Recurring concern

Unreliable inter-agency information sharing for coordinated care

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 29 May 2013•Latest report 15 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of the inter-agency care information-sharing system, including inadequate arrangements, communication channels, shared records or contact mechanisms when these prevent timely access to relevant care, needs or risk information between agencies.

Not included

  • Excludes information-sharing failures unrelated to coordination between agencies supporting a person.
  • Excludes failures confined to a single organisation's records, assessment, documentation or communication process unless the report directly links them to inter-agency information sharing.
  • Excludes generic staffing, confidentiality, policy or technology deficiencies that are not specifically tied to the unsafe inter-agency information-sharing condition.
  • Excludes hazards involving public access to harmful information or physical communication and rescue equipment.
Reports
212

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
235

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
492

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care57
NHS England39
Ministry of Justice14
Home Office11
Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership9
HM Prison and Probation Service8
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board8
Care Quality Commission7
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust7
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust6
Metropolitan Police Service6
College of Policing5
Greater Manchester Police5
Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust5
Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust5

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Hannah Dolly Kaur Bharaj · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Hannah Dolly Kaur Bharaj had anorexia, depression and fluctuating suicidal ideation, and died at Salford Royal Hospital on 13 July 2018 from injuries sustained after jumping from a first-floor café. Concerns included inadequate communication and discharge planning, unsuitable placement and care coordination, incomplete sharing of clinical information, and the safety of the café balustrade and adjacent table.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of mental health trusts to communicate placement information with private providers and families

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Communication with private providers by NHS trusts once mental health trusts have placed individuals in private settings. During the time that Hannah was placed at the Priory the mental health trust who placed her did not have any discussion with Hannah, her family or the Priory regarding the placement. A care coordinator had been allocated by the Trust once requested by the Priory but no care coordination had taken place; ”

    Source location

    Hannah Dolly Kaur Bharaj · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of private providers to obtain relevant clinical information from referring services

    Wider context from the report

    “5.The expectations around information sharing with private providers and the expectation on private providers contracted by the NHS to seek information. The Priory did not request any notes from the EDU about Hannah. As a result they were unaware of detailed information held by the Trust regarding previously expressed suicidal ideation; ”

    Source location

    Hannah Dolly Kaur Bharaj · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. Stoke-on-Trent and North Staffordshire

    AI-generated summary

    Andrew Peter McCall · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Andrew Peter McCall was found face down and unresponsive in supported living accommodation on 18 September 2018. A post-mortem examination and toxicology attributed his death to gastric aspiration associated with Pregabalin and Methadone use. The report raised concern that his GP was unaware of his Methadone prescription and could therefore prescribe medications that might be unsuitable or potentially harmful.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to independently verify patients’ concurrent opiate replacement therapy and prescribing organisation

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence revealed a clear pattern of “medication seeking behaviour” with his GP to obtain additional amounts of Pregabalin. The evidence also showed that his GP was not aware that he was on a current Methadone script. The “One Recovery” clinic operated a system which was dependent upon the service user declaring which GP practice they were registered with. This was not checked or verified independently and therefore concern must exist that the GP may be unaware that a patient is on an opiate replacement regime, prescribed by another organisation, and may therefore prescribe medications which may not be suitable and which may potentially be harmful. It is suggested that, where patients are prescribed medication as part of “opiate replacement therapy”, GPs have the means to check the details and the organisation providing such a service. This puts in place a more robust system to ensure that the current GP is fully aware of the treatment programme. ”

    Source location

    Andrew Peter McCall · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Contact the service lead and request reviews of GP-data collection, verification, and reliable information sharing with registered GPs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Dr Kenneth Deacon, Medical Director for System Improvement and Professional Standards (Midlands) will:”

    Source location

    2019-0228-Response-by-NHS-England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 September 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Write to Staffordshire GP practices about the inquest risks, considering other agencies' opiate prescribing, and alerting the clinic when patients are registered elsewhere.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Write to all GP practices within Staffordshire: - making them aware of the inquest findings, and the risks this highlights; - reminding them of the importance of considering whether other agencies might be prescribing opiate replacements; and - asking them to alert the clinic directly if they receive information relating to a patient not registered at the practice (so the correct practice can be identified quickly).”

