Recurring concern

Failure to move people in mental health crisis promptly from A&E to appropriate mental-health care

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 16 Dec 2024•Latest report 28 Oct 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in arrangements for timely transfer, placement, crisis-house access, inpatient admission or other appropriate mental-health care for people held in A&E while awaiting mental-health assessment, treatment or a bed, including deficiencies in commissioning, bed availability, crisis response, escalation and coordination when these directly prolong unsafe A&E holding.

Not included

  • Excludes general emergency-department crowding, waiting-time or space deficiencies where no mental-health crisis or pending mental-health-care context is identified.
  • Excludes generic psychiatric bed shortages or community mental-health capacity failures when they do not result in prolonged A&E holding or delayed movement from A&E.
  • Excludes the quality of mental-health treatment after the person has been transferred to an appropriate mental-health setting.
  • Excludes failures in ambulance dispatch, emergency-department triage or physical security unless they directly cause prolonged holding of a person in mental health crisis pending appropriate mental-health care.
Reports
4

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
5

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2024–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
25

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

NHS England3
Department of Health and Social Care2
NHS Surrey and Sussex Integrated Care Board2

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Patricia Genders · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Patricia Genders died on 22 February 2024 after absconding from the Enhanced Observation Unit at the Royal Sussex County Hospital while detained under the Mental Health Act. She was found on the coastal side of a safety fence, taken to A&E, and pronounced dead shortly afterwards. The concerns included the use of A&E for people in mental health crisis, the absence of an agreed home-care package, the decision not to transport Patricia to a more therapeutic setting, and shortcomings in hospital security, communication and responses to absconding.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Excessive and prolonged holding of people in mental health crisis in A&E

    Wider context from the report

    “My concern is that despite significant ongoing efforts by the various partner agencies (particularly the hospital trust (University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust (“UHS”)), the trust making most of the mental health provision in this area (Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (“SPFT”)), the local authorities (West Sussex and Brighton and Hove) and the police, there is still far too much use of A&E space for those in mental health crisis, pending finding a dedicated mental health placement. My concern is that without specific investment (particularised below), from the commissioner of services, too many people will continue to be held in A&E for too long. This case shows, in quite dramatic form, some of the consequences of the use of A&E. See again the jury's conclusions, but a noisy and busy department, lit 24 hours, with limited space, may well make someone worse, and probably did here. Moreover, A&E departments cannot be made fully secure. People are coming and going; doors cannot always be monitored; and it is harder to restrain someone in a relatively public space and with fewer mental health practitioners around. Tricia was able, quite easily, to abscond. The detail of what happened next, and its impact on all, will be obvious. That impact was not just on the family but most obviously also the nurse who tried to stall her, and the member of the public and the police and fireman at the cliffs. All of these people are victims of a system which cannot do what is being asked of it. Significant steps have been made to try to improve, again, the partnership working between the relevant trusts and the police, and in trying to improve the security of the hospital. It is now not possible to hold someone under s.3 at the hospital (although that produces a new set of onwards risks. It arguably focuses minds on the need to move someone on faster, but also creates a risk that someone will simply be left with no basis for detention at all). All this, however, is just patching a fundamentally unsatisfactory situation. I took a lot of evidence about the remaining risks and the need for action. It is clear that joint working between health and social care is required (which is why I am sending this report to the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care as well as to NHS England). It is also clear that there is a limit to what the local trusts and other agencies can do on their own. The problem may be particularly pronounced in Brighton where the numbers of mentally ill people are well above the national average, but I am told it is of wider concern. The evidence I heard is that three things are required of those responsible for commissioning these services: 1.       Strengthening the 111 and Blue Light Line services so that calls are answered and people are diverted to better places where such places are available. At the moment, I was told, only about half of those calls are answered. That requires recruitment, which requires investment. 2.       An improved 24/7 crisis response, to deal with those who present at A&E out of hours. Solving that requires the establishment of teams who can formally gatekeep inpatient admissions. 3.       For a while, there will need to be an increase in the number of mental health beds available in the independent sector. This would be to provide beds and alleviate flow pressures whilst longer term, systemic change, embeds. Absent something along these lines, it seems to me there is a real risk that the events seen in this case will recur. ”

    Source location

    Patricia Genders · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to divert people in mental health crisis to suitable alternatives to A&E where available

