Recurring concern

Failure to integrate mental health services across care settings

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 17 Dec 2013•Latest report 14 Jan 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of the explicitly identified mental health service system to integrate its sections, teams or care settings, including fragmented inpatient-community arrangements, service silos, unclear cross-service ownership and absent mechanisms for coordinated care.

Not included

  • Excludes generic communication, information-sharing or coordination failures unless they directly demonstrate fragmentation or failure to integrate mental health services across care settings.
  • Excludes deficiencies within a single mental health service or clinical intervention where no cross-service integration problem is identified.
  • Excludes integration failures involving non-mental-health services unless the assertion directly concerns the integration of mental health provision.
  • Excludes generic staffing, training, documentation or facility deficiencies that are not specifically tied to integration of mental health services.
Reports
33

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
39

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
53

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

NHS England11
Department of Health and Social Care8
Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust4
Birmingham Women'S and Children'S NHS Foundation Trust2
Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust2
Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership2
NHS Birmingham and Solihull Integrated Care Board2
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board2
NHS Northamptonshire Integrated Care Board2
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust2
Office of the Chief Coroner2
Aneurin Bevan University LHB1
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust1
Birmingham City Council1
Care Quality Commission1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Dorset

    AI-generated summary

    Joanne Elizabeth Richardson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Joanne Elizabeth Richardson was found suspended by a ligature at her home on 26 September 2017 and the inquest concluded that her death was suicide. Concerns were raised about inadequate communication and lack of joined-up working between mental health teams, which meant important risk information was not shared and could lead to inaccurate risk assessments and a future death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of communication between mental-health care teams about patients' care

    Wider context from the report

    “iv. The details of that assessment were never referred to the CMHT. They were therefore not aware of how she presented or the risk assessment made by the Steps to Wellbeing Service. This information could have been very valuable to those in the CMHT who assessed her on the 23rd August and 19th September. v. Evidence was given that some of the Steps to Wellbeing Service have access to DHUFT records, namely RIO records, but not all of them do. Evidence was further given that they do not write entries in these records. Those carrying out assessments therefore are not likely to have access to all information available to DHUFT in relation to the patient. vi. Further on the 28th August 2017, Mrs Richardson contacted the Crisis Team within DHUFT stating that she had suicidal thoughts of ending her life by hanging. A call was made from the Crisis Team to the CMHT and a Community Psychiatric Nurse was spoken to. There was however no follow up after this, or any written communication with anyone involved in her care. vii. Valuable information therefore, in relation to a patient, is not being communicated to those involved in the care. There does not appear to be joined up working between the different teams within the Trust. This could therefore lead to inaccurate risk assessments and a future death. 2. I have concerns with regard to the following: i. That there is a lack of communication between the different teams in DHUFT in respect of a patient's care and as a result there could be the death of a person in the future. ”

    Source location

    Joanne Elizabeth Richardson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Adrian Jennings · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Adrian Jennings had a history of mental health issues and self-harm attempts and died on 10 December 2016 after taking a fatal cocktail of drugs and alcohol. The principal concerns included poor communication and inadequate discharge support planning between mental health services, failures to record key information when he arrived at hospital, and a policy gap concerning the reporting of high-risk absconding before triage.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a clear system for joined-up discharge planning between primary and secondary mental health services

    Wider context from the report

    “2.there was no clear system for the primary and secondary mental health services of the mental health trust ,Pennine Care, to develop a joined up discharge plan following a stay on the mental health ward; ”

    Source location

    Adrian Jennings · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish best-practice information on coordinated mental-health discharge planning and transition support.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I note your second concern regarding the ability of primary and secondary mental health services to provide a joined up discharge plan. NHS England believes that strong communication, between health care professionals, with individuals receiving care, and with their families and carers is crucial to delivering safe, effective acute mental health care pathways. This communication is particularly important when individuals are transitioning between teams or services and for ensuring a robust discharge plan is in place.”

