Recurring concern

Insufficient acute hospital capacity for patients requiring admission

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 11 May 2016•Latest report 3 Nov 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes deficiencies in the availability or capacity of acute hospital facilities or beds that prevent or delay admission or treatment of patients requiring acute care.

Not included

  • Excludes critical-care, psychiatric, mental-health, detoxification or other specialist bed-capacity concerns unless the report explicitly concerns general acute hospital admission capacity.
  • Excludes failures limited to admission procedures, escalation or bed-management policies when acute capacity itself is not deficient.
  • Excludes delays in treatment or transfer after an appropriate acute hospital bed or facility is available.
  • Excludes generic hospital staffing or equipment shortages unless they directly leave acute admission patients without an available acute facility or bed.
Reports
8

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
10

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2016–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
49

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care6
NHS England2
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board2
Care Quality Commission1
Daughter of the deceased1
Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership1
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust1
Health Services Safety Investigations Body1
Hull Royal Infirmary1
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust1
Office of the Chief Coroner1
Powys Teaching Local Health Board1
South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust1
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. East Riding and Hull

    AI-generated summary

    Kathleen Rose WARD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kathleen Rose WARD, who had terminal mesothelioma, was admitted to Hull Royal Infirmary’s emergency department on 19 February 2025 because no bed was available at Queens Centre. She remained there for 21 hours and died at Hull Royal Infirmary on 20 February 2025; the inquest recorded pneumonia as the immediate cause of death, with mesothelioma, immunotherapy-induced myocarditis and chronic kidney disease contributing. The principal concern was that insufficient specialist end-of-life bed capacity resulted in patients receiving palliative care in unsuitable emergency-department environments, with potential delays to appropriate emergency treatment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient bed space in Queens Centre

    Wider context from the report

    “1. During the evidence it was heard that the emergency department still has people being held in their department who should be getting ward based care. Additionally, that there has been no increase in the bed space available for Queens Centre. This meant that I could have no reassurance that the circumstances of Mrs Ward’s death would not be repeated, but also that people requiring emergency treatment may be delayed in receiving the appropriate emergency care. ”

    Source location

    Kathleen Rose WARD · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review demand modelling and future cancer and supportive-care capacity requirements with commissioners.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust cannot unilaterally increase the permanent bed base for this service. Capacity is set through specialised commissioning arrangements with NHS England and the Integrated Care Board (ICB), including workforce, funding, and estate constraints. We continue to work closely with commissioners to review demand modelling and future requirements for cancer and supportive care capacity.”

    Source location

    Response from Hull Royal Infirmary
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Model beds, review discharge processes, and work with community partners to improve specialist and acute bed flow.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust is undertaking ongoing initiatives to bed model, review processes to maximise discharges, and work with community partners to support patients who require social care. These actions are consistent with national guidance and aim to improve flow through the acute bed base, including specialist oncology beds.”

    Source location

    Response from Hull Royal Infirmary
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust cannot unilaterally increase permanent specialist bed capacity because commissioning, workforce, funding and estate constraints determine the available service capacity.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust cannot unilaterally increase the permanent bed base for this service. Capacity is set through specialised commissioning arrangements with NHS England and the Integrated Care Board (ICB), including workforce, funding, and estate constraints. We continue to work closely with commissioners to review demand modelling and future requirements for cancer and supportive care capacity.”

    Source location

    Response from Hull Royal Infirmary
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 November 2025

    Open published response
  2. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Janet Alison Anderson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Janet Alison Anderson, who had schizophrenia, Lewy Body Dementia and Parkinsonism symptoms, was admitted to Manchester Royal Infirmary with a suspected infection and remained there after she was medically optimised for discharge. She subsequently declined, developed repeated infections, and died on 28 October 2024 from bilateral pneumonia. Concerns included the prolonged hospital stay, lack of joined-up working and discharge planning between trusts, poor documentation of key decisions, and the resulting unavailability of an acute hospital bed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of acute hospital beds for patients needing acute care

