Recurring concern

Failure of emergency and search-and-rescue services to use mutually understood terminology

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 23 Sep 2013•Latest report 8 Jun 2023

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes only assertions that directly instantiate the manually reviewed condition ‘Failure of emergency and search-and-rescue services to use mutually understood terminology’ and satisfy this evidence boundary: Two distinct reports directly support terminology and processes not being mutually understood between emergency or search-and-rescue services. Internal ambulance terminology for acute behavioural disturbance and police wording for urgency are single-service controls and must be excluded from the cross-service parent.

Not included

  • Excludes generic inter-agency communication or coordination failures where no shared terminology or operational-process understanding is deficient.
  • Excludes clinical treatment, ambulance attendance, police response or rescue failures occurring after emergency services have clearly understood and applied the relevant terminology and processes.
  • Excludes terminology problems confined to a single organisation or unrelated to emergency or search-and-rescue response.
  • Excludes the existing narrower concern concerning shared terminology specifically within mental-health emergency responses when an assertion is confined to that boundary.
  • Excludes manifestations outside the manually reviewed boundary: Two distinct reports directly support terminology and processes not being mutually understood between emergency or search-and-rescue services. Internal ambulance terminology for acute behavioural disturbance and police wording for urgency are single-service controls and must be excluded from the cross-service parent.
Reports
4

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
4

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2023

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
39

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Association of Ambulance Chief Executives3
College of Policing3
Dorset Police2
National Police Chiefs’ Council2
Department of Health and Social Care1
Dorset & Wiltshire Fire and Rescue Service1
Home Office1
London Ambulance Service NHS Trust1
Maritime and Coastguard Agency1
Metropolitan Police Service1
National Ambulance Service Medical Directors1
National Fire Chiefs Council1
National Police Air Service1
NHS England1
Niche Technology UK Limited1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Dorset

    AI-generated summary

    Ivan Rumenov Ignatov · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ivan Rumenov Ignatov entered the English Channel on 19 July 2020 and did not resurface; he was found deceased in the water on 31 July 2020. The report raises concerns about police risk assessment and recording, support for detainees released without accommodation or with language and literacy barriers, and communication between emergency and search-and-rescue services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of shared knowledge and understanding of terminology, processes and communication among emergency and search and rescue services

    Wider context from the report

    “iv. There is a lack of knowledge and/or understanding amongst emergency services and search and rescue services, especially around terminology, process and communication for them to be able to work together when an incident arises without confusion or misunderstanding arising. I would request that consideration is given to further national and local training or guidance across emergency and search and rescue services to ensure communication can be facilitated without delay, and ensure terms and processes are understood to avoid any doubt of what action is being taken when an incident is ongoing. ”

    Source location

    Ivan Rumenov Ignatov · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train all incident commanders in the JESIP joint doctrine interoperability framework and its principles of joint working.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Although the Service was not directly involved in the search and rescue operation on this occasion, we work closely with our colleagues in the wider emergency services and search and rescue services, including police, ambulance, and His Majesty’s Coastguard. It is for the reasons you identify that we remain committed to the Joint Emergency Services Interoperability Principles (JESIP). The JESIP joint doctrine interoperability framework forms the foundation on which we train all our incident commanders and contains the five principles of joint working:”

    Source location

    Response from Dorset and Wiltshire Fire and Rescue
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Represent the Service at the Dorset Blue Light Group meeting to address interoperability challenges involving partners’ different radio communications.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Service is an active member of the Dorset Local Resilience Forum, who consider JESIP as a key area for continuous improvement. Through this forum, the challenges of intra-operability with partners, who have different radio communications, is an area of focus for the Blue Light Group on 18 September 2023. Our Service will be appropriately represented at this meeting.”

    Source location

    Response from Dorset and Wiltshire Fire and Rescue
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold joint familiarisation briefings for all NPAS and HMCG staff, including communications teams.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A series of joint familiarisation briefings to be held between HMCG and NPAS - this will encompass all staff to ensure corporacy across both organisations and to reflect the fact that as a National Service, there may be occasions when landlocked bases do have to respond to incidents involving HMCG/ Water rescue. It will also include the Comms departments of both agencies.”

    Source location

    Response from National Police Air Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Consider extending familiarisation briefings to relevant force communications teams and approach the RNLI about equivalent engagement.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• This familiarisation briefing will be considered for roll-out to Comms element of Forces where water-based rescue is frequent i.e.; South Coast, North Yorkshire, Northumberland, Lancashire to ensure they have awareness of each agency and capabilities of each. An approach for the same to be made to the RNLI.”

