Failure to ensure clinical investigation results are reliably available, interpreted and acted upon
First to latest report 11 Sep 2013 — 25 Jun 2026
Reports that mention this concern
108
Times this concern has been raised
138
Stated actions linked to this concern
168
What this concern includes
Includes failures in the end-to-end process for managing clinical investigation results when the result is not reliably made available to, brought to the attention of, correctly checked or interpreted by, and acted upon by the responsible clinical team.
What is not included
Excludes failures concerning treatment monitoring or prescribing unless the assertion specifically concerns management of the resulting investigation result.
Excludes generic documentation, staffing, training or communication deficiencies that are not explicitly tied to the management of an investigation result.
Excludes administrative or test-ordering failures where no result-management deficiency is identified.
Excludes failures involving non-clinical items, equipment or processes unrelated to clinical investigation results.
Trends
Reports over time
Reports mentioning this concern, over time
Reports about this concern issued each year.
* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.
Most frequent recipients
Most frequent recipients
Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.
Department of Health and Social Care15
NHS England12
Care Quality Commission7
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB5
Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust4
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists4
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust4
Barts Health NHS Trust3
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency3
Recipient name withheld3
Royal London Hospital3
Ashford and St Peter'S Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust2
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust2
Bristol NHS Foundation Trust2
Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust2
NHS trust61
Healthcare site28
Ministerial department15
Executive non-departmental public body13
Health and social care service regulator7
Local health board7
Health professional body6
Private limited company5
Type not available5
Integrated care board4
Medicines and medical devices regulator3
Multi-service care provider3
Health and care professional regulator2
Health-system partnership2
Professional body2
Reports and published responses 108 reports
See individual reports that have raised this concern, and the actions taken in response
Essex
Concerns raised1
Delays and unsafe processes in investigation reporting and results access
This report raised 14 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked response
NHS England
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.1
NHS England
Conduct a GIRFT review visit to Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust’s neurology department.
Berkshire
Concerns raised1
Delays in notification of abnormal blood test results to clinicians
This report raised 6 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked response
Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.2
Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust
Improve Emergency Department blood-result turnaround through process changes spanning booking, sample transport and laboratory processing.
Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust
Upgrade the laboratory information management system to improve the reliability and connectivity of result reporting.
Teesside and Hartlepool
Concerns raised1
Failure to review pre-surgery urine test results
This report raised 11 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked response
South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.1
South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Implement an electronic patient record and scan historical records into it, including electronically signed, dated and timed clinical notes.
Avon
Concerns raised2
Failure of specialty teams to communicate investigation information and share results in a timely manner
Failure of 2-week urgent cancer pathway timeframes to include investigation reporting and referring-clinician review
This report raised 1 other concern. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked responses
Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
Department of Health and Social Care
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.10
Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
Scope administrative review of patient lists to identify parallel clinical pathways before endoscopy and assess a possible pilot.
Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
Discontinue paper radiology reports from 1 May 2024.
Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
Set up specialty-specific radiology reporting systems within existing digital platforms.
Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
Launch a joint digital strategy to converge provider-collaborative IT systems and centralise clinical information digitally.
Department of Health and Social Care
Reformed cancer waiting-time standards by introducing the 28-day Faster Diagnosis Standard and consolidating nine reporting standards into three.
Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
Recruit radiologists to fill vacancies and increase reporting capacity.
Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
Use outsourced radiology reporting to maximise reports completed within the target timeframe.
Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
Provide locum radiology cover and additional reporting sessions for existing radiologists.
Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
Scope increased radiographer resource to support radiologists.
Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
Add radiology turnaround times to the divisional risk register.
Respondent positions A position is what a respondent says about the concern when they do not describe a specific action.4
Department of Health and Social Care
Local management and implementation of national policies and procedures is assigned to NHS England and the responsible Integrated Care Board.
Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
Existing clinician checks provide a robust process for identifying relevant investigations for patients on parallel clinical pathways.
Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
Department of Health and Social Care
The Faster Diagnosis Standard is considered to address concerns by including diagnostic reporting and review times within the cancer waiting-time standard.
Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
Bristol NHS Foundation Trust
Radiology reporting cannot consistently meet the three-day cancer-pathway timeframe because of national staffing shortages, despite mitigation measures.
Unable to actThe respondent said that a constraint prevented them from taking the relevant action.
Inner West London
Concerns raised1
Failure to implement periodic clinician-led review of abnormal diagnostic results
This report raised 3 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked response
NHS England
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.1
NHS England
Publish national standards for communicating diagnostic test results after hospital discharge.
Respondent positions A position is what a respondent says about the concern when they do not describe a specific action.1
NHS England
Trusts are responsible for procedures following national guidance and for responding on handover arrangements and clinician-led review of abnormal blood results.
Redirects responsibilityThe respondent said that another organisation was responsible for deciding or taking action.
East London
Concerns raised1
Delays in reporting radiological chest x-rays
This report raised 4 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked response
Barts Health NHS Trust
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.2
Barts Health NHS Trust
Increase Emergency Department imaging-reporting radiologists and radiographers to near-full capacity.
Barts Health NHS Trust
Recruit further imaging reporters to reduce reporting turnaround times.
Respondent positions A position is what a respondent says about the concern when they do not describe a specific action.1
Barts Health NHS Trust
The chest radiograph was reported within the department’s ten-working-day timeframe, despite being completed outside normal working hours.
Disputes the concernThe respondent disagreed with part of the concern or the basis for it.
North Yorkshire and York
Concerns raised1
Failure to ensure swab results are reviewed
This report raised 9 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked response
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.1
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Require staff to record recent post-discharge contacts, advice, investigations and clinicians in PPM+, and forward review requests to outpatient teams.
Birmingham and Solihull
Concerns raised1
Failure to highlight high clozapine results in routinely used clinical notes
This report raised 7 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Linked response
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
Respondent positions A position is what a respondent says about the concern when they do not describe a specific action.1
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust
Existing ICE access, abnormal-result indicators and pharmacy reporting provide the strongest safeguards for recording and responding to high clozapine levels.
Existing arrangements considered sufficientThe respondent said that existing arrangements were sufficient, so no further action was needed.
Lincolnshire
Concerns raised1
Failure to investigate a significantly abnormal respiratory acidosis blood gas result
Linked response
United Lincolnshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Stated actions An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.2
United Lincolnshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Require ED clinicians acknowledging blood gas results to document abnormalities requiring management and the planned further management.
United Lincolnshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Have clinical audit teams in both ULHT departments audit blood gas results and documentation to assess whether the learning and actions are embedded.
West Yorkshire Eastern
Concerns raised1
Delays in urgent blood sample delivery and reporting
This report raised 14 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
No linked response statements
No respondent-stated action or position is linked to these concerns in the published data.
Actions and positions describe what organisations say in published responses. Implementation is not independently verified.