    Wider context from the report

    “My concern is that despite significant ongoing efforts by the various partner agencies (particularly the hospital trust (University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust (“UHS”)), the trust making most of the mental health provision in this area (Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (“SPFT”)), the local authorities (West Sussex and Brighton and Hove) and the police, there is still far too much use of A&E space for those in mental health crisis, pending finding a dedicated mental health placement. My concern is that without specific investment (particularised below), from the commissioner of services, too many people will continue to be held in A&E for too long. This case shows, in quite dramatic form, some of the consequences of the use of A&E. See again the jury's conclusions, but a noisy and busy department, lit 24 hours, with limited space, may well make someone worse, and probably did here. Moreover, A&E departments cannot be made fully secure. People are coming and going; doors cannot always be monitored; and it is harder to restrain someone in a relatively public space and with fewer mental health practitioners around. Tricia was able, quite easily, to abscond. The detail of what happened next, and its impact on all, will be obvious. That impact was not just on the family but most obviously also the nurse who tried to stall her, and the member of the public and the police and fireman at the cliffs. All of these people are victims of a system which cannot do what is being asked of it. Significant steps have been made to try to improve, again, the partnership working between the relevant trusts and the police, and in trying to improve the security of the hospital. It is now not possible to hold someone under s.3 at the hospital (although that produces a new set of onwards risks. It arguably focuses minds on the need to move someone on faster, but also creates a risk that someone will simply be left with no basis for detention at all). All this, however, is just patching a fundamentally unsatisfactory situation. I took a lot of evidence about the remaining risks and the need for action. It is clear that joint working between health and social care is required (which is why I am sending this report to the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care as well as to NHS England). It is also clear that there is a limit to what the local trusts and other agencies can do on their own. The problem may be particularly pronounced in Brighton where the numbers of mentally ill people are well above the national average, but I am told it is of wider concern. The evidence I heard is that three things are required of those responsible for commissioning these services: 1.       Strengthening the 111 and Blue Light Line services so that calls are answered and people are diverted to better places where such places are available. At the moment, I was told, only about half of those calls are answered. That requires recruitment, which requires investment. 2.       An improved 24/7 crisis response, to deal with those who present at A&E out of hours. Solving that requires the establishment of teams who can formally gatekeep inpatient admissions. 3.       For a while, there will need to be an increase in the number of mental health beds available in the independent sector. This would be to provide beds and alleviate flow pressures whilst longer term, systemic change, embeds. Absent something along these lines, it seems to me there is a real risk that the events seen in this case will recur. ”