    Source location

    2018-0111-Response-by-NHS-England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a framework for Community Mental Health Services setting out improved joint working between primary and secondary mental-health services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England is also developing a framework in 2018/19 for Community Mental Health Services which will articulate models of improved joint working between primary and secondary mental health services. This will support teams to work together to plan”

    Source location

    2018-0111-Response-by-NHS-England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise the Mental Health Act Code of Practice to set guiding principles for improving patient care, including involving carers and families in care decisions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Mental Health Act 1983 Code of Practice¹, whilst being statutory guidance for providers of services under the Act, should be observed as best practice by all commissioners and providers of services to people who may become subject to the Act. We revised the Code of Practice in 2015 and set out guiding principles to”

    Source location

    2018-0111-Response-by-Department-of-Health
    Page 1 · response
    Published 17 June 2018

    Open published response
  3. London (East)

    AI-generated summary

    Maureen Anne CAMPBELL-SCOTT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Maureen Anne Campbell-Scott died from multiple injuries after falling from a ledge at the Exchange Shopping Centre car park on 16 June 2017. The report identified concerns about delays and errors in mental health referrals, delayed communication of medication changes, prescribing that did not always follow specialist directions, and a lack of joint working between mental health services and the GP practice.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of mental health referral routing between teams

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The GP had sent the referral to the wrong team of the mental health trust. The referral then got lost between the receiving team and the correct team (the older age mental health team). This resulted in a 4 month delay in Maureen Campbell-Scott receiving an assessment. ”

    Source location

    Maureen Anne CAMPBELL-SCOTT · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of joint coordination between mental health and primary care services

    Wider context from the report

    “(5) At the time of the Inquest hearing, there had been no joint meeting between the mental health trust and the GP practice to consider the best way forward in terms of referrals to the service; prescribing during times of dynamic medication changes and general communication between the GP and the psychiatrist. ”

    Source location

    Maureen Anne CAMPBELL-SCOTT · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Process every NELFT referral and redirect misrouted referrals to the correct team within two working days.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1b | NELFT Action | All referrals into NELFT will be processed, if the referral is sent to the wrong team NELFT will ensure the referral goes to the correct team within 2 working days. | NELFT Bob Edwards, ICD for Redbridge | 18/05/18 | Completed”

    Source location

    2018-0090-Response-by-NELFT
    Page 3 · response
    Published 16 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue joint NELFT–Fullwell Cross meetings to agree the process for referrals, prescribing during medication changes and communication, including reconvening to resolve prescribing responsibilities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have had two meetings with the Fullwell Cross Practice and believe that we had agreed a process regarding the prescribing of medication to our shared patients. It was only on Tuesday of this week that we were informed that the practice had some late reservations about this specific aspect of the joint action plan. As such we are reconvening a meeting with Primary Care Colleagues to discuss the position further and agree a way forward.”

    Source location

    2018-0090-Response-by-NELFT
    Page 1 · response
    Published 16 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NELFT cannot undertake prescribing because prescribers lack an overview of patients’ full medication and may miss interactions or contraindications.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We understand that Fullwell Cross Medical Centre are now of the view that NELFT should undertake the prescribing duty, whereas our clinicians advise this is not practical for a number of reason, these broadly being the following:”

    Source location

    2018-0090-Response-by-NELFT
    Page 1 · response
    Published 16 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NELFT cannot undertake prescribing because it lacks arrangements with community pharmacists to ensure frail patients receive medication.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We understand that Fullwell Cross Medical Centre are now of the view that NELFT should undertake the prescribing duty, whereas our clinicians advise this is not practical for a number of reason, these broadly being the following:”

    Source location

    2018-0090-Response-by-NELFT
    Page 1 · response
    Published 16 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NELFT cannot use FP10 prescribing for many Older Adult Mental Health Team patients who lack capacity.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We understand that Fullwell Cross Medical Centre are now of the view that NELFT should undertake the prescribing duty, whereas our clinicians advise this is not practical for a number of reason, these broadly being the following:”

    Source location

    2018-0090-Response-by-NELFT
    Page 1 · response
    Published 16 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NELFT cannot facilitate compliance aids through local pharmacists, so medication for patients using them must be organised by GPs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We understand that Fullwell Cross Medical Centre are now of the view that NELFT should undertake the prescribing duty, whereas our clinicians advise this is not practical for a number of reason, these broadly being the following:”

