Recurring concern

Delays in ambulance-to-hospital patient handover

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 21 Jan 2014•Latest report 18 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes delays, target failures, capacity pressures, admission barriers and ineffective improvement measures that directly concern the ambulance-to-hospital patient handover process.

Not included

  • Excludes delays in ambulance response that are not directly linked to hospital handover.
  • Excludes generic hospital staffing, social care, patient-flow or capacity deficiencies unless the report directly ties them to ambulance-to-hospital handover delays.
  • Excludes clinical handover failures between hospital wards or other services that do not concern ambulance-to-hospital patient transfer.
  • Excludes safety monitoring and clinical care while a patient waits where the assertion does not itself identify delayed handover.
Reports
77

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
86

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
337

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care43
Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust20
NHS England18
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB14
Welsh Government9
Aneurin Bevan University LHB4
Care Quality Commission4
Conwy County Borough Council4
Denbighshire County Council4
Flintshire County Council4
NHS West Yorkshire Integrated Care Board4
Wrexham County Borough Council4
East Midlands Ambulance Service NHS Trust3
Gwynedd Council3
Isle of Anglesey County Council3

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

    AI-generated summary

    Geoffrey Gordon Fuller · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Geoffrey Gordon Fuller, aged 91, called an ambulance for a dislocated hip and experienced a 13-hour delay, including prolonged periods waiting for an ambulance response and hospital handover, during which he suffered pain and was unable to move. He later died at Royal Cornwall Hospital from a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, which the report states was unrelated to the dislocated hip and to which the delay contributed no more than minimally. The principal concerns were persistent ambulance handover delays, emergency department overcrowding, and insufficient social care provision, with associated risks to patient care and ambulance availability.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete ambulance handovers within the 15-minute target

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The court noted that the NHS national target is for ambulances to handover patients to hospital is within 15 minutes of arrival. 2. The total ambulance delay on 7 July 2025 for Mr Fuller was approximately 13 hours, involving delays in both response and handover. 3. The delay in ambulance response was 10 hours and 12 minutes, during which time Mr Fuller was in pain and unable to move due to a dislocated hip. 4. On arrival at Royal Cornwall Hospital (RCHT), Mr Fuller spent a further 2 hours and 52 minutes before being handed over to the emergency department. 5. On 7 July 2025, at RCHT, the average handover time was two hours, 24 minutes with over 211 hours of ambulance availability lost to these handover delays. This is the equivalent of approximately 19 double crewed ambulance (DCA) shifts lost to delays (based on a standard 11-hour shift). 6. Data for the two months before Mr Fuller’s death reveals average handover delays at RCHT of 1 hour and 26 minutes for May 2025, and 1 hour and 27 minutes for June 2025 (beyond the 15 minute target). 7. Recent data indicates the picture has not improved. Significant average handover delays at RCHT were recorded for every month of 2026 to date (beyond the target 15 minutes). The data for May 2026 indicates an average handover delay of 1 hour and 22 minutes beyond the 15-minute target. 8. The day before this Inquest, 7 June 2026, SWAST recorded average handover delays at RCHT of 1 hour and 10 minutes. 9. These handover delays lead to the unavailability of ambulances to respond to emergency calls. Furthermore, the average handover delays conceal spikes such as that which led to the long delay in this case. Such long delays increase the risk of mortality. ”

    Source location

    Geoffrey Gordon Fuller · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. Coventry

    AI-generated summary

    Roman Louie BARR · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Roman Louie Barr suffered an asthma attack on 14 December 2023 and died after no ambulance was available for several hours, leading his family to transport him to hospital. The principal concerns were limited awareness and follow-up of excessive salbutamol use, ambulance handover delays affecting emergency availability, risks to families transporting critically unwell patients, and unclear NHS Pathways triage wording.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in ambulance handover reducing emergency ambulance availability

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Ambulance handover delays affecting emergency availability Prolonged ambulance handover times at local hospitals were a significant factor in no ambulance being available at the time help was sought, reducing emergency response capacity during periods of high demand. ”

