Recurring concern

Unreliable escalation policy for care concerns

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 1 Aug 2013•Latest report 31 Mar 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in the named or directly corresponding escalation-policy process, including policy clarity, dissemination, staff understanding, embedding, use when triggers arise and assurance that escalations are made through the required route.

Not included

  • Excludes generic escalation failures where no escalation policy or equivalent bounded policy process is identified.
  • Excludes generic staff training, communication or staffing deficiencies unless they directly impair understanding or use of the escalation policy.
  • Excludes failures in the substantive response after an escalation has been correctly made.
  • Excludes escalation processes belonging to a separately named system or pathway when that system provides the more specific supported boundary.
Reports
35

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
35

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
59

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Care Quality Commission6
Department of Health and Social Care3
Stockport NHS Foundation Trust3
Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Local Health Board2
ADS (Addiction Dependency Solutions)1
Anson Court Residential Home1
Bamford Grange Care Home1
Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1
Belong Limited1
Berkshire and Surrey Pathology Services1
Borough Care Ltd1
Calderdale Borough Council1
Cann House Care Home1
Caremark (Chiltern & Three Rivers)1
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Allan Richard Beasley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Allan Richard Beasley, who had vascular dementia, was admitted to a care home after he could no longer manage at home and experienced multiple falls. Following a further fall, he was diagnosed with cervical spine fractures, developed a chest infection, deteriorated and died. Concerns included inadequate falls-risk assessment, failures to record and escalate falls, inaccurate observation records, and incomplete monitoring and review.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Policy of delaying escalation to the falls team until three falls

    Wider context from the report

    “(6) The home has a policy that they only escalate to the falls team if a resident has had 3 falls. ”

    Source location

    Allan Richard Beasley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Frederick Sutton · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Frederick Sutton fell and broke his hip at home on 3 February 2015, may have suffered a myocardial infarction, and died approximately 12 hours after admission to hospital. The concerns included hospital staffing levels, escalation procedures, failures to read nursing notes, incompatible computerised record systems, inadequate staff training, response to cardiac arrest, medication administration, and inaccurate next-of-kin information.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to understand or implement staff-shortage escalation procedures

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Whilst there is a procedure for escalation of the shortage of staff, this was either not fully understood or not properly put into effect. ”

    Source location

    Frederick Sutton · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  3. Leicester City and South Leicestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Dayani Chauhan-Ahmed · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Dayani Chauhan-Ahmed was born in poor condition after a prolonged second stage of labour exceeding 5.5 hours and died after intensive care was withdrawn with parental consent. The substantive concerns included ineffective communication about the length of labour, uncertainty about staff knowledge and adherence to escalation procedures, and insufficient midwifery and medical availability during periods of extreme demand.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Uncertainty about staff knowledge of escalation procedures

    Wider context from the report

    “(2)The Trust escalation policy has been changed since this death, but there seemed to be uncertainty, on how well this was known by all relevant midwifery and medical staff, and in particular ensuring knowledge for new staff. Knowledge of the procedures, and adherence to the time limits set out for escalation are key to the effectiveness and the Trust should consider further how this can be robustly incorporated into working practice. ”

    Source location

    Dayani Chauhan-Ahmed · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disseminate the revised Escalation Policy electronically to all midwifery and medical staff in the Clinical Management Group.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. The Head of Midwifery is to ensure that by the end of September 2014 the Escalation Policy (the Transfer of Activity and Closure Policy) will be reviewed and will include guidance on the informal ‘SOS’ system. Once this has been completed the policy will be disseminated in accordance with normal Trust practice. Additionally, the Head of Midwifery and Deputy Clinical Director between them will ensure that a”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospital of Leicester NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 June 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Include the Escalation Policy in induction for new midwifery and medical staff and reinforce it through annual training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Moreover, so as to ensure that new staff are aware of the Transfer of Activity and Closure Policy, the Head of Midwifery and the Head of Service will ensure that it forms part of the induction of new midwifery and medical staff, respectively. In addition, staff will be reminded of this policy as part of their annual training.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospital of Leicester NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 June 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Place laminated escalation flowcharts in both delivery suites and publish key transfer actions in the quarterly Quality and Safety Newsletter.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. In addition to the above the Head of Midwifery will take further actions namely she will ensure that a laminated flowchart detailing the actions to be taken and time limits for escalation are placed within each of the two delivery suites at the Trust and she will include details of the key actions when transferring activity in the CMG’s quarterly Quality and Safety Newsletter.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospital of Leicester NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 June 2014

    Open published response
  4. Leicester City and South Leicestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Laura Page · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Laura Page experienced social stresses, sought medical support, and later took overdoses requiring psychiatric care. She died on 4 December 2012 after taking a substantial overdose. Concerns included failed community-team home visits, inadequate escalation and welfare-check thresholds, incomplete discharge arrangements, and poor inter-agency communication.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of specific time targets for escalation action

    Wider context from the report

    “Ms Page was her GP for the crisis team, who carried out an initial assessment and agreed daily home visits. On 3 separate occasions, different clinicians attended the home address but could not gain access, could not leave a note and did not attempt to contact the client as they had no telephone contact details. These failed visits were not brought to the attention of the shift supervisor that day or the Consultant team meeting the following morning. (1) The clinician response to failed visits is not robust. Further practical efforts could be considered, including door access keys where appropriate. (2) The escalation policy should be reviewed to consider specific time targets for action. (3) The threshold for requesting a welfare check should be reconsidered. (4) An analysis of failed visits and untoward outcomes across the service could be maintained and audited to ensure lessons are learnt and best practice shared. ”

    Source location

    Laura Page · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review escalation arrangements and establish specific time targets for action in the failed-visit flowchart.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “(2) The escalation policy should be reviewed to consider specific time targets for action.”

    Source location

    2014-0254-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 May 2014

    Open published response
  5. West Yorkshire (East)

    AI-generated summary

    Annie Rose GIBSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Annie Rose Gibson, an 84-year-old woman living alone, was found unresponsive at home after a fall the previous day and was pronounced dead on 13 October 2012. The post-mortem cause of death was recorded as hypothermia, immobility, and fractured pelvis with haemorrhage. The principal concern was that emergency medical assistance was not obtained despite the fall and injury, and that hospital treatment might have prevented the development of hypothermia and the death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of training protocols and Care Plans to ensure emergency-service calls and ambulance attendance despite client wishes

    Wider context from the report

    “My recommendations are that you should address situations such as this in your training protocols and Care Plans to ensure that your carers would always, notwithstanding the wishes of your client, call the Emergency Services and ensure ambulance attendance. I also recommend that the wishes of the client would have to be overridden in such a situation, in particular when relatives cannot be contacted. ”

    Source location

    Annie Rose GIBSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026