    Source location

    2018-0090-Response-by-NELFT
    Page 1 · response
    Published 16 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NELFT cannot undertake FP10 prescribing for many patients in care or sheltered accommodation because those settings will not accept such prescriptions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We understand that Fullwell Cross Medical Centre are now of the view that NELFT should undertake the prescribing duty, whereas our clinicians advise this is not practical for a number of reason, these broadly being the following:”

    Source location

    2018-0090-Response-by-NELFT
    Page 1 · response
    Published 16 June 2018

    Open published response
  4. Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

    AI-generated summary

    David John Buttriss · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    David John Buttriss died at home on 9 May 2016 after cutting himself during a mental health crisis, despite medical assistance and resuscitation. The report identified communication problems between the GP and mental health services, separate healthcare record systems that limited access to relevant information, and a lack of clarity about the appropriate crisis-response pathway and the roles of different mental health teams.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clarity about crisis response pathways and service roles

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Mr Buttriss had contact with a number of health agencies in the weeks prior to his death including the Community Mental Health, Home Treatment team, GP, Out of Hours GP and Paramedics. It was clear from the evidence at the inquest that • There were Communication issues between the GP and mental health service. The mental health services had requested a patient profile from the GP on 14.5.16 which was not received. The Patient’s GP did not advise mental health services that Mr Buttriss had a mental health history pre-2009 when spoken to following his first self-referral on 14.5.16. It was not known whether this may have affected the decisions the mental health professionals took but it did and meant that his mental health issues were not known to the Cornwall Mental Health Service when they were contacted at the time of crisis • The health care records for the GP and the Mental Health services are held on different health care record systems held by the different healthcare providers. This meant that the GP did not have access to the mental health service records at the time of the consultation on by ████████ on 25th April nor did the mental health workers have information about the appointment with ████████ nor were they aware of the medication issues. The Out of Hours GP, ████████ did not have access to either the mental health or GP records and was in a difficult position when deciding how to deal with Mr Buttriss especially with regards to prescribing and sign posting to mental health professionals when she saw him in acute crisis on the 7th May. • It was clear from the evidence of the Paramedic and ████████ and the parents that there was lack of clarity of the appropriate method or pathway to deal with Mr Butriss on the night of 7th May when he was in crisis. The paramedic did speak to the Home Treatment Team for advice but as Mr Buttriss was reluctant to engage no intervention was made. There appeared to be confusions between the role of the Community Mental Health Service and the Home Treatment Team and the Home Treatment Team Out of Hours provision. ”

    Source location

    David John Buttriss · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the public website with crisis information explaining daytime and out-of-hours mental health services, helplines and team contact numbers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In direct response to your Regulation 28 report the Trust has changed the Trust’s internet page. There is now a designated section headed “I need help now” providing mental health crisis information. The internet page is accessible to all members of the public including patients and health professionals and provides information explaining the roles and responsibilities of daytime and out of hours mental health services as well as details of a number of helplines and resources available to support those in crisis. Contact telephone numbers are also provided for the Trust’s Home Treatment Teams and Community Mental Health Teams.”

    Source location

    2018-0010-Response-by-Cornwall-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 March 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and provide patients with Safety Plans containing warning signs, coping strategies, crisis contacts, care-team details and carer guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition new Safety Plans have been developed to be completed and provided to patients containing detailed crisis information for patients and their relatives, friends and carers. The plans confirm the name of team providing the care and the name of their care co-ordinator as well as the best number to contact the team and crisis numbers. The plan encourages carers to share any concerns and participate in the care and also explains that a “Nearest Relative” can speak to an Approved Mental Health Professional about their rights as a nearest relative. The plan is completed with the patient and sets out their warning signs; coping strategies and professionals or agencies to contact in a crisis.”

    Source location

    2018-0010-Response-by-Cornwall-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 March 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review out-of-hours services to determine whether changes to Home Treatment Teams are needed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust is reviewing the Out of Hours services and this is likely to result in changes to the Home Treatment Teams within the next 6 months. Once changes have been confirmed the Trust plans to meet with external providers to confirm the changes and clarify the role of the Home Treatment Teams.”