    Source location

    Roman Louie BARR · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the Release to Rescue approach across trusts, beginning handover at 30 minutes and completing it by 45 minutes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To ensure timely patient care and release ambulances back into the community, the plan mandated the “Release to Rescue” approach which will be continually implemented across all trusts. This requires the handover process to begin at 30 minutes and be completed by 45 minutes. There is significant progress still to be made on this commitment, the most recent performance figures show that average handover time in the West Midlands Ambulance Service was 54 minutes and 30 seconds. NHSE continues to work with the most challenged trusts, with the Medium-term Planning Framework (2026/27–2028/29) setting further ambitions for acute and ambulance collaboration to further improve performance, including progress toward the 15-minute handover standard and reducing pressure in hospitals.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish urgent and emergency care and long-term health plans prioritising shorter ambulance responses, reduced handover delays, improved flow and expanded urgent-care access.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England recognises the ongoing pressures across urgent and emergency care, including ambulance services. To improve the quality and timeliness of patient care, the Department of Health and Social Care and NHS England published the 2025/26 Urgent and Emergency Care Plan (June 2025) and the 10-Year Health Plan for England: Fit for the Future (July 2025). These plans set out key system priorities: reducing ambulance response times, eliminating handover delays over 45 minutes, ending corridor care, improving hospital flow and discharge and expanding urgent care access across primary, community, and mental health settings. Over £370 million in national capital funding supports these improvements. The plans also commit to shifting focus from treatment to prevention, reducing pressure on urgent and emergency care.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 18 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the Release to Rescue programme and work with regional partners to reduce ambulance handover delays to a 45-minute maximum.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To ensure timely patient care and release of ambulances back into the community, the 2025/26 Urgent and Emergency Care Plan mandates the “Release to Rescue” approach. The “Release to Rescue” approach will be triggered once a handover reaches 30 minutes and means that all ambulances must complete their handover and leave the hospital site at 45 minutes. NHS England continues to work with ICBs, acute trusts, and ambulance services to deliver the 45-minute maximum handover requirement, strengthen urgent community care, and improve hospital flow and discharge. Risks associated with long community waits for ambulances are regularly discussed at national forums to support shared understanding and coordinated action across the urgent and emergency care system.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 18 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Take regulatory enforcement action against ambulance services that cannot meet emergency response times for critically unwell patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have given consideration to point 3 above. In inspections of NHS Ambulance Services across England in recent years, we have had cause to take enforcement action where ambulance services are unable to meet response times for those patients who are critically unwell – typically those, as with Mr Barr, who would meet the category 1 or 2 threshold for requiring an emergency ambulance in a mean average time of 7 or 18 minutes or less respectively.”

    Source location

    Response from Care Quality Commission
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Take regulatory action against NHS trusts where emergency departments do not accept ambulance handovers within safe and responsive times.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have also taken regulatory actions against NHS trusts where the emergency departments are not taking handover from ambulance crews in safe and responsive times. Equally this was with recognition of how delays in getting people discharged home who were waiting in the same trusts’ hospital wards without criteria to reside was the critical factor in not having beds to admit patients who required them in an”

    Source location

    Response from Care Quality Commission
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NHS England will address the report’s other concerns in a separate response.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The report raises concerns over the continued pressure caused by prolonged ambulance handover times at local hospitals which reduced emergency capacity to respond in the community, risk of patient’s family transporting Roman to hospital themselves and clarity of NHS Pathways triage wording. NHS England will reply separately on other concerns in your report.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NHS Pathways and ambulance-service concerns fall outside the Royal College of General Practitioners’ remit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Suggestions for concerns regarding the NHS Pathways and Ambulance services are beyond the remit of the Royal College of General Practitioners.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal College for GP's
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 March 2026

    Open published response
  3. Coventry

    AI-generated summary

    Roman Louie BARR · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Roman Louie Barr suffered an asthma attack on 14 December 2023 and died after information indicating the need for an urgent ambulance response was not obtained, no ambulance was available for several hours, and his family transported him to hospital. The principal concerns included limited awareness and monitoring of excessive salbutamol use, ambulance handover delays affecting emergency availability, risks when families transport critically unwell patients, and unclear NHS Pathways triage wording.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in ambulance handover at local hospitals

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Ambulance handover delays affecting emergency availability Prolonged ambulance handover times at local hospitals were a significant factor in no ambulance being available at the time help was sought, reducing emergency response capacity during periods of high demand. ”

    Source location

    Roman Louie BARR · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. North Wales (East and Central)

    AI-generated summary

    Angela Frances Darlow · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Angela Frances Darlow suffered a stroke at home on 6 January 2025, but an ambulance arrived 23 hours and 20 minutes later. She was diagnosed with an extensive left middle cerebral artery infarct, was not suitable for thrombectomy because of the delay, and died in hospital on 7 June 2025. The principal concern was the prolonged ambulance delay, in the context of high demand, hospital handover delays, patient flow and limited social care provision, resulting in lost opportunities for investigation and potential treatment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Significant delays in hospital ambulance handover

    Wider context from the report

    “Category of Concern – Emergency Services Related Death; Ambulance Delays (resources) Angela Darlow was suffering from symptoms of a stroke at home during the afternoon of 6 January 2025. Her husband immediately contacted the Welsh Ambulance Service via 999. Given the significant demand at this time, it took 23 hours and 20 minutes for an emergency ambulance to attend. The calls made to the Trust were correctly categorised. By the time Angela arrived at the nearest hospital, The Countess of Chester, she was outside the time for investigations for thrombectomy. At the time in question demand was unprecedented. This is reflected by the 23 hour and 20 minute delay in ambulance arriving. There were significant hospital handover delays at the time which added to the demand on the Trust. The facts in Angela’s death speak for themselves. I continue to remain concerned about the time is taking for ambulances to arrive in the context of the multifactorial reasons for this which include patient flow in hospitals and limited social care provision. People are dying due to these issues and yet we are no closer to improvement. ”