    Source location

    2019-0228-Response-by-NHS-England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 September 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NHS England is neither commissioner nor regulator of these substance misuse services and has no direct responsibility for them.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Although NHS England is neither the commissioner or regulator of these services, and have no direct responsibility for them, we recognise the importance of the concerns you have raised, and are taking the following action:”

    Source location

    2019-0228-Response-by-NHS-England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 September 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Local Authority, rather than NHS England or the Clinical Commissioning Group, commissions these substance misuse services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In this case the service is provided by One Recovery Clinic, in conjunction with North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare NHS Trust. The lead provider is Addiction Dependency Solution. Substance misuse services are commissioned by the Local Authority, not NHS England or the Clinical Commissioning Group.”

    Source location

    2019-0228-Response-by-NHS-England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 September 2019

    Open published response
  3. Wiltshire and Swindon

    AI-generated summary

    Heather Birchall · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Heather Birchall, who was homeless and had mental health problems and alcohol dependence, died after consuming excess amounts of medication alongside alcohol; bronchopneumonia also contributed to the mechanism of death. The principal concern was that healthcare professionals assessing people in police custody might lack relevant mental health information because of confidentiality barriers, potentially limiting informed decisions about further care and safeguarding life.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide healthcare professionals with complete relevant mental-health information for frontline assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “One of the concerns that arose relates to G4S healthcare professionals and any other healthcare professional in this situation when asked to carry out a front line assessment which could include mental health features, that those individuals may not have the fullest amount of information that is available so that they can make an informed decision as to whether or not for example further healthcare input is required, such as an example a formal mental health at assessment. Whilst a problem insofar as getting a complete picture did not seem to be quite such an issue when personnel from LADS were available it would appear that out of those hours, if a G4S healthcare professional wanted to make enquiries insofar as an individual’s mental health background which potentially might be within the knowledge of the relevant healthcare trust, that when an approach is made to the Street Triage team out of hours that more often than not the issue of confidentiality was raised to withhold information or I felt that equally there was a danger that selective information might only be passed at best to the G4S healthcare operative. The concern that I was left with was that the healthcare professionals from G4S and arguably at the end of the day Wiltshire Police who ultimately responsibility it is to safeguard life when an individual is in Police custody are effectively trying to do a job, through their contract service providers (G4S), in circumstances whereby in trying to discharge their duty having regard to Article 2 of European Convention of Human Rights they were doing so effectively, as a consequence of patient confidentiality, with one arm tied behind their back. ”

    Source location

    Heather Birchall · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Aram Ali Mustafa · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Aram Ali Mustafa, an asylum seeker living in initial accommodation, was found hanging by a scarf in his room on 4 February 2019 and was declared deceased at 23.10. The report identified concerns that earlier suicide and safeguarding information was not sufficiently detailed or logged across the organisations involved.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide sufficient details about safeguarding concerns and health care matters

    Wider context from the report

    “1. When he had first illegally entered the UK Mr Mustafa was deported to Italy on 29/10/18. Just before he was deported he confirmed he would kill himself if he was deported. He was provided with 1:1 constant watch and was successfully deported. When he re-entered the UK on 30/01/19 he was seen by a member of the immigration compliance and enforcement team who completed paperwork for the national asylum accommodation unit who in turn completed a service commission form requesting initial accommodation. The service commission form recorded that he had urgent medical needs and was a safeguarding concern however no detail was provided. Neither G4S nor Urban housing services requested any further details. A system needs to be put in place to ensure organisations provide sufficient details for providers to understand the nature of safeguarding concerns and health care matters. If there are GDPR concerns these could easily be addressed by a consent form at the time the person is first seen. ”