    Source location

    2018-0010-Response-by-Cornwall-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 March 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish guidelines clarifying community pathways for urgent, emergency and acute mental health services in 2018/19.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England has already published guidelines on the provision of urgent and emergency mental health provision in A&E / general hospitals, and intends to publish guidelines in 2018/19 to clarify the pathways of care for urgent, emergency and acute mental health services in the community. This includes ensuring that anyone, including health professionals, police, family members are able to access timely, 24/7 specialist care for people with emergency mental health needs.”

    Source location

    2018-0010-Response-by-NHS-England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 March 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Responsibility for reviewing Cornwall-related recommended actions was passed to the new Cornwall Integrated Urgent Care provider.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your letter was directed to Dr Dean Marshall, Medical Director for Cornwall Health. You are aware, as identified within your report, that Cornwall Health (a subsidiary company of Devon Doctors) no longer provide the out of hours service within Cornwall and that this is now provided by a partnership of Kernow Health CIC, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust and Vocare, under the name of Cornwall 111 Integrated Urgent Care Service. You sent a copy of the regulation 28 report to Kernow CIC and I too have passed the responsibility to review the actions you have identified for Cornwall to the new provider, having shared these with Dr Dean Marshall who, while no longer Medical Director for Cornwall Health, continues in the role of Medical Director for the new service.”

    Source location

    2018-0010-Response-by-Devon-Doctors
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 March 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Devon Doctors could not implement the requested Cornwall changes because it no longer provided urgent care there.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As Devon Doctors no longer provide any urgent care within the county of Cornwall we are unable to effect the potential changes you are seeking.”

    Source location

    2018-0010-Response-by-Devon-Doctors
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 March 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Some information-sharing recommendations were beyond Devon Doctors’ control.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Dr Eggleton notes that some of your recommendations regarding information sharing are beyond the control of Devon Doctors but he is assured that our clinicians are able to make accurate assessments regarding risk, to the patient and others, and they have appropriate pathways to escalate their concerns to local mental health services. In reality this often means the patient is referred to ED to see the liaison psychiatrist team, since mental health assessments in the home environment are even more difficult to arrange out of hours than they are in hours.”

    Source location

    2018-0010-Response-by-Devon-Doctors
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 March 2018

    Open published response
  5. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Siân Louise WITHERIDGE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Siân Louise Witheridge died by suicide after hanging herself at home on 30 May 2017, following admission to Highbury Grove Crisis House. Concerns included staff not having or fully reviewing her mental health records, inadequate or unenforceable risk-assessment arrangements, misunderstanding of responses about suicide plans, and disjointed care between the crisis house and crisis team.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disjointed coordination of care between crisis house and crisis team services

    Wider context from the report

    “6. The care offered to service users of Highbury Grove Crisis House and the Islington Crisis Team seemed disjointed and not dovetailed between OneHousing and Camden & Islington NHS Trust. For example, the crisis team members who gave evidence did not have any knowledge of the crisis house procedure for risk assessing before allowing leave. ”

    Source location

    Siân Louise WITHERIDGE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with OneHousing to establish shared access to clinical records and risk assessments for Highbury Grove staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We agree that Highbury Grove Crisis House staff should have access to our clinical records. To this end, we have been working with One Housing to enable members of their staff to acquire access to our IT system. We are aiming to have shared access in place in early 2018 following staff completing the relevant training and necessary checks.”

    Source location

    2017-0305-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 27 November 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce joint risk assessments completed by OneHousing and Camden and Islington staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are also going to move to undertaking joint risk assessments which will be completed by One Housing and C&I staff members. This will ensure that all risk factors as identified by all the staff caring for the patient are taken into account when formulating risk assessments and next steps. In cases where C&I staff conduct the risk assessment themselves, the Operations Manager and Team Manager for the crisis teams have reinforced to the teams the importance of providing detailed feedback to One Housing staff and agreeing a written plan of action for each patient.”

    Source location

    2017-0305-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 November 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce detailed feedback to OneHousing staff and agreement of a written action plan when crisis team staff complete risk assessments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are also going to move to undertaking joint risk assessments which will be completed by One Housing and C&I staff members. This will ensure that all risk factors as identified by all the staff caring for the patient are taken into account when formulating risk assessments and next steps. In cases where C&I staff conduct the risk assessment themselves, the Operations Manager and Team Manager for the crisis teams have reinforced to the teams the importance of providing detailed feedback to One Housing staff and agreeing a written plan of action for each patient.”