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The lack of progress in discharge meant that an acute hospital bed was not available to other patients who needed care in an acute setting. ”

    Source location

    Janet Alison Anderson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish an escalation pathway beyond the PTL meeting for delayed Mental Health Services discharges, bringing cases to GMMH senior leadership to support confirmation of hospital discharge dates.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Actions taken by MFT MFT accept that the established escalation processes through the PTL meeting did not achieve timely discharge for Mrs Anderson. This was largely a result of the specific circumstances of her case, particularly the requirement for her to be accommodated outside her current local authority area. However, as a result of her case, discussions have been held with colleagues in GMMH to provide a more robust escalation process where discharge being organised by the CMHT is taking longer than expected.”

    Source location

    Response from Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Pursue system-wide reductions in clinically ready-for-discharge bed days and mental-health acute inpatient length of stay by March 2026.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As a Greater Manchester (GM) system, we have committed to reducing the number of Clinically Ready for Discharge (CRFD) bed days by 25% and reducing the Length of Stay (LoS) for Mental Health Adult acute, older adults Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) inpatients wards by end March 2026. A trajectory has been set and is monitored through a single source data set to ensure alignment and a comprehensive dashboard for monitoring is available system wide.”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement locality improvement plans addressing accommodation, complex-needs, step-up, step-down, escalation, urgent-care integration and cross-border discharge barriers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To support the reduction, NHS GM localities have committed to and submitted Improvement Plans. These show that barriers to discharge remain, particularly in relation to accommodation pathways and individuals with complex needs. Localities are addressing these barriers through focused actions around step-up/step-down provision, targeted escalation approaches for complex patients, urgent and emergency care integration schemes, and coordinated planning for cross-border discharges. Manchester locality remains the locality with the highest number of Out of Area Placements (OAPs), Long Stay Patients (LSP’s), and CRFD cases. However, significant work has been undertaken and, as an example of progress to date, we have seen a 38% reduction in the Manchester locality, giving us confidence that our plans and actions are having an impact.”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate a senior system Multi Agency Discharge Event forum to improve clinically ready-for-discharge escalation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Improved CRFD escalation through a newly implemented senior system MADE forum”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Realign community support resources toward housing and forensic step-down.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Realignment of community support resources with a focus on housing and forensic step-down”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Match patients actively to schemes within the new local provider framework.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Active matching of patients to the new local provider framework schemes”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a consistent end-to-end brokerage and funding pathway with responsibilities, stage time standards and a protocol for external-provider delays.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, a series of extraordinary MADE events have taken place, reviewing every CRFD case and identifying both individual and system-level blockers. One of the key actions agreed is the development of a consistent, end-to-end brokerage and funding pathway. This will define clear responsibilities, time standards at each stage, and introduce a formal protocol for cases that depend on external provider responses. In these cases, delays will be logged and monitored but not attributed to statutory agencies.”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Fund and recruit additional patient-flow capacity and gatekeeping roles covering admissions, weekends and out-of-hours periods.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Additional patient flow capacity and gatekeeping roles have been funded and recruited to ensure robust admissions and additional focus on weekends and out of hours.”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide additional voluntary, community and social-enterprise capacity in Manchester to prevent avoidable admissions and support timely discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Additional Voluntary Community and Social Enterprise (VCSE) capacity in Manchester locality to support prevention of avoidable admissions and ensure timely discharge following inpatient admissions”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review support-accommodation barriers in Bury and share the resulting learning system-wide.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Bespoke work in Bury to review support accommodation barriers – learning to shared system wide”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review community-based alternatives to admission across Greater Manchester.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Review across GM of community-based alternatives to admission”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Embed the Home First model across localities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Home First model to be embedded in localities”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 20 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Roll out system-wide a four-level escalation policy for clinically ready-for-discharge mental-health patients by quarter three.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As well as the actions and improvements listed above, an escalation policy for Mental Health patients who are CRFD is due to be rolled out system wide by quarter 3. This escalation process could be applied to the case of a patient who is CRFD in a medical bed but waiting for a package of care through a MH provider. The process, which is currently being piloted, provides a system aligned to 4 levels of escalation, levels 1-4. Any case where a mental health patient is CRFD with an unidentified barrier to discharge can be escalated.”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 20 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct a joint internal review of the patient journey through a GMMH learning multidisciplinary meeting with partner agencies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Both Trusts have agreed to the opportunity to internally review Ms Anderson’s patient journey, GMMH will hold a Learning Multi-Disciplinary Team Meeting, with the following invitees:”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Mental Health
    Page 1 · response
    Published 20 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish a full-time Operational Manager for Community Flow to oversee early discharge planning, identify barriers, track actions, and coordinate senior communication with MFT.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There are internal processes within GMMH which bring all patients who are identified as being ‘clinically ready for discharge’ (CRFD) into daily meetings to track progress in discharge planning and drive plans forward. From May 2024 Ms Anderson’s case and attempts to assess and identify a placement picked up in pace and focus as a result, but this should have been commenced earlier. There should be a focus on identifying barriers to discharge and making discharge planning the focus from the first day of admission; in many instances this is the case but clearly not in the instance of Ms Anderson where this only occurred once hitting CRFD. To rectify this, GMMH has developed a new post in the CMHT’s of a full time Operational Manager for Community Flow who will commence in post on 23 June 2025.”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Mental Health
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 May 2025