    Source location

    Aram Ali Mustafa · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Participate in a monthly Senior Safeguarding Working Group reviewing safeguarding cases and information gaps.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The matter of consent forms when service users are first assessed for accommodation is a matter for UKVI. G4S has however taken the following steps in order to seek improvements to the process and level of information exchange:”

    Source location

    2019-0508-Response-from-G4S-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 May 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require fuller vulnerability details, record them on CID and referral forms, and check CID more thoroughly before onward referral.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Home Office have confirmed that the first responders are being challenged for further detail when referring a case into NAAU (National Asylum Allocation Unit) in relation to any indication of vulnerabilities. This information is being recorded on the CID database and on the SCF 4386 referral form prior to being forwarded to the Routing Team. CID is being checked more thoroughly by the Intake Team to reduce the risk of missing information that wasn’t forthcoming from the referring officers.”

    Source location

    2019-0508-Response-from-Government-Legal-Department-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 May 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Check that referring officers identify and record relevant safeguarding and vulnerability concerns on referral forms.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Specific safeguarding and vulnerable concerns are included in the referral form – a list of possible concerns are listed and the referring officer is asked whether they have any relevance to the customer. Checks are put in place to ensure this happens.”

    Source location

    2019-0508-Response-from-Government-Legal-Department-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 May 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Raise safeguarding concerns with G4S when SCF forms lack adequate detail.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “ii. G4S now flag SCF forms where a safeguarding issue is raised without adequate detail being provided with UKVI. UHSL also raise these issues with G4S; and”

    Source location

    2019-0508-Response-from-Urban-Housing-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 May 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Draft and distribute incident reports and support notifications when resident concerns, including mental-health issues, are identified.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “If a concern (such as mental health issues) about a resident is noted, an incident report is drafted and sent to G4S. This includes as much information as we have available and actions we have taken. This information can then be passed on to UKVI by G4S and ensures that these concerns can be notified to any future residence, or those with responsibilities for the resident. An email is also sent to the charity Migrant Help and Attwood Health Centre to enable the resident to obtain the appropriate level of support.”

    Source location

    2019-0508-Response-from-Urban-Housing-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 May 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Information shared with external contractors is limited by GDPR to data shown to be required, relevant, secure and in the applicant’s best interests.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We set out below the factors provided by the Home Office to take into account while sharing information with external contractors in line with GDPR.”

    Source location

    2019-0508-Response-from-Government-Legal-Department-Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 May 2020

    Open published response
  5. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Mason Logue · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mason Logue, who had been born prematurely and had a complex medical history, was found unresponsive in his mother’s bed at home on 28 October 2017. The post-mortem examination did not identify a clear cause of death, and the medical cause was recorded as unascertained. Concerns included limited integration and information sharing between services, the absence of an overarching supportive care plan and a single professional coordinating his care, and difficulties arising from differing protocols and the lack of a single IT system across NHS trusts.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a single IT system supporting information sharing across NHS trusts

    Wider context from the report

    “The inquest heard evidence that the lack of a single IT system across NHS trusts meant that information sharing was more difficult. The red book was not utilised as a tool for sharing information other than by the Health Visitor to record standard information e.g. weight. The purpose and value of the red book was unclear amongst the health professionals. It was clear that clinicians in hospitals rarely utilised it. ”

    Source location

    Mason Logue · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of health and social care services to provide integrated care and share health information

    Wider context from the report

    “The inquest heard that Mason was discharged directly from the tertiary centre into the community after a prolonged period of care in NICU. His mother had previously been known to Family Services. There was limited evidence available of an integrated approach to care from the Local Authority, Tertiary Centre, Local Hospital and Community Health Professionals. As a result, information about his health was not shared between all health professionals. There was no overarching supportive care plan in place on discharge. ”