    Source location

    Response from National Police Air Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and distribute a joint quick-action card prioritising establishment of an Emergency Services Airwave channel, with national partners asked to support dissemination.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Work to be commenced to develop a joint "quick action card" which will be distributed to all Forces and which prioritises the need for the Host Force ( in this case Dorset Police) to set an Emergency Services channel on Airwave which would allow early communication. We will be asking for Chief Coastguard and NPCC assistance to push this course of action.”

    Source location

    Response from National Police Air Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold monthly communications meetings between NPAS and HMCG operations-centre leads to debrief notable incidents and assess lessons learned.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Monthly Comms meetings to be held between Head of Ops Centre/ Equivalent HMCG staff member to de-brief incidents of note and assess lessons learnt.”

    Source location

    Response from National Police Air Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Participate in inter-agency debriefs, workshops, capability reviews, training and operational-learning meetings with emergency-service and search-and-rescue partners.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Ongoing Inter-Agency Liaison During the inquest, we provided HM Coroner with a statement from ████████, HM Coastguard's Lead for Civil Resilience. This statement provided an overview of the joint exercising and training events that take place at a local level, via the Local Resilience Forum (LRF), Dorset Local Search and Rescue Committee (LSARC) and the Dorset Blue Light Group.”

    Source location

    Response from Maritime and Coastguard Agency
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Facilitate continuing Dorset Police incident-commander CPD sessions covering Coastguard capabilities, early JRCC contact and coastal staff roles.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A number of these meetings have provided an opportunity to directly address your concerns and improve understanding between partner organisations. For example, Area Commander ████████ attended the Dorset Police Force Incident Commander CPD on 12 July to update the force on the capabilities of HM Coastguard and its declared facilities, the importance of calling HM Coastguard's coordination centre the Joint Rescue Coordination Centre (JRCC) early, and the on-the-ground roles undertaken by full-time coastal staff at incidents. This is part of an initiative set up between HM Coastguard and Dorset Police to promote effective working between the two agencies and will be the first of many CPD sessions HM Coastguard will facilitate with the Dorset Force Incident Managers, with the next one scheduled for 26 September 2023.”

    Source location

    Response from Maritime and Coastguard Agency
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide Joint Rescue Coordination Centre staff with structured visits to police, fire and ambulance control rooms to build understanding of roles, capabilities, processes and communications.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “HM Coastguard External Visits In order to address the Senior Coroner's concerns around control room level communication and understanding, all staff based at the Joint Rescue Coordination Centre in Fareham will partake in a series of Emergency Services Control Room visits (Police, Fire and Ambulance) commencing in September 2023.”

    Source location

    Response from Maritime and Coastguard Agency
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Host emergency-service visits to the Joint Rescue Coordination Centre using bespoke presentations and operational-learning content to explain Coastguard roles, capabilities, processes and communications.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Emergency Services and Search and Rescue Partner visits to the JRCC Additionally, other Emergency Services have been invited to visit the JRCC to enhance their understanding of HM Coastguard's operations.”

    Source location

    Response from Maritime and Coastguard Agency
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Collect visit feedback, review objectives and presentation content monthly, adjust materials and communicate identified learning to Joint Rescue Coordination Centre teams.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Feedback from partners on visits to the JRCC will be collated following each visit and following external visits via HM Coastguard Team Leaders. Content will then be reviewed by the JRCC Rescue Coordination Centre Manager through monthly meetings to ensure that objectives and presentation content is reviewed and adjusted accordingly. Any identified learning will be communicated within the teams at the JRCC.”

    Source location

    Response from Maritime and Coastguard Agency
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the Coastguard Capability Matrix with communications information and publish it on ResilienceDirect for emergency-service partners.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following the inquest, this was updated to provide further information around our communications capabilities. We enclosed a copy of the updated Capability Matrix with this response. This has also been uploaded to the MCA's ResilienceDirect page, where it can be downloaded and viewed by our emergency services partners. ResilienceDirect is a web-based platform used by emergency services that allows for real time information sharing between services.”

    Source location

    Response from Maritime and Coastguard Agency
    Page 5 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Include maritime rescue ‘connect call’ capability in routine exercises with stakeholders and Emergency Services Control Room visits.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “HM Coastguard has the technical capability to put a maritime rescue asset (such as an RNLI lifeboat) into a ‘connect call’ with shore-side responders (such as the police) using mobile phones via its Maritime Rescue Coordination Centres ("MRCC"). This capability facilitates the connection of a mobile phone to a marine VHF radio, with the HM Coastguard control room able to participate in the call to ensure that information is shared accurately between partners and that appropriate actions are taken by the coordinating team within the MRCC.”