    Open published response
  3. North East Kent

    AI-generated summary

    Dorothy Lilian REID · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Dorothy Reid, a 91-year-old woman, suffered spinal fractures after a fall and later died from a pulmonary embolism on 3 April 2024. Concerns included delays and poor conditions in the emergency department, the impact of hospital bed shortages on emergency care, and patients’ reluctance to attend hospital because of long waiting times.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in emergency treatment caused by unavailable inpatient beds

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Both attendances at the emergency department were on busy shifts but evidence heard from staff was that this was not unusual and the reasons being that beds in the hospital are blocked by patients who are medically fit for discharge. The evidence heard was that on average around 25% of the hospital beds were filled with patients who did not need to be there which in turn leads to patients who need to be admitted not having a bed to be admitted into. This in turn leads to patients waiting in the emergency department for a bed. This places unnecessary pressure on the emergency departments and leads to delays for those seeking emergency treatment. The evidence heard suggested that this was a national not local problem. ”

    Source location

    Dorothy Lilian REID · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to free hospital beds occupied by patients medically fit for discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Both attendances at the emergency department were on busy shifts but evidence heard from staff was that this was not unusual and the reasons being that beds in the hospital are blocked by patients who are medically fit for discharge. The evidence heard was that on average around 25% of the hospital beds were filled with patients who did not need to be there which in turn leads to patients who need to be admitted not having a bed to be admitted into. This in turn leads to patients waiting in the emergency department for a bed. This places unnecessary pressure on the emergency departments and leads to delays for those seeking emergency treatment. The evidence heard suggested that this was a national not local problem. ”

