2020-0256-Response-from-Adult-Social-Care-Health-Integration-and-Wellbeing-Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 December 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The risk of medicine-related self-harm was not reasonably foreseeable because there was no previous indication of overdose, self-harm or medicine access attempts.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In Mr Banks’s case, however, there were no obvious signs that the ECS was an inappropriate care setting. He had no previous history of overdose or any other form of self-harm, nor of trying to access his medicines and as such, there was no indication that he was at risk in that way. Had there been any indication that he was a danger to himself or others, we would certainly have raised this as a safeguarding matter, which may well have led to the Council considering alternative accommodation for him.”

    Source location

    2020-0256-Response-from-Comfort-Call-Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 December 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Medicines could not lawfully be removed from the tenant’s flat under the provider’s care registration and the independent-living model.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst an ECS like Oak Priory looks superficially like a residential home, it is in fact nothing of the kind for the purposes of managing and delivering care. For example, in a residential or nursing home, medication would typically be stored and dispensed centrally by staff, and centralised records maintained. Such an arrangement at Oak Priory would clearly have prevented Mr Banks from accessing his medicines unsupervised, but it could not be done lawfully in an ECS under Comfort Call’s CQC registration because his medicines belonged to him and it was therefore required that they remain in his home (i.e. his flat).”

    Source location

    2020-0256-Response-from-Comfort-Call-Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 December 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The care provider has no remit or capability to mandate, purchase or install secure fixtures in tenants’ flats.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “- Primary control of the fabric of the building, including fixtures and fittings within each tenant’s home, rests with the tenant and the housing provider, not the care provider;”

    Source location

    2020-0256-Response-from-Comfort-Call-Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 December 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The housing provider and commissioning authority are responsible for deciding and implementing fixture changes at the scheme.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Unfortunately, as noted above, Comfort Call has no remit or capability to mandate, purchase or install fittings and fixtures in flats at Oak Priory or any other ECS. We are entirely dependent on the housing provider and commissioning authority in that regard. We could, however, at least bring our influence to bear in that regard, by:”

    Source location

    2020-0256-Response-from-Comfort-Call-Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 December 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Medication cupboards met contractual specifications, and co-codamol required no additional secure storage because it was not a controlled drug.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• It was confirmed that the medication cupboards conformed with the specification set out in the contract that the City Council has with the provider.”

    Source location

    2020-0256-Response-from-Adult-Social-Care-Health-Integration-and-Wellbeing-Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 December 2020

    Open published response
  5. County Durham and Darlington

    AI-generated summary

    Claire RICHARDS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Claire Richards had a history of drugs misuse and mental health issues and died at home after snorting illegally dealt pregabalin and buprenorphine, becoming unresponsive despite emergency services being summoned. The principal concern was the availability of prescription drugs in large quantities for illegal dealing to vulnerable people and the leakage of prescription medication from lawful dispensing into criminal hands.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to prevent prescription medication leakage from the lawful dispensing process into criminal hands

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) This case involves a death resulting from illegally dealt prescription drugs. It is of increasing concern that prescription drugs are available in vast quantities for illegal dealing to vulnerable people. (2) What steps are projected, or are actually in the pipe line, for stemming the leakage of prescription medication out of the lawful dispensing process into criminal hands? ”

    Source location

    Claire RICHARDS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    PHE and ACMD are the appropriate bodies to address concerns about prescription-drug misuse and medicine availability.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The report outlined matters of concern including the availability of prescription medicines to vulnerable people illegally, or outside of the healthcare system and controls on availability. For this reason we believe it would be appropriate for Public Health England (PHE) and the Advisory Council for the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD), who both have roles around the misuse of drugs to be aware of this report.”

    Source location

    2020-0253-Response-from-Royal-Pharmaceutical-Society-Redacted.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 December 2020

    Open published response
  6. London (West)

    AI-generated summary

    Amir Siman-Tov · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Amir Siman-Tov died at Colnbrook Immigration Removal Centre on 17 February 2016 after taking an overdose of codeine. The concerns included inconsistent involvement of healthcare staff in the ACDT self-harm reduction process, inconsistent medication checks, inadequate hospital discharge information and handover, insufficient monitoring after his return, and shortcomings in the emergency response.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inconsistent checks that detainees swallow issued medication

    Wider context from the report

    “5. Mr Siman-Tov expressed that he might save his medication and take as an overdose. There was conflicting evidence as to the rigour of the checks to ensure detainees had swallowed issued medicine at the time of dispensing and the nurses who gave evidence described different practices of observation. Mr Siman-Tov was able to collect sufficient codeine ultimately to be able to end his life. This lack of consistency of checks puts detainee’s at risk. ”

    Source location

    Amir Siman-Tov · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. Oxfordshire

    AI-generated summary

    Daniel Davey · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Daniel Davey, aged 21, died at John Radcliffe Hospital on 12 January 2018 after deliberately overdosing on propranolol in his cell at HMP Bullingdon Prison. The report raises concerns about healthcare attendance at ACCT reviews, risk assessments and management of in-possession medication, cell searches, and failures to share and act on information relevant to his safety.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate cell searching and collection of in-possession medication after a change of risk