    Source location

    Response from Maritime and Coastguard Agency
    Page 5 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold joint Dorset Police–Coastguard meetings every six months to review working practices and terminology.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A Senior Manager from HMCG also attended the Force Incident Manager and Deployment Manager Continuing Professional Development days in July 2023. These Events are held several times a year to generate discussions about policies, processes, and deployments. These particular sessions served to improve understanding in terms of the respective obligations of Dorset Police and HMCG. This meeting was so positive and productive, that Dorset Police and HMCG have agreed to similar meetings every six months, for the specific purpose of reviewing our working practices and ensuring compliance. We also believe that these meetings will serve to improve the understanding of agency-specific terminology.”

    Source location

    Response from Dorset Police
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Engage with Dorset and Wiltshire Fire and Rescue Service to support effective multi-agency communication during incident response.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The NFCC have engaged with Dorset and Wiltshire FRS. The JESIP principles are well embedded within their service. They lead on multi agency training and working closely with the Local Resilience Forum to embed effective multiagency communication during the response phase.”

    Source location

    Response from National Fire Chiefs Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue encouraging fire and rescue services to follow existing JESIP doctrine and operational guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to the recommendations made the NFCC believes that appropriate guidance is available, and we will continue to encourage all FRSs to follow existing JESIP doctrine and operational guidance while continuing to develop existing guidance to make its application more effective.”

    Source location

    Response from National Fire Chiefs Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue developing existing operational guidance to make its application more effective.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to the recommendations made the NFCC believes that appropriate guidance is available, and we will continue to encourage all FRSs to follow existing JESIP doctrine and operational guidance while continuing to develop existing guidance to make its application more effective.”

    Source location

    Response from National Fire Chiefs Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the ResilienceDirect page with RNLI capability information for emergency services and search-and-rescue partners.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “7. It is clear from the inquest that more work needs to be undertaken so that other emergency services/search and rescue partners understand the RNLI’s capabilities and how it operates.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal National Lifeboat Institution
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Prepare materials for direct sharing with emergency-services partners covering RNLI capabilities and limitations, including search equipment and communication capabilities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “8. Further it is also clear that more work needs to be undertaken to ensure emergency services/search and rescue partners understand the terminology that is used in relation to the RNLI to avoid any confusion or misunderstanding with those emergency services/search and rescue partners. By way of example around the difference between tasking and launching.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal National Lifeboat Institution
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement JESIP joint-working principles through commander, staff and control-room training, policies and procedures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The JESIP Joint Doctrine (edition 3 published in October 2021) sets out principles for joint working between the different services, which SWASFT ensures are implemented through training and its own policies and standard operating procedures. Those principles include communicating using language which is clear, and free from technical jargon and abbreviations.”

    Source location

    Response from South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Extend JESIP course invitations to HM Coastguard colleagues.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Invitations to attend JESIP courses are extended to colleagues from HM Coastguard. In addition, SWASFT is currently strengthening relationships by participating in a programme of visits by SWASFT and HM Coastguard commanders and other key role holders to other control rooms. This aims to further promoting shared understanding between SWASFT and HM Coastguard commanders of how each emergency service co-ordinates its response to incidents, and the terminology used by each service. During such a visit the visiting commander shadows the resident control commander, observing processes in operation and listening to communications with officers on-scene.”

    Source location

    Response from South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen SWASFT–HM Coastguard coordination through commander visits and control-room shadowing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Invitations to attend JESIP courses are extended to colleagues from HM Coastguard. In addition, SWASFT is currently strengthening relationships by participating in a programme of visits by SWASFT and HM Coastguard commanders and other key role holders to other control rooms. This aims to further promoting shared understanding between SWASFT and HM Coastguard commanders of how each emergency service co-ordinates its response to incidents, and the terminology used by each service. During such a visit the visiting commander shadows the resident control commander, observing processes in operation and listening to communications with officers on-scene.”

    Source location

    Response from South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce effective aide-mémoires for control-room dispatchers and commanders supporting joint working with HM Coastguard.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are also ensuring effective aide memoirs are in place for our dispatchers and commanders within our control room to support effective joint working with the HM Coastguard. This work has begun over the last few months and will be finalised during the forthcoming couple of months. The aim is to ensure that business-as-usual working between SWASFT and HM Coastguard is well embedded with key relationships formed, making sure that when the larger incidents happen we already have a strong working relationship.”

    Source location

    Response from South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain a standard operating procedure for notifying other emergency services and relevant utility providers about incidents.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A standard operating procedure is in place to guide the Emergency Medical Dispatchers in our Emergency Operations Centres (the EOCs – our control rooms in Bristol and Exeter) regarding receiving emergency calls from other emergency services, and when to notify the police, fire service, coastguard or utility providers of an incident to which an ambulance has been called. Outgoing calls to other services are made to dedicated blue light service lines into their control rooms in most cases.”