    Source location

    Patricia Genders · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create up to 85 mental health emergency departments as alternatives to A&E.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your second recommendation highlighted the need for improved 24/7 crisis response, to deal with those who present at A&E out of hours. Our 10 Year Health Plan sets out ambitious plans to create up to 85 mental health emergency departments as alternatives to A&E for people in crisis and transform neighbourhood mental health services to shift the focus from hospital to community.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Transform neighbourhood mental health services to shift crisis care from hospitals to communities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your second recommendation highlighted the need for improved 24/7 crisis response, to deal with those who present at A&E out of hours. Our 10 Year Health Plan sets out ambitious plans to create up to 85 mental health emergency departments as alternatives to A&E for people in crisis and transform neighbourhood mental health services to shift the focus from hospital to community.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Invest in local urgent and emergency mental health infrastructure, including crisis cafes, crisis houses, places of safety, emergency departments and crisis lines.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There has also been investment into a range of wider local mental health urgent and emergency care infrastructure schemes, including:”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Fund and roll out specialised mental health ambulances staffed by physical and mental healthcare professionals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Funding has also been provided for specialised mental health ambulances which are being rolled out across the country. The mental health vehicles will be staffed by both physical and mental healthcare professionals trained to deliver support on-scene or to transfer people to the most appropriate place for care.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Open more specialist Mental Health Emergency Departments alongside general Emergency Departments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England is rolling out dedicated 24/7 neighbourhood mental health centres to better support the community, opening more specialist Mental Health Emergency Departments alongside general Emergency Departments and having a 24/7 psychiatric liaison team available. A pilot programme for these centres started in October 2025 which will run until July 2026. This will be followed by an Implementation Support Programme which will roll out to sites from March 2026.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 31 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Make £75 million of additional capital available to improve local mental health bed capacity and reduce Out of Area Placements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England is aware of the issues in some systems around high bed occupancy and limited local bed availability. This is related to long lengths of stay and high numbers of patients clinically ready for discharge but unable to be discharged, leading to flow pressures across systems. To improve this, in 2025/26, NHS England made £75 million of additional capital available for local systems to invest in improving local bed capacity and reduce the use of Out of Area Placements.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish Mental Health Response Vehicles to assess and treat patients away from Emergency Departments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since August 2024, the NHS 111 mental health call option has been established around the country to support reductions in Emergency Department attendance and Mental Health Response Vehicles have also been established to see and treat patients away from an A&E setting. New integrated operational pressures escalation levels (OPEL) scoring systems have also been established for mental health, enabling greater transparency and escalation of risks across mental health pathways.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Task local health systems through operational planning guidance to improve mental health crisis-pathway flow and reduce Emergency Department waits exceeding 12 hours.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England is also taking steps to address the current operational pressures driving these issues. The 2025/26 priorities and operational planning guidance tasks local health systems to improve patient flow through mental health crisis pathways and to reduce waits of more than 12 hours in Emergency Departments.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish Mental Health Emergency Departments co-located with Type 1 Emergency Departments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Colleagues in NHS England’s South East Region have confirmed that, to improve their ability to respond to patients in mental health crisis and ensure the needs of mental health patients are met in an appropriate environment, the NHS has committed to establish Mental Health Emergency Departments (MHEDs), also described as Crisis Assessment Centres (CACs), which will be co-located with Type 1 Emergency Departments. They aim to offer calm, therapeutic settings and ensure timely onward connection into mental health inpatient provision or into broader community services.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce a mental health crisis option through NHS 111.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In relation to strengthening the 111 and Blue Light Line services, I understand you were informed that only about half of the calls are answered. We are working hard to ensure those experiencing mental health crisis receive swift care in the most appropriate setting and we have made substantial progress, including introducing the mental health option via NHS 111 and expanding 24/7 liaison mental health teams to all general acute hospitals.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 31 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deploy mental health professionals in 999 emergency operation centres and clinical assessment services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The introduction of a ‘mental health’ option when calling NHS 111 provides a crisis mental health triage service for individuals who require urgent mental health support. To supplement the NHS 111 mental health crisis triage service, we are also deploying mental health professionals in 999 call emergency operation centres and clinical assessment services to ensure people experiencing a mental health crisis are directed towards appropriate services. We continue to increase mental health expertise for ambulance”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 31 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Embed mental health professionals in ambulance emergency operation centres.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The introduction of a ‘mental health’ option when calling NHS 111 provides a crisis mental health triage service for individuals who require urgent mental health support. To supplement the NHS 111 mental health crisis triage service, we are also deploying mental health professionals in 999 call emergency operation centres and clinical assessment services to ensure people experiencing a mental health crisis are directed towards appropriate services. We continue to increase mental health expertise for ambulance”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 31 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain the national NHS 111 mental health call option to support reductions in Emergency Department attendance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since August 2024, the NHS 111 mental health call option has been established around the country to support reductions in Emergency Department attendance and Mental Health Response Vehicles have also been established to see and treat patients away from an A&E setting. New integrated operational pressures escalation levels (OPEL) scoring systems have also been established for mental health, enabling greater transparency and escalation of risks across mental health pathways.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor delivery of Sussex mental health-crisis improvement plans through joint ICB and provider oversight meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (SPFT) and Sussex ICB have set out a series of actions to deliver improvements in the care provided to people in mental health crisis. NHS England is monitoring the delivery of these plans through joint ICB and provider oversight meetings. These plans do include reference to increased capacity in 'blue light' and 111 services, alongside the delivery of 24/7 crisis response services. Should the Coroner require further information regarding this, SPFT and Sussex ICB would be best placed to provide this.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Individual trusts and local health systems are responsible for assessing and managing local mental health bed capacity.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Regarding your concern on a need for an increase in the number of mental health beds available in the independent sector. Individual trusts and local health systems are responsible for effectively assessing and managing local bed capacity through the ‘flow’ of patients being discharged or moving to another setting. The NHS Operational Planning Guidance for 2025-26 contains fewer targets across the board to focus on the fundamentals of good care. It sets a requirement for Integrated Care Boards to take action to reduce the average length of stay in adult acute mental health beds, improving local bed availability and reducing the need for inappropriate out of area placement, and to reduce waits longer than 12 hours in A&E.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 October 2025

    Open published response
  2. West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Sapphire Kathleen BERNARD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sapphire Kathleen BERNARD was detained under the Mental Health Act and waited 19 days in an A&E department for a psychiatric bed while continuing to self-ligature. After admission to Langley Green Hospital, she self-tied a ligature while on intermittent observations and died at East Surrey Hospital on 30 October 2023. The principal concerns were the lack of psychiatric beds, the unsuitability of A&E as a holding environment for people needing mental health care, and vulnerabilities in the risk assessment and observation requirements at Langley Green Hospital.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of inpatient psychiatric beds causing unacceptable A&E waits for people awaiting mental health beds

