Epilepsy, 19 Sep 2013 – 19 Jun 2026

Epilepsy-related Prevention of Future Deaths reports

Last year7 Sep 2025 – 7 Sep 2026

Custom range

Based on PFD publication date. Dates are available up to the published snapshot: 7 Sep 2026. Preset periods end on this date.

9All reports 3SUDEP 6Non-SUDEP

Select SUDEP or Non-SUDEP to filter concerns and reports. Counts are PFD reports, not deaths.

About this dataset

We searched all 6,433 reports in the published corpus using a fixed text-search method, then assessed 317 candidates against source-based inclusion criteria. Ninety reports were included. Epilepsy had to be materially relevant to the death or a substantive coroner’s concern; incidental mentions were excluded.

Eligibility and SUDEP assignment were assessed with GPT-5.6 Sol and checked for valid source quotations. Assignment uses a balance-of-probabilities threshold: SUDEP or non-SUDEP must be more likely than not on the report’s evidence. The exact term SUDEP need not appear. Genuinely unclear eligible reports remain in All only. These are model-assisted documentary assessments, not independently validated clinical diagnoses.

The search can miss reports with sparse terminology or incomplete source text. This dataset does not represent all epilepsy deaths. Recurring concerns and responses are taken from the existing published evidence. Published corpus snapshot: 7 September 2026. Cohort selection updated 5 November 2026. The title shows the first and last included reports’ publication dates.

The recurring concern appears in fewer than two reports in this selection. Showing all reports in this selection.

Reports over time

Matching reports published each year within the selected date range.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Matching reports sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care2
Guy'S and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust1
NHS England1
Office of the Chief Coroner1
Parents of the deceased1
Sundon Medical Centre1

Most commonly raised concerns

SUDEP 3 reports 7 Sep 2025 – 7 Sep 2026

Reset
  1. No recurring concerns match this selection

    No concern appears in at least two reports in this selection. Try a wider date range or another classification. Individual reports remain available below.

Reports matching this classification

7 Sep 2025 – 7 Sep 2026 · 3 reports

Classification: sudep
Reset

Showing all concerns and their linked actions and positions from reports in this date range for sudep. Select a recurring concern above to narrow the evidence.

Actions and positions describe what recipients stated in published responses. Select a statement to read its source wording.

  1. Bedfordshire and Luton

    AI-generated summary

    Paul Robert Joseph NASH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Paul Robert Joseph NASH, who had epilepsy secondary to HSV encephalitis, was found deceased at home on 23 October 2025 after apparently suffering a seizure during the night. He had run out of Carbamazepine and missed three doses. The concerns included that the GP surgery did not appear to be told that he had completely run out of medication and did not prioritise the prescription for same-day collection, as well as wider difficulties for epilepsy patients in obtaining sufficient medication supplies.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to convey information about critically depleted seizure medication to the GP

    Wider context from the report

    “1. During the phone call with the Surgery on 21 October 2025, HEADWAY made it clear to the Surgery that the Deceased had run out of his Carbamazepine (seizure medication) completely and, although he had taken that morning's dose, if he did not receive more medication that day he would not have his evening dose or any other doses. Although HEADWAY was reassured that the GP would be notified that the Deceased had run out of his seizure medication, this fact did not appear to have been conveyed to the GP and the prescription was not prioritised to ensure he received it the same day. ”

    Source location

    Paul Robert Joseph NASH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to prioritise prescriptions for same-day supply of critically depleted seizure medication

    Wider context from the report

    “1. During the phone call with the Surgery on 21 October 2025, HEADWAY made it clear to the Surgery that the Deceased had run out of his Carbamazepine (seizure medication) completely and, although he had taken that morning's dose, if he did not receive more medication that day he would not have his evening dose or any other doses. Although HEADWAY was reassured that the GP would be notified that the Deceased had run out of his seizure medication, this fact did not appear to have been conveyed to the GP and the prescription was not prioritised to ensure he received it the same day. ”

    Source location

    Paul Robert Joseph NASH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Difficulties obtaining sufficient quantities of epilepsy medication for continuous access

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The Deceased's Consultant Neurologist indicated that many epilepsy patients across the country currently experience difficulties in obtaining sufficient quantities of medication to ensure optimum seizure control i.e. it is difficult for them to obtain batch quantities to ensure they always have access to some in the event that they find they are running low or there are delays in the pharmacy processing a repeat prescription (apparently in some areas processing can take up to 10 days). ”

    Source location

    Paul Robert Joseph NASH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce a formal escalation process prioritising requests for critical medicines, including same-day clinical review and urgent clinician alerts.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Critical medication escalation process- the practice is introducing a formal process for identifying and escalating requests relating to critical medications including anti-epileptic medication. Where a patient reports that they have run out, or are about to run out of such medication, this will be treated as a priority medication safety issue and escalated promptly for same day review by an appropriate clinical or prescriber. Where such a task is sent to the Duty Clinician it will be flagged as urgent and an instant message will also”