    Source location

    Response from South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement and routinely exercise a three-way control-room call process enabling direct communication between ambulance, police and fire services during major incidents.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In 2019 multiagencies implemented a 3 way call process which can be instigated in the event of a Major Incident, to enable SWASFT and the police and fire services to directly communicate through control rooms. This process enables control rooms to effectively communicate on an open call (or via MSTEAMS in some areas) prior to the arrival of resources at the scene of an incident and facilitates effective command and control in the initial stages of an incident. The setting up of these calls are routinely exercised within the SWASFT EOCs.”

    Source location

    Response from South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide inter-control hailing and multiagency talkgroups enabling direct ambulance, police and fire control-room communication during major or significant incidents.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the event of a Major or Significant Incident (Standby or Declared), each of SWASFT’s two EOCs can also notify, or be notified by, the police or fire services via an Inter Control Hailing Talkgroup. Following the initial notification, communications will be transferred to a specific multiagency talk group which will allow the three services to directly communicate regarding that incident through control rooms (while leaving the inter-control talkgroup free for any other notifications). This has been in place since late 2020.”

    Source location

    Response from South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain a trained NILO cohort with two officers available around the clock to support incident commanders and partner agencies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has a cohort of NILOs, who are trained to advise and support Incident Commanders, Police, Fire, military and other Government agencies on SWASFT’s operational capacity and capability to reduce risk and safely resolve incidents at which a SWASFT attendance may be required, including major incidents, complex or protracted multi-agency incidents. The Trust has two individuals on call 24/7 who can advise and deploy to support the response to incidents to ensure effective multiagency communication.”

    Source location

    Response from South Western Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing JESIP-based training, assessment and resilience-forum arrangements address communication and interoperability concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Although the Service was not directly involved in the search and rescue operation on this occasion, we work closely with our colleagues in the wider emergency services and search and rescue services, including police, ambulance, and His Majesty’s Coastguard. It is for the reasons you identify that we remain committed to the Joint Emergency Services Interoperability Principles (JESIP). The JESIP joint doctrine interoperability framework forms the foundation on which we train all our incident commanders and contains the five principles of joint working:”

    Source location

    Response from Dorset and Wiltshire Fire and Rescue
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Home Force, rather than NPAS, should open the Emergency Services channel to enable communication between the relevant emergency services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The second actions related to Section 5 subsection 2 part vi of the report and concentrated on the communication between the relevant emergency services. In brief, the home force, NPAS and HMCG all have access to Airwave and an Emergency Services channel should have been opened by the Home Force. This would have allowed the 3 services to communicate easily and is covered by the JESIP principles for matters of this type. RNLI do not have Airwave but have access to VHF which the HMCG also has so they are able to communicate in this way.”

    Source location

    Response from National Police Air Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    RNLI and HMCG can communicate using VHF, so RNLI’s lack of Airwave access does not prevent communication by existing arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The second actions related to Section 5 subsection 2 part vi of the report and concentrated on the communication between the relevant emergency services. In brief, the home force, NPAS and HMCG all have access to Airwave and an Emergency Services channel should have been opened by the Home Force. This would have allowed the 3 services to communicate easily and is covered by the JESIP principles for matters of this type. RNLI do not have Airwave but have access to VHF which the HMCG also has so they are able to communicate in this way.”

    Source location

    Response from National Police Air Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing JESIP doctrine and NFCC operational guidance provide an appropriate response to interagency communication concerns, so no additional guidance is required.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to the recommendations made the NFCC believes that appropriate guidance is available, and we will continue to encourage all FRSs to follow existing JESIP doctrine and operational guidance while continuing to develop existing guidance to make its application more effective.”

    Source location

    Response from National Fire Chiefs Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lifeboat communications should remain routed through Coastguard tasking; direct contact by other agencies is inappropriate because conflicting messages could distract crews.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. As the Coastguard is the tasking authority and responsible for coordinating searches, the method of communication with the Lifeboat is via the Coastguard following IMSAR protocols as a maritime search and rescue capability. Having other multiple organisations able to communicate with the Lifeboat is not effective. It can lead to conflicting information being given and undermine effective tasking as well as creating a distraction for the crews receiving multiple messages. This, in turn, could hamper the effectiveness of the lifesaving service and lives could be lost if the crew are distracted or given conflicting information.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal National Lifeboat Institution
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Search and rescue services are tasked through the Police and do not fall under NHS England’s remit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Search and rescue services such as Coastguard and Mountain Rescue are tasked through the Police and do not fall under NHS remit. Any multi-agency working such as that which took place during the search for Ivan should be governed by the Joint Emergency Services Interoperability Principles: Home - JESIP Website.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response
  2. Berkshire