    Source location

    Dorothy Lilian REID · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Increase same-day emergency care so more patients are seen, treated and discharged within one day.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The NHS will focus on delivering the following range of practical actions to improve performance in 2025/26:”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Increase the proportion of patients discharged by or on day seven of admission.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The NHS will focus on delivering the following range of practical actions to improve performance in 2025/26:”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop local NHS and social-care partnerships to reduce delayed discharges and patients waiting to leave hospital.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Regarding the concern raised about bed capacity and delays to patient discharge from hospitals, this government will make sure that hospital departments are no longer blocked due to delayed discharges. By developing local partnership working between the NHS and social care, we will ensure we no longer have over 12,000 patients every day waiting to be discharged.”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue operating-model work with regions to support providers in reducing Emergency Department crowding.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England will continue to work through the operating model and assist its Regions with supporting providers to reduce crowding in EDs. In the longer term, NHS England hopes to eliminate this by focusing on reducing the number of patients that wait longer than 12 hours in EDs. Improvements are being demonstrated through NHS England’s operational planning guidance, where systems were asked to focus on areas to deliver improved patient flow such as increasing the proportion of patients streamed to alternative services such as urgent treatment centres (UTCs), same day emergency care (SDEC) and acute frailty services (AFS). This includes increasing the productivity of acute and non-acute hospital services, improving flow as well as clinical outcomes.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue operational planning guidance requiring systems to improve patient flow through alternative urgent and emergency care services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England will continue to work through the operating model and assist its Regions with supporting providers to reduce crowding in EDs. In the longer term, NHS England hopes to eliminate this by focusing on reducing the number of patients that wait longer than 12 hours in EDs. Improvements are being demonstrated through NHS England’s operational planning guidance, where systems were asked to focus on areas to deliver improved patient flow such as increasing the proportion of patients streamed to alternative services such as urgent treatment centres (UTCs), same day emergency care (SDEC) and acute frailty services (AFS). This includes increasing the productivity of acute and non-acute hospital services, improving flow as well as clinical outcomes.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen use of Discharge Ready Date and Reason for Discharge Delay data to identify and reduce discharge delays.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England recognises the significant impact that delayed discharges have on hospital flow, ambulance handovers and the patients affected by these delays. To address this, we are strengthening the use of Discharge Ready Date (DRD) and Reason for Discharge Delay (RfDD) data to gain a clearer understanding of discharge delays and their key contributing factors, both locally and nationally, so that measures can be taken to reduce the number of patients occupying beds who are ready for discharge.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with local areas and health, social care and local-government partners to maximise discharge-funding impact and improve timely patient discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Over the coming year we will be working with local areas to support them to maximise the impact of this investment, for example by providing additional or enhanced support to those areas which face particular challenges, and working with partners in local government and social care including the Local Government Association (LGA), Directors of Social Services (DASSs) and Care and Health Improvement Advisers (CHIAs) to support local systems to improve timely discharge of patients.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Collect daily data on patients experiencing long Emergency Department waits and track actions to support appropriate accommodation and patient-safety review.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England has commenced a data collection of patients experiencing long waits in Emergency Departments on a daily basis and will ensure actions are in place to appropriately accommodate these patients as soon as possible. The data is discussed at the National Coordination Centre call, with actions tracked to ensure executive oversight and assurance as well as patient safety and harm reviews of/for patients waiting.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Collect weekly data on patients waiting over 100 days for discharge and use system leadership, coordination calls and regional engagement to enable appropriate discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, to reduce the number of very long discharge waits, we have been collecting weekly data to identify the number of patients waiting over 100 days and will ensure actions are being taken through system leadership to enable patients to be discharged to the most appropriate setting as soon as possible. The patients identified as waiting over 100 days will be discussed at a weekly National Coordination Centre call, and themes will be tracked through weekly regional engagement meetings.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reform the Better Care Fund so pooled NHS and local-authority funding supports reducing emergency admissions, delayed discharges and care-home admissions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are reforming the Better Care Fund to ensure pooled NHS and local authority funding spent on social care contributes to wider efforts to reduce emergency admissions, delayed discharges, and care home admissions. We will continue to join up health and care services by supporting care workers to safely take on further duties to deliver delegated healthcare activities, such as blood pressure checks and other healthcare interventions, so that people can receive more routine checks and care at home without needing to travel to healthcare settings.”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response
  4. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    George Neville Coulthard · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    George Neville Coulthard sustained skin wounds after an accidental fall, experienced gastrointestinal bleeds while in hospital, and later deteriorated and died at Bramhall Manor on 27 January 2024. The principal concerns were delays in discharge due to difficulty finding a suitable care home, ineffective communication about whether he required end-of-life care or rehabilitation, failure to clarify care arrangements, and limited community access to wound-care support.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of acute beds causing delays in allocating beds to patients requiring admission