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Reviews of ‘in possession’ medication risk assessments – The second concern also relates to prison and healthcare. In particular, it relates to a prisoner placed on an ACCT. I heard evidence that, initially, a template is used at the reception healthcare screen to determine if medication should be held in possession or not. I was told that, now, this is subsequently reviewed by the prescriber and, on opening an ACCT, there is an automatic review of the risk assessment in accordance with CUK’s new policy. In the case of Mr Davey, there was an initial risk assessment at reception and he was deemed suitable for in possession medication, but this was not reviewed when he was subsequently placed on the 2 ACCT documents in December and January or when he disclosed to a mental health nurse on 29 December that he had a plan to kill himself. I understand that new systems are in place (with healthcare) but it would be reassuring if there is a system of audit to ensure compliance, namely, that the in possession risk assessments are reviewed. I appreciate a review might not necessarily result in medication being taken away. I also appreciate this is a difficult area in view of patient confidentiality and, of course, the danger that a prisoners physical or mental health could be put at risk if medication is taken away. A related concern is the fact that prison officers did not appear to have in mind the risks associated with in possession medication. It appeared to be disregarded because it was information that was not available to them and it was therefore deemed a matter for healthcare. I am concerned that there is a danger in leaving the issue of in possession medication solely to healthcare. There could be a time delay of several hours or even longer between a prisoner having a mental health crisis and healthcare involvement/reassessment. It appears there needs to be joint liaison between the ACCT case manager and healthcare and a plan to intervene and remove medicine if necessary. This leads to a final related concern. There is the question of cell searches for stockpiled medication and the collection of properly held in possession medication when there is a change of risk such as an ACCT document being opened. I did not hear much evidence about practice or policies relating to searching and potentially removing medication. This is clearly a task that rests with prison staff and it would be helpful to have further information about this. ”

    Source location

    Daniel Davey · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind staff to update medication-in-possession risk assessments during medication reviews so changes feed into ACCT information for dispensing and prison staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Response: As was stated at the inquest, our prescriber’s always record on the prescription form whether the medication they are prescribing should be held in possession. We have reminded our staff to ensure when they are reviewing any medication that they, where necessary, include an update of the ‘Medication In possession risk assessment’ which goes onto SystmOne, which in turn will feed into the ACCT. This ensures that both dispensing staff and prison staff are aware of any changes and respond accordingly, this will include the removal of any medicines currently being held.”

    Source location

    2019-0267-Response-by-Midlands-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 October 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct random medication spot checks and review or remove in-possession status when discrepancies or patient-safety concerns arise.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I would like to provide assurance that random spot checks are undertaken to support concordance and reduce the risk of diversion or stockpiling for overdose.”

    Source location

    2019-0267-Response-by-Care-UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 October 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue guidance requiring ACCT case managers to discuss in-possession medication routinely and complete risk assessments with healthcare input.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your second concern relates to reviews of in possession medication risk assessments. I understand Care UK and Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust will be replying to you separately on this point. At Bullingdon, if the ACCT case manager is concerned about the immediate welfare of an individual they are required to conduct a review immediately, and to ensure that there is healthcare input to that review. The prison has issued guidance to all case managers stating that in possession medication is one of the topics that should routinely be discussed in ACCT reviews, and that a risk assessment must be conducted, informed by the advice of healthcare staff. If this advice is not immediately available then ACCT case managers can at their discretion remove in possession medication until they can confirm that it is safe for the prisoner to continue to have it in their own possession.”

    Source location

    2019-0267-Response-by-HM-Prison-Probation-Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 October 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Distribute a safety briefing on in-possession medication risks and required action during fabric checks or cell searches to all staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Lastly, you asked about the policy for cell searches for stockpiled medication. The safer custody department has distributed a safety briefing on in possession medication to all staff to ensure that they are aware of the risks and know what action to take if they discover unusual amounts of in possession medication when conducting fabric checks or cell searches. In future, the issue of stockpiled medication will also be covered in the local ACCT case manager training so that, when immediate actions plans are completed, consideration is given to the need to check for and remove in possession medication as a temporary measure before a full assessment and review has taken place.”

    Source location

    2019-0267-Response-by-HM-Prison-Probation-Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 October 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Include stockpiled medication and temporary removal considerations in future local ACCT case-manager training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Lastly, you asked about the policy for cell searches for stockpiled medication. The safer custody department has distributed a safety briefing on in possession medication to all staff to ensure that they are aware of the risks and know what action to take if they discover unusual amounts of in possession medication when conducting fabric checks or cell searches. In future, the issue of stockpiled medication will also be covered in the local ACCT case manager training so that, when immediate actions plans are completed, consideration is given to the need to check for and remove in possession medication as a temporary measure before a full assessment and review has taken place.”