    AI-generated summary

    Neal Terence Saunders · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Neal Terence Saunders was restrained by police for 58 minutes, including 14 minutes in a prone position, after police attended his address following an assault report and concerns about recent cocaine use and paranoid behaviour. He suffered a cardiac arrest while being transported to hospital and died there on 4 September 2020. Concerns included inadequate guidance and training about prolonged restraint, ambulance response expectations, prone transportation, and coordination and training between police and ambulance services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inconsistent terminology for the ABD umbrella term across services

    Wider context from the report

    “Brief summary of matters of concern Police training There was extensive BWV footage in this case, which both I and the jury were able to see multiple times. It appeared to me, and (presumably) to the jury, (given their conclusion), that the officers at the scene were trying to take Neal’s welfare into account. The real issue was around their training. Whilst there may not have been any realistic or practicable alternative to restraining Neal, at least initially, it was clear from the evidence that none of the officers recalled their training which had told them that “prolonged” restraint should be avoided. The training gives no guidance as to what constitutes “prolonged” restraint, and this an issue which the jury highlighted. There are also a number of concerns regarding College of Policing training in this respect. The key concerns around training can be summarised as follows:- 1.   How long is “prolonged” restraint? 2.   One of the witnesses questioned whether the guidelines applied at all if somebody is under arrest, particularly regarding “contain rather than restraint”. Given that these are police guidelines, it seems to me likely that they would apply, whether a person is arrested for public order offences or other matters (but that should be clarified). 3.   The College of Policing slides regarding ABD state that a “Cat 1 call” should be made to the ambulance service. The slides go on to say that the ambulance service should respond to ABD as a “category 1” [response]. It is clear that categorisation would be a matter for the ambulance service rather than the police, and this training may result in inappropriate expectations on behalf of officers at scene, who are expecting an ambulance to arrive more quickly that it in fact does. This in turn could affect their decision making. 4.   The guidelines also refer to providing “chemical sedation”. This appears to me to indicate an incorrect understanding of what is likely to be done medically by a first responding paramedic or emergency care assistant. 5.   It was interesting to note that the parts of the training the officers did seem to remember were around when the training was provided in a very physical way (around positions for restraint etc.) and the final slide “ABD = A&B”. It appears that the more “classroom based” training is less well received. I understand that the College of Policing is changing its methods, and it may be that an educational consultant with policing background could assist with this in trying to achieve training which will stick with those being trained more effectively. 6.   Is there a better way for the College of Policing to ensure that the training has worked and is embedded? Training generally I raise 2 points here: 1.   Checking of guidance which is infrequently used 2.   Joint training with ambulance services Thames Valley Police and the College of Policing will be aware of my Regulation 28 report dated 9th July 2019, following the death of Leroy Medford in 2017. I raised a number of concerns about police training, and received responses from Thames Valley Police and the College of Policing. These are publicly accessible documents on the Chief Coroner’s website. I am concerned that the issues raised around training in that report have been insufficiently addressed. The only substantive change appears to relate to better remote access to guidance. In both inquests, the guidance was in relation to a matter which is not commonly faced by police officers. Whilst I consider ABD training could and should be improved, I accept that there has to be proportionality, given that officers will require training in a number of areas, some of which are far more frequently relevant than this. In addition to achieving better training, I consider that Thames Valley Police (and police nationally), should consider a change of approach. I consider that police officers should be mandated to review guidance (whether APP guidance or otherwise) in any scenario that they have not (or not recently) dealt with. I fully appreciate that this will need to have a “where practicable” caveat, since that will not always be operationally possible. In this case, however, there was ample time for an officer to check. One of the officers is heard saying words to the effect of “there is nothing more we can do here”, whilst waiting for the ambulance to arrive. I consider that Thames Valley Police (and police forces nationally) should consider not only requiring officers to do this wherever possible, but also for control to remind teams to do this or assist them with that. It would be best practice for this to be recorded on the log as having been completed. This could be achieved by a phone call to a senior officer, or by checking guidance directly. It was suggested by the Medical Director of South Central Ambulance Service that police and ambulance services should work together in reviewing their policies and perhaps train together as well. This is something I would endorse completely. Ambulance issues One of the reasons that I consider that joint training would be more effective is that it would appear (based on the evidence I heard at least), that police are potentially given more training on ABD than paramedics. We heard, for instance, that police training includes reference to prolonged restraint being dangerous. The paramedic evidence we heard indicated that this was not known by them, and not referred to in JRCALC guidance. I consider that the JRCALC guidelines should be reviewed to account for this, and potentially to recommend that paramedic staff be encouraged to ask how long somebody has been restrained for when they arrive, as this may affect their management. There should also be care taken regarding terminology, to ensure that all services refer to this umbrella term using the same terminology. ”