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Mr Coulthard was assessed as being suitable for discharge on 18th December. He remained in an acute hospital setting for a further 4 weeks due to challenges in identifying a suitable care home. This was due to the inquest was told to a shortage of suitable places and the Christmas period. The impact of this on Mr Coulthard was that he remained in an acute setting when the inquest was told the care he required would have been better delivered in a care home /nursing home setting. In addition the inquest heard evidence that it meant that an acute bed required for other patients was not available creating delays in allocating beds to patients requiring admission. The inquest was told that significant delays of this nature occur on a regular basis and are often exacerbated over the Christmas period. ”

    Source location

    George Neville Coulthard · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue reviewing discharge processes, alternatives to hospital admission, and patient-flow pathways across Greater Manchester hospitals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “You refer to such delays occurring on a regular basis and often exacerbated by the festive period. The winter period generally is extremely busy with high numbers of patients entering the hospital and needing to be admitted for care and treatment. Whilst every effort is made to appropriately manage the flow of patients to free up beds, there are occasions when delays in discharge do impact on patient flow. This is regrettably not a scenario that is specific to the festive period as such challenges occur throughout the year, but particularly through the winter months. As a system we consistently review discharge processes, alternatives to hospital admission, and patient flow pathways. This is with a view to improving the patient experience and flow through all GM hospitals so that patients can receive the right care at the right time and in the right place.”

    Source location

    Response from GMIC
    Page 4 · response
    Published 24 September 2024

    Open published response
  5. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Benjamin Paul Stanley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Benjamin Paul Stanley developed chronic pancreatitis, became severely malnourished, and was admitted to Stepping Hill Hospital on 11 May 2022. He deteriorated, developing liver cirrhosis, sepsis and a Clostridium difficile infection, and died in hospital on 19 May 2022. The concerns identified included prolonged waits in A&E linked to demand and a lack of beds; in his case, direct entry to a ward was considered to have been in his best interests, but he had to wait in A&E for a bed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient hospital bed capacity

    Wider context from the report

    “The Inquest heard evidence of significant waits in Accident and Emergency (A&E) to be seen due to the pressure on the department. The Inquest heard that the hospital had not improved since his death and there were regular waits in excess of 11 hours in A&E due to demand on services which impacted on patients care and treatment. The position was not unique to the particular Trust but was replicated in Trusts across Greater Manchester. The Inquest was told that prolonged waits in A&E were also due to a lack of beds with the hospital. In Mr Stanley’s case direct entry to a ward would have been in his best interests. However lack of capacity meant that he had to be advised to go to A&E and wait for a bed. ”

    Source location

    Benjamin Paul Stanley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver 5,000 additional staffed, permanent hospital beds to increase capacity and improve patient flow.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A key part of the plan has been to increase hospital capacity to improve patient flow and reduce overcrowding in A&E. We have achieved the ambition of delivering 5,000 more staffed, permanent beds this year compared to 2022-23 plans - backed by £1”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 20 February 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Make £1.6 billion available over two years to support timely hospital discharge and free beds.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We recognise that a whole-system approach is needed to ensure people get the emergency care they need when they need it. This is why we have made £1.6 billion of funding available over two years to support the NHS and local authorities to ensure timely and effective discharge from hospital, helping to free up beds and reduce long waits for admission from A&E. NHS England also launched its universal support offer, available to all systems, including Stockport NHS Foundation Trust which supported systems to implement high impact initiatives and improve emergency care performance ahead of winter this year.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 February 2023

    Open published response
  6. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Joseph Michael Cheetham · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Joseph Michael Cheetham suffered an unwitnessed accidental fall, underwent surgery for a dislocated prosthetic hip, and later died in hospital on 22 January 2020 after pneumonia, dysphagia and respiratory deterioration. Concerns included prolonged waiting in the Emergency Department because of bed shortages and discharge home before a care package was in place, while he was frail and vulnerable and had lost weight in hospital.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of acute hospital bed capacity

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The inquest heard that his GP had sought to have him admitted directly into hospital having identified that he needed to be hospitalised. However, contact with the trust identified that the acute bed shortage meant that this would not be possible, and he would have to go via A and E. On arrival at A and E the volume of those waiting to be seen meant that he waited in cold and draughty areas of the department. Lack of bed capacity in the hospital meant that he spent over 24 hours in the A and E department despite being frail and vulnerable. ”

