Recurring concern

Unreliable implementation of medication changes

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 13 Dec 2008•Latest report 8 Feb 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of controls specifically dedicated to implementing a medication change, including communicating and acknowledging the change, updating prescriptions or administration records, coordinating implementation between specialist and primary or community care, and arranging required monitoring or follow-up.

Not included

  • Excludes medication prescribing, administration, supply or monitoring failures where no medication change is involved.
  • Excludes generic communication, documentation, staffing or coordination deficiencies unless they directly impair implementation of a medication change.
  • Excludes failures concerning medication reconciliation or dosage verification when the reported unsafe condition is not implementation of a medication change.
  • Excludes clinical decisions about whether to change medication when the implementation process itself is not deficient.
Reports
22

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
24

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2008–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
35

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

NHS England3
Department of Health and Social Care2
NHS Northamptonshire Integrated Care Board2
Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust2
Belmarsh Prison1
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust1
Brook Medical Centre1
Brunswick Ward at Lindridge1
Care UK1
Carewatch (Mid Bucks)1
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust1
Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Local Health Board1
Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust1
East London NHS Foundation Trust1
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. West London

    AI-generated summary

    Tanya Rosemary Marion Oladejo · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Tanya Rosemary Marion Oladejo was found collapsed and unresponsive on her bed after a friend had not heard from her for approximately one week; police confirmed there were no suspicious circumstances. The inquest concluded misadventure, with the medical cause of death recorded as amitriptyline intoxication. The principal concern was inadequate communication between the GP practice and the responsible clinician about medication, including unilateral changes to amitriptyline prescribing that were not communicated to the responsible clinician.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate medication changes between the GP practice and responsible clinician

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The responsible clinician had made adjustments to the prescribed medication regime including allowing the GP to vary the amount of sertraline according to the patient’s presentation. (2) The GP, in fact, also on occasion titrated the amount of amitriptyline prescribed according to the patient’s presentation. (3) The responsible clinician was not made aware of the unilateral titration of amitriptyline so, accordingly, was unaware that a drug she had (in discussion with the patient) prescribed to be used as a sleeping draft was, in fact, being prescribed clearly labelled to be taken in the mornings. (4) In this case, there was a worrying lack of adequate communication between the GP practice and the responsible clinician about medication prescribed to assist in controlling Tanya’s condition ”

    Source location

    Tanya Rosemary Marion Oladejo · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review processes for recording medications across different healthcare sectors.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. Review the current processes for recording medications in the different sectors by August 2014”

    Source location

    2014-0203-Response-by-Hillingdon-Commissioning-Group
    Page 3 · response
    Published 22 April 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review processes for communicating medication information between healthcare sectors, including medication changes and treatment follow-up.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “On receiving the Initial Management Report a view was sought from the HCCG mental health commissioner, the clinical leads for NWL Mental Health Programme Board, and Hillingdon CCG medicines management lead on 19th May. It was agreed to explore the time frame and process for notification of any change of medication and follow-up sessions of treatment between GPs and CNWL lead clinician. A response from the HCCG Head of Medicines Management was received on 27th May 2014.”

    Source location

    2014-0203-Response-by-Hillingdon-Commissioning-Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 April 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss with CNWL and Hillingdon Hospitals pharmacy leads the possibility of developing a standard cross-sector medication letter or form.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. Discuss with the Pharmacy Leads in CNWL and the Hillingdon Hospitals Trust the possibility of developing one standard letter or form for use across all sectors in July 2014”

    Source location

    2014-0203-Response-by-Hillingdon-Commissioning-Group
    Page 3 · response
    Published 22 April 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Have practice pharmacists review and improve medicines-reconciliation processes in GP practices.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. Ensure our practice pharmacists review and improve medicines reconciliation processes in practices starting in July 2014 and on-going thereafter.”

    Source location

    2014-0203-Response-by-Hillingdon-Commissioning-Group
    Page 3 · response
    Published 22 April 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Circulate an anonymised Clinical Risk Alert highlighting communication lessons from the case to staff across the organisation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I must advise you that in our view the issue of particular concern in this case was one that related to inadequate communication by the GP to our clinician and it is appropriate for the CCG to respond to you on that particular point. We are satisfied that in this case our communication systems were effective. However, as an organisation we are always keen to learn from any incidents that occur and we felt it would be helpful to ensure that staff across our organisation are reminded of the importance of good communication. One of the means we have for disseminating such lessons is a Clinical Risk Alert. We will be circulating an alert in the next few weeks which will include reference to this case (in an anonymised form). I should be happy to forward a copy to you if you would find that of interest.”

    Source location

    2014-0203-Response-by-Central-North-West-London-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 22 April 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The CCG should respond to concerns about inadequate communication by the GP with the Trust clinician.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I must advise you that in our view the issue of particular concern in this case was one that related to inadequate communication by the GP to our clinician and it is appropriate for the CCG to respond to you on that particular point. We are satisfied that in this case our communication systems were effective. However, as an organisation we are always keen to learn from any incidents that occur and we felt it would be helpful to ensure that staff across our organisation are reminded of the importance of good communication. One of the means we have for disseminating such lessons is a Clinical Risk Alert. We will be circulating an alert in the next few weeks which will include reference to this case (in an anonymised form). I should be happy to forward a copy to you if you would find that of interest.”

    Source location

    2014-0203-Response-by-Central-North-West-London-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 22 April 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust considered its communication systems effective in this case and did not identify a need to change them.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I must advise you that in our view the issue of particular concern in this case was one that related to inadequate communication by the GP to our clinician and it is appropriate for the CCG to respond to you on that particular point. We are satisfied that in this case our communication systems were effective. However, as an organisation we are always keen to learn from any incidents that occur and we felt it would be helpful to ensure that staff across our organisation are reminded of the importance of good communication. One of the means we have for disseminating such lessons is a Clinical Risk Alert. We will be circulating an alert in the next few weeks which will include reference to this case (in an anonymised form). I should be happy to forward a copy to you if you would find that of interest.”

    Source location

    2014-0203-Response-by-Central-North-West-London-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 22 April 2014

    Open published response
  2. Buckinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Heather Beatrice Planner · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Heather Beatrice Planner died at Wycombe Hospital on 1 April 2019 from a gastrointestinal bleed in the context of large bowel ischaemia. The report states that she had not received her prescribed apixaban anticoagulation at home for two days before admission, and identifies concerns about medication administration, communication and record-keeping processes for carers, as well as the subsequent investigation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure individual carers read and acknowledge patient medication changes

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Changes to an individual patient’s medication are emailed to carers and a new prescription (MAR) chart is issued but there is no procedure in place to ensure that individual carers have read and specifically acknowledged any medication changes. ”

    Source location

    Heather Beatrice Planner · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026