    Source location

    Angela Frances Darlow · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update and issue ambulance patient handover guidance to health boards for immediate delivery.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Improving ambulance patient handover performance”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish and operate a clinically led national taskforce to improve safe and timely ambulance handover and address delays exceeding 45 minutes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I set up a clinically-led National Handover-45 Taskforce last year to support delivery of a recommendation made by the Ministerial Advisory Group on NHS Performance and Productivity to eliminate ambulance patient handover delays of more than 45 minutes. The taskforce has brought together senior clinical, operational and system leaders from across NHS Wales and has overseen focused improvement activity, shared good practice, and provided national clinical leadership on safe and timely handover.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 2 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide additional financial and expert support to Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board to improve service quality, safety, flow, access and governance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board is at the highest level of escalation – special measures – because we have serious concerns about how the health board is run; about the quality and safety of the service; about the performance of services and about timely access to care.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 4 · response
    Published 2 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Direct delivery of health and social care services is outside Welsh Ministers’ responsibility.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Welsh Ministers set the strategic direction for health and care services and hold NHS organisations to account. Welsh Ministers are not responsible for the delivery of health or social care services. Health boards and NHS trusts are responsible for planning, commissioning and delivering services for the population of their respective areas within the national policy framework set by Welsh Ministers.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Health boards and NHS trusts are responsible for planning, commissioning and delivering services within the national policy framework.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Welsh Ministers set the strategic direction for health and care services and hold NHS organisations to account. Welsh Ministers are not responsible for the delivery of health or social care services. Health boards and NHS trusts are responsible for planning, commissioning and delivering services for the population of their respective areas within the national policy framework set by Welsh Ministers.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 March 2026

    Open published response
  5. Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton

    AI-generated summary

    Liliane Andree BOWDEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Liliane Andree Bowden died at Oak View Care Home on 23 September 2024 from bronchopneumonia, with vascular dementia and recent falls making substantial contributions. The inquest raised concerns about a prolonged ambulance delay following her fall, in the context of ambulance demand and hospital handover delays, particularly for elderly or vulnerable Category 3 patients.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain ambulance availability during hospital handover delays

    Wider context from the report

    “During the course of the inquest evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern, relating to ambulance delay on a callout just under two weeks prior to Liliane Andree Bowden’s death. It is right to immediately acknowledge that the ambulance service, South Central Ambulance Service, provided me with a detailed explanation. In this instance the initial call was at 11.40 with a second call at 13.29, a third call at 15.53 and a fourth call (seeking an estimated time of arrival of the ambulance) at 17.29. Liliane, 90, had fallen. Category 3 was called at around,13.29, category 3 was confirmed at around 16.26. A specialist paramedic was at the deceased’s bedside at 17.35 and an ambulance was requested at 18.00. At that time there was demand on the ambulance service (the Enhanced Patient Safety Procedure had been in place from 23.15 the previous night until 11.35 on the day of the call) and there were significant hospital handover delays at hospital: apparently the call centre log records up to 25 ambulances held outside hospital waiting to hand over patients that afternoon, at 18.10 there were 8 ambulances at hospital waiting to hand over patients, one of which had been waiting for 4 hours and 40’ to hand over their patient. It was estimated that an ambulance would not be available for seven hours. In the event an ambulance eventually arrived at 23.30. The response timeframe for a category 3 call is for at least 9 out of 10 calls to be within 120’. It follows that although the Enhanced Patient Safety Procedure was activated the previous night, following deactivation of the Enhanced Patient Safety Procedure a large contingent of ambulances was taken out of action for substantial periods by handover issues. Quite apart from a repetition of such circumstances potentially affecting category 1 and 2 calls, there must be significant risk in the case of an elderly and/or vulnerable person in Category 3 having an extended wait, particularly if there has been a head injury, as is often the case. ”

    Source location

    Liliane Andree BOWDEN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue working with hospitals to deliver handover-time targets.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The SCAS and PHT CEO’s jointly presented the work our teams had carried out to the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives to showcase the excellent achievements in reducing handover delays. Each year we are required to submit an annual plan to NHS England on how we will deliver our services. For 2025/26, our plan included average handover times at hospitals across our geography. Each hospital was asked to sign up to the improvement and for the year to date we have delivered on or below plan across our region. There is a requirement within the next 3 years for all hospitals to reach the 15 minute handover target and have not delay over 45 minutes. We will continue to work with all hospitals to deliver these targets and we will submit our plan to NSHE in February for 26/27.”

    Source location

    Response from South Central Ambulance Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Submit the 2026/27 service plan to NHS England in February.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The SCAS and PHT CEO’s jointly presented the work our teams had carried out to the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives to showcase the excellent achievements in reducing handover delays. Each year we are required to submit an annual plan to NHS England on how we will deliver our services. For 2025/26, our plan included average handover times at hospitals across our geography. Each hospital was asked to sign up to the improvement and for the year to date we have delivered on or below plan across our region. There is a requirement within the next 3 years for all hospitals to reach the 15 minute handover target and have not delay over 45 minutes. We will continue to work with all hospitals to deliver these targets and we will submit our plan to NSHE in February for 26/27.”

    Source location

    Response from South Central Ambulance Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The relevant hospital organisation, rather than the ambulance service, has ultimate power to resolve ambulance handover-delay concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is regretful that a Regulation 28 report was issued to this Trust when the source of the concern relates to a different organisation, and it is they who ultimately have the power to take action to resolve the concerns. Moving forward, we would be grateful if HM Coroner could write to the appropriate organisation in line with paragraph 9 of Chapter 16 of the Chief Coroner’s Bench Book.”