    Source location

    Mason Logue · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Beverley Shaw · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Beverley Shaw was found deceased in her bed at home in Oldham in the early hours of 11 December 2018. The inquest heard that she had multiple prescribed medicines, was receiving methadone, and was using cocaine and butane gas. Concerns included inadequate communication between the substance misuse service and GP practice about her butane gas use, lack of a full medication review, and incomplete transfer of medical records.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to respond to and action clinical information requests from the substance misuse service

    Wider context from the report

    “○ There is no record of a response from the GP practice to Turning Point following their letter dated the 15th May 2018. This had a number of requests for actions by the GP including the sharing of any blood results (LFT, FC and U&E), together with information confirming whether there was any blood disorders of drugs which may interact with methadone. There was no evidence that this information was shared or actioned. ”

    Source location

    Beverley Shaw · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Promote wider uptake of Focussed Care across Oldham practices to support substance-use-related care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The events surrounding Ms Shaw’s death highlight the requirement for effective and up to date ‘Did Not Attend’ policies to be followed in Primary Care and to initiate discussion in practice meetings to ensure holistic information is shared and reviewed by the team in a manner which supports clinicians to make decisions based on the full facts and influencing factors. Such discussions can trigger communication back to secondary providers such as Turning Point to clarify and/or share information. The presence of Focussed Care within a number of Oldham practices has been seen to support such instances where substance use influences existing co-morbidities and as a CCG we are promoting wider uptake of this across the Oldham footprint.”

    Source location

    2019-0191-Response-by-Oldham-NHS-CCG
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 August 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete a wide-ranging review of GP communication across all community substance misuse services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst we recognise that the clinician had written to the GP, we accept that there is more that we could do to improve this communication, not only in this tragic case but also more broadly across our substance misuse services. Therefore, we have undertaken a wide ranging review of GP communication across all our community substance misuse services, not just in Rochdale and Oldham. That review has been led by our Senior Management Team, including our senior clinical team, and our Risk and Assurance department.”

    Source location

    2019-0191-Response-by-Turning-Point
    Page 1 · response
    Published 23 August 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Improve recording of GP communications in the electronic client records system.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This review has highlighted the key processes that we needed to change in order to improve effective communication and reduce the risk of future recurrence. Those processes are the template used by prescribers to review clients, the frequency of communication with GPs, the way that communication is recorded on our electronic client records system and the processes for audit of the frequency of that communication.”

    Source location

    2019-0191-Response-by-Turning-Point
    Page 1 · response
    Published 23 August 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and improve follow-up systems for requests to GPs for information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We also reviewed our systems for following up requests to GPs for information and the way in which we transfer client data at the beginning and at the end of contracts.”

    Source location

    2019-0191-Response-by-Turning-Point
    Page 1 · response
    Published 23 August 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    A joint learning meeting with Turning Point would occur only if Oldham CCG supported it.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The practice would also, if supported through Oldham CCG have a meeting with Turning Point separately as a learning event to see what further changes we can both make to make sure miscommunications are avoided in the future”

    Source location

    2019-0191-Response-by-Hopwood-House-Medical-Practice
    Page 4 · response
    Published 23 August 2019

    Open published response
  7. Oxfordshire

    AI-generated summary

    Daniel Davey · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Daniel Davey, aged 21, died at John Radcliffe Hospital on 12 January 2018 after deliberately overdosing on propranolol in his cell at HMP Bullingdon Prison. The report raises concerns about healthcare attendance at ACCT reviews, risk assessments and management of in-possession medication, cell searches, and failures to share and act on information relevant to his safety.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate advance notification and information sharing for ACCT reviews