    Source location

    Neal Terence Saunders · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Brief contact-management staff and deliver dedicated training on ABD recognition, medical emergencies, accurate ambulance communication, incident logging, and proactive restraint-safety prompts.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Contact Management Training”

    Source location

    Response from Thames Valley Police
    Page 5 · response
    Published 19 December 2022

    Open published response
  3. Dorset

    AI-generated summary

    Douglas Paul Oak · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    On 11 April 2017, Douglas Paul Oak displayed erratic and frantic behaviour in Poole and was restrained by police after presenting with symptoms of Acute Behavioural Disturbance (ABD). An ambulance request was initially categorised as Category 3, and Douglas went into cardiac arrest before paramedics arrived; he died in hospital the following day. The report raised concerns about inadequate awareness and training on ABD, the lack of national guidance for police and ambulance services, ambulance call prioritisation, sedation, and communication between emergency services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of Emergency Services to use mutually understood control-room terminology

    Wider context from the report

    “v. Given that the Police and Ambulance Services work very closely in treating and managing a patient with ABD, and other patients who present with life threatening conditions, it is important that they understand each other. It was clear from this Inquest that there is different terminology used by the different services, the meaning of which is not understood by the other Emergency Services. An example of this was the use of the phrase “on the hurry up”. Although the confusion regarding this terminology was not found to be causative or contributory to Doug’s death, it could be in respect of a future death. I therefore request that consideration is given to the joint national training packages for all Emergency Services, namely the Police Service, Ambulance Service and the Fire Service on the workings within each control room and around the language used in the control rooms. ”

    Source location

    Douglas Paul Oak · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 8 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a standardised ABD presentation and training template for police and ambulance control-room staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The NPCC is working with ████████ and Subject Matter Experts in police and ambulance (SECAMBE and LAS) Control Rooms to produce a PowerPoint on ABD specifically for police and ambulance control room staff. This PowerPoint will form the basis of a template for both police force or ambulance trusts to train their staff with the aim of teaching recognition of ABD and the risk to life, thereby standardising the language and response to ABD (point 2.v). For the first time this PowerPoint is also endorsed by the Independent Ambulance Association and Heath Practice Associates (Council) increasing the reach of the material. We will also share this with the Association of Ambulance Chief Executives or the National Ambulance Service Medical Directors.”

    Source location

    2019-0352-Response-by-College-of-Policing
    Page 4 · response
    Published 22 November 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue national work with emergency-service partners to improve consistency in ABD recognition and prioritisation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The College and the NPCC will continue to work at a national level to secure greater consistency in the recognition and prioritisation of ABD. It is also our position that forces should discuss communication issues with their local emergency service providers.”

    Source location

    2019-0352-Response-by-College-of-Policing
    Page 5 · response
    Published 22 November 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    There are seldom misunderstandings about response urgency because call handlers seek details and ambulance triage is based on clinical presentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We accept that clarity in language is important when communicating across emergency services. Contact Management officers and staff are trained to enquire and probe for additional details when receiving calls and our experience leads us to believe that there are seldom misunderstandings in relation to the importance of response required. It is however recognised that the ambulance service triage each call based on the description of the medical presentation of the patient not on the type of illness being stated.”

    Source location

    2019-0352-Response-by-College-of-Policing
    Page 5 · response
    Published 22 November 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Forces should address communication issues, including local ambulance-service arrangements, with their local emergency-service providers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The College and the NPCC will continue to work at a national level to secure greater consistency in the recognition and prioritisation of ABD. It is also our position that forces should discuss communication issues with their local emergency service providers.”

    Source location

    2019-0352-Response-by-College-of-Policing
    Page 5 · response
    Published 22 November 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of common terminology or use of “on the hurry up” is not considered the cause of the ambulance response problem.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “v) We do not believe that the absence of common terminology or the use of the term ‘on the hurry up’ was the issue. The ambulance response to all incidents are prioritised on information based on the patients presenting condition. Therefore it is essential to obtain appropriate information about the patient’s condition, and that this is passed from police to ambulance services in order to correctly prioritise the response and this will be our principal focus of ongoing work with the police. Once the new guidance on ABD has been ratified and issued and the trial in Yorkshire as described in point ii above has been completed, we will continue to discuss this in our work with the police to improve communications between ambulance and police control rooms.”