    Source location

    Joseph Michael Cheetham · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue rolling out Urgent Treatment Centres to provide a consistent urgent-care service.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In 2019/20, this involved continued work to tackle both the increases in demand in urgent and emergency care and to ensure patients receive the quality of care they need and expect in a timely and safe manner. For example, the continued roll out of Urgent Treatment Centres, offering a consistent service to patients and introducing the ability to book appointments through NHS 111, as well as initiatives such as Same Day Emergency Care, to reduce non-elective admissions to hospital.”

    Source location

    2020-0189-Response-from-Dept.-of-Health-and-Social-Care_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 November 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue Same Day Emergency Care initiatives to reduce non-elective hospital admissions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In 2019/20, this involved continued work to tackle both the increases in demand in urgent and emergency care and to ensure patients receive the quality of care they need and expect in a timely and safe manner. For example, the continued roll out of Urgent Treatment Centres, offering a consistent service to patients and introducing the ability to book appointments through NHS 111, as well as initiatives such as Same Day Emergency Care, to reduce non-elective admissions to hospital.”

    Source location

    2020-0189-Response-from-Dept.-of-Health-and-Social-Care_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 November 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain Nightingale Hospitals, their surge capacity and NHS use of independent-sector hospital capacity.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This year, we have provided an extra £3billion to alleviate the particular challenges brought by the Covid-19 pandemic ahead of winter and are maintaining the Nightingale Hospitals and their surge capacity, as well as the NHS’s use of independent sector hospital capacity.”

    Source location

    2020-0189-Response-from-Dept.-of-Health-and-Social-Care_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 November 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Expand NHS 111 to provide urgent-care advice and direct patients to appropriate services more quickly.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Other elements of the NHS winter plan for 2020/21 include the expansion of NHS 111 to support patients who need urgent care advice and direct them to the right service more quickly, rather than waiting in A&E².”

    Source location

    2020-0189-Response-from-Dept.-of-Health-and-Social-Care_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 November 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement agreed principles requiring direct specialty acceptance, specialty assessment of stable patients, and expanded Same Day Emergency Care across Greater Manchester.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of the Greater Manchester Urgent Transformation Programme, we have developed and agreed a set of principles for all localities to adopt which will help to prevent a re-occurrence of this. The agreed principles are as follows:”

    Source location

    2020-0189-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership_Redacted.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 23 November 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement NHS 111 First so patients are directed to call 111 before attending an Emergency Department.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Implementation of the new national NHS 111 First Initiative, which will ask patients to call 111 prior to attending an Emergency Department”

    Source location

    2020-0189-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 November 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement pre-Emergency Department triage and streaming to direct patients to the most appropriate service.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A new pre-Emergency Department triage and streaming system”

    Source location

    2020-0189-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 November 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Adopt and implement Greater Manchester Discharge to Assess guidance, including standard referral, rapid triage, discharge medication, testing, PPE and next-day follow-up processes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of the initial COVID 19 response, Greater Manchester localities worked to rapidly develop updated Discharge to Assess Pathway Guidance, which were formally approved in late April and have now been adopted across all localities within Greater Manchester. The purpose of the guidance is to improve the flow of all patients being discharged from acute care and to help ensure patients’ needs are assessed in the home or usual place of residence – not in the hospital. If it is not”

    Source location

    2020-0189-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 November 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create additional community discharge capacity, including reablement support, domiciliary care and community beds.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The guidance is fully aligned with national policy and guidance and there has been significant additional community-based capacity created to support this. The additional capacity includes: reablement support, domiciliary care and community beds. Further work is underway to review community-based capacity to support discharges to ensure the correct types of capacity. There has since been a significant reduction in delayed transfers of care across GM from approximately 5% to less than 1%.”

