Unreliable operation of prison Code Blue emergency response
First to latest report 17 Oct 2014 — 23 Mar 2026
Reports that mention this concern
14
Times this concern has been raised
16
Stated actions linked to this concern
39
What this concern includes
Includes failures of controls specifically dedicated to the prison Code Blue emergency response, including recognition of qualifying emergencies, understanding the consequences and criteria for activation, prompt code activation, responder direction and coordination, and associated emergency equipment or immediate-response arrangements when directly tied to Code Blue operation.
What is not included
Excludes generic emergency-response, staffing, training or communication deficiencies that are not explicitly tied to the prison Code Blue system.
Excludes Code Red or other emergency codes unless the report directly links the failure to the same Code Blue response system.
Excludes clinical treatment failures after the Code Blue response has been reliably activated unless they concern a dedicated Code Blue control.
Excludes ambulance-resource, hospital-transfer or general resuscitation failures that do not concern operation of the prison Code Blue system.
Trends
Reports over time
Reports mentioning this concern, over time
Reports about this concern issued each year.
* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.
Most frequent recipients
Most frequent recipients
Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.
HM Prison and Probation Service6
Care UK2
Ministry of Justice2
Pentonville Prison2
Recipient name withheld2
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust1
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust1
G4S1
HCRG Care Ltd1
Home Office1
Langley Health Centre1
Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust1
Mitie1
Mitie Care And Custody Limited1
National Offender Management Service Equality, Rights and Decency Group1
Prison or young offender institution9
Executive agency6
NHS trust4
Ministerial department3
Prison operator3
Private limited company3
Multi-service care provider2
Type not available2
Coronial office1
Executive non-departmental public body1
Healthcare site1
Sub-organisation1
Reports and published responses 14 reports
See individual reports that have raised this concern, and the actions taken in response
Mid Kent and Medway
Concerns raised2
Lack of understanding of the consequences of issuing a Code Blue
Failure to issue a Code Blue when appropriate
This report raised 1 other concern. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked response
HM Prison and Probation Service
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.2
HM Prison and Probation Service
Issue emergency-response policy guidance and brief staff on responsibilities, code use, ambulance summoning, and defibrillator deployment.
HM Prison and Probation Service
Distribute pocket-sized cards explaining the emergency response codes to all staff.
County Durham and Darlington
Concerns raised1
Delays and uncertainty in calling an emergency ambulance and using the code blue call
This report raised 10 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked response
Durham Prison
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.5
Durham Prison
Verify current staff understanding of the Emergency Code Protocol and obtain signed confirmation.
Durham Prison
Issue pocket-sized Emergency Code Protocol cards to staff.
Durham Prison
Display Emergency Code Protocol posters prominently in all residential areas.
Durham Prison
Embed Emergency Code Protocol instruction, understanding checks, signed confirmation and card issuance in new-staff induction.
Durham Prison
Reinforce the Emergency Code Protocol through staff meetings, management briefings, notices, email, intranet publication and line-manager cascades.
Norfolk
Concerns raised1
Failure to ensure Code Blue responders know where to go
This report raised 1 other concern. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked responses
HCRG Care Services Ltd
Mr Rupert Soames
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.5
HCRG Care Services Ltd
Revise new-starter and agency-staff induction to include prison-wide shadowing.
HCRG Care Services Ltd
Develop and introduce a local induction process and checklist to record completion.
HCRG Care Services Ltd
Provide annual refresher training on prison layout and emergency attendance procedures.
HCRG Care Services Ltd
Arrange for prison officers to meet nurses at the entrance corridor and direct them to medical emergencies during patrol state.
HCRG Care Services Ltd
Ratify a joint medical-emergency response protocol with HMP Norwich.
Respondent positions A position is what a respondent says about the concern when they do not describe a specific action.3
Mr Rupert Soames
Serco no longer provides services at HMP Norwich and has no power to implement the recommendations there.
Outside remitThe respondent said that this matter was outside its role or authority.
Mr Rupert Soames
HMP Norwich and Virgin Care have the power to implement the recommendations.
Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
HCRG Care Services Ltd
Prison maps cannot be introduced because the prison governor does not permit them for security reasons.
Unable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.
West Yorkshire Eastern
Concerns raised1
Failure to use emergency codes when required
This report raised 4 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
No linked response statements
No respondent-stated action or position is linked to these concerns in the published data.
Actions and positions describe what organisations say in published responses. Implementation is not independently verified.