    Source location

    2019-0352-Response-by-Association-of-Ambulance-Chief-Executives
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 November 2019

    Open published response
  4. London North (Inner)

    AI-generated summary

    Michael James SWEENEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Michael James Sweeney died after taking cocaine and becoming extremely agitated; he was transported to hospital by police after an ambulance was not sent within the target time. He was restrained prone until sedation was effective, then arrested and died less than two hours later. The principal concerns were the inconsistent use and understanding of the term “excited delirium”, the risk of missing other medical causes of extreme agitation, and ambulance-service prioritisation of such emergencies.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of shared recognition of the term “excited delirium” across emergency services

    Wider context from the report

    “Police officers had clearly been trained in the condition described to them as excited delirium. The training was effective in facilitating their understanding of Mr Sweeney’s condition as a medical emergency. However, this term is not widely used in this country, and neither ambulance, nursing nor even some of the medical staff had heard of it in April 2011. It would be possible to give ambulance and hospital personnel an understanding of the term excited delirium. However, given that this describes a medical condition, it seems more logical for the police to follow health services in this, rather than the other way round. Moreover, although it did not happen in Mr Sweeney’s case, there could be situations where a person exhibits extreme agitation that is not related to an acute drug psychosis. There is the potential for an organic cause to be missed because of reliance on that term as an apparent diagnosis. Extreme agitation can be caused by conditions such as a bleed on the brain, sepsis from infection (e.g. meningitis), or a diabetic coma. From the evidence I heard, the safest and most effective way to deal with a person exhibiting such an acute behavioural disturbance seems to be simply to use the term “extreme agitation”. This describes the constellation of symptoms without purporting to diagnose the cause. 1. Such an approach would require the Metropolitan Police Service simply to amend the training it currently delivers, to describe the condition as “extreme agitation” rather than “excited delirium”. 2. The take home message that the condition is a medical emergency should still be part and parcel of the training, in just the way it is now. 3. This training would also need to be delivered in some form to police control staff, so that they recognise the importance of the term when an officer uses it, and pass this on to the ambulance service. 4. Finally, it would require London Ambulance Service to amend its protocols and training to recognise extreme agitation as a medical emergency and prioritise appropriately. ”

    Source location

    Michael James SWEENEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Adopt Acute Behavioural Disorder as the common terminology for the relevant medical emergency.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Secondly, both national and Metropolitan Police training on the correct terminology to use have in fact already moved on since the date of this incident. Though the ‘constellation of behaviours’ has at various points in the developing knowledge about it’s causes and effects been known (inter alia) as ‘cocaine psychosis’, and ‘excited delirium’, since 2010 the generally recognised phrase within UK police texts has been ‘Acute Behavioural Disorder’ (‘ABD’). This phrase was chosen to provide exactly the “ ‘precision without ‘diagnosis’ “ you indicated would be a necessary element of any common terminology adopted. Inspector ████████ provides the practitioner’s context:”

    Source location

    2013-0236-Response-by-Metropolitan-Police
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 September 2013

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain Acute Behavioural Disorder content in officers’ regular Officer Safety and Emergency Life Support training, including refresher training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The generic term Acute Behaviour Disorder was selected as the most appropriate term and ABD was subsequently fast-tracked into the National Personal Safety Manual. The Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine also adopted the terminology of ABD, and have produced guidance on the management of this condition. The medical implications of the manual's techniques and guidance (including ABD) were reviewed by Professor ████████ in 2010. Furthermore, additional improvements were most recently made to the ABD advice by Professor ████████ in 2012, following Rule 43 advice in another case.”

    Source location

    2013-0236-Response-by-Metropolitan-Police
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 September 2013

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Direct Central Communications Command staff to identify relevant calls in messages to the ambulance service and provide supporting training on awareness and procedures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “These moves to enhance staff awareness of the condition and the terminology of ABD to describe it, undertaken by our partners in the LAS, have been mirrored in steps undertaken within our own call-handling centre, the Central Communications Command (CCC). On the 20th September 2013, Chief Inspector Horwood issued the following practice direction to all Central Communications Command Staff:”

    Source location

    2013-0236-Response-by-Metropolitan-Police
    Page 4 · response
    Published 23 September 2013

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete the joint MPS–LAS Memorandum of Understanding containing documented call-handling guidance and communication arrangements for suspected Acute Behavioural Disorder.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Point 4 above is of course a matter for the London Ambulance Service. I understand they will be replying to you separately on this. I would anticipate however that they will in that response make reference to the adoption of a new Memorandum of Understanding between our respective services, on providing ‘...guidance on joint working including use of CAD Link and Joint Response Units’, which we are now in the final stages of completing.”