    Source location

    2017-0305-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 November 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Information-sharing problems have been rectified through ready access to relevant clinical information and established communication channels.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are aware that Highbury Grove has sent you our ‘Working Protocol’ setting out how our teams work together. As set out earlier, we accept that there have been challenges with information sharing. We are confident however that this has been rectified and Highbury Grove and staff will in the future have ready access to all the relevant clinical information.”

    Source location

    2017-0305-Response
    Page 3 · response
    Published 27 November 2017

    Open published response
  6. West Yorkshire Eastern

    AI-generated summary

    Margaret Elizabeth Conway · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Margaret Elizabeth Conway, aged 68, was admitted to Pinderfields Hospital with diarrhoea, acute kidney injury and pancolitis after being transferred from Fieldhead Hospital. She suffered a cardiac arrest and died at 0110 hours on 3 September 2016; the inquest recorded natural causes, including acute myocardial infarction and acute severe colitis. The substantive concerns related to the challenges of transferring and caring for patients with both serious mental and physical health problems across geographically and operationally separate services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Geographical and operational separation of Acute Medical Wards Mental Health Services

    Wider context from the report

    “With the assistance of Professor Stephen Curran, Consultant in Old Age Psychiatry and Clinical Lead who is based at Fieldhead Hospital and who was involved in Mrs Conway’s care, I wish to address the issue of patients experience in mental health issues and who are in-patients at Fieldhead Hospital but who have or developed physical health problems acutely which require treatment. (1) The Acute Medical Wards Mental Health Services are geographically and operationally separate. (2) Transfers of patients who are experiencing both serious mental and physical health problems can sometimes be very challenging. (3) PLT Services are now more actively involved in patients transferring to the Acute Wards. (4) Closer working such as joint ward rounds and NDT working should be explored as well as the development of a clear pathway/flowchart to facilitate closer working and in the longer-term the development and use of a shared resource with a small number of jointly funded and managed beds. Such measures would improve the care of patients with both severe physical and mental illness and also reduce the need for multiple transfers between the two organisations. ”

    Source location

    Margaret Elizabeth Conway · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. Preston and West Lancashire

    AI-generated summary

    Stephen McDermott · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Stephen McDermott was found deceased at home on 25 May 2015, having died sometime earlier as a result of the intentional application of a ligature; the inquest recorded the medical cause of death as hanging and concluded suicide. In the preceding months, he had presented repeatedly after overdoses and being recovered from train tracks, but was discharged without mental health follow-up. The principal concerns included fragmented and poorly used records, incomplete assessments and record keeping, insufficient consideration of overlapping mental health and substance misuse issues, missed opportunities for face-to-face assessment, limited information sharing between services, and an incomplete incident review.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a shared electronic mental health record system across teams

    Wider context from the report

    “1) The electronic record system is not the same across all mental health teams (Single Point of Access, Crisis Team, Mindsmatter) meaning that not all relevant records were available at each point of assessment of Mr McDermott – Mindsmatter use ‘IAPTS’ and the other teams use ‘ECR Blue’ as opposed to there being one record system for all to use and to ensure mental health records are in one place. Although ████████ gave evidence that Mindsmatter now has access to ECR Blue and the other teams have access to IAPTS, his evidence was that the system remains “clunky.” His evidence was that a new electronic system has been commissioned, but he did not know whether it was one system for all teams to have access to and/or whether the problems highlighted in this case would remain. In addition, the system is not due to be implemented for a further 18 months. He agreed that having one electronic system used by all teams would be of benefit; ”

    Source location

    Stephen McDermott · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Leah Abby Ratheram · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Leah Abby Ratheram, who had autism, foetal alcohol syndrome and a history of self-harm, died after being found hanging from a tree on 7 October 2016. The report raised concerns about the lack of coordinated care and unclear responsibility between mental health organisations, ineffective sharing of records and risk information, and uncertainty about the Mental Health Act assessment process.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unclear responsibility for patients during transfer between mental health services