    Source location

    2019-0267-Response-by-HM-Prison-Probation-Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 October 2019

    Open published response
  8. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Cady James Stewart · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Cady James Stewart was found dead at her home on 3 June 2018, and the post-mortem found a fatal combination of prescribed drugs. The concern was that opiate medication prescribed to her mother for palliative care remained in Cady Stewart’s possession after her mother’s death, including after Cady had attempted to take her own life, and was used with her own medication.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to remove palliative opiate medication from a bereaved person’s possession

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The inquest heard that Cady Stewart’s mother had died a few months before from terminal cancer. Whilst her mother was on palliative care she had been prescribed a significant amount of opiate drugs. After her death the medication was not removed by the nursing team and remained in Cady Stewart’s possession. It remained in her possession even though she attempted to take her life immediately after her mother’s death. She used that in combination with medication prescribed to her to take her life. ”

    Source location

    Cady James Stewart · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Joseph Page · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Joseph Page, who had significant co-morbidities, was admitted to hospital on 15 March 2018 and died on 23 March 2018 after deliberately taking a mixed overdose of prescription medication. His medication was accessible and unsecured, contrary to hospital policies. The report identified concerns about the storage and handling of patients’ own drugs in the Emergency Department and on Ward B5, and about the implementation and communication of revised policies.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to secure patients’ PODS while awaiting ward admission

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) In the Emergency Department, and whilst patients were awaiting admission to a Ward, their PODS remained with them unsecured in a bay (or similar). Exposing the medication to potential further use/mis-use by the patient, another patient or relative, or theft and mis-use. ”

    Source location

    Joseph Page · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Dorset

    AI-generated summary

    Andrew Craig · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Andrew Craig, a serving prisoner at HMP Guys Marsh, was found collapsed and unresponsive in his cell on 16 September 2016. The inquest concluded that the medical cause of death was the toxic effects of buprenorphine and diazepam, with a conclusion of misadventure. The principal concerns were illicit drug use at the prison and weaknesses in the dispensing and monitoring of medication, which could facilitate the redistribution of prescription drugs.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to monitor whether prisoners swallow dispensed medication

    Wider context from the report

    “ii. Evidence was given by the Head of Healthcare, ████████ that there are 3 allocated times during the day when Prisoners collect medication. During these times, there are around 70 prisoners collecting their medication. The room can be quite chaotic and loud, and prisoners can be in close contact clambering over each other. She described the hatch as overloaded. This is an ideal scenario to pass medication to one another without detection. iii. In addition, during the routine medication dispensing, there are no checks done to confirm that Prisoners have actually swallowed the medication. This can allow them to retain the medication for redistribution. iv. At the last inspection by Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons these issues were raised and attempts have been made to improve the situation. There are now Prison Officers at the Healthcare department during dispensing times, but usually only one Officer stood in the room where the medication hatch is located and another outside the room. Despite these changes, Mrs Jameson advised that the arrangements at medication dispensing times continue to be an ongoing problem that facilitates the illicit supply of prescription drugs in the Prison. She advised that the process could be made safer and more secure. Similar concerns were also raised by one of the Prison GPs ████████ ████████ v. Mrs Jameson also gave evidence that the Prison is overwhelmed with illicit drug use, particularly psychoactive substances and that the Healthcare team receive 3 emergency calls a week at HMP Guys Marsh to assist in resuscitating Prisoners from drug overdoses. 2. I have concerns with regard to the following: i. There is an ongoing problem with the use of drugs, both prescription and illicit drugs such as psychoactive substances, at HMP Guys Marsh and there have been a number of recent deaths either confirmed to be, or suspected to be, due to drug use. ii. Although the Prison are working to address this, further consideration needs to be given to restricting the supply of such drugs. I would request that to prevent a future death at HMP Guys Marsh, there is a review of the policies and procedures by both the Prison Staff and the Healthcare Staff regarding the dispensing and monitoring of the medication administered at the medication hatch to ensure compliance and reduce distribution to others. ”

    Source location

    Andrew Craig · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 5 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate CCTV surveillance and follow the adjudication process when medication diversion is observed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are aware that medication is diverted from the Healthcare department and we have already implemented a number of factors that will help to reduce this.”

    Source location

    2018-0194-Response-by-Care-UK_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 10 July 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Have prison staff support healthcare staff when prisoners may not have swallowed medication or are otherwise non-compliant.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Having seen the response from Care UK I understand that healthcare staff will not be checking each person’s mouth to ensure that they have swallowed their medication. However, prison staff will be present to deal with any issues and will support healthcare staff when they have reason to believe that a prisoner has not swallowed medication or is being otherwise non-compliant.”

    Source location

    2018-0194-Response-by-HM-Prison-Probabtion-Service
    Page 3 · response
    Published 10 July 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Universal swallowing checks are not considered practical or appropriate because queues, the physical wall and confidentiality prevent reliable checks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst we understand the diversion of medication happens we do not think it is acceptable to ask for visual evidence each time. We do not have the ability within the medication queues to ensure prisoners show us they have swallowed their medication. We have a physical wall between medical staff and the patient and would not be able to ensure this happens. Due to confidentiality reasons we do not feel it would be appropriate for officers to check patient’s mouths either. However, healthcare staff do ask to check a patient’s mouth if we have reason to believe that a patient has diverted their medication.”

    Source location

    2018-0194-Response-by-Care-UK_Redacted
    Page 4 · response
    Published 10 July 2018

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026