    Source location

    Response from South Central Ambulance Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 November 2025

    Open published response
  6. Northamptonshire

    AI-generated summary

    Lewis Aubrey GARFIELD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lewis Aubrey Garfield suffered an intracerebral haemorrhage at home on 4 December 2024, fell down the stairs, and was taken to John Radcliffe Hospital, where he died on 8 December 2024. Concerns included delays in clinical review and ambulance attendance, inadequate guidance to the family while awaiting an ambulance, and delays handing patients over from ambulances to hospitals, with wider delays affecting patient flow and ambulance availability.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in ambulance-to-hospital handover

    Wider context from the report

    “d) I understand that nationally, the target time for handover from ambulance to hospital staff is 15 minutes. In the present case, the handover from ambulance to nursing staff at John Radcliffe Hospital took 25 minutes. However, at the same time, the longest handover time at Northampton General Hospital was 5 hours and at Kettering General Hospital it was 7 hours. The Trust lost 115 hours waiting to handover at Northampton over 121 hours at Kettering. e) I heard evidence that steps are being taken to mitigate the impact of pressures in the healthcare system. University Hospitals of Northamptonshire have adopted the ‘45-minute handover’ approach. Despite this, on the day of the inquest on 27 October 2025, average handover times at Northampton General Hospital were 1 hour 11 minutes and I suspect that this will get worse during the full onset of winter pressures. ”

    Source location

    Lewis Aubrey GARFIELD · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in transferring ambulance patients into the Emergency Department

    Wider context from the report

    “f) The delays getting patients from the Emergency Department (ED) into wards, causes delays taking patients from ambulances into ED, and a knock-on delay getting ambulances back out into the community. These delays persist despite the current actions to mitigate. ”

    Source location

    Lewis Aubrey GARFIELD · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Formalise direct ambulance pathways to Same Day Emergency Care and extend operating hours.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Date | Action Implemented | Impact Mar 2025 | Implementation of a standardised Transfer of Care (TOC) form across UHN. | Improve quality and reduce delays associated with TOC referrals into the discharge hub. Mar 2025 | Frailty SDEC go live KGH. | Dedicated capacity for Frailty SDEC service. Mar 2025 | Agreement of Internal Professional Standards across UHN. | Expectations on timeliness of specialty support and escalation. Apr 2025 | Sir Thomas Moore Ward (KGH) reopened to adult patients for 24/7 discharge lounge. | 14 additional bed spaces and 8 chairs for patients planned discharge to reduce length of stay. Apr 2025 | Formalised direct to SDEC pathways for EMAS and extended operating hours. | 15% increase in SDEC activity to reduce ED attendance and overcrowding. Apr-May 2025 | Boardround test for change and Boardround SOP (NGH).”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals of Northamptonshire
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Launch Rapid Assessment and Acute Assessment Units to expand ambulance handover capacity and stream patients directly into acute assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Oct 2025 | Frailty SDEC go live NGH. | Frailty team based in medical SDEC for specialty assessment. Oct 2025 | Trusted Assessor introduced at NGH. | Reduce discharge delays for patients returning to care homes. Nov 2025 | Rapid Assessment Unit (RAU) and Acute Assessment Unit (AAU) go live. | Increase in capacity of ambulance handover space and medical pathway directly into AAU reducing ED demand. Dec 2025 | Introduction of nerve centre pre arrivals screen | Improvement in <15min handovers as EMAS Siren clinical history added as pre arrival ready for handover once ambulance arrives to site.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals of Northamptonshire
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce a NerveCentre pre-arrival screen using ambulance clinical histories to prepare handovers before arrival.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Oct 2025 | Frailty SDEC go live NGH. | Frailty team based in medical SDEC for specialty assessment. Oct 2025 | Trusted Assessor introduced at NGH. | Reduce discharge delays for patients returning to care homes. Nov 2025 | Rapid Assessment Unit (RAU) and Acute Assessment Unit (AAU) go live. | Increase in capacity of ambulance handover space and medical pathway directly into AAU reducing ED demand. Dec 2025 | Introduction of nerve centre pre arrivals screen | Improvement in <15min handovers as EMAS Siren clinical history added as pre arrival ready for handover once ambulance arrives to site.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals of Northamptonshire
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Commission eight additional Rapid Assessment Unit trolley spaces at Northampton General Hospital for primary assessment and faster handover.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As of Monday 3rd November at NGH, a new purpose built Rapid Assessment Unit (RAU) was commissioned providing 8 additional trolley spaces aimed at handover within 15mins into a dedicated space for primary assessment of patients. This forms a key part of strategic planning that will see a new Urgent Treatment Centre open from July 2026 with works already having commenced.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals of Northamptonshire
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue working with system partners to reduce delay impacts and implement the national 45-minute maximum ambulance handover standard.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Overcrowding in the Emergency Department is well recognised as impacting on quality and safety, increasing risk of harm to patients if unable to handover from ambulances. This risk is actively monitored through the Trust Accountability Framework with performance and actions reviewed through Divisional Accountability meetings, Clinical Quality and Safety Committee in Common, Trust Board and ICB UEC Board. In line with this year’s 2025/26 planning guidance and Urgent and Emergency Care Recovery plan a 45min handover ceiling has been worked towards in close collaboration with EMAS colleagues both at Directorate and Director level.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals of Northamptonshire
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reduce ambulance handovers to a maximum of 45 minutes and average Category 2 response times to 30 minutes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are taking serious steps to achieve this. We published our Urgent and Emergency Care Plan for 2025/26 which focuses on improvements to deliver better UEC performance both daily and during winter pressures, ensuring more patients receive timely and clinically appropriate care. Key actions include:”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 31 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the 45-minute ambulance handover protocol with acute, commissioning and national healthcare partners through weekly oversight meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Persistent delays across the system have led to the introduction of an additional operational measure known as the 45-minute handover ceiling. This is also in this year’s 2025/26 planning guidance and Urgent Emergency Care recovery plan. Under this policy, if a patient has not been formally handed over within 45 minutes, ambulance crews are required to complete a safe transfer process and leave the patient in the care of hospital staff. This includes ensuring the patient is placed in an appropriate location (such as a trolley, chair, or designated waiting area) and that essential clinical information is communicated to ED personnel. The purpose of this measure is to prevent excessive delays that compromise ambulance availability and community response times for life-threatening incidents.”