    Source location

    2020-0189-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 November 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review community-based capacity to ensure discharge pathways have the correct types of capacity.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The guidance is fully aligned with national policy and guidance and there has been significant additional community-based capacity created to support this. The additional capacity includes: reablement support, domiciliary care and community beds. Further work is underway to review community-based capacity to support discharges to ensure the correct types of capacity. There has since been a significant reduction in delayed transfers of care across GM from approximately 5% to less than 1%.”

    Source location

    2020-0189-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Health-and-Social-Care-Partnership_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 November 2020

    Open published response
  7. Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Ronald William Bennett · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ronald William Bennett was the subject of an inquest whose circumstances are referred to in the Record of Inquest, which is not provided here. The substantive concerns included delays in ambulance crews reaching incidents because of hospital handover delays, inadequate urgent and emergency services, and bed availability; the report states that the delay in Mr Bennett’s admission did not contribute to his death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of hospital bed availability delaying patient admission

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) There are serious delays in ambulance crews arriving at the scene of an incident as a consequence of ambulance crews being delayed at the Accident and Emergency department as they are unable to handover patients within the national standard for hospital handovers at A and E of 30 minutes. I heard evidence that on the 20 February 2016, out of 105 patients conveyed to hospital, 91 patients were delayed over 30 minutes (95.55%), 2 patients over 120 minutes. The hours lost to handover and turnaround delays from April 2015-January 2017 at the Royal Sussex County Hospital Brighton were 12779.70. ( an average of 580.9 per month/19.9 hours a day). (2) Care Quality Commission report published 23.10.2015-urgent - emergency services found to be inadequate. (3) Reasons for delay in hospital handovers were various involving not only the Accident and Emergency department but the inability of the hospital to admit patients because of lack of availability of beds. (4) It should be noted that in respect of Mr.Bennett, that although there was a significant delay in him being admitted to hospital, this did not contribute to his death. (5) It should also be noted that some steps are being taken to address these issues and there is cooperation between SECAMB and the RSCH. ”

    Source location

    Ronald William Bennett · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a £31 million capital scheme expanding the emergency floor, Urgent Care Centre, Emergency Department GP input and ambulatory emergency care at Royal Sussex County Hospital.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “(3) We now have a £31m capital scheme in development to expand the emergency floor, including an expanded Urgent Care Centre at the Royal Sussex County Hospital, more GP input to the Emergency Department and an ambulatory emergency care facility in advance of next winter.”

    Source location

    2017-0097-Response-by-Brighton-Sussex-University-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 July 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review service provision at Princess Royal Hospital to relieve pressure on Royal Sussex County Hospital bed capacity.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “(4) The Trust’s Clinical Transformation Programme includes the following measures:”

    Source location

    2017-0097-Response-by-Brighton-Sussex-University-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 July 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the SAFER care bundle to improve patient flow and support earlier discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “(4) The Trust’s Clinical Transformation Programme includes the following measures:”

    Source location

    2017-0097-Response-by-Brighton-Sussex-University-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 July 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Expand Newhaven Downs Community Hospital to create additional discharge capacity.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “(4) The Trust’s Clinical Transformation Programme includes the following measures:”

    Source location

    2017-0097-Response-by-Brighton-Sussex-University-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 July 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Extend the Hospital at Home scheme to provide additional nursing and medical support after discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “(4) The Trust’s Clinical Transformation Programme includes the following measures:”

    Source location

    2017-0097-Response-by-Brighton-Sussex-University-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 July 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing system-partner arrangements are considered sufficient to prioritise the problem and sustain improvement, although the problem is not yet resolved.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Although I cannot give you assurance that this complex and multi-factorial problem is fixed, I am confident that the matter is now being given sufficient priority by our acute, community and primary care partners. Its impact on our services is significant, and we are doing all we reasonably can to ensure improvement is sustained.”