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The lack of inpatient beds leading to the unacceptable wait time in A&E for those suffering with their mental health who are awaiting a psychiatric beds. ”

    Source location

    Sapphire Kathleen BERNARD · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Commission and extend 14 additional independent-sector acute adult mental health beds to support winter pressures and capacity.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There are 302 commissioned acute adult care beds and 40 Independent sector beds. In addition to the 40 acute adult beds in the independent sector NHS Sussex and Sussex Partnership commissioned an additional 14 beds between January- March 2025 to support winter pressures. These have now been extended for Quarter one 2025/26 taking the total number of acute adult beds in the independent sector to 54. Further to this, SPFT have redesigned their acute dementia ward in Brighton & Hove to support population need which will reopen in May 2025 as an adult ward and increase the SPFT bed base by 15 adult beds.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Sussex Integrated Care Board
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with partners to improve timely discharge and support prompt admission for people awaiting mental health inpatient care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS Sussex recognises that some people wait longer than we would like to access mental health inpatient care due to patient flow and acuity of patients, NHS Sussex are working closely with partners to improve timely discharge to support prompt admission.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Sussex Integrated Care Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Measure response times for people presenting to urgent and emergency mental-health services to support faster access to appropriate care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England’s ambition is not just to improve the access point and connection to the specialist mental health points of access, but to bring significant improvements and expansion in the mental health services that ‘sit behind’ the point of access, so that people can be facilitated to access support that meets their needs and preferences in a more timely way. To this effect, we are moving at pace and are beginning to measure response times to those presenting to urgent and emergency mental health services, either in the community and/or emergency departments, with the aim of supporting these people to access appropriate care more quickly.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor patients waiting more than 72 hours in emergency departments for mental-health placements and escalate cases nationally for executive intervention.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England recognises the unsuitability of emergency departments for people experiencing mental health crisis once their immediate physical health needs have been attended to. We are aware of the increasing numbers of patients waiting in emergency departments for mental health beds and, since the time of this incident, we have introduced national level monitoring of all patients in emergency departments waiting over 72 hours for mental health placements. Due to this oversight, individual patient cases are escalated at a national level and executive input is then sought to expedite care.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide trusts and systems with action cards to reduce emergency-department waiting times, including actions for people with complex learning disabilities and autism.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “From Winter 2024/25 we have also introduced action cards for trusts and systems, articulating key actions to be taken by trusts and systems to reduce the time patients spend in emergency departments. These include specific actions for people with complex learning disabilities and autism.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    SPFT manages Sussex’s inpatient mental health bed capacity and clinically prioritises patients according to need.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “SPFT as the lead Mental Health service provider manages the inpatient bed capacity to best support the needs of all mental health patients in Sussex and they will then clinically prioritise accordingly. Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust can flex their capacity on a gender basis within their overall number of beds.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Sussex Integrated Care Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response
  3. West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Matthew Zak Sheldrick (Matty) · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Matthew Zak Sheldrick (Matty), who identified as non-binary, attended A&E in crisis on 3 November 2022 following deteriorating mental health and intense suicidal thoughts. After being assessed under the Mental Health Act and not detained, Matty left the hospital and was found suspended by a ligature in the hospital grounds. The report identified concerns including the lack of suitable inpatient beds, the unsuitability of A&E for neurodivergent patients, gaps in service provision, and shortcomings in the mental health assessment and discharge care planning.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of inpatient mental health beds causing unacceptable A&E waits

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The lack of inpatient beds leading to the unacceptable wait time in A&E for those suffering with their mental health who are awaiting beds. In Matty’s case a bed was not found for them within a 26-day period. ”

    Source location

    Matthew Zak Sheldrick (Matty) · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Increase commissioned inpatient capacity by 27 acute beds, representing a net increase of 17 beds, by the end of March 2025.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “By the end of March 2025, this will increase, including 27 acute beds (net increase 17). A business case for further beds in 2025-26, to ensure timely access to inpatient care when required, is being developed.”

    Source location

    Response from Sussex ICB
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 December 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a business case for further inpatient beds in 2025–26 to support timely access to inpatient care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “By the end of March 2025, this will increase, including 27 acute beds (net increase 17). A business case for further beds in 2025-26, to ensure timely access to inpatient care when required, is being developed.”

    Source location

    Response from Sussex ICB
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 December 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Sussex has above-average acute mental-health bed provision nationally, challenging the premise that insufficient beds explain the concern.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To note, Sussex benchmarks above average for the number of beds in acute mental health wards for benchmarked areas nationally (as of 31st March 2023). There are 25 beds per 100,000 population in Sussex, compared to a national mean of 23, where the upper quartile is 27 and the lower quartile 17.4. This position does not change when looking at weighted population whereby in Sussex the beds per 100,000 weighted population is 23.3. compared to a national mean of 18.9.”