    Source location

    Response from Sundon Medical Centre
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train reception and administrative staff to recognise critical medicines, manage split-strength requests, escalate concerns and verify communications.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Staff training on critical medications and escalation. Reception and administrative staff have received and will continue to receive further training on:”

    Source location

    Response from Sundon Medical Centre
    Page 3 · response
    Published 26 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review implementation of the medication-safety changes and monitor compliance with urgent-medicine, dosage-wording, written-request and escalation procedures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Audit and Review. The practice will undertake a review of these changes after implementation to ensure they are embedded and effective. This will include monitoring compliance with the new process for urgent critical medicines, checking the use of clear dosage wording for split-strength prescriptions and reviewing whether staff are following the written request and escalation process consistently.”

    Source location

    Response from Sundon Medical Centre
    Page 4 · response
    Published 26 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Clearly communicate the urgent status of critical-medication prescriptions to pharmacies to support prompt dispensing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Pharmacy communication for urgent critical medication. Where a patient has run out of critical medication and an urgent prescription is issued, the practice will ensure that the urgent nature of the request is clearly highlighted with the pharmacy to support prompt dispensing.”

    Source location

    Response from Sundon Medical Centre
    Page 4 · response
    Published 26 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Consider repeat dispensing, batch prescribing, or one-off reserve prescriptions for suitable patients at risk of running out of critical medication.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Repeat dispensing / batch prescribing for suitable patients. For patients prescribed long term critical medication, the practice will consider whether repeat dispensing or batch prescribing with future dated repeat prescriptions for up to six months is appropriate, particularly where patients may have memory difficulties, cognitive impairment, or other vulnerabilities that place them at risk of running out of medication. This will be assessed on a case by case basis to ensure suitability and safety. Where patients have experienced difficulty obtaining medication on time the practice will consider prescribing a one-off extra medication prescription to provide patients with a month of their time critical medication in hand.”

    Source location

    Response from Sundon Medical Centre
    Page 3 · response
    Published 26 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with the pharmacy sector to improve awareness of emergency supply provisions and patients’ access to emergency medicines.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Department recognises that awareness of emergency supply provisions amongst both patients and pharmacy staff can be improved. The Department is committed to working with the pharmacy sector to improve awareness and ensure patients can access emergency supplies when necessary to prevent harm or death. We are currently in consultation with the sector representative body, Community Pharmacy England, on the 2026/27 Community Pharmacy Contractual Framework. As part of this consultation we will take into account learnings from Paul Nash’s death.”

    Source location

    2026-0161 - Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 4 · response
    Published 26 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inform epilepsy patients about the Charlie Card emergency-supply self-advocacy tool.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Informing Epilepsy Patients of the Charlie Card - this is a self advocacy tool designed to assist individuals with epilepsy who find themselves without their regular anti-seizure medications. It highlights the legal framework under the Human Medicines Regulations 2012, allowing patients to request an emergency supply of anti-seizure medications from any pharmacy without a prescription, provided certain conditions are met. The card serves as a reminder to pharmacists of their legal duties and aims to ensure that patients can access life- saving medications quickly and efficiently. The Charlie Card is available free through the charity shop of SUDEP Action and individuals can also download a copy.”

    Source location

    Response from Sundon Medical Centre
    Page 3 · response
    Published 26 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide clear patient information about prescription processing and pharmacy dispensing times through the website and reception.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Clear patient information regarding repeat turnaround times The practice will continue to ensure that patients are clearly informed that repeat prescriptions require a two working days for surgery processing and that pharmacies require additional time for dispensing. This information will be displayed on the website and in reception to encourage timely ordering and reduce the risk of medication running out.”

    Source location

    Response from Sundon Medical Centre
    Page 4 · response
    Published 26 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NHS England and delegated Integrated Care Boards commission and performance-manage general practice, including addressing persistent performance concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “General practice is commissioned and performance-managed by NHS England, with responsibility delegated to Integrated Care Boards, who are expected to work with practices to provide support and agree improvement plans where performance concerns arise. Where issues persist, commissioners can intervene and use contractual levers, including remedial action, to ensure safe and appropriate patient care.”

    Source location

    2026-0161 - Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing urgent-supply arrangements, including pharmacist emergency supplies and NHS 111 referrals, provide routes to obtain urgently needed medicines.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Department recognises that delays in prescriptions being sent by GPs, such as in Paul Nash’s tragic case, can result in patients being left without vital medication. Provisions are in place to prevent patients being left in this situation. If a patient needs to access an urgent supply of their medicines, then there are a range of options available, which can be found at Emergency prescriptions - NHS.”

    Source location

    2026-0161 - Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 26 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing regulations and NHS pharmacy terms require community pharmacies to dispense NHS medicines with reasonable promptness and notify patients of delays.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Department recognises that delays in pharmacies processing repeat prescriptions can result in patients unexpectedly running out of vital medicines. That is why all community pharmacies providing dispensing services for NHS patients in England are required to dispense medicines for patients on demand with reasonable promptness. This is set out in regulations and within the terms of service for all pharmacies on the NHS Pharmaceutical list.”