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Adults aged between 18 – 25 now have mental health services provided by two organisations – Forward Thinking Birmingham and Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Trust. If a patient presents in crisis to A&E they will be seen by someone from the RAID team who work for Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Trust. If they require ongoing treatment they will be referred to forward Thinking Birmingham. There is a concern that patients will have no coordinated approach to their care at a time of crisis. It is also unclear who will ultimately be responsible for the patient, particularly during the period of transfer. ”

    Source location

    Leah Abby Ratheram · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Gloucestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Shane Dean Hardy · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Shane Dean Hardy, a 29-year-old man with a history of substance misuse and involvement with mental health services, died after placing a belt around his neck and being found hanging from a tree on 8 March 2017. The report raised concerns that people with addiction and mental health difficulties can fall between services, and that agencies supporting an individual may not share information or identify a lead agency for communication.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of services to provide assistance to individuals with addiction and mental health difficulties

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Individuals who suffer with addiction and mental health difficulties can fall between the services. Mental health services consider it not to be a mental health issue, and refer to alcohol treatment services. If the individual then refuses to engage with the latter, the individual is left receiving no assistance. ”

    Source location

    Shane Dean Hardy · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Cheshire

    AI-generated summary

    Kevin Dermott · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kevin Dermott, who had bipolar affective disorder and was serving a prison sentence, suffered episodes of mental illness while held at several prisons and died by hanging in his cell at HMP Risley on 19 May 2014. The concerns included inadequate mental health and psychiatric care, failures in care planning and communication, and failure to follow ACCT procedures; the jury concluded that deficiencies in mental health care and observation partly contributed to his death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequacies in mental health care planning and communication

    Wider context from the report

    “The seriousness of the deceased’s condition was realised whilst the deceased was at HMP Durham although probably initially misdiagnosed. During a hyponamic episode which lasted a number of weeks the deceased was for a time left in a urine soaked cell, drinking and washing from the cell toilet at a time when he needed specialist hospital treatment. The evidence showed that his illness was not properly addressed. At HMP Durham a psychiatric referral for the purpose of compiling a care plan, including a plan for therapeutic medication was never completed and he was transferred to HMP Haverigg without any steps being taken to plan health care for the future, take action to avoid a recurrence of his illness or identify and deal with a relapse should one occur. At HMP Haverigg there was inadequate mental health cover with at times only one mental health nurse and no provision for psychiatric referral. He was transferred to HMP Kirkham. A lack of suitable psychiatric care facilities at HMP Kirkham (among other things) led to a transfer to HMP Risley, where due to inadequacies of care planning and communication deficits which had been a feature of the deceased’s care whilst in prison, the fact that the deceased was relapsing into depression was not recognised. The jury concluded that the deceased’s death by hanging was partly due to deficiencies in mental health care and failure to properly observe ACCT procedures. ”

    Source location

    Kevin Dermott · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain nationally specified integrated stepped mental-health care, including consultant psychiatry, long-term care planning and continuity of care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Better integration of health care services within prisons has also been supported by the development of a national set of service specifications for primary care services (including GP and nursing services), mental health services and substance misuse services. The mental health service specification outlines the requirement for mental health services to provide an integrated stepped care model for mental health which enables patients to flow seamlessly between mild to moderate and severe and enduring stages based on clinical need and include the provision of a consultant psychiatrist. These service specifications were developed in December 2013 and set the outcomes and standards required from the services including long-term care planning and continuity of care.”

    Source location

    2016-0220-Response-by-NHS-England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 June 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Roll out the revised Person Escort Record and provide training so operational staff transfer relevant health information throughout custody transitions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England is supporting the National Offender Management Services (NOMS) with their review of the Person Escort Record (PER). This revised form ensures that all current and relevant information, including health information, is held in one document and transfers with the prisoner from police custody through to reception into prison and during any subsequent prison transfer or release. The roll out of the paper form pilot is still ongoing and work is being undertaken to ensure PER training will be available to all operational staff. This is expected to be launched by March 2017. The digital PER form is being piloted in a couple of prisons and NOMS are leading on this work.”

    Source location

    2016-0220-Response-by-NHS-England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 June 2016

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026