    Source location

    Response from Sussex ICB
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 December 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Flexibility within mental-health services is the Trust’s responsibility, while NHS Sussex retains overarching commissioning responsibility.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS Sussex has oversight of all performance targets and waiting times and has assurance conversations monthly with SPFT. NHS Sussex has the overarching commissioning responsibility for the totality of the contract with the SPFT, however the flexibility within the services is the responsibility of the Trust. The Trust report to NHS Sussex on performance both internally and publicly and manage the risks within their services.”

    Source location

    Response from Sussex ICB
    Page 4 · response
    Published 19 December 2024

    Open published response
  4. West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Matthew Zak Sheldrick (Matty) · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Matthew Zak Sheldrick (Matty), who identified as non-binary, had a history of mental health difficulties and was admitted to A&E in crisis on 3 November 2022 after a previous 26-day wait for a psychiatric bed. After being assessed under the Mental Health Act and not detained, Matty left hospital and was found hanging in the hospital grounds. Concerns included shortages and long waits for mental health beds, the unsuitability of A&E for neurodivergent patients, gaps in services and discharge planning, and shortcomings in the mental health assessment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of inpatient mental health beds

    Wider context from the report

    “1. There is a lack of inpatient beds leading to unacceptable wait times in A&E for those suffering with their mental health who are awaiting beds. In Matty’s case a bed was not found for them within a 26-day period. ”

    Source location

    Matthew Zak Sheldrick (Matty) · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Commit £26 million in capital investment to open new mental health crisis centres.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As announced in the Budget, we are committing £26 million in capital investment to open new mental health crisis centres, reducing pressure on busy A&E services and ensuring people have the support they need when they need it.”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 December 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish statutory guidance requiring coordinated, safe discharge from mental health, learning disability and autism inpatient settings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is also important that, when people are discharged, this happens in a way that considers their needs on discharge and any risks to their safety. To help support safe and timely discharge decisions, the Department published statutory guidance on Discharge from mental health inpatient settings in January 2024 and which is available at: Discharge from mental health inpatient settings - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk). This sets out how health and care systems should work together to support safe discharge from all mental health and learning disability and autism inpatient settings for children, young people and adults.”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 December 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Direct systems to reduce adult acute mental health ward length of stay and improve access to local inpatient beds.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England’s 2024/25 priorities and operational planning guidance continues this focus on improving patient flow as a key priority – with systems directed to reduce the average length of stay in adult acute mental health wards in order to deliver more timely access to local beds. This is being supplemented by a further £42 million recurrent investment from 2024/25, for all Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) in the country to recommission inpatient care in line with local models that provide the best evidence of therapeutic support.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 December 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide £42 million recurrent investment for ICBs to recommission inpatient care in line with locally appropriate therapeutic models.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England’s 2024/25 priorities and operational planning guidance continues this focus on improving patient flow as a key priority – with systems directed to reduce the average length of stay in adult acute mental health wards in order to deliver more timely access to local beds. This is being supplemented by a further £42 million recurrent investment from 2024/25, for all Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) in the country to recommission inpatient care in line with local models that provide the best evidence of therapeutic support.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 December 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Local trusts and health systems are responsible for assessing and managing mental-health bed capacity and patient flow.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I expect individual trusts and local health systems to effectively assess and manage bed capacity, the ‘flow’ of patients being discharged or moving to another setting.”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 December 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Local provider-level inpatient accommodation availability falls outside NHS England’s national policy and programme remit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your Report raises concerns about the service provision and availability of services for patients suffering with their mental health, and the appropriateness of the Emergency Department as an environment for people who are autistic and/or neurodiverse to be held as they await a mental health bed. My response to the Coroner addresses the issues raised that sit within NHS England’s national policy and programme remit.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 December 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NHS Sussex ICB is the responsible commissioner for the relevant local services, with the Trust responsible for its action plan.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England’s South East regional colleagues have also engaged with NHS Sussex ICB, the responsible commissioner for the services described, on the concerns raised. We are advised that they have identified actions which include the provision of leaflets to patients and carers explaining delays in access to mental health beds, with information and signposting to support lines and apps. There are also now arrangements in place to support escalation and clinical discussion of patient flow and referral reviews. The ICB have requested an update from the Trust on their action plan, following Matty’s death.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 December 2024

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026