    Source location

    Response from East Midlands Ambulance Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Direct patients dynamically to hospitals outside their usual catchment areas when necessary to reduce handover delays and restore ambulance availability.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Within the Northamptonshire division, the Trust are now implementing dynamic strategic conveyance on a daily basis, directing patients to hospitals outside their usual catchment area when necessary. This approach helps mitigate the impact of excessive handover delays at pressured acute sites, reducing lost time and enabling crews to return promptly to attend patients in the community.”

    Source location

    Response from East Midlands Ambulance Service
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Initiate and record rapid or immediate hospital handover requests during high-demand periods under the safe-handover escalation procedure.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust proactively initiates ‘rapid handover’ requests during periods of high demand, particularly when multiple hospital handover delays coincide with uncovered Category 2 emergency calls. These actions are guided by our ‘Managing Delays in the Safe Handover of Patients’ Standard Operating Procedure, which incorporates a series of triggers aligned with the NHSE Midlands Region agreed process.”

    Source location

    Response from East Midlands Ambulance Service
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Enable ambulance services to convey patients directly to non-emergency-department facilities, including same-day emergency care services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are taking serious steps to achieve this. We published our Urgent and Emergency Care Plan for 2025/26 which focuses on improvements to deliver better UEC performance both daily and during winter pressures, ensuring more patients receive timely and clinically appropriate care. Key actions include:”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 31 October 2025

    Open published response
  7. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Ricky O'Connell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ricky O'Connell's overnight symptoms deteriorated and his partner called an ambulance, but it had not arrived by the time he collapsed. He was treated by his family and ambulance staff, transported to hospital, and died there on 27 January 2025. The principal concerns were significant ambulance delays, including delays caused by prolonged hospital handovers, high demand, and limited vehicle availability, with evidence that an ambulance should have arrived before he collapsed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in clearing ambulances from emergency departments within accepted turnaround times

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The inquest heard evidence that it was accepted that adherence to the timescales should have resulted in an ambulance arriving before he collapsed. The evidence given was that NWAS had done a huge amount of work to try to improve ambulance response times. This included improved staffing and call handling. However delays in ambulances clearing ED was still having a very significant impact on their ability to respond to calls including category 2 calls such as the one for Mr O’Connell. 2. The inquest was told that the ambulance service was generally operating at full stretch due to the demand for their services. The reasons for the demand were multi factorial and included challenges in accessing primary care. 3. The inquest was told that generally the period towards the end of a nightshift could be the busiest and resulted in waiting times increasing further. On the day in question across GM some hospitals were taking up to 60 minutes extra over the accepted turnaround time to clear ambulances. This led to significant challenges for NWAS. 4. The inquest was told that in Greater Manchester all of the Trusts have improved their turnaround times overall in the last few months but due to very significant delays in ambulance turnaround times at other Trusts in particular in Cheshire and Merseyside, NWAS were still being adversely impacted in terms of available vehicles to respond to calls across the North West. ”

    Source location

    Ricky O'Connell · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reduce ambulance handovers to a maximum of 45 minutes and average Category 2 response times to 30 minutes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We also published our Urgent and Emergency Care Plan for 2025/26 in June which focuses on improvements to deliver better UEC performance both daily and during winter pressures. Key actions include:”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Improve hospital patient flow so 78% of A&E patients are seen within four hours and reduce 12-hour waits.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We also published our Urgent and Emergency Care Plan for 2025/26 in June which focuses on improvements to deliver better UEC performance both daily and during winter pressures. Key actions include:”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue monitoring performance and working with NWAS and NHS England to sustain urgent and emergency care improvements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Efforts to reduce ambulance handover delays are also progressing. NWAS reports significant local collaboration between Integrated Care Boards (ICBs), Acute Trusts, and NHSE regional teams. These efforts aim to ensure safe and timely patient handovers, freeing up crews to respond to emergencies in the community.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 August 2025

    Open published response
  8. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Valerie HILL · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Valerie HILL died on 11 March 2022 at Royal Glamorgan Hospital after a fall at Ty Bargoed Care Home led to a periprosthetic femur fracture; pneumonia, COPD and frailty of old age were also recorded. She waited on the floor for over 14 hours for an ambulance, and concerns were raised about inadequate care-home risk assessments, prolonged ambulance handover times, patient-flow systems and continuing system-wide delays in access to emergency care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Excessive ambulance-to-emergency-department handover delays