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Healthcare attendance at ACCT reviews – This concern relates to both the prison and healthcare. It was clear from evidence from prison and healthcare staff that it was not routine for healthcare to attend ACCT reviews. This is a significant concern and it is not in accordance with local and national policy. I understand that there were occasions when prison staff requested healthcare attendance, but no one was available. The system of providing advance notification to healthcare about the date of ACCT reviews was not comprehensive. It resulted in ACCT reviews, as in this case, taking place without information being available to the assessor/reviewer. For example, information about suicidal ideation/attempts and other information disclosed to healthcare and also information about ‘in possession medication’. Encouragingly, the evidence from prison and healthcare staff was that ACCT reviews no longer take place without healthcare attendance and/or input (perhaps over the telephone). It would be helpful if there could be a further level of reassurance provided, firstly, communications between prison and healthcare staff in the conduct of ACCT reviews and, secondly, a process of auditing ACCT reviews in order to pick up cases where there is no healthcare input. ”

    Source location

    Daniel Davey · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop escalation procedures with Care UK and the prison for occasions when healthcare cannot attend an ACCT review.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Local Operating Procedure identifies there is an expectation that the staff attending the ACCT record this on SystmOne and future reviews are diarised for attendance. We will actively contribute to quality assurance checks of compliance with this Local Operating Policy including those done as part of the PROTECT audits and are committed to improving our service delivery in response to any actions identified within these checks. In addition we will work with Care UK and the prison in the development of procedures for escalation should healthcare, for any reason, be unable to attend an ACCT review.”

    Source location

    2019-0267-Response-by-Midlands-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 October 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind staff to update medication-in-possession risk assessments during medication reviews so changes feed into ACCT information for dispensing and prison staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Response: As was stated at the inquest, our prescriber’s always record on the prescription form whether the medication they are prescribing should be held in possession. We have reminded our staff to ensure when they are reviewing any medication that they, where necessary, include an update of the ‘Medication In possession risk assessment’ which goes onto SystmOne, which in turn will feed into the ACCT. This ensures that both dispensing staff and prison staff are aware of any changes and respond accordingly, this will include the removal of any medicines currently being held.”

    Source location

    2019-0267-Response-by-Midlands-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 October 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Embed the new ACCT case-management process, including dedicated case managers, review booking oversight and daily healthcare attendance allocation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In June 2019, a new way of operating the ACCT case management system was implemented at Bullingdon, with a specific case manager being allocated to each ACCT case. This system allows ACCT reviews to be booked by the case managers on a spreadsheet that is overseen by the safer custody department. Reviews can be organised earlier through this booking system, giving healthcare better capability to ensure attendance at all reviews, and each day an identified member of healthcare staff is responsible for attending each review or allocating an attendee to go in their place. If there are any issues with healthcare attendance, case managers are asked to inform the safer custody department and remedial action is taken.”

    Source location

    2019-0267-Response-by-HM-Prison-Probation-Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 17 October 2019

    Open published response
  8. Norfolk

    AI-generated summary

    Ellie Jane LONG · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ellie Long was receiving community treatment from the Eating Disorder Service and had diagnoses of Anorexia Nervosa and Depression. She was found hanging in her bedroom on 10 December 2017 and died in hospital on 12 December 2017. The principal concerns were incomplete record keeping and disclosure, and inadequate communication and information sharing with external agencies including her GP and school.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to share relevant information and communicate with external agencies

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Communication with External Agencies a) An initial full, updating letter was sent to Ellie’s GP. However no further updating information was sent. A letter was written providing updating information, but this was not sent. No further updating information was sent to the GP by telephone, letter or email. b) The evidence heard is that efforts were made to contact the school by telephone. However, the school had no record of any such calls. There is no evidence of email or written correspondence or further telephone calls in an effort to communicate with the school. c) It is accepted by the Trust that sharing of relevant information is necessary. NSFT has indicated it will “remind staff of the importance of recording efforts to share information/maintain communication”. d) Sharing of information and communication with external agencies is a matter which has been raised with NSFT on previous occasions. The importance of “recording efforts to share information ...” may not be sufficient to prevent future deaths. It is the importance of sharing information and communicating with external agencies that should be addressed here. Recording of information is dealt with at Point 1 above. ”

    Source location

    Ellie Jane LONG · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Instruct all clinical services to review record-keeping and partner-agency communication practices.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All clinical services have been instructed to review their working practice in respect of record keeping and communication with partner agencies. Responsibility for this rests with the operational managers who will provide assurance of the actions taken to improve performance.”