    Source location

    2026-0161 - Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 March 2026

    Open published response
  2. Sefton, St Helens and Knowsley

    AI-generated summary

    Drew John GREAVES-PIMBLETT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Drew John Graves-Pimblett, aged 26 and with a history of epilepsy, was found unresponsive and not breathing at home on 22 March 2025. An ambulance was initially stood down after telephone triage, but police later commenced CPR and Drew was pronounced deceased. The inquest concluded that he died from Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP), related to epilepsy and natural causes. The principal concern was that call handlers lacked sufficient guidance and did not ask probing questions about breathing, body temperature, turning Drew over, or stiffness before deciding that resuscitation would not be effective.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of national pathway guidance for call handlers on assessing whether someone is breathing and whether CPR is required

    Wider context from the report

    “Though a telephone triage is always challenging and subjective, there appears to be a gap in the national pathways for call handlers. Consideration as to further guidance and assistance to call handlers on probing questioning for fundamental aspects such as breathing and where and how to best show how cold the body is. If someone is not breathing to ask how they know and/or techniques such as head to the chest, where to take a pulse etc. for the call handler to make a more informed decision as to whether someone is breathing and if CPR is required. When a call is made to NWAS, often it is by someone not thinking straight and so specific questions on breathing and general presentation may be of assistance in assessing the call. ”

    Source location

    Drew John GREAVES-PIMBLETT · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of national pathway guidance for call handlers on assessing how cold the body is

    Wider context from the report

    “Though a telephone triage is always challenging and subjective, there appears to be a gap in the national pathways for call handlers. Consideration as to further guidance and assistance to call handlers on probing questioning for fundamental aspects such as breathing and where and how to best show how cold the body is. If someone is not breathing to ask how they know and/or techniques such as head to the chest, where to take a pulse etc. for the call handler to make a more informed decision as to whether someone is breathing and if CPR is required. When a call is made to NWAS, often it is by someone not thinking straight and so specific questions on breathing and general presentation may be of assistance in assessing the call. ”

    Source location

    Drew John GREAVES-PIMBLETT · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide CPR Toolkit Training to NHS Pathways health advisors, including the ‘No, No, Go’ approach and telephone-guided CPR initiation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Also, of relevance to this particular case, in terms of additional training regarding the assessment of consciousness and breathing, health advisors utilising NHS Pathways who have completed the core training are provided with ‘CPR Toolkit Training’. This encompasses what is called the ‘No, No, Go’ approach where, if the patient is not conscious or not breathing (either normally or at all), health advisors are trained to proceed immediately to the initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) as presented by the system. This additional training seeks to ensure that health advisors are supported to proceed quickly to the required life supporting advice.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 4 · response
    Published 9 January 2026

    Open published response
  3. Dorset

    AI-generated summary

    Amber Grace Walker · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Amber Grace Walker, who had epilepsy and uncontrolled nocturnal tonic-clonic seizures, was found deceased at home on 19 April 2023. A post-mortem examination identified Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) as the medical cause of death. The concerns were that SUDEP and Amber’s individual risk, including the implications of declining increased medication, were not discussed with her, and that SUDEP discussions and related training for doctors were not consistent or universal.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to consistently discuss SUDEP with patients with epilepsy

    Wider context from the report

    “i. Doctors can be reluctant to discuss SUDEP with patients and/or presume it is a discussion that has been had at previous appointments(s) with colleagues that does not need repeating. There are tools, such as the SUDEP Action-produced “SUDEP Checklist”, that can facilitate such a discussion, but they are not used universally. The SUDEP Checklist can be used by any medical practitioner who may come into contact with a patient with epilepsy. Discussions about SUDEP ensure that patients are aware of the general risks of SUDEP, the risks that are specific to the patient and the measures that can be taken to mitigate the risk. ”

    Source location

    Amber Grace Walker · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of SUDEP training for doctors

    Wider context from the report

    “ii. SUDEP is not covered in the medical training of doctors, despite is being the leading cause of death in patients with a diagnosis of epilepsy. It is not only neurologists that will encounter patients with epilepsy where a discussion regarding SUDEP may be required, as demonstrated by Amber’s experience. ”

    Source location

    Amber Grace Walker · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Medical schools, royal colleges and the GMC determine and oversee medical education curricula and standards, rather than the department.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In relation to the education and training of doctors, individual medical schools set their own undergraduate medical curriculum. These have to meet the standards set by the General Medical Council (GMC), which monitors and checks to make sure that the standards are maintained.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 4 · response
    Published 23 October 2025

    Open published response

Export data

Your Excel file will include all 3 matching reports.

Classification: sudep7 Sep 2025 – 7 Sep 2026 (Publication date)Recurring concern: all recurring concerns
Choose the tabs to include