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) On 17.2.22 you wrote (then as Minister for Health & Social Care) to the Chairs of all Health Boards in Wales, and inter alia, alerted the same to the following: - “The volumes of people waiting excessive periods for transfer from ambulance vehicles to the care of staff in Emergency Departments, in particular, has reached intolerable levels….I am concerned about the level of tolerance to such delays a require you to take greater ownership of this issue as a priority….the current situation cannot continue” The then, and continuing NHS Deputy Chief Executive ████████ gave evidence at the Inquest. He indicated that CTMUHB had been in Targeted Intervention since October 2022 (2.5 years) and he hadn’t seen significant improvement in relation to 15 minute or 1hr handovers. In answer to my final question to him as to whether a situation akin to that which Valerie faced on 7 March 2022 could happen again today, he accepted that that was a fair conclusion and that the same risks remain in the system In the three years since Valerie’s death you have received multiple Prevention of Future Death Reports from myself and fellow Coroner’s in Wales highlighting the devastating outcomes attributable to delays in conveying acutely unwell patients to hospital/ambulance handover delays. Those risks continue and are of acute concern to myself and my Coronial colleagues throughout Wales. ”

    Source location

    Valerie HILL · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to align ambulance rostering assumptions with hospital handover performance

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Despite some relaxation in the guidelines set by the Welsh Ministers in relation to ambulance handover delays/timings in 2024, WAST continues to adopt the 15 minute handover expectation/assumption for their rostering. Yet I received evidence that hospitals across Wales are only delivering this expectation around 10-20% of the time. My concern is that this disconnect is having a significant effect upon how the system for conveying acutely ill patients in the community to hospital is operating and changes are indicated to address this system dysfunctionality. ”

    Source location

    Valerie HILL · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of health board plans to improve ambulance handover timeliness

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) In your response to my Prevention of Future Death Report in relation to Lynda Blackmore (PFD and your response annexed) you indicated inter alia:- “For the past two iterations of the framework, I have been explicitly clear of my expectation that Health Boards prioritise plans to improve timeliness of ambulance patient handover to free up ambulance clinicians to respond to patients in the community…I have also set a priority for improvement of patient flow.” My concern is that the same has not led to any discernible improvement in ambulance handover delays & that consideration might be given for a review of the level of escalation that not only applies on this issue to CTMUHB but also those Health Boards across Wales. I was repeatedly referenced at the Inquest by CTMUHB that their performance in many areas relating to ambulance handover times was not “the worst in Wales”. ”

    Source location

    Valerie HILL · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient escalation of ambulance handover delays across health boards

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) In your response to my Prevention of Future Death Report in relation to Lynda Blackmore (PFD and your response annexed) you indicated inter alia:- “For the past two iterations of the framework, I have been explicitly clear of my expectation that Health Boards prioritise plans to improve timeliness of ambulance patient handover to free up ambulance clinicians to respond to patients in the community…I have also set a priority for improvement of patient flow.” My concern is that the same has not led to any discernible improvement in ambulance handover delays & that consideration might be given for a review of the level of escalation that not only applies on this issue to CTMUHB but also those Health Boards across Wales. I was repeatedly referenced at the Inquest by CTMUHB that their performance in many areas relating to ambulance handover times was not “the worst in Wales”. ”

    Source location

    Valerie HILL · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Commission and complete a review of health-board compliance with ambulance patient handover guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Cabinet Secretary for Health and Social Care has been clear with health boards about his expectation for improvement in the timeliness of ambulance patient handovers. All health boards are expected to deliver the Ambulance Patient Handover Guidance, which has been established as one of the five priorities (‘enabling actions’) for urgent and emergency care in the NHS planning framework for 2025-26. It also features as part of the health board chairs’ objectives as a marker of performance.”

    Source location

    Response from The First Minister for Wales
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Seek urgent assurance from each health board on actions supporting handover-guidance compliance and reduced delays.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A review of health board compliance was commissioned in quarter four of 2024-25 and completed in March 2025 by NHS Performance and Improvement. A report containing learning and key themes for health boards to consider was shared by Welsh Government on 18 June 2025. A copy is attached at annex A.”

    Source location

    Response from The First Minister for Wales
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Follow up health-board progress through Integrated Quality Planning and Delivery meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Welsh Government officials have sought urgent assurance from each health board about how they will deliver specific actions against the eight aspects from the report to support compliance with the handover guidance and work towards delivery of no delays in excess of 45 minutes by quarter three of 2025-26. Progress will be followed up by officials and NHS Performance and Improvement at Integrated Quality Planning and Delivery meetings with health boards.”

    Source location

    Response from The First Minister for Wales
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish a National Handover-45 Taskforce to support system-wide ambulance handover improvements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The independent Getting it Right First Time (GIRFT) and Ministerial Advisory Group on NHS Performance and Productivity report also underscored the need for change. The Cabinet Secretary for Health and Social Care has announced a National Handover-45 Taskforce to support health boards and WAST to deliver system-wide improvements to improve ambulance handover.”