    Source location

    2019-0090-Response-by-Norfolk-and-Suffolk-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 June 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review working practices for record keeping and communication with partner agencies across clinical services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All clinical services have been instructed to review their working practice in respect of record keeping and communication with partner agencies. Responsibility for this rests with the operational managers who will provide assurance of the actions taken to improve performance.”

    Source location

    2019-0090-Response-by-Norfolk-and-Suffolk-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 June 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide management assurance on actions taken to improve record keeping and partner-agency communication.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All clinical services have been instructed to review their working practice in respect of record keeping and communication with partner agencies. Responsibility for this rests with the operational managers who will provide assurance of the actions taken to improve performance.”

    Source location

    2019-0090-Response-by-Norfolk-and-Suffolk-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 June 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver a learning session on clinicians’ regulatory, legal and professional responsibilities for record keeping and communication.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Supporting this is a learning session to be delivered by the Head of Patient Safety and Safeguarding and the Legal Services Manager. The session will have a specific focus on the regulatory, legal and professional responsibilities each clinician holds with respect to record keeping and communication.”

    Source location

    2019-0090-Response-by-Norfolk-and-Suffolk-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 June 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor intervention effectiveness through audit, user feedback and quality and safety reviews.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust will gain assurance these interventions are working through a number of indicators. This will include audit, user feedback and the outcomes of quality and safety reviews. To support an effective assurance system, the Trust is implementing a new governance structure enabling a combined and tiered approach that will provide the culture and conditions for improvement.”

    Source location

    2019-0090-Response-by-Norfolk-and-Suffolk-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 June 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operational managers are responsible for reviewing record-keeping and partner-agency communication practices and providing assurance of improvement actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All clinical services have been instructed to review their working practice in respect of record keeping and communication with partner agencies. Responsibility for this rests with the operational managers who will provide assurance of the actions taken to improve performance.”

    Source location

    2019-0090-Response-by-Norfolk-and-Suffolk-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 June 2019

    Open published response
  9. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    John William Pearce · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John William Pearce was a frail 90-year-old man who developed a worsening left knee wound after an injury in April 2018 and died in hospital on 21 September 2018. The report identified concerns about delayed hospital referral, insufficient district nursing attendances, reliance on his reluctance to attend hospital, and inadequate systems for recognising and sharing information about worsening wounds.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to share wound photographs for timely escalation decisions

    Wider context from the report

    “I am concerned that: (a) There was no clear instruction, protocol or system which assists nursing staff in dealing with elderly patients who suffer from open wounds which worsen over time, as to when the emergency services should be contacted. It is clear that the staff were following a Tissue Viability Nurse care plan, but no-one appeared to recognise the severity of the injury and the fact that tendons and bone were exposed; (b) There were insufficient attendances on Mr Pearce by the District Nurse Team when it appeared to be decided that he would be visited at more frequent intervals; (c) Too much emphasis was placed on Mr Pearce’s own view that he did not like hospitals and did not want to go there, even though he was noted to be an individual who had difficulty expressing himself; (d) There was no clear evidence that photographs taken of the wound were shared with other agencies or the deceased’s GP, such that another view could be taken of those wounds so as to consider whether the emergency services should become involved as a matter of urgency. ”

    Source location

    John William Pearce · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share learning from the case and work with Whittington NHS Trust to improve wound-care planning and visit-frequency decisions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whittington NHS Trust currently provide the specialist tissue viability service for complex wounds to Camden residents and were directly involved in the care delivered to Mr Pearce. As the specialist service, they advise our district nursing teams on the wound care plan and frequency of visits. We are therefore sharing, and working together, with the Whittington NHS Trust in the learning from this case.”