    Source location

    2013-0236-Response-by-Metropolitan-Police
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 September 2013

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Encourage NHS partners to adopt Acute Behavioural Disorder terminology and increase supporting awareness of the condition.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The potential information gap for MPS civil staff working at Central Communications Command who do not receive this training routinely has been addressed by the issuing of direct practice notes, and supported by a programme of in-house training on awareness of the issues and correct procedures to adopt. Meanwhile, the development of a detailed and documented joint agency call-handling protocol with our partners at London Ambulance Service, contained within the new Memorandum of Understanding, gives both ‘First Responder’ agencies a common wellspring of guidance to draw upon, a robust channel of communication where ABD is suspected, and clarity regarding the expectations each agency can have of the other’s response in these circumstances. It is now important that staff in emergency departments are also made aware of this condition and its management.”

    Source location

    2013-0236-Response-by-Metropolitan-Police
    Page 5 · response
    Published 23 September 2013

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Educate staff and communicate terminology covering acute behavioural disturbance and excited delirium.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The LAS alongside our colleagues in the Police Services in London currently use the term acute behavioural disturbance (ABD) to describe the clinical manifestation of disturbed behavior, which is often associated with recreational drug use and / or some aspects of mental health. The term is described by the Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine of the Royal College of Physicians (England) in their helpful guidelines paper dealing with the recognition and treatment of this clinical presentation¹. It is from these guidelines, produced by this leading clinical authority on the subject, that the LAS have taken the view that the term “acute behavioural disturbance” (ABD) is appropriate to describe this group of patients and have used this term in the education of our staff.”

    Source location

    2013-0236-Response-by-London-Ambulance-Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 September 2013

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Upgrade police-originated calls involving acute behavioural disturbance, cocaine toxicity or physical restraint to the highest response category.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In essence, it is the use of the word “acute” that is felt to be key. Since April 2013 the LAS has been upgrading the triage category (to our highest level of response) of calls from the police where there is information which notes the patient is suffering from acute behavioural disturbance, cocaine toxicity, or is being physically restrained.”

    Source location

    2013-0236-Response-by-London-Ambulance-Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 September 2013

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Raise terminology and guidance issues through the national Ambulance Service Mental Health Working Group for review.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “excited delirium, which specifically relates to police incapacitant devices (TASERS). We have raised this issue through the national Ambulance Service Mental Health Working Group, asking them to look both at the appropriate terminology and guidance around the subject matter itself. The national Ambulance Service Mental Health Working Group has confirmed that they will issue a position statement about the use of an appropriate term following a response to their proposal from the Royal College of Psychiatrists.”

    Source location

    2013-0236-Response-by-London-Ambulance-Service
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 September 2013

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share the response with the Pan-London Emergency Department Consultants Group to disseminate the term acute behavioural disturbance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We recognise that the evidence you heard was that some Emergency Department staff were not familiar with the term ABD and as such we will share this response with the Pan-London Emergency Department Consultants Group in order to disseminate the use of the term ABD to the Emergency Departments in London.”

    Source location

    2013-0236-Response-by-London-Ambulance-Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 September 2013

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing Acute Behavioural Disorder training makes additional police training changes on terminology and recognising the medical emergency unnecessary.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your recommendation regarding a common terminology has been accepted by all partners. It is respectfully submitted however that the adoption by the London Ambulance Service of the term ‘Acute Behavioural Disorder’ as the term of choice effectively negates the additional training changes recommended in points 1 and 2 of your report, as active training on ABD and responses to it remain an ongoing element in all regular refresher training sessions for police officers, and this, we are given to understand, is now being paralleled within the LAS via their own training and practice direction regimes.”

    Source location

    2013-0236-Response-by-Metropolitan-Police
    Page 5 · response
    Published 23 September 2013

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The term “extremely agitated” does not adequately describe this presentation and may not prompt an appropriate timely response.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “On 18th October 2013 at the meeting of the Metropolitan Police Clinical Advisory Group, there was consensus that the term ABD was already in common use by paramedics, Emergency Medical Technicians, police officers and the forensic clinicians. The Group has senior medical and clinical representation from the LAS, the Metropolitan Police Forensic Medical Services, and the Education and Training Departments of both organisations. The group’s view was that to re-educate our staff on the use of a different term would be challenging, and may well present a greater risk by using terminology that the pre hospital multi-disciplinary team may not be familiar with. It was felt that the term “extremely agitated” does not adequately describe this particular clinical presentation, is open to wide interpretation, and would not prompt the appropriate timely response.”

    Source location

    2013-0236-Response-by-London-Ambulance-Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 September 2013

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Protocols and training will not change to adopt the recommended terminology unless and until it accords with national ambulance-service guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The London Ambulance Service NHS Trust (the LAS) remains of the view that ‘acute behavioural disturbance’ is the term that most accurately reflects the presentations of this group of patients as well as being recognised by the appropriate bodies and we do not consider that the recommendation can be agreed unless / until the change in terminology accords with national guidance for UK ambulance services.”

    Source location

    2013-0236-Response-by-London-Ambulance-Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 23 September 2013

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026