    Source location

    Response from The First Minister for Wales
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and support high-impact community pathways, effective emergency-department processes, and patient-flow and discharge processes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The taskforce will develop and support delivery of high-impact clinical pathways in the community; support the delivery of effective evidence-based emergency department processes and support the delivery of evidence-based processes to improve the flow of patients from emergency departments to wards and optimise discharge.”

    Source location

    Response from The First Minister for Wales
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Assess NHS Wales readiness to deliver ambulance handovers within 15 minutes and no later than 45 minutes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It will play a key role in assessing and supporting the readiness of NHS Wales to deliver every ambulance patient handover within 15 minutes as far as possible, but always within 45 minutes.”

    Source location

    Response from The First Minister for Wales
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Compile evidence on effective ambulance handover strategies to inform an improvement programme and readiness assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The taskforce will use the NHS Performance and Improvement review as a foundation and compile comprehensive evidence about effective strategies for improving ambulance patient handover. This will inform the development of an improvement programme and a readiness assessment.”

    Source location

    Response from The First Minister for Wales
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Run 30-, 60- and 90-day rapid improvement events with health-board and operational leaders.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The taskforce will support health boards and WAST through a series of rapid improvement events over a 30, 60 and 90-day period. These will bring together senior clinical and operational leaders at a health board level with a focus on high-impact pathways, emergency department processes, improving patient flow and encouraging clinical ownership of actions.”

    Source location

    Response from The First Minister for Wales
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share successful local strategies, cultures, processes and models with all health boards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There have been some encouraging signs of improvement because of local strategies, the work of the Six Goals for Urgent and Emergency Care programme, and the Wales-wide focus on reduced delayed hospital discharges. These approaches will be shared with all health boards and the taskforce will also draw on other successful cultures, processes and models from across the UK.”

    Source location

    Response from The First Minister for Wales
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Welsh Ministers set strategic expectations but do not deliver health services; health boards and NHS trusts deliver services within the national policy framework.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Welsh Ministers set the strategic expectations for health and care services and hold health bodies accountable for fulfilling their statutory duties. Welsh Ministers are not responsible for the delivery of health services.”

    Source location

    Response from The First Minister for Wales
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Health boards are responsible for ensuring ambulance handovers occur reliably, in clinical priority order and within 15 minutes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Welsh Government’s clear expectation is that when someone is conveyed to hospital by ambulance, care must be handed over to the receiving hospital team as soon as possible, in order of clinical priority and within 15 minutes. Health boards are responsible for ensuring this happens reliably and that there is sufficient available capacity throughout the receiving hospital. This is set out in the Ambulance Patient Handover Guidance.”

    Source location

    Response from The First Minister for Wales
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    WAST is responsible for managing and delivering emergency ambulance services, while the JCC plans, secures and commissions them.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Welsh Ambulance Services National Health Service Trust (Establishment) Order 1998 established the Welsh Ambulance Services University National Health Service Trust (WAST). ████████”

    Source location

    Response from The First Minister for Wales
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 June 2025

    Open published response
  9. Devon, Plymouth and Torbay

    AI-generated summary

    Brian GARRICK · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Brian Garrick experienced severe chest pain on 10 August 2022 and was taken to hospital after a substantial ambulance response delay. He suffered a cardiac arrest during a procedure and was pronounced deceased at 1145. The principal concern was that severe delays in patient handovers at acute hospitals were affecting ambulance response times and timely treatment for acute illnesses.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Severe delays in patient handovers at acute hospitals preventing ambulances and crews returning to service

    Wider context from the report

    “I heard evidence from the ambulance trust that on the night in question, despite the volume of calls to the service being at normal levels and crew and vehicle levels being also at normal levels, there were significant delays to ambulance response times due to long hand over times at the local acute hospitals which were preventing ambulances and their crews returning to service. I heard evidence from the ambulance service that significant action has been taken at a local level by the ambulance and the hospital trusts to try to alleviate the problem and that some progress had been made, but that hand over times were still impacting on service delivery and that as such members of the public are at risk of not receiving timely medical treatment for acute illnesses. I was informed that further progress to be achieved strategic solutions at Governmental level were required to provide an effective solution. 1. Response times for ambulances attending acute medical incidents continue to be impacted by severe delays in patient handovers at acute hospitals preventing ambulances and their crews returning to service. ”

    Source location

    Brian GARRICK · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide capital investment for Same Day Emergency Care, Mental Health Crisis Assessment Centres and new ambulances.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “On the 6 June 2025, we published our Urgent and Emergency Care Plan for 2025/26. The Plan focuses on improvements that will see the biggest impact on UEC performance next winter and on making UEC better every day, backed by a total of nearly £450 million of funding. The Plan will:”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reduce ambulance handovers to a maximum of 45 minutes and Category 2 response times to 30 minutes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “On the 6 June 2025, we published our Urgent and Emergency Care Plan for 2025/26. The Plan focuses on improvements that will see the biggest impact on UEC performance next winter and on making UEC better every day, backed by a total of nearly £450 million of funding. The Plan will:”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Improve hospital patient flow so at least 78% of A&E patients are seen within four hours and fewer wait over 12 hours.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “On the 6 June 2025, we published our Urgent and Emergency Care Plan for 2025/26. The Plan focuses on improvements that will see the biggest impact on UEC performance next winter and on making UEC better every day, backed by a total of nearly £450 million of funding. The Plan will:”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 June 2025