    Source location

    2019-0068-Response-by-CNWL-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 June 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce secure sharing of photographs and other information about deteriorating wounds with specialist services and GPs during escalation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Due to the GPs using a different recording system (EMIS), the GP would not automatically be able to access the photographs. We recognise that it is not practical or necessary to share all photographs of wounds automatically with every GP. As part of the escalation where a patient’s condition is seen to be deteriorating, the requirement for sharing information, including photographs, is expected and would take place via secure email. This has been reinforced to our staff as part of the meeting in March and will be again reinforced at the follow up session in May.”

    Source location

    2019-0068-Response-by-CNWL-NHS-Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 2 June 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Automatic sharing of all wound photographs with every GP is not considered practical or necessary; photographs will be shared during deterioration escalation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Photographic evidence was regularly taken and consent to photography was recorded with all photographs being uploaded to the clinical recording system (Systmone). The process already in place ensures that any photographs can be reviewed by the Whittington NHS Trust who currently provides the specialist tissue viability service to Camden residents and were involved in the care delivered. As mentioned above, we are working with the Whittington to address the learning from this case and are due to meet with them on 9th May as highlighted above.”

    Source location

    2019-0068-Response-by-CNWL-NHS-Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 2 June 2019

    Open published response
  10. Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Daniel Alexander Jeremiah BOWEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Daniel Alexander Jeremiah BOWEN took his own life, as recorded in the inquest conclusion. Concerns included insufficient use of academic advisors to support him with late work and academic pressures, and flawed communication between university departments, his GP or counsellor, and student support services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain communication links between healthcare providers and student support services

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) With regard to communication – this appeared to be deeply flawed amongst the huge number of University departments and units. The health clinic incorporating amongst other things a pharmacy and the counselling service, was excellent offering free access to students. The system failed – Daniel was not in the link between his GP/counsellor and the student support unit. If this link had been complete I do not believe Daniel would have died when he did. ”

    Source location

    Daniel Alexander Jeremiah BOWEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce an online student-support tool providing 24/7 access and oversight of vulnerable or at-risk students.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Activity/Action | Timeline for completion Creation of a Well-being and Mental Health Strategy | September 2019 Introduction of an online student support tool to offer all students 24/7-year-round access and oversight of vulnerable or at-risk students | September 2020 (expedited to Jan 2020) Fundamental review of assessment and feedback mechanism to ensure inclusive practice, effective learning experiences and achievement of fair outcomes | June 2021 Utilise learning analytic and business intelligence software to provide real time data, informing practices and allowing for targeted interventions. | September 2021”

    Source location

    Response from University of Sussex
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reconfigure pastoral support from separate teams into coordinated thematic services with streamlined processes and clarified responsibilities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Reconfiguration of pastoral support The University is reconfiguring its student support provision from separate teams into thematic areas. The objectives of this reconfiguration are:”

    Source location

    Response from University of Sussex
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Improve professional-service data sharing, case-note access, links and active referrals across student support services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Communication and Data Sharing Following Daniel’s death, the University has reviewed and improved its data sharing and appropriate access to case notes and systems to improve the flow of information across the professional service areas. Professional service staff have improved access to necessary information, links and active referral between constituent areas such as: the Student Support Unit (that works with disabled students and those with specific learning differences and mental health conditions), Student Life and the Counselling Service, to facilitate more cohesive support to students and remove barriers to service access.”

    Source location

    Response from University of Sussex
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue working with the GP practice to improve data sharing about student patients and support risk mitigation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The University is also continuing to work with the GP’s Practice towards improving data sharing about patient/student service users, to ensure pertinent information and knowledge is available to expert practitioners, working together to support students and mitigate the risk of serious self-harm as far as it is possible to do so.”

    Source location

    Response from University of Sussex
    Page 4 · response
    Published 23 February 2024

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026