    Source location

    2017-0097-Response-by-South-East-Coast-Ambulance-Service-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 July 2017

    Open published response
  8. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Gillian Rose Taylor · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Gillian Rose Taylor had a lengthy history of mental health issues and repeated suicide attempts. After being detained under the Mental Health Act and treated away from Powys because no acute bed was available locally, she remained under community mental health care until her death by hanging at home on 3 January 2016. The concerns included the lack of an acute treatment facility in Powys, resulting patient transfers, lack of continuity of treatment, and the possible adverse effect of this experience on her engagement with mental health professionals and risk of self-harm or suicide.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of an acute treatment facility for acute admission patients in Powys

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) It is believed that Powys Health Board is the only Health Board in the country that has no facility available to it for the treatment of acute admission patients in the position of Mrs Taylor. ”

    Source location

    Gillian Rose Taylor · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of an acute treatment facility for acutely unwell patients in Powys

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) There is no acute facility in Powys for the treatment of acutely unwell patients, which the evidence showed, often leads to patients being moved the length and breadth of the country to an establishment where a bed can be found. The evidence also showed that the local acute unit at the Redwoord Centre in Shrewsbury had recently experienced a significant reduction in the number of acute beds available compounding and exacerbating the problem. ”

    Source location

    Gillian Rose Taylor · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain a fully functioning Crisis Resolution Home Treatment Team providing acute hospital-level care at home.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A series of steps was taken. This involved establishing a fully functioning CRHTT which reduced the need for admissions out of county. Weekly discussions were put in place between Redwoods and local services to help get patients admitted to Redwoods when needed. Additional funding was allocated to the local service in Montgomeryshire, including for additional care co-ordination to help address out of county admissions. This was monitored on a weekly basis. The graphs attached at Appendix 1 (enclosed) show that the difficulties with admission significantly reduced for a sustained period. As the second graph indicates, acute admissions had been falling during October 2015 although they started to rise during November.”

    Source location

    2016-0178-Response-by-Powys-Teaching-Health-Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 May 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue repatriating adult mental health services to direct delivery by Powys Teaching Health Board.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In summary, having considered the matters you have raised, we have taken action as described below to put in place robust, high quality, safe services for our Powys population. As you will read, these actions are continuing reflecting the current work within Powys Teaching Local Health Board to repatriate adult mental health services.”

    Source location

    2016-0178-Response-by-Powys-Teaching-Health-Board
    Page 1 · response
    Published 11 May 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Explore every available in-county treatment option before arranging out-of-county admission.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We acknowledge that when a North Powys patient is admitted out of area this can be disruptive for both patient and their family, and prior to admission out of county we seek to explore every in county treatment option first. We continue to commission inpatient provision in the Redwoods centre, however across the UK access to specialist beds is limited and unfortunately we share the same challenges in securing in patient beds close to home as many of our neighbouring Health Boards.”

    Source location

    2016-0178-Response-by-Powys-Teaching-Health-Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 11 May 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Facilitate a meeting of all health board mental health managers to discuss using Welsh NHS beds when local beds are unavailable, considering proximity to patients’ homes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since your report a meeting between all Health Boards mental health managers facilitated by Welsh Government has been held to discuss using Welsh NHS beds whenever possible if local beds are not available. It was accepted that proximity to a patients home would have to be considered in this context.”

    Source location

    2016-0178-Response-by-Welsh-Government
    Page 1 · response
    Published 11 May 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Acute adult mental health provision already exists within Powys, contrary to the concern that no acute facility is available.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is important to clarify that there is acute adult mental health provision within Powys in addition to the services we commission from other providers close to our borders.”

    Source location

    2016-0178-Response-by-Powys-Teaching-Health-Board
    Page 1 · response
    Published 11 May 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Powys is responsible for commissioning mental health services for its rural, dispersed population, including local and neighbouring-provider beds.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is for Powys which is a very rural county to commission services for their smaller and dispersed population and in fact they do have acute mental health beds provided in Bronllys Hospital. There are also beds commissioned from neighbouring Trusts and Health Boards to minimise distances travelled by the population, or to provide expertise that require a level of critical mass and to meet professional guidelines that a population the size of Powys could not be expected to reach.”

    Source location

    2016-0178-Response-by-Welsh-Government
    Page 1 · response
    Published 11 May 2016

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026