    Open published response
  10. North Wales (East and Central)

    AI-generated summary

    Jeanette Sidlow Beech · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jeanette Sidlow Beech, who had a history of alcohol withdrawal-related seizures, became unwell at home on 2 August 2024 and died there on 3 August 2024 after suffering a seizure and cardiac arrest. An ambulance took 15 hours and 13 minutes to attend, by which time resuscitation efforts were unsuccessful. The report raises concerns about ambulance response and hospital handover delays, linked to wider pressures involving hospital capacity, social care and community hospital provision.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in hospital handover of ambulances

    Wider context from the report

    “a. It took a total period of 15 hours and 13 minutes for an ambulance to attend upon Jeanette, by which time she was in cardiac arrest and resuscitation efforts were unsuccessful. b. Whilst evidence was received and heard during the Inquest that efforts have been and are still being taken by WAST to improve the situation regarding ambulance delays, there remains significant concerns with Hospital handover delays. c. It is well known, having heard evidence in previous Inquests, that the causes of ambulance delays are multifactorial. They do not rest solely with WAST. d. Many Coroners in Wales have issued many Reports over many years on the time it takes for ambulances to attend on the background of various reasons. e. It appears to remain the case that the lack of social care provision and/or Community Hospitals means that those fit to be discharged from district general hospitals are not discharged and those in Emergency Departments or on ambulances outside Emergency Departments are unable to be provided with a bed in the hospitals such that ambulances remain outside Emergency Departments for hours. Evidence was heard that between 2nd and 3rd August 2024 at Betsi Cadwaladr University Local Health Board the longest delay in ambulance handover times were in excess of 6 hours and 7 hours. f. The issues identified are pertinent to WAST, the Health Board and Local Authorities. g. There appears to be no improvement in these ongoing issues and I am particularly concerned that lives are being put at risk, and that deaths will occur into the future and will continue to occur where this situation persists. ”

    Source location

    Jeanette Sidlow Beech · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete the compliance review of ambulance patient handover guidance and share its findings with health boards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To support health boards, my officials arranged a review of compliance with the ambulance patient handover guidance during the last quarter of 2024-25, which was completed by March 2025 by NHS Performance and Improvement. A report detailing the findings and key themes for health boards was shared on 18 June. A copy is attached at annex A.”

    Source location

    Response from Welsh Government
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Seek urgent assurance from each health board on actions to comply with ambulance handover guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “My officials have sought urgent assurance from each health board about how they will deliver specific actions against the eight aspects in this report to support compliance with the handover guidance and work towards delivery of no delays of more than 45 minutes by quarter three in 2025-26. Progress will be closely monitored by the Welsh Government and NHS Performance and Improvement at Integrated Quality Planning and Delivery meetings.”

    Source location

    Response from Welsh Government
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor health-board progress against ambulance handover actions through Integrated Quality Planning and Delivery meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “My officials have sought urgent assurance from each health board about how they will deliver specific actions against the eight aspects in this report to support compliance with the handover guidance and work towards delivery of no delays of more than 45 minutes by quarter three in 2025-26. Progress will be closely monitored by the Welsh Government and NHS Performance and Improvement at Integrated Quality Planning and Delivery meetings.”

    Source location

    Response from Welsh Government
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish the clinically led National Handover-45 Taskforce.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To further drive improvements, I announced on 30 June, a clinically-led National Handover-45 Taskforce – the details are set out in this Written Statement.”

    Source location

    Response from Welsh Government
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Compile evidence on effective ambulance handover strategies and develop an improvement programme and readiness assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The taskforce will use the NHS Performance and Improvement review as a foundation and will compile comprehensive evidence on effective strategies for improving ambulance patient handover. This will inform the development of an improvement programme and a readiness assessment.”

    Source location

    Response from Welsh Government
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Support health boards and WAST to improve ambulance handover performance toward 15-minute handovers and a 45-minute backstop.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It will support all health boards and WAST to improve handover performance, working towards delivery of a standard ambulance patient handover within 15 minutes, with a backstop of 45 minutes.”

    Source location

    Response from Welsh Government
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Welsh Ministers set strategic expectations but are not responsible for delivering health services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Welsh Ministers set the strategic context and expectations for health and care services in Wales and hold NHS organisations accountable for fulfilling their statutory duties. Welsh Ministers are not responsible for the delivery of health services.”

    Source location

    Response from Welsh Government
    Page 1 · response
    Published 17 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Health boards are responsible for planning, commissioning and delivering local health services within the national policy framework.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Health boards and NHS trusts are responsible for planning, commissioning and delivering services for the population of their local areas, in line with the national policy framework set by Welsh Ministers.”

    Source location

    Response from Welsh Government
    Page 1 · response
    Published 17 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Health boards are responsible for ensuring ambulance handovers occur reliably and that receiving hospitals have sufficient capacity.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Welsh Government’s policy expectation of health boards is that when a patient is conveyed to a hospital by ambulance, care must be handed over to the receiving hospital team as soon as possible, in order of clinical priority and within 15 minutes. Health boards are responsible for ensuring this happens reliably and that there is sufficient available capacity throughout the receiving hospital. This is set out in the Ambulance Patient Handover Guidance.”

    Source location

    Response from Welsh Government
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 June 2025

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026